Ved: Yajurved: Poorv Vinshati: Adhyāý 1: Mantr 1
————————————————————————————
————————————————————————————————————–
1. 1Om! for food/the will power, thee. For energy, thee. Breezes are ye. Divine Creator impel, you all, to noblest work. Complete properly, Inviolable female! share for the controller of organs. Rich in offspring/subject. Free from sickness. Free from diminishing. No thief rule on you, no evil-praiser. Be constant in this master of ‘go’, numerous females! Guard the cattle of the worshiper.
————————————————————————–
1. Yajurved is the second volume of Ved.
Yajurved is divided into forty chapters. Each chapter is called ‘Adhyāý’.
These forty chapters are grouped in two groups of twenty chapters each.
The first group is called ‘Poorv Vinshati’, and the second one is called ‘Uttar Vinshati’.
‘Vinshati’, in Sanskr’t, means ‘twenty’, nothing else.
It is clear from this Mantr, thus, that Yajurved does not deal with definitions, as R’g Ved did.
It deals with family and politics.
Family:
‘Complete properly, Inviolable female! Share for the controller of organs. Rich in offspring/subject. Free from sickness. Free from diminishing.’
‘aapyaayadhvamaghnyaa’indraay’ bhaagam prajaavateeranameevaa’ayaxmaa. ‘
Politics:
‘No thief rule on you, no evil-praiser.’
”maa v’ sten eishat maaghshagvaongso.’
Throughout Yajurved, we find these two subjects, mainly, dealt with.
Ralph T. H. Griffith M.A., C.I.E. has introduced Yajurved thus:
‘THE YAJURVEDA—derived from the roots yaj, to sacrifice or, worship, and vid, to know,—is the Knowledge of Sacrifice or Sacrificial Texts and Formulas as distinguished from the Rigveda or Knowledge of Recited Praise, the Sâmaveda or Knowledge of Chanted Hymns, and the Atharva or Brahmaveda which is the Knowledge of Prayer, Charm, and Spells. Though ranking second in the Indian enumeration of the Vedas and containing much that is of very ancient origin, its compilation in its present form, exhibiting as it does the almost complete development of castes and mixt castes and considerable advance in arts and sciences, trades, handicrafts and occupations, is evidently of later date than that even of the Atharva.’
I’m sorry to disagree, profoundly, with the learned scholar of Ved, Ralph T. H. Griffith M.A., C.I.E., here.
First of all, Ved should not be valued, each volume separately, altogether.
It can be valued thus, to evaluate each volume of Ved, separately.
But, even then, the evaluator must never forget that these volumes are, after all, the volumes of a Complete Book.
The entire Book has a meaning of its own.
The volumes are necessary to provide easy perusal of the book.
They are not separate books.
They are volumes of a Complete Book, conveying its own meaning.
Unfortunately, this original concept is missing altogether in these prefaces, or introductions to separate volumes of Ved, making them erroneous thus.
———————————————————————————————————–
Commentary on Ved from DSM Satyarthi:
1. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 1| Mantr 1
2. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 1| Mantr 2
3. R’gved: Mandal 2| Sookt 1| Mantr 1
4. R’gved: Mandal 3| Sookt 1| Mantr 1
5. R’gved: Mandal 4| Sookt 1| Mantr 1
6. R’gved: Mandal 5| Sookt 1| Mantr 1
7. R’gved: Mandal 6| Sookt 1| Mantr 1
8. R’gved: Mandal 7| Sookt 1| Mantr 1
9. R’gved: Mandal 8| Sookt 1| Mantr 1
10. R’gved: Mandal 9| Sookt 1| Mantr 1
11. R’gved: Mandal 10| Sookt 1| Mantr 1
12. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 1| Mantr 1
13. Saamved: Mantr 1
14. Atharv Ved: Kaand 1| Sookt 1| Mantr 1
———————————————————————————–
More on Ved from DSM Satyarthi:
1. ‘According to facts’: ‘Yaathaatathyatah’
2. According to Hinduism: We must be polite, not coward
[...] profound humanity we find in Ved. These other books lack the depth Ved has. How can it be if the Ved and the other books are from the same source? A writer revises, improves himself in his later work [...]
[...] 2. Yajurved Poorv Vinshati Adhyaay’ 1 Mantr 1 [...]
[...] Hinduism builds its society on SUKR’TS: ‘Udyachchhadhvamap raxo hanaathemaam naareem SUKR’TE dadhaat. Dhaataa vipashchit patimasyai vived, bhago raajaa pur etu prajaanan.’ ‘Stand up/Raise ye. Smite away the demons. SET THIS WOMAN for WELL DOER. Inspired holder/guardian must know especially the husband for her. The well knowing politician come first/ahead for her genital organ.’ -Ved: 4 Atharv Ved: 14/1/59 Hinduism is, thus, a society of SUKR’TS WELL DOERS only. An evil doer does not have any matrimonial rights, in Hinduism, thus; while the woman marrying him, is not bound to be a well doer. She may be a well doer, she may be NOT. Any woman can marry a Sukr’t, even if she does not agree with his system of life. That’s why PITR’YAGY’, Not MAATR’YAGY’. That’s why ‘ANUVRATAH PITUH PUTRO’, not ‘Anuvratah MAATUH putro’ That’s why PATRIARCHAL SYSTEM OF HINDUISM, not Matriarchal. It’s not gender biased actually. It’s GOOD DEED biased, to build an eternal humane society MARCHING AGGRESSIVELY TO INFINITE DIVINITY always. ‘Ut devaa avhitam devaa unnyathaa punah, Utaagashchakrusham devaa devaa jeevyathaa punah.’ ‘Divine ones! Divine ones! raise up the downtrodden. And, Divine ones! Divine ones! Make him to live again, who hath done evil.’ -Ved: 4 Atharv Ved: 4/13/1 ‘Om ishe tvorjje tvaa vaayav sth’ devo vah savitaa praarpayatu shreshthtamaay’ karman’aapyaayadhvamaghnyaa’in draay’ bhaagam prajaavateeranameevaa’ayaxmaa maa v’ sten eishat maaghshagvagvonso dhruvaa’asmin gopatau syaat bahveeryajmaanasy’ pashoonpaahi.’ ‘Om! for food/the energy of desire, thee. For energy, thee. Breezes are ye. Divine Creator impel, you all, to noblest work. Complete properly, Inviolable female! share for the controller of organs.Rich in offspring/subject. Free from sickness. Free from diminishing. No thief rule on you, no evil-praiser. Be constant in this master of ‘go’, numerous! Guard the cattle of the worshiper.’ -Ved: 2 Yajurved: 1/1 [...]
[...] Hinduism is, thus, a society of SUKR’TS WELL DOERS only. An evil doer does not have any matrimonial rights, in Hinduism, thus; while the woman marrying him, is not bound to be a well doer. She may be a well doer, she may be NOT. That’s why PITR’YAGY’, Not MAATR’YAGY’. That’s why ‘ANUVRATAH PITUH PUTRO’, not ‘Anuvratah MAATUH putro’ That’s why PATRIARCHAL SYSTEM OF HINDUISM. It’s not gender biased actually. It’s GOOD DEED biased, to build an eternal humane society MARCHING AGGRESSIVELY TO DIVINITY always. ‘Ut devaa avhitam devaa unnyathaa punah, Utaagashchakrusham devaa devaa jeevyathaa punah.’ ‘Divine ones! Divine ones! raise up the downtrodden. And, Divine ones! Divine ones! Make him to live again, who hath done evil.’ -Ved: 4 Atharv Ved: 4/13/1 ‘Om ishe tvorjje tvaa vaayav sth’ devo vah savitaa praarpayatu shreshthtamaay’ karman’aapyaayadhvamaghnyaa’in draay’ bhaagam prajaavateeranameevaa’ayaxmaa maa v’ sten eishat maaghshagvagvonso dhruvaa’asmin gopatau syaat bahveeryajmaanasy’ pashoonpaahi.’ ‘Om! for food/the energy of desire, thee. For energy, thee. Breezes are ye. Divine Creator impel, you all, to noblest work. Complete properly, Inviolable female! share for the controller of organs.Rich in offspring/subject. Free from sickness. Free from diminishing. No thief rule on you, no evil-praiser. Be constant in this master of ‘go’, numerous! Guard the cattle of the worshiper.’ -Ved: 2 Yajurved: 1/1 [...]
[...] does not tally with the structure Ved proposes for the human Societies, Daneel! Eīshān Param Brahm Parmātmā has designed the [...]
[...] Thy Hindu prick is best. [...]
[...] friends and family laugh at me when I offer Stavans to your Eīshān Param Brahm [...]
[...] extremely beautiful Muslimahs female friends, from almost every Islamic country were now fucking Durgesh, without any [...]
[...] don’t stop, Durgesh!” She gasped, “Durgesh! [...]
[...] Hinduism builds its society on SUKR’TS, not on horses as the hate mongers claim. Hinduism, thus, builds a society of SUKR’TS’ ‘WELL DOERS’ only. An evil doer does not have any matrimonial rights, in Hinduism, thus; while the woman marrying him, is not bound to be a well doer. She may be a well doer, she may be NOT. Any woman can marry a Sukr’t, even if she does not agree with his system of life. That’s why PITR’YAGY’, Not MAATR’YAGY’. That’s why ‘ANUVRATAH PITUH PUTRO’, not ‘Anuvratah MAATUH putro’ That’s why PATRIARCHAL SYSTEM OF HINDUISM, not Matriarchal. It’s not gender biased actually. It’s GOOD DEED biased, to build an eternal humane society MARCHING AGGRESSIVELY TO INFINITE DIVINITY always. ‘Ut devaa avhitam devaa unnyathaa punah, Utaagashchakrusham devaa devaa jeevyathaa punah.’ ‘Divine ones! Divine ones! raise up the downtrodden. And, Divine ones! Divine ones! Make him to live again, who hath done evil.’ -Ved: 4 Atharv Ved: 4/13/1 ‘Om ishe tvorjje tvaa vaayav sth’ devo vah savitaa praarpayatu shreshthtamaay’ karman’aapyaayadhvamaghnyaa’in draay’ bhaagam prajaavateeranameevaa’ayaxmaa maa v’ sten eishat maaghshagvagvonso dhruvaa’asmin gopatau syaat bahveeryajmaanasy’ pashoonpaahi.’ ‘Om! for food/the energy of desire, thee. For energy, thee. Breezes are ye. Divine Creator impel, you all, to noblest work. Complete properly, Inviolable female! share for the controller of organs.Rich in offspring/subject. Free from sickness. Free from diminishing. No thief rule on you, no evil-praiser. Be constant in this master of ‘go’, numerous! Guard the cattle of the worshiper.’ -Ved: 2 Yajurved: 1/1 [...]
[...] “Durgesh―Durgesh―Durgesh. Is he your husband now― is he your Kħasam now that you talk of him twenty-four hours? Says I behave. And, how are you behaving with your own real mother―you bitch!” [...]
[...] Safdar Al Saåeed watched as I aimed my Hindu Cock at his beautiful wife’s Saůūdī Årab Muslimā [...]
[...] Yajurved deals with family and politics essentially. [...]
[...] 4. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 1| Mantr 1 [...]
[...] Sciences, Society, Ved, Ved Bhashy, Yajurved ‘No thief rule on you, no evil praiser’: ‘Maa v’ sten eishat, maa aghshagvogso’: Ved: DSM [...]
[...] proposes democracy and PROGRESSIVE POLITICS: Yajurved opens: ‘Om ishe tvorjje tvaa vaayav sth’ devo vah savitaa praarpayatu shreshthtamaay’ [...]