Should we really ban Islam?

Should we really ban Islam?

DSM Satyarthi

‘Islam is a cult.

It is time to wake up and realize that this cult is a threat to mankind and there can be no co-existence with Muslims.

As long as Muslims believe in Muhammad, they are a threat to others and to themselves.

Muslims must either leave Islam, discard their culture of hate and join the rest of mankind as fellow humans, or non-Muslims must separate themselves from them, ban Islam, end the immigration of Muslims and send home those who plot against democracy and refuse to integrate.’

 

These are the words, word by word, written by Dr. Ali Sina in his most important book, ‘Understanding Muħammad: A Psychobiography of Allah’s prophet’ on page 7.

I won’t go in the useless time consuming discussion whether Dr. Ali Sina is right or Islam.

I want to discuss here about the solutions of Dr. Ali Sina he has proposed to get rid of the problems the entire humanity is facing, due to Islam, in his well-perused opinion.

I promise not to deviate from it, unless it isn’t utmost necessary.

 

Dr. Ali Sina’s solutions are:

Firstly, Muslims must leave Islam, discard their culture of hate and join the rest of mankind as fellow humans.

Isn’t it against Democracy not to let Muslims decide what they themselves must do?

Of course, we can’t, and we shouldn’t ever, let any human society, Muslims or someone else whosoever, to have a culture of hate against any human group whatsoever.

Yet, should we do it by banning that particular society or by teaching and punishing her if she still acts against humanity?

We should never forget, as for as India is concerned, Indian Muslims have contributed to make present Indian society in a very big manner.

They never hated their fellow citizens Hindus as we find in other countries.

If they had, India couldn’t have been a Hindu Majority country still now.

Even the too much-fussed Two Nation Theory of Muħammad Ålī Jinnah could not make entire Musalmīn to leave India and go to Pakistan.

Can anyone say today that Indian Musalmīn don’t love India, instead they love Pakistan more?

Why Dr. Ali Sina’s theory that Islam itself is a culture of hate never worked in India?

 

It isn’t a simple question to be ignored in a general way.

Instead, I claim it’s the utmost important question that must be answered before planning any campaign to abolish Islam herself from everywhere.

 

Why Dr. Ali Sina’s theory that Islam itself is a culture of hate never worked in India?

Islam was always one of the most popular ideologies in India in Hindus even.

The Hindus go to Ajmer Sharīf more, than even the Musalmīn do.

Isn’t it a fact?

Apply Dr. Ali Sina’s theory that Islam itself is a culture of hate and explain this phenomenon in India.

You can’t avoid it.

You can’t ignore it ever.

 

Isn’t it a fact that the first holy war of Independence of India was fought in 1857 under the leadership of the great Mughal Emperor, Bahādur Shah Zafar?

If Hindus were hated by the Musalmīn and had really suffered in their rule, why the hell they wanted to establish Muslim rule against the then East India Company rule?

Why their leader wasn’t some Hindu, instead of Bahādur Shah Zafar?

 

Shouldn’t Dr. Ali Sina and his co authors explain this historical phenomenon in India?

 

Dr. Ali Sina’s second proposed solution to the Pseudo Islamic terrorism is:

Non-Muslims must separate themselves from Muslims, ban Islam, end the immigration of Muslims and send home those who plot against democracy and refuse to integrate.’

It is exactly what was done in Partition of India.

Non Muslims didn’t separate themselves from Muslims, but the Pseudo Musalmīn then themselves separated from then Hindus.

Somewhat the same thing is still being done by present day Pseudo Musalmīn everywhere.

It isn’t even needed now for Non Musalmīn to separate Muslims from them.

The ever stupid Pseudo Musalmīn are already doing it themselves everywhere and deliberately, either clandestinely or openly, conspiring against Non Muslims, plotting terrorist activities against them.

These ever stupid Pseudo Musalmīn are not creative, not productive, neither they want to be ever.

They even don’t understand no human society can survive herself if she isn’t creative and productive.

They only want to kill the Non Muslims so that they themselves can get Jannat.

Does Islam really preach this ever anti-human doctrine?

 

Dr. Ali Sina and his co authors say ‘Yes’.

Yet, the learned persons who have really perused Islam without any bias, say ‘No, Certainly Not’.

Al Qur’an Al Karīm says:

Muħammadurrasūlullāhi.

Wallazīn måhu Ashiddao Ǻlā alkuffāri ruħmāo baynahum.’

Muħammad is the Messenger of Allah.

And those with him are severe against Al Kuffār, Merciful among themselves.’

Al Qur’an Al Karīm : 48 Al Fatħ| 29

Pseudo Musalmīn terrorists and criminal/criminal minded Pseudo Musalmīn have interpreted this āyat-e-Karīmah in their favor that this āyat-e-Karīmah orders them to kill the non Musalmīn.

They go ahead further and quote one more āyat from Al Qur’an Al Karīm to support their vile interests:

Fa qatulū almusharikīn

ħaisu wajadttumūhum.’

 Then kill the associators

wherever you find them.

Al Qur’an Al Kareem: 9 Attawbah|5

 

Well, it’s the interpretation Yazīd MalåūnǺrab

Burdāfaroshs and their supporters Mullahs and Maulavīs allotted to it

They damn cared if this interpretation of this āyat-e-Karīmah is against Al Qur’an Al Kareem itself.*

 

The Pseudo Musalmīn terrorists and criminal/criminal minded Pseudo Musalmīn keep repeating only two āyat-e-karīmahs:

Muħammadurrasūlullāhi.

Wallazīn måhu Ashiddao Ǻlā alkuffāri ruħmāo baynahum.’

Muħammad is the Messenger of Allah.

And those with him are severe against Al Kuffār, Merciful among themselves.’

Al Qur’an Al Karīm : 48 Al Fatħ| 29

 ‘Fa qatulū almusharikīn

ħaisu wajadttumūhum’

Then kill the associators

wherever you find them

 —Al Qur’an Al Kareem: 9 Attawbah|5

They keep repeating these two āyat-e-karīmahs as if the entire Islam is centralized on these two āyat-e-karīmahs.

Is it true?

Anyone who has really perused Islam without any bias, without any prejudice, can tell everyone it isn’t.

Isn’t it a negative approach of these PseudoMusalmīn terrorists and criminal/criminal minded PseudoMusalmīn to their own religion if their claim is taken prima facie?

 

Now, let’s analyze their claim itself.

How many PseudoMusalmīn terrorists and criminal/criminal minded Pseudo Musalmīn are there in the entire Ummat-eMuslimah?

51%?

More?

49%?

Less?

What about the rest of the Musalmīn who aren’t Pseudo Musalmīn terrorists and criminal/criminal minded Pseudo Musalmīn, neither they ever were?

Why should they suffer for something they haven’t done ever?

Because their fellow religionists did it?

Is it justice to them?

 

What the hell we want?

To face their injustice with our own injustice?

Then how the hell are we better than Pseudo Musalmīn terrorists and criminal/criminal minded Pseudo Musalmīn?

Can’t we really teach them humanity?

Can’t even we punish them if they refuse to learn?

The entire humankind can’t do it?

Are the Pseudo Musalmīn terrorists and criminal/criminal minded PseudoMusalmīn so much large in number?

Are they so much capable in resources even?

Isn’t what I propose more justified, more rational, more logical, more practical and more human?

 

Why compel even the Musalmīn that believe in humanity to join these inhuman PseudoMusalmīn terrorists and criminal/criminal minded Pseudo Musalmīn?

 

Isn’t that’s what you are proposing to do?

 

Even if I believe, though I can’t be so insane ever to believe it, what you say:

Every Musalmān is a terrorist or a potential terrorist.’

Isn’t it smarter to break the unity of our common enemy?

If a large number of such Musalmīn claim they aren’t with these wretched animals, the Pseudo Musalmīn terrorists and criminal/criminal minded Pseudo Musalmīn, why shouldn’t we take advantage of it?

Why should we send them too to our enemy’s camp?

To strengthen our enemy’s capability to fight with us more effectively?

Must be us so stupid?

I don’t think so.

I can’t even imagine to think as stupid as it’s being proposed.

———————————————————-

Islam according to Ved

More from DSM Satyarthi:

1. On Islam

2. On History

3.  Commentary on Ved

4. More On Hinduism

5. Science Fiction

6.  Creative Adult Sex in English from Durgesh

7. Durgesh in Hindi/Urdu

5 comments on “Should we really ban Islam?

  1. R Pratap says:

    The author of this blog Ved is absolutely unjustified in saying that Indian Muslims are any different from other Muslim extremists from other parts of the world.

    This assertion of many non-Muslim apologists of Islam is extremely dangerous because, it does allow the next victims of Islam to learn from their own past (and present) and save themselves in time.

    The reason why Muslims could not convert all of Hindus are multifold — none of it is because Indian Muslims are peace loving. After all they have managed to Islamize — and with the utmost brutality — half of the Indian subcontinent (including Afghanistan, Pakistan and large parts of India). Look at what they’ve done to Hindus that were stranded in Pakistan. Look at what they have done in Kashmir.

    Islam has totally destroyed ancient peaceful civilizations wherever it attacked like a deadly virus. Amongst the reason HInduism could survive were:
    – It was further away from the Arab world, and those that were nearer were destroyed first. by the time Islam could finally usurp India, Britishers took over India’s reigns and the Islamic sojourn had to end.

    – Unlike the other peaceful pagan societies that Islam destroyed with ease, Hinduism was more organised, and although a peaceful religion, it expected its adherents to take to arms in order to fight evil. New militant branches of Hinduism — like the Sikh path came into being to protect Hinduism long enough, before the British raj took over.

    -It’s true that not all Muslims are equally violent — but that does not absolve Islam itself, which encourages violence against non-Muslims — and the accepting and receptive nature of the Indian society had influence many Moghul rulers — although, only as short respites. But, these respites did prolong the Islamization of Indian subcontinent, which could not be completed when British came — a fact that Indian Muslims secretly, one day want to compensate for. That is why we see instances of love jihad and such things.

    If the Indian Muslims that were left behind from partition seemed less violent, it was only because they are outnumbered far too much by the Hindus, after most of the Muslims left. But, now, as the Muslim population — through a planned demographic change — increases by leaps and bounds — the Muslim violence is increasing day by day. Most of it is deliberately downplayed and even hidden by the media — and they think they’re doing good to the society by doing this.

  2. R Pratap says:

    (corrected version)

    The author of this blog Ved is absolutely unjustified in saying that Indian Muslims are any different from other Muslim extremists from other parts of the world.

    This assertion of many non-Muslim apologists of Islam is extremely dangerous because, it prevents the next victims of Islam from learning from their own past (and present) and save themselves in time.

    The reason why Muslims could not convert all of Hindus in the Indian subcontinent are multifold — none of it is because Indian Muslims are peace loving. After all they have managed to Islamize — and with the utmost brutality — half of the Indian subcontinent (including Afghanistan, Pakistan and large parts of India). Look at what they’ve done to Hindus that were stranded in Pakistan. Look at what they have done in Kashmir.

    Islam has totally destroyed ancient peaceful civilizations wherever it attacked like a deadly virus. Amongst the reason HInduism could survive were:
    – It was further away from the Arab world, and those that were nearer were destroyed first. by the time Islam could finally usurp India, Britishers took over India’s reigns and the Islamic sojourn had to end.

    – Unlike the other peaceful pagan societies that Islam destroyed with ease, Hinduism was more organised, and although a peaceful religion, it expected its adherents to take to arms in order to fight evil. New militant branches of Hinduism — like the Sikh path came into being to protect Hinduism long enough, before the British raj took over.

    -It’s true that not all Muslims are equally violent — but that does not absolve Islam itself, which encourages violence against non-Muslims — and the accepting and receptive nature of the Indian society had influence many Moghul rulers — although, only as short respites. But, these respites did prolong the Islamization of Indian subcontinent, which could not be completed when British came — a fact that Indian Muslims secretly, one day want to compensate for. That is why we see instances of love jihad and such things.

    If the Indian Muslims that were left behind from partition seemed less violent, it was only because they are outnumbered far too much by the Hindus, after most of the Muslims left. But, now, as the Muslim population — through a planned demographic change — increases by leaps and bounds — the Muslim violence is increasing day by day. Most of it is deliberately downplayed and even hidden by the media — and they think they’re doing good to the society by doing this.

    • Durgesh says:

      Thanks for your views even if we differ.
      I would express my own views in response as soon as possible.
      I definitely admire a serious discussion on the points, if you are really interested.
      Meanwhile I propose to think on the opinion of the honorable Prime Minister of India Narendra Modi, he has expressed in his latest interview on CNN.
      Doesn’t he too agree with me?
      Remember, my article was written long before he was interviewed.
      You can’t say I am influenced from his views.
      It can’t be.

  3. […] husband that always craves to live in a world of one thousand five hundred years ago. Most of the Musalmīn, however much they are educated, almost always tend to that life ultimately, sooner or […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s