Ved: 1 R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 7| Mantr 8

Ved: 1 R’gved:

Mandal 1| Sookt 7| Mantr 8

Ashŧak 1| Adhyāý 1| Anuvāk 2| Varg 14

Ideal Love Maker: DSM Satyarthi

———————————————————————————–——————-

Vr’shā yūthév vansagah kr’shŧīriyartyojasā. Eīshāno apratishkutah.

———————————————————————

1Like the herds of the cows, of the bull capable to have an orgasm2, ideal love maker3, attains the human beings4 with dominant elegance5. Eīshān does never negate6.

———————————————————————-

1. R’shi: Madhuchchhandā Mahimvat Vaishvāmitr

Dévtā/Divine Subject: Indr, the controller of organs

Chhand/Meter: Pipīlikāmadhyā Nichr’dGāyatrī

2. You must act exactly akin to a bull in this matter.

You lose human beings if you act otherwise.

You must never fight this inherent tendency in you.

It is not harmful to the human society.

If it were, We haven’t allowed it to be inherent in you.

Never allow yourself to be a prey for the evil ones.

They always talk of justice, but never actually mean it.

If possible, they would always be the first to do injustice to others.

That’s why this movement is not based on well talkers, ‘Suvaktr’.

It is based on Sukr’ts, well doers.

We are not proposing talks here.

We are proposing actions:

Kurvannévéh karmāñi jijīvishéchchhagvong samāh,

Évam tvayi nānyathéto’sti n’ karm lipyaté naré.’

Ved: Yajurved: 40|2

‘Doing Karm only, here, one should wish

to live hundreds of years.

Only this is the way for thee, none else;

So Karm cleaveth not to man.’

Never believe on what they say.

Always watch what they do:

Mukham padmdalākāram vāchā chandanshītalā,

Hr’dayam krodhsanyuktam, trividham dhūrtlaxañam.’

‘Face as handsome as a flock of lotuses, speech as cooling as sandalwood, heart is full of fury, the three are symptoms of a perfidious.’

A Sukr’t must never decline polygamy, if he is capable.

In a system of life that never compromises with the matrimonial right to the evil doers, polygamy cannot be negated absolutely.

It cannot be denied that there may be a time too, when Sukr’ts are not so many in numbers, enough to practice monogamy with the entire womankind.

What is another practical option then except polygamy for Sukr’ts?

Yes, the evil doers can raise hell on it.

They can protest that only monogamy is a human practice, polygamy is an animalistic.

But, all their protest must be faced bravely to establish a human society marching ahead aggressively to infinite divinity.

Fight with the evil doers for the cause:

Udyachchhadhvamap raxo hanāthémām nārīm sukr’té dadhāt.

Dhātā vipashchit patimasyai vivéd bhago rājā pur étu prajānan.’

Stand up/Raise ye. Smite away the demons. Set this woman for well doer. Inspired holder/guardian must know especially the husband for her. The well knowing politician come first/ahead for her genital organ.’

Ved: 4 Atharv Ved: 14| 1| 59

3. An ideal love maker, ‘Vansagah’, is not the one who makes love to please his beloved for the time being only.

An ideal love maker, ‘Vansagah’, is the one who makes love to please his beloved forever.

How it can please forever his beloved if the future of her children is not safe in a corrupt and wicked society?

It is an established fact now that Polygamy is now almost out of our civilized systems of life.

Only some Islamic countries are practicing it now.

They claim Al Qur’an Al Kareem and Islam allow it.

‘Allow it’, Not order it.

Yet, it’s legal there.

The countries that practice monogamy always ridicule it, always criticize it and claim it’s against humanity.

Why?

They claim it’s a grand oppression on womankind.

Their claim is of course true if all the husbands are really Sukr’ts.

Is it true?

The oppression on womankind is still there if a husband is not a Sukr’t.

Monogamy has not stopped it.

Monogamy is not successful in stopping the oppression on womankind.

It’s only a lollipop the present civilized society has presented to the womankind.

Hinduism was stressing its optimum on humankind that it’s the only way to end the oppression on womankind to necessitate a Sukr’t and Sukr’t husband only.

If a man is not Sukr’t he must never be allowed to have any matrimonial rights at all.

The womankind was agreeing with Hinduism and avoiding a dushkr’t almost always as a husband.

The societies that were formed only to get rid of constant reforms Hinduism was adamant to bring in the mankind were upset how to face this practical problem.

Their own womankind was not only opting for a Hindu husband, they were resorting to have at least a clandestine Hindu lover, if it was not possible for them to have a Hindu husband.

The concerned societies were not worried of the oppression on their womankind.

They were never.

And to speak a never unspoken bold truth, they are not still now.

They have never considered it even as a possible option to end the oppression on their womankind to be Sukr’t themselves.

If they had there was nothing else to stop them from joining Hinduism.

Instead of doing this, they proposed monogamy and divorce to score on Hindus, to their own womankind.

Hence the monogamy and divorce were devised by non Hindu societies.

It was not for the benefit of their womankind to get rid of the oppression of their mankind.

No, it was not.

It was only claimed to be so.

Actually it was a lollipop to their own womankind to keep them away from a Hindu husband/ Hindu lover.

Gradually such non Hindu societies even started to claim, entirely shamelessly, that Hinduism oppresses womankind.

It practices polygamy and requires from womankind never to resort to any divorce at all:

Ihaiv stam mā vi yaushŧam vishvamāyurvyashnutam,

Krīdantau putrairnaptr’bhirmodmānau své gr’hé.’

‘Remain ye both only here. Don’t be separated. Enjoy whole life sporting with sons grandsons, rejoicing in your own home.’

Ved: R’gved: 10|85|42

‘‘Ihaiv stam mā vi yaushŧam vishvamāyurvyashnutam,

Krīdantau putrairnaptr’bhirmodmānau svastakau.’

‘Remain ye both only here. Don’t be separated. Enjoy whole life sporting with sons grandsons, rejoicing in the beautiful home.’

Ved: Atharv Ved: 14|1|22

Their womankind fell for it because they were never told the true facts.

They were taught not to be educated.

Why education for women at all?

Why should they learn anything except to please their own mankind?

It explains why the non Hindu societies were so adamant not to educate their own womankind.

Their education liberated their women and sent them to Hindus.

When they could not stop them even then, they resorted to their Honor Killings even instead of controlling and improving themselves to be Sukr’ts.

4. You lose human beings if you act otherwise.

5. You must never forget that the politeness does not mean cowardliness. You must be polite in your behavior, but never a coward.

There are always some persons, everywhere, who can’t differentiate between politeness and cowardice.

Actually, they don’t want to.

Hinduism advocates politeness, not cowardice.
Angad tells  Ravan:
Ram tej bal budhi vipulaai,
Shesh sahas shat sakahin n’ gaai.
Sak sar ek shoshi shat saagar,
Tav bhraatahin poochheun Naynaagar.
Taasu vachan suni saagar paaheen,
Maangat panth, kr’paa man maaheen.’

‘Even hundreds of thousands Shesh can’t describe Ram‘s vigor, capability and vastness of wisdom.
He can dry hundreds of seas with only one arrow.
Yet, he has asked your brother.
Respecting his advice, he is asking a way from sea. He has kindness in his heart.’
Shri Ramcharit Manas: 5 Sundarkand 55|1-3

This incidence is very important to learn how we should behave, according to Hinduism.
We should not lack vigor.
It’s one thing to use our vigor unjustifiably, it’s quite another thing we lack vigor, at all.
Our Lord Ram, did not lack vigor, yet he never used it unjustifiably.
He was not incapable.
His capability was almost unlimited.
Yet, he never used his capability for anything unjustified.
He was not a fool.
The vastness of his wisdom can be seen analyzing every decision he took in his life.

Yet, he never used his wisdom to exert and impose even his decisions on others.
He always encouraged every person, who came into his contact, to express his views if he/she had a difference of opinion.
He even acted on their advices, REJECTING HIS OWN PERSONAL OPINION.
This is why he is called MARYADA PURUSHOTTAM.

But, even then, is this politeness  indefinite?
Certainly not.
Even this very incidence makes it quite clear:

‘Vinay’ n’ maanat jaladhi jad, gaye teen din beeti,
Bole Ram sakop tab, bhay’ binu hoi n’ preeti.’
‘Three days have passed. Foolish sea did not grant the request.
Lord Ram, then, quite angry, said:’There won’t be love until it isn’t afraid.’

Lachhman baan sharaasan aanoo,
Sokhaun vaaridhi vishish Kr’shaanoo.’

Laxman! bring the arrow and the bow.
with a special arrow, I’ll dry the sea.’

‘Shath san vinay’, kutil san preetee,
Sahaj kr’pan’ san sundar neetee.
Mamtaarat san gyaan kahaanee,
Ati lobhee san virati bakhaanee.
Krodhihi sham, kaamihi Hari kathaa,
Oosar beej bhaye phal yathaa.
As kahi Raghupati chaap chadhaavaa,
Yah mat Lachhiman ke man bhaavaa.’

‘Request to a wicked, Love with a wicked diplomat schemer,
Nice policy with a vowed mean,
Describing ultimate truth to an obsessed selfish,
Peace to an angry person, and the divine history of Param Purush to a sex obsessed one;
All these things are as if sowing seeds into an unfertile land.’
Speaking thus, Lord Ram became ready to throw the arrow.
Laxman appreciated this policy.’
Shri Ramcharit Manas: 5 Sundar kand: 1-5.

The lessons to learn from this incidence are:

1. Our first approach must not be aggressive, however powerful we are.

The principle involved here is:

Dushmanī jamkar karo, lékin yé gunjāish rahé,

Gar kabhī hum dost ban jāyén, to sharmindah na hon.’

‘Do enmity at your highest, but keep the place even then, that if we become friends ever, we should not be ashamed of us.’

2. We should wait for a reasonable time to let our request to be granted.
3.We should NEVER wait indefinitely.

We must always be the men of action, never the men of pretexts:

Kurvannév karmāñi jijīvishéchchhatagvong samāh,

Évam tvayi nānýthéto’sti n’ karm lipyaté naré.’

‘Doing Karm only, here, one should wish

to live hundreds of years.

Only this is the way for thee, none else;

So Karm cleaveth not to man.’

Ved: 2 Yajurvéd: 40|2

Karmañyévādhikārasté mā phaléshu kadāchan,

Mā karmphalhéturbhūrmā té sango’stvakarmañi.’

‘Only in work is your right, never in results.

Don’t be result-obsessed, neither your obsession ever be in worklessness.’

Shrīmad Bhagvad Gītā: 2|47

4. If all the possibilities of peace are exhausted, we should NEVER surrender to wickedness.

5. WE MUST attack it.

It  was the policy till we flourished.
Unfortunately, there emerged some impractical persons who did not know anything of human psychology.
They advocated indefinite politeness that was never taught by Hinduism.
All the cowards praised them.
Unfortunately, cowards are always more everywhere than the brave ones.
Cowardice does not require anything to be done.
Bravery does.
So, every person who does not want to work, always supports cowardice in the disguise that they are supporting PEACE.
No, they are certainly not.
They are supporting future slavery of the entire society to the wicked.

It’s what happened with Hindus once.
If they again want to let it happen, I’ve nothing to say.
You are free to take your own decisions.

In my opinion terrorism should be fought against, if you are really a Hindu/human being.

Moreover, a coward can’t achieve anything.

S/he can’t respect him/her self.

And a person who doesn’t respect him/her self, never gets any respect from the others too.

It’s a fact, whether you like it or not, that only the persons having self respect, get respect from the others, none else.

6. Our support and bounty are always with you holy fighters.

Never forget it’s a movement planned, projected and instigated by Ourself.

R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 11| Mantr 7

——————————————————————–———————–

1. More Commentary on Ved

2. More On Hinduism

3. On Islam

4. On History

5. Science Fiction

6.  Creative Adult Sex in English from Durgesh

7. Durgesh in Hindi/Urdu

—————————————————————————————

More commentary on Ved from DSM Satyarthi:

1. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

2. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 1| Mantr 2

3. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 5| Mantr 3

4. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 5| Mantr 3

5. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 7| Mantr 5

6. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 7| Mantr 8

4. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 1

5. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 2

6. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 3

7. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 4

8. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 5

9. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 6

10. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 7

11. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 8

12.R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 9

13. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 58| Mantr 6

14. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 164| Mantr 20

15. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 164| Mantr 46

16. R’gved: Mandal 2| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

17 R’gved: Mandal 3| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

18. R’gved: Mandal 3| Sookt 6| Mantr 2

19. R’gved: Mandal 4| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

20. R’gved: Mandal 5| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

21. R’gved: Mandal 6| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

22. R’gved: Mandal 7| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

23. R’gved: Mandal 8| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

24. R’gved: Mandal 9| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

25. R’gved: Mandal 9| Sookt 63| Mantr 4-5

26. R’gved: Mandal 10| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

27. R’gved: Mandal 10| Sookt 85| Mantr 42

28. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 1| Mantr 1

29. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 1| Mantr 2

30. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 1| Mantr 3

31. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 1| Mantr 4

32. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 11| Mantr 1

33. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 13| Mantr 4

34. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 23| Mantr 3

35. Saamved: Mantr 1

36. Sāmved: Mantr 115

37. Sāmved: Mantr 641: Mahānāmnyārchik| 1

38. Sāmved: Mantr 650: Mahānāmnyārchik| 10

39. Sāmved: Mantr 651: Uttarārchik

40. Atharv Ved: Kaand 1| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

41.  Atharv Ved: Kānd 3| Sookt 30| Mantr 3

42. Atharv Ved: Kānd 3| Sookt 30| Mantr 4

43. Atharv Ved: Kānd 3| Sookt 30| Mantr 6

44. Atharv Ved: Kānd 4| Sookt 4| Mantr 6

45. Atharv Ved: Kānd 4| Sookt 4| Mantr 7

46. Atharv Ved: Kānd 4| Sookt 4| Mantr 8

47. Atharv Ved: Kaand 8| Sookt 1| Mantr 6

48. Atharv Ved: Kaand 14| Sookt 1| Mantr 22

49.Atharv Ved: Kaand 14| Sookt 2| Mantr 25

———————————————————————————–———–

More on Ved from DSM Satyarthi:

1. ‘According to facts’: ‘Yaathaatathyatah’

2. According to Hinduism: We must be polite, not coward

3. Aheism can’t win Hinduism/Ved

4. Casteism is NOT an intgral part of Hinduism:’Samaanee prapaa sah vonnabhaagah’ ”Same drinking same share of food.’

5. Hinduism builds its society on SUKR’TS/Noble doers:’Imaam naareem Sukr’te dadhaat’

6. Hinduism is PRINCIPLES BASED , not PERSON BASED

7. One should not wish to die: Ved hates death

8. RELIGIOUS DEMOCRACY in Hinduism: Ekam sadvipra bahudhaa vadanti

9. Sanyas is not the goal of Hinduism

10. Sati tradition was an Aasur Tradition, not Vedic at all

—————————————————————————————-

Ved: 1 R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 7| Mantr 5

Ved: 1 R’gved:

Mandal 1|

Sookt 7| Mantr 5

DSM Satyarthi

———————————————————————————–——————-

Indram vayam mahādhan indramarbhé havāmahé,

yujam vr’tréshu vajriñam.

—————————————————————————

1We call the controller of organs for the great wealth2, the controller of organs for the small3, the united one4, Vajrin5 in the Vr’trs6.

—————————————————————————-

1. R’shi: Madhuchchhandā Mahimvat Vaishvāmitr.

Sookt 1 to 10 are revealed on Vedarshi Bhagvān Madhuchchhandā Mahimvat Vaishvāmitr.

He confirmed that these 10 Sookts were not written by Vedarshi Bhagvān Lord Agni:

‘AgnérR’gvedo Vāyoh Yajurvedah Sūryāt Sāmvedah’ iti Shatpath Brāhmañé.

Dévtā/Divine Subject: Indr, the controller of organs.

Most of the Ved is devoted to this Mantr Dévtā/Divine Subject.

The second subject Ved guides in most, is Agni, the person that  leads everyone to light, not to darkness ever: ‘Tamso ma jyotirgamay’.

Neither, a person should be immune to the society surrounding him/her.

One can’t be a Sukr’t if he/she is immune to it.

Only a fool can think that the society surrounding him/her does not affect him/her, his/her children, and his/her family.

How can it be  a smart policy,then,  to be immune to something that affects you, your children and your family, whether you like it or not?

Don’t you want to be a smart person?

Don’t you love yourself, your spouse(s), your children and your family at all?

And if you do, how can you be immune to something that affects the life of the person/persons you love?

You have to interfere, because that something is interfering the life of someone you love, whether you like it or not.

It’s a great mistake to think one should be immune to the society surrounding him/her.

The Westerners are already suffering from the irretrievable results of this mistake.

Actually, this erroneous and suicidal view is imposed on the society by the corrupt politicians.

They can’t afford ever an awake and conscious society.

Therefore, they and their paid persons always try to preach the people, under this or that pretext to keep to themselves carefully.

They try to confine them always to themselves.

They can never afford a properly awake, conscious, constantly progressive society.

It’s always dangerous to their own vested vile interests.

It’s obvious, therefore, to be awake, aware and conscious always against these corrupt politicians, to protect your own and your children’s interests.

Chhand/Meter: Gāyatrī

2. Heaven.

3. Physical/material wealth

4. with your woman.

Yujam’ in original text.

Actually ‘Yujam’ in Vedic Sanskr’t contains more meaning than even united with women.

It contains the meaning to be united oneself too.

Without Trishapt everyone is actually not united in him/her self.

This Vedmantr actually tells the same thing what ‘Pātanjal Yogdarshanam’ does when it says:

Yogashchittvr’ttinirodhah.’

‘Yog is the motionlessness of the waves of chitt.’

1 Samādhipād| 2

Tadā dr’shŧuh svarūpé avasthānam.’

“Then synchronization of the viewer in his/her personal identity.’

1 Samādhipād| 3

Vr’ttisārūpyam itaratr.’

‘Synchronization with the wave otherwise.’

1 Samādhipād| 4

A person’s personality and identity is always diverse if Trishapt is not practiced.

Only the practice of Trishapt collects all the diverse parts of one’s personality and identity and unites into a strong one.

It’s the reason why a practitioner of Trishapt always wins on the non practitioners.

The non practitioners have diverse personalities and identities.

They act according to one of them, when one of them is prevalent.

When the other part of one’s personality/identity becomes prevalent, one switches over to it and acts accordingly, different from the first.

A non practitioner’s efforts are, consequently, always diversified, wasting his/her precious time always, in useless diversified acts.

A Trishapt practitioner, however, becomes united in personality/identity.

His/her efforts are consequently united and almost always produce the wanted results.

5. The one who uses his manhood to sanctify the human society.

Hinduism is ever persistent that sex is, and must be ever, an utmost responsible action.

Pavmān Som is the one who has sex for consecration, not for animal desires or children.

Hinduism/Ved does not support the view that one should marry for sex or children.

Both the concepts are erroneous and not good for human society.

Hinduism does not believe that human beings are only social animals.

Of course, it believes in the principle that when born, the infants are not better than animals:

Vitishŧhantām māturasyā upasthānnānāroopā pashavo jāýmānāh.

Sumangalyup sīdémamagnim. sampatnī, pratibhhoshéh dévān.’

Let there come forth from the genital organ of this mother, animals of various forms, being born.

Well doing woman, sit by the man leading to light. Proper wife, ornamentize here the divine ones.’

Ved: 4 Atharv Ved: 14| 2| 25

Yet, it does classify the infants in two classes:

1. ‘Pratibhhoshéh dévān’ ‘the divine ones.’

2. The ordinary human infants who don’t show any inclination towards divinity whatsoever.

The first type of children is entrusted to their mothers, whether the mothers are the followers of Ved or not.

Even Kaikasī could not convert Vibhīshañ to Rāxasism.

This type of infants, therefore, can be safely entrusted to even such mothers.

Islamic policy in this subject differs with Hinduism altogether.

It says:

V’ lā tankiħū almusharikāti ħattā yu’minn.’

‘Don’t marry almusharikāti until they bring Īmān.’

— Al Qur’an Al Majīd: 2 Al Baqara| 221

Al Qur’an Al Majīd allowedNikāħ-e-Kitābiyah’:

Alyaum uħill lakumuttayyibātu v’ t’åāmullazīn ūtulkitāb ħillallakum v’ t’åāmukum ħillallahum valmuħsanātu minal Mu’mināti valmuħsanātu minallazīn ūtulkitāb min qablikum izā ātaitumūhunn ujūrahunn  muħsinīn ghair musāfiħīn v’ lā muttakħizī akħdānin.’

This day are all good things made lawful for you. The food of those who have received the Scripture is lawful for you, and your food is lawful for them. And so are the virtuous women of the believers and the virtuous women of those who received the Scripture before you, when ye give them their marriage portions and live with them in honor, not in fornication, nor taking them as secret concubines.’

Al Qur’an Al Majīd: 5 Al Māedah|5

But practically, some Saħābīs stopped it too, after watching the impracticality of ‘Nikāħ-e-Kitābiyah’ for Musalmeen.

Even Maulānah Saiyad Abul Åālā Maudūdī writes:

‘No doubt, it is a big fitnah, chaos.

In India, Egypt, Syria etc. countries it affected only to the extent, that the Ma’ams, entering the Islamic social system, shattered the Islamic culture vastly.

But in Turkey, its political results too, have been proved dangerous.

This is one of the important reasons that destroyed the vast Sultanate of Turks.

Due to it, if some sympathetic Musalmeen feel the need of its abolition, it’s absolutely proper.’

—‘Nikāħ-e-Kitābiyah’: Tafahīmāt 2: Markazī maktabah Islamī, Delhi edition, January 1981 pp. 314. Translation from original Urdu: DSM Satyarthi

These are the two approaches, two great religions, Hinduism and Islam adopt in this matter.

Of course, Hinduism itself has gone through these bitter experiences several times in its longest history right from the beginning.

Yet, it never surrenders to the evil to the extent, not to take the responsibilities of even the women not accepting Vedic system of life.

It always accepted the challenge.

It never ran away from its responsibilities.

It reasons, if a bad woman too, can’t find shelter in a system claiming to be structured by Eishān Param Brahm Paramātmā Himself, why Eishān Param Brahm Paramātmā made her ab initio.

Did Eishān Param Brahm Paramātmā not know she would be a bad woman?

Isn’t He All-knowing?

However, even in Hinduism, as soon as she is a mother, a woman is required to change her heretofore-irresponsible attitude, and act welldoer, ‘Sumangalī’ .

Remember, she is required to change her attitude, Sumangalī, not her religion, as it is required in Islamic system of life.

Her religion is never attacked in Hinduism, whatsoever it may be.

It maybe discussed with her peacefully, if she consents to it.

If she does not consent to discuss it, it can’t even be discussed with her against her will.

In Hinduism, religion is always a matter of rationality.

Even in Islam too, there is no compulsion in religion.

لَا إِكْرَاهَ فِي الدِّينِ ۖ قَد تَّبَيَّنَ الرُّشْدُ مِنَ الْغَيِّ ۚ فَمَن يَكْفُرْ بِالطَّاغُوتِ وَيُؤْمِن بِاللَّهِ فَقَدِ اسْتَمْسَكَ بِالْعُرْوَةِ الْوُثْقَىٰ لَا

انفِصَامَ لَهَا ۗ وَاللَّهُ سَمِيعٌ عَلِيمٌ

La ikraha fiddeeni qad tabayyana alrrushdu min’ alghayyi faman yakfur bialttaghooti wayumin biAllahi faqadi istamsaka bialAAurwati alwuthqa la infisama laha waAllahu sameeAAun AAaleemun.

There is no compulsion in religion. The right direction is henceforth distinct from error. And he who rejecteth false deities and believeth in Allah hath grasped a firm handhold which will never break. Allah is Hearer, Knower.’

–Al Qur’an Al Kareem: 2 Al Baqarah: 256

Yet, Islam insists on Virtuous women, valmuħsanātu, only:

Alyaum uħill lakumuttayyibātu v’ t’åāmullazīn ūtulkitāb ħillallakum v’ t’åāmukum ħillallahum valmuħsanātu minal Mu’mināti valmuħsanātu minallazīn ūtulkitāb min qablikum izā ātaitumūhunn ujūrahunn  muħsinīn ghair musāfiħīn v’ lā muttakħizī akħdānin.’

This day are all good things made lawful for you. The food of those who have received the Scripture is lawful for you, and your food is lawful for them. And so are the virtuous women of the believers and the virtuous women of those who received the Scripture before you, when ye give them their marriage portions and live with them in honor, not in fornication, nor taking them as secret concubines.’

Al Qur’an Al Majīd: 5 Al Māedah|5

Hinduism orders:

Imām nārīm Sukr’te dadhāt’

without any condition whatsoever.

It orders every woman must have a Sukr’t husband whether she is herself virtuous or not.

Her reformation is also entrusted in Hinduism with the Sukr’t husband.

It’s his duty to reform her peacefully and with all her willingness.

Only because she is a woman, she must have a Sukr’t husband whether she is herself virtuous or not.

This is the sex for consecration Hinduism insists on so aggressively that it orders:

‘Ap raxo hanāth’ even.

It does not compromise in the matter ever.

That’s why Lord Kr’shñ even fought with Rukmiñī’s relations and the persons who helped them.

The second type of infants is ordered to be watched, with close scrutiny, by the Sukr’t father himself.

However, both types of children are instructed to follow the Sukr’t father only, not the mother.

She must be cared for not to be disheartened, however:

Anuvratah pituh putro, mātrā bhavatu sammanāh.

Jāyā patyé madhumatīm vācham vadatu shantivām.’

Ved: 4 Atharv Ved: 3| 30| 2, Paippalād Samhitā: 5| 19| 2

Moreover, if the sex is for sex only, i.e. for Animal Pleasure, or for children, the human beings are not any different from animals.

The animals also do the same.

One can’t fight, rationally and effectively, against Niyog or incest if we accept such a concept.

Only the concept that the sex must be for the consecration of the human society can cure both these evil social diseases.

6. The evil doers who don’t believe in non-violence ever.

Remember, Ved  is not talking here, of the non-violence of Gandhi that was gross injustice with Hindus and the gross appeasement of the wicked Musalmeen.

Gandhi never preferred the nobles of the Musalmeen.

Whenever he was advised to prefer the nobles of the Musalmeen, he always remembered the incident in South Africa when he was beaten by the wicked Musalmeen to the extent that he was afraid of them to the bones, for the entire rest of his life.

Gandhi experimented his non-violence on the cost of innocent Hindus.

Yet he never sacrificed his wicked Musalmeen appeasement even for doing justice with Hindus.

Due to his grossly unjustified wrong policies the wickedness flourished and nobility suffered, more and more.

Hinduism/Ved is proposing a greater policy.

No injustice at all with anyone, punishment to the wicked ones and prosperity for the noble persons whether they are Hindus or Musalmeen.

Ved does not  discriminate the persons in creeds, as Gandhi erroneously did.

Ved discriminate the persons in deeds:

‘Imaam naareem Sukr’te dadhaat’.

Discrimination in creeds is communalism, not secularism.

No matter how much it is advertised for wicked political gains.

While, discrimination in deeds is an aggressive journey of the brave ones, marching bravely to the infinite divinity.

R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 7| Mantr 8

——————————————————————–———————–

More commentary on Ved from DSM Satyarthi:

1. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

2. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 1| Mantr 2

3. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 5| Mantr 3

5. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 7| Mantr 5

6. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 7| Mantr 8

4. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 1

5. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 2

6. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 3

7. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 4

8. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 5

9. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 6

10. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 7

11. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 8

12.R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 9

13. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 58| Mantr 6

14. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 164| Mantr 20

15. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 164| Mantr 46

16. R’gved: Mandal 2| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

17 R’gved: Mandal 3| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

18. R’gved: Mandal 3| Sookt 6| Mantr 2

19. R’gved: Mandal 4| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

20. R’gved: Mandal 5| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

21. R’gved: Mandal 6| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

22. R’gved: Mandal 7| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

23. R’gved: Mandal 8| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

24. R’gved: Mandal 9| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

25. R’gved: Mandal 9| Sookt 63| Mantr 4-5

26. R’gved: Mandal 10| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

27. R’gved: Mandal 10| Sookt 85| Mantr 42

28. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 1| Mantr 1

29. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 1| Mantr 2

30. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 1| Mantr 3

31. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 1| Mantr 4

32. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 11| Mantr 1

33. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 13| Mantr 4

34. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 23| Mantr 3

35. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 40| Mantr8

36. Saamved: Mantr 1

37. Sāmved: Mantr 115

38. Sāmved: Mantr 641: Mahānāmnyārchik| 1

39. Sāmved: Mantr 650: Mahānāmnyārchik| 10

40. Sāmved: Mantr 651: Uttarārchik

41. Atharv Ved: Kaand 1| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

42.  Atharv Ved: Kānd 3| Sookt 30| Mantr 3

43. Atharv Ved: Kānd 3| Sookt 30| Mantr 4

44. Atharv Ved: Kānd 3| Sookt 30| Mantr 6

45. Atharv Ved: Kānd 4| Sookt 4| Mantr 6

46. Atharv Ved: Kānd 4| Sookt 4| Mantr 7

47. Atharv Ved: Kānd 4| Sookt 4| Mantr 8

48. Atharv Ved: Kaand 8| Sookt 1| Mantr 6

49. Atharv Ved: Kaand 14| Sookt 1| Mantr 22

50.Atharv Ved: Kaand 14| Sookt 2| Mantr 25

———————————————————————————–———–

More on Ved from DSM Satyarthi:

1. ‘According to facts’: ‘Yaathaatathyatah’

2. According to Hinduism: We must be polite, not coward

3. Aheism can’t win Hinduism/Ved

4. Casteism is NOT an intgral part of Hinduism:’Samaanee prapaa sah vonnabhaagah’ ”Same drinking same share of food.’

5. Hinduism builds its society on SUKR’TS/Noble doers:’Imaam naareem Sukr’te dadhaat’

6. Hinduism is PRINCIPLES BASED , not PERSON BASED

7. One should not wish to die: Ved hates death

8. RELIGIOUS DEMOCRACY in Hinduism: Ekam sadvipra bahudhaa vadanti

9. Sanyas is not the goal of Hinduism

10. Sati tradition was an Aasur Tradition, not Vedic at all