Casteism is NOT an integral part of Hinduism:’Samaanee prapaa sah vonnabhaagah’ ”Same drinking same share of food.’: Ved

Casteism is NOT an integral part of Hinduism

Samaanee prapaa sah vonnabhaagah

Same drinking same share of food.’: Ved

DSM Satyarthi

The Indian caste system describes the social stratification and social restrictions in the Indian subcontinent, in which social classes are defined by thousands of endogamous hereditary groups, often termed as jātis or castes. Within a jāti, there exist exogamous groups known as gotras, the lineage or clan of a person, although in a handful of sub-castes like Shakadvipi, endogamy within a gotra is permitted and alternative mechanisms of restricting endogamy are used (e.g. banning endogamy within a surname).

The Indian classes are similar to the Iranian classes (“pistras“),[1] wherein the priests are Athravans, the warriors are Rathaestha, the merchants are Vastriya, and the artisans are Huiti.[2][3]

Although generally identified with Hinduism, the caste system was also observed among followers of other religions in the Indian subcontinent, including some groups of Muslims and Christians.[4] The Indian Constitution has outlawed caste-based discrimination, in keeping with the socialist, secular, democratic principles that founded the nation.[5] Caste barriers have mostly broken down in large cities,[6] though they persist in rural areas of the country. Nevertheless, the caste system, in various forms, continues to survive in modern India strengthened by a combination of social perceptions and divisive politics. [7][8]

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The key question is:

‘Is it an integral part of Hinduism?

The Ved says: NO:
Samaanee prapaa sah vonnabhaagah,
samaane yoktre sah vo yunajmi.
samyanchognim saparyataaraa naabhimivaabhitah.’
‘Your drinking be the same,
in common your share of food.
In the same harness do I join you together.
United, follow you the one who leads to light,
like spokes about a nave.’
-Ved: 4 Atharv Ved: 3|30|6

There are so many questions on untouchability in Hinduism.
As one can see, it’s not supported by Ved, and by Hinduism therefore.
It’s a detestable wrong practice.
It must be abandoned at once, if not abandoned already.
It’s punishable under law, and not supported by Ved too.
Ved is quite against it, as one can easily see.

——————————————————————————————————-

1. More On Hinduism

2. On Islam

3. On History

4. Commentary on Ved

5. Science Fiction

6.  Creative Adult Sex in English from Durgesh

7. Durgesh in Hindi/Urdu

—————————————————————–

Commentary on Ved from DSM Satyarthi:

1. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

2. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 1| Mantr 2

3. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 5| Mantr 3

4. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 5| Mantr 3

5. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 7| Mantr 5

6. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 7| Mantr 8

4. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 1

5. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 2

6. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 3

7. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 4

8. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 5

9. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 6

10. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 7

11. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 8

12.R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 9

13. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 58| Mantr 6

14. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 164| Mantr 20

15. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 164| Mantr 46

16. R’gved: Mandal 2| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

17 R’gved: Mandal 3| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

18. R’gved: Mandal 3| Sookt 6| Mantr 2

19. R’gved: Mandal 4| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

20. R’gved: Mandal 5| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

21. R’gved: Mandal 6| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

22. R’gved: Mandal 7| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

23. R’gved: Mandal 8| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

24. R’gved: Mandal 9| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

25. R’gved: Mandal 9| Sookt 63| Mantr 4-5

26. R’gved: Mandal 10| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

27. R’gved: Mandal 10| Sookt 85| Mantr 42

28. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 1| Mantr 1

29. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 1| Mantr 2

30. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 1| Mantr 3

31. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 1| Mantr 4

32. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 11| Mantr 1

33. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 13| Mantr 4

34. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 23| Mantr 3

35. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 40| Mantr8

36. Saamved: Mantr 1

37. Sāmved: Mantr 115

38. Sāmved: Mantr 641: Mahānāmnyārchik| 1

39. Sāmved: Mantr 650: Mahānāmnyārchik| 10

40. Sāmved: Mantr 651: Uttarārchik

41. Atharv Ved: Kaand 1| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

42.  Atharv Ved: Kānd 3| Sookt 30| Mantr 3

43. Atharv Ved: Kānd 3| Sookt 30| Mantr 4

44. Atharv Ved: Kānd 3| Sookt 30| Mantr 6

45. Atharv Ved: Kānd 4| Sookt 4| Mantr 6

46. Atharv Ved: Kānd 4| Sookt 4| Mantr 7

47. Atharv Ved: Kānd 4| Sookt 4| Mantr 8

48. Atharv Ved: Kaand 8| Sookt 1| Mantr 6

49. Atharv Ved: Kaand 14| Sookt 1| Mantr 22

50.Atharv Ved: Kaand 14| Sookt 2| Mantr 25

Hinduism builds its society on SUKR’TS/Noble doers:’Imaam naareem Sukr’te dadhaat’

Hinduism builds its society on SUKR’TS/Noble doers:

Imām nārīm sukr’té dadhāt

DSM Satyarthi

Hinduism builds its society on SUKR’TS:

Udyachchhadhvamap raxo hanaathemaam
naareem SUKR’TE dadhaat.
Dhaataa vipashchit patimasyai vived,
bhago raajaa pur etu prajaanan.’

‘Stand up/Raise ye. Smite away the demons. SET THIS WOMAN for WELL DOER. Inspired holder/guardian must know especially the husband for her. The well knowing politician come first/ahead for her genital organ.’

Ved: 4 Atharv Ved: 14/1/59

Hinduism/ Ved does not think that a genital organ of a woman is insignificant ever.

Instead, it especially instructs its politicians, Rājā, to pay special attention to it:

Dhātā vipashchit patimasyai vivéd’ ‘Inspired holder/guardian must know especially the husband for her.’

bhago rājā pur étu prajānan’. ‘The well knowing politician come first/ahead for her genital organ.’

It is important because it is needed and it is indispensable for the survival of humanity itself.

That’s why Hinduism has given, a treatise even much abused by the foolish persons, Kām Sūtr’ etc.

Sex is not as insignificant to Hinduism as it is to the others.

Moreover, who can sincerely deny the importance of sex in human life?

It’s actually a shameless hypocrisy to deny it.

Hinduism doesn’t believe in any hypocrisy whatsoever the non Hindu religions do.

Hinduism is bold enough to accept it and even goes ahead to declare it the third goal, TR’tīý Purushārth, of human life.

Hinduism cares for the survival of humanity itself, more than the others do.

Hinduism is, thus, a society of SUKR”TS, WELL DOERS, only.
An evil doer does not have any matrimonial rights, in Hinduism, thus; while the woman marrying him, is NOT bound to be a well doer.
She may be a well doer, she may be NOT.
Any woman can marry a Sukr’t, even if she does not agree with his system of life.
That’s why PITR’YAGY’ in Hinduism, Not MAATR’YAGY’.
That’s why ‘ANUVRATAH PITUH PUTRO‘, not ‘Anuvratah MAATUH putro
That’s why PATRIARCHAL SYSTEM OF HINDUISM, not Matriarchal.
It’s not gender biased actually.
It’s GOOD DEED biased, to build an eternal humane society MARCHING AGGRESSIVELY TO INFINITE DIVINITY always.
Ut devaa avhitam devaa unnyathaa punah,
Utaagashchakrusham devaa devaa jeevyathaa punah.
Divine ones! Divine ones!

raise up the downtrodden.

And, Divine ones! Divine ones!

Make him to live again, who hath done evil.’

-Ved: 4 Atharv Ved: 4/13/1

Om ishe tvorjje tvaa vaayav sth’ devo vah savitaa praarpayatu shreshthtamaay’ karman’aapyaayadhvamaghnyaa’in draay’ bhaagam prajaavateeranameevaa’ayaxmaa maa v’ sten eishat maaghshagvagvonso dhruvaa’asmin gopatau syaat bahveeryajmaanasy’ pashoonpaahi.’

Om! for food/the will power, thee. For energy, thee. Breezes are ye. Divine Creator impel, you all, to noblest work. Complete properly, Inviolable female! share for the controller of organs. Rich in offspring/subject. Free from sickness. Free from diminishing. No thief rule on you, no evil-praiser. Be constant in this master of ‘go’, numerous females! Guard the cattle of the worshiper.’
Ved: 2 Yajurved: 1/1

Lord Kr’shn’ announces:
‘Yada yada hi dharmasy’ glaanirbhavati, Bhaarat!
abhyutthaanamadharmasy’, tadaatmaanam sr’jaamyaham.
paritraan’aay’ saadhoonaam,
VINAASHAAY’ CH’ DUSHKR’TAAM,
DHARMSANSTHAAPNAARTHAAY’ sambhavaami yuge yuge.’

‘Whenever persons feel humiliation for noble deeds, Bhaarat! and pride on evil deeds; then I create myself. To protect the nobles and to destroy the wickeds, to establish humanity leading to divinity, I do appear in every era.’
Shrimad Bhagvad Geeta: 4/7-8

VINAASHAAY’ CH’ DUSHKR’TAAM’
TO DESTROY THE WICKEDS
DHARMSANSTHAAPNAARTHAAY’
‘to establish humanity leading to divinity

What is Dharmsansthaapan?
What is establishment of humanity leading to divinity?
Destruction of wickeds: VINAASHAAY’ CH’ DUSHKR’TAAM
Then who will remain?
Obvously,
SUKR’TS:THE NOBLES.

IMAAM NAAREEM SUKR’TE DADHAAT

‘SET THIS WOMAN FOR WELL DOER.’

To whom particular well doer?

The woman HERSELF will decide it, none else:

Brahmcharyen’ kanyaa yuvaanam vindate patim,
anadvaan brahmcharyen’aashvo ghaasam jigeershati.’

‘By following orders of Brahm, girl obtains a young husband. By following orders of Brahm, a draft ox, a horse, strives to gain food.’

Ved: 4 Atharv Ved: 11/7/18

Only the foolish and childish persons, like Hassan 007, can claim, thus, that women are not given any right in Hinduism.

If not women, who are?

The ridiculous thing is, that they claim, a religion, that says women have half authenticity than men for evidences in courts, a religion that does not acknowledge that a woman is raped till there are not  eye witnesses, has given more rights to womankind than Hinduism.

Even blind communalism must have some limits of its idiosyncrasies.

Islam materially differs with Hinduism in this matter.

Hinduism/Ved says:

Even  wicked women too must not be married to a wicked. Otherwise, the wickedness will be transferred to the next generation.

This principle was practically followed by the Hindus to the extent that a detailed scientific study was commenced by the Hindu sages in the matter.

Here again, it is to be noticed that the male is represented here by the word Shiv that again means ‘Sukr’t‘.

A dushkr’t cannot be called Shiv, restricting Tantrs, thus, to Sukr’ts only.

The result was world famous Kaam Sootr by Brahmarshi Lord Vaatsyaayan.

Anangrang, Rati Rahasy’, Naagar Sarvasvam, Rati Manjaree, and even Tantrs, an Upved of Atharv Ved; were brought into existence.

Lord Vishn’u went to the extent  to make love to his sisters in law/Salhajs Vr’nda and Tulsi, even deceiving them.

Because, his brothers in law/Saale, Jaalandhar and Shankhchood’, were evil doers.

There is a complete Chapter ‘Paardaarik Prakaran’-‘ , Part 5, ‘About the wives of others’;  in Kaam Sootr.

The Bachhalyas/Vatss followed this principle to the extent that they were termed to be Dev Gandharvs even.

Y’ gaam dhaaryati s’ gandharvah‘.

A man who holds Ved/earth/organs/WOMEN is called ‘GANDHARV‘.

It’s interesting here to note that organs are being held here to have women, not to leave/renounce them, as it is erroneously  supposed today.

Women are, thus, according to Vedthe responsibility of Sukr’ts, they can’t run away from.

Moreover, it is not limited to the principles only.

It was brought to the practice too, deliberately.

We find this principle, practically working in the life of Lord Kr’shn‘.

He is simultaneously considered Yogeshvar and a great lover of women too.

Hinduism, thus, believes in Exogamy for Sukr’ts, never in Endogamy.

It preaches its followers to be the ever-best marriage according to Ved.

Islam/Qur’an makes an adjustment here with the wickeds.

It says:

وَلَا تَنكِحُوا الْمُشْرِكَاتِ حَتَّىٰ يُؤْمِنَّ ۚ وَلَأَمَةٌ مُّؤْمِنَةٌ خَيْرٌ مِّن مُّشْرِكَةٍ وَلَوْ أَعْجَبَتْكُمْ ۗ

Wala tankihoo almushrikaati hatta yuminn. walaamatun muminatun khayrun min mushrikatin walaw aAAjabatkum

Wed not Al Mushrikaat, till they believe; for lo! a believing bondwoman is better than  Mushrikaat, though she please you.’

Al Qur’an Al Kareem: 2 Al Baqarah: 221

It further says:

لَا إِكْرَاهَ فِي الدِّينِ ۖ قَد تَّبَيَّنَ الرُّشْدُ مِنَ الْغَيِّ ۚ فَمَن يَكْفُرْ بِالطَّاغُوتِ وَيُؤْمِن بِاللَّهِ فَقَدِ اسْتَمْسَكَ بِالْعُرْوَةِ الْوُثْقَىٰ لَا

انفِصَامَ لَهَا ۗ وَاللَّهُ سَمِيعٌ عَلِيمٌ

La ikraha fiddeeni qad tabayyana alrrushdu min’ alghayyi faman yakfur bialttaghooti wayumin biAllahi faqadi istamsaka bialAAurwati alwuthqa la infisama laha waAllahu sameeAAun AAaleemun.

There is no compulsion in religion. The right direction is henceforth distinct from error. And he who rejecteth false deities and believeth in Allah hath grasped a firm handhold which will never break. Allah is Hearer, Knower.’

Al Qur’an Al Kareem: 2 Al Baqarah: 256

The persons who study Ved and Qur’an comparatively, often wonder why Ved and Qur’an are so exactly opposite in the policy, while in almost all the rest of the other policies, they adopt exactly similar attitudes.

Ved orders:

Marry wicked women even, without any condition whatsoever.’

Qur’an orders:

Wala tankihoo almushrikaati hatta yuminn. walaamatun muminatun khayrun min mushrikatin walaw aAAjabatkum

Wed not Al Mushrikaat, till they believe; for lo! a believing bondwoman is better than  Mushrikaat, though she please you.’

Al Qur’an Al Kareem: 2 Al Baqarah: 221

Hinduism/Ved says:

Marry them. If you can’t convert them to nobility, and to humanity even, never allow their evil to pass on to their offspring at least.

That’s why it is called ‘Gr’hasth ASHRAM‘.

A sacred hut of severity where the Sukr’t/noble doer exerts his every possible effort to make his women and offspring human beings, nobles and divine; gradually and eventually ultimately.

An Ashram in Hinduism is a hut where the saints live in doing welfare to the entire humanity, irrespective of the castes and creeds of the persons.

It is the endless movement of Hinduism:

Vi tishthantaam maaturayaa upasthaannaanaaroopaa

pashavo jaay’maanaah,

sumangalyup seedemamagnim sampatnee pratibhoosheh devaan

‘Let there come forth, from the genital organ of this mother, animals of various forms, being born; Benevolent female! sit near/worship this Agni/the man who leads to light. Proper wife, ornamentize divine ones here properly.’

Ved: 4 Atharv Ved| 14|2|25

The future and present both, of the entire womankind, and the entire humankind eventually, are thus protected by Hinduism/ Ved skillfully.

Elsewhere, this movement is termed Kr’n’vanto vishvamaaryam by Ved/ Eishan Param Brhm Parmatma Himself:

Été asr’gramāshavo’ti hvarānsi babhravah,

Somā r’tasý dhārayā.

Indram vardhanto apturah Kr’ñvanto vishvamāryam,

            Apaghnanto arāvñah.’

‘These Swift flowing tawny colored Som, with a stream of eternal truth, let loose/proceed, augmenting Indr, urging the utmost beautiful young girls and ladies,making all better, destroying the withholders.’

Ved: 1 R’gved: 9|63|4-5

It is called the Marriage Policy of the Hindus.

The Bachhalyas/Vats people professed it to its optimum.

The Dvijs also professed it and made Hinduism benevolent to the entire womankind and to the entire humankind thus in its due course, peacefully, without any violence whatsoever, at all.

It is to be noted that out of the holy wars, Dharm Yuddhs, Hinduism has fought for its own survival, most of them were for the protection of fundamental human rights of womankind.

Even the universally famous war of Mahā Bhārat was fought because the wicked ones degraded a woman.

One more universally famous war of Lord Rām and Rāvañ had the same reason previously.

If we peruse the Hindu history in detail, we find to our incredible surprise that Hindus almost never fought for any vile purposes or for their own selfishness.

Even then whenever any non Hindu girl/woman married a Hindu male, the non Hindu society always took it as an insult, a humiliation, to it.

No non Hindu society ever took it as a matter of her fundamental human rights.

The society’s own self conceived and self decided pride was more important for such non Hindu societies than the fundamental human rights of its women.

They wanted their womankind must sacrifice, their fundamental human rights even, to safeguard the self conceived and self decided pride of the society in question.

Therefore, such non Hindu societies always took pride in even Honor Killings instead of granting their womankind their fundamental human rights.

It was doubtlessly a sheer idiocy on the part of such non Hindu societies.

Yet, in their immense ignorance, they made it the question of their own cultural survival.

They practiced Endogamy.

Hinduism never interfered in their cultural freedom.

But it could not allow the non Hindu societies to dictate Hinduism it has also to practice Endogamy.

Because of its own mission of existence, Kr’ñvanto vishvamāryam’, ‘Imām nārīm sukr’té dadhāt’; Hinduism could not, and can never, practice Endogamy.

Endogamy mars its mission of existence itself.

Naturally, Hinduism had, and has, to fight with such non Hindu societies that were not formed on the principle of ‘Live and let live’.

They were formed on the principle of ‘Live and let die’.

Rāxas, Dānav, Daitý, Asur were such non Hindu societies Hinduism had to fight with.

Hinduism never attacked them.

But they never allowed Hinduism to lead its life on its own principles.

They fought for their right of cultural survival.

But they were adamant not to allow Hinduism its own cultural survival.

It was natural for Hinduism not to surrender to the dictatorship of such foolish and grossly unjust non Hindu societies.

It fought with them and survived.

I don’t know what was wrong in it.

Shouldn’t one protect the fundamental human rights of womankind?

Shouldn’t one fight for its own survival if it’s threatened unjustifiably?

Why does Ved support Polygamy?

Indro nirjyotishā tamso gā aduxat

————————————————————————————

1. More On Hinduism

2. On Islam

3. On History

4. Commentary on Ved

5. Science Fiction

6.  Creative Adult Sex in English from Durgesh

7. Durgesh in Hindi/Urdu

———————————————————

More on Hinduism from DSM Satyarthi:

1. ‘Bhoorbhuvah svah!’ ‘The Existence! The Consciousness! The Bliss!’

2.‘Devasy’ pashy’ kaavyam, n’ mamaar, n’ jeeryati.’

3. Hinduism shines

4.Ved is the eternal law book having infinite knowledge in it for human beings

5. ‘According to facts’: ‘Yaathaatathyatah’

6. ‘SET THIS WOMAN for WELL DOER’: ‘Imaam naareem Sukr’te dadhaat’

7. The Evernew Hinduism: Yaathaatathyatah: Ved 2|40|8

8. ‘How to cross death’: ‘Tamev viditvaati mr’tyumeti’: Ved2Yajurved|31|18

9. According to Hinduism: We must be polite, not coward

10.Ye yathaa maam prapadyante taanstathaiv bhajaamyaham: Lord Kr’shn

11. ‘Maachchhitthaa asmaallokaat’ ‘Be not severed from this world’: Ved

12. The mental slavery of the English-educated Indians

——————————————————————————————————————–-

More on Islam from DSM Sayarthi:

1. Bal huv qur’anum majeedun fe LAUHIM MAHFOOZIN

2. Innahu laquranun kareemun Fee kitabin maknoonin

3. ‘Hudallilmuttaqeen’: ‘Guidance for controllers of organs’: 2 Al Baqarah: 2

4. ‘Alaa qalbik litakoon minal-munzireen’ ‘upon your heart one of who to warn’

5. Muslimahs! Come to India. I recommend Hindu lovers for all the Muslimahs.: Khadeejah Muhammad

6. Islam according to Qur’an and Maulana Maududi rahamatullh alaihi

7. A Moment of grave thinking for the entire sophisticated Muslim Community

8. ‘SET THIS WOMAN for WELL DOER’: ‘Imaam naareem Sukr’te dadhaat’

9. ‘V’ innahu fe UMMALKITAABI ladainaa la’liyyun hakeemun’: 43/4

10. Most Present day Muslms don’t do what Huzoor(SAW) did:

11. The Muslim beauties are wooing Hindu men FASTEST

12. ‘What really matters in the sight of God’: Maulana: Maududi

13. Why did Islam face a counter revolution at Karbala?

14. Why there are differences among us?

15. No differences Please!

16. Communal Muslims discuss my Muslim wife, me and my Muslim women: Durgesh


Commentary on Ved from DSM Satyarthi:

1. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

2. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 1| Mantr 2

3. R’gved: Mandal 2| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

4. R’gved: Mandal 3| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

5. R’gved: Mandal 4| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

6. R’gved: Mandal 5| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

7. R’gved: Mandal 6| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

8. R’gved: Mandal 7| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

9. R’gved: Mandal 8| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

10. R’gved: Mandal 9| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

11. R’gved: Mandal 10| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

12. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 1| Mantr 1

13. Saamved: Mantr 1

14. Atharv Ved: Kaand 1| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

Hinduism is BASED on PRINCIPLES, not on any PERSON

Hinduism is BASED on 

PRINCIPLES,

not on any PERSON

DSM Satyarthi

Vedaahametam Purusham Mahaantamaadity’varn’am tamasasparastaat.
tamev viditvaati mr’tyumeti,
NAANYAH PANTHAA VIDYATEY’NAAY’.’
‘I KNOW this man, the END of greatness, to be chosen/having color LIKE SUN,BEYOND THE REACH OF DARKNESS.
KNOWING ONLY HIM, one crosses death.
There isn’t another way to live the life.’

Ved: 2Yajurved: 31|18.

As Islam is based on Kalmae Tayyaba:’La ilah illillah, Muhammadarrasoolallah; Hinduism is based on Gayatri Mantr:
‘Bhoorbhuvah svah!
tatsaviturvarenyam, Bhargo devasy’ dheemahi,
DHIYO YO NAH PRACHODAYAT.’
‘(Vow:)The Existence. The Consciousness. The Bliss. We meditate on the Creator of all, Worthy to be chosen, the Pure, the Divine, Who guide our WISDOM.’

-Ved: 2 Yajurved: Chapter 36/3, Maitraayan’ee Samhita: 1/6/41, 8/18;34;37,41; 3/4/10; Shatpath Brahman’: 3/2/2/6

In Hinduism, this Mantr is called MoolMantr, Mahamantr, Mantrraj, etc.

The main difference between these two basic themes of these two great religions, is:
Kalmae Tayyaba mentions a person.
Gayatri Mantr does not.
It mentions Eishan Parambrahm Paramatma only.
Thus Islam is basically a person oriented religion, while Hinduism is basically immune to any person whosoever.

Every religion that’s oriented to a person more than to principles, is oriented to practices more.

While, every religion oriented to principles more, is more eternal than the rest of them.
Hinduism is based on PRINCIPLES, not on any person whosoever.

It does not mean that Islam is not fit for humankind.

It means only that Hinduism has more coverage for human emotions and human needs than Islam.

Though there are some persons who differ with me even in this view.

They think Islam, as it is at present, does not allow any religious democracy.

They even claim it’s dangerous to humanity itself.

However, Maulana Saiyad Abul Aala Maududi himself writes in this matter:

‘By saying that the Qur’an is inscribed in Umm al-Kitab, attention has been drawn to an important truth.

Different Books had been revealed by Allah in different ages to different Prophets for the guidance of different nations in different languages, but all these Books invited mankind to one and the same Faith: they regarded one and the same thing as the Truth; they presented one and the same criterion of good and evil; they propounded the same principles of morality and civilization; in short, they brought one and the same Din (Religion).

The reason was that their source and origin was the same, only words were different; they had the same meaning and theme which is inscribed in a Source Book with Allah, and whenever there was a need, He raised a Prophet and sent down the same meaning and subject-matter clothed in a particular diction according to the environment and occasion.

Had Allah willed to raise the Prophet Muhammad (upon whom be His peace) in another nation instead of the Arabs, He would have sent down the same Qur’an in the language of that nation. In it the meaning and content would have been expressed according to the environments and conditions of the people and land; the words would have been different and the language also different but the teaching and guidance the same basically, and it would be the same Qur’an though not the Arabic Qur’an. ‘

Towards understanding the Qur’an: 43|1-4

Ved is called: APAURUSHEY‘.
Not written by any man.
Not written by even this man too, who is the END of greatness, to be chosen/having color LIKE SUN, BEYOND THE REACH OF DARKNESS.
KNOWING ONLY HIM, one crosses death.
It’s revealed by EISHAN PARAM BRAHM PARAMATMA, beyond even this man too.
He KNOWS this man’
Vedaahametam Purusham
He isn’t this man Himself:
Dvaa suparn’aa sayujaa sakhaayaa
samaanam vr’xam parishasvajaate.
tayoranyah pippalam svaadvattyanashnannanyo,
abhichaaksheeti.’

‘Two fair guardians/birds with fair wings, never separate, live together ever, on the same tree embracing knit each other.
Out of the two, one eats the sweet fruit of the tree, the Other, eating not, supervises properly.’

Ved: 1 R’gved: 1|164|20

—————————————————————————————

Commentary on Ved from DSM Satyarthi:

1. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

2. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 1| Mantr 2

3. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 5| Mantr 3

4. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 5| Mantr 3

5. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 7| Mantr 5

6. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 7| Mantr 8

4. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 1

5. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 2

6. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 3

7. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 4

8. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 5

9. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 6

10. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 7

11. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 8

12.R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 9

13. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 58| Mantr 6

14. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 164| Mantr 20

15. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 164| Mantr 46

16. R’gved: Mandal 2| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

17 R’gved: Mandal 3| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

18. R’gved: Mandal 3| Sookt 6| Mantr 2

19. R’gved: Mandal 4| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

20. R’gved: Mandal 5| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

21. R’gved: Mandal 6| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

22. R’gved: Mandal 7| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

23. R’gved: Mandal 8| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

24. R’gved: Mandal 9| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

25. R’gved: Mandal 9| Sookt 63| Mantr 4-5

26. R’gved: Mandal 10| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

27. R’gved: Mandal 10| Sookt 85| Mantr 42

28. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 1| Mantr 1

29. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 1| Mantr 2

30. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 1| Mantr 3

31. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 1| Mantr 4

32. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 11| Mantr 1

33. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 13| Mantr 4

34. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 23| Mantr 3

35. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 40| Mantr8

36. Saamved: Mantr 1

37. Sāmved: Mantr 115

38. Sāmved: Mantr 641: Mahānāmnyārchik| 1

39. Sāmved: Mantr 650: Mahānāmnyārchik| 10

40. Sāmved: Mantr 651: Uttarārchik

41. Atharv Ved: Kaand 1| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

42.  Atharv Ved: Kānd 3| Sookt 30| Mantr 3

43. Atharv Ved: Kānd 3| Sookt 30| Mantr 4

44. Atharv Ved: Kānd 3| Sookt 30| Mantr 6

45. Atharv Ved: Kānd 4| Sookt 4| Mantr 6

46. Atharv Ved: Kānd 4| Sookt 4| Mantr 7

47. Atharv Ved: Kānd 4| Sookt 4| Mantr 8

48. Atharv Ved: Kaand 8| Sookt 1| Mantr 6

49. Atharv Ved: Kaand 14| Sookt 1| Mantr 22

50.Atharv Ved: Kaand 14| Sookt 2| Mantr 25