O Om ishé tvorjjé tvā vāyavasth’ devo vah savitā prārpayatu shréshŧhtamāý karmañ āpyāyadhvamaghnyā’indrāy’ bhāgam prajāvatīranamīvā’ayaxmā mā v’ sten eishat māghshagvagvonso dhruvā’asmin gopatau syāt bahvīryajmaanasý pashūnpāhi.
1. 1Om! For food2/the will power3,thee4 . For energy,thee5 . Breezes are ye6. Divine Creator impel, you all7, to noblest work8. Complete properly9, Inviolable female10! share for the controller of organs11. Rich in offspring/subject12.Free from sickness13. Free from diminishing14. No thief rule on you, no evil-praiser15. Be constant in this master of ‘go’16, numerous females17! Guard the cattle of the worshiper18.
The Param Purush/the absolute man is Paraméshŧhī. He has been nominated by Eishān Param Brahm Paramātmā Himself, to play the same role in the democratic system of all His infinite creations, as the President plays in a Parliamentary Democratic System.
But there are some differences too:
A. He is nominated, not chosen, as it is required in a Parliamentary Democratic System.
B. His authority can be challenged in the Supreme Court of Eishān Param Brahm Paramātmā only, nowhere else.
C. The persons who are atheists have nothing to complain, as they don’t believe in the Existence of Eishān Param Brahm Paramātmā Himself. They have not to believe in the existence of Param Purush too, similarly.
Eishān Param Brahm Paramātmā is Almighty.
E. Param Purush is immortal, while the other Presidents are not.
These forty chapters are grouped in two groups of twenty chapters each.
The first group is called ‘Poorv Vinshati’, and the second one is called ‘Uttar Vinshati’.
‘Vinshati’, in Sanskr’t, means ‘twenty’, nothing else.
It is clear from this Mantr, thus, that Yajurved does not deal with definitions, as R’g Ved did.
It deals with family and politics.
‘Complete properly, Inviolable female! Share for the controller of organs. Rich in offspring/subject. Free from sickness. Free from diminishing.’
‘aapyaayadhvamaghnyaa’indraay’ bhaagam prajaavateeranameevaa’ayaxmaa. ‘
Throughout Yajurved, we find these two subjects, mainly, dealt with.
‘THE YAJURVEDA—derived from the roots yaj, to sacrifice or, worship, and vid, to know,—is the Knowledge of Sacrifice or Sacrificial Texts and Formulas as distinguished from the Rigveda or Knowledge of Recited Praise, the Sâmaveda or Knowledge of Chanted Hymns, and the Atharva or Brahmaveda which is the Knowledge of Prayer, Charm, and Spells. Though ranking second in the Indian enumeration of the Vedas and containing much that is of very ancient origin, its compilation in its present form, exhibiting as it does the almost complete development of castes and mixt castes and considerable advance in arts and sciences, trades, handicrafts and occupations, is evidently of later date than that even of the Atharva.’
First of all, Ved should not be valued, each volume separately, altogether.
It can be valued thus, to evaluate each volume of Ved, separately.
But, even then, the evaluator must never forget that these volumes are, after all, the volumes of a Complete Book.
The entire Book has a meaning of its own.
The volumes are necessary to provide easy perusal of the book.
They are not separate books.
They are volumes of a Complete Book, conveying its own meaning.
Unfortunately, this original concept is missing altogether in these prefaces, or introductions to separate volumes of Ved, making them erroneous thus.
16. ‘Be constant in this master of ‘go’, numerous females!’
‘Dhruvaa’asmin gopatau syaat, Bahveeh!’
This Mantr, thus, addresses the women of Sukr’ts, noble doers.
The Sukr’t, Noble doer, is said to be ‘MASTER OF GO”GOPATI’, here.
Ved contains infinite knowledge:
‘Anantaa vai Vedaa’.
‘GOPATI’ has been translated here ‘MASTER OF GO’, because ‘GO’ does not mean ‘WOMEN’ only in Vedic Sanskr’t.
It means, ORGAN, LAND, ALIVE, MOVING, ANIMAL, BULL, COW
, etc. as well.
Vedic Sanskr’t is actually a TELEGRAPHIC LANGUAGE.
It was devised by Eishan Param Brahm Paramatma, Himself, to convey His knowledge for human beings, to guide them eternally, IF THEY WANT IT.
Eishan Param Brahm Paramatma does not impose even His divine knowledge on any one.
It’s there if you want it for you.
It’s there, but not for you, if you don’t want it.
17. ‘Bahvīh’ in original text.
You must act exactly akin to a bull in this matter.
You lose human beings if you act otherwise.
You must never fight this inherent tendency in you.
It is not harmful to the human society.
If it were, We haven’t allowed it to be inherent in you.
Never allow yourself to be a prey for the evil ones.
They always talk of justice, but never actually mean it.
If possible, they would always be the first to do injustice to others.
That’s why this movement is not based on well talkers, ‘Suvaktr’.
It is based on Sukr’ts, well doers.
We are not proposing talks here.
We are proposing actions:
‘Kurvannévéh karmāñi jijīvishéchchhagvong samāh,
Évam tvayi nānyathéto’sti n’ karm lipyaté naré.’
‘Doing Karm only, here, one should wish
Only this is the way for thee, none else;
Never believe on what they say.
Always watch what they do:
‘Mukham padmdalākāram vāchā chandanshītalā,
Hr’dayam krodhsanyuktam, trividham dhūrtlaxañam.’
‘Face as handsome as a flock of lotuses, speech as cooling as sandalwood, heart is full of fury, the three are symptoms of a perfidious.’
In a system of life that never compromises with the matrimonial right to the evil doers, polygamycannot be negated absolutely.
Yes, the evil doers can raise hell on it.
But, all their protest must be faced bravely to establish a human society marching ahead aggressively to infinite divinity.
Fight with the evil doers for the cause:
‘Udyachchhadhvamap raxo hanāthémām nārīm sukr’té dadhāt.
Dhātā vipashchit patimasyai vivéd bhago rājā pur étu prajānan.’
‘Stand up/Raise ye. Smite away the demons. Set this woman for well doer. Inspired holder/guardian must know especially the husband for her. The well knowing politician come first/ahead for her genital organ.’
An ideal love maker, ‘Vansagah’, is not the one who makes love to please his beloved for the time being only.
How it can please forever his beloved if the future of her children is not safe in a corrupt and wicked society?
Only some Islamic countries are practicing it now.
‘Allow it’, Not order it.
Yet, it’s legal there.
The countries that practice monogamy always ridicule it, always criticize it and claim it’s against humanity.
They claim it’s a grand oppression on womankind.
Their claim is of course true if all the husbands are really Sukr’ts.
Is it true?
The oppression on womankind is still there if a husband is not a Sukr’t.
Monogamy has not stopped it.
Monogamy is not successful in stopping the oppression on womankind.
It’s only a lollipop the present civilized society has presented to the womankind.
If a man is not Sukr’t he must never be allowed to have any matrimonial rights at all.
The societies that were formed only to get rid of constant reforms Hinduism was adamant to bring in the mankind were upset how to face this practical problem.
The concerned societies were not worried of the oppression on their womankind.
They were never.
And to speak a never unspoken bold truth, they are not still now.
They have never considered it even as a possible option to end the oppression on their womankind to be Sukr’t themselves.
If they had there was nothing else to stop them from joining Hinduism.
Instead of doing this, they proposed monogamy and divorce to score on Hindus, to their own womankind.
Hence the monogamy and divorce were devised by non Hindu societies.
It was not for the benefit of their womankind to get rid of the oppression of their mankind.
No, it was not.
It was only claimed to be so.
It practices polygamy and requires from womankind never to resort to any divorce at all:
‘Ihaiv stam mā vi yaushŧam vishvamāyurvyashnutam,
Krīdantau putrairnaptr’bhirmodmānau své gr’hé.’
‘Remain ye both only here. Don’t be separated. Enjoy whole life sporting with sons grandsons, rejoicing in your own home.’
‘‘Ihaiv stam mā vi yaushŧam vishvamāyurvyashnutam,
Krīdantau putrairnaptr’bhirmodmānau svastakau.’
‘Remain ye both only here. Don’t be separated. Enjoy whole life sporting with sons grandsons, rejoicing in the beautiful home.’
Their womankind fell for it because they were never told the true facts.
They were taught not to be educated.
Why education for women at all?
Why should they learn anything except to please their own mankind?
It explains why the non Hindu societies were so adamant not to educate their own womankind.
Their education liberated their women and sent them to Hindus.
It contains basic definitions of everything, exhaustively, a human being needs for the journey from humanity to infinite divinity.
If a human being, whether male or female, wants to live a successful life, s/he has to go nowhere else.
Ved can guide everyone to the success s/he dreams to attain, if understood and followed properly.
The infallible East India Company lost its political power to the British Government.
It was impossible for the British not to analyze their historical defeat.
They found three persons behind 1857,
All the three were brought out under only one court, the court of Bājī Rao II.
Bājī Rao II never compromised with the British.
They forced Bājī Rao II to take pension and go to Biŧhoor.
Yet, the great patriot patronized 1857, through his great children and interns, even after six years of his death.
He planned 1857 successfully right under the very nose of the British.
Guarding the cattle of the worshiper, of course.
And what are the cattle of the worshiper, ‘Yajmānasý Pashūn’?
‘Vitishŧhantām māturasyā upasthānnānārūpā pashavo jāýmānāh.
Sumangalyup sīdémamagnim, sampatnī, pratibhūshéh dévān.’
‘Let there come forth from the genital organ of this mother, animals of various forms, being born.
8. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 5
9. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 6
10. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 7
11. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 8
12.R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 9
32. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 11| Mantr 1
34. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 23| Mantr 3
35. Saamved: Mantr 1
More on Ved from DSM Satyarthi:
4. Casteism is NOT an intgral part of Hinduism:’Samaanee prapaa sah vonnabhaagah’ ”Same drinking same share of food.’