Sex for Consecration only: Pavmān Som

Sex for Consecration only

Pavmān Som

DSM Satyarthi

Pavmān Som is the one who has sex for consecration, not for animal desires or children.

Hinduism/Ved does not support the view that one should marry for sex or children.

Both the concepts are erroneous and not good for human society.

Hinduism does not believe that human beings are only social animals.

Of course, it believes in the principle that when born, the infants are not better than animals:

Vitishŧhantām māturasyā upasthānnānāroopā pashavo jāýmānāh.

Sumangalyup sīdémamagnim. sampatnī, pratibhhoshéh dévān.’

Let there come forth from the genital organ of this mother, animals of various forms, being born.

Well doing woman, sit by the man leading to light. Proper wife, ornamentize here the divine ones.’

Ved: 4 Atharv Ved:14| 2| 25

Yet, it does classify the infants in two classes:

1. ‘Pratibhhoshéh dévān’ ‘the divine ones.’

2. The ordinary human infants who don’t show any inclination towards divinity whatsoever.

The first type of children is entrusted to their mothers, whether the mothers are the followers of Ved or not.

Even Kaikasī could not convert Vibhīshañ to Rāxasism.

This type of infants, therefore, can be safely entrusted to even such mothers.

Islamic policy in this subject differs with Hinduism altogether.

It says:

V’ lā tankiħū almusharikāti ħattā yu’minn.’

‘Don’t marry almusharikāti until they bring Īmān.’

— Al Qur’an Al Majīd: 2 Al Baqara| 221

Al Qur’an Al Majīd allowedNikāħ-e-Kitābiyah’:

Alyaum uħill lakumuttayyibātu v’ t’åāmullazīn ūtulkitāb ħillallakum v’ t’åāmukum ħillallahum valmuħsanātu minal Mu’mināti valmuħsanātu minallazīn ūtulkitāb min qablikum izā ātaitumūhunn ujūrahunn  muħsinīn ghair musāfiħīn v’ lā muttakħizī akħdānin.’

This day are all good things made lawful for you. The food of those who have received the Scripture is lawful for you, and your food is lawful for them. And so are the virtuous women of the believers and the virtuous women of those who received the Scripture before you, when ye give them their marriage portions and live with them in honor, not in fornication, nor taking them as secret concubines.’

Al Qur’an Al Majīd: 5 Al Māedah|5

But practically, some Saħābīs stopped it too, after watching the impracticality of ‘Nikāħ-e-Kitābiyah’ forMusalmeen.

Even Maulānah Saiyad Abul Åālā Maudūdī writes:

‘No doubt, it is a big fitnah, chaos.

In India, Egypt, Syria etc. countries it affected only to the extent, that the Ma’ams, entering the Islamic social system, shattered the Islamic culture vastly.

But in Turkey, its political results too, have been proved dangerous.

This is one of the important reasons that destroyed the vast Sultanate of Turks.

Due to it, if some sympathetic Musalmeen feel the need of its abolition, it’s absolutely proper.’

—‘Nikāħ-e-Kitābiyah’: Tafahīmāt 2: Markazī maktabah Islamī, Delhi edition, January 1981 pp. 314. Translation from original Urdu: DSM Satyarthi

These are the two approaches, two great religions, Hinduism and Islam adopt in this matter.

Of course, Hinduism itself has gone through these bitter experiences several times in its longest history right from the beginning.

Yet, it never surrenders to the evil to the extent, not to take the responsibilities of even the women not accepting Vedic system of life.

It always accepted the challenge.

It never ran away from its responsibilities.

It reasons, if a bad woman too, can’t find shelter in a system claiming to be conceived,structured and given by Eishān Param Brahm Paramātmā Himself, why Eishān Param Brahm Paramātmā made her ab initio.

Did Eishān Param Brahm Paramātmā not know she would be a bad woman?

Isn’t He All-knowing?

However, even in Hinduism, as soon as she is a mother, a woman is required to change her heretofore-irresponsible attitude, and act welldoer, ‘Sumangalī’ .

Remember, she is required to change her attitude,Sumangalī, not her religion, as it is required in Islamic system of life.

Her religion is never attacked in Hinduism, whatsoever it may be.

It maybe discussed with her peacefully, if she consents to it.

Ifshe does not consent to discuss it, it can’t even be discussed with her against her will.

In Hinduism, religion is always a matter of rationality.

Even in Islam too, there is no compulsion in religion.

لَا إِكْرَاهَ فِي الدِّينِ ۖ قَد تَّبَيَّنَ الرُّشْدُ مِنَ الْغَيِّ ۚ فَمَن يَكْفُرْ بِالطَّاغُوتِ وَيُؤْمِن بِاللَّهِ فَقَدِ اسْتَمْسَكَ بِالْعُرْوَةِ الْوُثْقَىٰ لَا

انفِصَامَ لَهَا ۗ وَاللَّهُ سَمِيعٌ عَلِيمٌ

La ikraha fiddeeni qad tabayyana alrrushdu min’ alghayyi faman yakfur bialttaghooti wayumin biAllahi faqadi istamsaka bialAAurwati alwuthqa la infisama laha waAllahu sameeAAun AAaleemun.

There is no compulsion in religion. The right direction is henceforth distinct from error. And he who rejecteth false deities and believeth in Allah hath grasped a firm handhold which will never break. Allah is Hearer, Knower.’

–Al Qur’an Al Kareem: 2 Al Baqarah: 256

Yet, Islam insists on Virtuous women, valmuħsanātu,only:

Alyaum uħill lakumuttayyibātu v’ t’åāmullazīn ūtulkitāb ħillallakum v’ t’åāmukum ħillallahum valmuħsanātu minal Mu’mināti valmuħsanātu minallazīn ūtulkitāb min qablikum izā ātaitumūhunn ujūrahunn  muħsinīn ghair musāfiħīn v’ lā muttakħizī akħdānin.’

This day are all good things made lawful for you. The food of those who have received the Scripture is lawful for you, and your food is lawful for them. And so are the virtuous women of the believers and the virtuous women of those who received the Scripture before you, when ye give them their marriage portions and live with them in honor, not in fornication, nor taking them as secret concubines.’

Al Qur’an Al Majīd: 5 Al Māedah|5

Hinduism orders:

Imām nārīm Sukr’te dadhāt

without any condition whatsoever.

It orders every woman must have a Sukr’t husband whether she is herself virtuous or not.

Her reformation is also entrusted in Hinduism with the Sukr’t husband.

It’s his duty to reform her peacefully and with all her willingness.

Only because she is a woman, she must have a Sukr’t husband whether she is herself virtuous or not.

This is the sex for consecration Hinduism insists on so aggressively that it orders:

Ap raxo hanāth even.

It does not compromise in the matter ever.

That’s why Lord Kr’shñ even fought with Rukmiñī’s relations and the persons who helped them.

The second type of infants is ordered to be watched, with close scrutiny, by the Sukr’t father himself.

However, both types of children are instructed to follow the Sukr’t father only, not the mother.

She must be cared fornot to be disheartened, however:

Anuvratah pituh putro, mātrā bhavatu sammanāh.

Jāyā patyé madhumatīm vācham vadatu shantivām.’

Ved: 4 Atharv Ved: 3| 30| 2, Paippalād Samhitā: 5| 19| 2

Moreover, if the sex is for sex only, i.e. for Animal Pleasure, or for children, the human beings are not any different from animals.

The animals also do the same.

One can’t fight, rationally and effectively, against Niyog or incest if we accept such a concept.

Only the concept that the sex must be for the consecration of the human society can cure both these evil social diseases.

Hinduism builds its Society on Sukr’ts/Noble doers 

Indro nirjyotishā tamso gā aduxat

Why does Ved support Polygamy?

———————————————————-

More on Ved from DSM Satyarthi:

1. ‘According to facts’: ‘Yaathaatathyatah’

2. According to Hinduism: We must be polite, not coward

3. Aheism can’t win Hinduism/Ved

4. Casteism is NOT an intgral part of Hinduism:’Samaanee prapaa sah vonnabhaagah’ ”Same drinking same share of food.’

5. Hinduism builds its society on SUKR’TS/Noble doers:’Imaam naareem Sukr’te dadhaat’

6. Hinduism is PRINCIPLES BASED , not PERSON BASED

7. One should not wish to die: Ved hates death

8. RELIGIOUS DEMOCRACY in Hinduism: Ekam sadvipra bahudhaa vadanti

9. Sanyas is not the goal of Hinduism

10. Sati tradition was an Aasur Tradition, not Vedic at all

————————————————————————————–

1. Commentary on Ved

2. More On Hinduism

3. On Islam

4. On History

5. Science Fiction

6.  Creative Adult Sex in English from Durgesh

7. Durgesh in Hindi/Urdu

18 comments on “Sex for Consecration only: Pavmān Som

  1. […] Pavmān Som, the one who has sex for consecration, not for animal desires or […]

  2. […] « Ved: 3 Sāmved: Mantr 650: Mahānāmnyārchik| 10 Pavmān Som […]

  3. […] Not MAATR’YAGY’. That’s why ‘ANUVRATAH PITUH PUTRO‘, not ‘Anuvratah MAATUH putro‘ That’s why PATRIARCHAL SYSTEM OF HINDUISM, not Matriarchal. It’s not gender […]

  4. […] is seeing the problem only with sex angle. And if ONLY sex is important in human life, his stand is quite correct. It is also correct […]

  5. […] celestial system is balanced optimum3. By Eternal Truth Ādityās stand4. In the celestial system, Som is set […]

  6. […] An ideal love maker, ‘Vansagah’, is the one who makes love to please his beloved forever. […]

  7. […] sophisticated persons criticized me vehemently for my such Pavmān Som […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s