Vidva ch’ vedehi samechch dhammam
Intellectuals ACQUIRE KNOWLEDGE FROM VED
The British Government of India was facing more problems from Hindus than those from the Muslims.
That’s why it tried to divide Hindus more and more,while the same British Government of India, tried to unite Muslims more and more.
It, on its own accord, called Sir Saiyad Ahmad Khan, and proposed him to run a movement for a separate Muslim University.
Why did it go to all the trouble?
Because it wanted to do something good for the Muslims?
The British Government was never so good.
Neither for Muslims, nor for Hindus.
Both the Muslims and Hindus were dirty black Indian dogs for it.
It did never even try to hide this inhuman attitude to the Muslims and Hindus both.
They were the WHITE DEMONS who were ruling India then.
They did not value humanity.
They valued color more, in actual practice.
Why then this concern to the Muslims?
Because they had tasted the bitter taste of Hindu Muslim Unity in 1857:
So, they started to unite Muslims and divide Hindus in as many divisions as they could.
Obsolete Manusmr’ti was also found out for the same purpose, published, and was given undue importance.
The classical division of Hindus, Baudddhs, Jains and Sikhs was also brought into existence to serve their same vile, dirty, and quite inhuman political interests.
They claimed that Sikhs are not Hindus.
What a ridiculous idea it was.
The Sikhs were Hindus who sacrificed themselves to protect Hindus and Hinduism.
It was the very purpose of Sikhism.
And, the dirty liars, the dirty cheaters; claimed:’The Hindus who sacrifice themselves to protect Hindus and Hinduism ARE NOT HINDUS.’
Lord Buddh himself was a Hindu.
Go through ‘Suttnipaat’.
Its verse 292 tells us:
‘Samam samaadaay’ vataani jantu,
uchchaavacham gachchhati sanysatto.
Vidvaa ch’ vedehi samechch dhammam,
n’ uchchaavacham gachchhati bhooripanyo.’
‘Non Dvij persons are always unbalanced as they don’t control their organs.
But the intellectuals WHO ACQUIRE KNOWLEDGE FROM VED are never unbalanced & are full of multi knowledge.’
You can verify it.
The reference is already given by me.
It’s interesting that Muslims ruled India more, than the British.
‘Although the British East India Company had earlier administered the factory areas established for trading purposes, its victory in the Battle of Plassey in 1757 marked the beginning of its rule in India. The victory was consolidated in 1764 at the Battle of Buxar (in Bihar), when the defeated Mughal emperor, Shah Alam II, granted control of Bengal, Bihar, and Orissa to the Company. The Company soon expanded its territories around its bases in Bombay and Madras: the Anglo-Mysore Wars (1766–1799) and the Anglo-Maratha Wars (1772–1818) gave it the control of most of India south of the Narmada River.’
The East India company rule was started from its victory in the Battle of Plassey in 1757.
After exactly 100 years, it faced the first INDEPENDENCE WAR OF INDIA, in 1857.
After more 90 years only, in 1947, India won its Independence.
Only 190 years of the British rule, thus, on India.
More on Hinduism from DSM Satyarthi:
2. More On Hinduism
3. On Islam
4. On History
More on Islam from DSM Sayarthi:
20. Saamved: Mantr 1