Should we really ban Islam?

Should we really ban Islam?

DSM Satyarthi

‘Islam is a cult.

It is time to wake up and realize that this cult is a threat to mankind and there can be no co-existence with Muslims.

As long as Muslims believe in Muhammad, they are a threat to others and to themselves.

Muslims must either leave Islam, discard their culture of hate and join the rest of mankind as fellow humans, or non-Muslims must separate themselves from them, ban Islam, end the immigration of Muslims and send home those who plot against democracy and refuse to integrate.’

 

These are the words, word by word, written by Dr. Ali Sina in his most important book, ‘Understanding Muħammad: A Psychobiography of Allah’s prophet’ on page 7.

I won’t go in the useless time consuming discussion whether Dr. Ali Sina is right or Islam.

I want to discuss here about the solutions of Dr. Ali Sina he has proposed to get rid of the problems the entire humanity is facing, due to Islam, in his well-perused opinion.

I promise not to deviate from it, unless it isn’t utmost necessary.

 

Dr. Ali Sina’s solutions are:

Firstly, Muslims must leave Islam, discard their culture of hate and join the rest of mankind as fellow humans.

Isn’t it against Democracy not to let Muslims decide what they themselves must do?

Of course, we can’t, and we shouldn’t ever, let any human society, Muslims or someone else whosoever, to have a culture of hate against any human group whatsoever.

Yet, should we do it by banning that particular society or by teaching and punishing her if she still acts against humanity?

We should never forget, as for as India is concerned, Indian Muslims have contributed to make present Indian society in a very big manner.

They never hated their fellow citizens Hindus as we find in other countries.

If they had, India couldn’t have been a Hindu Majority country still now.

Even the too much-fussed Two Nation Theory of Muħammad Ålī Jinnah could not make entire Musalmīn to leave India and go to Pakistan.

Can anyone say today that Indian Musalmīn don’t love India, instead they love Pakistan more?

Why Dr. Ali Sina’s theory that Islam itself is a culture of hate never worked in India?

 

It isn’t a simple question to be ignored in a general way.

Instead, I claim it’s the utmost important question that must be answered before planning any campaign to abolish Islam herself from everywhere.

 

Why Dr. Ali Sina’s theory that Islam itself is a culture of hate never worked in India?

Islam was always one of the most popular ideologies in India in Hindus even.

The Hindus go to Ajmer Sharīf more, than even the Musalmīn do.

Isn’t it a fact?

Apply Dr. Ali Sina’s theory that Islam itself is a culture of hate and explain this phenomenon in India.

You can’t avoid it.

You can’t ignore it ever.

 

Isn’t it a fact that the first holy war of Independence of India was fought in 1857 under the leadership of the great Mughal Emperor, Bahādur Shah Zafar?

If Hindus were hated by the Musalmīn and had really suffered in their rule, why the hell they wanted to establish Muslim rule against the then East India Company rule?

Why their leader wasn’t some Hindu, instead of Bahādur Shah Zafar?

 

Shouldn’t Dr. Ali Sina and his co authors explain this historical phenomenon in India?

 

Dr. Ali Sina’s second proposed solution to the Pseudo Islamic terrorism is:

Non-Muslims must separate themselves from Muslims, ban Islam, end the immigration of Muslims and send home those who plot against democracy and refuse to integrate.’

It is exactly what was done in Partition of India.

Non Muslims didn’t separate themselves from Muslims, but the Pseudo Musalmīn then themselves separated from then Hindus.

Somewhat the same thing is still being done by present day Pseudo Musalmīn everywhere.

It isn’t even needed now for Non Musalmīn to separate Muslims from them.

The ever stupid Pseudo Musalmīn are already doing it themselves everywhere and deliberately, either clandestinely or openly, conspiring against Non Muslims, plotting terrorist activities against them.

These ever stupid Pseudo Musalmīn are not creative, not productive, neither they want to be ever.

They even don’t understand no human society can survive herself if she isn’t creative and productive.

They only want to kill the Non Muslims so that they themselves can get Jannat.

Does Islam really preach this ever anti-human doctrine?

 

Dr. Ali Sina and his co authors say ‘Yes’.

Yet, the learned persons who have really perused Islam without any bias, say ‘No, Certainly Not’.

Al Qur’an Al Karīm says:

Muħammadurrasūlullāhi.

Wallazīn måhu Ashiddao Ǻlā alkuffāri ruħmāo baynahum.’

Muħammad is the Messenger of Allah.

And those with him are severe against Al Kuffār, Merciful among themselves.’

Al Qur’an Al Karīm : 48 Al Fatħ| 29

Pseudo Musalmīn terrorists and criminal/criminal minded Pseudo Musalmīn have interpreted this āyat-e-Karīmah in their favor that this āyat-e-Karīmah orders them to kill the non Musalmīn.

They go ahead further and quote one more āyat from Al Qur’an Al Karīm to support their vile interests:

Fa qatulū almusharikīn

ħaisu wajadttumūhum.’

 Then kill the associators

wherever you find them.

Al Qur’an Al Kareem: 9 Attawbah|5

 

Well, it’s the interpretation Yazīd MalåūnǺrab

Burdāfaroshs and their supporters Mullahs and Maulavīs allotted to it

They damn cared if this interpretation of this āyat-e-Karīmah is against Al Qur’an Al Kareem itself.*

 

The Pseudo Musalmīn terrorists and criminal/criminal minded Pseudo Musalmīn keep repeating only two āyat-e-karīmahs:

Muħammadurrasūlullāhi.

Wallazīn måhu Ashiddao Ǻlā alkuffāri ruħmāo baynahum.’

Muħammad is the Messenger of Allah.

And those with him are severe against Al Kuffār, Merciful among themselves.’

Al Qur’an Al Karīm : 48 Al Fatħ| 29

 ‘Fa qatulū almusharikīn

ħaisu wajadttumūhum’

Then kill the associators

wherever you find them

 —Al Qur’an Al Kareem: 9 Attawbah|5

They keep repeating these two āyat-e-karīmahs as if the entire Islam is centralized on these two āyat-e-karīmahs.

Is it true?

Anyone who has really perused Islam without any bias, without any prejudice, can tell everyone it isn’t.

Isn’t it a negative approach of these PseudoMusalmīn terrorists and criminal/criminal minded PseudoMusalmīn to their own religion if their claim is taken prima facie?

 

Now, let’s analyze their claim itself.

How many PseudoMusalmīn terrorists and criminal/criminal minded Pseudo Musalmīn are there in the entire Ummat-eMuslimah?

51%?

More?

49%?

Less?

What about the rest of the Musalmīn who aren’t Pseudo Musalmīn terrorists and criminal/criminal minded Pseudo Musalmīn, neither they ever were?

Why should they suffer for something they haven’t done ever?

Because their fellow religionists did it?

Is it justice to them?

 

What the hell we want?

To face their injustice with our own injustice?

Then how the hell are we better than Pseudo Musalmīn terrorists and criminal/criminal minded Pseudo Musalmīn?

Can’t we really teach them humanity?

Can’t even we punish them if they refuse to learn?

The entire humankind can’t do it?

Are the Pseudo Musalmīn terrorists and criminal/criminal minded PseudoMusalmīn so much large in number?

Are they so much capable in resources even?

Isn’t what I propose more justified, more rational, more logical, more practical and more human?

 

Why compel even the Musalmīn that believe in humanity to join these inhuman PseudoMusalmīn terrorists and criminal/criminal minded Pseudo Musalmīn?

 

Isn’t that’s what you are proposing to do?

 

Even if I believe, though I can’t be so insane ever to believe it, what you say:

Every Musalmān is a terrorist or a potential terrorist.’

Isn’t it smarter to break the unity of our common enemy?

If a large number of such Musalmīn claim they aren’t with these wretched animals, the Pseudo Musalmīn terrorists and criminal/criminal minded Pseudo Musalmīn, why shouldn’t we take advantage of it?

Why should we send them too to our enemy’s camp?

To strengthen our enemy’s capability to fight with us more effectively?

Must be us so stupid?

I don’t think so.

I can’t even imagine to think as stupid as it’s being proposed.

———————————————————-

Islam according to Ved

More from DSM Satyarthi:

1. On Islam

2. On History

3.  Commentary on Ved

4. More On Hinduism

5. Science Fiction

6.  Creative Adult Sex in English from Durgesh

7. Durgesh in Hindi/Urdu

Innallāh lā yahdī alqawmalfāsiqīn

Innallāh lā yahdī alqawmalfāsiqīn

 

In fact, Allah guideth not the fāsiqīn,

who bring chaos

 

DSM Satyarthi

Al Qur’an Al Karīm specifically and expressly deals with the persons that are not honest, not sincere, in their interaction with other persons.

Its 63rd Sūrat, Al Munāfiqūn, especially deals of such persons.

The Musalmīn of India are facing nowadays a severe political problem.

After 67 years of Independence of India, they are now feeling that they are cheated so long politically by their so called well wisher, pseudo seculars.

Who is responsible for it?

Their so called well wisher, pseudo seculars?

Certainly not.

Never blunder once again.

We, Musalmīn, ourselves, are responsible for it, none else.

Al Qur’an Al Karīm guides us ab initio:

Ihdi nassirātal mustaqīm

‘Guide us to the straight path.’

1 Al Fātiħah: 6

Sirātallazīn anåmt ålayhim ghairimaghzūbi ålayhim wa lā azzwāllīn

The path of the persons who earned your bounty, not of those who evoked your wrath, nor of those who go astray.’

1 Al Fātiħah: 7

Now, let’s analyze our past 67 years.

What the hell we did in this wretched period that these munāfiqīn could succeed in cheating us so successfully?

Why Allah didn’t guide us the ‘sirātal mustaqīm’, the straight path’?

 

Did, nauzbillah, Allah Himself has cheated us too?

It can’t be.

Allah never cheats someone who never cheats Him.

Alħamdulillāhi Rabbil åālmīn.

So, now we enter in the troubling zone.

Have we ourselves cheated Allah, therefore Allah cheated us?

Are we fāsiqīn, the persons who bring chaos that consequently Allah didn’t guide us?

Well, let’s think honestly, sincerely, not for others, for ourselves at least.

Can we be sincere to ourselves at least?

Is it possible Allah has punished us for our indefinite persistent tolerance to terrorism in His name?

Why the hell shouldn’t He?

Innallāh lā yahdī alqawmalfāsiqīn

In fact, Allah guideth not the fāsiqīn,

who bring chaos.

Al Qur’an Al Karīm: 63|6

Isn’t it clear thus also why Allah doesn’t guide the terrorists and criminals?

They too are fāsiqīn in Allah’s eyes.

Try to explain why otherwise they aren’t guided.

Isn’t it a fact that:

Wallāhu yakħtassu biraħmatihi man yashāu

And Allah selects for His Mercy whom He wills

─ 2 Al Baqarah| 105

Not whom the Musalmīn/Ummat-eMuslimah wills.

We forgot it.

Yet our forgetting some law doesn’t imply ever that Allah does too forget it.

We have to follow Allah’s constitution, Allah doesn’t have to follow whatever the hell we understand erroneously due to our vile vested interests.

Wallāhu zul fazlil åzīmi

And Allah is of great bounty.’

─ 2 Al Baqarah| 105

——————————————————————————————————-

Islam according to Ved

More from DSM Satyarthi:

1. On Islam

2. On History

3.  Commentary on Ved

4. More On Hinduism

5. Science Fiction

6.  Creative Adult Sex in English from Durgesh

7. Durgesh in Hindi/Urdu

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Al Muħammad Al Qāsim’s utmost greedy relatives

Al Muħammad Al Qāsim’s

 utmost greedy relatives

  1.    Al Nadīm Al Quddūs Al Muħammad Al Qāsim’ half/real brother
  2.     Al Safiyah Al Ghaus Al Nadīm Al Quddūs’s awfully stunning wife, a mastermind, ex hostess of Las Vegas Nevada gambling house, the real brain power against Al Waħīdah Al Tawīd and Al Muħammad Al Qāsim.
  3.        Al Zakiyah Al Qāsim, Al Muħammad Al Qāsim’s sister
  4.          Vikram Bachhalyā, Al Zakiyah Al Qāsim’s husband
  5.           Al Lubnā Al Qāsim, Al Muħammad Al Qāsim’s one more sister
  6.           Pratāp Bachhalyā, Al Lubnā Al Qāsim’s husband
  7.          Al Hudā Al Qāsim Al Hāshmī, their advocate
  8.          Naåīmah Muħammad Ħasan, Al Safiyah Al Ghaus’s friend, philosopher and guide
  9. Naåīmah Muħammad Ħasan’s Seven Movements

—————————————————————

1. More Creative Adult Sex in English from Durgesh

2.Durgesh in Hindi/Urdu

3. Science Fiction

4. On History

5. Commentary on Ved

6. On Hinduism

7. On Islam

TafsīlAlKitābi

TafsīlAlKitābi

A detailed explanation of the Scripture

DSM Satyarthi

Va mā kān hāzalqur’anu anyuftarā min dūnillāhi va lākin tasdīqallazī bayn yadéhi va tafsīlAlKitābi lā raib fīhi min rabbil åālmīn.’

And it was not for this Qur’an to be produced by other than Allah , but a confirmation of what was before it and a detailed explanation of The Scripture, about which there is no doubt, from the Lord of the worlds.’

̶—Al Qur’an Al Kareem10 Yunus:37

——————————————————————————

More on Islam from DSM Sayarthi:

1. Bal huv qur’anum majeedun fe LAUHIM MAHFOOZIN

2. Innahu laquranun kareemun Fee kitabin maknoonin

3. ‘Hudallilmuttaqeen’: ‘Guidance for controllers of organs’: 2 Al Baqarah: 2

4. ‘Alaa qalbik litakoon minal-munzireen’ ‘upon your heart one of who to warn’

5. Islam according to Qur’an and Maulana Maududi rahamatullh alaihi

Ashiddao Ǻlā alkuffāri ruħmāo baynahum

Ashiddao Ǻlā alkuffāri

ruħmāo baynahum

Severe against Kuffār

Merciful among themselves

DSM Satyarthi

Al Qur’an Al Kareem Sūrat Al Fataħ 48:29 states:

Muħammadurrasūlullāhi.

Wallazīn måhu Ashiddao Ǻlā alkuffāri ruħmāo baynahum.’

Muħammad is the Messenger of Allah.

And those with him are severe against Al Kuffār, Merciful among themselves.’

Musalmān terrorists and criminal/criminal

minded Musalmīn have interpreted this āyat-e-Karīmah in their favor that this āyat-e-Karīmah orders them to kill the non Musalmīn.

Well, it’s the interpretation Yazīd Malåūn, Ǻrab Burdāfaroshs and their supporters Mullahs and Maulavīs allotted to it.

They damn cared if this interpretation of this āyat-e-Karīmah is against Al Qur’an Al Kareem itself.

——————————————————————————–

More from DSM Satyarthi:

1. On Islam

2. On History

3.  Commentary on Ved

4. More On Hinduism

5. Science Fiction

6.  Creative Adult Sex in English from Durgesh

7. Durgesh in Hindi/Urdu

Ayesha Ahmed disagrees with the Women’s High status and Privileged Position

Ayesha Ahmed disagrees

with the

Women’s High status

and Privileged Position

DSM Satyarthi

Some of my readers have taken the trouble to inform me that an article of Ayesha Ahmed is not available to them when they click the link I’ve given to them in some of my writings.

I don’t know why it is so, if it is so.

However, I copy paste that article here for their, as well as others’ benefit, as I have previously did for some of the writings of my intimate friends Khadijah Muhammad and Sidrah Ahmad:

Women’s High status and

Privileged Position

by Ayesha Ahmed : Aug 2, 2003 :

Dear sisters: How many times have you heard this claim “sisters, you should be very happy that you have a very high status and a very privileged position in our religion” by the bearded ones in the mosques?

God alone knows what high status and which privileged position they talk about….

To be declared in the holy books that we are deficient in intelligence and that most of us will go to hell for being ungrateful to our husbands; and that we will make the big majority of the hell’s population?

To be told to share the husband with three other wives and many concubines, sex slaves and captive women which his right hand posses?

To be divorced by him at the drop of a hat by just his proclaiming 3 times “I divorce you” and we not having the same right to divorce him?

Husband getting 72 perpetually virgin beautiful houris with big eyes and swelling bosoms in the paradise and we getting the same old husband and share him with the 72 voluptuous houris? (Believe me sisters; he will be so busy there with the lovely houris that the only time he will see you will be in the hallways when he is going from one houri’s room to another houri’s room).

To be disciplined by the husband, by being beaten up by him with scourge (lash) and green sticks? (Unless you are into the kinky stuff and actually enjoy the beatings)..

Being raped and then be stoned to death for reporting it because you need 4 male witnesses to prove your innocence otherwise you yourself get accused of adultery? (Your only chance of finding 4 male witnesses is that if the attacker was of very low IQ or was really drunk and attacked you in the broad daylight in front of a bunch of degenerate horny men who watched and cheered and are later willing to testify)

Being wrongly accused of adultery by a conniving husband and be stoned for it because he does not need 4 male witnesses if he swears 4 times himself?

Being married at the age of 9 years to a much older man because it is sunna? To submit to him every time he desires you even if he wants it on the back of a camel, if he gets an untimely urge? (Not recommended, you both may fall down from camel’s back during the action and sustain injuries).

Being cursed all night by thousands of angels if you refuse him even for a genuine reason? (What a boring job for angels who are assigned to watch your bedroom, always waiting for the action, unless of course they enjoy watching; in that case they have a reason to be disappointed and pissed by your refusal).

To be declared half a person as witness in court or inheriting property?

To be asked to stay at home by scriptures and only leave home if husband permits; that too fully covered by a tent like garment even if it is scorching hot (hey, sweating is good for you as it opens skin pores, besides the tent covering protects you from the hot sun and elements which keeps you fair and beautiful; sisters you need all the help you can get to compete with the other wives and concubines).

The Muslim Beauties are wooing Hindu Men FASTEST

—————————————————————————————

More from DSM Satyarthi:

1.  Commentary on Ved

2. More On Hinduism

3. On Islam

4. On History

5. Science Fiction

6.  Creative Adult Sex in English from Durgesh

7. Durgesh in Hindi/Urdu

Ved: 4 Atharv Ved: Kānd 14| Vivāh Kānd: Sookt 1| Mantr 2

Ved: Ved Bhāshý

4 Atharv Ved

 Kānd 14 Vivāh Kānd:

 Sūkt 1| Mantr 2

DSM Satyarthi

—————————————————————————————————————

1By Som  Ādityās strong2 by Som Earth great3

No doubt4, in the genital organ of these constellations5, Som is established optimum6.

————————————————————————————————–

1.R’shikā: Sūryā Sāvitrī

Dévtā/ Divine Subject: Som

Chhand/Meter: Anushŧup

2. Ved is revealed in a telegraphic language, not in any ordinary language.

This basic fact, about Ved, always must be remembered while studying Ved gravely.

I’m sorry to say that the Westerners never studied Ved gravely.

I’m sorrier to say that the Westerners were never serious not only about Ved.

They were never equally serious about Bible and Qur’an too, as well.

These scriptures were never seriously studied by the Westerners.

If they were ever studied seriously, by the Westerners; the Western Culture, now on the path of its certain suicide, would never were on its suicidal path.

It was an unfortunate tragedy that when Ved, Bible and Qur’an were being studied by the Westerners, the Communism was fighting its own war of survival with religion.

It made the Communist thinkers more biased those days than they are not biased even today.

No biased studies should be taken seriously ever.

Yet, isn’t it a tragedy that, the entirely biased studies of those days, by the Communist thinkers are still being taken seriously?

Isn’t it a time to re-study Ved, Bible, Qur’an and the related literature more seriously, scientifically and absolutely unbiased, for a change?

We have one more benefit the Communist thinkers of those days didn’t have.

The Communism in those days was utopian somewhat, even after the great scientific studies Karl Marx and Frederick Engels did then.

It was not a scientific fact, known those days that, the Multiverse is made of vibrations of energy basically.

This fact, revealed and accepted scientifically afterwards, has changed the entire scenario of scientific studies about the matters the Communist thinkers had done their studies.

Marriage institution is also one of them.

The persons who have studied Western Culture seriously know very well that the Western Culture does not stand on scientific grounds only.

In fact, no culture can ever stand on scientific grounds only howsoever it insists to stand.

Any theory, any fact, when it is brought into practice always succumbs to human emotions prevailing those days.

It has to.

It hasn’t another option if it has to come into practice.

Humans never react scientifically only.

Neither can they ever do it.

Scientific facts are never emotional until they are facts only.

As soon as they are brought into practice they have to deal with the humans.

Humans include both males and females.

Not only females are emotional ones, the males are also not very different in the matter.

No doubt, the females are more emotionals than the males.

Nevertheless, even the males are not devoid of emotions absolutely.

Hence, any scientific fact, however factually it is known to us, when brought into practice, is bound to succumb to the emotional needs of the humans those are bringing it into practice.

That’s why the theory and practice always differ howsoever honest its implementers are.

That’s why even Eīshān Param Brahm Paramātmā has instructed us not to confine ourselves to the principles only i.e. Ved, but  to the very Mission of Life/ExistenceKr’ñvanto VishvamāryamDharm Santānam, Dharm Sansthāpan, as well; to bring the principles into practice and study Divý Itihās, the Divine History for it:

  1. Dhiyo yo nah prachodayāt
  2. Yāthātathyatah

This fact, once realized in its full form, can immensely help us to re-study about marriage institution once opposed by the Communist thinkers so insistently, so persistently.

The Communist thinkers of those days found marriage institution an immensely avoidable obstacle in their pathway to Communism.

They thought marriage institutions give birth to Private Property.

The Communist thinkers were right.

But they were not right in thinking that the family was the only institution that caused the accumulation of Private Property.

Moreover, owing to immense drastic failure of communist economic, social and political system around the entire globe, we have to think more gravely now do we really need to oppose private property anymore.

Aren’t the financial scams, not done by the advocates of Private Property, more serious, more dangerous and more destructive to the humanity and Democracy than the Private Property itself is?

We should never forget that the destruction of Private Property absolutely, leads to destroy the family itself.

Frederick Engels has already written in the subject as much as we don’t need any analysis more to understand the subject comprehensively.

We need Private Property to protect and safeguard a family.

We have no other option to it.

Consequently, why not support Welfare Capitalism and State Capitalism instead of opposing Private Property?

We have experienced bitterly that our industries can’t survive in so-called Communism.

Moreover, we have experienced bitterly too that Communism has led to a totalitarianism called Stalinism now.

We need industries to go ahead.

In fact, we need industries to march ahead.

The Welfare Capitalism and State Capitalism are more suitable for it then the so-called Communism or the ‘Socialism’ prone to nonstop Scams.

Shouldn’t we think over it more gravely now?

Today, we can easily observe around us that even the singles have Private Property.

Moreover, to be more exactly honest and sincere, the entire history of humankind has proven now that the singles crave for Private Property even more than the married persons do.

Why is it so?

Because the married persons have their family to take care of them in their old age, while the singles don’t.

They have only their money to take care of them in their old age.

It is the reason why the singles are found more corrupt than the married persons in accumulating Private Property and wealth.

That’s why Hinduism does not support single life, except only when a single can’t afford even a single wife.

It specifically orders:

S’ nah pitév sūnavé’gné sūpāyano bhav,

Sachasvā nah svastayé.’

‘He, be unto us, as a father to son, Agni, easy to access.

Be together optimum, properly, for our welfare.’

—      Ved: R’gved: 1| 1| 9

Ihaiv stam mā vi yaushŧam vishvamāyurvyashnutam,

Krīdantau putrairnaptr’bhirmodmānau své gr’hé.’

‘Abide ye both only here. Don’t be separated. Enjoy whole life sporting with sons grandsons, rejoicing in own home.’

—      Ved: R’gved: 10| 85| 42

Ihaiv stam mā vi yaushŧam vishvamāyurvyashnutam,

Krīdantau putrairnaptr’bhirmodmānau svastakau.’

‘Abide ye both only here. Don’t be separated. Enjoy whole life sporting with sons grandsons4, rejoicing in the lovely home.’

—      Ved: Atharv Ved: 14|1|22

The Communist thinkers never thought, neither they could, in those days of too limited resources to research anything that, marriage institution was not the only vice in their pathway to Communism.

In fact, the singles are more severe problems in their way.

The Communist thinkers wildly opposed marriage institution and family.

In fact they are still opposing it blindly, not even realizing the fact that the entire history of humankind has already proven them wrong now.

The Communism as a movement has lost its original momentum now.

It is not because it’s nonsense, as it’s claimed by its blind communal opponents.

The Communism as a movement is not nonsense.

It is necessary for the uplifting of the downtroddens.

Even Hinduism has the same goal as The Communism as a movement has.

The point where Hinduism differs with the Communism as a movement is not its goal, its means of implementation instead.

So, the Communism as a movement doesn’t need to oppose either marriage institution or family ever to achieve its mission.

Hinduism, Islam, Judaism, Christianity, in fact no religion, basically, is in opposition to the Communism as a movement, at all.

The Communism as a movement believed that the mission could be achieved through the dictatorship of the laborers.

The subsequent history of humankind has now expressly proven that such a belief of the then Communists was wrong.

Why?

Because, as already said, the Communism was then only a theory.

It was never practiced by its propellers.

Every theory when it is brought into practice, always refines itself.

No theorist can ever anticipate, absolutely and flawlessly, what lies in its pathway in future.

After all, every theorist, whatsoever theory he/she propels, is a human being, and bound to remain a human being.

A human being is not an omniscient, neither he/she ever can be.

So, howsoever the theory he/she proposes is flawless when propelled, it’s bound to prove in future that it wasn’t so.

The laborers never knew how the enterprises are built up and run.

If they had known how to build up enterprises and how to run them, they would have already done it without any help of the Communist thinkers.

Why have they waited for the moment the Communist thinkers declare them the dictators of a country?

To build up any enterprise first of all an enterpriser has to dream of it to the extent that it becomes an obsession to him/her.

Until and unless it isn’t an obsession to him even an enterpriser can’t build up any enterprise let alone any laborer or a group of laborers.

An enterpriser builds up his/her enterprise first in his/her own mind with its each and every minutest details.

He is so obsessed with these minutest details that, he sees it in his mind.

This imaginary vision in his/her mind always exists in his/her mind while he/she attempts to bring it into fact.

Until and unless this obsession does not become his/her madness, he/she can’t bring into existence.

It’s also a labor, the original Communist thinkers never realized.

That’s why when they took hold of the excellently running enterprises and put them under the dictatorship of the laborers, even the excellently running enterprises failed to continue.

The dictators lacked this vision, this obsession, and this madness.

It was the oxygen an enterpriser supplies to the enterprises.

Unfortunately only he/she can do it, none else.

The Communist thinkers never realized it.

The Communist thinkers made the laborers dictators on the shrewd persons who knew very well how to win the obstacles in their pathways.

They bribed the laborers in administration heavily.

The laborers in administration had never seen money.

They surrendered to the bribery of shrewdest businesspersons.

The movement started suffering heavily.

And ultimately it flopped.

It had to.

The laborers in administration were most of the persons who were everlosers.*

Watch your present day politicians.

Who are they?

Isn’t it a fact that most of them are the persons who are highly Uneducated/Under educated?

Isn’t it a fact that so many of them are criminal/criminal minded?

Why is it so?

Because most of the laborers in administration were dictators, but the persons they dictated were shrewder and more efficient.

The businesspersons became kingmakers instead of kings.

Apparently the businesspersons were not administrators, the chosen representatives of the people were.

But the businesspersons were kingmakers and shrewder.

The dictatorship of the Uneducated/Under educated ones, on shrewder persons, made itself ineffective.

Administration requires prudence.

The laborers in administration hadn’t developed it.

The system, consequently, failed.

It had to.*

Ved: 4 Atharv Ved: Kānd 14| Vivāh Kānd: Sookt 1| Mantr 3

——————————————————————————

More Commentary on Ved from DSM Satyarthi:

1. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

2. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 1| Mantr 2

3. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 1| Mantr 3

4. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 5| Mantr 3

5. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 7| Mantr 5

6. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 7| Mantr 8

4. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 1

5. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 2

6. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 3

7. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 4

8. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 5

9. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 6

10. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 7

11. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 8

12.R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 9

13. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 33| Mantr 1

14. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 33| Mantr 2

14. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 58| Mantr 6

15. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 164| Mantr 20

16. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 164| Mantr 46

17. R’gved: Mandal 2| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

18 R’gved: Mandal 3| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

19. R’gved: Mandal 3| Sookt 6| Mantr 2

20. R’gved: Mandal 4| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

21. R’gved: Mandal 4| Sookt 26| Mantr 2

22. R’gved: Mandal 5| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

23. R’gved: Mandal 6| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

24. R’gved: Mandal 7| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

25. R’gved: Mandal 8| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

26. R’gved: Mandal 9| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

27. R’gved: Mandal 9| Sookt 63| Mantr 4-5

28. R’gved: Mandal 10| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

29. R’gved: Mandal 10| Sookt 85| Mantr 42

30. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 1| Mantr 1

31. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 1| Mantr 2

32. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 1| Mantr 3

33. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 1| Mantr 4

34. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 11| Mantr 1

35. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 13| Mantr 4

36. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 23| Mantr 3

37. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 31| Mantr 18

38. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 40| Mantr2

39. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 40| Mantr8

40. Saamved: Mantr 1

41. Sāmved: Mantr 115

42. Sāmved: Mantr 641: Mahānāmnyārchik| 1

43. Sāmved: Mantr 650: Mahānāmnyārchik| 10

44. Sāmved: Mantr 651: Uttarārchik

45. Atharv Ved: Kaand 1| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

46.  Atharv Ved: Kānd 3| Sookt 30| Mantr 3

47. Atharv Ved: Kānd 3| Sookt 30| Mantr 4

48. Atharv Ved: Kānd 3| Sookt 30| Mantr 6

49. Atharv Ved: Kānd 4| Sookt 4| Mantr 6

50. Atharv Ved: Kānd 4| Sookt 4| Mantr 7

51. Atharv Ved: Kānd 4| Sookt 4| Mantr 8

52. Atharv Ved: Kaand 4| Sookt 13| Mantr 1

53. Atharv Ved: Kaand 8| Sookt 1| Mantr 6

54. Atharv Ved: Kaand 8| Sookt 4| Mantr 22

55. Atharv Ved: Kaand 14| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

56. Atharv Ved: Kaand 14| Sookt 1| Mantr 2

57. Atharv Ved: Kaand 14| Sookt 1| Mantr 3

58. Atharv Ved: Kaand 14| Sookt 1| Mantr 4

59.  Atharv Ved: Kaand 14| Sookt 1| Mantr 22

60.Atharv Ved: Kaand 14| Sookt 2| Mantr 25

How to establish ‘Rām Rājý’/ Ħukūmat-e-Ilāhī/The Kingdom of God

How to establish ‘Rām Rājý’/

Ħukūmat-e-Ilāhī/The Kingdom of

God

DSM Satyarthi

The basic question arises, when we talk of establishing ‘Rām Rājý’/ Ħukūmat-e-Ilāhī/ the Kingdom of God, is why an atheist must be interested in it.

If you please forgive me for my bluntness and bitter truth, I want to ask a question myself.

Why is an atheist afraid of it so much?

The atheists are not in majority on the Globe.

Then why do they expect the Hindus/the Musalmīn/the Christians/the Jews/the Pārasīs to surrender to them?

Why do they want to rule on the entire Hindus/ Musalmīn/ Christians/ Jews/ Pārasīs?

Isn’t it itself wrong on its face?

The next question an atheist may ask is how it is possible.

Hindus/ Musalmīn/ Christians/ Jews/ Pārasīs would never agree.*

Why the hell won’t they?

They are not fighting with each other themselves.

Their atheist politicians are constantly keeping them divided, with nonstop tremendous efforts, to rule them.

Yes, ostensibly their politicians are not atheists.

They are too one of them ostensibly.

However, most of the Hindus/ Musalmīn/ Christians/ Jews/ Pārasīs are not aware of the actual truth that it’s ostensibly only.

Actually, their politicians are not, and were never, one of them.

They have their own ruling class actually.

They claim profoundly that they are too the Hindus/ Musalmīn/ Christians/ Jews/ Pārasīs, as the others are.

Nevertheless, if you yourselves scrutinize the activities of your politicians, you would be immensely surprised to find out that it isn’t, neither was it ever, the actual truth.

Their politicians are never devoted to Hinduism, Islam, Christianity, Judaism and/or Persianism.

They only claim to be so.

Whenever their own vile personal political interests are on stake, their politicians usually invariably sacrifice the interests of Hinduism, Islam, Christianity, Judaism and/or Persianism.

Why is it so if they are really Hindus/ Musalmīn/ Christians/ Jews/ Pārasīs, as they claim profoundly to be so?

 

The politicians of Hindus/ Musalmīn/ Christians/ Jews/ Pārasīs customarily demand immense sacrifices from Hindus/ Musalmīn/ Christians/ Jews/ Pārasīs to save Hinduism, Islam, Christianity, Judaism and/or Persianism.

Don’t they every now and then?

However, they themselves have never sacrificed their vile personal and political interests for the same cause.

Don’t the politicians of Hindus/ Musalmīn/ Christians/ Jews/ Pārasīs have this common attitude to it?

Haven’t you ever noticed it?

They are dividing you not for Hinduism, Islam, Christianity, Judaism and/or Persianism.

They are doing it for their own vile personal political interests.

It’s detrimental to yourself, your spouse(s) and your children, your entire family.

Hinduism, Islam, Christianity, Judaism and/or Persianism are there to protect you, your spouse(s) and your children, Not ever to destroy.

Consequently, stop fighting with each other immediately for these vile communal purposes.

It has never served your community even infinitesimal.

You’d find the road to establish Rām Rājý’/

Ħukūmat-e-Ilāhī/The Kingdom of God is clearer to you than it was ever.

—————————————————————————————–

More thought provoking articles from DSM Satyarthi:

1. Why can’t we love each other?: Innallāh yuħibbul muttaqīn

2. Should we advocate abolishing religion from planet earth?

3. Does religion provide false security?

4. Polygamy: a discarded system of life

5. The hidden agenda of Congress

6.No danger from RSS. The real danger is from anti Hindus

7. Voting for a satellite government?

————————————————————————————

1. More On Hinduism

2. On Islam

3. On History

4. Commentary on Ved

5. Science Fiction

6.  Creative Adult Sex in English from Durgesh

7. Durgesh in Hindi/Urdu

————————————————————-

More on Hinduism from DSM Satyarthi:

1. ‘Bhoorbhuvah svah!’ ‘The Existence! The Consciousness! The Bliss!’

2.‘Devasy’ pashy’ kaavyam, n’ mamaar, n’ jeeryati.’

3. Hinduism shines

4.Ved is the eternal law book having infinite knowledge in it for human beings

5. ‘According to facts’: ‘Yaathaatathyatah’

6. ‘SET THIS WOMAN for WELL DOER’: ‘Imaam naareem Sukr’te dadhaat’

7. The Evernew Hinduism: Yaathaatathyatah: Ved 2|40|8

8. ‘How to cross death’: ‘Tamev viditvaati mr’tyumeti’: Ved2Yajurved|31|18

9. According to Hinduism: We must be polite, not coward

10.Ye yathaa maam prapadyante taanstathaiv bhajaamyaham: Lord Kr’shn

11. N’ karm lipyaté naré

—————————————————————————————————

More on Islam from DSM Satyarthi:

1. Bal huv qur’anum majeedun fe LAUHIM MAHFOOZIN

2. Innahu laquranun kareemun Fee kitabin maknoonin

3. ‘Hudallilmuttaqeen’: ‘Guidance for controllers of organs’: 2 Al Baqarah: 2

4. ‘Alaa qalbik litakoon minal-munzireen’ ‘upon your heart one of who to warn’

5. Muslimahs! Come to India. I recommend Hindu lovers for all the Muslimahs.: Khadeejah Muhammad

6. Islam according to Qur’an and Maulana Maududi rahamatullh alaihi

7. A Moment of grave thinking for the entire sophisticated Muslim Community

8. ‘SET THIS WOMAN for WELL DOER’: ‘Imaam naareem Sukr’te dadhaat’

9. ‘V’ innahu fe UMMALKITAABI ladainaa la’liyyun hakeemun’: 43/4

10. Most Present day Muslms don’t do what Huzoor(SAW) did:

11. The Muslim beauties are wooing Hindu men FASTEST

12. ‘What really matters in the sight of God’: Maulana: Maududi

13. Why did Islam face a counter revolution at Karbala?

14. Why there are differences among us?

15. No differences Please!

16. Llā yamassuhu illā almutahharūn

———————————————————————-

More Commentary on Ved from DSM Satyarthi:

1. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

2. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 1| Mantr 2

3. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 5| Mantr 3

4. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 5| Mantr 3

5. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 7| Mantr 5

6. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 7| Mantr 8

4. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 1

5. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 2

6. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 3

7. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 4

8. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 5

9. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 6

10. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 7

11. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 8

12.R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 9

13. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 58| Mantr 6

14. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 164| Mantr 20

15. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 164| Mantr 46

16. R’gved: Mandal 2| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

17 R’gved: Mandal 3| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

18. R’gved: Mandal 3| Sookt 6| Mantr 2

19. R’gved: Mandal 4| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

20. R’gved: Mandal 4| Sookt 26| Mantr 2

21. R’gved: Mandal 5| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

22. R’gved: Mandal 6| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

23. R’gved: Mandal 7| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

24. R’gved: Mandal 8| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

25. R’gved: Mandal 9| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

26. R’gved: Mandal 9| Sookt 63| Mantr 4-5

27. R’gved: Mandal 10| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

28. R’gved: Mandal 10| Sookt 85| Mantr 42

29. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 1| Mantr 1

30. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 1| Mantr 2

31. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 1| Mantr 3

32. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 1| Mantr 4

33. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 11| Mantr 1

34. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 13| Mantr 4

35. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 23| Mantr 3

36. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 31| Mantr 18

37. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 40| Mantr2

38. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 40| Mantr8

39. Saamved: Mantr 1

40. Sāmved: Mantr 115

41. Sāmved: Mantr 641: Mahānāmnyārchik| 1

42. Sāmved: Mantr 650: Mahānāmnyārchik| 10

43. Sāmved: Mantr 651: Uttarārchik

44. Atharv Ved: Kaand 1| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

45.  Atharv Ved: Kānd 3| Sookt 30| Mantr 3

46. Atharv Ved: Kānd 3| Sookt 30| Mantr 4

47. Atharv Ved: Kānd 3| Sookt 30| Mantr 6

48. Atharv Ved: Kānd 4| Sookt 4| Mantr 6

49. Atharv Ved: Kānd 4| Sookt 4| Mantr 7

50. Atharv Ved: Kānd 4| Sookt 4| Mantr 8

51. Atharv Ved: Kaand 4| Sookt 13| Mantr 1

52. Atharv Ved: Kaand 8| Sookt 1| Mantr 6

53. Atharv Ved: Kaand 8| Sookt 4| Mantr 22

54.  Atharv Ved: Kaand 14| Sookt 1| Mantr 22

55.Atharv Ved: Kaand 14| Sookt 2| Mantr 25

Fa qatulū almusharikīn ħaisu wajadttumūhum

Fa qatulū almusharikīn

ħaisu wajadttumūhum

‘Then kill the polytheists

wherever you find them’

Al Qur’an Al Kareem: 9 Attawbah|5

DSM Satyarthi

The terrorists claim this Āyat-e-Karīmah from Al Qur’an Al Kareem grants them a right to kill non Musalmīn.

Are they right in their interpretation of this Āyat-e-Karīmah?

If not, what does this Āyat-e-Karīmah really mean?

Remember, Dr. Ali Sina has written an open letter to humankind based on such Āyāt-e-Karīmāt from Al Qur’an Al Kareem, sawānaħ-e-ħayāt of Ħuzūrs, and Al Tārīkħ Al Islam.

How this Āyat-e-Karīmah was interpreted before the Counter Revolution of Yazīd malåūn?

Coming Soon

Please Wait

—————————————————————————————–

More thought provoking articles from DSM Satyarthi:

1. Why can’t we love each other?: Innallāh yuħibbul muttaqīn

2. Should we advocate abolishing religion from planet earth?

3. Does religion provide false security?

4. Polygamy: a discarded system of life

———————————————————————————

More on Hinduism from DSM Satyarthi:

1. ‘Bhoorbhuvah svah!’ ‘The Existence! The Consciousness! The Bliss!’

2.‘Devasy’ pashy’ kaavyam, n’ mamaar, n’ jeeryati.’

3. Hinduism shines

4.Ved is the eternal law book having infinite knowledge in it for human beings

5. ‘According to facts’: ‘Yaathaatathyatah’

6. ‘SET THIS WOMAN for WELL DOER’: ‘Imaam naareem Sukr’te dadhaat’

7. The Evernew Hinduism: Yaathaatathyatah: Ved 2|40|8

8. ‘How to cross death’: ‘Tamev viditvaati mr’tyumeti’: Ved2Yajurved|31|18

9. According to Hinduism: We must be polite, not coward

10.Ye yathaa maam prapadyante taanstathaiv bhajaamyaham: Lord Kr’shn

11. N’ karm lipyaté naré

—————————————————————————————————

More on Islam from DSM Satyarthi:

1. Bal huv qur’anum majeedun fe LAUHIM MAHFOOZIN

2. Innahu laquranun kareemun Fee kitabin maknoonin

3. ‘Hudallilmuttaqeen’: ‘Guidance for controllers of organs’: 2 Al Baqarah: 2

4. ‘Alaa qalbik litakoon minal-munzireen’ ‘upon your heart one of who to warn’

5. Muslimahs! Come to India. I recommend Hindu lovers for all the Muslimahs.: Khadeejah Muhammad

6. Islam according to Qur’an and Maulana Maududi rahamatullh alaihi

7. A Moment of grave thinking for the entire sophisticated Muslim Community

8. ‘SET THIS WOMAN for WELL DOER’: ‘Imaam naareem Sukr’te dadhaat’

9. ‘V’ innahu fe UMMALKITAABI ladainaa la’liyyun hakeemun’: 43/4

10. Most Present day Muslms don’t do what Huzoor(SAW) did:

11. The Muslim beauties are wooing Hindu men FASTEST

12. ‘What really matters in the sight of God’: Maulana: Maududi

13. Why did Islam face a counter revolution at Karbala?

14. Why there are differences among us?

15. No differences Please!

16. Llā yamassuhu illā almutahharūn

———————————————————————-

More Commentary on Ved from DSM Satyarthi:

1. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

2. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 1| Mantr 2

3. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 5| Mantr 3

4. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 5| Mantr 3

5. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 7| Mantr 5

6. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 7| Mantr 8

4. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 1

5. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 2

6. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 3

7. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 4

8. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 5

9. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 6

10. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 7

11. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 8

12.R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 9

13. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 58| Mantr 6

14. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 164| Mantr 20

15. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 164| Mantr 46

16. R’gved: Mandal 2| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

17 R’gved: Mandal 3| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

18. R’gved: Mandal 3| Sookt 6| Mantr 2

19. R’gved: Mandal 4| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

20. R’gved: Mandal 4| Sookt 26| Mantr 2

21. R’gved: Mandal 5| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

22. R’gved: Mandal 6| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

23. R’gved: Mandal 7| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

24. R’gved: Mandal 8| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

25. R’gved: Mandal 9| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

26. R’gved: Mandal 9| Sookt 63| Mantr 4-5

27. R’gved: Mandal 10| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

28. R’gved: Mandal 10| Sookt 85| Mantr 42

29. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 1| Mantr 1

30. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 1| Mantr 2

31. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 1| Mantr 3

32. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 1| Mantr 4

33. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 11| Mantr 1

34. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 13| Mantr 4

35. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 23| Mantr 3

36. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 31| Mantr 18

37. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 40| Mantr2

38. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 40| Mantr8

39. Saamved: Mantr 1

40. Sāmved: Mantr 115

41. Sāmved: Mantr 641: Mahānāmnyārchik| 1

42. Sāmved: Mantr 650: Mahānāmnyārchik| 10

43. Sāmved: Mantr 651: Uttarārchik

44. Atharv Ved: Kaand 1| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

45.  Atharv Ved: Kānd 3| Sookt 30| Mantr 3

46. Atharv Ved: Kānd 3| Sookt 30| Mantr 4

47. Atharv Ved: Kānd 3| Sookt 30| Mantr 6

48. Atharv Ved: Kānd 4| Sookt 4| Mantr 6

49. Atharv Ved: Kānd 4| Sookt 4| Mantr 7

50. Atharv Ved: Kānd 4| Sookt 4| Mantr 8

51. Atharv Ved: Kaand 4| Sookt 13| Mantr 1

52. Atharv Ved: Kaand 8| Sookt 1| Mantr 6

53. Atharv Ved: Kaand 8| Sookt 4| Mantr 22

54.  Atharv Ved: Kaand 14| Sookt 1| Mantr 22

55. Atharv Ved: Kaand 14| Sookt 2| Mantr 25

Wa in tusliħū wa tattaqū: And if you correct and control yourself

Wa in tusliħū wa tattaqū

And if you correct and control yourself

Fa innallah kān Ghafūranrraħīman

Then indeed Allah is ever forgiving and Merciful

Al Qur’an Al Kareem: 4 An Nisā’: 129

DSM Satyarthi

It is generally, and quite erroneously, believed that Al Qur’an Al Kareem guarantees Jannat for all the Musalmīn if they keep their Īmān whether they follow other requisites of Islam or otherwise.

This erroneous idea of salvation is a bidåt, a new distortion, in Musalmīn after Christianity.

Of all the religions only Christianity believes that a person’s salvation is not dependent on his/her own good deeds.

It depends on his/her undisputed belief and surrender to Lord Jesus Christ.

Hinduism is well known for its Karmphal Siddhānt:

Kurvannévéh karmāñi jijĪvishéchchhatagvong samāh,

Évam tvayi nānyathéto’sti na karm lipyaté naré.’

‘Only doing Karm/works here, one should wish to live hundreds of years. Only this is the way, none else; so Karm cleaveth not to man.’

Ved: 2 Yajurved: 40|2

Karmañyévādhikārasté mā phaléshu kadāchan.

Mā karmphalhéturbhūrmā té sango’stvakarmañi.’

‘Your right is only in deeds, never in results. Don’t be obsessed with the result. Neither your obsession should be in worklessness.’

Shrīmad Bhagvad Gītā: 2|47

In the beginning, there was only one religion, Hinduism.

The human beings were tired of doing work and practicing righteousness 24x7x365.

So they devised Zoroastrianism.

It was some relief to the persons of normal prudence from the never compromising Hinduism.

Yet even the prophet Zoroaster could not suggest this ridiculous idea that one can get salvation only having undisputed belief on someone.

It was only a long afterward the inventor of present Christianity could dare it.

As far as Al Qur’an Al Kareem and Islam is concerned I find the salvation/ Al Jannat is not so easy to be achieved.

Even the forgiveness and the mercy of Allah is conditional according to Al Qur’an Al Kareem:

Wa in tusliħū wa tattaqū’

And if you correct and control yourself

Fa inn Allah kān Ghafūranrraħīman

Then indeed Allah is ever forgiving and Merciful

Al Qur’an Al Kareem: 4 An Nisā’: 129

Wa in tusliħū a tattaqū

‘And if you correct and control yourself’

What does this Āyat-e-Karīmah is telling actually?

It tells if one does not correct ‘tusliħū and does not control himself/herself tattaqū he/she would never be forgiven.

Neither even the mercy of Allah would be for him/her.

—————————————————————————

More on Islam from DSM Satyarthi:

1. Bal huv qur’anum majeedun fe LAUHIM MAHFOOZIN

2. Innahu laquranun kareemun Fee kitabin maknoonin

3. ‘Hudallilmuttaqeen’: ‘Guidance for controllers of organs’: 2 Al Baqarah: 2

4. ‘Alaa qalbik litakoon minal-munzireen’ ‘upon your heart one of who to warn’

5. Muslimahs! Come to India. I recommend Hindu lovers for all the Muslimahs.: Khadeejah Muhammad

6. Islam according to Qur’an and Maulana Maududi rahamatullh alaihi

7. A Moment of grave thinking for the entire sophisticated Muslim Community

8. ‘SET THIS WOMAN for WELL DOER’: ‘Imaam naareem Sukr’te dadhaat’

9. ‘V’ innahu fe UMMALKITAABI ladainaa la’liyyun hakeemun’: 43/4

10. Most Present day Muslms don’t do what Huzoor(SAW) did:

11. The Muslim beauties are wooing Hindu men FASTEST

12. ‘What really matters in the sight of God’: Maulana: Maududi

13. Why did Islam face a counter revolution at Karbala?

14. Why there are differences among us?

15. No differences Please!

16. Llā yamassuhu illā almutahharūn

17. Fa’in kħiftum allā tådilū fa wāħidatan

18. Islam according to Ved

19. Wa in tusliħū wa tattaqū: And if you correct and control yourself

——————————————————————————————–

1. On Hinduism

2. On Islam

3. On History

4. Commentary on Ved

5. Science Fiction

6. More Creative Adult Sex in English from Durgesh

7.Durgesh in Hindi/Urdu

———————————————————————————

More on Hinduism from DSM Satyarthi:

1. ‘Bhoorbhuvah svah!’ ‘The Existence! The Consciousness! The Bliss!’

2.‘Devasy’ pashy’ kaavyam, n’ mamaar, n’ jeeryati.’

3. Hinduism shines

4.Ved is the eternal law book having infinite knowledge in it for human beings

5. ‘According to facts’: ‘Yaathaatathyatah’

6. ‘SET THIS WOMAN for WELL DOER’: ‘Imaam naareem Sukr’te dadhaat’

7. The Evernew Hinduism: Yaathaatathyatah: Ved 2|40|8

8. ‘How to cross death’: ‘Tamev viditvaati mr’tyumeti’: Ved2Yajurved|31|18

9. According to Hinduism: We must be polite, not coward

10.Ye yathaa maam prapadyante taanstathaiv bhajaamyaham: Lord Kr’shn

—————————————————————————————————

Commentary on Ved from DSM Satyarthi:

1. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

2. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 1| Mantr 2

3. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 5| Mantr 3

4. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 5| Mantr 3

5. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 7| Mantr 5

6. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 7| Mantr 8

4. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 1

5. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 2

6. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 3

7. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 4

8. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 5

9. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 6

10. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 7

11. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 8

12.R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 9

13. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 58| Mantr 6

14. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 164| Mantr 20

15. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 164| Mantr 46

16. R’gved: Mandal 2| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

17 R’gved: Mandal 3| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

18. R’gved: Mandal 3| Sookt 6| Mantr 2

19. R’gved: Mandal 4| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

20. R’gved: Mandal 5| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

21. R’gved: Mandal 6| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

22. R’gved: Mandal 7| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

23. R’gved: Mandal 8| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

24. R’gved: Mandal 9| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

25. R’gved: Mandal 9| Sookt 63| Mantr 4-5

26. R’gved: Mandal 10| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

27. R’gved: Mandal 10| Sookt 85| Mantr 42

28. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 1| Mantr 1

29. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 1| Mantr 2

30. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 1| Mantr 3

31. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 1| Mantr 4

32. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 11| Mantr 1

33. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 13| Mantr 4

34. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 23| Mantr 3

35. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 31| Mantr 18

36. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 40| Mantr8

37. Saamved: Mantr 1

38. Sāmved: Mantr 115

39. Sāmved: Mantr 641: Mahānāmnyārchik| 1

40. Sāmved: Mantr 650: Mahānāmnyārchik| 10

41. Sāmved: Mantr 651: Uttarārchik

42. Atharv Ved: Kaand 1| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

43.  Atharv Ved: Kānd 3| Sookt 30| Mantr 3

44. Atharv Ved: Kānd 3| Sookt 30| Mantr 4

45. Atharv Ved: Kānd 3| Sookt 30| Mantr 6

46. Atharv Ved: Kānd 4| Sookt 4| Mantr 6

47. Atharv Ved: Kānd 4| Sookt 4| Mantr 7

48. Atharv Ved: Kānd 4| Sookt 4| Mantr 8

49. Atharv Ved: Kaand 8| Sookt 1| Mantr 6

50. Atharv Ved: Kaand 8| Sookt 4| Mantr 22

51.  Atharv Ved: Kaand 14| Sookt 1| Mantr 22

52.Atharv Ved: Kaand 14| Sookt 2| Mantr 25