Hinduism according to Ved: DSM Satyarthi

9. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 6

10. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 7

11. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 8

12.R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 9

55. Atharv Ved: Kaand 14| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

56. Atharv Ved: Kaand 14| Sookt 1| Mantr 2

57. Atharv Ved: Kaand 14| Sookt 1| Mantr 3

58. Atharv Ved: Kaand 14| Sookt 1| Mantr 4

59. Atharv Ved: Kaand 14| Sookt 1| Mantr 22

60.Atharv Ved: Kaand 14| Sookt 2| Mantr 25

Filed under: Atharv Ved, Atharva Veda, Bachhalyas, Behavioural Science, Bible, Christianity, Commentary on Ved, debate on Hinduism, debate on Islam, DSM Satyarthi, Eternity, Hinduism, History, Humanity, Islam, Muslim Feminism, Politics, Polygamy, Qur'an, Religion, Social Sciences, Terrorism, Ved, Ved Bhashy, Vedas, Women in Islam Tagged: Atharv Ved, Atheism, Behavioural Science, Commentary on Ved, Communism, DSM Satyarthi, Feminism, Frederick Engels, genital organ, Hinduism, History, Humanity, Islam, Karl Marx, life sciences, Muslimahs, Muslimat, qur, Qur'an, Religion, Social Sciences, Socialism, Society, telegraphic language, True Islam, unfortunate tragedy, Ved, Ved Bhashy, western culture, westerners

Ved Bhāshý: Atharv Ved: Kānd: 14: Sookt: 1: Mantr:59

Durgesh — Mon, 19 Sep 2011 00:17:46 +0000

Ved Bhāshý:

Kānd: 14: Sookt: 1: Mantr:59

DSM Satyarthi

——————————————————————————————-

Udyachchhadhvamap raxo hanāthémām nārīm sukr’té dadhāt.

Dhātā vipashchit patimasyai vivéd bhago rājā pur étu prajānan.

——————————————————————————————–

¹Stand up²/Raise ye³. Smite away the demons⁴. Set this woman for well doer⁵. Inspired holder/guardian⁶ must know especially⁷ the husband for her⁸. The well knowing politician⁹ come first/ahead¹⁰ for her genital organ¹¹.

—————————————————————————————–

1.R’shikā: Sūryā Sāvitrī

Dévtā/ Divine Subject: Ātmā, Soul

Chhand/Meter: Trishŧup

7. that her husband must be a Sukr’t, a well doer, and well doer only.

He must ensure absolutely, beyond doubt, that he is not a wicked.

It should never be taken lightly.

He must know and guarantee it especially, ‘Vivéd’.

After all he is a dhātā and he must be Vipashchit.

If he is a dhātā and he is not a Vipashchit, he must take the help of other Vipashchits.

Atharv Ved: Kaand 14| Sookt 2| Mantr 25

———————————————————————————————–

9. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 6

10. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 7

11. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 8

12.R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 9

55. Atharv Ved: Kaand 14| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

56. Atharv Ved: Kaand 14| Sookt 1| Mantr 2

57. Atharv Ved: Kaand 14| Sookt 1| Mantr 3

58. Atharv Ved: Kaand 14| Sookt 1| Mantr 4

59. Atharv Ved: Kaand 14| Sookt 1| Mantr 22

60.Atharv Ved: Kaand 14| Sookt 2| Mantr 25

Filed under: Atharv Ved, Atharva Veda, Behavioural Science, Commentary on Ved, debate on Hinduism, DSM Satyarthi, Eternity, Hinduism, Humanity, Interfaith marriages, Polygamy, Religion, Social Sciences, Ved, Ved Bhashy, Vedas Tagged: Atharv Ved, Behavioural Science, Commentary on Ved, DSM Satyarthi, Hinduism, Humanity, life sciences, Religion, Social Sciences, Society, Ved, Ved Bhashy

Ved: 4 Atharv Ved: Kānd 14| Vivāh Kānd: Sookt 1| Mantr 1

Durgesh — Sat, 23 Jul 2011 00:54:34 +0000

Ved: Ved Bhāshý

4 Atharv Ved

Kānd 14 Vivāh Kānd:

Sūkt 1| Mantr 1

DSM Satyarthi

———————————————————————————

Satyénottabhitā bhūmih sūryéñottabhitā dyauh,

R’ténādityāstishŧhanti divi somo adhi shritah.

—————————————————————————-

¹By truth, the Earth is balanced². By Sun, the celestial system is balanced optimum³. By Eternal Truth Ādiyās stand⁴. In the celestial system, Som is set rightfully⁵.

————————————————————————

1.R’shikā: Sūryā Sāvitrī

Dévtā/ Divine Subject: Ātmā, Soul

Chhand/Meter: Trishŧup

2. ‘Satyénottabhitā bhūmih’.

‘Uttabhitā’ is feminine gender of ‘Ut-stabh’.

According to Āchārý Sāyañ, as every Western scholar of Ved claims to follow Āchārý Sāyañ, whether he really does follow Āchārý Sāyañ or not, W. D. Whitney has also suggested the same, in his famous translation of Atharv Ved.

It does not mean, however, that this Commentary of Ved accepts the authority of W. D. Whitney, Ralph Thomas Hotchkin Griffith or Āchārý Sāyañ.

Never.

This Commentary of Ved accepts the authority of Ved, Shākhā Granths, Brāhmañ Granths, Ārañyaks, Upanishads, Nighanŧu, Nirukt and Vedic Sanskr’t Grammar only.

It can always be proved profoundly that the translations of W. D. Whitney, Āchārý Sāyañ, and other Western scholars, of Ved, do materially differ from Ved, Shākhā Granths, Brāhmañ Granths, Ārañyaks, Upanishads, Nighanŧu, Nirukt and Vedic Sanskr’t Grammar.

The translations of W. D. Whitney, Āchārý Sāyañ, and other Western scholars, of Ved, are either contradictory to Ved, Shākhā Granths, Brāhmañ Granths, Ārañyaks, Upanishads, Nighanŧu, Nirukt and Vedic Sanskr’t Grammar, or immensely poor translations of Ved, even if they follow Ved, Shākhā Granths, Brāhmañ Granths, Ārañyaks, Upanishads, Nighanŧu, Nirukt and Vedic Sanskr’t Grammar, anywhere.

The Western scholars of Ved and their so-called Indian advocates claim the Western translations of Ved depict the true form of Ved as it was being practiced by Hindus initially.

Of course, their such claims are profoundly wrong and self contradictory.

The Commentary of Ved by Āchārý Sāyañ cannot be written before Āchārý Sāyañ, himself.

It is obvious from the request of King of Vijay Nagar Empire, to Āchārý Mādhav, that no Commentary of Ved was found those days, that explained the logic of Ved as it was used in Yāgnik rituals.

Āchārý Mādhav, the elder brother of Āchārý Sāyañ, refused immediately to grant the request of King of Vijay Nagar Empire, declaring it an unnecessary effort and not beneficial to Hindus too.

The King of Vijay Nagar Empire could not understand it.

He was only a king, not a scholar of Ved or Vedic Sanskr’t.

He requested to Āchārý Sāyañ, the younger brother of Āchārý Mādhav, to do the task seeking the guidance of his elder brother, Āchārý Mādhav, whenever, whatsoever and wherever it was available to him, as he was his real younger brother.

‘Satyénottabhitā bhūmih’ ‘By truth, the Earth is balanced’ means that even in marriage, never deviate from truth as it is told in Ved.

There are so many persons, especially in these days of rotten Western Culture, who ridicule the persons following truth in marriage activities.

They imply that it isn’t necessary anywhere to practice truth if it is not beneficial to the practitioners.

Even if it is beneficial to them in the long run, the Westerners and their Eastern followers profoundly and shamelessly disapprove of following it.

They treat such persons backward and either ridicule them or at least treat them sympathetically, as if they are doing any sin following the truth.

Ved rejects this dangerous policy ab initio.

It starts its Vivāh Kānd, its Book of Marriage, by reminding its followers the importance of truth in the System it proposes.

We know very well that it’s always immensely troublesome to the non followers of Ved to follow the truth in any matter.

If they could do it, why they would have not followed Ved itself?

Does Ved propose anything untrue anywhere in any Mantr of it?

Never.

Yet, either they openly refuse to follow Ved or tactfully at least.

They refuse to follow Ved, not because Ved is untrue.

They refuse to follow Ved, because Ved follows nothing but truth and truth only.

They can’t afford truth.

Their system of life is profoundly full of untruths.

Every system of life wherever it differs/deviates from Ved, is untrue there, either knowingly or unknowingly.

Whatever maybe the case, ultimately in both the cases, it’s always dangerous to follow it.

Sooner or later, the truth is always disclosed.

It can’t be hidden forever.

It is one of the fundamentals of Our System, running through infinite creations, that anything true, cannot be hidden forever.

It is bound to be exposed sooner or later.

Marriage is a serious affair.

It should never be based on anything untrue whatsoever.

There are so many persons, who don’t follow Ved, that suggest either this way or that way, not to be true in marriage activities, if something is harmful.

They suggest to hide that thing.

Ved does never approve of such suicidal action.

After marriage when it would be disclosed it may break the marriage even causing your daughter immensely troublesome circumstances.

The circumstances maybe suicidal even.

Consequently, never listen to the persons who suggest such impractical policies.

It’s not the matter of life and death for their own daughter.

But it is the matter of life and death for your own daughter

Can you ever even think of risking your daughter’s life/happiness?

If yes, why are you marrying your daughter/sister at all?

Only to get rid of her?

Never act on the suggestion(s) of your wife/wives in this matter.

If she is the mother of your daughter/sister, that’s what she does want in her blind love for her daughter.

A mother is always blind in her love for her children.

That’s how a mother is made by Us.

The children need it very much for their own very existence.

But it does not mean you must also be as blind in love as the mother is.

It does not make any difference whatsoever whether you are the father or brother of the potential bride.

Nevertheless, you have altogether different responsibilities from that of a mother.

You can’t afford to be as blind in love, as the mother is, and if not, she can be.

She is made for the purpose.

Are you also made for the same purpose?

The persons, who answer this question in the affirmative, are excused to do whatever they want to do.

Ved does not perceive them as men.

Even if they want to be perceived as men, Ved refuses bluntly to oblige them.

Vedic System of life expressly differentiates between a man and a woman.

It is never afraid of any nescience, any Avidyā, whatsoever it maybe.

It maybe Western Culture, it maybe the so called Islam that is Pseudo Islam actually, invented by Yazīd malåūn, Årab Burdāfaroshs and the then Mullahs and Maulavīs who served Yazīd malåūn, and Årab Burdāfaroshs in developing Pseudo Islam.

It maybe atheism even.

Whatsoever the nescience maybe, Hinduism/Ved is never afraid of it.

It has already announced valiantly:

‘Vidyām chāvidyām ch’ yastdvédobhayagvong sah, avidyayā mr’tyum tīrtvā vidyayāmr’tamashnuté.’

‘Science and nescience who knows both simultaneously, by nescience crossing death, by science attains Eternity.’

— Ved: 2 Yajurvéd: 40| 14

Ved differentiates between man and woman.

Of course, it does not differentiate in their fundamental human rights.

It differentiates in their physical differences, none can deny ever.

Owing to their physical differences therefore, Hinduism/Ved proposes them two different fields of actions.

Never imitate irrationally the non Hindus foolishly.

They are a dying culture now, dying fastest.

Hinduism/Ved is the culture now replacing their dying culture fastest whether they like it or not.

In not very far future, you have to lead the entire humankind once more forever, if you follow Us unconditional.

It is not the everfirst you have to do it.

Our followers have always done it physically, even if they widely differed in their names.

3. ‘Sūryéñottabhitā dyauh.’

After reminding the importance of truth, now Ved is reminding the specific nature of the movement of Hinduism/Ved.

It is not like other remaining movements.

It is based on Sukr’ts.

Its Mission of life/existence is to establish a society of Sukr’ts, noble doers.

Even for marriage, it can never compromise with its Mission of life/existence Kr’ñvanto Vishvamāryam/ Dharmsantānam/Dharmsansthāpan.

Consequently, it immediately advances to tell that, basically, it’s a polygamist movement.

Of course, polygamy is not an indispensable necessity here, but it cannot be ruled out entirely too.

As far as the law of the land is concerned, polygamy is legally prohibited in most of the modern countries today.

In these modern countries, of course, every member of this movement, even, has to follow the law of the land.

Even if he is a sun in vigor, and the celestial system is balanced by the sun, optimum, he would never break the law of the land.

Till it is the law, he would, of course, respect and follow it.

But it does never mean that he would not put his utmost legal prudence and efforts to change the law of the land to suit the nature of his Mission of life/existence Kr’ñvanto Vishvamāryam/ Dharmsantānam/Dharmsansthāpan, using every legal step and means.

He is of course a citizen of the country and as such, he has, both, to respect and follow the law of the land, till it is the law of the land.

His duties towards his country do not necessitate him to forget his greater duties towards entire humanity.

His potential bride and her relatives must understand this fact expressly, entirely and specifically.

If he is not capable to practice polygamy physically, legally or financially, it does not mean that he would not put his extreme efforts even to be capable for it physically, legally or financially, whatsoever the case maybe.

4. ‘R’ténādityāstishŧhanti.’

You can run away neither from the Eternal Facts, described in Ved extensively, nor from the local truth and the truths as they are found and believed in your own time.

Practically, that’s the maximum, you can do.

Of course, so many persons among you still ridicule any grave interpretations of Ved.

But they ridicule actually whatsoever religious guidance you follow.

They are not against Ved, actually.

Actually, they are against everything religious.

They are actually confused persons.

They ridicule the persons following Ved, as if they know very well it’s profound foolishness.

But if you try to discuss with them what they themselves have to offer to replace Ved, if they really find to follow Ved is, Shanno Mitrah sham varuñah shanno bhavatvaryamā, ridiculous.

They have nothing to offer to replace Ved, yet they still ridicule to follow Ved.

Why?

They themselves don’t know.

They, Shanno Mitrah sham varuñah shanno bhavatvaryamā, ridicule Ved and its followers, but they don’t know its alternative.

Yet, they think they are more prudent than the persons following Ved.

They most certainly are not.

They think they are more prudent but if you really invite them to discuss their own ideology, you may be surprised to find that they don’t have any ideology at all.

It is the real fact.

The persons who don’t have any ideology at all, ridicule the persons who have a perfectly rational and scientific ideology they can discuss thoroughly, extensively and without any hesitation and irritation at all.

So many Hindus think it’s communal to think of oneself as a Hindu.

But they don’t think it’s communal if a Musalmān thinks himself as a Musalmān, a Christian thinks himself as a Christian, a Jew thinks himself as a Jew, a Persian thinks himself as a Persian and an atheist thinks himself as an atheist.

He does not realize it’s double standard, actually, he/she is practicing about Hindus.

He/she goes on to practice it without never realizing even what he/she is practicing is entirely unjust, irrational and inhumane even.

It was started by anti Hindus, and even the so called Hindus are practicing it now, without any realization whatsoever what they are doing.

They ridicule Hindus while actually they are themselves the persons who should be ridiculed for their profound stupidity.

If you don’t want to be recognized as a Hindu, no one is compelling you to do so.

You just go ahead and declare so.

But you can’t do even that.

Because you are actually a timid and coward person.

You are afraid of knowing what you are actually.

You don’t want to acknowledge the fact that you are actually yourself ridiculous, timid and coward.

Hindus are most certainly Not.

How is a person ridiculous if he/she has and practices a rational, scientific and mathematical ideology?

And how are you even to be respected if you neither have nor practice any such thing?

Aren’t you yourself a person who deserve to be ridiculed instead ridiculing Hindus?

If you don’t want to be addressed as a Hindu, be brave and declare so.

If you want to remain only an Indian, an atheist or whatsoever you think yourself, it is not a problem for the Hindus.

You can do whatsoever you damn please.

But you can’t be allowed to deceive and to cheat the others.

It’s not only an immoral act; it’s a crime as well.

If you are not even aware of it, think how prudent you are yourself, ridiculing Hindus.

Do you really want to continue it?

You like it or not, until and unless you don’t declare you are not a Hindu, you are legally a Hindu, and you’d be recognized as a Hindu for all practical and legal purposes.

As far as the social, legal and practical purposes are, the Hindus are concerned with you if you don’t declare that you are not a Hindu.

The question is why should the Hindus allow you to deceive, to cheat them, that you are a Hindu, if you are actually not a Hindu?

It is dangerous to them.

If there be a communal riot, and you can’t guarantee that there would never be one, the Hindus would believe that you are one of them while you are certainly not.

As such, you are not bound to defend Hindus against their communal enemies whosoever they may be.

While the Hindus would defend you and your interests.

Why should you be allowed this privilege by the persons you ridicule so shamelessly?

Why shouldn’t you be thrown to the wolves in the same way you throw the Hindus whenever you ridicule them?

Why should the Hindus allow you to have the benefits of being a Hindu when it’s beneficial to you, and the benefits of being an anti Hindu whenever it is beneficial to you?

Why Hindus should suffer in both the cases?

Why should you be allowed to get benefits in both the cases?

If you are not a Hindu, you would never be allowed to get its benefits.

And if you are a Hindu, you can’t be allowed to ridicule the other Hindus in your profound stupidity.

If you are a secular Hindu and hate the other Hindus because they are not secular in your profound stupid eyes, you are invited respectfully to discuss your points and to prove you are right.

You can do it.

But if instead of discussing your points if you stupidly ridicule the actually secular, rational, scientific and mathematical Hindus you’d be ridiculed too.

If instead of behaving as a prudent person, you choose to behave irresponsibly, why should a responsible person follow you?

Why shouldn’t he/she ridicule you in the same way and bring your profound stupidity in front of the other reasonable responsible persons?

5. ‘Divi somo adhi shritah’.

You have to allow polygamy as a potential possibility at least if you really follow the system We propose.

Again, you can’t be allowed to have and eat your cake simultaneously.

If you live in a country that does not allow polygamy legally for your religious group, while it does allow the same for another religious group living in the same country, you must fight against such a shameless double standard in legal practice even.

If you think, polygamy is itself not correct you must revolt against the society that is allowed legally to practice it too.

However, you must never fight against the society itself enjoying such privileged legal rights.

The shameless corrupt politicians do such legal discriminations to keep different societies in their country fighting with each other and rule them.

They practically believe in the dangerous policy of ‘Divide and rule’, even if they don’t admit it in so many words.

Such imprudent policies are not only dangerous to the societies that are not in the position to avail of such discriminatory legal rights; these are far more dangerous to the societies that are allowed to enjoy such legal rights.

The societies having less rights, always hate the societies having more rights, whether one likes it or not.

In India, it has resulted in profound hatred against Musalmīn.

Hindus inadvertently hate Musalmīn even if they are not aware of any such hatred they are nourishing against Musalmīn in their heart unknowingly.

The unscrupulous politicians understand it and deliberately nurse it so that they keep divided both the societies and rule them.

Musalmān women find other women have not to bear other women in their marital status as their co wives as they have to.

They become jealous of such women enjoying exclusive marital bliss.

And in their jealousy they go to the extent to attract their Hindu husband.

It happens more if the Musalmān husband, practicing polygamy, doesn’t do justice among his Musalmān wives.

The Musalmān wives, who don’t get justice from their Musalmān husband, find a Hindu lover for themselves both to punish their Musalmān husband and keep themselves happy.

In India, it’s more drastic as most of the Musalmīn here are either uneducated or under educated.

Why a Musalmān woman, if she were intelligent, prudent and smart, would opt for an uneducated/under educated Musalmān husband while an equally intelligent, prudent and smart, highly educated Hindu husband/lover is available to her without any extra effort?

It brings hatred among loser Musalmīn against gaining Hindus.

The shrewd politicians again get benefits of ‘Divide and rule‘ policy, practically, even if they never accept it in so many words.

Atharv Ved: Kaand 14| Sookt 1| Mantr 2

——————————————————————————

9. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 6

10. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 7

11. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 8

12.R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 9

55. Atharv Ved: Kaand 14| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

56. Atharv Ved: Kaand 14| Sookt 1| Mantr 2

57. Atharv Ved: Kaand 14| Sookt 1| Mantr 3

58. Atharv Ved: Kaand 14| Sookt 1| Mantr 4

59. Atharv Ved: Kaand 14| Sookt 1| Mantr 22

60.Atharv Ved: Kaand 14| Sookt 2| Mantr 25

Filed under: Ashvinatam, Atharv Ved, Atharva Veda, Behavioural Science, Commentary on Ved, debate on Hinduism, DSM Satyarthi, Eternity, Hinduism, Humanity, Politics, Polygamy, Religion, Social Sciences, Ved, Ved Bhashy, Vedas, Women in Islam Tagged: Atharv Ved, Behavioural Science, Commentary on Ved, DSM Satyarthi, Hinduism, Humanity, Islam, life sciences, Muslimahs, Muslimat, Religion, Social Sciences, Society, Ved, Ved Bhashy

Ved: Ved Bhāshý: R’gved: Mandal 1: Sūkt 1: Mantr 3

Durgesh — Sat, 09 Jul 2011 07:32:01 +0000

Ved: R’gved:

Mandal 1|Sookt1|Mantr 3

Ashŧak 1| Adhyāý 1| Anuvāk 1| Varg 1

DSM Satyarthi

—————————————————————————————-

Agninā rayimashnavat poshamév divé dive,

yashasam vīrvattamam.

——————————————————————————————-

¹Through Agni, one obtains the affluence²; actually shield³, day by day⁴, fame⁵, the most valiant⁶.

——————————————————————————————-

1.R’shi: Madhuchchhandā Mahimvat Vaishvāmitr

Dévtā: Agni, one that leads to light

Chhand/Vedic Meter: Gāyatrī

Svar: Shadj.

2. He/she does not lose it.

The wicked ones have advertised and laboriously spread this thoroughly erroneous idea among the noble persons that the noble persons never obtain affluence, so that they would be afraid of being nobler and nobler more and more.

There are some persons, even among the persons who are called Hindus irrespective of whether they like it or not, who laugh at any serious attempt to explain Ved, and the human problems from Vedic point of view.

They think they know more than the persons who believe in Ved.

They argue why Hindus are so poor with respect to the Westerners if the noble ones obtain the affluence.

Their question can be answered gravely if they were really after the answer of their questions.

But unfortunately they are not after it.

They think themselves wiser and ask these questions only to ridicule the persons believing in Ved.

First, let it be clear that Ved is not revealed for Hindus.

It is revealed for the entire people, irrespective of their being Hindus, Musalmīn, Christians, Jews, atheists etc:

‘Yathemām vācham kalyāñīmāvadāni janebhyah,
Brahmrājayābhyāgvong shoodrāý chāryāý ch’ svāý chārnāý.’

‘Optimum, I deliver this welfare speech, for ALL THE PEOPLE: the intelligent ones, the politicians, the workers, the businesspersons, the self praising ones.’

—Ved: 2 Yajurvéd: 26|2

Ved does not classify human beings in Hindus and non Hindus.

It even refuses to use the term Hindu anywhere at all.

It classifies the entire human beings however in two classes of Sukr’ts, the noble ones; and dushkr’ts, the wicked ones.

This classification is qualitative, not communal.

Ved does not say that if someone follows it, he/she would get affluence through some magic.

No, never.

Ved even refuses to acknowledge the existence of magic anywhere.

Ved declares clearly:

‘Through Agni, one obtains the affluence.’

‘Agninā rayimashnavat.’

One may ask why the discussion about affluence, ‘rayim’, right from its beginning, even in its third Mantr, so earliest?

It is because that is what even the non-believers in Ved also want.

We want to assure Our followers that they have not to lose even what the non-believers in Ved are after.

The Westerners are not rich through their fair means.

Moreover, they are losing now even that, fast.

The difference in getting affluence through both the ways is quite clear now.

‘Through Agni’ ‘Agninā’ the affluence you get can’t leave you ever if you keep following Us.

While through the means the Westerners got affluence, you can yourselves see it is leaving them.

Hinduism/Ved divides the affluence in two parts.

The first is ‘Mahādhan’.

The second one is ‘Arbh’.

‘Indram Wayam Mahādhan indramarbhé havāmahé.’

‘We call Indr to the great wealth we call Indr to the smaller one’.

—Ved: 1R’gved: 1|7|5, 3 Sāmvéd Mantr 130, 4 Atharv Ved Kānd 20| Sūkt 70| Mantr 11, Taittirīý Brāhmañ 2|7|13|1.

It is clear from this very third Mantr of Ved that Indr cannot get affluence himself even according to Our System.

Even while he is a controller of his organs, Indr, muttaqī, in Our System, he can’t get affluence, ‘rayim’, independently.

Even he has to get it through Agni, ‘Agninā rayimashnavat’.

One can easily see that even being an Indr, muttaqī, in Our System, is an inferior stage than being Agni, a person vowed to spread light everywhere, aqāmat-e-dīn/Dharmsantānam/Dharmsansthāpan .

After all, what is the use of being an Indr, muttaqī, in Our System, if the person is not using it in spreading Our light everywhere, aqāmat-e-dīn/Dharmsantānam/Dharmsansthāpan .

Controlling one’s organs, being an Indr, muttaqī, in Our System, is not the goal of life in itself, neither it can be for any intelligent person.

It is only a means to attain the Mission of life/existence, Kr’ñvanto Vishvamāryam/aqāmat-e-dīn/Dharmsantānam/Dharmsansthāpan .

3. ‘Poshamév’.

This affluence, ‘rayim’ that you get through Agni, ‘Agninā rayimashnavat’, is actually not only affluence, ‘rayim’.

It is a shield actually that protects and strengthen you.

One may question that if it is so, why some of the followers of Us, could not get protected even while they are true to their conviction to Trishapt/Sapt Maryādās too.

This question is actually not based on true status of the facts.

Hinduism/Vedic Movement is based on two Mantrs, basically.

‘Dhiyo yo nah prachodayāt’.
‘Yāthātathyatah’.

Can you guarantee that your question is based on these two Mantrs?

Are all the persons concerned really Indr and Agni?

Do all of them are really dedicated to Kr’ñvanto Vishvamāryam/Dharmsantānam/Dharmsansthāpan?

If so, you’d never find that such is the case.

True Hinduism according to Ved is not now in the life of Indian Hindus.

What they are following is only a rotten shadow of True Hinduism according to Ved.

Yet, you can easily see India is still a Soné kī Chiđiyā, a Golden Bird.

The anti Hindus are pillaging India for more than thousand years now.

Yet you can see the affluence here is as if infinite.

The more the anti Hindus loot India, the more We are unleashing for Our present followers if they really follow Us.

Even the dacoits and thieves are defeated as if they are Duhshāsan and the affluence, ‘rayim’, for Our followers is the cloth of Draupadī, even they can’t pull off absolutely.

What more practical proof/evidence you need for the truth of this very third Vedmantr?

4. ‘divé dive’.

Isn’t what is said in the previous footnote is

even more than enough to prove it too?

5. ‘Yashasam’.

Through Agni, ‘Agninā’, one does not have affluence only.

Through Agni, ‘Agninā’, one does not have it day by day, ‘divé dive’ only.

Through Agni, ‘Agninā’, one gets fame, ‘Yashasam’ too.

Don’t think that the fame is not useful to you in any way, and you damn care even if you get it ever or not.

Of course, you should never care for it, if it costs you your Hindutv or self-respect.

Both your Hindutv and your self-respect are more precious things for you than your fame, ‘Yashasam’.

You can obtain your fame, ‘Yashasam’ even through your Hindutv or self-respect.

But you can’t get your Hindutv or self-respect through your fame, ‘Yashasam’ ever.

Consequently, your fame, ‘Yashasam’, is never important for you more than your Hindutv or self-respect.

But if you have your Hindutv and self-respect already, your fame, ‘Yashasam’, is very helpful for you to live life easily and magnificently.

Never think to live your life easily and magnificently is a sin even infinitesimally.

It is never a sin if you can manage it to have with your Hindutv and self-respect too.

Of course, you should never bargain for it with your Hindutv or self-respect.

Your Hindutv and your self-respect are ever far more precious for you than to live your life easily and magnificently.

But if you can manage to live your life easily and magnificently with your Hindutv and self-respect too, why shouldn’t you do it?

We are never against you for living your life easily and magnificently.

We are never jealous of you for it.

And why should We?

It’s always helpful in Kr’ñvanto Vishvamāryam.

When even the Vr’trs see that you are living your life easily and magnificently with your Hindutv and self-respect too, they can think to have it too.

They may decide to obey Us themselves.

6. ‘vīrvattamam’.

Fullest of the brave ones.

Any other system, whatsoever it maybe, can never guarantee you it.

It is Our System, Hindutv only that can guarantee you to live your life easily and magnificently with your Hindutv and self-respect too, with extremely full of the brave ones.

Being extremely full of brave ones makes your life far easier and magnificent.

Why shouldn’t you have it if you can manage it?

We are not against the comforts and luxuries of life for you.

Instead, We always want you to have it if you can manage to have them with your Hindutv and self-respect too.

Only your Hindutv and self-respect are the things We never want you to lose.

R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 5| Mantr 3

——————————————————————————

9. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 6

10. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 7

11. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 8

12.R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 9

55. Atharv Ved: Kaand 14| Sookt 1| Mantr 22

56.Atharv Ved: Kaand 14| Sookt 2| Mantr 25

Filed under: Behavioural Science, Commentary on Ved, debate on Hinduism, DSM Satyarthi, Eternity, Hinduism, Humanity, R'gved, Religion, Rigveda, Social Sciences, Ved, Ved Bhashy, Vedas

Par updésh kushal bahutéré

Durgesh — Tue, 05 Jul 2011 00:51:33 +0000

Par updésh kushal bahutéré

There are so many persons experts in preaching others

DSM Satyarthi

When Pakistan was being fought for, there was one great Muslim who was sincerely and untiringly fighting against it, while even Bharat Ratn Dr. BR Ambedkar had written laboriously ‘Pakistan or Partition of India’ in the favor of Pakistan.

That great Muslim was Maulana Saiyad Abul Åālā Maudūdī raħamatullah ålayhi.

He argued:

‘Until and unless we don’t develop a true Muslim character in ourselves, it is dangerous for Islam even, to have our own country’.

How right the great man^rħ was.

Let’s watch a video what a character a Mufti has now developed in the so-called Pakistan:

Pakistani actress lays it out for a mullah live on national TV!

What a character!

What a sense of justice!

Is it what they fought for?

Is it they killed thousands of persons for?

Rape with children in Madarsas?

Incredible?

But true, isn’t it?

—————————————————————————————————

More on Islam from DSM Satyarthi:

1. Bal huv qur’anum majeedun fe LAUHIM MAHFOOZIN

2. Innahu laquranun kareemun Fee kitabin maknoonin

3. ‘Hudallilmuttaqeen’: ‘Guidance for controllers of organs’: 2 Al Baqarah: 2

4. ‘Alaa qalbik litakoon minal-munzireen’ ‘upon your heart one of who to warn’

5. Muslimahs! Come to India. I recommend Hindu lovers for all the Muslimahs.: Khadeejah Muhammad

6. Islam according to Qur’an and Maulana Maududi rahamatullh alaihi

7. A Moment of grave thinking for the entire sophisticated Muslim Community

8. ‘SET THIS WOMAN for WELL DOER’: ‘Imaam naareem Sukr’te dadhaat’

9. ‘V’ innahu fe UMMALKITAABI ladainaa la’liyyun hakeemun’: 43/4

10. Most Present day Muslms don’t do what Huzoor(SAW) did:

11. The Muslim beauties are wooing Hindu men FASTEST

12. ‘What really matters in the sight of God’: Maulana: Maududi

13. Why did Islam face a counter revolution at Karbala?

14. Why there are differences among us?

15. No differences Please!

16. Llā yamassuhu illā almutahharūn

17. Fa’in kħiftum allā tådilū fa wāħidatan

18. Islam according to Ved

19. Wa in tusliħū wa tattaqū: And if you correct and control yourself

20. Par updésh kushal bahutéré

———————————————————————-

3. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 5| Mantr 3

9. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 6

10. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 7

11. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 8

12.R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 9

55. Atharv Ved: Kaand 14| Sookt 1| Mantr 22

56.Atharv Ved: Kaand 14| Sookt 2| Mantr 25

Filed under: Ashvinatam, Ashvinatam Sex, Ashvinatam yugal, Behavioural Science, debate on Islam, DSM Satyarthi, Entertainment, Entertainment with a difference, Eternity, Feminism, Hinduism, Humanity, Islam, Maulana Maududi, Muslim Feminism, Pakistani Feminism, Pakistani girls, Pakistani women, Politics, Religion, Social Sciences, Terrorism, Towards understaning the Qur'an, Women in Islam

The Star of the Millennium: Amitabh Bachchan

Durgesh — Tue, 28 Jun 2011 23:49:58 +0000

The Star of the Millennium:

Amitabh Bachchan

And his heroines

DSM Satyarthi

When he worked with Rajesh Khanna in Anand, none had anticipated he would successfully cross every boundary of stardom, yet he did.

His heroines range from heroines of yesteryears to those of present day even.

Waheedah Rehman, Sairah Bano, Tabbu and Jiah Khan, all are his heroines.

Waheedah Rehman has pride of working with our Star of the Millennium, Amitabh Bachchan, in Mahaan and Adalat, as his heroine.

1. Jidhar dekhoon teri tasveer nazar aati hai

2. Humka aisa vaisa na samjho, hum bade kaam ki chiz

Sairah Bano also succeeded in being his heroine in two films, Hera Pheri and Zameer.

3. Kaun anjam-e-ulfat nahin janta?

4. Tum bhi chalo, hum bhi chalen,

5. Phoolon ke dere hain

6. Tum bhi chalo, hum bhi chalen

7. Zindagi hansne gaane ke liye hai

It was a tragedy Amitabh Mumtaz were teamed only in one film, Bandhe Haath.

8. Yeh kaun aaj aaya mera dil churane?

9. Dekho ye mere bandhe haath

The most successful pair of Amitabh was with Parveen Bobby.

Even Zeenat Aman could not cross its success.

Zeenat Aman was Amitabh’s heroine in six films:

Lawaris

Don

The great gambler

Dostana

Mahaan

Pukar:

10. Kaahe paise pe itna ghuroor kare hai?

11. Kabke bichhde hue

12. Apni to jaise taise

13. Are diwano, mujhe pahchano

14. Jiska mujhe tha intezar

15. Khai ke paan Banaras wala

16. Yeh mera dil pyar ka deewana

17. Tum kitne din baad mile

18. O diwano, dil sambhalo

19. Do lafzon ki hai dil ki kahani

20. Bahut khoobsoorat jawan ek ladki

21. Dillagi ne di hawa

22. Mere dost, qissa ye kya ho gaya?

23. Aadhi baat ho chuki

24. Pyar mein dil pe maar de goli

25. Asli kya hai, naqli kya hai

26. Samundar mein nahake aur bhi namkeen ho gai ho

Parveen Bobby succeeded in working with Amitabh in Nine films:

Amar Akbar Anthony

Mahan

Kala Patthar

However, in last three films, she was teamed with Shashi Kapoor, instead of with Amitabh Bachchan.

27. Kabhi sochta hoon

28. Sanam, tum jahan, mera dil wahan

29. Tum sath ho jab apne

30. Jabse tumko dekha

31. Angrezi mein kahte hain ki

32. Mach gaya shor sari nagri re

33. My name is Anthony Gonsalves

34. Humko tumse ho gaya hai pyar

35. Anhoni ko honi kar den

—————————————————————————————————————————————

More audio musical blogs from DSM Satyarthi:

1. Zindagi, aa raha hoon main

2. Zindagi ik safar hai suhana

3. Jo tum hansoge

4. Har Chehrā yahān chānd to har zarrā sitarā

6. Socha tha pyar hum na karenge

7. The Star of the millennium: Amitabh Bachchan

Filed under: Ashvinatam yugal, Behavioural Science, DSM Satyarthi, Entertainment, Entertainment with a difference, Humanity

Socha tha pyar hum na karenge

Durgesh — Fri, 24 Jun 2011 13:49:13 +0000

Socha tha pyar hum na karenge

an interesting audio musical blog:

Just listen to, and enjoy

Click the links to some popular songs, in an interesting specific sequence. It is said that Mukesh is the tragedy king in singers. Hear these songs, and decide yourself wasn’t he very good in serious romantic songs more?

DSM Satyarthi

1. Nazar nazar se ho rahi hai bat pyar ki

2.Kyon jhuki jhuki hain palken?

3.Do qadam tum bhi chalo, do qadam hum bhi chalen

4.Chori chori jo tumse mili to log kya kahenge?

5. Socha tha pyar hum na karenge

6. Ik manzil raahi do, phir pyar na kaise ho?

7.Humsafar, mere humsafar, pankh tum parvaz hum

8.Tumhari mast nazar gar idhar nahin hoti

9.Yeh wada karen, jahan bhi rahen,

10.Dil ki nazar se, nazaron ki dil se, yeh baat kya hai?

11.Duniya walon se door, jalne walon se door,

12.Teri shokh nazar ka ishara

13.Saiyan chhod de baiyan, mori patli kalaiyan,

14.Tum roothi raho, main manata rahoon

15. Ik raat mein do do chaand khile

16. Ibtada-e-ishq men hum sari rat jage

17.Kuchh aese bandhan hote hain

18.Jume ki rat ho ya din jumerat ka

19.Mehtab tera chehra

21. Mere sapnon ki rani, kab ayegi tu

22. Hum tujh se muhabbat karke, Sanam!

23. Bol meri taqdeer men kya hai, mere humsafar ab to bata

24. Ansu bhari hain yeh jivan ki rahen

25.O Shama, mujhe phoonk de

26. Tera jana, dil ke armanon ka lut jana

27. Sab kuchh sikha humne, na sikhi hoshiyari

28.Phool ahista phenko

29. Tum aa gaye ho, noor aa gaya hai

30. Tumhari bhi jai jai

31. Dekh chand ki ore

32. Bhigi bhigi raton men

—————————————————————————————————————————————

More audio musical blogs from DSM Satyarthi:

1. Zindagi, aa raha hoon main

2. Zindagi ik safar hai suhana

3. Jo tum hansoge

4. Har Chehrā yahān chānd to har zarrā sitarā

6. Socha tha pyar hum na karenge

Filed under: Audio Musical Blog, DSM Satyarthi

Main jahān chalā jāūn, bahār chalī āyé

Durgesh — Thu, 23 Jun 2011 12:14:20 +0000

Main jahān chalā jāūn,

bahār chalī āyé

an interesting audio musical blog:

Just listen to, and enjoy

Click the links to some popular songs, in an interesting specific sequence. It is said that Mukesh is the tragedy king in singers. Hear these songs, and decide yourself why our tragedy king, Dilip Kumar, chose Muhammad Rafi as his voice, instead of Mukesh.

I think great Muhammad Rafi has given us more immortal tragedy songs than Mukesh even.

Enjoy the songs as if an audio story, implying an alogether different sense:

DSM Satyarthi

1. Main nigahen tere chehre se hataun kaise

2. Boojh mera kya naam re

3. Haal kya hai dilon ka na poochho , sanam!

4.Yahi hai tamanna tere dar ke samne

6. Kahin pe nigahen kahin pe nishana

7. Tere mere sapne ab ek rang hain

8.Na jane din kaise jivan men aaye hain

9. Kabhi aar kabhi paar laaga teer-e-nazar

10. Turururu turururu tera mera pyar shuru

11. Shayad meri shadi ka khayal dil men aya hai

12.Dil jo na kah saka

13. Dil se dil milne ka koi kaaran hoga

14.Man re tu kahe na dhir dhare

15. Gadi wale gadi dhire haank re

16.Rang aur noor ki barat kise pesh karoon?

17. Dukh bhare din bite re bhaiya

18. Din dhal jaye haye raat na jaye

19. Jaane kaise kab kahan iqrar ho gaya

20. Yeh duniya yeh mahfil mere kaam ki nahin

21. Phool jahan jahan bahar wahan

22. Yaad na jaaye bite dinon ki

23. Yeh samjho aur samjhao

24. Patthar ke sanam, tujhe humne

25. Koi maane ya na maane

26. Kah do koi na kare yahan pyar

27. Pyar hi jine ki soorat hai

28. Jo guzar rahi hai mujh par use kaise main bataaoon

29. Mohabbat bade kaam ki cheez hai

30. Aaj madhosh hua jaye re

—————————————————————————————————————————————

More audio musical blogs from DSM Satyarthi:

1. Zindagi, aa raha hoon main

2. Zindagi ik safar hai suhana

3. Jo tum hansoge

4. Har Chehrā yahān chānd to har zarrā sitarā

1. Why can’t we love each other?: Innallāh yuħibbul muttaqīn

Filed under: Ashvinatam, Ashvinatam yugal, Audio Musical Blog

How to establish ‘Rām Rājý’/ Ħukūmat-e-Ilāhī/The Kingdom of God

Durgesh — Sun, 19 Jun 2011 06:17:42 +0000

How to establish ‘Rām Rājý’/

Ħukūmat-e-Ilāhī/The Kingdom of

God

DSM Satyarthi

The basic question arises, when we talk of establishing ‘Rām Rājý’/ Ħukūmat-e-Ilāhī/ the Kingdom of God, is why an atheist must be interested in it.

If you please forgive me for my bluntness and bitter truth, I want to ask a question myself.

Why is an atheist afraid of it so much?

The atheists are not in majority on the Globe.

Then why do they expect the Hindus/the Musalmīn/the Christians/the Jews/the Pārasīs to surrender to them?

Why do they want to rule on the entire Hindus/ Musalmīn/ Christians/ Jews/ Pārasīs?

Isn’t it itself wrong on its face?

—————————————————————————————–

More thought provoking articles from DSM Satyarthi:

2. Should we advocate abolishing religion from planet earth?

3. Does religion provide false security?

4. Polygamy: a discarded system of life

5. The hidden agenda of Congress

6.No danger from RSS. The real danger is from anti Hindus

7. Voting for a satellite government?

———————————————————————————

1. ‘Bhoorbhuvah svah!’ ‘The Existence! The Consciousness! The Bliss!’

2.‘Devasy’ pashy’ kaavyam, n’ mamaar, n’ jeeryati.’

3. Hinduism shines

4.Ved is the eternal law book having infinite knowledge in it for human beings

5. ‘According to facts’: ‘Yaathaatathyatah’

6. ‘SET THIS WOMAN for WELL DOER’: ‘Imaam naareem Sukr’te dadhaat’

7. The Evernew Hinduism: Yaathaatathyatah: Ved 2|40|8

8. ‘How to cross death’: ‘Tamev viditvaati mr’tyumeti’: Ved2Yajurved|31|18

9. According to Hinduism: We must be polite, not coward

10.Ye yathaa maam prapadyante taanstathaiv bhajaamyaham: Lord Kr’shn

11. N’ karm lipyaté naré

—————————————————————————————————

More on Islam from DSM Satyarthi:

1. Bal huv qur’anum majeedun fe LAUHIM MAHFOOZIN

2. Innahu laquranun kareemun Fee kitabin maknoonin

3. ‘Hudallilmuttaqeen’: ‘Guidance for controllers of organs’: 2 Al Baqarah: 2

4. ‘Alaa qalbik litakoon minal-munzireen’ ‘upon your heart one of who to warn’

5. Muslimahs! Come to India. I recommend Hindu lovers for all the Muslimahs.: Khadeejah Muhammad

6. Islam according to Qur’an and Maulana Maududi rahamatullh alaihi

7. A Moment of grave thinking for the entire sophisticated Muslim Community

8. ‘SET THIS WOMAN for WELL DOER’: ‘Imaam naareem Sukr’te dadhaat’

9. ‘V’ innahu fe UMMALKITAABI ladainaa la’liyyun hakeemun’: 43/4

10. Most Present day Muslms don’t do what Huzoor(SAW) did:

11. The Muslim beauties are wooing Hindu men FASTEST

12. ‘What really matters in the sight of God’: Maulana: Maududi

13. Why did Islam face a counter revolution at Karbala?

14. Why there are differences among us?

15. No differences Please!

16. Llā yamassuhu illā almutahharūn

———————————————————————-

More Commentary on Ved from DSM Satyarthi:

3. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 5| Mantr 3

13. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 58| Mantr 6

9. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 6

10. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 7

11. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 8

12.R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 9

14. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 164| Mantr 20

15. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 164| Mantr 46

16. R’gved: Mandal 2| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

17 R’gved: Mandal 3| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

18. R’gved: Mandal 3| Sookt 6| Mantr 2

19. R’gved: Mandal 4| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

20. R’gved: Mandal 4| Sookt 26| Mantr 2

21. R’gved: Mandal 5| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

22. R’gved: Mandal 6| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

23. R’gved: Mandal 7| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

24. R’gved: Mandal 8| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

25. R’gved: Mandal 9| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

26. R’gved: Mandal 9| Sookt 63| Mantr 4-5

27. R’gved: Mandal 10| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

28. R’gved: Mandal 10| Sookt 85| Mantr 42

29. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 1| Mantr 1

30. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 1| Mantr 2

31. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 1| Mantr 3

32. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 1| Mantr 4

33. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 11| Mantr 1

34. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 13| Mantr 4

35. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 23| Mantr 3

36. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 31| Mantr 18

37. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 40| Mantr2

38. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 40| Mantr8

39. Saamved: Mantr 1

40. Sāmved: Mantr 115

41. Sāmved: Mantr 641: Mahānāmnyārchik| 1

42. Sāmved: Mantr 650: Mahānāmnyārchik| 10

43. Sāmved: Mantr 651: Uttarārchik

44. Atharv Ved: Kaand 1| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

45. Atharv Ved: Kānd 3| Sookt 30| Mantr 3

46. Atharv Ved: Kānd 3| Sookt 30| Mantr 4

47. Atharv Ved: Kānd 3| Sookt 30| Mantr 6

48. Atharv Ved: Kānd 4| Sookt 4| Mantr 6

49. Atharv Ved: Kānd 4| Sookt 4| Mantr 7

50. Atharv Ved: Kānd 4| Sookt 4| Mantr 8

51. Atharv Ved: Kaand 4| Sookt 13| Mantr 1

52. Atharv Ved: Kaand 8| Sookt 1| Mantr 6

53. Atharv Ved: Kaand 8| Sookt 4| Mantr 22

54. Atharv Ved: Kaand 14| Sookt 1| Mantr 22

55.Atharv Ved: Kaand 14| Sookt 2| Mantr 25

Filed under: Arab Politics, Aryan Invasion Theory, Atharv Ved, Atharva Veda, Behavioural Science, Christianity, debate on Hinduism, debate on Islam, DSM Satyarthi, Eternity, Hinduism, History, Humanity, Islam, Khulfa-e-Rashideen, Maulana Maududi, Muhammad, Political Scandals, Politics, Qur'an, R'gved, Religion, Rigveda, Samved, Samveda, Sir Muhammad Iqbal, Social Sciences, Terrorism, Ved, Ved Bhashy, Vedas, Women in Islam, Yajurved, Yajurveda

Ved: Ved Bhāshý: R’gved: Mandal 1: Sūkt 33: Mantr 2

Durgesh — Thu, 09 Jun 2011 11:49:44 +0000

Ved: 1 R’gved:

Mandal 1| Sūkt 33|Mantr 2

Ashŧak 1| Adhyāý 3| Anuvāk 1| Varg 1

DSM Satyarthi

—————-—————————————————————————————————–

Upédaham dhanadāmapratītam jushŧām n’ shyéno vasatim patāmi.

Indram namasyannupmébirarkairyah stotr’bhyo havyo asti yāman.

—————————————————————————————-

—————————————————————————————-

¹Only through worship² I reach³ that gives wealth⁴, invincible⁵, the one who is used with love⁶, nest⁷ as if hawk⁸.

Respecting the controller of organs, with comparable suns⁹, who is able to self sacrifice¹⁰, for the persons that offer Stavans¹¹, in the way¹².

————————————————————————————–

1. R’shi: Hirañyastūp Mahimvat Āngiras

Dévtā/Divine Subject: Indr, the controller of organs.

Chhand/Meter: Nichr’t Trishŧup

Svar: Dhaivat

2. ‘up it’ in original rext.

3. ‘patāmi’ in original text.

4. ‘dhanadām’ in original text.

I reach individually, not because We are the

Creator, but because We are interested in her individually.

‘Dhanadām’ in original text is in feminine gender.

I never reach individually to a woman, even if she gives wealth, who does not worship.

Never forget Ved is a book of movement.

It does not want to create a nation.

It wants to federate nations instead.

It wants to federate the entire infinite creations even.

It does not want to destroy your individuality.

On the contrary, it wants to develop and evolve your individuality instead.

Hinduism is actually a federation of infinite individualities.

These infinite individualities are federated here for their own benefits, achieving their goals in such a way that none of others is harmed.

Yes, it is possible.

How?

Ved answers this question principally and Our eternal Ācharañ Nāyak, Param Purush, answers this question practically.

The persons who think this movement is true and practical, but can’t/don’t join it due to their various individual reasons feel shame in not joining it.

So, they join the wicked persons knowingly or unknowingly.

They never talk on Hinduism rationally.

They tell Hinduism maybe right but Hindus are not.

Well, they know very well that they are not being called to be what the other Hindus are.

They are being called to join a movement.

What is the rational behind claiming that a movement is right, but he/she is not joining it because the other persons in the movement are not true to their convictions?

Even if they are not, are you?

It maybe that they are not true to their convictions, but it is the same with you too.

The kettle is calling the pot black.

Haven’t you yourself accepted that the movement is right?

Then isn’t it your own conviction?

Are you true to it?

‘I reach individually to a woman, who gives wealth, if she worships’ ‘Upédaham dhanadām patāmi’, means her giving wealth is not enough for Us to reach her.

She may be giving wealth to others.

She may be even giving wealth to Our movement, Our mission of life/existence, Kr’ñvanto Vishvamāryam.

But she does not have proper training for using Our grace she gets thus, to develop and evolve herself and others correctly.

So, it may be even harmful to her.

Our shaktipāt, Our grace, Our energy is only available to a person who takes proper training for using it correctly.

Of course, she could get financial benefits by giving wealth thus.

But there is a vast difference in getting financial benefits from Us and getting Shaktipāt from Us.

5. ‘Invincible’, ‘Apratītam’.

This is one of the other benefits she may get, but not Shaktipāt however.

6. ‘Jushŧām’ in original text.

It is the second benefit she may get, but not Shaktipāt however, until and unless she doesn’t take proper training for it.

We don’t want the persons to be able to purchase Shaktipāt.

It cannot be purchased anyhow.

Even if a person gives every individual penny s/he has, s/he cannot purchase Our Shaktipāt.

S/he can get it through proper training and through proper training only.

It is Our System We have established for the benefits of Sukr’ts, and it cannot be changed, amended or destroyed.

You are allowed to fight against it, change it, amend it and even destroy it if you want.

But the history of humankind till now is in evidence that no such persons ever succeeded in changing, amending or in destroying it.

The Rāxas societies in the leaderships of Hirañý Kashipu, Hirañyāx, and Rāvañ etc. tried their best to do it.

Where are those Rāxas societies today?

The Pārsīs rejected Our system of Kr’ñvanto Vishvamāryam.

They called themselves Pārsīs attributing Hindus sex obsessed primitive pagans.

When they started, they established their own vast empire even, gradually, eventually.

But they couldn’t face the Islamic aggression.

Why?

If they were really Pāras, the stone that converted irons into gold, why couldn’t they convert the Musalmīn as well?

At least they should have saved their own identity and their own homeland.

Why they had to resort to the homeland of the primitive sex obsessed Hindus they despised so much?

The same Islam, with all of its aggression attacked the homeland of the primitive sex obsessed Hindus too.

What could it get?

Only Pakistan that too was divided into Bangladesh and Pakistan soon.

Doesn’t it prove that Our system to protect Sukr’ts is infallible?

7. ‘Vasatim’ in original text.

I never reach any dhanadā even, if she is not in a nest.

Our system does not accept the nestlessness of a woman even if she worships Us and gives wealth to Our cause.

It is not enough for a woman.

A nestless woman is open to the selfish and wicked ones.

We give her at least parents.

She cannot be nestless until and unless she refuses their patronage, or they are dead.

Even if her parents are dead, she must approach to a Sukr’t, or a society of Sukr’ts.

It is impossible there isn’t even one Sukr’t anywhere.

Param Purush is always there.

One may say that Param Purush does not exist, but then Our system also does not exist because it is based on Ved, and Ved acknowledges the immortal existence of Param Purush.

‘Védāhamétam Purusham mahāntamāditývarñam tamasah parastāt.

Tamév viditvāti mr’tyuméti nānyah panthā vidyaté’yanāý.’

¹I KNOW this man², the END of greatness³/the great End⁴, to be chosen⁵/having color LIKE SUN, BEYOND THE REACH OF DARKNESS.
KNOWING ONLY HIM, one crosses death.
There isn’t another way to live the life.’

—Ved: 2 Yajurvéd: 31|18

8. ‘N’ Shyéno ’’ in original text.

It is believed that ‘Shyén’, hawk/eagle, is the utmost sexiest among birds.

I reach ‘dhanadām’, the woman that gives wealth, invincible, the one who is used with love, ‘I reach nest as if hawk/eagle^’ ‘Upédaham dhanadāmapratītam jushŧām n’ shyéno vasatim patāmi’ does mean that it is Our own responsibility, a woman must get optimum love and sex.

It’s her ‘Bhog’ she must get from Us.

It’s Our duty to provide her what she needs.

Naturally, the ‘Purush’ We have made, for it, is made quite capable to do it.

In his absence, Hindu Vishv must arrange accordingly optimum, as Hindu Vishv represents both Us and him, if he is not present somewhere.

Hindu Vishv, if it is really Hindu Vishv, can’t run away from its responsibility We have ordered here.

After its duties towards Our Ācharañ Nāyak/Vishvarshi/Hindu Vishv itself, the utmost prior duties the Hindu Vishv has to pay its attention to, is to arrange so that no woman is available to any wicked.

It must arrange and manage that every Sukr’t must be as if a hawk/eagle in this matter.

He must never hate sex/women.

We know the so-called cultured persons say it is itself wicked to think of sex even.

But this Mantr wants you to decide who will decide your system and mission of life and existence.

You cannot tolerate it any more.

How can you be a cultured person, a gentleman, a lady, if you cannot provide a woman even a Sukr’t husband?

Isn’t it the everfirst duty of an actual gentleman and an actual lady?

How can you bear that a woman is forced to transfer a wicked’s wickedness to the next generation?

And if you bear it, how you can be a gentleman or a lady actually?

Of course, the wicked ones and the fools would never agree to it.

But why do you too?

If they don’t care what you want, why do you care what they want?

Is their conviction to wickedness is more intense than your own conviction to humanity/Us?

If it is, should it be ever?

Should you ever be less convicted to humanity/Us than the wicked ones are convicted to their vile selfish wickedness even?

And if it is so, are you really a gentleman/lady?

And if it is so, who should improve him/herself?

We know, some of you want to avoid conflicts with the wicked ones.

But the wicked ones don’t want to avoid conflicts with you on the cost of their wickedness.

Do you want to avoid conflicts with the wicked ones on the cost of your humanity?

Then humanity can never win.

How the humanity can ever win on the wickedness, if its followers always surrender to the wicked ones?

Such coward persons can never run Our movement of Kr’ñvanto Vishvamāryam.

Hinduism is a movement of the brave persons, not that of cowards.

You can’t make all better, ‘Kr’ñvanto Vishvamāryam’, until and unless you don’t augment Indr, the controller of organs, urging the utmost beautiful girls and young ladies:

‘Été asr’gramāshavo’ti hvarānsi babhravah, Somā r’tasý dhārayā.

Indram vardhanto apturah Kr’ñvanto vishvamāryam,

Apaghnanto arāvñah.’

‘These Swift flowing tawny colored Som, with a stream of eternal truth, let loose/proceed, augmenting Indr, urging the utmost beautiful young girls and ladies,making all better, destroying the withholders.’

—–Ved: 1 R’gved: 9|63|4-5

You should never forget that to make all better, Kr’ñvanto Vishvamāryam’, it is not enough to be an Ārý, a better person, only.

You have to augment, expand Indr too, ‘indram vardhantah’.

Until and unless you don’t augment indr, ‘indram vardhantah’, you cannot complete your mission of life/existence.

You have to provide enough indrs to the women so that none of them has to surrender to any wicked, ‘apturah’.

Don’t listen to the wicked ones who criticize that no religion must do this.

And if Hinduism/Ved does it as a mission of life/existence, Hinduism/Ved is not a religion.

The wicked ones have to adopt this attitude for their own survival.

Do you want the survival of the wicked ones, keeping them wicked?

If not, how can you surrender to their selfish and vile wishes ever, at all?

They can adopt any attitude whatsoever they may see fit.

How can you?

9. ‘Indram namasyan up’mébhih arkaih’ in

original text.

‘Comparable suns’ ‘up’mébhih arkaih’ is said as a figure of speech here.

You have to study, peruse and even analyze the history of the persons who have already done it in the past.

Naturally, you have to face almost the same problems they had to face.

Yet, never forget, the path of ‘Kr’ñvanto Vishvamāryam’ is never always full of invincible problems.

The wicked ones are never absolutely invincibles.

Of course, Lord Ram had to face a great difficult forest life for fourteen years continuously because the wicked ones were more powerful then, for that particular period.

But, after those fourteen years, Lord Ram had never to see backward.

It’s similar with every one of our obedients who either wants to be an Indr, a controller of organs, or has achieved to be the same.

So many of the persons lose their courage when they see the difficulties of the path of Kr’ñvanto Vishvamāryam.

Yet, they forget it’s only primary stage.

After some time, when the wicked lose their power to the nobles/Sukr’ts, the Sukr’ts have never to see backwards, if they really follow Our System, as inteligentally as they should.

The wicked can never win indefinitely in Our System if the Sukr’ts do really follow Our System We have given them in Ved.

‘Indram namasyan up’mébhih arkaih’ means you can’t do it dishonoring and disrespecting the Indrs.

It is Our surefire System in Our infinite creations, that the persons who don’t control their organs, anindrs, can’t win over the persons who control their organs, Indrs.

The System never allows the ultimate defeat of an Indr, even in this physical material world.

If it were possible, communism did not have to lose its power within such a short time as seventy-two years only.

But the condition is, you have to follow the‘Comparable suns’ ‘up’mébhih arkaih’ ‘respecting the persons who control their organs.

You have to progress.

Our System is Progressive.

‘Indr préhi purastvam.’

‘Controller of organs, you keep marching ahead.’

— Ved: 4 Atharv Ved: 20|5|3

There are so many persons who believe that the path of Kr’ñvanto Vishvamāryam is always full of sacrifices and sacrifices only.

You have even to die for it.

There aren’t any sweet fruits for you in it in this physical world.

You would get them only after you die, in heaven.

No.

They are quite mistaken.

If what they hold is true, it means all the comforts and luxuries of this physical world are only for the persons who don’t do Kr’ñvanto Vishvamāryam, ever.

Is it possible?

You have to sacrifice in this path only till your collective Shaktimān is not greater than the collective Shaktimān of vr’trs/dushkr’ts/ the wicked ones.

Once you cross them in your collective Shaktimān, there maybe some of you who don’t have their proper individual Shaktimān who still have to sacrifice somewhat longer, but not all of you.

Wickedness can’t win indefinitely on nobility in Our System spread all over in Our infinite creations.

We haven’t made Our infinite creations for the comforts and luxuries of the wicked ones.

They win on the Sukr’ts only when the Sukr’ts follow their own childish systems.

They don’t get guidance from Our Immortal Constitution.

Well, that’s their own fault.

They are given absolute freedom even to reject Us, abuse Us, reject Our Immortal Constitution, and do anything whatsoever they damn please.

We haven’t created infinite creations to exhibit Our almightiness.

We don’t need it.

Aren’t We almighty irrespective of anyone’s acceptance of it?

The people conceive erroneous ideas about Us and expect Us to follow them.

If We do really exist why should We do it?

And if We don’t exist as some of you think in their childish ignorance why should even then We do it?

10. ‘Havyo asti’.

No indefinite self-sacrifice is necessary, never forget.

You have to do it only till your individual Shaktimān doesn’t cross the collective Shaktimān of the wicked ones, and/or your imaginations, your mind, your brain and your heart is not purified optimum.

Once your individual Shaktimān has crossed this point, you would never have to see backwards.

Never learn anything about Us and Our Immortal Constitution from the persons who don’t themselves learn from Our Immortal Constitution.

How can We held responsible for their own childish ideas?

Haven’t We revealed Our Immortal Constitution for people?.

11. ‘Stotr’bhyah’.

^‘Only through worship² I reach³for the persons that offer Stavans^’‘Upédaham patāmi stotr’bhyah’ is an important revelation.

It explains why do We reach individually even a woman that gives wealth for Our cause, even if she does not offer Stavans to Us.

Even it is done for the persons that offer Stavans^{’ ‘}stotr’bhyah’, not for the persons who don’t offer Stavans to Us.

One may say why this condition is necessary if We don’t want Us praised.

But the question itself explains that neither the person asking this question has offered any Stavan ever to Us nor s/he does understand what a Stavan is.

Stavan is not Our praise even infinitesimally.

It contains two main parts.

The first part is Meditation.

It unites your infinite etheric bodies in one united brain mentally.

It enhances your energy, collecting it, at a place.

It unites your diversified imaginations, ideas, thoughts, knowledge and plans into one unified entity, enhancing their intensity:

‘Tīvr samvégānāmāsannah.’

—Pātanjal Yogdarshanam: Samādhipād 21

‘Mr’dumadhýādhimātratvāttato’pi vishéshah’

—Pātanjal Yogdarshanam: Samādhipād 22

Moreover, it synchronizes your brain with the Universal eternal facts, the persons present where you are and the entire infinite creations.

The second part of the Stavan is, understanding what’s taken in it.

It distributes the shaktipāt, received in Meditation, properly, in your body, to its proper places.

12. ‘Only through worship² I reach in the way’ ‘Upédaham patāmi yāman’ does mean I do it only when a person, the woman giving the wealth, does it in Our path:

‘Nānyah panthā vidyaté’ýnāý’.

‘No other way does exist to live the life.’

—Ved: 2 Yajurvéd: 31|18

If she does not do it in Our path, We never reach her, whatsoever wealth she may spend anywhere.

—————————————————————————————-
More Commentary on Ved from DSM Satyarthi:

3. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 5| Mantr 3