Socialism in Hinduism

Socialism in Hinduism

Socialism refers to any of various economic and political concepts of state or collective (i.e. public) ownership and administration of the means of production and distribution of goods and services, some of which have been developed into more or less highly articulated theories and/or praxis.[1] In a Marxist or labor-movement definition of the term, socialism is a stage of society in Marxist theory transitional between capitalism and communism and distinguished by unequal distribution of goods and pay according to work done with the goal of creating a socio-economic system in which property and the distribution of wealth are subject to control by the community.[2] This control may be exercised on behalf of the state, through a market, or through popular collectives such as workers’ councils and cooperatives. As an economic system, socialism is often characterized by state, cooperative, or worker ownership of the means of production, goals which have been attributed to, and claimed by, a number of political parties and governments.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Socialism

Hinduism does not oppose PRIVATE PROPERTY.
Yet, it preaches to its followers:

Eishaavaasyamidagvong sarvam,
yatkinch’ jagatyaam jagat,
Ten tyakten bhunjeetha,
Maa gr’dhah kasy’ sviddhanam.’

Kurvanneveh karmaan’i
jijeevishechchhatagvong samaah,
Evam tvayi naanyatheto’sti n’ karm lipyate nare.’

Panentheable by the Lord must be This All;
Each thing, whatsoever moves in the Multiverse.
With that renounced, enjoy thyself,
Covet no wealth of anyone.’

Only Doing works here
one should wish to live hundreds of years.
No way for thee but this
so action cleaveth not the man.’

Ved: 2Yajurved: 40/12.’

The policy, how to behave with the Multiverse surrounding us, is described here, in these two Mantrs.

The first point of the policy is,
Eishaavaasyamidagvong  sarvam
Panentheable by the Lord must be This All,’

What is this ‘all’?
Ved itself elaborates:
yatkinch’ jagatyaam jagat
‘Each thing, whatsoever moves in the Multiverse.’

The second point of the policy is:
Ten tyakten bhunjeetha
‘With that renounced, enjoy thyself’

This is the reason, why it was enunciated that–
Eishaavaasyamidagvong sarvam
Panentheable by the Lord must be This All,’

If ‘yatkinch’ jagatyaam jagat
‘Each thing, whatsoever moves in the Multiverse.’
is panentheable by the Lord, it means THAT IT IS NOT OURS, that it belongs to Eishan Param Brahm Parmatma.

An atheist may laugh at it,

An atheist may laugh at it, but he can’t refuse that:
yatkinch’ jagatyaam jagat
‘Each thing, whatsoever moves in the Multiverse’
was present here before he was even born, and will CONTINUE to remain here, even when he’ll die.

So, how it can be his/her?

If one insists that there isn’t any God, even then
yatkinch’ jagatyaam jagat
‘Each thing, whatsoever moves in the Multiverse
can’t be his/her.
It may be that of the nation, but NOT HIS/HER.

It is the fact that’s been reminded here effectively.
Why?
So that a person should not develop an emotion of possession for
‘yatkinch’ jagatyaam jagat
‘Each thing, whatsoever moves in the Multiverse‘.

With this true emotion that nothing is actually mine, one should enjoy the multiverse:
Ten tyakten bhunjeetha

This principle, enunciated here, thus destroys all the roots of all possible corruptions.

The PRINCIPLE, thus stated in Ved, however, was not limited actually TO THE VEDIC AGE ONLY.
The Hindus, whether they know about anything of Ved or not, they still believe in:
‘SABAI BHOOMI GOPAL KI.’
‘The entire land belongs to the God.’

What is this strong belief of present day Hindus?
It’s the same old Ved Mantr, expressed in different words only:
”Eishaavaasyamidagvong sarvam’
‘Panentheable by the Lord must be This All,’

Ved does not state this principle only lightly in one place.
It repeats the principle AGAIN AND AGAIN, emphasizing thus, that THE VED IS ABSOLUTELY SERIOUS ABOUT IT.
It says:
‘Kevalaagho bhavati kevalaadee.’
‘One is personified sin, if one eats alone.’
It orders its followers:
‘Shathast samaahar, sahasrhast samkir.’
‘Hundred handed! collect from everywhere properly. Thousnd handed! Distribute properly.’
Ved: 4 Atharv Ved: 3/24/5

The question is:
WHY HINDUISM DOES NOT OPPOSE PRIVATE PROPERTY, as Communism and Socialism do?

The question becomes more important when one knows about the philosophical, legal and political debates on it:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Private_property

Hinduism believes in family.
It orders its followers:
Ihaiv stam maa viyaushtam vishvamaayurvyashnutam,
Kreedantau putrairnaptr’bhirmodmaanau sve gr’he.’

‘Abide only here, both of you, never be separated, Enjoying your entire life:
Sporting with sons and grandsons, happy in your own home.’
Ved: 1 R’g Ved: 10/85/42

This order was so important,in the eyes of Ved, that it repeats it again, in Atharv Ved, explaining how its followers’ homes should be:

Ihaiv stam maa viyaushtam vishvamaayurvyashnutam,
Kreedantau putrairnaptr’bhirmodmaanau svastakau.’

‘Abide only here, both of you, never be separated, Enjoying your entire life:
Sporting with sons and grandsons, rejoicing well-homed.’
Ved: 4 Athrv Ved: 14/1/22

Here, Hinduism differs with both the Communism and Socialism, strongly.
Hinduism orders a stout family, for entire lifetime of a person, man or woman.
It orders JOINT FAMILY even.
Communism and Socialism, in their sheer foolishness, are trying their best to destroy it, CREATING, THUS, SO MANY SOCIAL AND MEDICAL PROBLEMS, for their blind supporters.
Including madness and suicides, too.

‘Is capitalism any better.’
No.
I’m not proposing Capitalism.
I’m proposing HINDUISM.
I’m proposing PROFOUND HUMANITY.

I’ve written:
‘Ved does not state this principle only lightly in one place.
It repeats the principle AGAIN AND AGAIN, emphasizing thus, that THE VED IS ABSOLUTELY SERIOUS ABOUT IT.
It says:
‘Kevalaagho bhavati kevalaadee.’
‘One is personified sin, if one eats alone.’
It orders its followers:
‘Shathast samaahar, sahasrhast samkir.’
‘Hundred handed! collect from everywhere properly. Thousnd handed! Distribute properly.’
-Ved: 4Atharv Ved: 3/24/5 ‘

Is it Capitalism?

Certainly NOT.

It’s Hinduism.

—————————————————————————————-

More on Hinduism from DSM Satyarthi:

1. ‘Bhoorbhuvah svah!’ ‘The Existence! The Consciousness! The Bliss!’

2.‘Devasy’ pashy’ kaavyam, n’ mamaar, n’ jeeryati.’

3. Hinduism shines

4.Ved is the eternal law book having infinite knowledge in it for human beings

5. ‘According to facts’: ‘Yaathaatathyatah’

6. ‘SET THIS WOMAN for WELL DOER’: ‘Imaam naareem Sukr’te dadhaat’

7. The Evernew Hinduism: Yaathaatathyatah: Ved 2|40|8

8. ‘How to cross death’: ‘Tamev viditvaati mr’tyumeti’: Ved2Yajurved|31|18

9. According to Hinduism: We must be polite, not coward

10.Ye yathaa maam prapadyante taanstathaiv bhajaamyaham: Lord Kr’shn

11. ‘Maachchhitthaa asmaallokaat’ ‘Be not severed from this world’: Ved

12. The mental slavery of the English-educated Indians

19. Change the Society . Don’t Surrender to it: Lesson from Life of Karn’

—————————————————————————————-

More on Islam from DSM Sayarthi:

1. Bal huv qur’anum majeedun fe LAUHIM MAHFOOZIN

2. Innahu laquranun kareemun Fee kitabin maknoonin

3. ‘Hudallilmuttaqeen’: ‘Guidance for controllers of organs’: 2 Al Baqarah: 2

4. ‘Alaa qalbik litakoon minal-munzireen’ ‘upon your heart one of who to warn’

5. Muslimahs! Come to India. I recommend Hindu lovers for all the Muslimahs.: Khadeejah Muhammad

6. Islam according to Qur’an and Maulana Maududi rahamatullh alaihi

7. A Moment of grave thinking for the entire sophisticated Muslim Community

8. ‘SET THIS WOMAN for WELL DOER’: ‘Imaam naareem Sukr’te dadhaat’

9. ‘V’ innahu fe UMMALKITAABI ladainaa la’liyyun hakeemun’: 43/4

10. Most Present day Muslms don’t do what Huzoor(SAW) did:

11. The Muslim beauties are wooing Hindu men FASTEST

12. ‘What really matters in the sight of God’: Maulana: Maududi

13. Why did Islam face a counter revolution at Karbala?

14. Why there are differences among us?

15. No differences Please!

16. Communal Muslims discuss my Muslim wife, me and my Muslim women: Durgesh

17. Yes, I chose to marry a man from the kaafir community .: Sidrah

——————————————————————————————

More from DSM Satyarthi:

1.  Commentary on Ved

2. More On Hinduism

3. On Islam

4. On History

5. Science Fiction

6.  Creative Adult Sex in English from Durgesh

7. Durgesh in Hindi/Urdu

———————————————

Commentary on Ved from DSM Satyarthi:

1. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

2. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 1| Mantr 2

3. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 58| Mantr 6

4. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 164| Mantr 20

5. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 164| Mantr 46

6. R’gved: Mandal 2| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

7. R’gved: Mandal 3| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

8. R’gved: Mandal 4| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

9. R’gved: Mandal 5| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

10. R’gved: Mandal 6| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

11. R’gved: Mandal 7| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

12. R’gved: Mandal 8| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

13. R’gved: Mandal 9| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

14. R’gved: Mandal 9| Sookt 63| Mantr 4-5

15. R’gved: Mandal 10| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

16. R’gved: Mandal 10| Sookt 85| Mantr 42

17. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 1| Mantr 1

18. Saamved: Mantr 1

19. Atharv Ved: Kaand 1| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

20. Atharv Ved: Kaand 14| Sookt 1| Mantr 22

21.Atharv Ved: Kaand 14| Sookt 2| Mantr 25

6 comments on “Socialism in Hinduism

  1. vidya says:

    Too good.

    Vidya Hegde
    ———————————-
    Tips for healthy living
    http://www.vidyaprabhu.com
    ———————————-

  2. Durgesh says:

    Thank you very much, Vidya!

    Durgesh

  3. […] actually a distorted unscientific impractical form of Hinduism, nothing else at […]

  4. […] History stands to evidence, that Communism and Socialism were related till now as an elder and younger […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s