Al Muħammad Al Qāsim’s utmost greedy relatives

Al Muħammad Al Qāsim’s

 utmost greedy relatives

  1.    Al Nadīm Al Quddūs Al Muħammad Al Qāsim’ half/real brother
  2.     Al Safiyah Al Ghaus Al Nadīm Al Quddūs’s awfully stunning wife, a mastermind, ex hostess of Las Vegas Nevada gambling house, the real brain power against Al Waħīdah Al Tawīd and Al Muħammad Al Qāsim.
  3.        Al Zakiyah Al Qāsim, Al Muħammad Al Qāsim’s sister
  4.          Vikram Bachhalyā, Al Zakiyah Al Qāsim’s husband
  5.           Al Lubnā Al Qāsim, Al Muħammad Al Qāsim’s one more sister
  6.           Pratāp Bachhalyā, Al Lubnā Al Qāsim’s husband
  7.          Al Hudā Al Qāsim Al Hāshmī, their advocate
  8.          Naåīmah Muħammad Ħasan, Al Safiyah Al Ghaus’s friend, philosopher and guide
  9. Naåīmah Muħammad Ħasan’s Seven Movements


1. More Creative Adult Sex in English from Durgesh

2.Durgesh in Hindi/Urdu

3. Science Fiction

4. On History

5. Commentary on Ved

6. On Hinduism

7. On Islam

Māmékam Sharañam Vraj: Follow me exclusively :1

Sarvdharmān parityajý,

Māmékam Sharañam Vraj

Denouncing everything else,

Follow me exclusively

DSM Satyarthi

The Father 



Chapter 1

 Kr’shñ Draupadī

I smiled.

“Who else is here?”

“You can’t run away from me. I’ll never let you.”

I looked at Draupadī gravely.


“’Kr’shñā’.” Draupadī interrupted me, “’Kr’shñasý patnī’, ‘Wife of Kr’shñ, ‘Kr’shñā’. I told you so many times.”

“Yes, I have seen now that even Pitr’vý Shrī, Drupad Uncle, is calling you, ‘Kr’shñā’.”

“That’s why he has invited you here, with your elder brother. Your father was too invited separately. Now since he has also come…”

“I don’t think my ‘Sakhī’, my girlfriend, doesn’t understand me enough to comprehend, she has to change herself for it.”

Draupadī laughed.

“How can you make to marry you conditional for us womankind?”

“I am not making conditional to marry me, you have yourself made it conditional to marry you. I am only responding to it.”

“Oh, I’ve made my marriage conditional? Consequently, you are justified in making your own marriage conditional too? Aren’t you denying our birthright thus?”

“I don’t think Āchārý Droñ deserves the punishment Pitr’vý Shrī, Drupad Uncle, has vowed for him.”

“I see.”

“You must have seen it far more before.” I muttered somewhat curtly.

“What? What did you say?” Draupadī was all-alert suddenly.

I smiled.

Draupadī was more emotional than my other Sakhīs, my other girlfriends.

“You must have seen it before you vowed to marry only the man who could kill Āchārý Droñ.”

“You won’t do it?”


“You think Uncle Droñ was right?”

“Certainly not. Nevertheless, Pitr’vý Shrī, Drupad Uncle, is himself not right that he vowed to kill Āchārý Droñ.”

“I don’t agree with you.”

“Why not? Didn’t you yourself kill even your own maternal uncle, Rāxasrāj Kans, because he arrested your parents illegally inhumanly? What you did is right, and it’s wrong if I do the same thing? I never imagined, even you have such a double standard.”*

I smiled.

“I appreciate your efforts to woo me, despite your vowed declaration that you would marry only the man who would kill Āchārý Droñ.”

“I am your wife already. “‘Kr’shñasý patnī, ‘Wife of Kr’shñ, ‘Kr’shñā. ‘Brahmcharyéñ kanyā’ yuwānam vindaté patim’, notPatih vindaté patnīm’.”

“Well, of course, I can’t stop any adult Yong woman to opt me her husband. Nevertheless, she can’t impose on me her own absurd ethics and/or her own absurd morals.”

“I don’t agree with you that my ethics and morals are absurd.”

“I know. That’s why I can’t marry you unless you won’t impose on me that I have to kill Āchārý Droñ.”

“He thinks Pānchāl is my father’s personal property that can be distributed between my father and Āchārý Droñ himself. It’s not Hinduism. It’s not Democracy. Āchārý Droñ is a yātudhān. He deserves to be awarded with death sentence for his yātudhānatv.”

I smiled.


Kr’shñā.” Draupadī interrupted me.

Kr’shñā,” I didn’t argue with her, “Death Sentence is the extreme sentence Ved suggests. We Hindus almost always try to avoid it.”

“Yet you killed your own maternal uncle yourself. Didn’t you?”

“Oh sure. With my fist. Didn’t I?”

“What do you mean?”

“If I really wanted to kill my maternal uncle, I would have prepared for it.”

“I still didn’t understand.” Draupadī looked at me quite perplexed.

“I would have using some weapon to kill him deliberately already, if I really wanted to kill him.”

“I see.” Draupadī smiled understandingly, “So you want to claim now that it was an accident that Kans was killed by you?”

“I wanted to arrest him alive and keep him as a prisoner for rest of his life as he kept my parents and my maternal grandfather in prison.” I said gravely.*

Draupadī laughed.

“Bosh and nonsense.”

“I know you can’t believe me.”

“Nobody will believe you.”

“I don’t blame anybody.” I said indifferently, “Usually the people think it’s justified if you kill someone if he had imprisoned your parents.”

Draupadī grimaced.

Rāxasrāj Kans hadn’t only imprisoned your parents. He imprisoned your maternal grandfather too. He was immensely against Democracy. He was a local tool of the utmost successful imperialist of today, Jarāsandh.”

“Sure,” I agreed with Draupadī, “I agree with you. But the question is should we Hindus kill every imperialist, and every human tool of an imperialist too?”

“Why not?” Draupadī asked curtly, “Don’t they kill us?”

“‘Māyābhirindr māyinam’?”

“Why not?”

“Oh, come on, Draupadī,…”


Kr’shñā, you know better.”

“I don’t.” Draupadī said doggedly.

“Yes, you do.” I too myself said insistently, “What I did, I did in self defense. I wasn’t executing death sentence on him. Neither the Ved Mantr ‘Māyābhirindr māyinam’ is as simple as you are implying it to be.”*

 Chapter 2


More from DSM Satyarthi:

1.  Commentary on Ved

2. More On Hinduism

3. On Islam

4. On History

5. Science Fiction

6.  Creative Adult Sex in English from Durgesh

7. Durgesh in Hindi/Urdu

Ved: Ved Bhashy’: R’gved: Mandal 1: Sookt 33: Mantr 10

Ved Bhāshý:



 Mandal 1

 Sūkt 33: Mantr 10


N’ yé divah pr’thivyā antamāpurn

māyābhirdhandām parýbhūvan.

Yujam vajram vr’shabhashchakr indro

nirjyotishā tamso gā aduxat.


n’| yé |divah| pr’thivyāh| antam| āpuh| n’| māyābhih| dhan’dām| pari’abhūvan| yujam| vajram| vr’shbhah| chakré| indrah| nih| jyotishā| tamsah| gāh| adhuxat.


They who neither did get the end of divine

heaven and earth, nor altogether disgraced the

female wealth giver, with wisdoms, vr’shabh did

yuj vajr.

The controller of organs, continuously,

with light, milked the cows from out of darkness.


  1. R’shi: Hirañyastūp Mahimvat Āngiras.

Lord Bhagvān Hirañyastūp Mahimvat Āngiras has witnessed so many Ved Mantrs in R’gved, Yajurved and Sāmved.

He has witnessed Sūkt 31-35, entire five Sūkts/hymns of R’gved, Mandal/Book 1, that Lord Bhagvān Agni Mahimvat R’gvedarshi have actually seen these five Sūkts.

He hasn’t written them himself from his own intellect.

It is said in Aétréý Brāhmañ 3|24, that Lord Bhagvān Hirañyastūp Mahimvat Āngiras achieved the throne of Indr, controller of organs.

Nirukt 10|3|32 states that Lord Bhagvān Hirañyastūp Mahimvat Āngiras was a R’shi, a seer, a Psychological Engineer.

According to Br’haddévtā 3|106, Lord Bhagvān Hirañyastūp Mahimvat Āngiras was honored with the friendship of Param Purush, the Absolute Man himself:

Hirañyastūpatām prāpý sakhyam chéndréñ shāshvatam…’

Hirañyastūp, receiving the eternal friendship of the controller of organs, Param Purush…’

Āchārý Sāyañ has also certified that Lord Bhagvān Hirañyastūp Mahimvat Āngiras was a R’shi, a seer, a Psychological Engineer:

Āngiraso Hirañyastūp R’shih…’

R’gved 1| Sūkt 31 Sāyañ Bhāshý

Dévtā/Divine subject: Indr, controller of organs.

Chhand/ Vedic Meter: Trishŧup.

2.    N’ yé divah antam āpuh’ ‘Who didn’t get the end of divine heaven.’

The Heaven is divine and endless.

Every reality is different from another and endless.

We have created you with a miraculous brain/body.

Your brain has its Conscious, Sub conscious and Para Conscious parts.

Similarly, your body has infinite etheric bodies inside it.

Each of your etheric bodies is related with a reality you

may conceive.

There are seven Chakrs, Cycles, in your physical body.

You may activate them one by one if you want to.

Thus, you may start your Heaven right from the very moment you want to.

This Heaven is already there for you, yet you can transform it according to your wishes, desires and needs.

It’s divine, endless and flexible to your wishes, desires and needs, if you are Shaktimān enough.

However, if you are an atheist and don’t believe in the existence of Para Normal, that’s what you get for you.

There’s no compulsion for you to believe in what you don’t want to believe in.

There’s no compulsion for you to have a faith in what you don’t want to have a faith in.

It depends on your option what the reality you want to live in for you.

The fools create their own hell for them by opting for it.

We haven’t created you for hell.

Nevertheless, we haven’t created you for creating hell for others too.

If you do it, Our Automatic Scientific System working everywhere is bound to punish you, and you can’t break Our Automatic Scientific System ever, however Shaktimān, however Powerful you are/might be ever.

3. ‘N’ yé pr’thivyā antamāpuh’.

The earth is similarly endless for the persons of action.

Everything depends actually on your point of view that how you see it ab initio.

If you are basically a negative thinker, you see everything with a negative point of view.

It leads you gradually eventually ultimately to helplessness and depression, consequently.

If you are basically a positive thinker you would never find yourself helpless, never reaching to depression ultimately.

A positive thinking always leads to action ultimately.

Whereas a negative thinking always leads to depression.

No positive thinker has gone mad anywhere ever, neither has s/he committed suicide ever anywhere.

It doesn’t mean there isn’t any negativity anywhere.

The negativity is there doubtlessly.

But you have to destroy it, and ignore it until it isn’t destroyed if you really want to survive and progress.

There is poison in existence too.

But it doesn’t imply ever that you are bound to eat/drink the poison.

It has another purpose altogether.

The poison is used in medicines positively.

There are some medicines that can’t be made if poison isn’t used in making them.

Similarly only the existence of negativity doesn’t mean you have to surrender to it too, necessarily.

There are some persons who argue with their immense stupidity that everything is made by Us for its use.

So, there are bound to be some persons to resort to stupidity, negativity and death.


We haven’t created negativity ever.

It’s your own creation due to your immense stupidity.

We never created death for you.

It’s your own creation due to your ever adamant ever insistent ever persistent inertia and negativity.

Your inertia stops your further evolution into humanity and divinity.

You have to fight with your inertia and the resultant negativity if you really want to survive and progress ever.

Your death isn’t in action ever.

It’s always in inaction:

‘Kurvannév karmāñi jijīvishéchchhatagvong samāh,

Évam tvayi nānýthéto’sti n’ karm lipyaté naré.’

 Doing Karm only, here, one should wish to live hundreds of years.

Only this is the way for thee, none else;

So Karm cleaveth not to man.’

̶Ved: Yajurved: 40|2

4.      Pari’ in original text.

5.      Abhūvan’ in original text.

Never disgrace any female whosoever she is, and/or whatsoever her attributes are.

Her usefulness for humanity is never in her human attributes only.

She is useful for humanity even if she is a female animal.

A Sukr’t, a sāliħ, a good man can still use her for the existence and/or survival/progress for humanity.

That’s why there isn’t any human culture at all, even if it is even infinitesimally human, that has allowed death sentence for womankind and children.

A woman is always ‘Dhandā’ ‘Wealth Giver’, even if she is used by the wicked persons ever.

It’s self-explicit therefore why one should never disgrace her/womankind.

6.      Dhandā’ ‘Wealth Giver’.

The offspring a woman gives is itself a wealth if

You ever understand.

7.      If you disgrace a woman you actually disgrace the wealth itself.

8.      It isn’t wisdom at all.


‘Māyā’ iti pragyā nāmasu paŧhitam.’: Nighanŧu: 3|9|9

11. ‘Yujam vajram vr’shabhashchakr’‘chakré’.

Most of the commentators from Brāhm denomination of Hinduism, not only insist but they even persistently keep arguing that ‘Vajr’ does not mean sexual male organ of a male that controls his organs and never uses any of his thus controlled organs against Our movement ‘Kr’ñvanto Vishvamāryam.

There are always some persons who charge Our obedients that they are liars/potential liars.

They say they have doubt in their credibility and therefore they are valid in not respecting them.

You may definitely leave them on their own anti Hindutv thoroughly erroneous thinking if they don’t want to improve them ever.

You may leave them with their ever erroneous ever harmful philosophy, but never bear, never tolerate if they disgrace your higher authorities in Hindutv.

Disgrace those morons yourselves to protect your own Hindutv.

Of course, you can’t order anyone out of Our Mandr, even if s/he is an atheist, but at the same time, you can’t allow them to disgrace or smirk your own higher authorities in Hindutv.

Your parents are of course not the parents of any guest that comes to your house, but it does not mean the guest can disgrace or smirk your parents and you have to tolerate it.


If you have to respect your guest, the guest must also respect you, your parents and your values.

The guest can discuss your values with your permission, but s/he does not have any cordial right even to disgrace or smirk them.

Disgrace or smirk that scoundrel yourself/yourselves.

You never have to tolerate if any person even discuss your values with you disgracing or smirking you.

It’s never a discussion.

It’s a holy war between two cultures orally under the disguise of discussion.

Never run away from any sort of Dharmyuddh, Vāj, whatsoever.

It may make you Yātudhān even.

Never tolerate or bear any disgrace or smirk of not only your higher authorities in Hindutv, but of that any Sukr’t even, nor that of your values too.

Svayambhūryāthātathyato’arthānvyadadhāchchhāshvatībhyah samābhyah.’

The Self existent has constituted the Values, according to facts, for eternal subjects/years.’

How can you allow anyone disgrace or smirk  these Values and can still value them yourselves?

If the Vr’trs/ Brātr’výs can respect their erroneous, even harmful to them religious values, why can’t you yourselves?

Make the scoundrels to respect your values and your higher authorities in Hindutv even when they want to discuss them with you.

Let them not accept Our Antim Ācharañ Nāyak Our Antim Ācharañ Nāyak, if they don’t want to.

It’s not one of Trishapt.

One can still be Our obedient if s/he respects and believes in Trishapt.

But s/he has to discuss it until s/he does not establish the fact beyond all reasonable doubt that s/he is justified in doing so.

As far as this argument is concerned that he is valid in not accepting Our Antim Ācharañ Nāyak Our Antim Ācharañ Nāyak until he does not complete Our Dharmsansthāpan, it’s absolutely unjustified prima facie.

What is there to accept after it’s complete?

Hinduism has in its basic Mantr:

Dhiyo yo nah prachodayāt

That impel our wisdoms’.

Where the wisdom is needed to understand anything if that is in front of your eyes.

Even an insect and an animal can see what is there in front of their eyes.

Then what for a human being needs wisdom?

Nobody is compelling any person(s) to accept Our Antim Ācharañ Nāyak Our Antim Ācharañ Nāyak.

We have never compelled even an atheist to accept Our Existence.

A person(s) is absolutely free not even to reject Our Antim Ācharañ Nāyak as Our Antim Ācharañ Nāyak, but even to act against him.

We are absolutely capable to protect him from all the scoundrels whoever come in his pathway to infinite humanity leading ever to divinity infinite.

We have protected him from the earlier holy wars some communal traditional Hindus fought against him.

We have protected him from terrorists and criminal Musalmīn.

We have protected him when he was fighting in writing for Us through an Islamic Magazine.

We have protected him when a Yātudhān challenged him that he is the worst sad person of the Multiverse that he doesn’t have a son.

We prophesied in Our Yogdr’shŧ Commentary of Ved then that not only Our Antim Ācharañ Nāyak but everyone that was following him then, would too have a son thereafter till further Yogdarshan otherwise.

The history stands to evidence it happened literally.

Didn’t it?

If you are really true in your conviction can you explain this phenomenon ever?

How Our Antim Ācharañ Nāyak could manage to do it if he were not Our Antim Ācharañ Nāyak?

We are always proving him that he is Our Antim Ācharañ Nāyak.

You haven’t proved even a single time that he is NOT Our Antim Ācharañ Nāyak.

Neither anyone can ever.

You can only create and spread suspicions, nothing else.

But even none of those suspicions is ever justified.

Our Antim Ācharañ Nāyak is building one after another  new heights for the entire humanity to reach, and what are you yourself doing?

Stand before a mirror and find it out yourself.

Our Antim Ācharañ Nāyak is fighting for humanity, NOT for any of his own selfish interest, whatsoever it may be.

Can you prove against it, beyond all reasonable doubt?

If ‘yes’, go ahead and prove it.

If ‘not’, shame on you that you are fighting against a selfless person even,

instead of fighting with the wretched lobby of the wicked ones.

Yujam vajram vr’shabhashchakr’‘chakré’ ‘Vr’shabh did yuj Vajr’ means the showerer, the sprayer, of semen unites his Vajr when he does it.

Never spill it out of any female organ.

The semen of a Vr’shabh is not as unimportant and worthless as to spill it ever out of any female sexual organ.

It’s an ever productive element.

Anything that’s made for any sort of production must never be wasted without production.

The Vr’tr Western Culture differs with Hinduism in this matter materially.

It says even masturbating is not as wrong as the entire religions say.

It says even lesbianism and gayness are not as wrong as the entire religions say.

Actually it has fought with these problems to its best but since it could not win these problems, gradually eventually ultimately it surrendered to them.

Hinduism/Ved is basically against everything and every action that’s ever unproductive if it can be made productive ever, by changing the social system/some arrangement that isn’t as productive as the new proposed system/ arrangement is.

Lesbianism is not actually a natural activity.

Gayness is similarly not a natural activity itself.

They are natural consequences of the gradual deviation of the West from the natural and scientific system of life the East had proposed in the form of Ved/Hinduism.

We know very well that most of the non-Hindus hate Ved/Hinduism very much, some of them even to the extent that they are uncompromisingly anti Hindu.

But it’s not because they know Ved/Hinduism competently.

On the contrary, it’s because they don’t even know what the real Ved/Hinduism is.

We suggest such persons not to lose their manhood, their family, the sanctity in their society and the infinite existence and endless progress of human beings.

It can be done still now if only you dissociate your unscientific prejudices against religion/Ved/Hinduism.

You were never taught what the true religion is, what the true Ved/Hinduism is.

Get rid of your prejudices against religion/Ved/Hinduism that you inherited from your ancestors, or from your ancestral society.

The humanity has come too far ahead now from the era when your ancestors, your ancestral society derived those prejudices against religion/Ved/Hinduism.

The fact is that these prejudices have brought you to your end if you can really see it.

Your ancestors, and your ancestral society hated Ved/Hinduism basically because it proposed to discipline your ancestors’ sex life too.

Due to their natural inertia they never wanted to discipline their sex life according to Ved/Hinduism proposed.

Your ancestors, your ancestral society was not alone that opposed Ved/Hinduism those days.

Even some of the sons of Hindus did it, were exiled ultimately and formed a new religion, Pārsism.

They claimed the Hindus were irons and the Parsis were Pāras, a stone that converts every iron into gold when it touches the iron.

They hated Hindus for their sex oriented religious practical scientific teachings.

The anti Hindu movement thus started first.

It was not easy to understand what the grave mistakes they were doing then.

But now it’s a history and we can study it perfectly unemotionally.

The irrefutable fact today is that the persons who were claiming they were the stones that were converting the iron Hindus then into gold, now have lost even their homeland for ever and are living in the homeland of Hindus they called irons once.

What happened?

Their over piety, not to understand the necessity of sexual discipline in their own household and society, ultimately started to destroy their family bindings.

It made their womankind vulnerable.

They surrendered to Hindus.

They had to.

We find Kaikéyī married to Dashrath and Mantharā conspiring against then better Hindu household and political system.

We find Gāndhārī married to Dhr’trāshŧr and Shakuni conspiring against then stronger empire Hastināpur.

In both the cases the women from outside were brought to India, not otherwise.

Do you need any more proof that Imām nārīm sukr’té dadhāt and Indro nirjyotishā tamso gā aduxat were really being practiced in ancient Hindus?

And India was stronger then, when India was practicing Imām nārīm sukr’té dadhāt and Indro nirjyotishā tamso gā aduxat.

Wasn’t it?

Should not the scholars and even other persons who claim Ved was neither ever interpreted principally nor practiced ever, it was only a book of worthless rituals, think afresh on what they believe erroneously still now?

It’s not detrimental to practicing Hindus now, it’s detrimental to yourselves.

Isn’t it?

The Hindus have their family bonds still stronger but can you say your family bonds are too as strong as that of Hindus?

Yes, you have some of the Apsarās from some traditional Hindus too.

But that was even when Hirañýkashipu conspired against Ved/Hinduism/Democracy.

Wasn’t it?

Didn’t Hinduism overcome it?

Didn’t Satī Dāxāyañī Brahmāpautrī revolt against such a rotten political system, successfully?

Didn’t entire Brahmarshis, Devarshis, Maharshis, and R’shis supported her even against Param Purush?

That’s the inherent attribute of Hinduism, ingredient into it.

It never surrenders to the wicked absolutely.

Yes, despite this inherent attribute of Hinduism the traditional Hindus were politically under the British and Musalmīn.

But it was never unopposed neither it lasted long ever.

What do you think Dīn-e-Ilāhī was?


Study it more deeply getting rid of your false historical prejudices.

R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 45| Mantr 6


More from DSM Satyarthi:

1.  Commentary on Ved

2. More On Hinduism

3. On Islam

4. On History

5. Science Fiction

6.  Creative Adult Sex in English from Durgesh

7. Durgesh in Hindi/Urdu

Ayesha Ahmed disagrees with the Women’s High status and Privileged Position

Ayesha Ahmed disagrees

with the

Women’s High status

and Privileged Position

DSM Satyarthi

Some of my readers have taken the trouble to inform me that an article of Ayesha Ahmed is not available to them when they click the link I’ve given to them in some of my writings.

I don’t know why it is so, if it is so.

However, I copy paste that article here for their, as well as others’ benefit, as I have previously did for some of the writings of my intimate friends Khadijah Muhammad and Sidrah Ahmad:

Women’s High status and

Privileged Position

by Ayesha Ahmed : Aug 2, 2003 :

Dear sisters: How many times have you heard this claim “sisters, you should be very happy that you have a very high status and a very privileged position in our religion” by the bearded ones in the mosques?

God alone knows what high status and which privileged position they talk about….

To be declared in the holy books that we are deficient in intelligence and that most of us will go to hell for being ungrateful to our husbands; and that we will make the big majority of the hell’s population?

To be told to share the husband with three other wives and many concubines, sex slaves and captive women which his right hand posses?

To be divorced by him at the drop of a hat by just his proclaiming 3 times “I divorce you” and we not having the same right to divorce him?

Husband getting 72 perpetually virgin beautiful houris with big eyes and swelling bosoms in the paradise and we getting the same old husband and share him with the 72 voluptuous houris? (Believe me sisters; he will be so busy there with the lovely houris that the only time he will see you will be in the hallways when he is going from one houri’s room to another houri’s room).

To be disciplined by the husband, by being beaten up by him with scourge (lash) and green sticks? (Unless you are into the kinky stuff and actually enjoy the beatings)..

Being raped and then be stoned to death for reporting it because you need 4 male witnesses to prove your innocence otherwise you yourself get accused of adultery? (Your only chance of finding 4 male witnesses is that if the attacker was of very low IQ or was really drunk and attacked you in the broad daylight in front of a bunch of degenerate horny men who watched and cheered and are later willing to testify)

Being wrongly accused of adultery by a conniving husband and be stoned for it because he does not need 4 male witnesses if he swears 4 times himself?

Being married at the age of 9 years to a much older man because it is sunna? To submit to him every time he desires you even if he wants it on the back of a camel, if he gets an untimely urge? (Not recommended, you both may fall down from camel’s back during the action and sustain injuries).

Being cursed all night by thousands of angels if you refuse him even for a genuine reason? (What a boring job for angels who are assigned to watch your bedroom, always waiting for the action, unless of course they enjoy watching; in that case they have a reason to be disappointed and pissed by your refusal).

To be declared half a person as witness in court or inheriting property?

To be asked to stay at home by scriptures and only leave home if husband permits; that too fully covered by a tent like garment even if it is scorching hot (hey, sweating is good for you as it opens skin pores, besides the tent covering protects you from the hot sun and elements which keeps you fair and beautiful; sisters you need all the help you can get to compete with the other wives and concubines).

The Muslim Beauties are wooing Hindu Men FASTEST


More from DSM Satyarthi:

1.  Commentary on Ved

2. More On Hinduism

3. On Islam

4. On History

5. Science Fiction

6.  Creative Adult Sex in English from Durgesh

7. Durgesh in Hindi/Urdu

The vastness of Hinduism

The vastness of Hinduism

DSM Satyarthi

Hinduism is so vast and so deep that even the most efficient learned persons of the West couldn’t analyse it as a single monistic culture.

Due to its profound vastness, to understand it clearly, the Western scholars divided Hinduism in four parts:





Actually these all four isms are not separate from each other originally.

If one peruses all these four isms s/he can easily find that all of these four isms have a common origin.

And that common origin is the original vast Hinduism according to Ved.

Believe it or not, but the facts speak for themselves and none can deny them without detrimenting him/her-self.


1.  Commentary on Ved

2. More On Hinduism

3. On Islam

4. On History

5. Science Fiction

6.  Creative Adult Sex in English from Durgesh

7. Durgesh in Hindi/Urdu

Utkrāmātah purush māvpatthā: Step up from here, O man, fall not down

Utkrāmātah purush māvpatthā:

Step up from here, O man,

fall not down

DSM Satyarthi

This mantrānsh is very important to follow in our daily behaviour/daily routine.

The fastly failing Western Business Culture is unable to save humankind.

In its infinite greed to get material success it has compromised with feminism to the extent it’s destructive to the entire human race.

It has advertised too much that the mankind always oppressed womankind.

It was mostly true, but not in Hindus.

It was true in non Hindus only.

The nescience/Vr’tratv has its own death in its very existence.

It was unfortunate for Western Culture that when feminism was fighting for its survival, Frederick Engels had written his now worldwide famous book: ‘The origin of the Family, Private Property and the State’.

The Communists advertised this book to their best capacity.

The persons who believed in the necessity of family were already fighting with Feminism, Atheism and Communism.

They couldn’t face successfully this new attack on the family.

The ever selfish ever shrewd businesspersons took advantage of this incapacity of the persons who wanted to protect their family.

They used this new weapon ‘The origin of the Family, Private Property and the State’, Feminism, Atheism and Communism too with their extraordinary financial power.

The Feminism had already destroyed the basic faith of womankind in family.

The then non Hindu societies were really oppressing their womankind keeping them uneducated mostly.

The non Hindu womankind, consequently, was already fighting against their own oppressor mankind.

They fell in the ever selfish ever shrewd network of the then immoral Businesspersons.

Men and women were not supplementary to each other any more.

They were enemies mutually.

The womankind opposed the protection from her mankind calling it their oppression as the Businesspersons suggested to them to use their womankind for modelling and thus enhancing the sales of their products.

Both the mankind and womankind must understand this shrewd conspiracy of the Businesspersons against their family.

Until and unless they don’t do it, none can stop the ultimate destruction of their family.


More from DSM Satyarthi:

1.  Commentary on Ved

2. More On Hinduism

3. On Islam

4. On History

5. Science Fiction

6.  Creative Adult Sex in English from Durgesh

7. Durgesh in Hindi/Urdu


One more Meer Jåfar Muftī Shamīm Kāzmī

One more Meer Jåfar

Muftī Shamīm Kāzmī

DSM Satyarthi

Ultimately, Indian National Congress has succeeded in finding one more Meer Jåfar to fight against the Secular Indians.

Our UPA government dramatizes it heavily that it is the only secular political organization that should rule India despite the countless scams of countless rupees it has allowed blindly to go on in its hateful administration.

It hopes the Indian citizens must be blind to its countless loot and still let it complete its five years term.


So that it can loot India more?

Team Anna is constantly fighting against it.

To fight against Team Anna, Indian National Congress has gone to every undemocratic means.

First, it sent its shameless spy Slave Agnivesh.

Yes, they call him Swami.

But his activities have always proved him not to be a Swami.

Instead, his activities have always proved him to be a purchased loyal slave of Indian National Congress.

Slave Agnivesh was the Jaichand of Team Anna.

He spied shamelessly  in Team Anna for ever-undemocratic ever antiHindus Indian National Congress.

Now, Muftī Shamīm Kāzmī has proved to be one more Meer Jåfar.

He has argued that Muslim Interest is different from fighting against Corruption and Black Money.

Is it true?

Are Muslims sharing the loot of India with the Scammers and Black Money Holders?

Muftī Shamīm Kāzmī has claimed that it is the case.

I certainly invite the views of other Indian Muslims too.


1.  Commentary on Ved

2. More On Hinduism

3. On Islam

4. On History

5. Science Fiction

6.  Creative Adult Sex in English from Durgesh

7. Durgesh in Hindi/Urdu