Ved: 4 Atharv Ved: Kānd 14| Vivāh Kānd: Sookt 1| Mantr 2

Ved: Ved Bhāshý

4 Atharv Ved

 Kānd 14 Vivāh Kānd:

 Sūkt 1| Mantr 2

DSM Satyarthi

—————————————————————————————————————

1By Som  Ādityās strong2 by Som Earth great3

No doubt4, in the genital organ of these constellations5, Som is established optimum6.

————————————————————————————————–

1.R’shikā: Sūryā Sāvitrī

Dévtā/ Divine Subject: Som

Chhand/Meter: Anushŧup

2. Ved is revealed in a telegraphic language, not in any ordinary language.

This basic fact, about Ved, always must be remembered while studying Ved gravely.

I’m sorry to say that the Westerners never studied Ved gravely.

I’m sorrier to say that the Westerners were never serious not only about Ved.

They were never equally serious about Bible and Qur’an too, as well.

These scriptures were never seriously studied by the Westerners.

If they were ever studied seriously, by the Westerners; the Western Culture, now on the path of its certain suicide, would never were on its suicidal path.

It was an unfortunate tragedy that when Ved, Bible and Qur’an were being studied by the Westerners, the Communism was fighting its own war of survival with religion.

It made the Communist thinkers more biased those days than they are not biased even today.

No biased studies should be taken seriously ever.

Yet, isn’t it a tragedy that, the entirely biased studies of those days, by the Communist thinkers are still being taken seriously?

Isn’t it a time to re-study Ved, Bible, Qur’an and the related literature more seriously, scientifically and absolutely unbiased, for a change?

We have one more benefit the Communist thinkers of those days didn’t have.

The Communism in those days was utopian somewhat, even after the great scientific studies Karl Marx and Frederick Engels did then.

It was not a scientific fact, known those days that, the Multiverse is made of vibrations of energy basically.

This fact, revealed and accepted scientifically afterwards, has changed the entire scenario of scientific studies about the matters the Communist thinkers had done their studies.

Marriage institution is also one of them.

The persons who have studied Western Culture seriously know very well that the Western Culture does not stand on scientific grounds only.

In fact, no culture can ever stand on scientific grounds only howsoever it insists to stand.

Any theory, any fact, when it is brought into practice always succumbs to human emotions prevailing those days.

It has to.

It hasn’t another option if it has to come into practice.

Humans never react scientifically only.

Neither can they ever do it.

Scientific facts are never emotional until they are facts only.

As soon as they are brought into practice they have to deal with the humans.

Humans include both males and females.

Not only females are emotional ones, the males are also not very different in the matter.

No doubt, the females are more emotionals than the males.

Nevertheless, even the males are not devoid of emotions absolutely.

Hence, any scientific fact, however factually it is known to us, when brought into practice, is bound to succumb to the emotional needs of the humans those are bringing it into practice.

That’s why the theory and practice always differ howsoever honest its implementers are.

That’s why even Eīshān Param Brahm Paramātmā has instructed us not to confine ourselves to the principles only i.e. Ved, but  to the very Mission of Life/ExistenceKr’ñvanto VishvamāryamDharm Santānam, Dharm Sansthāpan, as well; to bring the principles into practice and study Divý Itihās, the Divine History for it:

  1. Dhiyo yo nah prachodayāt
  2. Yāthātathyatah

This fact, once realized in its full form, can immensely help us to re-study about marriage institution once opposed by the Communist thinkers so insistently, so persistently.

The Communist thinkers of those days found marriage institution an immensely avoidable obstacle in their pathway to Communism.

They thought marriage institutions give birth to Private Property.

The Communist thinkers were right.

But they were not right in thinking that the family was the only institution that caused the accumulation of Private Property.

Moreover, owing to immense drastic failure of communist economic, social and political system around the entire globe, we have to think more gravely now do we really need to oppose private property anymore.

Aren’t the financial scams, not done by the advocates of Private Property, more serious, more dangerous and more destructive to the humanity and Democracy than the Private Property itself is?

We should never forget that the destruction of Private Property absolutely, leads to destroy the family itself.

Frederick Engels has already written in the subject as much as we don’t need any analysis more to understand the subject comprehensively.

We need Private Property to protect and safeguard a family.

We have no other option to it.

Consequently, why not support Welfare Capitalism and State Capitalism instead of opposing Private Property?

We have experienced bitterly that our industries can’t survive in so-called Communism.

Moreover, we have experienced bitterly too that Communism has led to a totalitarianism called Stalinism now.

We need industries to go ahead.

In fact, we need industries to march ahead.

The Welfare Capitalism and State Capitalism are more suitable for it then the so-called Communism or the ‘Socialism’ prone to nonstop Scams.

Shouldn’t we think over it more gravely now?

Today, we can easily observe around us that even the singles have Private Property.

Moreover, to be more exactly honest and sincere, the entire history of humankind has proven now that the singles crave for Private Property even more than the married persons do.

Why is it so?

Because the married persons have their family to take care of them in their old age, while the singles don’t.

They have only their money to take care of them in their old age.

It is the reason why the singles are found more corrupt than the married persons in accumulating Private Property and wealth.

That’s why Hinduism does not support single life, except only when a single can’t afford even a single wife.

It specifically orders:

S’ nah pitév sūnavé’gné sūpāyano bhav,

Sachasvā nah svastayé.’

‘He, be unto us, as a father to son, Agni, easy to access.

Be together optimum, properly, for our welfare.’

—      Ved: R’gved: 1| 1| 9

Ihaiv stam mā vi yaushŧam vishvamāyurvyashnutam,

Krīdantau putrairnaptr’bhirmodmānau své gr’hé.’

‘Abide ye both only here. Don’t be separated. Enjoy whole life sporting with sons grandsons, rejoicing in own home.’

—      Ved: R’gved: 10| 85| 42

Ihaiv stam mā vi yaushŧam vishvamāyurvyashnutam,

Krīdantau putrairnaptr’bhirmodmānau svastakau.’

‘Abide ye both only here. Don’t be separated. Enjoy whole life sporting with sons grandsons4, rejoicing in the lovely home.’

—      Ved: Atharv Ved: 14|1|22

The Communist thinkers never thought, neither they could, in those days of too limited resources to research anything that, marriage institution was not the only vice in their pathway to Communism.

In fact, the singles are more severe problems in their way.

The Communist thinkers wildly opposed marriage institution and family.

In fact they are still opposing it blindly, not even realizing the fact that the entire history of humankind has already proven them wrong now.

The Communism as a movement has lost its original momentum now.

It is not because it’s nonsense, as it’s claimed by its blind communal opponents.

The Communism as a movement is not nonsense.

It is necessary for the uplifting of the downtroddens.

Even Hinduism has the same goal as The Communism as a movement has.

The point where Hinduism differs with the Communism as a movement is not its goal, its means of implementation instead.

So, the Communism as a movement doesn’t need to oppose either marriage institution or family ever to achieve its mission.

Hinduism, Islam, Judaism, Christianity, in fact no religion, basically, is in opposition to the Communism as a movement, at all.

The Communism as a movement believed that the mission could be achieved through the dictatorship of the laborers.

The subsequent history of humankind has now expressly proven that such a belief of the then Communists was wrong.

Why?

Because, as already said, the Communism was then only a theory.

It was never practiced by its propellers.

Every theory when it is brought into practice, always refines itself.

No theorist can ever anticipate, absolutely and flawlessly, what lies in its pathway in future.

After all, every theorist, whatsoever theory he/she propels, is a human being, and bound to remain a human being.

A human being is not an omniscient, neither he/she ever can be.

So, howsoever the theory he/she proposes is flawless when propelled, it’s bound to prove in future that it wasn’t so.

The laborers never knew how the enterprises are built up and run.

If they had known how to build up enterprises and how to run them, they would have already done it without any help of the Communist thinkers.

Why have they waited for the moment the Communist thinkers declare them the dictators of a country?

To build up any enterprise first of all an enterpriser has to dream of it to the extent that it becomes an obsession to him/her.

Until and unless it isn’t an obsession to him even an enterpriser can’t build up any enterprise let alone any laborer or a group of laborers.

An enterpriser builds up his/her enterprise first in his/her own mind with its each and every minutest details.

He is so obsessed with these minutest details that, he sees it in his mind.

This imaginary vision in his/her mind always exists in his/her mind while he/she attempts to bring it into fact.

Until and unless this obsession does not become his/her madness, he/she can’t bring into existence.

It’s also a labor, the original Communist thinkers never realized.

That’s why when they took hold of the excellently running enterprises and put them under the dictatorship of the laborers, even the excellently running enterprises failed to continue.

The dictators lacked this vision, this obsession, and this madness.

It was the oxygen an enterpriser supplies to the enterprises.

Unfortunately only he/she can do it, none else.

The Communist thinkers never realized it.

The Communist thinkers made the laborers dictators on the shrewd persons who knew very well how to win the obstacles in their pathways.

They bribed the laborers in administration heavily.

The laborers in administration had never seen money.

They surrendered to the bribery of shrewdest businesspersons.

The movement started suffering heavily.

And ultimately it flopped.

It had to.

The laborers in administration were most of the persons who were everlosers.*

Watch your present day politicians.

Who are they?

Isn’t it a fact that most of them are the persons who are highly Uneducated/Under educated?

Isn’t it a fact that so many of them are criminal/criminal minded?

Why is it so?

Because most of the laborers in administration were dictators, but the persons they dictated were shrewder and more efficient.

The businesspersons became kingmakers instead of kings.

Apparently the businesspersons were not administrators, the chosen representatives of the people were.

But the businesspersons were kingmakers and shrewder.

The dictatorship of the Uneducated/Under educated ones, on shrewder persons, made itself ineffective.

Administration requires prudence.

The laborers in administration hadn’t developed it.

The system, consequently, failed.

It had to.*

Ved: 4 Atharv Ved: Kānd 14| Vivāh Kānd: Sookt 1| Mantr 3

——————————————————————————

More Commentary on Ved from DSM Satyarthi:

1. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

2. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 1| Mantr 2

3. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 1| Mantr 3

4. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 5| Mantr 3

5. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 7| Mantr 5

6. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 7| Mantr 8

4. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 1

5. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 2

6. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 3

7. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 4

8. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 5

9. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 6

10. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 7

11. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 8

12.R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 9

13. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 33| Mantr 1

14. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 33| Mantr 2

14. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 58| Mantr 6

15. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 164| Mantr 20

16. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 164| Mantr 46

17. R’gved: Mandal 2| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

18 R’gved: Mandal 3| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

19. R’gved: Mandal 3| Sookt 6| Mantr 2

20. R’gved: Mandal 4| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

21. R’gved: Mandal 4| Sookt 26| Mantr 2

22. R’gved: Mandal 5| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

23. R’gved: Mandal 6| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

24. R’gved: Mandal 7| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

25. R’gved: Mandal 8| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

26. R’gved: Mandal 9| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

27. R’gved: Mandal 9| Sookt 63| Mantr 4-5

28. R’gved: Mandal 10| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

29. R’gved: Mandal 10| Sookt 85| Mantr 42

30. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 1| Mantr 1

31. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 1| Mantr 2

32. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 1| Mantr 3

33. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 1| Mantr 4

34. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 11| Mantr 1

35. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 13| Mantr 4

36. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 23| Mantr 3

37. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 31| Mantr 18

38. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 40| Mantr2

39. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 40| Mantr8

40. Saamved: Mantr 1

41. Sāmved: Mantr 115

42. Sāmved: Mantr 641: Mahānāmnyārchik| 1

43. Sāmved: Mantr 650: Mahānāmnyārchik| 10

44. Sāmved: Mantr 651: Uttarārchik

45. Atharv Ved: Kaand 1| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

46.  Atharv Ved: Kānd 3| Sookt 30| Mantr 3

47. Atharv Ved: Kānd 3| Sookt 30| Mantr 4

48. Atharv Ved: Kānd 3| Sookt 30| Mantr 6

49. Atharv Ved: Kānd 4| Sookt 4| Mantr 6

50. Atharv Ved: Kānd 4| Sookt 4| Mantr 7

51. Atharv Ved: Kānd 4| Sookt 4| Mantr 8

52. Atharv Ved: Kaand 4| Sookt 13| Mantr 1

53. Atharv Ved: Kaand 8| Sookt 1| Mantr 6

54. Atharv Ved: Kaand 8| Sookt 4| Mantr 22

55. Atharv Ved: Kaand 14| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

56. Atharv Ved: Kaand 14| Sookt 1| Mantr 2

57. Atharv Ved: Kaand 14| Sookt 1| Mantr 3

58. Atharv Ved: Kaand 14| Sookt 1| Mantr 4

59.  Atharv Ved: Kaand 14| Sookt 1| Mantr 22

60.Atharv Ved: Kaand 14| Sookt 2| Mantr 25

Wa in tusliħū wa tattaqū: And if you correct and control yourself

Wa in tusliħū wa tattaqū

And if you correct and control yourself

Fa innallah kān Ghafūranrraħīman

Then indeed Allah is ever forgiving and Merciful

Al Qur’an Al Kareem: 4 An Nisā’: 129

DSM Satyarthi

It is generally, and quite erroneously, believed that Al Qur’an Al Kareem guarantees Jannat for all the Musalmīn if they keep their Īmān whether they follow other requisites of Islam or otherwise.

This erroneous idea of salvation is a bidåt, a new distortion, in Musalmīn after Christianity.

Of all the religions only Christianity believes that a person’s salvation is not dependent on his/her own good deeds.

It depends on his/her undisputed belief and surrender to Lord Jesus Christ.

Hinduism is well known for its Karmphal Siddhānt:

Kurvannévéh karmāñi jijĪvishéchchhatagvong samāh,

Évam tvayi nānyathéto’sti na karm lipyaté naré.’

‘Only doing Karm/works here, one should wish to live hundreds of years. Only this is the way, none else; so Karm cleaveth not to man.’

Ved: 2 Yajurved: 40|2

Karmañyévādhikārasté mā phaléshu kadāchan.

Mā karmphalhéturbhūrmā té sango’stvakarmañi.’

‘Your right is only in deeds, never in results. Don’t be obsessed with the result. Neither your obsession should be in worklessness.’

Shrīmad Bhagvad Gītā: 2|47

In the beginning, there was only one religion, Hinduism.

The human beings were tired of doing work and practicing righteousness 24x7x365.

So they devised Zoroastrianism.

It was some relief to the persons of normal prudence from the never compromising Hinduism.

Yet even the prophet Zoroaster could not suggest this ridiculous idea that one can get salvation only having undisputed belief on someone.

It was only a long afterward the inventor of present Christianity could dare it.

As far as Al Qur’an Al Kareem and Islam is concerned I find the salvation/ Al Jannat is not so easy to be achieved.

Even the forgiveness and the mercy of Allah is conditional according to Al Qur’an Al Kareem:

Wa in tusliħū wa tattaqū’

And if you correct and control yourself

Fa inn Allah kān Ghafūranrraħīman

Then indeed Allah is ever forgiving and Merciful

Al Qur’an Al Kareem: 4 An Nisā’: 129

Wa in tusliħū a tattaqū

‘And if you correct and control yourself’

What does this Āyat-e-Karīmah is telling actually?

It tells if one does not correct ‘tusliħū and does not control himself/herself tattaqū he/she would never be forgiven.

Neither even the mercy of Allah would be for him/her.

—————————————————————————

More on Islam from DSM Satyarthi:

1. Bal huv qur’anum majeedun fe LAUHIM MAHFOOZIN

2. Innahu laquranun kareemun Fee kitabin maknoonin

3. ‘Hudallilmuttaqeen’: ‘Guidance for controllers of organs’: 2 Al Baqarah: 2

4. ‘Alaa qalbik litakoon minal-munzireen’ ‘upon your heart one of who to warn’

5. Muslimahs! Come to India. I recommend Hindu lovers for all the Muslimahs.: Khadeejah Muhammad

6. Islam according to Qur’an and Maulana Maududi rahamatullh alaihi

7. A Moment of grave thinking for the entire sophisticated Muslim Community

8. ‘SET THIS WOMAN for WELL DOER’: ‘Imaam naareem Sukr’te dadhaat’

9. ‘V’ innahu fe UMMALKITAABI ladainaa la’liyyun hakeemun’: 43/4

10. Most Present day Muslms don’t do what Huzoor(SAW) did:

11. The Muslim beauties are wooing Hindu men FASTEST

12. ‘What really matters in the sight of God’: Maulana: Maududi

13. Why did Islam face a counter revolution at Karbala?

14. Why there are differences among us?

15. No differences Please!

16. Llā yamassuhu illā almutahharūn

17. Fa’in kħiftum allā tådilū fa wāħidatan

18. Islam according to Ved

19. Wa in tusliħū wa tattaqū: And if you correct and control yourself

——————————————————————————————–

1. On Hinduism

2. On Islam

3. On History

4. Commentary on Ved

5. Science Fiction

6. More Creative Adult Sex in English from Durgesh

7.Durgesh in Hindi/Urdu

———————————————————————————

More on Hinduism from DSM Satyarthi:

1. ‘Bhoorbhuvah svah!’ ‘The Existence! The Consciousness! The Bliss!’

2.‘Devasy’ pashy’ kaavyam, n’ mamaar, n’ jeeryati.’

3. Hinduism shines

4.Ved is the eternal law book having infinite knowledge in it for human beings

5. ‘According to facts’: ‘Yaathaatathyatah’

6. ‘SET THIS WOMAN for WELL DOER’: ‘Imaam naareem Sukr’te dadhaat’

7. The Evernew Hinduism: Yaathaatathyatah: Ved 2|40|8

8. ‘How to cross death’: ‘Tamev viditvaati mr’tyumeti’: Ved2Yajurved|31|18

9. According to Hinduism: We must be polite, not coward

10.Ye yathaa maam prapadyante taanstathaiv bhajaamyaham: Lord Kr’shn

—————————————————————————————————

Commentary on Ved from DSM Satyarthi:

1. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

2. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 1| Mantr 2

3. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 5| Mantr 3

4. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 5| Mantr 3

5. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 7| Mantr 5

6. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 7| Mantr 8

4. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 1

5. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 2

6. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 3

7. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 4

8. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 5

9. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 6

10. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 7

11. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 8

12.R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 9

13. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 58| Mantr 6

14. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 164| Mantr 20

15. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 164| Mantr 46

16. R’gved: Mandal 2| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

17 R’gved: Mandal 3| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

18. R’gved: Mandal 3| Sookt 6| Mantr 2

19. R’gved: Mandal 4| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

20. R’gved: Mandal 5| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

21. R’gved: Mandal 6| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

22. R’gved: Mandal 7| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

23. R’gved: Mandal 8| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

24. R’gved: Mandal 9| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

25. R’gved: Mandal 9| Sookt 63| Mantr 4-5

26. R’gved: Mandal 10| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

27. R’gved: Mandal 10| Sookt 85| Mantr 42

28. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 1| Mantr 1

29. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 1| Mantr 2

30. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 1| Mantr 3

31. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 1| Mantr 4

32. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 11| Mantr 1

33. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 13| Mantr 4

34. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 23| Mantr 3

35. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 31| Mantr 18

36. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 40| Mantr8

37. Saamved: Mantr 1

38. Sāmved: Mantr 115

39. Sāmved: Mantr 641: Mahānāmnyārchik| 1

40. Sāmved: Mantr 650: Mahānāmnyārchik| 10

41. Sāmved: Mantr 651: Uttarārchik

42. Atharv Ved: Kaand 1| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

43.  Atharv Ved: Kānd 3| Sookt 30| Mantr 3

44. Atharv Ved: Kānd 3| Sookt 30| Mantr 4

45. Atharv Ved: Kānd 3| Sookt 30| Mantr 6

46. Atharv Ved: Kānd 4| Sookt 4| Mantr 6

47. Atharv Ved: Kānd 4| Sookt 4| Mantr 7

48. Atharv Ved: Kānd 4| Sookt 4| Mantr 8

49. Atharv Ved: Kaand 8| Sookt 1| Mantr 6

50. Atharv Ved: Kaand 8| Sookt 4| Mantr 22

51.  Atharv Ved: Kaand 14| Sookt 1| Mantr 22

52.Atharv Ved: Kaand 14| Sookt 2| Mantr 25

Why can’t we love each other?: Innallāh yuħibbul muttaqīn

Why can’t we love each other?:

Innallāh yuħibbul muttaqīn

Indeed, Allah loves the persons who control

themselves.

̶Al Qur’ān Al Karīm: 9 At-Tawbah: 4

DSM Satyarthi

I’m sorry to say that I don’t agree with the highly educated persons who claim that Al Qur’ān Al Karīm and Islam itself is dangerous to humankind.

I respect their concern for humankind.

As one of the humankind I also want to join them to protect myself, if even not the others.

But the fact is, the more I peruse Ved, Bible and Al Qur’ān Al Karīm, the more I find they don’t differ in their basic teachings.

The reason my such friends find Al Qur’ān Al Karīm and Islam itself is dangerous to humankind, is that they don’t study Al Qur’ān Al Karīm in its original Arabic.

They accept the explanations of Al Qur’ān Al Karīm its misinterpreters advance.

Please, never do it.

It’s the ever worst mistake the critics of Islam are repeating ever since Islam has come into existence.

I propose them to study Al Qur’ān Al Karīm in its original Arabic, thoroughly rejecting its explanations from its communal interpreters.

I’m sure and immensely confident you’ll find, neither Al Qur’ān Al Karīm nor Islam itself, is as dangerous to humankind as my such friends think.

Yes, the Arabs, the Iranians and so many of the  Musalmīn even, are using both Al Qur’ān Al Karīm and Islam today for spreading their own imperialism.

But that’s what I’ve already written in my now famous essay:

Most Present day Muslims don’t do what Huzoor(SAW) did’.

I request you to go through it once more.

How Al Qur’ān Al Karīm and Islam itself is responsible for what its so called followers do?

Al Qur’ān Al Karīm says:

Innallāh yuħibbul muttaqīn.’

‘Indeed, Allah loves the persons who control themselves.’

̶ Al Qur’ān Al Karīm: 9 At-Tawbah: 4

Do the terrorists control themselves?

Are they really muttaqīn?

Do the imperialists control themselves?

Are the imperialists really muttaqīn?

I don’t think so.

My dear friends, my very dear friends, Islam is not in what the terrorists, the imperialists and even the Musalmīn do.

The Musalmīn have to follow Islam.

Islam doesn’t have to follow Musalmīn.

Please be rational.

Don’t resort to irrationalism only because the terrorists, the imperialists and even the Musalmīn do so.

Islam itself tells what it is really.

I’ve already written an essay on it too:

Islam according to Qur’an and Maulana Maududi rahamatullh alaihi’.

One more reference to the persons who are really interested:

Islam according to Ved.’

I hope my such friends now will try to act more responsibly.

Please stop throwing mud on each other.

Why can’t we love each other instead, my dear friends?

Why there are differences among us?

How to establish ‘Rām Rājý’/

Ħukūmat-e-Ilāhī/The Kingdom of God

 —————————————————————————

More on Islam from DSM Satyarthi:

1. Bal huv qur’anum majeedun fe LAUHIM MAHFOOZIN

2. Innahu laquranun kareemun Fee kitabin maknoonin

3. ‘Hudallilmuttaqeen’: ‘Guidance for controllers of organs’: 2 Al Baqarah: 2

4. ‘Alaa qalbik litakoon minal-munzireen’ ‘upon your heart one of who to warn’

5. Muslimahs! Come to India. I recommend Hindu lovers for all the Muslimahs.: Khadeejah Muhammad

6. Islam according to Qur’an and Maulana Maududi rahamatullh alaihi

7. A Moment of grave thinking for the entire sophisticated Muslim Community

8. ‘SET THIS WOMAN for WELL DOER’: ‘Imaam naareem Sukr’te dadhaat’

9. ‘V’ innahu fe UMMALKITAABI ladainaa la’liyyun hakeemun’: 43/4

10. Most Present day Muslms don’t do what Huzoor(SAW) did:

11. The Muslim beauties are wooing Hindu men FASTEST

12. ‘What really matters in the sight of God’: Maulana: Maududi

13. Why did Islam face a counter revolution at Karbala?

14. Why there are differences among us?

15. No differences Please!

16. Llā yamassuhu illā almutahharūn

———————————————————————————

More from DSM Satyarthi:

1.  Commentary on Ved

2. More On Hinduism

3. On Islam

4. On History

5. Science Fiction

6.  Creative Adult Sex in English from Durgesh

7. Durgesh in Hindi/Urdu

—————————————————————–

More on Hinduism from DSM Satyarthi:

1. ‘Bhoorbhuvah svah!’ ‘The Existence! The Consciousness! The Bliss!’

2.‘Devasy’ pashy’ kaavyam, n’ mamaar, n’ jeeryati.’

3. Hinduism shines

4.Ved is the eternal law book having infinite knowledge in it for human beings

5. ‘According to facts’: ‘Yaathaatathyatah’

6. ‘SET THIS WOMAN for WELL DOER’: ‘Imaam naareem Sukr’te dadhaat’

7. The Evernew Hinduism: Yaathaatathyatah: Ved 2|40|8

8. ‘How to cross death’: ‘Tamev viditvaati mr’tyumeti’: Ved2Yajurved|31|18

9. According to Hinduism: We must be polite, not coward

10.Ye yathaa maam prapadyante taanstathaiv bhajaamyaham: Lord Kr’shn

—————————————————————————————————

Commentary on Ved from DSM Satyarthi:

1. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

2. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 1| Mantr 2

3. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 5| Mantr 3

4. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 5| Mantr 3

5. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 7| Mantr 5

6. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 7| Mantr 8

4. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 1

5. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 2

6. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 3

7. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 4

8. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 5

9. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 6

10. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 7

11. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 8

12.R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 9

13. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 58| Mantr 6

14. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 164| Mantr 20

15. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 164| Mantr 46

16. R’gved: Mandal 2| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

17 R’gved: Mandal 3| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

18. R’gved: Mandal 3| Sookt 6| Mantr 2

19. R’gved: Mandal 4| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

20. R’gved: Mandal 5| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

21. R’gved: Mandal 6| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

22. R’gved: Mandal 7| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

23. R’gved: Mandal 8| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

24. R’gved: Mandal 9| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

25. R’gved: Mandal 9| Sookt 63| Mantr 4-5

26. R’gved: Mandal 10| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

27. R’gved: Mandal 10| Sookt 85| Mantr 42

28. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 1| Mantr 1

29. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 1| Mantr 2

30. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 1| Mantr 3

31. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 1| Mantr 4

32. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 11| Mantr 1

33. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 13| Mantr 4

34. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 23| Mantr 3

35. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 31| Mantr 18

36. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 40| Mantr8

37. Saamved: Mantr 1

38. Sāmved: Mantr 115

39. Sāmved: Mantr 641: Mahānāmnyārchik| 1

40. Sāmved: Mantr 650: Mahānāmnyārchik| 10

41. Sāmved: Mantr 651: Uttarārchik

42. Atharv Ved: Kaand 1| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

43.  Atharv Ved: Kānd 3| Sookt 30| Mantr 3

44. Atharv Ved: Kānd 3| Sookt 30| Mantr 4

45. Atharv Ved: Kānd 3| Sookt 30| Mantr 6

46. Atharv Ved: Kānd 4| Sookt 4| Mantr 6

47. Atharv Ved: Kānd 4| Sookt 4| Mantr 7

48. Atharv Ved: Kānd 4| Sookt 4| Mantr 8

49. Atharv Ved: Kaand 8| Sookt 1| Mantr 6

50. Atharv Ved: Kaand 8| Sookt 4| Mantr 22

51.  Atharv Ved: Kaand 14| Sookt 1| Mantr 22

52.Atharv Ved: Kaand 14| Sookt 2| Mantr 25

Counter Revolution

Counter Revolution

DSM Satyarthi

1. Why does counter-revolution take place even to the best revolution, sooner or later?

2. What can be done to stop it for ever?

3. Even the best revolution can’t convert everyone to his/her optimum.

4. The part less optimum, in everyone, is negligent, at least somewhat, to the persons who were not with the revolution, but now have submitted, due to the success of the revolution.

4. The persons against revolution capitalize on it.

5. They build their strategy on it to counter revolt.

6. How did it happen with Islam , and why and how did Yazīd Malåūn succeed?

7. Why did Ħazrat Ålīrzu not revolt against Ħazrat Siddīq-e-Åāzamrzu, Ħazrat Fārūq- e-Åāzamrzu and Ħazrat Ůsmān Ghanīrzu?

Get all the answers in the great historical novel ‘Counter Revolution’ from DSM Satyarthi

Coming soon @ the link below:

Counter Revolution

Ħalālah

Ħalālah

It was designed in Islam to stop inadvertent, irate,  divorces.

The munāfiqīn use it to satisfy their vile intentions.

Is Islam responsible for it?

DSM Satyarthi

Coming Soon

Meditation: An eversuicidal mistake

Meditation:

An eversuicidal mistake

DSM Satyarthi

Wikipedia states:

‘Etymology

The word meditation comes from the Indo-European root med-, meaning “to measure.”[1][2] It entered English as meditation through the Latin meditatio, which originally indicated any type of physical or intellectual exercise, then later evolved into the more specific meaning “contemplation.”— ’

I don’t think this information is correct.

The writer is quite mistaken due to his/her western, self-imposed blindness.

I’ve already commented on the subject:

The mental slavery of the English-educated Indians’.

I’ve said in the article:

‘This erroneous westerner view is entirely baseless.’

Actually, the western culture is doing the same mistake now, once Hinduism, Persianism, Judaism, Christianity, Islam and even the Communism did.

The history stands to evidence that once all these six global conquerors did this mistake, they could not survive.

We must try to understand this everfatal, suicidal, historical mistake that kills a dominant culture gradually ultimately.

The western culture is listing itself on its seventh place.

Soon we’d say:

‘Actually, the xxxxxxx culture is doing the same mistake now, once Hinduism, Persianism, Judaism, Christianity, Islam, Communism and even the western culture did.’

Let’s analyze what this everfatal, suicidal, historical mistake is.

Ved/Eishān Param Brahm Paramātmā instructs us to concentrate on two principles and never to forget them:

Yet, we forgot them.

The principles are:

1. ‘Dhiyo yo nah prachodayāt’.

2. ‘Yāthātathyatah’.

We forgot them.

The Hindus were ruling the globe then:

‘The wonder that was India’.

Hinduism says:

‘As nar nahin janmeu jag māhīn,

Prabhutā pāi jāhi mad nāhīn.’

‘No such person has taken birth in the Multiverse that has got the sovereignty and hasn’t become mad.’

—Shri Rāmcharit Mānas

We forgot the admonition of Eishān Param Brahm Paramātmā/VED to us, and refused to understand the facts the Persians had realized then and requesting us to act accordingly:

1. ‘Dhiyo yo nah prachodayāt’.

2. ‘Yāthātathyatah’.

We refused to see that those are the facts actually.

What happened?

The Constitution of the Creations, Ved, worked.

It was never biased in the favor of Pseudo-Hindus.

We lost our power gradually ultimately to the Persians.

Why?

Because, now the Persians were following the two principles practically, and we were NOT:

1. ‘Dhiyo yo nah prachodayāt’.

2. ‘Yāthātathyatah’.

We thought we are Hindus whether we practice Ved actually or not.

The constitution of the Creations did not recognize our such authority.

It refused our victory, recognizing that of the Persians.

Why?

Had the Ved failed?

No.

Certainly not.

It decided in the favor of Persians, because the Persians followed the two Principles discussed above:

1. ‘Dhiyo yo nah prachodayāt’.

2. ‘Yāthātathyatah’.

They did not have their names in Vedic Sanskr’t.

They had their own language that was a distortion of Vedic Sanskr’t.

They called it Persian.

They had their names in it.

Pseudo Hinduism was defeated and the actual Hinduism won.

Persians replaced Pseudo Hindus in leading the globe.

Unfortunately, even the Persians forgot the fact why and how did they win over the so-called Hindus then.

It was remembered till the original winners lived.

It did not last forever.

Their children and the children of their children, eventually, replaced them.

They were taught the wrong history.

They were not told the fact that their ancestors won on Hindus due to the mistakes of then Hindus.

They were told that their ancestors were great persons.

It always does happen, as if it’s an immortal law.

Every person, who is interested in studying how a culture is replaced by the next, must understand that it happens due to the mistakes of heirs of the successful persons.

Enjoying success of their forefathers/ancestors, their successors gradually forget how their forefathers/ancestors had achieved it.

No success is achieved ever, by anyone, by enjoying life only.

Enjoying life is an absolutely different thing from achieving success.

It’s one thing to get success, it’s quite another thing to live and keep it.

The successors of the achievers forget it.

They forget how the success was achieved, what hard work had been done to get it, and what sacrifices have been made.

They act very irresponsibly, and lose what their forefathers/ancestors achieved through a non stop chain of hard work and sacrifices.

The westerners are also suffering from the same process.

The word ‘Meditation’ does not come from Indo-European root med-, meaning “to measure”, as it’s claimed.

It comes from Vedic Sanskr’t Dhātu/root/verb ‘Médhr’ sangamé ch’ (Bhvādigañ 601), meaning ‘synchronization’.

The word ‘Médhā’, in Vedic Sansskr’t, is itself derived from this Vedic Sanskr’t Dhātu/root/verb ‘Médhr’ sangamé ch’ (Bhvādigañ 601), meaning ‘synchronization’.

According to ‘Mādhavīyā Dhātuvr’ttih’,  the word ‘Médhā’ is ‘Bhidāditvādang’(Bhvādigañ 601).

I strongly advise to put down the suicidal mistake, pointed out here in quite detail, and get the correct information.

Ved is Not in the Vedmantrs we recite

—————————————————————————————

Commentary on Ved from DSM Satyarthi:

1. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

2. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 1| Mantr 2

3. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 5| Mantr 3

4. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 5| Mantr 3

5. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 7| Mantr 5

6. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 7| Mantr 8

4. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 1

5. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 2

6. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 3

7. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 4

8. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 5

9. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 6

10. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 7

11. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 8

12.R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 9

13. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 58| Mantr 6

14. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 164| Mantr 20

15. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 164| Mantr 46

16. R’gved: Mandal 2| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

17 R’gved: Mandal 3| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

18. R’gved: Mandal 3| Sookt 6| Mantr 2

19. R’gved: Mandal 4| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

20. R’gved: Mandal 5| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

21. R’gved: Mandal 6| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

22. R’gved: Mandal 7| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

23. R’gved: Mandal 8| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

24. R’gved: Mandal 9| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

25. R’gved: Mandal 9| Sookt 63| Mantr 4-5

26. R’gved: Mandal 10| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

27. R’gved: Mandal 10| Sookt 85| Mantr 42

28. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 1| Mantr 1

29. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 1| Mantr 2

30. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 1| Mantr 3

31. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 1| Mantr 4

32. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 11| Mantr 1

33. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 13| Mantr 4

34. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 23| Mantr 3

35. Saamved: Mantr 1

36. Sāmved: Mantr 641: Mahānāmnyārchik| 1

37. Sāmved: Mantr 650: Mahānāmnyārchik| 10

38. Sāmved: Mantr 651: Uttarārchik

39. Atharv Ved: Kaand 1| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

40.  Atharv Ved: Kānd 3| Sookt 30| Mantr 3

41. Atharv Ved: Kānd 3| Sookt 30| Mantr 4

42. Atharv Ved: Kānd 3| Sookt 30| Mantr 6

43. Atharv Ved: Kaand 8| Sookt 1| Mantr 6

44. Atharv Ved: Kaand 14| Sookt 1| Mantr 22

45.Atharv Ved: Kaand 14| Sookt 2| Mantr 25

———————————————————————————–

More on Ved from DSM Satyarthi:

1. ‘According to facts’: ‘Yaathaatathyatah’

2. According to Hinduism: We must be polite, not coward

3. Aheism can’t win Hinduism/Ved

4. Casteism is NOT an intgral part of Hinduism:’Samaanee prapaa sah vonnabhaagah’ ”Same drinking same share of food.’

5. Hinduism builds its society on SUKR’TS/Noble doers:’Imaam naareem Sukr’te dadhaat’

6. Hinduism is PRINCIPLES BASED , not PERSON BASED

7. One should not wish to die: Ved hates death

8. RELIGIOUS DEMOCRACY in Hinduism: Ekam sadvipra bahudhaa vadanti

9. Sanyas is not the goal of Hinduism

10. Sati tradition was an Aasur Tradition, not Vedic at all

Yūsuf or Kr’shñ?-1

Yūsuf or Kr’shñ?

Who is our role model?

What do you want to be?

What do you want your children to be?

DSM Satyarthi

Chapter 1

The War Policy of the Hindus

Maulānah Imran looked at Ållāmah Ibrāhīm gravely,

“Ållāmah muħtaram, the problem is grave.”

“I know, Maulānah!”

“This new system of life is revolting our youth against Islam itself.”

“We can’t face it within the limits Islam has prescribed.” Akram said, almost complaining, “If we live within the limits, our daughters and sisters are revolting, leaving Islami Mumālik, in a large number, under this or that pretext. Once out of  Islami Mumālik, they are beyond our legal approach. They marry non Muslims, or just live in with them.”

“This new system of life is harming Islam more than even Durgesh has harmed.” Muħammad Ħasan could not control him.

Maulānah Imran smiled,

“Imām Sāħab, I don’t think Durgesh is responsible for this situation.”

Muħammad Ħasan looked at Maulānah Imran gravely.

“I can understand your dependence on Durgesh, Maulānah!”

“Can you suggest me any alternate from Musalmeen?”

“Nonsense, Maulānah Imran,” Ållāmah Ibrāhīm almost scolded, “do you believe Islam has failed? Allah, nauzbillah, has too?”

“Certainly not, Ållāmah muħtaram!”

“Then, will you please explain to me what do you mean?” Instead Maulānah Imran, Akram said impatiently, “It is not an ilmī baħas we are facing, gentlemen. My wife wants sex in broad daylight.”

“Zubédah?”

“No, not Zubédah, Nasreen.”

“Allah kā shukr hai. That’s what I thought.”

“But Zubédah herself is not måsūm.”

“What do you mean?”

“She is the mastermind behind it all.” Akram informed them curtly.

It was Masjid-e Nabvīs.

Salāt-e-Isha’a was just finished.

The Musalmeen were just chatting after the Salāt.

Akram was not feeling comfortable.

He did not want to be another Imām Muħammad Ħasan.

It was Akram’s well thought conclusion that Imām Muħammad Ħasan has lost to Durgesh miserably.

After all, what more a man can lose?

Durgesh has successfully managed to maintain live in relationships with Imām Muħammad Ħasan’s every houselady.

Live in relationships.

Durgesh has not even bothered to marry them.

Imām Muħammad Ħasan thundered at Akram,

“So you want Durgesh to marry our houseladies?”

“Imām Sāħab!”

“Akram Sāħab, I didn’t know you are so against us Musalmeen.”

“What do you mean?”

“They are maintaining only their live in relationships with Durgesh.”

“So?”

“Why do you want Durgesh to marry them?”

“Your daughters from them are also doing the same with Durgesh one by one. Naåīmah is the latest.”

“I did not know Nafīsah Salmān would fail as a mother, so miserably.”

“Imām Sāħab! Naåīmah still respects and love you as her Abbū, very much.” “I’m proud of her, Akram Sāħab!”

“Yet she surrendered to Durgesh in the moonlight, providing him a historical shab-e-urosi and honeymoon for complete one month with her.”

Naåīmah is still faithful to me, as well as to Islam .”

“Alas, none else of your entire extremely beautiful houseladies proved to be so.” Imām Muħammad Ħasan observed Akram Salmān Sheikħ with keen interest,

“Akram, Nafīsah is your own real sister.”

“Yes.” Akram Salmān Sheikħ said somewhat curtly, “yet we married her to you.”

Imām Muħammad Ħasan was hit under the belt.

Yet he managed not to appear his hurt reactions to come on his bearded face.

In the long run, ultimately, he had learned somewhat how to do it.

His face was fully covered with beard.

And it helped.

Inadvertently, his brain remembered his wife, Nafīsah Salmān’s hateful remark,

“Now I know, Muħammad Ħasan, why do you Musalmeen keep your dirty faces so full of beards.”

“We do it to follow the Sunnat-e-Nabvīs. You understood it once, yourself.”

“Yes!” Nafīsah Salmān winked at him, “yet, I did not know then, it’s one more benefit to you Musalmeen.”

“Oh!”

“It helps you Musalmeen to hide your immense shame, for your inhumane deeds, behind it, although I doubt you Musalmeen feel any of such shame. It needs some inherent humanity to feel that.”

Nafīsah!”

“Huzoors knew you Musalmeen’d need beard very much to hide your dirty faces behind these heavy dirty beards.”

“Then why burqah? To hide you Musalmān Beauties’ entire shameful bodies always surrendered to non Musalmeen shamelessly nude?”

“Thank you. I knew you have such dirty views of us Musalmān Beauties.” Nafīsah Salmān cooed not impressed even a bit.

Naåīmah hates you, your own daughter.”

“Yes, I know.” Nafīsah Salmān smiled, “but I know too who is poisoning her mind against me.”

“Oh!”

Muħammad Ħasan, do you know why not even a single houselady of yours has accompanied you in your dirty fight against Durgesh?”

“Yes. Because you all have ravenous Musalmān Cunts that love to swallow Durgesh’s dirty Uncut Hindu Penis.”

“Dil ké bahlāné ko ‘Ghālib’, yé kħayāl achchhā hai.” Nafīsah Salmān smiled, “You couldn’t stop anyone of us, because you never tried to learn the real reason behind it.”

“That I’m impotent?” Imām Muħammad Ħasan smiled ironically, “Then what about other Musalmeen? Why their ardent Musalmān wives, their ardent Musalmān sisters, their ardent Musalmān daughters, their ardent Musalmān Ammīs, their ardent Musalmān Bahoo Bégums etc. etc. deserted them in favor of your own Durgesh and/or other Hindu Sex Maniacs?”

“They all are refusing to understand that we Musalmān Beauties also have our bodies and their physical needs consequently.”

“Oh, and only Uncut Hindu Penis understands it and quenches it?”

“I’m sorry to admit it, but it’s true nevertheless.”

“There are two ideologies, Nafīsah Salmān,” Imām Muħammad Ħasan said gravely, “one is represented by our Ħazrat Yūsuf ålaihissalām, and the second is represented by Lord Kr’shñ of Hindus.”

Nafīsah Salmān smiled,

“And you believe Ħazrat Yūsuf ålaihissalām is right?”

“Every true and ardent Musalmān must believe it.” Imām Muħammad Ħasan said observing his wife, Nafīsah Salmān, contemptuously.

Nafīsah Salmān observed Imām Muħammad Ħasan more scornfully,

“Why is it, Ħasan, that your Eimān is always aggressive when it has to do something against us Muslimahs and non Muslims?”

“Nonsense!”

Why do you always put us Muslimahs with non-Muslims, Ħasan?”

“You are crazy.”

“Why are you Musalmeen not truthful with even your own womankind?”

Durgesh has poisoned your mind against us Musalmeen very much.” Imām Muħammad Ħasan said gravely, “that’s how the Hindus work.”

“What do you mean?”

Hindus themselves have accepted it always in their own history, written by them ownselves that the Hindus were never men of the battle fields. The Hindus were, and still are, always, the men of the bed, the men of our women.”

“And you think everyone should hate Hindus for it. Don’t you?” Nafīsah Salmān laughed scornfully at her husband.

“Why not? The cowards! Always seeking shelter into our women’s skirts. Hindus never fought us Musalmeen on the battlefields. They always fought us fucking our womankind. The greatest weapon the Hindus have against us Musalmeen is their Uncut Hindu Penis. Can any Hindu deny it ever truthfully?”

Nafīsah Salmān smiled,

“Why should they?”

“Why not?”

“You are accepting the fact that you Musalmeen were always, and still are, blood hounds.”

“What?”

“And instead of being ashamed of it, you are shamelessly proud of it.”Nafīsah Salmān said curtly, “Hindus never hide the fact that instead of battle fields, they prefer sex more and more.”

Imām Muħammad Ħasan laughed ironically,

“And Hindus are proud of it?”

“Why shouldn’t they be?”

“Why should they be? Only the cowards can appreciate this policy.”

“Only inhumane can appreciate what you Musalmeen did in the history. It is full of blood and destruction. The entire humankind hates the blood soaked history of Musalmeen.

“And the entire humankind appreciates the sex oriented everdirty history of Hindus? The Hindus fucked our Musalmān houseladies in our own houses, on our own beds, when we were fighting with their fighters in the battlefields.”

“Well, it was war, Ħasan.”

“Oh, what a way to fight the wars. Send some fighters to fight with the Musalmeen in the battlefields, and send the second group of dirty sexy Hindus to the households of the Musalmeen to fuck their houseladies. Shame on Hindus.”

“I don’t think so.”

“Because you are sex obsessed for Uncut Hindu Penis.”

“It’s better to be sex obsessed for Uncut Hindu Penis than being blood hounds and the devils of destructions.”

“Shame on you.”

“Shame on me? No. Never. Shame on you, Ħasan. Sex is never destructive if used with good intentions by noble doers. War is never constructive. It’s always allowed as a last resort, by humankind, if there isn’t another way to the survival of humanity.”

Nafīsah Salmān kissed me on my lips,

“He is unable to understand our viewpoint, Durgesh!”

“I know, darling!”

“Can’t we do anything for Musalmeen, really?” Naåīmah Muħammad Ħasan asked me.

“You can also try to educate your father, Naåīmah.” I said gravely, “We Hindus always prefer sex on wars. That’s why we used our Divine Weapons, our divyāstrs, always only for our self-protection. We never attacked any country, any nation, with them.”

“But you Hindus always attacked other countries and other nations with your Uncut Hindu Penis. Didn’t you?” Naåīmah Muħammad Ħasan smiled cunningly, appreciatively.

“Well, darling,” I said gravely, “We never hide our policy in the matter. We are never hypocrites in the matter. We are not known for our Divine Weapons, our divyāstrs only. We have developed Kāmsootr,  Anangrang, Rati Rahasy’, Naagar Sarvasvam, Rati Manjaree, and even Tantrs, an Upved of Atharv Ved, too. Lord Vishñu went to the extent  to make love to his sisters in law/Salhajs Vr’nda and Tulsi, even deceiving them. Because, his brothers in law/Sālé Jālandhar and Shankhchoođ were evil doers. There is a complete Chapter ‘Pādārik Prakarañ-’ , Part 5, ‘About the wives of others’;  in Kaam Sootr. The Bachhalyas/Vatss followed this principle to the extent that they were termed to be Dev Gandharvs even. ‘Y’ gaam dhaaryati s’ gandharvah’.”

“Allah—Allah, I know, Durgesh.” Naåīmah Muħammad Ħasan interrupted me.

“Then what more you want to know?”

“I don’t want to know. I want to say something.”

“You are always welcome, darling, after that moonlight and after our honeymoon for one month, after all.”

“Musalmeen would never accept sex as a constructive diplomacy and a permanent policy of war.”

“And Hindus would never leave it. Why? I’ve already told you.”

Durgesh!”

“It’s not practical even.” I said, “War is destructive. It doesn’t contain any participation of women as women. No society can be built without an active participation of womankind. The policy ‘Imām nārīm sukr’té dadhāt has full participation of womankind in building a progressive human society. We Hindus have already done it by building an immortal society.”

Chapter 2

—————————————————————————————————————

 More from DSM Satyarthi:

1.  Commentary on Ved

2. More On Hinduism

3. On Islam

4. On History

5. Science Fiction

6.  Creative Adult Sex in English from Durgesh

7. Durgesh in Hindi/Urdu