Should we really ban Islam?

Should we really ban Islam?

DSM Satyarthi

‘Islam is a cult.

It is time to wake up and realize that this cult is a threat to mankind and there can be no co-existence with Muslims.

As long as Muslims believe in Muhammad, they are a threat to others and to themselves.

Muslims must either leave Islam, discard their culture of hate and join the rest of mankind as fellow humans, or non-Muslims must separate themselves from them, ban Islam, end the immigration of Muslims and send home those who plot against democracy and refuse to integrate.’

 

These are the words, word by word, written by Dr. Ali Sina in his most important book, ‘Understanding Muħammad: A Psychobiography of Allah’s prophet’ on page 7.

I won’t go in the useless time consuming discussion whether Dr. Ali Sina is right or Islam.

I want to discuss here about the solutions of Dr. Ali Sina he has proposed to get rid of the problems the entire humanity is facing, due to Islam, in his well-perused opinion.

I promise not to deviate from it, unless it isn’t utmost necessary.

 

Dr. Ali Sina’s solutions are:

Firstly, Muslims must leave Islam, discard their culture of hate and join the rest of mankind as fellow humans.

Isn’t it against Democracy not to let Muslims decide what they themselves must do?

Of course, we can’t, and we shouldn’t ever, let any human society, Muslims or someone else whosoever, to have a culture of hate against any human group whatsoever.

Yet, should we do it by banning that particular society or by teaching and punishing her if she still acts against humanity?

We should never forget, as for as India is concerned, Indian Muslims have contributed to make present Indian society in a very big manner.

They never hated their fellow citizens Hindus as we find in other countries.

If they had, India couldn’t have been a Hindu Majority country still now.

Even the too much-fussed Two Nation Theory of Muħammad Ålī Jinnah could not make entire Musalmīn to leave India and go to Pakistan.

Can anyone say today that Indian Musalmīn don’t love India, instead they love Pakistan more?

Why Dr. Ali Sina’s theory that Islam itself is a culture of hate never worked in India?

 

It isn’t a simple question to be ignored in a general way.

Instead, I claim it’s the utmost important question that must be answered before planning any campaign to abolish Islam herself from everywhere.

 

Why Dr. Ali Sina’s theory that Islam itself is a culture of hate never worked in India?

Islam was always one of the most popular ideologies in India in Hindus even.

The Hindus go to Ajmer Sharīf more, than even the Musalmīn do.

Isn’t it a fact?

Apply Dr. Ali Sina’s theory that Islam itself is a culture of hate and explain this phenomenon in India.

You can’t avoid it.

You can’t ignore it ever.

 

Isn’t it a fact that the first holy war of Independence of India was fought in 1857 under the leadership of the great Mughal Emperor, Bahādur Shah Zafar?

If Hindus were hated by the Musalmīn and had really suffered in their rule, why the hell they wanted to establish Muslim rule against the then East India Company rule?

Why their leader wasn’t some Hindu, instead of Bahādur Shah Zafar?

 

Shouldn’t Dr. Ali Sina and his co authors explain this historical phenomenon in India?

 

Dr. Ali Sina’s second proposed solution to the Pseudo Islamic terrorism is:

Non-Muslims must separate themselves from Muslims, ban Islam, end the immigration of Muslims and send home those who plot against democracy and refuse to integrate.’

It is exactly what was done in Partition of India.

Non Muslims didn’t separate themselves from Muslims, but the Pseudo Musalmīn then themselves separated from then Hindus.

Somewhat the same thing is still being done by present day Pseudo Musalmīn everywhere.

It isn’t even needed now for Non Musalmīn to separate Muslims from them.

The ever stupid Pseudo Musalmīn are already doing it themselves everywhere and deliberately, either clandestinely or openly, conspiring against Non Muslims, plotting terrorist activities against them.

These ever stupid Pseudo Musalmīn are not creative, not productive, neither they want to be ever.

They even don’t understand no human society can survive herself if she isn’t creative and productive.

They only want to kill the Non Muslims so that they themselves can get Jannat.

Does Islam really preach this ever anti-human doctrine?

 

Dr. Ali Sina and his co authors say ‘Yes’.

Yet, the learned persons who have really perused Islam without any bias, say ‘No, Certainly Not’.

Al Qur’an Al Karīm says:

Muħammadurrasūlullāhi.

Wallazīn måhu Ashiddao Ǻlā alkuffāri ruħmāo baynahum.’

Muħammad is the Messenger of Allah.

And those with him are severe against Al Kuffār, Merciful among themselves.’

Al Qur’an Al Karīm : 48 Al Fatħ| 29

Pseudo Musalmīn terrorists and criminal/criminal minded Pseudo Musalmīn have interpreted this āyat-e-Karīmah in their favor that this āyat-e-Karīmah orders them to kill the non Musalmīn.

They go ahead further and quote one more āyat from Al Qur’an Al Karīm to support their vile interests:

Fa qatulū almusharikīn

ħaisu wajadttumūhum.’

 Then kill the associators

wherever you find them.

Al Qur’an Al Kareem: 9 Attawbah|5

 

Well, it’s the interpretation Yazīd MalåūnǺrab

Burdāfaroshs and their supporters Mullahs and Maulavīs allotted to it

They damn cared if this interpretation of this āyat-e-Karīmah is against Al Qur’an Al Kareem itself.*

 

The Pseudo Musalmīn terrorists and criminal/criminal minded Pseudo Musalmīn keep repeating only two āyat-e-karīmahs:

Muħammadurrasūlullāhi.

Wallazīn måhu Ashiddao Ǻlā alkuffāri ruħmāo baynahum.’

Muħammad is the Messenger of Allah.

And those with him are severe against Al Kuffār, Merciful among themselves.’

Al Qur’an Al Karīm : 48 Al Fatħ| 29

 ‘Fa qatulū almusharikīn

ħaisu wajadttumūhum’

Then kill the associators

wherever you find them

 —Al Qur’an Al Kareem: 9 Attawbah|5

They keep repeating these two āyat-e-karīmahs as if the entire Islam is centralized on these two āyat-e-karīmahs.

Is it true?

Anyone who has really perused Islam without any bias, without any prejudice, can tell everyone it isn’t.

Isn’t it a negative approach of these PseudoMusalmīn terrorists and criminal/criminal minded PseudoMusalmīn to their own religion if their claim is taken prima facie?

 

Now, let’s analyze their claim itself.

How many PseudoMusalmīn terrorists and criminal/criminal minded Pseudo Musalmīn are there in the entire Ummat-eMuslimah?

51%?

More?

49%?

Less?

What about the rest of the Musalmīn who aren’t Pseudo Musalmīn terrorists and criminal/criminal minded Pseudo Musalmīn, neither they ever were?

Why should they suffer for something they haven’t done ever?

Because their fellow religionists did it?

Is it justice to them?

 

What the hell we want?

To face their injustice with our own injustice?

Then how the hell are we better than Pseudo Musalmīn terrorists and criminal/criminal minded Pseudo Musalmīn?

Can’t we really teach them humanity?

Can’t even we punish them if they refuse to learn?

The entire humankind can’t do it?

Are the Pseudo Musalmīn terrorists and criminal/criminal minded PseudoMusalmīn so much large in number?

Are they so much capable in resources even?

Isn’t what I propose more justified, more rational, more logical, more practical and more human?

 

Why compel even the Musalmīn that believe in humanity to join these inhuman PseudoMusalmīn terrorists and criminal/criminal minded Pseudo Musalmīn?

 

Isn’t that’s what you are proposing to do?

 

Even if I believe, though I can’t be so insane ever to believe it, what you say:

Every Musalmān is a terrorist or a potential terrorist.’

Isn’t it smarter to break the unity of our common enemy?

If a large number of such Musalmīn claim they aren’t with these wretched animals, the Pseudo Musalmīn terrorists and criminal/criminal minded Pseudo Musalmīn, why shouldn’t we take advantage of it?

Why should we send them too to our enemy’s camp?

To strengthen our enemy’s capability to fight with us more effectively?

Must be us so stupid?

I don’t think so.

I can’t even imagine to think as stupid as it’s being proposed.

———————————————————-

Islam according to Ved

More from DSM Satyarthi:

1. On Islam

2. On History

3.  Commentary on Ved

4. More On Hinduism

5. Science Fiction

6.  Creative Adult Sex in English from Durgesh

7. Durgesh in Hindi/Urdu

Al Muħammad Al Qāsim’s utmost greedy relatives

Al Muħammad Al Qāsim’s

 utmost greedy relatives

  1.    Al Nadīm Al Quddūs Al Muħammad Al Qāsim’ half/real brother
  2.     Al Safiyah Al Ghaus Al Nadīm Al Quddūs’s awfully stunning wife, a mastermind, ex hostess of Las Vegas Nevada gambling house, the real brain power against Al Waħīdah Al Tawīd and Al Muħammad Al Qāsim.
  3.        Al Zakiyah Al Qāsim, Al Muħammad Al Qāsim’s sister
  4.          Vikram Bachhalyā, Al Zakiyah Al Qāsim’s husband
  5.           Al Lubnā Al Qāsim, Al Muħammad Al Qāsim’s one more sister
  6.           Pratāp Bachhalyā, Al Lubnā Al Qāsim’s husband
  7.          Al Hudā Al Qāsim Al Hāshmī, their advocate
  8.          Naåīmah Muħammad Ħasan, Al Safiyah Al Ghaus’s friend, philosopher and guide
  9. Naåīmah Muħammad Ħasan’s Seven Movements

—————————————————————

1. More Creative Adult Sex in English from Durgesh

2.Durgesh in Hindi/Urdu

3. Science Fiction

4. On History

5. Commentary on Ved

6. On Hinduism

7. On Islam

Māmékam Sharañam Vraj: Follow me exclusively :1

Sarvdharmān parityajý,

Māmékam Sharañam Vraj

Denouncing everything else,

Follow me exclusively

DSM Satyarthi

The Father 

Janmdātā

Prologue

Chapter 1

 Kr’shñ Draupadī

I smiled.

“Who else is here?”

“You can’t run away from me. I’ll never let you.”

I looked at Draupadī gravely.

Draupadī,…”

“’Kr’shñā’.” Draupadī interrupted me, “’Kr’shñasý patnī’, ‘Wife of Kr’shñ, ‘Kr’shñā’. I told you so many times.”

“Yes, I have seen now that even Pitr’vý Shrī, Drupad Uncle, is calling you, ‘Kr’shñā’.”

“That’s why he has invited you here, with your elder brother. Your father was too invited separately. Now since he has also come…”

“I don’t think my ‘Sakhī’, my girlfriend, doesn’t understand me enough to comprehend, she has to change herself for it.”

Draupadī laughed.

“How can you make to marry you conditional for us womankind?”

“I am not making conditional to marry me, you have yourself made it conditional to marry you. I am only responding to it.”

“Oh, I’ve made my marriage conditional? Consequently, you are justified in making your own marriage conditional too? Aren’t you denying our birthright thus?”

“I don’t think Āchārý Droñ deserves the punishment Pitr’vý Shrī, Drupad Uncle, has vowed for him.”

“I see.”

“You must have seen it far more before.” I muttered somewhat curtly.

“What? What did you say?” Draupadī was all-alert suddenly.

I smiled.

Draupadī was more emotional than my other Sakhīs, my other girlfriends.

“You must have seen it before you vowed to marry only the man who could kill Āchārý Droñ.”

“You won’t do it?”

“Never.”

“You think Uncle Droñ was right?”

“Certainly not. Nevertheless, Pitr’vý Shrī, Drupad Uncle, is himself not right that he vowed to kill Āchārý Droñ.”

“I don’t agree with you.”

“Why not? Didn’t you yourself kill even your own maternal uncle, Rāxasrāj Kans, because he arrested your parents illegally inhumanly? What you did is right, and it’s wrong if I do the same thing? I never imagined, even you have such a double standard.”*

I smiled.

“I appreciate your efforts to woo me, despite your vowed declaration that you would marry only the man who would kill Āchārý Droñ.”

“I am your wife already. “‘Kr’shñasý patnī, ‘Wife of Kr’shñ, ‘Kr’shñā. ‘Brahmcharyéñ kanyā’ yuwānam vindaté patim’, notPatih vindaté patnīm’.”

“Well, of course, I can’t stop any adult Yong woman to opt me her husband. Nevertheless, she can’t impose on me her own absurd ethics and/or her own absurd morals.”

“I don’t agree with you that my ethics and morals are absurd.”

“I know. That’s why I can’t marry you unless you won’t impose on me that I have to kill Āchārý Droñ.”

“He thinks Pānchāl is my father’s personal property that can be distributed between my father and Āchārý Droñ himself. It’s not Hinduism. It’s not Democracy. Āchārý Droñ is a yātudhān. He deserves to be awarded with death sentence for his yātudhānatv.”

I smiled.

Draupadī,…”

Kr’shñā.” Draupadī interrupted me.

Kr’shñā,” I didn’t argue with her, “Death Sentence is the extreme sentence Ved suggests. We Hindus almost always try to avoid it.”

“Yet you killed your own maternal uncle yourself. Didn’t you?”

“Oh sure. With my fist. Didn’t I?”

“What do you mean?”

“If I really wanted to kill my maternal uncle, I would have prepared for it.”

“I still didn’t understand.” Draupadī looked at me quite perplexed.

“I would have using some weapon to kill him deliberately already, if I really wanted to kill him.”

“I see.” Draupadī smiled understandingly, “So you want to claim now that it was an accident that Kans was killed by you?”

“I wanted to arrest him alive and keep him as a prisoner for rest of his life as he kept my parents and my maternal grandfather in prison.” I said gravely.*

Draupadī laughed.

“Bosh and nonsense.”

“I know you can’t believe me.”

“Nobody will believe you.”

“I don’t blame anybody.” I said indifferently, “Usually the people think it’s justified if you kill someone if he had imprisoned your parents.”

Draupadī grimaced.

Rāxasrāj Kans hadn’t only imprisoned your parents. He imprisoned your maternal grandfather too. He was immensely against Democracy. He was a local tool of the utmost successful imperialist of today, Jarāsandh.”

“Sure,” I agreed with Draupadī, “I agree with you. But the question is should we Hindus kill every imperialist, and every human tool of an imperialist too?”

“Why not?” Draupadī asked curtly, “Don’t they kill us?”

“‘Māyābhirindr māyinam’?”

“Why not?”

“Oh, come on, Draupadī,…”

Kr’shñā,”

Kr’shñā, you know better.”

“I don’t.” Draupadī said doggedly.

“Yes, you do.” I too myself said insistently, “What I did, I did in self defense. I wasn’t executing death sentence on him. Neither the Ved Mantr ‘Māyābhirindr māyinam’ is as simple as you are implying it to be.”*

 Chapter 2

———————————————————————————————

More from DSM Satyarthi:

1.  Commentary on Ved

2. More On Hinduism

3. On Islam

4. On History

5. Science Fiction

6.  Creative Adult Sex in English from Durgesh

7. Durgesh in Hindi/Urdu

Ashiddao Ǻlā alkuffāri ruħmāo baynahum

Ashiddao Ǻlā alkuffāri

ruħmāo baynahum

Severe against Kuffār

Merciful among themselves

DSM Satyarthi

Al Qur’an Al Kareem Sūrat Al Fataħ 48:29 states:

Muħammadurrasūlullāhi.

Wallazīn måhu Ashiddao Ǻlā alkuffāri ruħmāo baynahum.’

Muħammad is the Messenger of Allah.

And those with him are severe against Al Kuffār, Merciful among themselves.’

Musalmān terrorists and criminal/criminal

minded Musalmīn have interpreted this āyat-e-Karīmah in their favor that this āyat-e-Karīmah orders them to kill the non Musalmīn.

Well, it’s the interpretation Yazīd Malåūn, Ǻrab Burdāfaroshs and their supporters Mullahs and Maulavīs allotted to it.

They damn cared if this interpretation of this āyat-e-Karīmah is against Al Qur’an Al Kareem itself.

——————————————————————————–

More from DSM Satyarthi:

1. On Islam

2. On History

3.  Commentary on Ved

4. More On Hinduism

5. Science Fiction

6.  Creative Adult Sex in English from Durgesh

7. Durgesh in Hindi/Urdu

Utkrāmātah purush māvpatthā: Step up from here, O man, fall not down

Utkrāmātah purush māvpatthā:

Step up from here, O man,

fall not down

DSM Satyarthi

This mantrānsh is very important to follow in our daily behaviour/daily routine.

The fastly failing Western Business Culture is unable to save humankind.

In its infinite greed to get material success it has compromised with feminism to the extent it’s destructive to the entire human race.

It has advertised too much that the mankind always oppressed womankind.

It was mostly true, but not in Hindus.

It was true in non Hindus only.

The nescience/Vr’tratv has its own death in its very existence.

It was unfortunate for Western Culture that when feminism was fighting for its survival, Frederick Engels had written his now worldwide famous book: ‘The origin of the Family, Private Property and the State’.

The Communists advertised this book to their best capacity.

The persons who believed in the necessity of family were already fighting with Feminism, Atheism and Communism.

They couldn’t face successfully this new attack on the family.

The ever selfish ever shrewd businesspersons took advantage of this incapacity of the persons who wanted to protect their family.

They used this new weapon ‘The origin of the Family, Private Property and the State’, Feminism, Atheism and Communism too with their extraordinary financial power.

The Feminism had already destroyed the basic faith of womankind in family.

The then non Hindu societies were really oppressing their womankind keeping them uneducated mostly.

The non Hindu womankind, consequently, was already fighting against their own oppressor mankind.

They fell in the ever selfish ever shrewd network of the then immoral Businesspersons.

Men and women were not supplementary to each other any more.

They were enemies mutually.

The womankind opposed the protection from her mankind calling it their oppression as the Businesspersons suggested to them to use their womankind for modelling and thus enhancing the sales of their products.

Both the mankind and womankind must understand this shrewd conspiracy of the Businesspersons against their family.

Until and unless they don’t do it, none can stop the ultimate destruction of their family.

 ———————————————————————————

More from DSM Satyarthi:

1.  Commentary on Ved

2. More On Hinduism

3. On Islam

4. On History

5. Science Fiction

6.  Creative Adult Sex in English from Durgesh

7. Durgesh in Hindi/Urdu

 

One more Meer Jåfar Muftī Shamīm Kāzmī

One more Meer Jåfar

Muftī Shamīm Kāzmī

DSM Satyarthi

Ultimately, Indian National Congress has succeeded in finding one more Meer Jåfar to fight against the Secular Indians.

Our UPA government dramatizes it heavily that it is the only secular political organization that should rule India despite the countless scams of countless rupees it has allowed blindly to go on in its hateful administration.

It hopes the Indian citizens must be blind to its countless loot and still let it complete its five years term.

Why?

So that it can loot India more?

Team Anna is constantly fighting against it.

To fight against Team Anna, Indian National Congress has gone to every undemocratic means.

First, it sent its shameless spy Slave Agnivesh.

Yes, they call him Swami.

But his activities have always proved him not to be a Swami.

Instead, his activities have always proved him to be a purchased loyal slave of Indian National Congress.

Slave Agnivesh was the Jaichand of Team Anna.

He spied shamelessly  in Team Anna for ever-undemocratic ever antiHindus Indian National Congress.

Now, Muftī Shamīm Kāzmī has proved to be one more Meer Jåfar.

He has argued that Muslim Interest is different from fighting against Corruption and Black Money.

Is it true?

Are Muslims sharing the loot of India with the Scammers and Black Money Holders?

Muftī Shamīm Kāzmī has claimed that it is the case.

I certainly invite the views of other Indian Muslims too.

 ———————————————————————————

1.  Commentary on Ved

2. More On Hinduism

3. On Islam

4. On History

5. Science Fiction

6.  Creative Adult Sex in English from Durgesh

7. Durgesh in Hindi/Urdu

Never mistake it: It’s Suicidal

Never mistake it

It’s Suicidal

DSM Satyarthi

Some writers are quite mistaken due to their western, self-imposed blindness.

The Western Culture is actually a Business Culture.

Consequently, it’s natural that Humanity, Morals and Ethics are always secondary for it.

Of Course, it doesn’t accept it in so many words.

Who did accept his/her suicidal mistakes ever?

Everyone longs for his/her own survival, and why shouldn’t s(/h)e?

I’ve already commented on the subject:

The mental slavery of the English-educated Indians’.

I’ve said in the article:

‘This erroneous westerner view is entirely baseless.’

Actually, the western culture is doing the same mistake now, once HinduismPersianism,JudaismChristianityIslam and even the Communism did.

The history stands to evidence that once all these six global conquerors did this mistake, they could not survive.

We must try to understand this everfatal, suicidal, historical mistake that kills a dominant culture gradually ultimately.

The western culture is listing itself on its seventh place.

Soon we’d say:

‘Actually, the xxxxxxx culture is doing the same mistake now, once Hinduism, Persianism, Judaism, Christianity, Islam, Communism and even the western culture did.’

Let’s analyze what this everfatal, suicidal, historical mistake is.

Ved/Eishān Param Brahm Paramātmā instructs us to concentrate on two principles and never to forget them:

Yet, we forgot them.

The principles are:

1. ‘Dhiyo yo nah prachodayāt’.

2. ‘Yāthātathyatah’.

We forgot them.

The Hindus were ruling the globe then:

‘The wonder that was India’.

Hinduism says:

‘As nar nahin janmeu jag māhīn,

Prabhutā pāi jāhi mad nāhīn.’

‘No such person has taken birth in the Multiverse that has got the sovereignty and hasn’t become mad.’

—Shri Rāmcharit Mānas

We forgot the admonition of Eishān Param Brahm Paramātmā/VED to us, and refused to understand the facts the Persians had realized then and requesting us to act accordingly:

1. ‘Dhiyo yo nah prachodayāt’.

2. ‘Yāthātathyatah’.

We refused to see that those are the facts actually.

What happened?

The Constitution of the Creations, Ved, worked.

It was never biased in the favor of Pseudo-Hindus.

We lost our power gradually ultimately to the Persians.

Why?

Because, now the Persians were following the two principles practically, and we were NOT:

1. ‘Dhiyo yo nah prachodayāt’.

2. ‘Yāthātathyatah’.

We thought we are Hindus whether we practice Ved actually or not.

The constitution of the Creations did not recognize our such authority.

It refused our victory, recognizing that of the Persians.

Why?

Had the Ved failed?

No.

Certainly not.

It decided in the favor of Persians, because the Persians followed the two Principlesdiscussed above:

1. ‘Dhiyo yo nah prachodayāt’.

2. ‘Yāthātathyatah’.

They did not have their names in Vedic Sanskr’t.

They had their own language that was a distortion of Vedic Sanskr’t.

They called it Persian.

They had their names in it.

Pseudo Hinduism was defeated and the actual Hinduism won.

Persians replaced Pseudo Hindus in leading the globe.

Unfortunately, even the Persians forgot the fact why and how did they win over the so-called Hindus then.

It was remembered till the original winners lived.

It did not last forever.

Their children and the children of their children, eventually, replaced them.

They were taught the wrong history.

They were not told the fact that their ancestors won on Hindus due to the mistakes of then Hindus.

They were told that their ancestors were great persons.

It always does happen, as if it’s an immortal law.

Every person, who is interested in studying how a culture is replaced by the next,must understand that it happens due to the mistakes of heirs of the successful persons.

Enjoying success of their forefathers/ancestors, their successors gradually forget how their forefathers/ancestors had achieved it.

No success is achieved ever, by anyone, by enjoying life only.

Enjoying life is an absolutely different thing from achieving success.

It’s one thing to get success, it’s quite another thing to live and keep it.

The successors of the achievers forget it.

They forget how the success was achieved, what hard work had been done to get it, and what sacrifices have been made.

They act very irresponsibly, and lose what their forefathers/ancestors achieved through anon stop chain of hard work and sacrifices.

The westerners are also suffering from the same process.

The word ‘Meditation’ does not come from Indo-European root med-, meaning “to measure”, as it’s claimed.

It comes from Vedic Sanskr’t Dhātu/root/verb ‘Médhr’ sangamé ch’ (Bhvādigañ 601), meaning ‘synchronization’.

The word ‘Médhā’, in Vedic Sansskr’t, is itself derived from this Vedic Sanskr’t Dhātu/root/verb ‘Médhr’ sangamé ch’ (Bhvādigañ 601), meaning ‘synchronization’.

According to ‘Mādhavīyā Dhātuvr’ttih’,  the word ‘Médhā’ is ‘Bhidāditvādang’(Bhvādigañ 601).

I strongly advise to put down the suicidal mistake, pointed out here in quite detail, and get the correct information.

Ved is Not in the Vedmantrs we recite

 ———————————————————————————

1.  Commentary on Ved

2. More On Hinduism

3. On Islam

4. On History

5. Science Fiction

6.  Creative Adult Sex in English from Durgesh

7. Durgesh in Hindi/Urdu