Al Muħammad Al Qāsim’s utmost greedy relatives

Al Muħammad Al Qāsim’s

 utmost greedy relatives

  1.    Al Nadīm Al Quddūs Al Muħammad Al Qāsim’ half/real brother
  2.     Al Safiyah Al Ghaus Al Nadīm Al Quddūs’s awfully stunning wife, a mastermind, ex hostess of Las Vegas Nevada gambling house, the real brain power against Al Waħīdah Al Tawīd and Al Muħammad Al Qāsim.
  3.        Al Zakiyah Al Qāsim, Al Muħammad Al Qāsim’s sister
  4.          Vikram Bachhalyā, Al Zakiyah Al Qāsim’s husband
  5.           Al Lubnā Al Qāsim, Al Muħammad Al Qāsim’s one more sister
  6.           Pratāp Bachhalyā, Al Lubnā Al Qāsim’s husband
  7.          Al Hudā Al Qāsim Al Hāshmī, their advocate
  8.          Naåīmah Muħammad Ħasan, Al Safiyah Al Ghaus’s friend, philosopher and guide
  9. Naåīmah Muħammad Ħasan’s Seven Movements

—————————————————————

1. More Creative Adult Sex in English from Durgesh

2.Durgesh in Hindi/Urdu

3. Science Fiction

4. On History

5. Commentary on Ved

6. On Hinduism

7. On Islam

Māmékam Sharañam Vraj: Follow me exclusively :1

Sarvdharmān parityajý,

Māmékam Sharañam Vraj

Denouncing everything else,

Follow me exclusively

DSM Satyarthi

The Father 

Janmdātā

Prologue

Chapter 1

 Kr’shñ Draupadī

I smiled.

“Who else is here?”

“You can’t run away from me. I’ll never let you.”

I looked at Draupadī gravely.

Draupadī,…”

“’Kr’shñā’.” Draupadī interrupted me, “’Kr’shñasý patnī’, ‘Wife of Kr’shñ, ‘Kr’shñā’. I told you so many times.”

“Yes, I have seen now that even Pitr’vý Shrī, Drupad Uncle, is calling you, ‘Kr’shñā’.”

“That’s why he has invited you here, with your elder brother. Your father was too invited separately. Now since he has also come…”

“I don’t think my ‘Sakhī’, my girlfriend, doesn’t understand me enough to comprehend, she has to change herself for it.”

Draupadī laughed.

“How can you make to marry you conditional for us womankind?”

“I am not making conditional to marry me, you have yourself made it conditional to marry you. I am only responding to it.”

“Oh, I’ve made my marriage conditional? Consequently, you are justified in making your own marriage conditional too? Aren’t you denying our birthright thus?”

“I don’t think Āchārý Droñ deserves the punishment Pitr’vý Shrī, Drupad Uncle, has vowed for him.”

“I see.”

“You must have seen it far more before.” I muttered somewhat curtly.

“What? What did you say?” Draupadī was all-alert suddenly.

I smiled.

Draupadī was more emotional than my other Sakhīs, my other girlfriends.

“You must have seen it before you vowed to marry only the man who could kill Āchārý Droñ.”

“You won’t do it?”

“Never.”

“You think Uncle Droñ was right?”

“Certainly not. Nevertheless, Pitr’vý Shrī, Drupad Uncle, is himself not right that he vowed to kill Āchārý Droñ.”

“I don’t agree with you.”

“Why not? Didn’t you yourself kill even your own maternal uncle, Rāxasrāj Kans, because he arrested your parents illegally inhumanly? What you did is right, and it’s wrong if I do the same thing? I never imagined, even you have such a double standard.”*

I smiled.

“I appreciate your efforts to woo me, despite your vowed declaration that you would marry only the man who would kill Āchārý Droñ.”

“I am your wife already. “‘Kr’shñasý patnī, ‘Wife of Kr’shñ, ‘Kr’shñā. ‘Brahmcharyéñ kanyā’ yuwānam vindaté patim’, notPatih vindaté patnīm’.”

“Well, of course, I can’t stop any adult Yong woman to opt me her husband. Nevertheless, she can’t impose on me her own absurd ethics and/or her own absurd morals.”

“I don’t agree with you that my ethics and morals are absurd.”

“I know. That’s why I can’t marry you unless you won’t impose on me that I have to kill Āchārý Droñ.”

“He thinks Pānchāl is my father’s personal property that can be distributed between my father and Āchārý Droñ himself. It’s not Hinduism. It’s not Democracy. Āchārý Droñ is a yātudhān. He deserves to be awarded with death sentence for his yātudhānatv.”

I smiled.

Draupadī,…”

Kr’shñā.” Draupadī interrupted me.

Kr’shñā,” I didn’t argue with her, “Death Sentence is the extreme sentence Ved suggests. We Hindus almost always try to avoid it.”

“Yet you killed your own maternal uncle yourself. Didn’t you?”

“Oh sure. With my fist. Didn’t I?”

“What do you mean?”

“If I really wanted to kill my maternal uncle, I would have prepared for it.”

“I still didn’t understand.” Draupadī looked at me quite perplexed.

“I would have using some weapon to kill him deliberately already, if I really wanted to kill him.”

“I see.” Draupadī smiled understandingly, “So you want to claim now that it was an accident that Kans was killed by you?”

“I wanted to arrest him alive and keep him as a prisoner for rest of his life as he kept my parents and my maternal grandfather in prison.” I said gravely.*

Draupadī laughed.

“Bosh and nonsense.”

“I know you can’t believe me.”

“Nobody will believe you.”

“I don’t blame anybody.” I said indifferently, “Usually the people think it’s justified if you kill someone if he had imprisoned your parents.”

Draupadī grimaced.

Rāxasrāj Kans hadn’t only imprisoned your parents. He imprisoned your maternal grandfather too. He was immensely against Democracy. He was a local tool of the utmost successful imperialist of today, Jarāsandh.”

“Sure,” I agreed with Draupadī, “I agree with you. But the question is should we Hindus kill every imperialist, and every human tool of an imperialist too?”

“Why not?” Draupadī asked curtly, “Don’t they kill us?”

“‘Māyābhirindr māyinam’?”

“Why not?”

“Oh, come on, Draupadī,…”

Kr’shñā,”

Kr’shñā, you know better.”

“I don’t.” Draupadī said doggedly.

“Yes, you do.” I too myself said insistently, “What I did, I did in self defense. I wasn’t executing death sentence on him. Neither the Ved Mantr ‘Māyābhirindr māyinam’ is as simple as you are implying it to be.”*

 Chapter 2

———————————————————————————————

More from DSM Satyarthi:

1.  Commentary on Ved

2. More On Hinduism

3. On Islam

4. On History

5. Science Fiction

6.  Creative Adult Sex in English from Durgesh

7. Durgesh in Hindi/Urdu

Dév Ānand to Amitābh Bachchan

Dév Ānand to Amitābh

Bachchan

DSM Satyarthi

Generally, the media presents the Indian Cine History keeping the box office into its central point of view.

Of course, if the commercial point of view is taken into consideration, it’s necessary.

But why should there a Multiversalist Humanist, as I am, study the same from commercial point of view?

I don’t.

I never.

Instead, moreover, I refuse to do so.

Instead, I study it, as I peruse everything else too, with the point of view to its worth to humanity.

I think we human beings should peruse everything with the same point of view.

So, I think Dév Ānand and Rāj Kapoor have contributed to humanity more than our tragedy king Dilip Kumar has.

The media writes Dilip Dév Raj trio.

I write Dév Raj Dilip trio.

I keep Dilip at the third place, not because I’m communal.

I put Sāħir Ludhiyānvī at the top when I write about Indian cine lyricists.

How was it possible if I were a communal?

I put Jāvéd Akħtar after Sāħir Ludhiyānvī even, not Ānand Baxī.

How was it possible if I were a communal?

I put Dr. APJ Abdul Kalām at the top when I write about the Presidents of India, not any Hindu whosoever he may be.

How was it possible if I were a communal?

No, I’m not communal.

I hate communalism instead.

From a humanist point of view, Dév Ānand and Rāj Kapoor have contributed to humanity more than Dilip Kumar has.

Of course, Dilip Kumar has contributed to box office more than Dév Ānand and Rāj Kapoor have.

But to humanity, Dilip Kumar has contributed less.

Tragedy clicked at the box office, those days, instead of the highest jubilant attitude of great Dév Ānand towards life and the highest constructive attitude of great Raj Kapoor towards the same, because most of the Indians those days were sufferers.

India had gotten its independence recently.

The sufferers identified themselves with Dilip Kumar’s tragedies more than with the highest jubilant attitude of great Dév Ānand towards life and the highest constructive attitude of great Raj Kapoor towards the same.

Divine Rajendr Kumar was out of question consequently then, even irrespective of his being Jubilee Kumar.

Even Sophisticated Ashok Kumar and Raj Kumar had lost at box office to the tragedies of Dilip Kumar.

The sufferers kept identifying themselves with the tragedies of Dilip Kumar.

Yet, as India progressed, the sufferers lost their majority.

It was the reason the tragedies of Dilip Kumar started to flop ultimately.

The life survives in jubilation, elation, triumph, joyousness, delight and euphoria, not in tragedies.

It is the reason the highest jubilant attitude of great Dév Ānand towards life and the highest constructive attitude of great Raj Kapoor towards the same, survived on the tragedies of Dilip Kumar and is still surviving.

It was the reason the ever first super star Rajesh Khanna with all the highest jubilant attitude of great Dév Ānand towards life and the highest constructive attitude of great Raj Kapoor towards the same, even with the singer Kishore Kumar of Dév Ānand, soon replaced the tragedies of Dilip Kumar.

Rajesh Khanna had the great divinity of Rajendr Kumar and sophistication of Ashok Kumar and Raj Kumar too.

Dilip Kumar had no alternative to lose to Rajesh Khanna.

Yet, Rajesh Khanna too had the same loser morals of the tragedies of Dilip Kumar.

Dilip Kumar acknowledged and honoured the success of Rajesh Khanna using his singer Kishore Kumar himself in Sagina.

Rajesh Khanna was the super cocktail of the highest jubilant attitude of great Dév Ānand towards life, the highest constructive attitude of great Raj Kapoor, divinity of Rajendr Kumar and the tragedies of Dilip Kumar.

It was the mystery of the success of great Rajesh Khanna on the tragedies of Dilip Kumar.

Yet, he had the same loser ethics, the tragedies of our tragedy king Dilip Kumar had.

Amitabh Bachchan succeeded in getting rid of it too.

Hence, the ultimate defeat of great Rajesh Khanna to even greater Amitabh Bachchan.

Amitabh Bachchan as he rose taller and taller, the tallest ultimately, was never a loser even as Rajesh Khanna was.

—————————————————————————————————————————————

More audio musical blogs from DSM Satyarthi:

1. Zindagi, aa raha hoon main

2. Zindagi ik safar hai suhana

3. Jo tum hansoge

4. Har Chehrā yahān chānd to har zarrā sitarā

5. Main jahan chala jaaoon, bahaar chali aaye

6. Socha tha pyar hum na karenge

7. The Star of the millennium: Amitabh Bachchan

8. Man re, tu kaahe n’ dheer dhare?

Man ré tū kahé n’ dheer dharé?

Man ré tū kahé n’ dheer dharé?

an interesting audio musical blog:

Just listen to, and enjoy

Click the links to some popular songs, in an interesting specific sequence.

Enjoy the songs as if a different  video audio story, implying an alogether different sense:

DSM Satyarthi

  1. Jiski jhél si gahrī ānkhon mein mérā man doobā
  2. Ye reshmi zulfen ye sharbati ankhen
  3. Mainé dékhā tūné dékhā
  4. Duniyā karé sawāl to hum kyā jawāb dén?
  5. Zulfon ko aap yoon na sanwaara karo
  6. Man ré tū kahé n’ dheer dharé?
  7. Kahān tak ye man ko
  8. Kis Kāran kāminī sharmāyé?
  9. Kajra lagā ke bindiya saja ke
  10. Aap ké paas jo āyégā pighal jāyégā
  11. Tora Man darpañ kahlāyé
  12. Man ré tū hi batā kyā gāūn?
  13. Zindagī ittefāq hai
  14. Sun Champa Sun Tara
  15. Yūnhī tum mujhsé baat kartī ho
  16. Hamén unsé muħabbat hai, magar hum kah nahīn sakté
  17. Ae kaash kisī diwane ko
  18. Ye kali jab talaq phool bankar khile
  19. Shola ulfat kā bhadka ke
  20. Allah ye ada kaisī hai in hasinon mein
  21. Man pukāré ré
  22. Bindiya chamkegi
  23. Tumhen dékhā hai mainé gulsitan mein
  24. Dil jo na kah saka
  25. Humsafar mere humsafar
  26. Bechara dil kya kare
  27. Zohra Jamal
  28. Baghon mein bāhar hai
  29. Rangilā ré téré rang mein
  30. Tum to dil ké taar chhéđkar
  31. Chūđi nahīn ye mérā dil hai
  32. Dil hāyé mérā dil dil se dil mil gayā
  33. Pyār ki mujh pé kyā nazar daali
  34. Koi na téré pahlé thi na téré båd hogī
  35. Tūné O Rangīlé kaisā jādū kiyā?
  36. O Kehdo kehdo pyār ki hum tamanna jawān kar lén
  37. Yeh kaisā sur mandir hai
  38. Ānkhon mein humné āpké sapné sajāyé hain
  39. Allah Allah Ya Baba
  40. Allah Allah Allah voh le gayā chandi chhalla
  41. Chupké sé dil dé dé
  42. Husn-e-Iran O mérī jaan
  43. Méré dil mein tu hi tu hai
  44. Din dhal jāyé hāyé raat n’ jāyé
  45. Dukh aur sukh ké rāsté
  46. Zindagī hansné gāné ké liyé hai pal do pal
  47. Na tujhse door ja sakoon
  48. Bye bye Miss, good night, kal phir miléngé
  49. Méré nainā sāwan bhādon
  50. Suno kaho kuchh hua kya
  51. Mere naina sāwan bhādon
  52. Karvaŧén badalté rahé sārī rāt hum
  53. Aaj phir jīné kī tamannā hai
  54. Ŧhandī hawāon né gorī kā ghūnghaŧ uŧhā diyā
  55. Gātā rahé mérā dil
  56. N’ jāné kyā huā jo tūné chhoo liyā
  57. Tum nahīn mānogé
  58. Rastā dékhé térā vyākul man mérā
  59. Paas nahīn aanā
  60. Kiskā maħal hai? Kiskā yeh ghar hai?
  61. Méré dil né tađap ké jab naam térā pukārā
  62. Main tumsé pyār kartī hūn
  63. Sun lé zamīn āsmān
  64. Mīŧhī mīŧī bāton sé man bhar dé
  65. Maine tumko piya kah diya
  66. Prabhu téro naam jo dhyāyé sukh pāyé
  67. Zindagi ik safar hai suhānā
  68. Jhuk gaīn ānkhén
  69. O méré dil ké chain
  70. Likhā hai térī ānkhon mein kiska afsānah?
  71. Too lājawāb bémisāl dilbar yaar dilbar jānī
  72. Main téré pyār mein pāgal
  73. Rang bharé mausam sé rang churā ké
  74. Kuchh bhi na kahā aur kah bhi gayé
  75. Jai jai Shiv Shankar
  76. Man tađpat Hari darshan ko aaj
  77. Aao Kanhāī méré dhaam ki din sé ho gaī shaam
  78. Roop térā mastānā
  79. Ahle dil yūn bhī nibhā lété hain
  80. Pyār kā dard hai
  81. Kuchh to log kahéngé
  82. Aur kya aħde wafā hoté hain?
  83. Chingārī koī bhađké
  84. Aur kya aħde wafā hoté hain?
  85. Dekho O dīwāno tum yeh kaam na karo
  86. Om shaanti Om
  87. ——————————————————————————————
  88. More audio musical blogs from DSM Satyarthi:
  89. 1. Zindagi, aa raha hoon main
  90. 2. Zindagi ik safar hai suhana3. Jo tum hansoge4. Har Chehrā yahān chānd to har zarrā sitarā5. Main jahan chala jaaoon, bahaar chali aaye6. Socha tha pyar hum na karenge7. The Star of the millennium: Amitabh Bachchan
  91. 8. Man ré tū kahé n’ dhkr dharé?

Ved: 4 Atharv Ved: Kānd 14| Vivāh Kānd: Sookt 1| Mantr 2

Ved: Ved Bhāshý

4 Atharv Ved

 Kānd 14 Vivāh Kānd:

 Sūkt 1| Mantr 2

DSM Satyarthi

—————————————————————————————————————

1By Som  Ādityās strong2 by Som Earth great3

No doubt4, in the genital organ of these constellations5, Som is established optimum6.

————————————————————————————————–

1.R’shikā: Sūryā Sāvitrī

Dévtā/ Divine Subject: Som

Chhand/Meter: Anushŧup

2. Ved is revealed in a telegraphic language, not in any ordinary language.

This basic fact, about Ved, always must be remembered while studying Ved gravely.

I’m sorry to say that the Westerners never studied Ved gravely.

I’m sorrier to say that the Westerners were never serious not only about Ved.

They were never equally serious about Bible and Qur’an too, as well.

These scriptures were never seriously studied by the Westerners.

If they were ever studied seriously, by the Westerners; the Western Culture, now on the path of its certain suicide, would never were on its suicidal path.

It was an unfortunate tragedy that when Ved, Bible and Qur’an were being studied by the Westerners, the Communism was fighting its own war of survival with religion.

It made the Communist thinkers more biased those days than they are not biased even today.

No biased studies should be taken seriously ever.

Yet, isn’t it a tragedy that, the entirely biased studies of those days, by the Communist thinkers are still being taken seriously?

Isn’t it a time to re-study Ved, Bible, Qur’an and the related literature more seriously, scientifically and absolutely unbiased, for a change?

We have one more benefit the Communist thinkers of those days didn’t have.

The Communism in those days was utopian somewhat, even after the great scientific studies Karl Marx and Frederick Engels did then.

It was not a scientific fact, known those days that, the Multiverse is made of vibrations of energy basically.

This fact, revealed and accepted scientifically afterwards, has changed the entire scenario of scientific studies about the matters the Communist thinkers had done their studies.

Marriage institution is also one of them.

The persons who have studied Western Culture seriously know very well that the Western Culture does not stand on scientific grounds only.

In fact, no culture can ever stand on scientific grounds only howsoever it insists to stand.

Any theory, any fact, when it is brought into practice always succumbs to human emotions prevailing those days.

It has to.

It hasn’t another option if it has to come into practice.

Humans never react scientifically only.

Neither can they ever do it.

Scientific facts are never emotional until they are facts only.

As soon as they are brought into practice they have to deal with the humans.

Humans include both males and females.

Not only females are emotional ones, the males are also not very different in the matter.

No doubt, the females are more emotionals than the males.

Nevertheless, even the males are not devoid of emotions absolutely.

Hence, any scientific fact, however factually it is known to us, when brought into practice, is bound to succumb to the emotional needs of the humans those are bringing it into practice.

That’s why the theory and practice always differ howsoever honest its implementers are.

That’s why even Eīshān Param Brahm Paramātmā has instructed us not to confine ourselves to the principles only i.e. Ved, but  to the very Mission of Life/ExistenceKr’ñvanto VishvamāryamDharm Santānam, Dharm Sansthāpan, as well; to bring the principles into practice and study Divý Itihās, the Divine History for it:

  1. Dhiyo yo nah prachodayāt
  2. Yāthātathyatah

This fact, once realized in its full form, can immensely help us to re-study about marriage institution once opposed by the Communist thinkers so insistently, so persistently.

The Communist thinkers of those days found marriage institution an immensely avoidable obstacle in their pathway to Communism.

They thought marriage institutions give birth to Private Property.

The Communist thinkers were right.

But they were not right in thinking that the family was the only institution that caused the accumulation of Private Property.

Moreover, owing to immense drastic failure of communist economic, social and political system around the entire globe, we have to think more gravely now do we really need to oppose private property anymore.

Aren’t the financial scams, not done by the advocates of Private Property, more serious, more dangerous and more destructive to the humanity and Democracy than the Private Property itself is?

We should never forget that the destruction of Private Property absolutely, leads to destroy the family itself.

Frederick Engels has already written in the subject as much as we don’t need any analysis more to understand the subject comprehensively.

We need Private Property to protect and safeguard a family.

We have no other option to it.

Consequently, why not support Welfare Capitalism and State Capitalism instead of opposing Private Property?

We have experienced bitterly that our industries can’t survive in so-called Communism.

Moreover, we have experienced bitterly too that Communism has led to a totalitarianism called Stalinism now.

We need industries to go ahead.

In fact, we need industries to march ahead.

The Welfare Capitalism and State Capitalism are more suitable for it then the so-called Communism or the ‘Socialism’ prone to nonstop Scams.

Shouldn’t we think over it more gravely now?

Today, we can easily observe around us that even the singles have Private Property.

Moreover, to be more exactly honest and sincere, the entire history of humankind has proven now that the singles crave for Private Property even more than the married persons do.

Why is it so?

Because the married persons have their family to take care of them in their old age, while the singles don’t.

They have only their money to take care of them in their old age.

It is the reason why the singles are found more corrupt than the married persons in accumulating Private Property and wealth.

That’s why Hinduism does not support single life, except only when a single can’t afford even a single wife.

It specifically orders:

S’ nah pitév sūnavé’gné sūpāyano bhav,

Sachasvā nah svastayé.’

‘He, be unto us, as a father to son, Agni, easy to access.

Be together optimum, properly, for our welfare.’

—      Ved: R’gved: 1| 1| 9

Ihaiv stam mā vi yaushŧam vishvamāyurvyashnutam,

Krīdantau putrairnaptr’bhirmodmānau své gr’hé.’

‘Abide ye both only here. Don’t be separated. Enjoy whole life sporting with sons grandsons, rejoicing in own home.’

—      Ved: R’gved: 10| 85| 42

Ihaiv stam mā vi yaushŧam vishvamāyurvyashnutam,

Krīdantau putrairnaptr’bhirmodmānau svastakau.’

‘Abide ye both only here. Don’t be separated. Enjoy whole life sporting with sons grandsons4, rejoicing in the lovely home.’

—      Ved: Atharv Ved: 14|1|22

The Communist thinkers never thought, neither they could, in those days of too limited resources to research anything that, marriage institution was not the only vice in their pathway to Communism.

In fact, the singles are more severe problems in their way.

The Communist thinkers wildly opposed marriage institution and family.

In fact they are still opposing it blindly, not even realizing the fact that the entire history of humankind has already proven them wrong now.

The Communism as a movement has lost its original momentum now.

It is not because it’s nonsense, as it’s claimed by its blind communal opponents.

The Communism as a movement is not nonsense.

It is necessary for the uplifting of the downtroddens.

Even Hinduism has the same goal as The Communism as a movement has.

The point where Hinduism differs with the Communism as a movement is not its goal, its means of implementation instead.

So, the Communism as a movement doesn’t need to oppose either marriage institution or family ever to achieve its mission.

Hinduism, Islam, Judaism, Christianity, in fact no religion, basically, is in opposition to the Communism as a movement, at all.

The Communism as a movement believed that the mission could be achieved through the dictatorship of the laborers.

The subsequent history of humankind has now expressly proven that such a belief of the then Communists was wrong.

Why?

Because, as already said, the Communism was then only a theory.

It was never practiced by its propellers.

Every theory when it is brought into practice, always refines itself.

No theorist can ever anticipate, absolutely and flawlessly, what lies in its pathway in future.

After all, every theorist, whatsoever theory he/she propels, is a human being, and bound to remain a human being.

A human being is not an omniscient, neither he/she ever can be.

So, howsoever the theory he/she proposes is flawless when propelled, it’s bound to prove in future that it wasn’t so.

The laborers never knew how the enterprises are built up and run.

If they had known how to build up enterprises and how to run them, they would have already done it without any help of the Communist thinkers.

Why have they waited for the moment the Communist thinkers declare them the dictators of a country?

To build up any enterprise first of all an enterpriser has to dream of it to the extent that it becomes an obsession to him/her.

Until and unless it isn’t an obsession to him even an enterpriser can’t build up any enterprise let alone any laborer or a group of laborers.

An enterpriser builds up his/her enterprise first in his/her own mind with its each and every minutest details.

He is so obsessed with these minutest details that, he sees it in his mind.

This imaginary vision in his/her mind always exists in his/her mind while he/she attempts to bring it into fact.

Until and unless this obsession does not become his/her madness, he/she can’t bring into existence.

It’s also a labor, the original Communist thinkers never realized.

That’s why when they took hold of the excellently running enterprises and put them under the dictatorship of the laborers, even the excellently running enterprises failed to continue.

The dictators lacked this vision, this obsession, and this madness.

It was the oxygen an enterpriser supplies to the enterprises.

Unfortunately only he/she can do it, none else.

The Communist thinkers never realized it.

The Communist thinkers made the laborers dictators on the shrewd persons who knew very well how to win the obstacles in their pathways.

They bribed the laborers in administration heavily.

The laborers in administration had never seen money.

They surrendered to the bribery of shrewdest businesspersons.

The movement started suffering heavily.

And ultimately it flopped.

It had to.

The laborers in administration were most of the persons who were everlosers.*

Watch your present day politicians.

Who are they?

Isn’t it a fact that most of them are the persons who are highly Uneducated/Under educated?

Isn’t it a fact that so many of them are criminal/criminal minded?

Why is it so?

Because most of the laborers in administration were dictators, but the persons they dictated were shrewder and more efficient.

The businesspersons became kingmakers instead of kings.

Apparently the businesspersons were not administrators, the chosen representatives of the people were.

But the businesspersons were kingmakers and shrewder.

The dictatorship of the Uneducated/Under educated ones, on shrewder persons, made itself ineffective.

Administration requires prudence.

The laborers in administration hadn’t developed it.

The system, consequently, failed.

It had to.*

Ved: 4 Atharv Ved: Kānd 14| Vivāh Kānd: Sookt 1| Mantr 3

——————————————————————————

More Commentary on Ved from DSM Satyarthi:

1. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

2. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 1| Mantr 2

3. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 1| Mantr 3

4. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 5| Mantr 3

5. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 7| Mantr 5

6. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 7| Mantr 8

4. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 1

5. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 2

6. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 3

7. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 4

8. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 5

9. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 6

10. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 7

11. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 8

12.R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 9

13. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 33| Mantr 1

14. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 33| Mantr 2

14. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 58| Mantr 6

15. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 164| Mantr 20

16. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 164| Mantr 46

17. R’gved: Mandal 2| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

18 R’gved: Mandal 3| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

19. R’gved: Mandal 3| Sookt 6| Mantr 2

20. R’gved: Mandal 4| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

21. R’gved: Mandal 4| Sookt 26| Mantr 2

22. R’gved: Mandal 5| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

23. R’gved: Mandal 6| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

24. R’gved: Mandal 7| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

25. R’gved: Mandal 8| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

26. R’gved: Mandal 9| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

27. R’gved: Mandal 9| Sookt 63| Mantr 4-5

28. R’gved: Mandal 10| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

29. R’gved: Mandal 10| Sookt 85| Mantr 42

30. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 1| Mantr 1

31. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 1| Mantr 2

32. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 1| Mantr 3

33. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 1| Mantr 4

34. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 11| Mantr 1

35. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 13| Mantr 4

36. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 23| Mantr 3

37. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 31| Mantr 18

38. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 40| Mantr2

39. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 40| Mantr8

40. Saamved: Mantr 1

41. Sāmved: Mantr 115

42. Sāmved: Mantr 641: Mahānāmnyārchik| 1

43. Sāmved: Mantr 650: Mahānāmnyārchik| 10

44. Sāmved: Mantr 651: Uttarārchik

45. Atharv Ved: Kaand 1| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

46.  Atharv Ved: Kānd 3| Sookt 30| Mantr 3

47. Atharv Ved: Kānd 3| Sookt 30| Mantr 4

48. Atharv Ved: Kānd 3| Sookt 30| Mantr 6

49. Atharv Ved: Kānd 4| Sookt 4| Mantr 6

50. Atharv Ved: Kānd 4| Sookt 4| Mantr 7

51. Atharv Ved: Kānd 4| Sookt 4| Mantr 8

52. Atharv Ved: Kaand 4| Sookt 13| Mantr 1

53. Atharv Ved: Kaand 8| Sookt 1| Mantr 6

54. Atharv Ved: Kaand 8| Sookt 4| Mantr 22

55. Atharv Ved: Kaand 14| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

56. Atharv Ved: Kaand 14| Sookt 1| Mantr 2

57. Atharv Ved: Kaand 14| Sookt 1| Mantr 3

58. Atharv Ved: Kaand 14| Sookt 1| Mantr 4

59.  Atharv Ved: Kaand 14| Sookt 1| Mantr 22

60.Atharv Ved: Kaand 14| Sookt 2| Mantr 25

Ved Bhāshý: Atharv Ved: Kānd: 14: Sookt: 1: Mantr:59

Ved Bhāshý:

4 Atharv Ved:

Kānd: 14: Sookt: 1: Mantr:59

DSM Satyarthi

——————————————————————————————-

Udyachchhadhvamap raxo hanāthémām nārīm sukr’té dadhāt.

Dhātā vipashchit patimasyai vivéd bhago rājā pur étu prajānan.

——————————————————————————————–

1Stand up2/Raise ye3. Smite away the demons4. Set this woman for well doer5. Inspired holder/guardian6 must know especially7 the husband for her8. The well knowing politician9 come first/ahead10 for her genital organ11.

—————————————————————————————–

1.R’shikā: Sūryā Sāvitrī

Dévtā/ Divine Subject: Ātmā, Soul

Chhand/Meter: Trishŧup

7. that her husband must be a Sukr’t, a well doer, and well doer only.

He must ensure absolutely, beyond doubt, that he is not a wicked.

It should never be taken lightly.

He must know and guarantee it especially, ‘Vivéd’.

After all he is a dhātā and he must be Vipashchit.

If he is a dhātā and he is not a Vipashchit, he must take the help of other Vipashchits.

———————————————————————————————–

More Commentary on Ved from DSM Satyarthi:

1. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

2. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 1| Mantr 2

3. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 1| Mantr 3

4. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 5| Mantr 3

5. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 7| Mantr 5

6. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 7| Mantr 8

4. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 1

5. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 2

6. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 3

7. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 4

8. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 5

9. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 6

10. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 7

11. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 8

12.R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 9

13. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 33| Mantr 1

14. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 33| Mantr 2

14. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 58| Mantr 6

15. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 164| Mantr 20

16. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 164| Mantr 46

17. R’gved: Mandal 2| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

18 R’gved: Mandal 3| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

19. R’gved: Mandal 3| Sookt 6| Mantr 2

20. R’gved: Mandal 4| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

21. R’gved: Mandal 4| Sookt 26| Mantr 2

22. R’gved: Mandal 5| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

23. R’gved: Mandal 6| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

24. R’gved: Mandal 7| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

25. R’gved: Mandal 8| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

26. R’gved: Mandal 9| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

27. R’gved: Mandal 9| Sookt 63| Mantr 4-5

28. R’gved: Mandal 10| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

29. R’gved: Mandal 10| Sookt 85| Mantr 42

30. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 1| Mantr 1

31. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 1| Mantr 2

32. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 1| Mantr 3

33. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 1| Mantr 4

34. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 11| Mantr 1

35. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 13| Mantr 4

36. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 23| Mantr 3

37. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 31| Mantr 18

38. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 40| Mantr2

39. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 40| Mantr8

40. Saamved: Mantr 1

41. Sāmved: Mantr 115

42. Sāmved: Mantr 641: Mahānāmnyārchik| 1

43. Sāmved: Mantr 650: Mahānāmnyārchik| 10

44. Sāmved: Mantr 651: Uttarārchik

45. Atharv Ved: Kaand 1| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

46.  Atharv Ved: Kānd 3| Sookt 30| Mantr 3

47. Atharv Ved: Kānd 3| Sookt 30| Mantr 4

48. Atharv Ved: Kānd 3| Sookt 30| Mantr 6

49. Atharv Ved: Kānd 4| Sookt 4| Mantr 6

50. Atharv Ved: Kānd 4| Sookt 4| Mantr 7

51. Atharv Ved: Kānd 4| Sookt 4| Mantr 8

52. Atharv Ved: Kaand 4| Sookt 13| Mantr 1

53. Atharv Ved: Kaand 8| Sookt 1| Mantr 6

54. Atharv Ved: Kaand 8| Sookt 4| Mantr 22

55. Atharv Ved: Kaand 14| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

56. Atharv Ved: Kaand 14| Sookt 1| Mantr 2

57. Atharv Ved: Kaand 14| Sookt 1| Mantr 3

58. Atharv Ved: Kaand 14| Sookt 1| Mantr 4

59.  Atharv Ved: Kaand 14| Sookt 1| Mantr 22

60.Atharv Ved: Kaand 14| Sookt 2| Mantr 25

Ved: 4 Atharv Ved: Kānd 14| Vivāh Kānd: Sookt 1| Mantr 1

Ved: Ved Bhāshý

4 Atharv Ved

 Kānd 14 Vivāh Kānd:

 Sūkt 1| Mantr 1

DSM Satyarthi

———————————————————————————

Satyénottabhitā bhūmih sūryéñottabhitā dyauh,

R’ténādityāstishŧhanti divi somo adhi shritah.

—————————————————————————-

 1By truth, the Earth is balanced2. By Sun, the celestial system is balanced optimum3. By Eternal Truth Ādityās stand4. In the celestial system, Som is set rightfully5.

————————————————————————

 1.R’shikā: Sūryā Sāvitrī

Dévtā/ Divine Subject: Ātmā, Soul

Chhand/Meter: Trishŧup

2. ‘Satyénottabhitā bhūmih’.

Uttabhitā’ is feminine gender of ‘Ut-stabh’.

According to Āchārý Sāyañ, as every Western scholar of Ved claims to follow Āchārý Sāyañ, whether he really does follow Āchārý Sāyañ or not, W. D. Whitney has also suggested the same, in his famous translation of Atharv Ved.

It does not mean, however, that this Commentary of Ved accepts the authority of W. D. Whitney, Ralph Thomas Hotchkin Griffith or Āchārý Sāyañ.

Never.

This Commentary of Ved accepts the authority of Ved, Shākhā Granths, Brāhmañ Granths, Ārañyaks, Upanishads, Nighanŧu, Nirukt and Vedic Sanskr’t Grammar only.

It can always be proved profoundly that the translations of W. D. Whitney, Āchārý Sāyañ, and other Western scholars, of Ved, do materially differ from Ved, Shākhā Granths, Brāhmañ Granths, Ārañyaks, Upanishads, Nighanŧu, Nirukt and Vedic Sanskr’t Grammar.

The translations of W. D. Whitney, Āchārý Sāyañ, and other Western scholars, of Ved, are either contradictory to Ved, Shākhā Granths, Brāhmañ Granths, Ārañyaks, Upanishads, Nighanŧu, Nirukt and Vedic Sanskr’t Grammar, or immensely poor translations of Ved, even if they follow Ved, Shākhā Granths, Brāhmañ Granths, Ārañyaks, Upanishads, Nighanŧu, Nirukt and Vedic Sanskr’t Grammar, anywhere.

The Western scholars of Ved and their so-called Indian advocates claim the Western translations of Ved depict the true form of Ved as it was being practiced by Hindus initially.

Of course, their such claims are profoundly wrong and self contradictory.

The Commentary of Ved by Āchārý Sāyañ cannot be written before Āchārý Sāyañ, himself.

It is obvious from the request of King of Vijay Nagar Empire, to Āchārý Mādhav, that no Commentary of Ved was found those days, that explained the logic of Ved as it was used in Yāgnik rituals.

Āchārý Mādhav, the elder brother of Āchārý Sāyañ, refused immediately to grant the request of King of Vijay Nagar Empire, declaring it an unnecessary effort and not beneficial to Hindus too.

The King of Vijay Nagar Empire could not understand it.

He was only a king, not a scholar of Ved or Vedic Sanskr’t.

He requested to Āchārý Sāyañ, the younger brother of Āchārý Mādhav, to do the task seeking the guidance of his elder brother, Āchārý Mādhav, whenever, whatsoever and wherever it was available to him, as he was his real younger brother.

Satyénottabhitā bhūmih’ ‘By truth, the Earth is balanced’ means that even in marriage, never deviate from truth as it is told in Ved.

There are so many persons, especially in these days of rotten Western Culture, who ridicule the persons following truth in marriage activities.

They imply that it isn’t necessary anywhere to practice truth if it is not beneficial to the practitioners.

Even if it is beneficial to them in the long run, the Westerners and their Eastern followers profoundly and shamelessly disapprove of following it.

They treat such persons backward and either ridicule them or at least treat them sympathetically, as if they are doing any sin following the truth.

Ved rejects this dangerous policy ab initio.

It starts its Vivāh Kānd, its Book of Marriage, by reminding its followers the importance of truth in the System it proposes.

We know very well that it’s always immensely troublesome to the non followers of Ved to follow the truth in any matter.

If they could do it, why they would have not followed Ved itself?

Does Ved propose anything untrue anywhere in any Mantr of it?

Never.

Yet, either they openly refuse to follow Ved or tactfully at least.

They refuse to follow Ved, not because Ved is untrue.

They refuse to follow Ved, because Ved follows nothing but truth and truth only.

They can’t afford truth.

Their system of life is profoundly full of untruths.

Every system of life wherever it differs/deviates from Ved, is untrue there, either knowingly or unknowingly.

Whatever maybe the case, ultimately in both the cases, it’s always dangerous to follow it.

Sooner or later, the truth is always disclosed.

It can’t be hidden forever.

It is one of the fundamentals of Our System, running through infinite creations, that anything true, cannot be hidden forever.

It is bound to be exposed sooner or later.

Marriage is a serious affair.

It should never be based on anything untrue whatsoever.

There are so many persons, who don’t follow Ved, that suggest either this way or that way, not to be true in marriage activities, if something is harmful.

They suggest to hide that thing.

Ved does never approve of such suicidal action.

After marriage when it would be disclosed it may break the marriage even causing your daughter immensely troublesome circumstances.

The circumstances maybe suicidal even.

Consequently, never listen to the persons who suggest such impractical policies.

It’s not the matter of life and death for their own daughter.

But it is the matter of life and death for your own daughter

Can you ever even think of  risking your daughter’s life/happiness?

If yes, why are you marrying your daughter/sister at all?

Only to get rid of her?

Never act on the suggestion(s) of your wife/wives in this matter.

If she is the mother of your daughter/sister, that’s what she does want in her blind love for her daughter.

A mother is always blind in her love for her children.

That’s how a mother is made by Us.

The children need it very much for their own very existence.

But it does not mean you must also be as blind in love as the mother is.

It does not make any difference whatsoever whether you are the father or brother of the potential bride.

Nevertheless, you have altogether different responsibilities from that of a mother.

You can’t afford to be as blind in love, as the mother is, and if not, she can be.

She is made for the purpose.

Are you also made for the same purpose?

The persons, who answer this question in the affirmative, are excused to do whatever they want to do.

Ved does not perceive them as men.

Even if they want to be perceived as men, Ved refuses bluntly to oblige them.

Vedic System of life expressly differentiates between a man and a woman.

It is never afraid of any nescience, any Avidyā, whatsoever it maybe.

It maybe Western Culture, it maybe the so called Islam that is Pseudo Islam actually, invented by Yazīd malåūn, Årab Burdāfaroshs and the then Mullahs and Maulavīs who served  Yazīd malåūn, and Årab Burdāfaroshs in developing Pseudo Islam.

It maybe atheism even.

Whatsoever the nescience maybe, Hinduism/Ved is never afraid of it.

It has already announced valiantly:

Vidyām chāvidyām ch’ yastdvédobhayagvong sah, avidyayā mr’tyum tīrtvā vidyayāmr’tamashnuté.’

Science and nescience who knows both simultaneously, by nescience crossing death, by science attains Eternity.’

Ved: 2 Yajurvéd: 40| 14

Ved differentiates between man and woman.

Of course, it does not differentiate in their fundamental human rights.

It differentiates in their physical differences, none can deny ever.

Owing to their physical differences therefore, Hinduism/Ved proposes them two different fields of actions.

Never imitate irrationally the non Hindus foolishly.

They are a dying culture now, dying fastest.

Hinduism/Ved is the culture now replacing their dying culture fastest whether they like it or not.

In not very far future, you have to lead the entire humankind once more forever, if you follow Us unconditional.

It is not the everfirst you have to do it.

Our followers have always done it physically, even if they widely differed in their names.

‘By truth, the Earth is balanced’ ‘Satyénottabhitā bhūmih’ does also mean that if you scrutinize earth/land and women, you find they have so many things common in them.

The Earth does not exist itself.

Its existence depends on the sun.

The entire solar system depends on sun for its existence including the Earth itself.

No doubt, the Earth/land gives life to agriculture, plants and trees on it, and it bears the same too.

But if the Sun explodes and/or dies, the entire solar system including the Earth dies too with the entire life on it whether planetary, animal or human.

The Earth alone, without Sun, cannot give and/or support any life at all.

On the contrary, even the existence of entire solar system, including Earth, depends on the existence of the Sun itself.

The importance of a man and a woman in a family is also somewhat similar to the existence of a Sun and an Earth in a solar system.

A woman is necessary to give and support life in a family, but she can’t do it alone.

She needs a man too for it.

Doubtlessly, the females are made in abundance by Us in Our entire infinite creations, but they are Brahmā only, not Vishñu, all pervading.

Every Param Purush Ummil Åālmīn kañ, molecule, has a different Ummil Åālmīn, but similar Param Purush.

Similarly, every planet has a different land in a solar system, yet the similar Sun.

If the Sun is different, the entire solar system is bound to be a different solar system from the first.

A solar system is recognized not by an Earth there, not by a planet there, however important the Earth or the planets may be.

There are solar systems in the galaxies that make creations as a whole, not terrestrial systems, nor planetary systems.

No terrestrial system or no planetary system can exist without a Sun.

Consequently, it’s more than evident that all the glamorization of Earth that it gives and bears life is of course a truth, but a local truth, a conditional truth only, ‘Satý’, not an universal, unconditional, eternal truth, ‘R’t’.

In a family of a Sukr’t, in the system of life advised and proposed by Us in Ved/Hinduism, similarly, a woman usually comes into contact with the local, conditional, truth, ‘Satý’, only.

It is not necessary for her to run a family to be aware of eternal truth, R’t’ too, if there is a Sukr’t to watch this field of family operations.

3. ‘Sūryéñottabhitā dyauh.’

After reminding the importance of truth, now Ved is reminding the specific nature of the movement of Hinduism/Ved.

It is not like other remaining movements.

It is based on Sukr’ts.

Its Mission of life/existence is to establish a society of Sukr’ts, noble doers.

Even for marriage, it can never compromise with its Mission of life/existence Kr’ñvanto Vishvamāryam/ Dharmsantānam/Dharmsansthāpan.

Consequently, it immediately advances to tell that, basically, it’s a polygamist movement.

Of course, polygamy is not an indispensable necessity here, but it cannot be ruled out entirely too.

As far as the law of the land is concerned, polygamy is legally prohibited in most of the modern countries today.

In these modern countries, of course, every member of this movement, even, has to follow the law of the land.

Even if he is a sun in vigor, and the celestial system is balanced by the sun, optimum, he would never break the law of the land.

Till it is the law, he would, of course, respect and follow it.

But it does never mean that he would not put his utmost legal prudence and efforts to change the law of the land to suit the nature of his Mission of life/existence Kr’ñvanto Vishvamāryam/ Dharmsantānam/Dharmsansthāpan, using every legal step and means.

He is of course a citizen of the country and as such, he has, both, to respect and follow the law of the land, till it is the law of the land.

His duties towards his country do not necessitate him to forget his greater duties towards entire humanity.

His potential bride and her relatives must understand this fact expressly, entirely and specifically.

If he is not capable to practice polygamy physically, legally or financially, it does not mean that he would not put his extreme efforts even to be capable for it physically, legally or financially, whatsoever the case maybe.

‘By Sun, the celestial system is balanced optimum’ ‘Sūryéñottabhitā dyauh’ means a man, in his family, must never forget this eternal truth in the system of life proposed, advised, by Us.

He cannot limit himself to the local, conditional, truths only.

He is not an Earth or a planet in the family.

He is the Sun.

The entire solar system depends on him for its very life and existence.

He has to take care of himself more than the rest of the family because he has to take care of the entire family.

If he exists, his entire family is safeguarded.

His wife/wives are Earth.

His children are planets.

All of them are revolving around him.

He can’t afford to indulge in the luxuries of experimenting every this or that sentimental or emotional wave coming to him from anywhere.

His unawareness, his inattentiveness, to it would be more severe to himself and to his family members too.

He can’t afford to be as indifferent to the eternal truths as his family members can.

Doubtlessly, they also have to pay its cost, but not to the extent, the man of the family would have to.

He can’t afford to the luxuries of his sentimental or emotional outbursts as his family members can afford to indulge in from time to time.

He is the Sun of the family.

The family is his solar system, ‘dyauh’.

He has to burn himself for the existence and the welfare of the family.

His family exists only until he burns himself.

No sooner he stops burning himself, his family would have to go astray, and die ultimately.

The feminists and the immature thinkers have glamorized the role of a mother in a family too much out of proportion.

They have written poems about it.

Even their prose about it is heavily poetic.

But the life isn’t a poem only.

It’s a scientific fact you all have to face.

Consequently, never indulge in poetry of the damn fools and keep yourself alert, attentive, watchful, prepared, aware, vigilant, observant, and ready to understand and face the eternal facts of life.

Let the damn fools indulge in the luxuries of the poetry and pay its cost.

You can’t afford it.

You are the sun.

You have to support your family, your solar system.

So, burn yourself.

There isn’t another alternative if you really want to safeguard your family.

‘By Sun, the celestial system is balanced optimum’ ‘Sūryéñottabhitā dyauh’ does, moreover, mean that it’s your duty to balance your solar system, your family.

The freedom of family members in your family doesn’t mean they have a right to unbalance the family even.

Sūryéñ uttabhitā dyauh‘By Sun, the celestial system is balanced optimum’.

Never allow your family members to break the discipline of the family.

It’s more dangerous to them than even compromising with their freedom.

Freedom doesn’t mean lack of discipline.

It means responsibility and self-discipline instead.

Even no Democratic country can afford to allow its citizens to break its constitution, law and order.

How can you?

A family is a smallest political unit you have to run.

You are a Democratic political leader of the family.

You have certainly to respect the personal freedom of your family members but never forget, at the same time, by hook or crook, by creative Diplomacy, you have to safeguard the discipline of the family as well.

Your family members don’t have their personal freedom and their personal family rights only.

They have their collective responsibilities and duties to their family as well.

Never forget they can’t be allowed to ignore their collective responsibilities and duties to their family.

Being the Sun of the family, you have to balance, ‘uttabhitā,it.

Sūryéñ uttabhitā dyauh‘By Sun, the celestial system is balanced optimum’.

You can’t rule out a possibility, however, that your family members maybe irrational enough not to surrender to the discipline you impose on your family and may still fight with you for their family rights.

In their over enthusiasm of destroying the family to get rid of the Private Property the foolish communist thinkers and the cunning utmost ever selfish businesspersons have philosophized abundantly to achieve this ever imprudent ever impious goal.

Even after the drastic failure of communist political and social system everywhere, no movement has tried seriously to amend it properly, though its necessity cannot be denied if you really are grave to balance and/or establish your family optimum.

Don’t wait for the others to do it for you and/or your family.

You can’t afford it.

You are the Sun of your family.

You have to do it yourself if nobody is doing it for you.

The feminists say, ‘Women and Earth have to bear many things’.

Tell them, ‘Men and Sun have to burn themselves for their family indefinitely.’

Now, be impartial and decide yourself truthfully who is doing more and who is more essential for the family actually.

Sometimes the lady/ladies of the house don’t understand this cold and hard truth because they are cows of the darkness, ‘Tamso gāh’.

You have to marry them, because the system requires you to do so:

Imām nārīm sukr’té dadhāt

Bear this woman to the noble doer’.

Indro nirjyotishā tamso gā aduxat

The controller of organs milked the cows of darkness.’

Since the lady/ladies of the house has/have come, in this way, from darkness, they don’t understand the gravity of the fact that ‘Sūryéñ uttabhitā dyauh‘By Sun, the celestial system is balanced optimum’ perfectly optimum.

Therefore, they are naturally unable to convey the fact they themselves don’t know/don’t understand, to their children perfectly optimum.

It makes the married life/Gr’hasth Āshram more problematic than it is for the Vr’trs even.

That’s why every coward, foolish and inertia-obsessed man, this way or that way, tries to run away from the responsibilities of the system proposed by Us.

Only a ‘Sūrý’, a sun, a Dharmyoddhā, a brave man, do it with his continuous nonstop bravery, not a coward, a foolish man.

The system proposed by Us, is thoroughly scientific and mathematical.

It requires ‘dhiyah’, ‘wisdoms’ even to understand it optimum and a nonstop constant continuous research of facts: ‘Yāthātathyatah’.

You can’t even survive in this system too if you don’t attempt to complete your Mission of life/existence Kr’ñvanto Vishvamāryam/ Dharmsantānam/Dharmsansthāpan, sincerely and establish an organization dedicated to it:

Samāno mantrah samitih samānī’.

It’s the initial requirement of the system itself, proposed by us.

Never complain that your wife/wives and/or children don’t understand it and don’t help/cooperate with you.

It’s natural if you follow the system:

Imām nārīm sukr’té dadhāt

Bear this woman to the noble doer’.

Indro nirjyotishā tamso gā aduxat

The controller of organs milked the cows of darkness.’

You have to face the problem diplomatically and solve it continuously nonstop.

That’s what the Gr’hasth Āshram/the married life is.

You can’t surrender to your wife/wives and/or children ever.

You have to control them and make them to follow you:

Anuvratah pituh putro mātrā bhavatu sammanāh

jāyā patyé madhumatīm vācham vadatu shantivām.’

The son must follow the sacred mission of the father and keep the mind/heart of the mother.

The wife should speak to the husband sweetly,  in concord.’

Ved: 4 Atharvved: 3|30|2

Never forget you are the Sun in your own solar system, no one else.

Consequently, you have to control it, no one else, naturally.

The others can only help and/or cooperate with you in controlling your family.

They can’t themselves control it as successfully and as beneficially as you can do it yourself.

4. ‘R’ténādityāstishŧhanti.’

You can run away neither from the Eternal Facts, described in Ved extensively, nor from the local truth and the truths as they are found and believed in your own time.

Practically, that’s the maximum, you can do.

Of course, so many persons among you still ridicule any grave interpretations of Ved.

But they ridicule actually whatsoever religious guidance you follow.

They are not against Ved, actually.

Actually, they are against everything religious.

They are actually confused persons.

They ridicule the persons following Ved, as if they know very well it’s profound foolishness.

But if you try to discuss with them what they themselves have to offer to replace Ved, if they really find to follow Ved is, Shanno Mitrah sham varuñah shanno bhavatvaryamā, ridiculous.

They have nothing to offer to replace Ved, yet they still ridicule to follow Ved.

Why?

They themselves don’t know.

They, Shanno Mitrah sham varuñah shanno bhavatvaryamā, ridicule Ved and its followers, but they don’t know its alternative.

Yet, they think they are more prudent than the persons following Ved.

They most certainly are not.

They think they are more prudent but if you really invite them to discuss their own ideology, you may be surprised to find that they don’t have any ideology at all.

It is the real fact.

The persons who don’t have any ideology at all, ridicule the persons who have a perfectly rational and scientific ideology they can discuss thoroughly, extensively and without any hesitation and irritation at all.

So many Hindus think it’s communal to think of oneself as a Hindu.

But they don’t think it’s communal if a Musalmān thinks himself as a Musalmān, a Christian thinks himself as a Christian, a Jew thinks himself as a Jew, a Persian thinks himself as a Persian and an atheist thinks himself as an atheist.

He does not realize it’s double standard, actually, he/she is practicing about Hindus.

He/she goes on to practice it without never realizing even what he/she is practicing is entirely unjust, irrational and inhumane even.

It was started by anti Hindus, and even the so called Hindus are practicing it now, without any realization whatsoever what they are doing.

They ridicule Hindus while actually they are themselves the persons who should be ridiculed for their profound stupidity.

If you don’t want to be recognized as a Hindu, no one is compelling you to do so.

You just go ahead and declare so.

But you can’t do even that.

Because you are actually a timid and a coward person.

You are afraid of knowing what you are actually.

You don’t want to acknowledge the fact that you are actually yourself ridiculous, timid and coward.

Hindus are most certainly Not.

How is a person ridiculous if he/she has and practices a rational, scientific and mathematical ideology?

And how are you even to be respected if you neither have nor practice any such thing?

Aren’t you yourself a person who deserves to be ridiculed, instead of ridiculing Hindus?

If you don’t want to be addressed as a Hindu, be brave and declare so.

If you want to remain only an Indian, an atheist or whatsoever you think yourself, it is not a problem for the Hindus.

You can do whatsoever you damn please.

But you can’t be allowed to deceive and to cheat the others.

It’s not only an immoral act; it’s a crime as well.

If you are not even aware of it, think how prudent you are yourself, ridiculing Hindus.

Do you really want to continue it?

You like it or not, until and unless you don’t declare you are not a Hindu, you are legally a Hindu, and you’d be recognized as a Hindu for all practical and legal purposes.

As far as the social, legal and practical purposes are, the Hindus are concerned with you if you don’t declare that you are not a Hindu.

The question is why should the Hindus allow you to deceive, to cheat them, that you are a Hindu, if you are actually not a Hindu?

It is dangerous to them.

If there be a communal riot, and you can’t guarantee that there would never be one, the Hindus would believe that you are one of them while you are certainly not.

As such, you are not bound to defend Hindus against their communal enemies whosoever they may be.

While the Hindus would defend you and your interests.

Why should you be allowed this privilege by the persons you ridicule so shamelessly?

Why shouldn’t you be thrown to the wolves in the same way you throw the Hindus whenever you ridicule them?

Why should the Hindus allow you to have the benefits of being a Hindu when it’s beneficial to you, and the benefits of being an anti Hindu whenever it is beneficial to you?

Why Hindus should suffer in both the cases?

Why should you be allowed to get benefits in both the cases?

If you are not a Hindu, you would never be allowed to get its benefits.

And if you are a Hindu, you can’t be allowed to ridicule the other Hindus in your profound stupidity.

If you are a secular Hindu and hate the other Hindus because they are not secular in your profound stupid eyes, you are invited respectfully to discuss your points and to prove you are right.

You can do it.

But if instead of discussing your points if you stupidly ridicule the actually secular, rational, scientific and mathematical Hindus you’d be ridiculed too.

If instead of behaving as a prudent person, you choose to behave irresponsibly, why should a responsible person follow you?

Why shouldn’t he/she ridicule you in the same way and bring your profound stupidity in front of the other reasonable responsible persons?

‘By Eternal Truth Ādityās stand’ ‘R’ténādityāstishŧhanti’ means never act as if you are a planet or Earth.

You are certainly NOT.

You are an Āditý, a Sun.

A sun has to take care of the entire planets including the Earth too.

You can’t afford to be as negligent to the eternal truth, ‘R’t’ as your other family members can.

To the most, they would harm only themselves thus.

But if you do the same mistake you would harm the entire family.

Your position is more important than your rest of the family members.

You are bound to follow eternal truth.

You are bound to be brave and vigorous so that you can safeguard and protect your family members.

You are bound to burn yourself as the suns do for the life and existence of their solar system.

‘By Eternal Truth Ādityās stand’ ‘R’ténādityāstishŧhanti’.

5. ‘Divi somo adhi shritah’.

You have to allow polygamy as a potential possibility at least if you really follow the system We propose.

Again, you can’t be allowed to have and eat your cake simultaneously.

If you live in a country that does not allow polygamy legally for your religious group, while it does allow the same for another religious group living in the same country, you must fight against such a shameless double standard in legal practice even.

If you think, polygamy is itself not correct you must revolt against the society that is allowed legally to practice it too.

However, you must never fight against the society itself enjoying such privileged legal rights.

The shameless corrupt politicians do such legal discriminations to keep different societies in their country  fighting with each other and rule them.

They practically believe in the dangerous policy of ‘Divide and rule’, even if they don’t admit it in so many words.

Such imprudent policies are not only dangerous to the societies that are not in the position to avail of such discriminatory legal rights; these are far more dangerous to the societies that are allowed to enjoy such legal rights.

The societies having less rights, always hate the societies having more rights, whether one likes it or not.

In India, it has resulted in profound hatred against Musalmīn.

Hindus inadvertently hate Musalmīn even if they are not aware of any such hatred they are nourishing against Musalmīn in their heart unknowingly.

The unscrupulous politicians understand it and deliberately nurse it so that they keep divided both the societies and rule them.

Musalmān women find other women have not to bear other women in their marital status as their co wives as they have to.

They become jealous of such women enjoying exclusive marital bliss.

And in their jealousy they go to the extent to attract their Hindu husband.

It happens more if the Musalmān husband, practicing polygamy, doesn’t do justice among his Musalmān wives.

The Musalmān wives, who don’t get justice from their Musalmān husband, find a Hindu lover for themselves both to punish their Musalmān husband and keep themselves happy.

In India, it’s more drastic as most of the Musalmīn here are either uneducated or under educated.

Why a Musalmān woman, if she were intelligent, prudent and smart, would opt for an uneducated/under educated  Musalmān husband while an equally intelligent, prudent and smart, highly educated Hindu husband/lover is available to her without any extra effort?

It brings hatred among loser Musalmīn against gaining Hindus.

The shrewd politicians again get benefits of ‘Divide and rule‘ policy, practically, even if they never accept it in so many words.

 Atharv Ved: Kaand 14| Sookt 1| Mantr 2

——————————————————————————

More Commentary on Ved from DSM Satyarthi:

1. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

2. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 1| Mantr 2

3. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 1| Mantr 3

4. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 5| Mantr 3

5. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 7| Mantr 5

6. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 7| Mantr 8

4. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 1

5. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 2

6. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 3

7. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 4

8. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 5

9. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 6

10. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 7

11. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 8

12.R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 9

13. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 33| Mantr 1

14. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 33| Mantr 2

14. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 58| Mantr 6

15. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 164| Mantr 20

16. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 164| Mantr 46

17. R’gved: Mandal 2| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

18 R’gved: Mandal 3| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

19. R’gved: Mandal 3| Sookt 6| Mantr 2

20. R’gved: Mandal 4| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

21. R’gved: Mandal 4| Sookt 26| Mantr 2

22. R’gved: Mandal 5| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

23. R’gved: Mandal 6| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

24. R’gved: Mandal 7| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

25. R’gved: Mandal 8| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

26. R’gved: Mandal 9| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

27. R’gved: Mandal 9| Sookt 63| Mantr 4-5

28. R’gved: Mandal 10| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

29. R’gved: Mandal 10| Sookt 85| Mantr 42

30. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 1| Mantr 1

31. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 1| Mantr 2

32. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 1| Mantr 3

33. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 1| Mantr 4

34. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 11| Mantr 1

35. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 13| Mantr 4

36. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 23| Mantr 3

37. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 31| Mantr 18

38. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 40| Mantr2

39. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 40| Mantr8

40. Saamved: Mantr 1

41. Sāmved: Mantr 115

42. Sāmved: Mantr 641: Mahānāmnyārchik| 1

43. Sāmved: Mantr 650: Mahānāmnyārchik| 10

44. Sāmved: Mantr 651: Uttarārchik

45. Atharv Ved: Kaand 1| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

46.  Atharv Ved: Kānd 3| Sookt 30| Mantr 3

47. Atharv Ved: Kānd 3| Sookt 30| Mantr 4

48. Atharv Ved: Kānd 3| Sookt 30| Mantr 6

49. Atharv Ved: Kānd 4| Sookt 4| Mantr 6

50. Atharv Ved: Kānd 4| Sookt 4| Mantr 7

51. Atharv Ved: Kānd 4| Sookt 4| Mantr 8

52. Atharv Ved: Kaand 4| Sookt 13| Mantr 1

53. Atharv Ved: Kaand 8| Sookt 1| Mantr 6

54. Atharv Ved: Kaand 8| Sookt 4| Mantr 22

55. Atharv Ved: Kaand 14| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

56. Atharv Ved: Kaand 14| Sookt 1| Mantr 2

57. Atharv Ved: Kaand 14| Sookt 1| Mantr 3

58. Atharv Ved: Kaand 14| Sookt 1| Mantr 4

59.  Atharv Ved: Kaand 14| Sookt 1| Mantr 22

60.Atharv Ved: Kaand 14| Sookt 2| Mantr 25