Ved: Yajurved: Adhyāý 1: Mantr 1

Ved: 2 Yajurved:

Poorv Vinshati:

Adhyāý 1: Mantr 1

DSM Satyarthi

 ————————————————————————————

O    Om ishé tvorjjé tvā vāyavasth’ devo vah savitā prārpayatu shréshŧhtamāý karmañ āpyāyadhvamaghnyā’indrāy’ bhāgam prajāvatīranamīvā’ayaxmā mā v’ sten eishat māghshagvagvonso dhruvā’asmin gopatau syāt bahvīryajmaanasý pashūnpāhi.

——————————————————————————————————

1. 1Om! For food2/the will power3,thee4 . For energy,thee5 . Breezes are ye6. Divine Creator impel, you all7, to noblest work8. Complete properly9, Inviolable female10! share for the controller of organs11. Rich in offspring/subject12.Free from sickness13. Free from diminishing14No thief rule on you, no evil-praiser15. Be constant in this master of ‘go’16, numerous females17! Guard the cattle of the worshiper18.

———————————————————————–

 1. R’shi: Paraméshŧhī Prajāpati.

The Param Purush/the absolute man is Paraméshŧhī. He has been nominated by Eishān Param Brahm Paramātmā Himself, to play the same role in the democratic system of all His infinite creations, as the President plays in a Parliamentary Democratic System.

But there are some differences too:

A. He is nominated, not chosen, as it is required in a Parliamentary Democratic System.

B. His authority can be challenged in the Supreme Court of Eishān Param Brahm Paramātmā only, nowhere else.

C. The persons who are atheists have nothing to complain, as they don’t believe in the Existence of Eishān Param Brahm Paramātmā Himself. They have not to believe in the existence of Param Purush too, similarly.

Param Purush is also capable to execute his authority himself, almost like Eishān Param Brahm Paramātmā.

Eishān Param Brahm Paramātmā is Almighty.

Param Purush is also almost almighty, having only one supreme authority above him, Eishān Param Brahm Paramātmā.

D. One can differ with Param Purush, but one can’t challenge his authority anywhere else except in the court of Eishān Param Brahm Paramātmā.

E. Param Purush is immortal, while the other Presidents are not.

F. A difference of opinion with Param Purush is not necessarily a disobedience to Eishān Param Brahm Paramātmā, until it is against Ved itself.

Dévtā/Divine Subject: Savitā, the Creator.

Chhand/Meter: Till ‘Bhāgam’: Svarāŧ Br’hatī. Svar: Madhyam.

After ‘Bhāgam’: Chhand/Meter: Brāhmī Ushñik. Svar: R’shabh.

Yajurved is the second volume of Ved.

Yajurved is divided into forty chapters. Each chapter is called ‘Adhyāý’.

These forty chapters are grouped in two groups of twenty chapters each.

The first group is called ‘Poorv Vinshati’, and the second one is called ‘Uttar Vinshati’.

‘Vinshati’, in Sanskr’t, means ‘twenty’, nothing else.

It is clear from this Mantr, thus, that Yajurved does not deal with definitions, as R’g Ved did.
It deals with family and politics.
Family:
‘Complete properly, Inviolable female! Share for the controller of organs. Rich in offspring/subject. Free from sickness. Free from diminishing.’
aapyaayadhvamaghnyaa’indraay’ bhaagam prajaavateeranameevaa’ayaxmaa. ‘

Politics:
‘No thief rule on you, no evil-praiser.’
”maa v’ sten eishat maaghshagvaongso.’

Throughout Yajurved, we find these two subjects, mainly, dealt with.

Ralph T. H. Griffith M.A., C.I.E. has introduced Yajurved thus:

THE YAJURVEDA—derived from the roots yaj, to sacrifice or, worship, and vid, to know,—is the Knowledge of Sacrifice or Sacrificial Texts and Formulas as distinguished from the Rigveda or Knowledge of Recited Praise, the Sâmaveda or Knowledge of Chanted Hymns, and the Atharva or Brahmaveda which is the Knowledge of Prayer, Charm, and Spells. Though ranking second in the Indian enumeration of the Vedas and containing much that is of very ancient origin, its compilation in its present form, exhibiting as it does the almost complete development of castes and mixt castes and considerable advance in arts and sciences, trades, handicrafts and occupations, is evidently of later date than that even of the Atharva.’

I’m sorry to disagree, profoundly, with the learned scholar of Ved, Ralph T. H. Griffith M.A., C.I.E., here.

First of all, Ved should not be valued, each volume separately, altogether.

It can be valued thus, to evaluate each volume of Ved, separately.

But, even then, the evaluator must never forget that these volumes are, after all, the volumes of a Complete Book.

The entire Book has a meaning of its own.

The volumes are necessary to provide easy perusal of the book.

They are not separate books.

They are volumes of a Complete Book, conveying its own meaning.

Unfortunately, this original concept is missing altogether in these prefaces, or introductions to separate volumes of Ved, making them erroneous thus.

16. ‘Be constant in this master of ‘go’, numerous females!’
Dhruvaa’asmin gopatau syaat, Bahveeh!’
This Mantr, thus, addresses the women of Sukr’ts, noble doers.
The Sukr’t, Noble doer, is said to be ‘MASTER OF GO”GOPATI’, here.
Ved contains infinite knowledge:
‘Anantaa vai Vedaa’.
‘GOPATI’ has been translated here ‘MASTER OF GO’, because ‘GO’ does not mean ‘WOMEN’ only in Vedic Sanskr’t.

It means, ORGAN, LAND, ALIVE, MOVING, ANIMAL, BULL, COW

, etc. as well.
Vedic Sanskr’t is actually a TELEGRAPHIC LANGUAGE.
It was devised by Eishan Param Brahm Paramatma, Himself, to convey His knowledge for human beings, to guide them eternally, IF THEY WANT IT.
Eishan Param Brahm Paramatma does not impose even His divine knowledge on any one.
It’s there if you want it for you.
It’s there, but not for you, if you don’t want it.

17.  ‘Bahvīh’ in original text.

You must act exactly akin to a bull in this matter.

You lose human beings if you act otherwise.

You must never fight this inherent tendency in you.

It is not harmful to the human society.

If it were, We haven’t allowed it to be inherent in you.

Never allow yourself to be a prey for the evil ones.

They always talk of justice, but never actually mean it.

If possible, they would always be the first to do injustice to others.

That’s why this movement is not based on well talkers, ‘Suvaktr’.

It is based on Sukr’ts, well doers.

We are not proposing talks here.

We are proposing actions:

Kurvannévéh karmāñi jijīvishéchchhagvong samāh,

Évam tvayi nānyathéto’sti n’ karm lipyaté naré.’

VedYajurved40|2

‘Doing Karm only, here, one should wish

to live hundreds of years.

Only this is the way for thee, none else;

So Karm cleaveth not to man.’

Never believe on what they say.

Always watch what they do:

Mukham padmdalākāram vāchā chandanshītalā,

Hr’dayam krodhsanyuktam, trividham dhūrtlaxañam.’

‘Face as handsome as a flock of lotuses, speech as cooling as sandalwood, heart is full of fury, the three are symptoms of a perfidious.’

Sukr’t must never decline polygamy, if he is capable.

In a system of life that never compromises with the matrimonial right to the evil doers, polygamycannot be negated absolutely.

It cannot be denied that there may be a time too, when Sukr’ts are not so many in numbers, enough to practice monogamy with the entire womankind.

What is another practical option then except polygamy for Sukr’ts?

Yes, the evil doers can raise hell on it.

They can protest that only monogamy is a human practicepolygamy is an animalistic.

But, all their protest must be faced bravely to establish a human society marching ahead aggressively to infinite divinity.

Fight with the evil doers for the cause:

Udyachchhadhvamap raxo hanāthémām nārīm sukr’té dadhāt.

Dhātā vipashchit patimasyai vivéd bhago rājā pur étu prajānan.’

Stand up/Raise ye. Smite away the demons. Set this woman for well doer. Inspired holder/guardian must know especially the husband for her. The well knowing politician come first/ahead for her genital organ.’

Ved: 4 Atharv Ved: 14| 1| 59

An ideal love maker, ‘Vansagah’, is not the one who makes love to please his beloved for the time being only.

An ideal love maker, ‘Vansagah’, is the one who makes love to please his beloved forever.

How it can please forever his beloved if the future of her children is not safe in a corrupt and wicked society?

It is an established fact now that Polygamy is now almost out of our civilized systems of life.

Only some Islamic countries are practicing it now.

They claim Al Qur’an Al Kareem and Islam allow it.

‘Allow it’, Not order it.

Yet, it’s legal there.

The countries that practice monogamy always ridicule it, always criticize it and claim it’s against humanity.

Why?

They claim it’s a grand oppression on womankind.

Their claim is of course true if all the husbands are really Sukr’ts.

Is it true?

The oppression on womankind is still there if a husband is not a Sukr’t.

Monogamy has not stopped it.

Monogamy is not successful in stopping the oppression on womankind.

It’s only a lollipop the present civilized society has presented to the womankind.

Hinduism was stressing its optimum on humankind that it’s the only way to end the oppression on womankind to necessitate a Sukr’t and Sukr’t husband only.

If a man is not Sukr’t he must never be allowed to have any matrimonial rights at all.

The womankind was agreeing with Hinduism and avoiding a dushkr’t almost always as a husband.

The societies that were formed only to get rid of constant reforms Hinduism was adamant to bring in the mankind were upset how to face this practical problem.

Their own womankind was not only opting for a Hindu husband, they were resorting to have at least a clandestine Hindu lover, if it was not possible for them to have a Hindu husband.

The concerned societies were not worried of the oppression on their womankind.

They were never.

And to speak a never unspoken bold truth, they are not still now.

They have never considered it even as a possible option to end the oppression on their womankind to be Sukr’t themselves.

If they had there was nothing else to stop them from joining Hinduism.

Instead of doing this, they proposed monogamy and divorce to score on Hindus, to their own womankind.

Hence the monogamy and divorce were devised by non Hindu societies.

It was not for the benefit of their womankind to get rid of the oppression of their mankind.

No, it was not.

It was only claimed to be so.

Actually it was a lollipop to their own womankind to keep them away from a Hindu husband/Hindu lover.

Gradually such non Hindu societies even started to claim, entirely shamelessly, that Hinduismoppresses womankind.

It practices polygamy and requires from womankind never to resort to any divorce at all:

Ihaiv stam mā vi yaushŧam vishvamāyurvyashnutam,

Krīdantau putrairnaptr’bhirmodmānau své gr’hé.’

‘Remain ye both only here. Don’t be separated. Enjoy whole life sporting with sons grandsons, rejoicing in your own home.’

VedR’gved10|85|42

‘‘Ihaiv stam mā vi yaushŧam vishvamāyurvyashnutam,

Krīdantau putrairnaptr’bhirmodmānau svastakau.’

‘Remain ye both only here. Don’t be separated. Enjoy whole life sporting with sons grandsons, rejoicing in the beautiful home.’

VedAtharv Ved14|1|22

Their womankind fell for it because they were never told the true facts.

They were taught not to be educated.

Why education for women at all?

Why should they learn anything except to please their own mankind?

It explains why the non Hindu societies were so adamant not to educate their own womankind.

Their education liberated their women and sent them to Hindus.

When they could not stop them even then, they resorted to their Honor Killings even instead of controlling and improving themselves to be Sukr’ts.

18Yajurved is the second volume of Ved.

As everyone knows, Ved is divided into four volumes.

The first volume, R’gved is almost the half of the entire Ved.

It contains basic definitions of everything, exhaustively, a human being needs for the journey from humanity to infinite divinity.

If a human being, whether male or female, wants to live a successful life, s/he has to go nowhere else.

Ved can guide everyone to the success s/he dreams to attain, if understood and followed properly.

The British were so afraid of Ved that they mistranslated and misinterpreted it, exhaustively, to break and divide the historical unity Hindus and Musalmeen were enjoying and to uproot them thus.

It forced the British to face 1857.

The infallible East India Company lost its political power to the British Government.

It was impossible for the British not to analyze their historical defeat.

They found three persons behind 1857,

Nānā Sāħab PeshwaTātyā Ŧopé and Maharani Laxmi Bai, the world famous Queen of Jhansi.

All the three were brought out under only one court, the court of Bājī Rao II.

Bājī Rao II never compromised with the British.

They forced Bājī Rao II to take pension and go to Biŧhoor.

Yet, the great patriot patronized 1857, through his great children and interns, even after six years of his death.

He planned 1857 successfully right under the very nose of the British.

How it was done?

Guarding the cattle of the worshiper, of course.

And what are the cattle of the worshiper, ‘Yajmānasý Pashūn’?

Eishān Param Brahm Paramātmā/Ved clarify it Him/itself:

Vitishŧhantām māturasyā upasthānnānārūpā pashavo jāýmānāh.

Sumangalyup sīdémamagnim, sampatnī, pratibhūshéh dévān.’

‘Let there come forth from the genital organ of this mother, animals of various forms, being born.

Well doing woman, sit by the man leading to light. Proper wife, ornamentize here the divine ones.’

Ved4 Atharvved: 14|2|25

Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 1| Mantr 2

——————————————————————–———————–————–

More commentary on Ved from DSM Satyarthi:

1. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

2. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 1| Mantr 2

3. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 5| Mantr 3

4. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 5| Mantr 3

5. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 7| Mantr 5

6. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 7| Mantr 8

4. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 1

5. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 2

6. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 3

7. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 4

8. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 5

9. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 6

10. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 7

11. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 8

12.R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 9

13. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 58| Mantr 6

14. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 164| Mantr 20

15. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 164| Mantr 46

16. R’gved: Mandal 2| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

17 R’gved: Mandal 3| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

18. R’gved: Mandal 3| Sookt 6| Mantr 2

19. R’gved: Mandal 4| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

20. R’gved: Mandal 5| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

21. R’gved: Mandal 6| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

22. R’gved: Mandal 7| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

23. R’gved: Mandal 8| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

24. R’gved: Mandal 9| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

25. R’gved: Mandal 9| Sookt 63| Mantr 4-5

26. R’gved: Mandal 10| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

27. R’gved: Mandal 10| Sookt 85| Mantr 42

28. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 1| Mantr 1

29. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 1| Mantr 2

30. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 1| Mantr 3

31. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 1| Mantr 4

32. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 11| Mantr 1

33. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 13| Mantr 4

34. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 23| Mantr 3

35. Saamved: Mantr 1

36. Sāmved: Mantr 641: Mahānāmnyārchik| 1

37. Sāmved: Mantr 650: Mahānāmnyārchik| 10

38. Sāmved: Mantr 651: Uttarārchik

39. Atharv Ved: Kaand 1| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

40.  Atharv Ved: Kānd 3| Sookt 30| Mantr 3

41. Atharv Ved: Kānd 3| Sookt 30| Mantr 4

42. Atharv Ved: Kānd 3| Sookt 30| Mantr 6

43. Atharv Ved: Kaand 8| Sookt 1| Mantr 6

44. Atharv Ved: Kaand 14| Sookt 1| Mantr 22

45.Atharv Ved: Kaand 14| Sookt 2| Mantr 25

———————————————————————————–———–

More on Ved from DSM Satyarthi:

1. ‘According to facts’: ‘Yaathaatathyatah’

2. According to Hinduism: We must be polite, not coward

3. Aheism can’t win Hinduism/Ved

4. Casteism is NOT an intgral part of Hinduism:’Samaanee prapaa sah vonnabhaagah’ ”Same drinking same share of food.’

5. Hinduism builds its society on SUKR’TS/Noble doers:’Imaam naareem Sukr’te dadhaat’

6. Hinduism is PRINCIPLES BASED , not PERSON BASED

7. One should not wish to die: Ved hates death

8. RELIGIOUS DEMOCRACY in Hinduism: Ekam sadvipra bahudhaa vadanti

9. Sanyas is not the goal of Hinduism

10. Sati tradition was an Aasur Tradition, not Vedic at all

——————————————————————————————-

1. Commentary on Ved
2. More On Hinduism
3. On Islam
4. On History
5. Science Fiction
6. Creative Adult Sex in English from Durgesh
7. Durgesh in Hindi/Urdu

30 comments on “Ved: Yajurved: Adhyāý 1: Mantr 1

  1. […] profound humanity we find in Ved. These other books lack the depth Ved has. How can it be if the Ved and the other books are from the same source? A writer revises, improves himself in his later work […]

  2. […] Hinduism builds its society on SUKR’TS: ‘Udyachchhadhvamap raxo hanaathemaam naareem SUKR’TE dadhaat. Dhaataa vipashchit patimasyai vived, bhago raajaa pur etu prajaanan.’ ‘Stand up/Raise ye. Smite away the demons. SET THIS WOMAN for WELL DOER. Inspired holder/guardian must know especially the husband for her. The well knowing politician come first/ahead for her genital organ.’ -Ved: 4 Atharv Ved: 14/1/59 Hinduism is, thus, a society of SUKR’TS WELL DOERS only. An evil doer does not have any matrimonial rights, in Hinduism, thus; while the woman marrying him, is not bound to be a well doer. She may be a well doer, she may be NOT. Any woman can marry a Sukr’t, even if she does not agree with his system of life. That’s why PITR’YAGY’, Not MAATR’YAGY’. That’s why ‘ANUVRATAH PITUH PUTRO’, not ‘Anuvratah MAATUH putro’ That’s why PATRIARCHAL SYSTEM OF HINDUISM, not Matriarchal. It’s not gender biased actually. It’s GOOD DEED biased, to build an eternal humane society MARCHING AGGRESSIVELY TO INFINITE DIVINITY always. ‘Ut devaa avhitam devaa unnyathaa punah, Utaagashchakrusham devaa devaa jeevyathaa punah.’ ‘Divine ones! Divine ones! raise up the downtrodden. And, Divine ones! Divine ones! Make him to live again, who hath done evil.’ -Ved: 4 Atharv Ved: 4/13/1 ‘Om ishe tvorjje tvaa vaayav sth’ devo vah savitaa praarpayatu shreshthtamaay’ karman’aapyaayadhvamaghnyaa’in draay’ bhaagam prajaavateeranameevaa’ayaxmaa maa v’ sten eishat maaghshagvagvonso dhruvaa’asmin gopatau syaat bahveeryajmaanasy’ pashoonpaahi.’ ‘Om! for food/the energy of desire, thee. For energy, thee. Breezes are ye. Divine Creator impel, you all, to noblest work. Complete properly, Inviolable female! share for the controller of organs.Rich in offspring/subject. Free from sickness. Free from diminishing. No thief rule on you, no evil-praiser. Be constant in this master of ‘go’, numerous! Guard the cattle of the worshiper.’ -Ved: 2 Yajurved: 1/1 […]

  3. […] Hinduism is, thus, a society of SUKR’TS WELL DOERS only. An evil doer does not have any matrimonial rights, in Hinduism, thus; while the woman marrying him, is not bound to be a well doer. She may be a well doer, she may be NOT. That’s why PITR’YAGY’, Not MAATR’YAGY’. That’s why ‘ANUVRATAH PITUH PUTRO’, not ‘Anuvratah MAATUH putro’ That’s why PATRIARCHAL SYSTEM OF HINDUISM. It’s not gender biased actually. It’s GOOD DEED biased, to build an eternal humane society MARCHING AGGRESSIVELY TO DIVINITY always. ‘Ut devaa avhitam devaa unnyathaa punah, Utaagashchakrusham devaa devaa jeevyathaa punah.’ ‘Divine ones! Divine ones! raise up the downtrodden. And, Divine ones! Divine ones! Make him to live again, who hath done evil.’ -Ved: 4 Atharv Ved: 4/13/1 ‘Om ishe tvorjje tvaa vaayav sth’ devo vah savitaa praarpayatu shreshthtamaay’ karman’aapyaayadhvamaghnyaa’in draay’ bhaagam prajaavateeranameevaa’ayaxmaa maa v’ sten eishat maaghshagvagvonso dhruvaa’asmin gopatau syaat bahveeryajmaanasy’ pashoonpaahi.’ ‘Om! for food/the energy of desire, thee. For energy, thee. Breezes are ye. Divine Creator impel, you all, to noblest work. Complete properly, Inviolable female! share for the controller of organs.Rich in offspring/subject. Free from sickness. Free from diminishing. No thief rule on you, no evil-praiser. Be constant in this master of ‘go’, numerous! Guard the cattle of the worshiper.’ -Ved: 2 Yajurved: 1/1 […]

  4. […] does not tally with the structure Ved proposes for the human Societies, Daneel! Eīshān Param Brahm Parmātmā has designed the […]

  5. […] friends and family laugh at me when I offer Stavans to your Eīshān Param Brahm […]

  6. […] extremely beautiful Muslimahs female friends, from almost every Islamic country were now fucking Durgesh, without any […]

  7. […] Hinduism builds its society on SUKR’TS, not on horses as the hate mongers claim. Hinduism, thus, builds a society of SUKR’TS’ ‘WELL DOERS’ only. An evil doer does not have any matrimonial rights, in Hinduism, thus; while the woman marrying him, is not bound to be a well doer. She may be a well doer, she may be NOT. Any woman can marry a Sukr’t, even if she does not agree with his system of life. That’s why PITR’YAGY’, Not MAATR’YAGY’. That’s why ‘ANUVRATAH PITUH PUTRO’, not ‘Anuvratah MAATUH putro’ That’s why PATRIARCHAL SYSTEM OF HINDUISM, not Matriarchal. It’s not gender biased actually. It’s GOOD DEED biased, to build an eternal humane society MARCHING AGGRESSIVELY TO INFINITE DIVINITY always. ‘Ut devaa avhitam devaa unnyathaa punah, Utaagashchakrusham devaa devaa jeevyathaa punah.’ ‘Divine ones! Divine ones! raise up the downtrodden. And, Divine ones! Divine ones! Make him to live again, who hath done evil.’ -Ved: 4 Atharv Ved: 4/13/1 ‘Om ishe tvorjje tvaa vaayav sth’ devo vah savitaa praarpayatu shreshthtamaay’ karman’aapyaayadhvamaghnyaa’in draay’ bhaagam prajaavateeranameevaa’ayaxmaa maa v’ sten eishat maaghshagvagvonso dhruvaa’asmin gopatau syaat bahveeryajmaanasy’ pashoonpaahi.’ ‘Om! for food/the energy of desire, thee. For energy, thee. Breezes are ye. Divine Creator impel, you all, to noblest work. Complete properly, Inviolable female! share for the controller of organs.Rich in offspring/subject. Free from sickness. Free from diminishing. No thief rule on you, no evil-praiser. Be constant in this master of ‘go’, numerous! Guard the cattle of the worshiper.’ -Ved: 2 Yajurved: 1/1 […]

  8. […] “Durgesh―Durgesh―Durgesh. Is he your husband now― is he your Kħasam now that you talk of him twenty-four hours? Says I behave. And, how are you behaving with your own real mother―you bitch!” […]

  9. […] Safdar Al Saåeed watched as I aimed my Hindu Cock at his beautiful wife’s Saůūdī Årab Muslimā […]

  10. […] Yajurved deals with family and politics essentially. […]

  11. […] Sciences, Society, Ved, Ved Bhashy, Yajurved ‘No thief rule on you, no evil praiser’: ‘Maa v’ sten eishat, maa aghshagvogso’: Ved: DSM […]

  12. […] proposes democracy and PROGRESSIVE POLITICS: Yajurved opens: ‘Om ishe tvorjje tvaa vaayav sth’ devo vah savitaa praarpayatu shreshthtamaay’ […]

  13. panditji! kahan apka mahan gyan aur kahan ye gandi kahaniyan?me apki badi izzat karta hoon.ye apke dushmanon ka kam lagta hai.apko badnam karne ke liye.

  14. […] does not tally with the structure Ved proposes for the human Societies, Daneel! Eīshān Param Brahm Parmātmā has designed the […]

  15. […] I took her beautiful face in my palms and outlined her extra ordinary crimson Årab Muslim female lips with the tip of my masculine Hindu tongue. […]

  16. […] “Durgesh―Durgesh―Durgesh. Is he your husband now― is he your Kħasam now that you talk of him twenty-four hours? Says I behave. And, how are you behaving with your own real mother―you bitch!” Next day Al Zubédā Al Wahāb told every thing to me. […]

  17. […] Safdar Al Saåeed watched as I aimed my Hindu Cock at his beautiful wife’s Saůūdī Årab Muslimā […]

  18. […] friends and family laugh at me when I offer Stavans to your Eīshān Param Brahm […]

  19. […] extremely beautiful Muslimahs female friends, from almost every Islamic country were now fucking Durgesh, without any […]

  20. John377 says:

    Very nice site! [url=http://opxyiea.com/yoyrtxo/2.html]is it yours too[/url]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s