Ved 1 R’g Ved: Mandal 9| Sookt 63| Mantr 4-5

Ved: 1R’gved:

Mandal 9|Sookt 63| Mantr 4-5

Mission of Life/Existence

DSM Satyarthi

—————————————————————————————

Été asr’gramāshavo’ti hvarānsi babhravah,

somā r’tasý dhārayā.4

Indram vardhanto apturah ‘Kr’ñvanto Vishvamāryam

apaghnanto arāvñah.5

—————————————————————————————-

1These Swift flowing tawny colored Somās2, with a stream of eternal truth3, let loose/proceed4,4 augmenting Indr5, urging the utmost beautiful young girls and ladies6, making all better7, destroying the withholders85.

—————————————————————————————-

1. R’shi: Nidhruvi Mahimvat Kāshyap

Dévtā: Pavmān Som

Chhand/Meter: Gāyatrī

This very important Mantr of R’gved deals with the Mission of Life/Existence: ‘Kr’ñvanto Vishvamāryam.

2. ‘Babhravah Somā’ in original text.

Due to Communal Nationalism, it’s advertised very much that the whites/blacks have more sex in their bodies than the rest of the others.

This Mantr contradicts this much-publicized popular belief.

It’s one thing a belief to be popular.

It’s quite another thing that that popular belief maybe a scientific fact too.

So many things are very much popular in different races, castes, political groups and social groups.

But all of them are not scientific facts, neither they can be.

Being a follower of Eīshān Param Brahm Paramātmā/Ved your utmost basic faith is in Gāyatrī Mantr:

Bhūrbhuvah svah. Tatsaviturvaréñýam bhargo dévasý dhīmahi dhiyo yo nah prachodayāt.’

The Existence, the Consciousness, the Bliss.  (Vow 🙂 we meditate on that Creator of all that is Worthy to be chosen, infinitely Pure, and Divine, that impel our wisdoms.’

Ved: 2 Yajurvéd: 36|3

This basic faith separates you from the rest of the others.

You refuse to let anything/anyone, except Eīshān Param Brahm Paramātmā, impel your wisdoms while the rest of the persons don’t.

It’s advertised very much that the whites/blacks have more sex in their bodies than the rest of the others.

This Mantr contradicts this much-publicized belief.

It says as far as the color of the male body is concerned, it’s BROWN, instead of black/white that’s the utmost sexiest male body.

It is confirmed by history too.

Most Hindus in India are brown, and their ancestors have given the humanity everfirst scientific study in sex: Tantr, Kāmsūtr, Anangrang, Nāgar Sarvasvam, Rati Rahasý, Panch Sāyak etc.

The Dévtā, divine subject, of the Mantrs, as already told in the footnote 1, is Pavmān Som.

In Vedic Sanskr’t, it means the Som that purifies, consecrates.

It means there are other kinds of Som too.

Yet, what Eishān Param Brahm Paramātmā/Ved means here by Som, is Pavmān Som, the Som that purifies, consecrates, not anything/anybody else.

According to Samhitā Bhāshý of Yajurved, Kapishŧhal Kaŧh Samhitā, Som does mean:

‘‘Ath saumyah. Somo rétodhāh. Mithun év réto dadhāti.’

Now about Som. Somās are the bearer/holder/possessor of semen. Only the couple authorized for sexual intercourse bears semen.’

Kapishŧhal Kaŧh Samhitā 46/2 pp.317/323-324

3. The words ‘Somās with a stream of eternal truth’ ‘Somā r’tasý dhārayā’ are quite significant.

It is the condition.

Somās must not be without ‘a stream of eternal truth’ ‘Somā r’tasý dhārayā’.

Even the eternal truth ‘R’tmust not be rigid/inflexible.

4. ‘Asr’gram’ in original text.

5. Not fighting with a person who controls his/her organ, instead augmenting, expanding him/her.

The main difference between an uncultured animal and a civilized person is that an uncultured animal does not control his/her organs in any matter whatsoever.

S/he does whatsoever s/he wants to do without thinking of its consequences.

Eishān Param Brahm Paramātmā/Ved/Hinduism does not want that its followers should act so irrationally and so unscientifically.

Western culture, if it really can be called a culture at all, has broken all the limits the civilized society had injunctioned.

The ultimate transgression, it has resorted to, is its non-conditional surrender to incest.

What more a society can lose to call itself uncivilized?

If even incest is a civilized practice what is uncivilized and why?

Western culture, thus, has completely surrendered to animal needs of a human being.

The question is why it shouldn’t, if there isn’t any God and the human beings are only a result of animal Evolution.

Why can’t it be conceived that Eishān Param Brahm Paramātmā Himself has chosen Evolution as a means to create human beings?

Why can’t it be conceived that to be a human being is not the ultimate stage of Evolution?

That’s what the reincarnation in Hinduism.

What else?

It’s now evident that we human beings are also a form of energy.

Then why can’t we take other forms of energy as well?

Isn’t opposing reincarnation is now totally unscientific and irrational?

Why can’t it be conceived that after humanity, there’s a further stage of Evolution, Divinity,  also waiting human beings?

Why human beings imagine divine attributes ab initio?

From where they get these imaginations if no such state as Divinity exists anywhere at all?

Ved: R’gved: Mandal 1: Sookt 33: Mantr 2: Explanatory Note 8

6. ‘Apturah’.

Unlike other religions, Hinduism does not stop its followers to love beautiful girls and women.

A Hindu is not only allowed to do so, he is even ordered instead:

Udyachchhadhvamap raxo hanāthémām nārīm sukr’té dadhāt.

Dhātā vipashchit patimasyai vivéd bhago rājā pur étu prajānan.’

‘Stand up/Raise ye. Smite away the demons. Set this woman for well doer. Inspired holder/guardian must know especially the husband for her. The well knowing politician come first/ahead for her genital organ.’

Ved: 4 Atharv Ved|Kānd 14|Sookt 1| Mantr 59

Hinduism does not instruct its followers not to love a beautiful girl/woman.

But, it says instead:

Smarañam kīrtanam kélih prexañam guhyabhāñam,

Sankalpo’dhyavasāyashch’ kriyānivr’attirév ch.’

1To remember 2to talk about, 3playing, 4to watch, 5clandestine exchange, 6determination, 7effort, and 8ultimate act.’

Any act, out of these eight acts, constitutes sexual intercourse according to Hinduism.

If you remember someone as your sex partner, talk about; play with having the intention, watch someone, exchange clandestinely, determined to do it, do effort for it and unite in ultimate act, every step/action out of these eight, is termed sexual intercourse in Hinduism.

Once you do it, it is a marriage according to Hinduism/Eishān Param Brahm Paramātmā/Ved.

You can’t run away from marital responsibilities according to Hinduism/Eishān Param Brahm Paramātmā/Ved if you even only do once anyone of these:

Brāhmo daivastathaivārshah prājāpatyastathāāsurah,

Gāndharvo rāxasashchaiv paishāchashchāshŧamo’dhamah.’

1Brāhm, 2Daiv, 3Ārsh, 4Prājāpatý, 5Āsur, 6Gāndharv, 7Rāxas, and eighth 8Paishāch utmost worst.

Manu Smr’ti: 3|21

Ashŧmaithunam comes under Gāndharv Vivāh, if it’s with mutual consent.

If it is not with mutual consent, and some deceit or force is used, it comes under 5Āsur, 7Rāxas, or eighth 8Paishāch utmost worst kind of marriage.

The persons responsible for it, thus, can’t run away from marital responsibilities anyhow.

7. ‘Kr’ñvanto Vishvamāryam’.

Though it is necessary to make all better to be Pavmān Som for it, it must never be forgotten that your Mission of life/existence is actually ‘Kr’ñvanto Vishvamāryam’ ‘Making all better’, neither ‘‘indram vardhantah’ ‘Augmenting Indr’, nor ‘Apturah’ ‘Urging the utmost beautiful young girls and ladies6.

Never imitate/follow Musalmīn who choose the parts of Āyāt-e-Qur’ān of their own vile selfish interests and leave the rest of the Qur’ān-o-Aħādīs, for even the explanation of those parts.

They do it to justify their terrorist/selfish vile activities.

The true Musalmīn never do resort to these vile practices.

You have to be ‘Som’, ‘Somā r’tasý dhārayā’ ‘with a stream of eternal truth’, never without it.

If you try to be Som without ‘ r’tasý dhārayā’ ‘without a stream of eternal truth’, neither you can be Som, nor you can fight a holy war of your Mission of life/existence Kr’ñvanto Vishvamāryam.

You can’t choose some things from Our System that interest you more and expect from Us/Our System, to work in your vile/selfish favor always.

You can never cheat Us/Our System. Even if you want to.

You have to take Our entire System to follow if you really want to get benefited from it.

Moreover, it is not applicable to your spouse(s)/family too that they all will be benefited from Us/Our System if only you follow Us/Our System.

Everyone of your spouse(s)/family has his/her own Karmphal/Bhogchakr.

If one could manage the Karmphal/Bhogchakr of his/her spouse(s)/family, in this way; there was no necessity of Lord Vishñu to deceive Tulsī and Vr’ndā ever.

8. ‘Apaghnanto arāvñah’.

The persons who surrender to the withholders due to any reason(s) whatsoever, can’t do Kr’ñvanto Vishvamāryam.

They may have any reason(s) whatsoever to surrender to the withholders, howsoever valid in their own eyes; nevertheless, it is a fact that Kr’ñvanto Vishvamāryam cannot be done, practically, until and unless you don’t destroy the withholders ‘Apaghnanto arāvñah’.

There isn’t a middle way between destroying the withholders ‘Apaghnanto arāvñah’ and surrendering to them.

If you don’t destroy them, they would destroy you.

Why do you think they withhold you while you don’t withhold them?

If they were really as immune to you as they claim/you think, why do they withhold you at all?

In addition, why don’t you withhold them while they withhold you?

Are you fool enough not to recognize your enemies?

Arjun acted in the same way before Mahā Bhārat.

Did Lord Kr’shñ allow him to do so?

If yes, why Shrīmad Bhagavad Gītā was preached to Arjun?

Why didn’t Lord Kr’shñ left Arjun to his own point of view?

Why did he discuss with him for such a long time?

If they were really your friends, as they/you claim, shouldn’t both of you be honest to each other mutually?

If you are honest to them but they are not honest to you, isn’t it harmful and dangerous to you and to the society of nobles, Sukr’ts, you belong to?

Yes, you can have friendship with them if they are really honest to your friendship.

But how a person can be honest to anyone who is not honest even to him/her self?

Yes, you can form even a government with Vr’trs even, as your partners.

But how can you sit satisfied with such a mixed government, for ever?

You have to make even your partners better; if you really do have your conviction to Trishapt/humanity leading to divinity.

Naturally, you can’t leave Trishapt only to join some government.

If you do it, it means your Vr’tr partners, in government, are more dedicated to their vr’tratv than you are dedicated to your Hindutv.

Isn’t it a moment for you to die of shame?

You have to decide seriously whether you want to worship Us or not.

You can’t tolerate this question indefinitely.

Sooner or later, you have to decide it.

Of course, you can prefer vr’tratv on your Hindutv.

No one is compelling you to embrace Our Hindutv.

The only thing We want from you, is to be brave and honest enough to declare to Our followers whether you are one of them or not, sincerely.

If you hate/ridicule/criticize Hinduism and/or its Trishapt, Seven Principles, Sapt Maryādās, naturally you must be brave, honest, enough to declare that you are not a Hindu anymore.

You must declare that only your father/forefathers were Hindus.

Hindus think you are one of them while you definitely are not so.

If you were one of Hindus, naturally you were not hating/ridiculing/criticizing Hinduism every now and then.

Why are you having a name, Hindu, that is such a hateful/ridiculous/ worthy to be criticized name for you?

Only because your father/forefathers had it?

But they were not hating/ridiculing/criticizing Hinduism every now and then.

Of course you can do it even your father/forefathers didn’t do it.

But you must be brave and honest enough to tell the other Hindus that such is the case, so that they should not have any favorable expectations from you.

Since a very very long time, the Hindu society is suffering heavily from its such dangerous and harmful mistake(s).

They plan to fight with anti Hindus, thinking you are one of them, while you are certainly not.

You are actually one of the withholders, arāvñah, they should get rid of and destroy ultimately if you want/plan to destroy them.

R’gved: Mandal 10| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

———————————————————————————————————————-

1.  More Commentary on Ved

2. More On Hinduism

3. On Islam

4. On History

5. Science Fiction

6.  Creative Adult Sex in English from Durgesh

7. Durgesh in Hindi/Urdu

——————————————————————

More commentary on Ved from DSM Satyarthi:

1. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

2. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 1| Mantr 2

3. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 5| Mantr 3

4. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 5| Mantr 3

5. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 7| Mantr 5

6. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 7| Mantr 8

4. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 1

5. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 2

6. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 3

7. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 4

8. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 5

9. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 6

10. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 7

11. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 8

12.R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 9

13. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 33| Mantr 1

14. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 33| Mantr 2

14. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 58| Mantr 6

15. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 164| Mantr 20

16. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 164| Mantr 46

17. R’gved: Mandal 2| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

18 R’gved: Mandal 3| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

19. R’gved: Mandal 3| Sookt 6| Mantr 2

20. R’gved: Mandal 4| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

21. R’gved: Mandal 4| Sookt 26| Mantr 2

22. R’gved: Mandal 5| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

23. R’gved: Mandal 6| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

24. R’gved: Mandal 7| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

25. R’gved: Mandal 8| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

26. R’gved: Mandal 9| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

27. R’gved: Mandal 9| Sookt 63| Mantr 4-5

28. R’gved: Mandal 10| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

29. R’gved: Mandal 10| Sookt 85| Mantr 42

30. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 1| Mantr 1

31. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 1| Mantr 2

32. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 1| Mantr 3

33. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 1| Mantr 4

34. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 11| Mantr 1

35. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 13| Mantr 4

36. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 23| Mantr 3

37. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 31| Mantr 18

38. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 40| Mantr2

39. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 40| Mantr8

40. Saamved: Mantr 1

41. Sāmved: Mantr 115

42. Sāmved: Mantr 641: Mahānāmnyārchik| 1

43. Sāmved: Mantr 650: Mahānāmnyārchik| 10

44. Sāmved: Mantr 651: Uttarārchik

45. Atharv Ved: Kaand 1| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

46.  Atharv Ved: Kānd 3| Sookt 30| Mantr 3

47. Atharv Ved: Kānd 3| Sookt 30| Mantr 4

48. Atharv Ved: Kānd 3| Sookt 30| Mantr 6

49. Atharv Ved: Kānd 4| Sookt 4| Mantr 6

50. Atharv Ved: Kānd 4| Sookt 4| Mantr 7

51. Atharv Ved: Kānd 4| Sookt 4| Mantr 8

52. Atharv Ved: Kaand 4| Sookt 13| Mantr 1

53. Atharv Ved: Kaand 8| Sookt 1| Mantr 6

54. Atharv Ved: Kaand 8| Sookt 4| Mantr 22

55.  Atharv Ved: Kaand 14| Sookt 1| Mantr 22

56.Atharv Ved: Kaand 14| Sookt 2| Mantr 25

———————————————————————————–———–

More on Ved from DSM Satyarthi:

1. ‘According to facts’: ‘Yaathaatathyatah’

2. According to Hinduism: We must be polite, not coward

3. Aheism can’t win Hinduism/Ved

4. Casteism is NOT an intgral part of Hinduism:’Samaanee prapaa sah vonnabhaagah’ ”Same drinking same share of food.’

5. Hinduism builds its society on SUKR’TS/Noble doers:’Imaam naareem Sukr’te dadhaat’

6. Hinduism is PRINCIPLES BASED , not PERSON BASED

7. One should not wish to die: Ved hates death

8. RELIGIOUS DEMOCRACY in Hinduism: Ekam sadvipra bahudhaa vadanti

9. Sanyas is not the goal of Hinduism

10. Sati tradition was an Aasur Tradition, not Vedic at all

11 comments on “Ved 1 R’g Ved: Mandal 9| Sookt 63| Mantr 4-5

  1. […] Only your noble wishes can’t establish what is allotted to you as the mission of your entire life/existence. […]

  2. […] has instructed us not to confine ourselves to the principles only i.e. Ved, but  to the very Mission of Life/Existence ‘Kr’ñvanto Vishvamāryam’ Dharm Santānam, Dharm Sansthāpan, as well; to bring the […]

  3. […] Kr’ñvanto Vishvamāryam/Dharmsantānam/ Dharmsansthāpan/Aqāmat-e-Ħukūmat-e-Ilāhī/Establishing Kingdom of God cannot be completed ever, if the distribution of assets bestowed by Us on entire humankind isn’t proper optimum. […]

  4. […] Most of the commentators from Brāhm denomination of Hinduism, not only insist but they even persistently keep arguing that ‘Vajr’ does not mean sexual male organ of a male that controls his organs and never uses any of his thus controlled organs against Our movement ‘Kr’ñvanto Vishvamāryam. […]

  5. […] they don’t oppose Our movement Kr’ñvanto Vishvamāryam/ Aqāmat-e-Ħukūmat-e-Ilāhī/Establishing the Kingdom of God/Dharmsantānam/Dharmsansthāpan, […]

Leave a Reply to Ved: Ved Bhāshý: R’gved: Mandal 1: Sūkt 33: Mantr 2 « Hinduism according to Ved: DSM Satyarthi Cancel reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s