Hinduism shines 2: To anti Hindus about Lord Ram

Hinduism shines

DSM Satyarthi

Chapter 1

Chapter 2

To anti Hindus about Lord Ram

I’ve already answered the matter in ‘Hinduism strikes back-1‘.

Yet, as it’s being repeated by the hate mongers, I discuss it here again:

Alex 123 writes:
‘LORD RAMA’S MOM (& CO-MOMS) HAVE SEX WITH A DEAD HORSE (ASVAMEDHA SACRIFICE)
The Asvamedha yajna was a celebrated sacrifice in which many ancient Hindu queens & ksatriya women in various provinces had sex with a dead horse, and Lord Rama’s mom (Kausalya) & co-mom’s were no exception. Lord Rama’s mom spends a whole night having sex with a dead horse for the purpose of ‘righteousness & cleansing of sins’:

“The prescribed victims — snakes, birds, the horse, and aquatic animals — were bound at the place of immolation; each was dedicated to a specific divinity as is set forth in the ritual texts. The priests then bound them all to the posts in the manner set forth in the ritual texts. Three hundred beasts in addition to Dasaratha’s jewel of a horse were bound there to the sacrificial posts. Kausalya (Rama’s mom) walked reverently all around the horse and then with the greatest joy cut it with three knives. Her mind unwavering in her desire for righteousness, Kausalya (Rama’s mom) passed one night with the horse. The priests — the hotr, the adhvaryu, and the udgatr — saw to it that the second and the juniormost of the king’s wives, as well as his chief queen, were united with the horse. Then the officiating priest, who was extremely adept and held his senses in check, removed the fat of the horse and cooked it in the manner prescribed in the ritual texts. At the proper time and in accordance with the ritual prescriptions, the lord of men then sniffed the fragrance of the smoking fat, thereby freeing himself from sin. Then, acting in unison, the sixteen brahman officiating priests threw the limbs of the horse into the fire, in accordance with the ritual injunctions. In other sacrifices, the oblation is offered upon branches of the plaksa tree, but in the Horse Sacrifice alone the apportionment of the victim is made on a bed of reeds. The Horse Sacrifice is known as the Three-Day Rite; for both the kalpasutra and the brahmanas refer to the Horse Sacrifice as a rite lasting for three days.” — Ramayana 1:13:24-33.’

This nonsense is being repeated by every hate monger Muslim.
They copy it from somewhere and paste.
It gives them animal satisfaction that their religion is better.
Is it really religion at all?
Whether the actions of a person/persons can be religion for others?
For Muslims:YES.
For Hindus: NO:
Hinduism builds its society, not on beliefs, or sex, as Islam does.

Hinduism builds its society on WISDOM AND FACTS.
As Islam is based on Kalmae Tayyaba:’La ilah illillah, Muhammadarrasoolallah; Hinduism is based on Gayatri Mantr:
‘Bhoorbhuvah svah!
tatsaviturvarenyam, Bhargo devasy’ dheemahi,
DHIYO YO NAH PRACHODAYAT.’
‘(Vow:)The Existence. The Consciousness. The Bliss.We meditate on the Creator of all, Worthy to be chosen, the Pure, the Divine, Who guide our WISDOM.’
-Ved: 2 Yajurved: Chapter 36/3, Maitraayan’ee Samhita: 1/6/41, 8/18;34;37,41; 3/4/10; Shatpath Brahman’: 3/2/2/6
In Hinduism, this Mantr is called MoolMantr, Mahamantr, Mantrraj, etc.

The main difference between these two basic themes of these two great religions, is:
Kalmae Tayyaba mentions a person.
Gayatri Mantr does not.
It mentions Eishan Parambrham Paramatma only.
Thus Islam is basically a person oriented religion, while Hinduism is basically immune to any person whosoever.
It is based on PRINCIPLES, not on any person whosoever.

The hate monger has given the reference:

Ramayana 1:13:24-33

Let’s get them in original.

tathaa kekaya raajaanam vR^iddham parama dhaarmikam |
shvashuram raaja si.mhasya saputram tvam iha aanaya
|| 1-13-24

24.tathaa likewise; vR^iddham parama dhaarmikam= elderly one, very, virtuous one; shvashuram= father-in-law; raaja simhasya= of king, the lion’s [Dasharatha’s]; kekaya raajaanam= Kekaya’s king; sa putram tvam iha aanaya= along with his sons, you, here, invited.

Likewise, King of Kekaya, an elderly, very virtuous, and also the father-in-law of our Lion-King Dasharatha, you personally invite him along with his sons. [1-13-24]

Here, Father of Kaikeyi, is to be invited. Nothing else.
Now, 25th verse:
a~Ngeshvaram maheSvaasam romapaadam su satkR’itam |
vayasyam raaja si.mhasya saputram tam iha aanaya
|| 1-13-25

25. anga iiswaram= Anga kingdom’s, lord; maha iSvaasam= great bow, user of; raaja simhasya= king, the Lion [Dasharatha]; vayasyam= friend of; yashashvinam= illustrious one; romapaadam su satkritam= Romapada, well, honoured, sam aanaya= well, be invited.

Romapada, the lord of Anga kingdom and the user of great bow, let that illustrious one be invited well honoured, for he is the friend of our lion-king Dasharatha.’
-Aarsh Ramayan: 1 Baal Kaand:| Sarg/Chapter13|25

No such nonsense here too.

Let’s scrutinize the 26th Verse now:

tathaa kosala raajaanam bhaanuma.ntam susatkR^itam |
magadha adhipatim shuuram sarva shaastra vishaaradam
|| 1-13-26

26. tathaa kosala raajaanam= like that, Kosala’s, king; bhaanumantam= Bhanumanta; susatkR^itam= well honoured; magadha adhipatim= Magadha, king; shuuram= brave one; sarva shaastra vishaaradam= in all scriptures, profound.

Like that King of Kosala namely Bhanumanta, and the King of Magadha, a brave one and a profound one in all scriptural knowledge, let them be honoured well and be invited. [1-13-26]

No such nonsense, as claimed here again.

Let’s scrutinize the 27th Verse now:

praaptij~nam paramodaaram susatkR^itam puruSarSabham |
raaj~naH shaasanam aadaaya chodayasva nR^iparSabhaan |
praaciinaan sindhu sauviiraan sauraaSThreyaam ca paarthivaan
|| 1-13-27

27. praaptij~nam= Praaptijna, the king of Magadha; parama udaaram= kind-hearted one; susatkR^itam= well honoured; puruSarSabham= king, the best; raaj~naH shaasanam aadaaya= king’s, orders, taking; chodayasva= motivated by it; nR^iparSabhaan= kings, the best; praaciinaan= eastern regional kings; sindhu sauviiraan sauraaSThreyaam ca paarthivaan= Sindhu, Sauviira, Sauraastra, also, kings of.

And Praaptijna, the king of Magadha, the kind-hearted and best one among kings, be well honoured and invited. Further, taking the orders of King Dasharatha and motivated by those orders, the kings of Sindhu, Sauviira and Sauraastra kingdoms may also be invited. [1-13-27]

Once again, no such alleged nonsense.
We come to 28th verse and 29th now:

daakSiNaatyaan narendraam ca samastaan aanayasva ha |
santi snigdhaaH ca ye ca anye raajaanaH pR^ithivii tale,
taan aanaya yathaa kSipram sa anugaan saha baandhavaan.
etaan duutaiH mahaabhaagaiH aanayasva nR’ipa aaj~nyaa
.

28, 29. daakSiNaatyaan narendraam ca= southern kingdoms’, kings, also; samastaan aanayasva ha= all of them, be invited, verily; santi snigdhaaH cha ye cha anye= should there be, friends, other, those, also, other; raajaanaH pridhvii tale= kings, on earth’s, surface; taan aanaya yathaa kshipram= them, be invited, as early as; sa anugaan saha baandhavaan= along with, followers, along with, their relatives; etaan mahaabhaagaiH duutaiH= them, highly illustrious ones, through envoys; aanayasva nR^ipa aaj~nyaa= invite them, by king’s, orders.

All of the kings of southern kingdoms be invited, and should there be any other friends and other friendly kings on the surface of the earth, they too shall be invited as early as possible with all their followers, relatives through highly illustrious envoys, of course

with the orders of our king.” Thus Sage Vashishta said to minister Sumantr’!
-Aarsh Ramayan: 1 Baal Kaand:| Sarg/Chapter13|28-29

Once again, no such alleged nonsense.

Everyone must pay attention to it.

Now, the 30th Verse:

vasiSTha vaakyam tat shrutvaa suma.ntraH tvaritaH tadaa |
vyaadishat puruSaan tatra raaj~naam aanayane shubhaan
|| 1-13-30

30. tat vashiSTa vaakyam shrutvaa= that, Sage Vashishta’s, words, on hearing; tadaa sumantraH tvaritaH= then, Sumantra, expeditiously; raajnanam tatra aanayane= kings, there [to their kingdom,] for inviting; shubhaan puruSaan vyaadishat= devout men � envoys, men, ordered.

On hearing that word of Vashishta, Sumantra expeditiously ordered devout envoys to invite all those kings to their kingdom. [1-13-30]

What a tragedy for the hate monger!

No such nonsense anywhere!

The 31st Verse is:

svayam eva hi dharmaatmaa prayaato muni shaasanaat |
suma.ntraH tvarito bhuutvaa samaanetum mahaamatiH
|| 1-13-31

31. dharmaatmaa sumantraH= virtuous one, Sumantra; muni shaashanaat= by sage’s, orders; twaritaH bhuutva= brisk, on becoming; samaanetum mahii kshitaH= to fetch, earth’s, rulers; svayam eva prayayaataH= personally, thus, journeyed.

That virtuous Sumantra became brisk upon sage’s words and personally journeyed to fetch all the rulers on the earth. [1-13-31]

The 32nd Verse:

te ca karmaantikaaH sarve vasiSThaaya ca maharSaye |
sarvam nivedayanti sma yaj~ne yat upakalpitam
|| 1-13-32

32. te karma antikaaH sarve= those, artisans, all; yaj~ne yat upakalpitam= in ritual, works, that are accomplished; vashiSTyaa, maharSaye= to Vashishta, to the sage; sarvam nivedayanti sma= all details, have, reported.

All those artisans engaged in ritual works have reported Vashishta, the details of all those ritual works that are accomplished. [1-13-32]

Now the last Verse, 33rd Verse the moron mentioned:

tataH priito dvija shreSThaH taan sarvaan munir abraviit |
avaj~nayaa na daatavyam kasya cit liilayaa api vaa || 1-13-33
avaj~nayaa kR^itam hanyaat daataaram na atra sa.mshayaH
|

33, 34a. tataH priitaH dwija shreshtaH muniH= then, satisfied, Brahman, eminent, saint, Sage Vashishta; taan sarvaan abraviit= to, all of them, said; avaj~nayaa na daatavyam= with disrespect, not, to be endowed; kasya chit liilaya api vaa= to anyone, deceptively, also, either; avaj~nayaa kR^itam hanyaat daataaram= with disrespect, done [deeds,] will kill, donor; na atra samshayam= not, there, any doubt.

Then, that satisfied saint and eminent Brahman Vashishta, spoke this way to all of them, “nothing is to be endowed to anyone either with disrespect or deceptively, the deeds done with disrespect will kill the donor and there is no doubt about it.” [1-13-33, 34a]

All the ten verses of the reference, Ramayan: 1 Baal Kaand:13|24-33, are produced here, with original Sanskr’t text.
I reproduce all of them here, translations only now:
Likewise, King of Kekaya, an elderly, very virtuous, and also the father-in-law of our Lion-King Dasharath, you personally invite him along with his sons.
-Aarsh Ramayan: 1 Baal Kaand:| Sarg/Chapter13|24
Romapada, the lord of Anga kingdom and the user of great bow, let that illustrious one be invited well honoured, for he is the friend of our lion-king Dasharath.
-Aarsh Ramayan: 1 Baal Kaand:| Sarg/Chapter13|25
Like that King of Kosal namely Bhanumant, and the King of Magadh, a brave one and a profound one in all scriptural knowledge, let them be honoured well and be invited.’
-Aarsh Ramayan: 1 Baal Kaand:| Sarg/Chapter13|26
And Praaptigy’, the king of Magadh, the kind-hearted and best one among kings, be well honoured and invited.Further, taking the orders of King Dasharath and motivated by those orders, the kings of Sindhu, Sauviir and Sauraastr kingdoms may also be invited.’
-Aarsh Ramayan: 1 Baal Kaand:| Sarg/Chapter13|27
All of the kings of southern kingdoms be invited, and should there be any other friends and other friendly kings on the surface of the earth, they too shall be invited as early as possible with all their followers, relatives through highly illustrious envoys, of course with the orders of our king.” Thus Sage Vashishth said to minister Sumantr’!’
-Aarsh Ramayan: 1 Baal Kaand:| Sarg/Chapter13|28-29
‘On hearing that word of Vashishth, Sumantr expeditiously ordered devout envoys to invite all those kings to their kingdom.’
-Aarsh Ramayan: 1 Baal Kaand:| Sarg/Chapter13|30
‘That virtuous Sumantr became brisk upon sage’s words and personally journeyed to fetch all the rulers

on the earth.’
-Aarsh Ramayan: 1 Baal Kaand:| Sarg/Chapter13|31
‘All those artisans engaged in ritual works have reported Vashishth, the details of all those ritual works that are accomplished.’
-Aarsh Ramayan: 1 Baal Kaand:| Sarg/Chapter13|32
‘Then, that satisfied saint and eminent Brahman Vashishth, spoke this way to all of them, “nothing is to be endowed to anyone either with disrespect or deceptively, the deeds done with disrespect will kill the donor and there is no doubt about it.”
-Aarsh Ramayan: 1 Baal Kaand:| Sarg/Chapter13|33

Now,can the hate monger Alex123 tell the entire Internet Community: What is there in these ten verses that he has written:
”LORD RAMA’S MOM (& CO-MOMS) HAVE SEX WITH A DEAD HORSE (ASVAMEDHA SACRIFICE)
The Asvamedha yajna was a celebrated sacrifice in which many ancient Hindu queens & ksatriya women in various provinces had sex with a dead horse, and Lord Rama’s mom (Kausalya) & co-mom’s were no exception. Lord Rama’s mom spends a whole night having sex with a dead horse for the purpose of ‘righteousness & cleansing of sins’:

“The prescribed victims — snakes, birds, the horse, and aquatic animals — were bound at the place of immolation; each was dedicated to a specific divinity as is set forth in the ritual texts. The priests then bound them all to the posts in the manner set forth in the ritual texts. Three hundred beasts in addition to Dasaratha’s jewel of a horse were bound there to the sacrificial posts. Kausalya (Rama’s mom) walked reverently all around the horse and then with the greatest joy cut it with three knives. Her mind unwavering in her desire for righteousness, Kausalya (Rama’s mom) passed one night with the horse. The priests — the hotr, the adhvaryu, and the udgatr — saw to it that the second and the juniormost of the king’s wives, as well as his chief queen, were united with the horse. Then the officiating priest, who was extremely adept and held his senses in check, removed the fat of the horse and cooked it in the manner prescribed in the ritual texts. At the proper time and in accordance with the ritual prescriptions, the lord of men then sniffed the fragrance of the smoking fat, thereby freeing himself from sin. Then, acting in unison, the sixteen brahman officiating priests threw the limbs of the horse into the fire, in accordance with the ritual injunctions. In other sacrifices, the oblation is offered upon branches of the plaksa tree, but in the Horse Sacrifice alone the apportionment of the victim is made on a bed of reeds. The Horse Sacrifice is known as the Three-Day Rite; for both the kalpasutra and the brahmanas refer to the Horse Sacrifice as a rite lasting for three days.” — Ramayana 1:13:24-33.’

Can he prove his point?
Even his ancestors can’t.
SHAME ON THE DIRTY LIAR!

Where is Lord Ram’s Mom/Co Moms here, even mentioned?Where is any horse, living or dead, mentioned?Where is any sex mentioned?Alex123 is a complete hate monger, dirty liar.Shame!Shame!!

‘Chahat uđāvani phūnki pahāđū.’

They want to blow away the mountain only by blowing air from their mouth to it.

Ridiculous!

They don’t and can’t understand ever why Hinduism is immortal.

Ab initio,right from the beginning of the creations, Hinduism claims that it exists:

‘Naasadaaseeno sadaseettadaaneemnaaseedrajo
no vyomaa paro yat,

kimaavareevah kuh kasy’ sharmannambhah kimaaseedgahanam gabheeram?
N’ Mr’tyuraaseedamr’tam n’ tarhi
n’ raatryaa ahn aaseetpraketah,
aaneedavaatam svadhayaa tadekam
tasmaaddhaany’nn’ parah kinchanaas.’

– Ved: 1R|10| 129 Naasadeey’ Sookt| 1-2.

Dr. Isaac Asimov has translated these two

mantrs:

‘Then was not nonexistent nor existent,
there was no realm of air, no sky beyond it.
What covered in, and where?
And what gave shelter? Was water there,
Unfathomed depth of water?
Death was not then,
nor was there aught immortal:
no sign was there, the day’s and night’s divider.
That One Thing, breathless,
breathed by its own nature:
apart from it was nothing whatsoever’.
– Creations: Isaac Asimov: Harrap London 1984: p.101.

Moreover, he has written an introductory note also:

‘Those people whose education and experience have been sharply limited to their own communities are apt to end with a totally self-contained view of the Universe. Their language is the only language. Why should anyone call a boy a knabe or a garcon, when a boy is manifestly a boy?
Again, people who believe that the Bible is the inspired word of God often believe that the King James Bible, specifically, that is so inspired, and turn away in horror from any attempt to correct or modernize what is after all merely a translation. Or as one aged parishioner said, waving his Bible,‘If the King James was good enough for the prophets and apostles, it is good enough for me.’
Yet there are sophisticated attempts at penetrating the mysteries of creation that are neither scientific nor Judo Christian and here is one of them: a Hindu Attempt.
There are points in it that resemble Genesis1 (chaos and darkness first, and then light), and points that do not (the Universe first and gods next, rather than reverse).
– Creations: Isaac Asimov: Harrap London 1984: p.101.

It faced successfully all the aggressions and attacks on it, whether Raxasism of Ravan that had a slogan of ‘Wayam Raxaamah’ ‘We Protect’; Persianism, Islam, Christianity, Judaism, Communism, atheism and what not .

They converted entire nations elsewhere.
Mind you, not only one nation, NATIONS.
Yet, the same philosophies, the same systems of life, the same religions; marched to India, very aggressively, YET FAILED MISERABLY.

Why is it so?

Even, now the internationally famous, and respected poet, Sir Muhammad Iqbal, when he was an Indian, wrote with a great pride:

‘Kuchh baat hai ki hasti mitti nahin hamari,
dushman raha hai sadiyon, daure jahan hamara.’

What is that ‘baat’?

The humanity of Hinduism, of course!

—————————————————————————————

More on Hinduism from DSM Satyarthi:

1. ‘Bhoorbhuvah svah!’ ‘The Existence! The Consciousness! The Bliss!’

2.‘Devasy’ pashy’ kaavyam, n’ mamaar, n’ jeeryati.’

3. Hinduism shines

4.Ved is the eternal law book having infinite knowledge in it for human beings

5. ‘According to facts’: ‘Yaathaatathyatah’

6. ‘SET THIS WOMAN for WELL DOER’: ‘Imaam naareem Sukr’te dadhaat’

7. The Evernew Hinduism: Yaathaatathyatah: Ved 2|40|8

8. ‘How to cross death’: ‘Tamev viditvaati mr’tyumeti’: Ved2Yajurved|31|18

9. According to Hinduism: We must be polite, not coward

10.Ye yathaa maam prapadyante taanstathaiv bhajaamyaham: Lord Kr’shn

11. ‘Maachchhitthaa asmaallokaat’ ‘Be not severed from this world’: Ved

12. The mental slavery of the English-educated Indians

——————————————————————————————————————–-

More on Islam from DSM Sayarthi:

1. Bal huv qur’anum majeedun fe LAUHIM MAHFOOZIN

2. Innahu laquranun kareemun Fee kitabin maknoonin

3. ‘Hudallilmuttaqeen’: ‘Guidance for controllers of organs’: 2 Al Baqarah: 2

4. ‘Alaa qalbik litakoon minal-munzireen’ ‘upon your heart one of who to warn’

5. Muslimahs! Come to India. I recommend Hindu lovers for all the Muslimahs.: Khadeejah Muhammad

6. Islam according to Qur’an and Maulana Maududi rahamatullh alaihi

7. A Moment of grave thinking for the entire sophisticated Muslim Community

8. ‘SET THIS WOMAN for WELL DOER’: ‘Imaam naareem Sukr’te dadhaat’

9. ‘V’ innahu fe UMMALKITAABI ladainaa la’liyyun hakeemun’: 43/4

10. Most Present day Muslms don’t do what Huzoor(SAW) did:

11. The Muslim beauties are wooing Hindu men FASTEST

12. ‘What really matters in the sight of God’: Maulana: Maududi

13. Why did Islam face a counter revolution at Karbala?

14. Why there are differences among us?

15. No differences Please!

16. Communal Muslims discuss my Muslim wife, me and my Muslim women: Durgesh

———————————————————————

Commentary on Ved from DSM Satyarthi:

1. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

2. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 1| Mantr 2

3. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 5| Mantr 3

4. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 5| Mantr 3

5. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 7| Mantr 5

6. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 7| Mantr 8

4. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 1

5. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 2

6. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 3

7. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 4

8. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 5

9. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 6

10. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 7

11. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 8

12.R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 9

13. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 58| Mantr 6

14. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 164| Mantr 20

15. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 164| Mantr 46

16. R’gved: Mandal 2| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

17 R’gved: Mandal 3| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

18. R’gved: Mandal 3| Sookt 6| Mantr 2

19. R’gved: Mandal 4| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

20. R’gved: Mandal 5| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

21. R’gved: Mandal 6| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

22. R’gved: Mandal 7| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

23. R’gved: Mandal 8| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

24. R’gved: Mandal 9| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

25. R’gved: Mandal 9| Sookt 63| Mantr 4-5

26. R’gved: Mandal 10| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

27. R’gved: Mandal 10| Sookt 85| Mantr 42

28. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 1| Mantr 1

29. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 1| Mantr 2

30. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 1| Mantr 3

31. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 1| Mantr 4

32. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 11| Mantr 1

33. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 13| Mantr 4

34. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 23| Mantr 3

35. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 40| Mantr8

36. Saamved: Mantr 1

37. Sāmved: Mantr 115

38. Sāmved: Mantr 641: Mahānāmnyārchik| 1

39. Sāmved: Mantr 650: Mahānāmnyārchik| 10

40. Sāmved: Mantr 651: Uttarārchik

41. Atharv Ved: Kaand 1| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

42.  Atharv Ved: Kānd 3| Sookt 30| Mantr 3

43. Atharv Ved: Kānd 3| Sookt 30| Mantr 4

44. Atharv Ved: Kānd 3| Sookt 30| Mantr 6

45. Atharv Ved: Kānd 4| Sookt 4| Mantr 6

46. Atharv Ved: Kānd 4| Sookt 4| Mantr 7

47. Atharv Ved: Kānd 4| Sookt 4| Mantr 8

48. Atharv Ved: Kaand 8| Sookt 1| Mantr 6

49. Atharv Ved: Kaand 14| Sookt 1| Mantr 22

50. Atharv Ved: Kaand 14| Sookt 2| Mantr 25

5 comments on “Hinduism shines 2: To anti Hindus about Lord Ram

  1. […] “Bhagvān Rām did not kill Rāvañ actually, he sent him to paradise.” Dr. Ruth Heinerik Marx said with intense feeling. […]

  2. longerh says:

    True, it’s muslims who copy a anonymous comment and post it all over.

  3. […] If men and women were not equal in Ved/Hinduism practically how Brahm Jagdambā Brahm Bhagwatī Sītā Rāvañi Paulastý could have gone to the forests with Lord Rām? […]

  4. […] “So you are determined now that you would make me the ever despised historical Kaikéyī that was Lord Rām’s stepmother?” I looked at her gravely. “Don’t you know me better, Kaikéyī ?” […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s