Ved misinterpreted: Correct interpretations

Ved misinterpreted:

Correct interpretations

DSM Satyarthi

Challenger, a hate monger; writes:

Mercy of Hindu woman towards the horse:

Despicable
To insult and humiliate women further, the religious books speak of women having sexual intercourse with animals or expressing desire for intercourse with them. What further insult can be heaped on women.
In ‘Yajur Veda’ such references are found at a number of places where the principal wife of the host is depicted as having intercourse with a horse.

For example consider the following hymn:
“All wife of the host reciting three mantras go round the horse. While praying, they say:’O horse, you are, protector of the community on the basis of good qualities, you are, protector or treasure of happiness. O horse, you become my husband.'” – Yajur Veda 23/19.

The original Mantr:
‘Gan’aanaam tvaa gan’patigvong havaamahe,
priyaan’aam tvaa priy’patigvong havaamahe,
nidheenaam tvaa nidhipatigvong havaamahe,
Vaso! mam aahamajaani garbhadhamaa
tvamajaasi garbhdham.’

‘Of troops thee troop-leader we call,
Of loved ones thee, leader of loved ones we call,
Of treasures thee, lord of treasures we call,
O who arranges dwellings and wealth! Mine. I do know properly the one who makes pregnant.
You know properly the one who makes pregnant.’

Where is there any mention of any horse?

The hate monger writes:
‘Despicable
To insult and humiliate women further, the religious books speak of women having sexual intercourse with animals or expressing desire for intercourse with them. What further insult can be heaped on women.’

We don’t find any such thing in the text.
Instead, on quite contrary, we find here:
‘aahamajaani garbhadhamaa
tvamajaasi garbhdham.’

‘I do know properly the one who makes pregnant.
You know properly the one who makes pregnant.’

Who is this ONE WHO MAKES PREGNANT:’GARBHADH’?
The reciter/writer/revealer of the Mantr knows him PROPERLY:’AA AJAANI’.
The follower/hearer of Mantr also knows him PROPERLY:’TVAM AJAASI’

He is the one famous in Ved:
Udyachchhadhvamap raxo hanaathemaam
naareem SUKR’TE dadhaat.
Dhaataa vipashchit patimasyai vived,
bhago raajaa pur etu prajaanan.

Stand up/Raise ye. Smite away the demons. SET THIS WOMAN for WELL DOER. Inspired holder/guardian must know especially the husband for her. The well knowing politician come first/ahead for her genital organ.’
Ved: 4 Atharv Ved: 14/1/59

Ved is very careful in the matter.
It does not recognize the right of any DUSHKR’T to make a woman pregnant.
It calls them ‘RAXAH”THE DEMONS’.
It orders its followers to stand up, to raise themselves and to SMITE AWAY THE DEMONS:’AP RAXO HANAATH‘.
It orders in clear words:
‘SET THIS WOMAN for WELL DOER’
‘IMAAM NAAREEM SUKR’TE DADHAAT‘.
It allows no carelessness in the matter:
Inspired holder/guardian must know especially the husband for her.’
Dhaataa vipashchit patimasyai vived‘.

Here in Yajurved, it is as careful too as it is in Atharv Ved 14|1|59:
‘I do know properly the one who makes pregnant.
You know properly the one who makes pregnant.’
aahamajaani garbhadhamaa
tvamajaasi garbhdham.’

Only a hate monger,like Challenger, can imagine a horse here.
No such word is there IN TEXT.

Hinduism builds its society on SUKR’TS, not on horses as the hate mongers claim.
Hinduism, thus, builds a society of SUKR’TS’ ‘WELL DOERS’ only.
An evil doer does not have any matrimonial rights, in Hinduism, thus; while the woman marrying him, is not bound to be a well doer.
She may be a well doer, she may be NOT.
Any woman can marry a Sukr’t, even if she does not agree with his system of life.
That’s why PITR’YAGY’, Not MAATR’YAGY’.
That’s why ‘ANUVRATAH PITUH PUTRO’, not ‘Anuvratah MAATUH putro’
That’s why PATRIARCHAL SYSTEM OF HINDUISM, not Matriarchal.
It’s not gender biased actually.
It’s GOOD DEED biased, to build an eternal humane society MARCHING AGGRESSIVELY TO INFINITE DIVINITY always.
Ut devaa avhitam devaa unnyathaa punah,
Utaagashchakrusham devaa devaa jeevyathaa punah.’
Divine ones! Divine ones!
raise up the downtrodden.
And, Divine ones! Divine ones! Make him to live again, who hath done evil.’
Ved: 4 Atharv Ved: 4/13/1

Om ishe tvorjje tvaa vaayav sth’ devo vah savitaa praarpayatu shreshthtamaay’ karman’aapyaayadhvamaghnyaa’in draay’ bhaagam prajaavateeranameevaa’ayaxmaa maa v’ sten eishat maaghshagvagvonso dhruvaa’asmin gopatau syaat bahveeryajmaanasy’ pashoonpaahi.’

‘Om! for food/the energy of desire, thee. For energy, thee. Breezes are ye. Divine Creator impel, you all, to noblest work. Complete properly, Inviolable female! share for the controller of organs.Rich in offspring/subject. Free from sickness. Free from diminishing. No thief rule on you, no evil-praiser. Be constant in this master of ‘go’, numerous! Guard the cattle of the worshiper.’
Ved: 2 Yajurved: 1/1

Lord Kr’shn announces:

‘Yada yada hi dharmasy’ glaanirbhavati, Bhaarat!
abhyutthaanamadharmasy’, tadaatmaanam sr’jaamyaham.
paritraan’aay’ saadhoonaam,
VINAASHAAY’ CH’ DUSHKR’TAAM,
DHARMSANSTHAAPNAARTHAAY’ sambhavaami yuge yuge.’

‘Whenever persons feel humiliation for noble deeds, Bhaarat! and pride on evil deeds; then I create myself. To protect the nobles and to destroy the wickeds, to establish humanity leading to divinity, I do appear in every era.’
Shrimad Bhagvad Geeta: 4/7-8

VINAASHAAY’ CH’ DUSHKR’TAAM’
‘TO DESTROY THE WICKEDS’
DHARMSANSTHAAPNAARTHAAY’
‘to establish humanity leading to divinity’

What is Dharmsansthaapan?
What is establishment of humanity leading to divinity?
Destruction of wickeds: VINAASHAAY’ CH’ DUSHKR’TAAM’
Then who will remain?
Obvously,
SUKR’TS:THE NOBLES.
IMAAM NAAREEM SUKR’TE DADHAAT
‘SET THIS WOMAN FOR WELL DOER.’
To whom particular well doer?
The woman HERSELF will decide it, none else:

Brahmcharyen’ kanyaa yuvaanam vindate patim,
anadvaan brahmcharyen’aashvo ghaasam jigeershati.’

‘By following orders of Brahm, girl obtains a young husband. By following orders of Brahm, a draft ox, a horse, strives to gain food.’
Ved: 4 Atharv Ved: 11/7/18

Only the foolish and childish persons, like Hassan 007, and Challenger; can claim, thus, that women are not given any right, or mistreated, in Hinduism.

The ridiculous thing is, that they claim, a religion, that says women have half authenticity than men for evidences in courts, a religion that does not acknowledge that a woman is raped till there are not four eye witnesses, has given more rights to womankind than Hinduism.
Even blind communalism must have some limits of its idiosyncrasies.

The same Challenger, the same hate monger, in the same post, writes further:

‘After the animal is purified by the priest, the principal wife sleeps near the horse and says: “O Horse, I extract the semen worth conception and you release the semen worth conception'” – Yajur Veda 23/20.’

The hate monger is doing the same what he did in Mantr 23|19.
The original Mantr is:
‘Taa’ubhau chaturah padah samprasaaryaav svarge loke prorn’uvaathaam vr’shaa vaajee retodhaa reto dadhaatu.’

‘They, you both! spread properly four steps. Get, you both! in paradise. You both are producers of rain, holy fighters, capable in semen. Donate semen.’
-Ved: 2 Yajurved: 23|20

Every one can see that there isn’t any horse in the original text. There isn’t any wife of Challenger to sleep with that imaginary horse.
I’m unable to understand why he is so much anxious to make his wife to sleep with a horse.
I can understand that he can’t satisfy her.
So what?
I’m here for it.
He can rely on me that his wife will be fully satisfied.
There isn’t any need to make her sleep with a horse.
Ridiculous.

The four steps to be spread in the Mantr, are Dharm, Arth, Kaam and Mox.
The Mantr says that spreading these four elements, takes the spreaders into paradise:’SVARGE LOKE PRORN’UVAATHAAM’.

The moron writes further:
‘Then the host, while praying to the horse says:
“O horse, please throw semen on the upper part of the anus of my wife. Expand your penis and insert it in the vagina because after insertion, this penis makes women happy and lively” – 23/21.’

He must not worry.
I’ll do these every thing to his wife, and even more whatever she likes to.
However, there isn’t any such nonsense in the Mantr:

‘Utsakthyaa’av gudam dhehi
samanjim chaaryaa, vr’shan!
y’ streen’aam jeevbhojanah.’

‘Between thighs and anus, give. O capable in semen! spread light properly, which is life-food for the women.’
-Ved: 2 Yajurved: 23|21

The Mantr is telling to release semen into proper place, not elsewhere, as the fanatics do. Moreover, it should be done to spread light properly,’SAMANJIM CHAARYAA’, not only to enjoy it.
This act is a responsible act. Don’t take it lightly.
It is arranged so that one can get children and shift his/her debt to Eishan, Divine ones, teacher’s, father’s, mother’s etc. to those children, to continue the great work of spreading light, infinitely.

‘In the Vedic age, the customs of polygamy was prevalent. Each wife spent most of the time devising ways and means to become favorite to her husband.
Clear references are available in ‘Rig Veda’,(14/45),’ and Atharva Veda (3/81)’

R’g Ved 14|45 is wrong reference.
R’g Ved does not have any 14th Mandal.
There are only 10 Mandals in R’g Ved.
It can’t be 14th Ashtak even.
R’g Ved has only 8 Ashtaks.

Atharv Ved 3|81 is again wrong reference.
Atharv Ved Kand/Book 3 contains only 31 Sookts/hymns, NOT 81.

So, there is our Challenger, and his so called challenge.
Om, shanno mitrah, sham varun’ah, shanno bhavatvaryyamaa!

7 comments on “Ved misinterpreted: Correct interpretations

  1. Sri says:

    I too came across that misinterpretation. I was shocked and was looking on google to find out more about it and I got this blog. I am still looking for translation for yajur Ved 23/20/, 23/21 and 23/22.

    Thanks. God bless you for enlightning others on veda. You may like the site http://www.vedmandir.com. Swamiji takes up daily question on veda and answers it in very hort time of week.

  2. Durgesh says:

    Thanks.
    The post is updated since to meet your requirements.

  3. Sri says:

    Thanks Durgesh

    Please see rebuttal by Raju Maliger on “Women In Hinduism” which was widely spread all over the net and which is one we are talking about in above post. They also sent a rebuttal to Abul kasem of Islam-Watch.org who was responsible for spreading the misintrepretation. Please commnet on http://www.satyameva-jayate.org

    There are also many other post which will surprise you!

    Thanks!

  4. Thanks for being the intellectual Kshatria and fight the idiots!

  5. Still Hinduism copied Christianity though, and we have physical evidence of the Resurrection

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s