Hinduism shines 2: To anti Hindus about Lord Ram

Hinduism shines

DSM Satyarthi

Chapter 1

Chapter 2

To anti Hindus about Lord Ram

I’ve already answered the matter in ‘Hinduism strikes back-1‘.

Yet, as it’s being repeated by the hate mongers, I discuss it here again:

Alex 123 writes:
‘LORD RAMA’S MOM (& CO-MOMS) HAVE SEX WITH A DEAD HORSE (ASVAMEDHA SACRIFICE)
The Asvamedha yajna was a celebrated sacrifice in which many ancient Hindu queens & ksatriya women in various provinces had sex with a dead horse, and Lord Rama’s mom (Kausalya) & co-mom’s were no exception. Lord Rama’s mom spends a whole night having sex with a dead horse for the purpose of ‘righteousness & cleansing of sins’:

“The prescribed victims — snakes, birds, the horse, and aquatic animals — were bound at the place of immolation; each was dedicated to a specific divinity as is set forth in the ritual texts. The priests then bound them all to the posts in the manner set forth in the ritual texts. Three hundred beasts in addition to Dasaratha’s jewel of a horse were bound there to the sacrificial posts. Kausalya (Rama’s mom) walked reverently all around the horse and then with the greatest joy cut it with three knives. Her mind unwavering in her desire for righteousness, Kausalya (Rama’s mom) passed one night with the horse. The priests — the hotr, the adhvaryu, and the udgatr — saw to it that the second and the juniormost of the king’s wives, as well as his chief queen, were united with the horse. Then the officiating priest, who was extremely adept and held his senses in check, removed the fat of the horse and cooked it in the manner prescribed in the ritual texts. At the proper time and in accordance with the ritual prescriptions, the lord of men then sniffed the fragrance of the smoking fat, thereby freeing himself from sin. Then, acting in unison, the sixteen brahman officiating priests threw the limbs of the horse into the fire, in accordance with the ritual injunctions. In other sacrifices, the oblation is offered upon branches of the plaksa tree, but in the Horse Sacrifice alone the apportionment of the victim is made on a bed of reeds. The Horse Sacrifice is known as the Three-Day Rite; for both the kalpasutra and the brahmanas refer to the Horse Sacrifice as a rite lasting for three days.” — Ramayana 1:13:24-33.’

This nonsense is being repeated by every hate monger Muslim.
They copy it from somewhere and paste.
It gives them animal satisfaction that their religion is better.
Is it really religion at all?
Whether the actions of a person/persons can be religion for others?
For Muslims:YES.
For Hindus: NO:
Hinduism builds its society, not on beliefs, or sex, as Islam does.

Hinduism builds its society on WISDOM AND FACTS.
As Islam is based on Kalmae Tayyaba:’La ilah illillah, Muhammadarrasoolallah; Hinduism is based on Gayatri Mantr:
‘Bhoorbhuvah svah!
tatsaviturvarenyam, Bhargo devasy’ dheemahi,
DHIYO YO NAH PRACHODAYAT.’
‘(Vow:)The Existence. The Consciousness. The Bliss.We meditate on the Creator of all, Worthy to be chosen, the Pure, the Divine, Who guide our WISDOM.’
-Ved: 2 Yajurved: Chapter 36/3, Maitraayan’ee Samhita: 1/6/41, 8/18;34;37,41; 3/4/10; Shatpath Brahman’: 3/2/2/6
In Hinduism, this Mantr is called MoolMantr, Mahamantr, Mantrraj, etc.

The main difference between these two basic themes of these two great religions, is:
Kalmae Tayyaba mentions a person.
Gayatri Mantr does not.
It mentions Eishan Parambrham Paramatma only.
Thus Islam is basically a person oriented religion, while Hinduism is basically immune to any person whosoever.
It is based on PRINCIPLES, not on any person whosoever.

The hate monger has given the reference:

Ramayana 1:13:24-33

Let’s get them in original.

tathaa kekaya raajaanam vR^iddham parama dhaarmikam |
shvashuram raaja si.mhasya saputram tvam iha aanaya
|| 1-13-24

24.tathaa likewise; vR^iddham parama dhaarmikam= elderly one, very, virtuous one; shvashuram= father-in-law; raaja simhasya= of king, the lion’s [Dasharatha’s]; kekaya raajaanam= Kekaya’s king; sa putram tvam iha aanaya= along with his sons, you, here, invited.

Likewise, King of Kekaya, an elderly, very virtuous, and also the father-in-law of our Lion-King Dasharatha, you personally invite him along with his sons. [1-13-24]

Here, Father of Kaikeyi, is to be invited. Nothing else.
Now, 25th verse:
a~Ngeshvaram maheSvaasam romapaadam su satkR’itam |
vayasyam raaja si.mhasya saputram tam iha aanaya
|| 1-13-25

25. anga iiswaram= Anga kingdom’s, lord; maha iSvaasam= great bow, user of; raaja simhasya= king, the Lion [Dasharatha]; vayasyam= friend of; yashashvinam= illustrious one; romapaadam su satkritam= Romapada, well, honoured, sam aanaya= well, be invited.

Romapada, the lord of Anga kingdom and the user of great bow, let that illustrious one be invited well honoured, for he is the friend of our lion-king Dasharatha.’
-Aarsh Ramayan: 1 Baal Kaand:| Sarg/Chapter13|25

No such nonsense here too.

Let’s scrutinize the 26th Verse now:

tathaa kosala raajaanam bhaanuma.ntam susatkR^itam |
magadha adhipatim shuuram sarva shaastra vishaaradam
|| 1-13-26

26. tathaa kosala raajaanam= like that, Kosala’s, king; bhaanumantam= Bhanumanta; susatkR^itam= well honoured; magadha adhipatim= Magadha, king; shuuram= brave one; sarva shaastra vishaaradam= in all scriptures, profound.

Like that King of Kosala namely Bhanumanta, and the King of Magadha, a brave one and a profound one in all scriptural knowledge, let them be honoured well and be invited. [1-13-26]

No such nonsense, as claimed here again.

Let’s scrutinize the 27th Verse now:

praaptij~nam paramodaaram susatkR^itam puruSarSabham |
raaj~naH shaasanam aadaaya chodayasva nR^iparSabhaan |
praaciinaan sindhu sauviiraan sauraaSThreyaam ca paarthivaan
|| 1-13-27

27. praaptij~nam= Praaptijna, the king of Magadha; parama udaaram= kind-hearted one; susatkR^itam= well honoured; puruSarSabham= king, the best; raaj~naH shaasanam aadaaya= king’s, orders, taking; chodayasva= motivated by it; nR^iparSabhaan= kings, the best; praaciinaan= eastern regional kings; sindhu sauviiraan sauraaSThreyaam ca paarthivaan= Sindhu, Sauviira, Sauraastra, also, kings of.

And Praaptijna, the king of Magadha, the kind-hearted and best one among kings, be well honoured and invited. Further, taking the orders of King Dasharatha and motivated by those orders, the kings of Sindhu, Sauviira and Sauraastra kingdoms may also be invited. [1-13-27]

Once again, no such alleged nonsense.
We come to 28th verse and 29th now:

daakSiNaatyaan narendraam ca samastaan aanayasva ha |
santi snigdhaaH ca ye ca anye raajaanaH pR^ithivii tale,
taan aanaya yathaa kSipram sa anugaan saha baandhavaan.
etaan duutaiH mahaabhaagaiH aanayasva nR’ipa aaj~nyaa
.

28, 29. daakSiNaatyaan narendraam ca= southern kingdoms’, kings, also; samastaan aanayasva ha= all of them, be invited, verily; santi snigdhaaH cha ye cha anye= should there be, friends, other, those, also, other; raajaanaH pridhvii tale= kings, on earth’s, surface; taan aanaya yathaa kshipram= them, be invited, as early as; sa anugaan saha baandhavaan= along with, followers, along with, their relatives; etaan mahaabhaagaiH duutaiH= them, highly illustrious ones, through envoys; aanayasva nR^ipa aaj~nyaa= invite them, by king’s, orders.

All of the kings of southern kingdoms be invited, and should there be any other friends and other friendly kings on the surface of the earth, they too shall be invited as early as possible with all their followers, relatives through highly illustrious envoys, of course

with the orders of our king.” Thus Sage Vashishta said to minister Sumantr’!
-Aarsh Ramayan: 1 Baal Kaand:| Sarg/Chapter13|28-29

Once again, no such alleged nonsense.

Everyone must pay attention to it.

Now, the 30th Verse:

vasiSTha vaakyam tat shrutvaa suma.ntraH tvaritaH tadaa |
vyaadishat puruSaan tatra raaj~naam aanayane shubhaan
|| 1-13-30

30. tat vashiSTa vaakyam shrutvaa= that, Sage Vashishta’s, words, on hearing; tadaa sumantraH tvaritaH= then, Sumantra, expeditiously; raajnanam tatra aanayane= kings, there [to their kingdom,] for inviting; shubhaan puruSaan vyaadishat= devout men � envoys, men, ordered.

On hearing that word of Vashishta, Sumantra expeditiously ordered devout envoys to invite all those kings to their kingdom. [1-13-30]

What a tragedy for the hate monger!

No such nonsense anywhere!

The 31st Verse is:

svayam eva hi dharmaatmaa prayaato muni shaasanaat |
suma.ntraH tvarito bhuutvaa samaanetum mahaamatiH
|| 1-13-31

31. dharmaatmaa sumantraH= virtuous one, Sumantra; muni shaashanaat= by sage’s, orders; twaritaH bhuutva= brisk, on becoming; samaanetum mahii kshitaH= to fetch, earth’s, rulers; svayam eva prayayaataH= personally, thus, journeyed.

That virtuous Sumantra became brisk upon sage’s words and personally journeyed to fetch all the rulers on the earth. [1-13-31]

The 32nd Verse:

te ca karmaantikaaH sarve vasiSThaaya ca maharSaye |
sarvam nivedayanti sma yaj~ne yat upakalpitam
|| 1-13-32

32. te karma antikaaH sarve= those, artisans, all; yaj~ne yat upakalpitam= in ritual, works, that are accomplished; vashiSTyaa, maharSaye= to Vashishta, to the sage; sarvam nivedayanti sma= all details, have, reported.

All those artisans engaged in ritual works have reported Vashishta, the details of all those ritual works that are accomplished. [1-13-32]

Now the last Verse, 33rd Verse the moron mentioned:

tataH priito dvija shreSThaH taan sarvaan munir abraviit |
avaj~nayaa na daatavyam kasya cit liilayaa api vaa || 1-13-33
avaj~nayaa kR^itam hanyaat daataaram na atra sa.mshayaH
|

33, 34a. tataH priitaH dwija shreshtaH muniH= then, satisfied, Brahman, eminent, saint, Sage Vashishta; taan sarvaan abraviit= to, all of them, said; avaj~nayaa na daatavyam= with disrespect, not, to be endowed; kasya chit liilaya api vaa= to anyone, deceptively, also, either; avaj~nayaa kR^itam hanyaat daataaram= with disrespect, done [deeds,] will kill, donor; na atra samshayam= not, there, any doubt.

Then, that satisfied saint and eminent Brahman Vashishta, spoke this way to all of them, “nothing is to be endowed to anyone either with disrespect or deceptively, the deeds done with disrespect will kill the donor and there is no doubt about it.” [1-13-33, 34a]

All the ten verses of the reference, Ramayan: 1 Baal Kaand:13|24-33, are produced here, with original Sanskr’t text.
I reproduce all of them here, translations only now:
Likewise, King of Kekaya, an elderly, very virtuous, and also the father-in-law of our Lion-King Dasharath, you personally invite him along with his sons.
-Aarsh Ramayan: 1 Baal Kaand:| Sarg/Chapter13|24
Romapada, the lord of Anga kingdom and the user of great bow, let that illustrious one be invited well honoured, for he is the friend of our lion-king Dasharath.
-Aarsh Ramayan: 1 Baal Kaand:| Sarg/Chapter13|25
Like that King of Kosal namely Bhanumant, and the King of Magadh, a brave one and a profound one in all scriptural knowledge, let them be honoured well and be invited.’
-Aarsh Ramayan: 1 Baal Kaand:| Sarg/Chapter13|26
And Praaptigy’, the king of Magadh, the kind-hearted and best one among kings, be well honoured and invited.Further, taking the orders of King Dasharath and motivated by those orders, the kings of Sindhu, Sauviir and Sauraastr kingdoms may also be invited.’
-Aarsh Ramayan: 1 Baal Kaand:| Sarg/Chapter13|27
All of the kings of southern kingdoms be invited, and should there be any other friends and other friendly kings on the surface of the earth, they too shall be invited as early as possible with all their followers, relatives through highly illustrious envoys, of course with the orders of our king.” Thus Sage Vashishth said to minister Sumantr’!’
-Aarsh Ramayan: 1 Baal Kaand:| Sarg/Chapter13|28-29
‘On hearing that word of Vashishth, Sumantr expeditiously ordered devout envoys to invite all those kings to their kingdom.’
-Aarsh Ramayan: 1 Baal Kaand:| Sarg/Chapter13|30
‘That virtuous Sumantr became brisk upon sage’s words and personally journeyed to fetch all the rulers

on the earth.’
-Aarsh Ramayan: 1 Baal Kaand:| Sarg/Chapter13|31
‘All those artisans engaged in ritual works have reported Vashishth, the details of all those ritual works that are accomplished.’
-Aarsh Ramayan: 1 Baal Kaand:| Sarg/Chapter13|32
‘Then, that satisfied saint and eminent Brahman Vashishth, spoke this way to all of them, “nothing is to be endowed to anyone either with disrespect or deceptively, the deeds done with disrespect will kill the donor and there is no doubt about it.”
-Aarsh Ramayan: 1 Baal Kaand:| Sarg/Chapter13|33

Now,can the hate monger Alex123 tell the entire Internet Community: What is there in these ten verses that he has written:
”LORD RAMA’S MOM (& CO-MOMS) HAVE SEX WITH A DEAD HORSE (ASVAMEDHA SACRIFICE)
The Asvamedha yajna was a celebrated sacrifice in which many ancient Hindu queens & ksatriya women in various provinces had sex with a dead horse, and Lord Rama’s mom (Kausalya) & co-mom’s were no exception. Lord Rama’s mom spends a whole night having sex with a dead horse for the purpose of ‘righteousness & cleansing of sins’:

“The prescribed victims — snakes, birds, the horse, and aquatic animals — were bound at the place of immolation; each was dedicated to a specific divinity as is set forth in the ritual texts. The priests then bound them all to the posts in the manner set forth in the ritual texts. Three hundred beasts in addition to Dasaratha’s jewel of a horse were bound there to the sacrificial posts. Kausalya (Rama’s mom) walked reverently all around the horse and then with the greatest joy cut it with three knives. Her mind unwavering in her desire for righteousness, Kausalya (Rama’s mom) passed one night with the horse. The priests — the hotr, the adhvaryu, and the udgatr — saw to it that the second and the juniormost of the king’s wives, as well as his chief queen, were united with the horse. Then the officiating priest, who was extremely adept and held his senses in check, removed the fat of the horse and cooked it in the manner prescribed in the ritual texts. At the proper time and in accordance with the ritual prescriptions, the lord of men then sniffed the fragrance of the smoking fat, thereby freeing himself from sin. Then, acting in unison, the sixteen brahman officiating priests threw the limbs of the horse into the fire, in accordance with the ritual injunctions. In other sacrifices, the oblation is offered upon branches of the plaksa tree, but in the Horse Sacrifice alone the apportionment of the victim is made on a bed of reeds. The Horse Sacrifice is known as the Three-Day Rite; for both the kalpasutra and the brahmanas refer to the Horse Sacrifice as a rite lasting for three days.” — Ramayana 1:13:24-33.’

Can he prove his point?
Even his ancestors can’t.
SHAME ON THE DIRTY LIAR!

Where is Lord Ram’s Mom/Co Moms here, even mentioned?Where is any horse, living or dead, mentioned?Where is any sex mentioned?Alex123 is a complete hate monger, dirty liar.Shame!Shame!!

‘Chahat uđāvani phūnki pahāđū.’

They want to blow away the mountain only by blowing air from their mouth to it.

Ridiculous!

They don’t and can’t understand ever why Hinduism is immortal.

Ab initio,right from the beginning of the creations, Hinduism claims that it exists:

‘Naasadaaseeno sadaseettadaaneemnaaseedrajo
no vyomaa paro yat,

kimaavareevah kuh kasy’ sharmannambhah kimaaseedgahanam gabheeram?
N’ Mr’tyuraaseedamr’tam n’ tarhi
n’ raatryaa ahn aaseetpraketah,
aaneedavaatam svadhayaa tadekam
tasmaaddhaany’nn’ parah kinchanaas.’

– Ved: 1R|10| 129 Naasadeey’ Sookt| 1-2.

Dr. Isaac Asimov has translated these two

mantrs:

‘Then was not nonexistent nor existent,
there was no realm of air, no sky beyond it.
What covered in, and where?
And what gave shelter? Was water there,
Unfathomed depth of water?
Death was not then,
nor was there aught immortal:
no sign was there, the day’s and night’s divider.
That One Thing, breathless,
breathed by its own nature:
apart from it was nothing whatsoever’.
– Creations: Isaac Asimov: Harrap London 1984: p.101.

Moreover, he has written an introductory note also:

‘Those people whose education and experience have been sharply limited to their own communities are apt to end with a totally self-contained view of the Universe. Their language is the only language. Why should anyone call a boy a knabe or a garcon, when a boy is manifestly a boy?
Again, people who believe that the Bible is the inspired word of God often believe that the King James Bible, specifically, that is so inspired, and turn away in horror from any attempt to correct or modernize what is after all merely a translation. Or as one aged parishioner said, waving his Bible,‘If the King James was good enough for the prophets and apostles, it is good enough for me.’
Yet there are sophisticated attempts at penetrating the mysteries of creation that are neither scientific nor Judo Christian and here is one of them: a Hindu Attempt.
There are points in it that resemble Genesis1 (chaos and darkness first, and then light), and points that do not (the Universe first and gods next, rather than reverse).
– Creations: Isaac Asimov: Harrap London 1984: p.101.

It faced successfully all the aggressions and attacks on it, whether Raxasism of Ravan that had a slogan of ‘Wayam Raxaamah’ ‘We Protect’; Persianism, Islam, Christianity, Judaism, Communism, atheism and what not .

They converted entire nations elsewhere.
Mind you, not only one nation, NATIONS.
Yet, the same philosophies, the same systems of life, the same religions; marched to India, very aggressively, YET FAILED MISERABLY.

Why is it so?

Even, now the internationally famous, and respected poet, Sir Muhammad Iqbal, when he was an Indian, wrote with a great pride:

‘Kuchh baat hai ki hasti mitti nahin hamari,
dushman raha hai sadiyon, daure jahan hamara.’

What is that ‘baat’?

The humanity of Hinduism, of course!

—————————————————————————————

More on Hinduism from DSM Satyarthi:

1. ‘Bhoorbhuvah svah!’ ‘The Existence! The Consciousness! The Bliss!’

2.‘Devasy’ pashy’ kaavyam, n’ mamaar, n’ jeeryati.’

3. Hinduism shines

4.Ved is the eternal law book having infinite knowledge in it for human beings

5. ‘According to facts’: ‘Yaathaatathyatah’

6. ‘SET THIS WOMAN for WELL DOER’: ‘Imaam naareem Sukr’te dadhaat’

7. The Evernew Hinduism: Yaathaatathyatah: Ved 2|40|8

8. ‘How to cross death’: ‘Tamev viditvaati mr’tyumeti’: Ved2Yajurved|31|18

9. According to Hinduism: We must be polite, not coward

10.Ye yathaa maam prapadyante taanstathaiv bhajaamyaham: Lord Kr’shn

11. ‘Maachchhitthaa asmaallokaat’ ‘Be not severed from this world’: Ved

12. The mental slavery of the English-educated Indians

——————————————————————————————————————–-

More on Islam from DSM Sayarthi:

1. Bal huv qur’anum majeedun fe LAUHIM MAHFOOZIN

2. Innahu laquranun kareemun Fee kitabin maknoonin

3. ‘Hudallilmuttaqeen’: ‘Guidance for controllers of organs’: 2 Al Baqarah: 2

4. ‘Alaa qalbik litakoon minal-munzireen’ ‘upon your heart one of who to warn’

5. Muslimahs! Come to India. I recommend Hindu lovers for all the Muslimahs.: Khadeejah Muhammad

6. Islam according to Qur’an and Maulana Maududi rahamatullh alaihi

7. A Moment of grave thinking for the entire sophisticated Muslim Community

8. ‘SET THIS WOMAN for WELL DOER’: ‘Imaam naareem Sukr’te dadhaat’

9. ‘V’ innahu fe UMMALKITAABI ladainaa la’liyyun hakeemun’: 43/4

10. Most Present day Muslms don’t do what Huzoor(SAW) did:

11. The Muslim beauties are wooing Hindu men FASTEST

12. ‘What really matters in the sight of God’: Maulana: Maududi

13. Why did Islam face a counter revolution at Karbala?

14. Why there are differences among us?

15. No differences Please!

16. Communal Muslims discuss my Muslim wife, me and my Muslim women: Durgesh

———————————————————————

Commentary on Ved from DSM Satyarthi:

1. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

2. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 1| Mantr 2

3. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 5| Mantr 3

4. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 5| Mantr 3

5. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 7| Mantr 5

6. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 7| Mantr 8

4. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 1

5. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 2

6. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 3

7. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 4

8. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 5

9. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 6

10. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 7

11. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 8

12.R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 9

13. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 58| Mantr 6

14. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 164| Mantr 20

15. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 164| Mantr 46

16. R’gved: Mandal 2| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

17 R’gved: Mandal 3| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

18. R’gved: Mandal 3| Sookt 6| Mantr 2

19. R’gved: Mandal 4| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

20. R’gved: Mandal 5| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

21. R’gved: Mandal 6| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

22. R’gved: Mandal 7| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

23. R’gved: Mandal 8| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

24. R’gved: Mandal 9| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

25. R’gved: Mandal 9| Sookt 63| Mantr 4-5

26. R’gved: Mandal 10| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

27. R’gved: Mandal 10| Sookt 85| Mantr 42

28. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 1| Mantr 1

29. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 1| Mantr 2

30. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 1| Mantr 3

31. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 1| Mantr 4

32. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 11| Mantr 1

33. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 13| Mantr 4

34. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 23| Mantr 3

35. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 40| Mantr8

36. Saamved: Mantr 1

37. Sāmved: Mantr 115

38. Sāmved: Mantr 641: Mahānāmnyārchik| 1

39. Sāmved: Mantr 650: Mahānāmnyārchik| 10

40. Sāmved: Mantr 651: Uttarārchik

41. Atharv Ved: Kaand 1| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

42.  Atharv Ved: Kānd 3| Sookt 30| Mantr 3

43. Atharv Ved: Kānd 3| Sookt 30| Mantr 4

44. Atharv Ved: Kānd 3| Sookt 30| Mantr 6

45. Atharv Ved: Kānd 4| Sookt 4| Mantr 6

46. Atharv Ved: Kānd 4| Sookt 4| Mantr 7

47. Atharv Ved: Kānd 4| Sookt 4| Mantr 8

48. Atharv Ved: Kaand 8| Sookt 1| Mantr 6

49. Atharv Ved: Kaand 14| Sookt 1| Mantr 22

50. Atharv Ved: Kaand 14| Sookt 2| Mantr 25

Yūsuf or Kr’shñ?-1

Yūsuf or Kr’shñ?

Who is our role model?

What do you want to be?

What do you want your children to be?

DSM Satyarthi

Chapter 1

The War Policy of the Hindus

Maulānah Imran looked at Ållāmah Ibrāhīm gravely,

“Ållāmah muħtaram, the problem is grave.”

“I know, Maulānah!”

“This new system of life is revolting our youth against Islam itself.”

“We can’t face it within the limits Islam has prescribed.” Akram said, almost complaining, “If we live within the limits, our daughters and sisters are revolting, leaving Islami Mumālik, in a large number, under this or that pretext. Once out of  Islami Mumālik, they are beyond our legal approach. They marry non Muslims, or just live in with them.”

“This new system of life is harming Islam more than even Durgesh has harmed.” Muħammad Ħasan could not control him.

Maulānah Imran smiled,

“Imām Sāħab, I don’t think Durgesh is responsible for this situation.”

Muħammad Ħasan looked at Maulānah Imran gravely.

“I can understand your dependence on Durgesh, Maulānah!”

“Can you suggest me any alternate from Musalmeen?”

“Nonsense, Maulānah Imran,” Ållāmah Ibrāhīm almost scolded, “do you believe Islam has failed? Allah, nauzbillah, has too?”

“Certainly not, Ållāmah muħtaram!”

“Then, will you please explain to me what do you mean?” Instead Maulānah Imran, Akram said impatiently, “It is not an ilmī baħas we are facing, gentlemen. My wife wants sex in broad daylight.”

“Zubédah?”

“No, not Zubédah, Nasreen.”

“Allah kā shukr hai. That’s what I thought.”

“But Zubédah herself is not måsūm.”

“What do you mean?”

“She is the mastermind behind it all.” Akram informed them curtly.

It was Masjid-e Nabvīs.

Salāt-e-Isha’a was just finished.

The Musalmeen were just chatting after the Salāt.

Akram was not feeling comfortable.

He did not want to be another Imām Muħammad Ħasan.

It was Akram’s well thought conclusion that Imām Muħammad Ħasan has lost to Durgesh miserably.

After all, what more a man can lose?

Durgesh has successfully managed to maintain live in relationships with Imām Muħammad Ħasan’s every houselady.

Live in relationships.

Durgesh has not even bothered to marry them.

Imām Muħammad Ħasan thundered at Akram,

“So you want Durgesh to marry our houseladies?”

“Imām Sāħab!”

“Akram Sāħab, I didn’t know you are so against us Musalmeen.”

“What do you mean?”

“They are maintaining only their live in relationships with Durgesh.”

“So?”

“Why do you want Durgesh to marry them?”

“Your daughters from them are also doing the same with Durgesh one by one. Naåīmah is the latest.”

“I did not know Nafīsah Salmān would fail as a mother, so miserably.”

“Imām Sāħab! Naåīmah still respects and love you as her Abbū, very much.” “I’m proud of her, Akram Sāħab!”

“Yet she surrendered to Durgesh in the moonlight, providing him a historical shab-e-urosi and honeymoon for complete one month with her.”

Naåīmah is still faithful to me, as well as to Islam .”

“Alas, none else of your entire extremely beautiful houseladies proved to be so.” Imām Muħammad Ħasan observed Akram Salmān Sheikħ with keen interest,

“Akram, Nafīsah is your own real sister.”

“Yes.” Akram Salmān Sheikħ said somewhat curtly, “yet we married her to you.”

Imām Muħammad Ħasan was hit under the belt.

Yet he managed not to appear his hurt reactions to come on his bearded face.

In the long run, ultimately, he had learned somewhat how to do it.

His face was fully covered with beard.

And it helped.

Inadvertently, his brain remembered his wife, Nafīsah Salmān’s hateful remark,

“Now I know, Muħammad Ħasan, why do you Musalmeen keep your dirty faces so full of beards.”

“We do it to follow the Sunnat-e-Nabvīs. You understood it once, yourself.”

“Yes!” Nafīsah Salmān winked at him, “yet, I did not know then, it’s one more benefit to you Musalmeen.”

“Oh!”

“It helps you Musalmeen to hide your immense shame, for your inhumane deeds, behind it, although I doubt you Musalmeen feel any of such shame. It needs some inherent humanity to feel that.”

Nafīsah!”

“Huzoors knew you Musalmeen’d need beard very much to hide your dirty faces behind these heavy dirty beards.”

“Then why burqah? To hide you Musalmān Beauties’ entire shameful bodies always surrendered to non Musalmeen shamelessly nude?”

“Thank you. I knew you have such dirty views of us Musalmān Beauties.” Nafīsah Salmān cooed not impressed even a bit.

Naåīmah hates you, your own daughter.”

“Yes, I know.” Nafīsah Salmān smiled, “but I know too who is poisoning her mind against me.”

“Oh!”

Muħammad Ħasan, do you know why not even a single houselady of yours has accompanied you in your dirty fight against Durgesh?”

“Yes. Because you all have ravenous Musalmān Cunts that love to swallow Durgesh’s dirty Uncut Hindu Penis.”

“Dil ké bahlāné ko ‘Ghālib’, yé kħayāl achchhā hai.” Nafīsah Salmān smiled, “You couldn’t stop anyone of us, because you never tried to learn the real reason behind it.”

“That I’m impotent?” Imām Muħammad Ħasan smiled ironically, “Then what about other Musalmeen? Why their ardent Musalmān wives, their ardent Musalmān sisters, their ardent Musalmān daughters, their ardent Musalmān Ammīs, their ardent Musalmān Bahoo Bégums etc. etc. deserted them in favor of your own Durgesh and/or other Hindu Sex Maniacs?”

“They all are refusing to understand that we Musalmān Beauties also have our bodies and their physical needs consequently.”

“Oh, and only Uncut Hindu Penis understands it and quenches it?”

“I’m sorry to admit it, but it’s true nevertheless.”

“There are two ideologies, Nafīsah Salmān,” Imām Muħammad Ħasan said gravely, “one is represented by our Ħazrat Yūsuf ålaihissalām, and the second is represented by Lord Kr’shñ of Hindus.”

Nafīsah Salmān smiled,

“And you believe Ħazrat Yūsuf ålaihissalām is right?”

“Every true and ardent Musalmān must believe it.” Imām Muħammad Ħasan said observing his wife, Nafīsah Salmān, contemptuously.

Nafīsah Salmān observed Imām Muħammad Ħasan more scornfully,

“Why is it, Ħasan, that your Eimān is always aggressive when it has to do something against us Muslimahs and non Muslims?”

“Nonsense!”

Why do you always put us Muslimahs with non-Muslims, Ħasan?”

“You are crazy.”

“Why are you Musalmeen not truthful with even your own womankind?”

Durgesh has poisoned your mind against us Musalmeen very much.” Imām Muħammad Ħasan said gravely, “that’s how the Hindus work.”

“What do you mean?”

Hindus themselves have accepted it always in their own history, written by them ownselves that the Hindus were never men of the battle fields. The Hindus were, and still are, always, the men of the bed, the men of our women.”

“And you think everyone should hate Hindus for it. Don’t you?” Nafīsah Salmān laughed scornfully at her husband.

“Why not? The cowards! Always seeking shelter into our women’s skirts. Hindus never fought us Musalmeen on the battlefields. They always fought us fucking our womankind. The greatest weapon the Hindus have against us Musalmeen is their Uncut Hindu Penis. Can any Hindu deny it ever truthfully?”

Nafīsah Salmān smiled,

“Why should they?”

“Why not?”

“You are accepting the fact that you Musalmeen were always, and still are, blood hounds.”

“What?”

“And instead of being ashamed of it, you are shamelessly proud of it.”Nafīsah Salmān said curtly, “Hindus never hide the fact that instead of battle fields, they prefer sex more and more.”

Imām Muħammad Ħasan laughed ironically,

“And Hindus are proud of it?”

“Why shouldn’t they be?”

“Why should they be? Only the cowards can appreciate this policy.”

“Only inhumane can appreciate what you Musalmeen did in the history. It is full of blood and destruction. The entire humankind hates the blood soaked history of Musalmeen.

“And the entire humankind appreciates the sex oriented everdirty history of Hindus? The Hindus fucked our Musalmān houseladies in our own houses, on our own beds, when we were fighting with their fighters in the battlefields.”

“Well, it was war, Ħasan.”

“Oh, what a way to fight the wars. Send some fighters to fight with the Musalmeen in the battlefields, and send the second group of dirty sexy Hindus to the households of the Musalmeen to fuck their houseladies. Shame on Hindus.”

“I don’t think so.”

“Because you are sex obsessed for Uncut Hindu Penis.”

“It’s better to be sex obsessed for Uncut Hindu Penis than being blood hounds and the devils of destructions.”

“Shame on you.”

“Shame on me? No. Never. Shame on you, Ħasan. Sex is never destructive if used with good intentions by noble doers. War is never constructive. It’s always allowed as a last resort, by humankind, if there isn’t another way to the survival of humanity.”

Nafīsah Salmān kissed me on my lips,

“He is unable to understand our viewpoint, Durgesh!”

“I know, darling!”

“Can’t we do anything for Musalmeen, really?” Naåīmah Muħammad Ħasan asked me.

“You can also try to educate your father, Naåīmah.” I said gravely, “We Hindus always prefer sex on wars. That’s why we used our Divine Weapons, our divyāstrs, always only for our self-protection. We never attacked any country, any nation, with them.”

“But you Hindus always attacked other countries and other nations with your Uncut Hindu Penis. Didn’t you?” Naåīmah Muħammad Ħasan smiled cunningly, appreciatively.

“Well, darling,” I said gravely, “We never hide our policy in the matter. We are never hypocrites in the matter. We are not known for our Divine Weapons, our divyāstrs only. We have developed Kāmsootr,  Anangrang, Rati Rahasy’, Naagar Sarvasvam, Rati Manjaree, and even Tantrs, an Upved of Atharv Ved, too. Lord Vishñu went to the extent  to make love to his sisters in law/Salhajs Vr’nda and Tulsi, even deceiving them. Because, his brothers in law/Sālé Jālandhar and Shankhchoođ were evil doers. There is a complete Chapter ‘Pādārik Prakarañ-’ , Part 5, ‘About the wives of others’;  in Kaam Sootr. The Bachhalyas/Vatss followed this principle to the extent that they were termed to be Dev Gandharvs even. ‘Y’ gaam dhaaryati s’ gandharvah’.”

“Allah—Allah, I know, Durgesh.” Naåīmah Muħammad Ħasan interrupted me.

“Then what more you want to know?”

“I don’t want to know. I want to say something.”

“You are always welcome, darling, after that moonlight and after our honeymoon for one month, after all.”

“Musalmeen would never accept sex as a constructive diplomacy and a permanent policy of war.”

“And Hindus would never leave it. Why? I’ve already told you.”

Durgesh!”

“It’s not practical even.” I said, “War is destructive. It doesn’t contain any participation of women as women. No society can be built without an active participation of womankind. The policy ‘Imām nārīm sukr’té dadhāt has full participation of womankind in building a progressive human society. We Hindus have already done it by building an immortal society.”

Chapter 2

—————————————————————————————————————

 More from DSM Satyarthi:

1.  Commentary on Ved

2. More On Hinduism

3. On Islam

4. On History

5. Science Fiction

6.  Creative Adult Sex in English from Durgesh

7. Durgesh in Hindi/Urdu

Why does Ved support Polygamy?

Why does Ved support Polygamy?

DSM Satyarthi

Eishān Param Brahm Paramātmā/Ved orders:

Vr’shā yūthév vansagah

kr’shŧīriyartyojasā. Eīshāno apratishkutah.’

Ved: 1 R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 7| Mantr 8

Hassan says:
Qur’an doesn’t support polygomy like we see in Vedas and life of many Hindu deities.

Islam strictly says that ‘marry one if you can not do justice’ between your wives and at the end it says you can never show equal justice to your wives.

Islam allowed polygomy only with conditions.
It is a solution to the current world problems.’

Isn’t it Ridiculous?
The persons who are creating eventhe danger of the end of humankind itself, by exercising continuous TERRORISM EVERWHERE, are suggesting solution to the problems too.
Anyway, he rejects the claim that terrorists are Muslims.
So, his views must be taken seriously.

‘Men die more than women in the world….by wars..alcohol…smoking..and male infants die more than female infants..all these things result in women outnumber men in the world.

There are two options left for unmarried women if the scenario is saturated for finding a man.
Either marry a man who already has a wife or become a public object for sex as sex is an essential biological need for every human being after maturity.
So only Islam has a practical solution for this.
But western people insult Muslims for this but a survey says a western man have sexual relation with 8 women before he or she finally settled down with one but after marriage also they keep several mistresses secretly….
Islam doesn’t encourage such practices but ask Muslims to marry by their choice and if it is not enough, marry more..but there should be a proper reason for that.
But unfortunately many people misuse it.

He is seeing the problem only with sex angle.
And if ONLY sex is important in human life, his stand is quite correct.
It is also correct that:

‘If you fear that you might not treat the orphans justly, then marry the women that seem good to you: two, or three, or four.*4 If you fear that you will not be able to treat them justly, then marry (only) one,*5 or marry from among those whom your right hands possess.*6 This will make it more likely that you will avoid injustice.’

Al Qur’n Al Kareem: 4 Sooratunnisa: 3

Maulana Saiyad Abul Aala Maududi, rahamatullah alaihi, writes:
‘*4. Commentators have explained this in the following ways:
(i) There is the view of ‘A’ishah who says that men tended to marry orphan girls who were under their guardianship out of consideration for either their property, beauty or because they thought they would be able to treat them according to their whims, as they had no one to protect them. After marriage such men sometimes committed excesses against these girls. It is in this context that the Muslims are told that if they fear they will not be able to do justice to the orphan girls, then they should marry other girls whom they like.(This interpretation seems to be supported by verse 127 of this surah.)
(ii) The second view is that of Ibn ‘Abbas and his disciple ‘Ikrimah who expressed the opinion that in the Jahiliyah period there was no limit on the number of wives a man could take. The result was that a man sometimes married as many as ten women and, when expenses increased because of a large family, he encroached on the rights either of his orphan nephews or other relatives. It was in this context that God fixed the limit of four wives and instructed the Muslims that they may marry up to four wives providing they possessed the capacity to treat them equitably.
(iii) Sa’id b. Jubayr, Qatadah and some other commentators say that while the Arabs of the Jahiliyah period did not approve of subjecting orphans to wrong, they had no concept of justice and equity with regard to women. They married as many women as they wanted and then subjected them to injustice and oppression. It is in this context that people are told that if they fear perpetrating wrongs on orphans they ought to be equally worried about perpetrating them on women. In the first place they should never marry more than four, and of those four, they should marry only as many as they can treat fairly.
Each of the three interpretations is plausible and all three may possibly be correct. Moreover, the verse could also mean that if a person does not find himself able to treat orphans in a fair manner, then he might as well marry the women who are looking after those orphans.

*5. Muslim jurists are agreed that according to this verse the maximum number Of wives has been fixed at four. This conclusion is also supported by traditions. It is reported that when Ghaylan, the chief of Ta’if, embraced Islam he had nine wives. The Prophet (peace be on him) ordered him to keep only four wives and divorce the rest. Another person, Nawfal b. Mu’awiyah, had five wives. The Prophet (peace be on him) ordered him to divorce one of them.(For the relevant traditions see the comments of Ibn Kathir and Qurtubi on this verse – Ed.)
This verse stipulates that marrying more wives than one is permissible on the condition that one treats his wives equitably. A person who avails himself of this permission granted by God to have a plurality of wives, and disregards the condition laid down by God to treat them equitably has not acted in good faith with God. In case there are complaints from wives that they are not being treated equitably, the Islamic state has the right to intervene and redress such grievances.
Some people who have been overwhelmed and overawed by the Christianized outlook of Westerners have tried to prove that the real aim of the Qur’an was to put an end to polygamy (which, in their opinion, is intrinsically evil). Since it was widely practised at that time, however, Islam confined itself to placing restrictions on it. Such arguments only show the mental slavery to which these people have succumbed. That polygamy is an evil per se is an unacceptable proposition, for under certain conditions it becomes a moral and social necessity. If polygamy is totally prohibited men who cannot remain satisfied with only one wife will look outside the bounds of matrimonial life and create sexual anarchy and corruption. This is likely to cause much greater harm than polygamy to the moral and social order. For this reason the Qur’an has allowed those who feel the need for it to resort to polygamy. Those who consider it an evil in itself may certainly denounce it in disregard of the Qur’an and may even argue for its abolition. But they have no right to attribute such a view to the Qur’an, for it has expressed its permission of polygamy in quite categorical terms. Indeed, there is not the slightest hint in the Qur’an that could justify the conclusion that it advocates abolition of polygamy.(For further elaboration see my book, Sunnat k A’iniHaythiyat, Lahore, 3rd edition, 1975, pp. 307-16.)

*6. This expression denotes ‘slave-girls’, i.e. female captives of war who are distributed by the state among individuals. The purpose of this verse is to tell men that if their financial circumstances do not permit them to support a free woman as their wife then they may marry a slave-girl (see verse 25 below); if they consider it necessary to have more than one wife and it would be difficult for them to treat their free wives equitably they may resort to slave-girls, for here the burden of obligations is lighter by comparison.(For further injunctions regarding slave-girls seen. 44 below.)’

–Towards understanding the Qur’an:
4Sooratunnisa: 3

Ved presents far more wider view.
It says that men and women are not created for sex.
They are created for
‘Kr’nvanto vishvmaaryam”Make all better’

Ved: 1 R’g Ved: 9/63/5

‘Dharmsantaanam ‘To spread Dharm properly.’
-Lord Ram:Aarsh Ramayan: 4 Kishkindhakand: Sarg 18/9

‘Dharmsansthaapnaarthaay’
‘To establish Dharm’
-Lord Kr’shn: Shrimad Bhagvad Geeta: 4/8

Finding no proper answer to it, Hassan Dubai UAE tried desperately to change the subject of discussion:

‘The biggest terrorists in the world at present are Hindus…when you make an appraisal about Gujarat and Orisaa riots in which Hindu zealots burnt human beings and raped even small children.
The base for their justification for the crimes agianst minorities in India is from Geetha itself in which Baghwan Krishna persuade Arjuna to fight his cousins to have heaven if he died of kingdom if he won the battle.So Hindu extreimists/terrorists instigate these poor Hindus that theyw ill get heaven or kingdom if they fight agianst evil which in their term are Christians and Muslims.

Now hold on your holes and save Hinduism from the Hindutva criminals…’

I did not allow the hate monger to deviate from the original subject:

It is required to build a society, NOT ON SEX, but on DHARM.
It is the basic difference of two systems of
life, Hinduism and Islam.

This basic difference can be observed in the practical life of Hindus and Muslims, in every aspect of life.
One of my close friends, Sidrah, is by birth a Muslimah.
Yet she has married a Hindu.
When asked why, she answered:
‘In what way have I disgraced Islam? And in what way have you honored Islam? You, yourself, admit you are a “weak Muslim,” yet you want to place yourself on the judge’s seat and play the role of judge and executioner. I suggest you try putting your own house in order first, before pointing fingers at others.

Tell me, in what way are you better than somebody like, let’s say, Durgesh Jabalpur’s wife? The way I see it, if we take into account what he has said, she’s a much better practicing Muslim than you are. The only “flaw” in her, it would seem, is that she has married a Hindu man. So, you mean to say that because of that, she is not a Muslim, and just because you have not gone through an interfaith marriage, even though you’re not steadfast in your religious practices, even though you’re a weak Muslim in your own words, you’re better off than her in every possible way? It’s ridiculous to think of it.

It’s certainly wrong to call a person that is steadfast in prayer a kaafir, and I fail to understand how you can be certain that her namaz and ibaadat are not being accepted, while yours is. What makes you think you’re better off in Allah SWT’s eyes than her? But of course, you haven’t married a kaafir, and that does make you superior to others like her, doesn’t it? That too, even if you’re far behind her in regular prayer.

If you’re really so bothered about instances like this, perhaps you should start asking yourself the question as to why it’s happening, find out the cause of it, and try to eradicate that cause. I’m sure, if you searched earnestly, you’d realize why Muslim women have started opting for non-Muslim partners. Somewhere, there’s something lacking for sure, but typical of Muslim male chauvinism, rather than accept your own shortcomings, you’re obviously going to pin the blame on the girl.

All I ask for is a change in the attitudes and mindset of the Muslim males. Today, to cite just one example, a Muslim girl can rarely pass through a Muslim locality without having to undergo countless lewd gazes, at times teasing, or similar uncalled-for actions from young Muslim males. Incidentally, these men are supposed to be protectors of the girl’s honor, in accordance with Islamic texts, but more than often, these very men are at the forefront in doing and thinking otherwise. I’ve lived in Muslim localities much of my life, and I have to admit that I really feel ashamed and insecure to be walking down the streets, when I should have had a sense of total security instead in the first place. You don’t find this in other localities. Chasing girls seems to be the top priority of Muslim males nowadays. Wouldn’t it be better off if, instead, they were to change their attitudes, open up, have a decent education, put it to good use, and try to live decent, progressive lives, rather than hang around in the streets in groups doing nothing worthy?

Finally, I don’t need you to read me what I have the right to do and what I haven’t. I’m proud to be Muslim, and I always will be proud to be Muslim. It’s a feeling that comes from deep inside and, by the Grace of Allah SWT, nothing’s ever going to change that feeling.
http://www.topix.com/forum/world/pakistan/T8I…

I said further,

We are not talking about terrorism now, we are talking about POLYGAMY.
Please, don’t try to change the subject matter of discussion.
Moreover, we are not talking of PRACTICES.
We are talking of PRINCIPLES.
Practices are not religion.
They change person to person and from time to time too.
Principles are religion.
Ved and Qur’an, both, do not change EVER.
‘Adabdhaani varunasy’ vrataani’
‘The laws of the Chosen One are inviolable.’
-Ved: 1 R’g Ved: 1/24/10

‘Devasy’ pashy’ Kaavyam n’ mamaar, n’ jeeryati’
‘See the wisdom of God: neither died nor grew old.’
-Ved: 4 Atharv Ved: 10/8/32

‘Laa tabdeel likalmaatillaahi’.
‘The words of Allah shall not change.’
Al Qur’an Al Majeed: 10 Yunus| 64.

‘Va lan tajid lisunnatillaahi tabdeelan.’
‘Never shall you find any change in the Way of Allah.’
Al Qur’an Al Majeed: 48 Al Fataħ | 23.

Sidrah says:

‘All I ask for is a change in the attitudes and mindset of the Muslim males. Today, to cite just one example, a Muslim girl can rarely pass through a Muslim locality without having to undergo countless lewd gazes, at times teasing, or similar uncalled-for actions from young Muslim males. Incidentally, these men are supposed to be protectors of the girl’s honor, in accordance with Islamic texts, but more than often, these very men are at the forefront in doing and thinking otherwise. I’ve lived in Muslim localities much of my life, and I have to admit that I really feel ashamed and insecure to be walking down the streets, when I should have had a sense of total security instead in the first place. You don’t find this in other localities. Chasing girls seems to be the top priority of Muslim males nowadays. Wouldn’t it be better off if, instead, they were to change their attitudes, open up, have a decent education, put it to good use, and try to live decent, progressive lives, rather than hang around in the streets in groups doing nothing worthy?’
http://www.topix.com/forum/world/pakistan/T8I…

These are the facts, relevant to our discussion, and PROVE my stand clearly.
Hinduism has built its society on DHARM, and not on sex.
Hindus are sophisticated therefore in comparison with Muslims, and gradually becoming the first choice of entire womankind, Muslimahs included.
Islam, as Hassan himself admits, has built its society on sex, as its central point.
The consequence is what already described above, properly highlighted:
‘All I ask for is a change in the attitudes and mindset of the Muslim males. Today, to cite just one example, a Muslim girl can rarely pass through a Muslim locality without having to undergo countless lewd gazes, at times teasing, or similar uncalled-for actions from young Muslim males. Incidentally, these men are supposed to be protectors of the girl’s honor, in accordance with Islamic texts, but more than often, these very men are at the forefront in doing and thinking otherwise. I’ve lived in Muslim localities much of my life, and I have to admit that I really feel ashamed and insecure to be walking down the streets, when I should have had a sense of total security instead in the first place. You don’t find this in other localities. Chasing girls seems to be the top priority of Muslim males nowadays. Wouldn’t it be better off if, instead, they were to change their attitudes, open up, have a decent education, put it to good use, and try to live decent, progressive lives, rather than hang around in the streets in groups doing nothing worthy?’
http://www.topix.com/forum/world/pakistan/T8I…

‘Hassan, how many wives did Mohammed have?’

He can’t answer.
But, you are right.
Keep asking.
He is a better person in their lot.
But his stand is not correct.
He has disturbed me quite.
I think, I have to complete the rest of the matter, in my next sitting.
Enjoy friend.

Hassan says:
‘Men die more than women in the world….by wars..alcohol…smoking..and male infants die more than female infants..all these things result in women outnumber men in the world.’

Quite right.
Wars, alcohol,smoking, male infants die more than female infants; all these four reasons are already almost cured in Hindu way/system of life.
We can’t negate even the farthest possibility of all these four reasons, of course; but in general, all of these are quite taken care of in
Hindu way/system of life.
That’s why it is the oldest way/system of life, the humankind has.
Wars are not honored ever in Hindu way/system of life.
So, once married to a Hindu, no woman has to suffer from fear of widohood due to this reason.

Islam can’t say it.
It’s history is full of wars and wars only.

It is not that Hinduism does not preach it.
Ved itself orders:
‘Ete asr’gramaashavo’ti hvaraansi babhravah,
soma r’tasy’ dhaarayaa.
indram vardhanto apturah KR’NVANTO VISHVAMAARYAM,
apaghnanto araavnah’

‘These Swift flowing tawny colored Som, with a stream of eternal truth, let loose/proceed, augmenting Indr, urging the utmost beautiful young girls and ladies, MAKING ALL BETTER, destroying the withholders.’
Ved 1R| 9 | 63 | 4-5.

Ved also orders, if there come withholders in the process of ‘KR’NVANTO VISHVAMAARYAM”MAKING ALL BETTER’, in the way, destroy them:
‘apaghnanto araavnah’
‘destroying the withholders’,
but Hindus were never so war obsessed, as Muslims are found in the entire history of humankind.

Hinduism right ab initio, hates wars.
Even the very fourth Mantr of Ved clarifies in the subject:

‘Agne! yam yagyamadhvaram vishvatah paribhoorasi,
s’ iddeveshu gachchhati.’
‘O one who leads to light! thou art from all sides protector of the violence-less best work, ONLY THAT goes in divine ones.’
-Ved: 1 R’g Ved: 1/1/4

‘VIOLENCE LESS BEST WORK’ YAGYAMDHVARAM’ means: a work is NOT BEST if there’s violence in it.
‘Yagyo vai shreshthtamam karm.’
‘Yagy’ is the BEST WORK.’
-Shatpath Brahman: 1/7/1/5

‘Yagyo hi shreshthtamam karm.’
‘ONLY BEST WORK is yagy’.
-Taittireey’ Brahmanam: 3/2/1/4

First of all, all of the worlds religions except Christianity permit or allow multiple wives.
Many people are illiterate and thus do not read their scriptures properly. In the case of men of the bible, did keep extra wives but against the law of leviticus. Keep in mind that Leviticus provides solutions to problems with men with mutiple wives. Notice it always says ” IF” a man choose another women or “If” a man has sex with more than one wife. The word “IF” implies it is the choice of man to go against God’s wishes.
Allah of course allows a man to have more than one wife but warns that he will never be successful in keeping them all equal. Thus what a contradiction that is to the law!!!’

I said:

‘I think, the best person to answer it, is Hassan.
Thanks for response.’

Hassan answered Ajit:

11.’ Eleven.

Then he went on to show how uncultured he is:

‘You are ofcourse a long long *8hole..i dont have to hide anything about him when you can get any informations of his life on tip of your fingers….what kind of idiot you could be to say ‘keep asking’ as you dont know about what i have to say?’

I replied naturally:

The idiot is frustrated and angry consequently.
Lacking manners heavily due to his faulty upbringing.

I’ve already said: You’ve your own prejudices you think true.
The main difference between you and me is, you lack manners heavily, I don’t at all.
However, you are not responsible for it.
It’s our CULTURAL UPBRINGING.
You are taught not to read anything except Islam.
I’m taught:
Vidyaam chaavidyaanch yastadvedobhayagvong sah,
Avidyayaa mr’tyum teertvaa vidyayaamr’tamashnute.’

‘Science and nescience, who knows the both simultaneously; by nescience crossing the death, by science, he obtains the eternity.’
–Ved2 Yajurved|40|14
http://www.topix.com/forum/world/pakistan/TT5

Then why don’t you answer him, idiot?
What’s there to be ashamed of?
Even Lord Ram and his brothers were polygamists according to Aarsh Ramayan’:
”Hr’shtaah khalu bhavishyanti
Ramasy’ paramaah striyah,
aprahr’shtaah bhavishyanti
snushaaste Bharatxaye’.’

’12. raamasy’= Ram’s; paramaastriyaH= great wives; bhavanti khalu= will become; hR’ishTaaH= delighted; te= your; snushhaaH= daughters-in-law; bhavishhyanti= will become; aprahR’isTaaH= unhappy; bharatkshhaye= of Bharat’s weak position.

“Ram’s best wives will get delighted. Your daughters-in-law will be unhappy because of Bharat’s waning position.”
Ayodhya Kandam: Sarg 8| Verse 12:
http://www.valmikiramayan.net/ayodhya/sarga8/…

Polygamy: a discarded system of life

Fa’in kħiftum allā tådilū fa wāħidatan

—————————————————————————————–

More thought provoking articles from DSM Satyarthi:

1. Why can’t we love each other?: Innallāh yuħibbul muttaqīn

2. Should we advocate abolishing religion from planet earth?

3. Does religion provide false security?

4. Polygamy: a discarded system of life

——————————————————————————————–

1. On Hinduism

2. On Islam

3. On History

4. Commentary on Ved

5. Science Fiction

6. More Creative Adult Sex in English from Durgesh

7.Durgesh in Hindi/Urdu

———————————————————————————

More on Hinduism from DSM Satyarthi:

1. ‘Bhoorbhuvah svah!’ ‘The Existence! The Consciousness! The Bliss!’

2.‘Devasy’ pashy’ kaavyam, n’ mamaar, n’ jeeryati.’

3. Hinduism shines

4.Ved is the eternal law book having infinite knowledge in it for human beings

5. ‘According to facts’: ‘Yaathaatathyatah’

6. ‘SET THIS WOMAN for WELL DOER’: ‘Imaam naareem Sukr’te dadhaat’

7. The Evernew Hinduism: Yaathaatathyatah: Ved 2|40|8

8. ‘How to cross death’: ‘Tamev viditvaati mr’tyumeti’: Ved2Yajurved|31|18

9. According to Hinduism: We must be polite, not coward

10.Ye yathaa maam prapadyante taanstathaiv bhajaamyaham: Lord Kr’shn

11. N’ karm lipyaté naré

—————————————————————————————————

More on Islam from DSM Satyarthi:

1. Bal huv qur’anum majeedun fe LAUHIM MAHFOOZIN

2. Innahu laquranun kareemun Fee kitabin maknoonin

3. ‘Hudallilmuttaqeen’: ‘Guidance for controllers of organs’: 2 Al Baqarah: 2

4. ‘Alaa qalbik litakoon minal-munzireen’ ‘upon your heart one of who to warn’

5. Muslimahs! Come to India. I recommend Hindu lovers for all the Muslimahs.: Khadeejah Muhammad

6. Islam according to Qur’an and Maulana Maududi rahamatullh alaihi

7. A Moment of grave thinking for the entire sophisticated Muslim Community

8. ‘SET THIS WOMAN for WELL DOER’: ‘Imaam naareem Sukr’te dadhaat’

9. ‘V’ innahu fe UMMALKITAABI ladainaa la’liyyun hakeemun’: 43/4

10. Most Present day Muslms don’t do what Huzoor(SAW) did:

11. The Muslim beauties are wooing Hindu men FASTEST

12. ‘What really matters in the sight of God’: Maulana: Maududi

13. Why did Islam face a counter revolution at Karbala?

14. Why there are differences among us?

15. No differences Please!

16. Llā yamassuhu illā almutahharūn

———————————————————————-

More Commentary on Ved from DSM Satyarthi:

1. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

2. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 1| Mantr 2

3. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 5| Mantr 3

4. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 5| Mantr 3

5. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 7| Mantr 5

6. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 7| Mantr 8

4. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 1

5. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 2

6. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 3

7. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 4

8. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 5

9. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 6

10. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 7

11. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 8

12.R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 9

13. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 58| Mantr 6

14. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 164| Mantr 20

15. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 164| Mantr 46

16. R’gved: Mandal 2| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

17 R’gved: Mandal 3| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

18. R’gved: Mandal 3| Sookt 6| Mantr 2

19. R’gved: Mandal 4| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

20. R’gved: Mandal 4| Sookt 26| Mantr 2

21. R’gved: Mandal 5| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

22. R’gved: Mandal 6| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

23. R’gved: Mandal 7| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

24. R’gved: Mandal 8| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

25. R’gved: Mandal 9| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

26. R’gved: Mandal 9| Sookt 63| Mantr 4-5

27. R’gved: Mandal 10| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

28. R’gved: Mandal 10| Sookt 85| Mantr 42

29. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 1| Mantr 1

30. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 1| Mantr 2

31. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 1| Mantr 3

32. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 1| Mantr 4

33. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 11| Mantr 1

34. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 13| Mantr 4

35. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 23| Mantr 3

36. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 31| Mantr 18

37. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 40| Mantr2

38. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 40| Mantr8

39. Saamved: Mantr 1

40. Sāmved: Mantr 115

41. Sāmved: Mantr 641: Mahānāmnyārchik| 1

42. Sāmved: Mantr 650: Mahānāmnyārchik| 10

43. Sāmved: Mantr 651: Uttarārchik

44. Atharv Ved: Kaand 1| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

45.  Atharv Ved: Kānd 3| Sookt 30| Mantr 3

46. Atharv Ved: Kānd 3| Sookt 30| Mantr 4

47. Atharv Ved: Kānd 3| Sookt 30| Mantr 6

48. Atharv Ved: Kānd 4| Sookt 4| Mantr 6

49. Atharv Ved: Kānd 4| Sookt 4| Mantr 7

50. Atharv Ved: Kānd 4| Sookt 4| Mantr 8

51. Atharv Ved: Kaand 4| Sookt 13| Mantr 1

52. Atharv Ved: Kaand 8| Sookt 1| Mantr 6

53. Atharv Ved: Kaand 8| Sookt 4| Mantr 22

54.  Atharv Ved: Kaand 14| Sookt 1| Mantr 22

55.Atharv Ved: Kaand 14| Sookt 2| Mantr 25

Ved: Ved Bhashy: R’gved: Mandal 10: Sookt 1: Mantr 1

Ved: Ved Bhashy:

R’gved: Mandal 10: Sookt 1: Mantr 1

DSM Satyarthi

———————————————————————————————————————–

1.Agré br’hannushsāmūrdhvo asthānnirjaganvān tamaso jyotishāgāt

Agnirbhānunā rushtā svang ājāto vishvā sadmānyaprāh.

————————————————————————————-

Padpāŧh: Agré| br’han| ushsām|ūrdhvah| asthāt| nih-jaganvān| tamasah| jyotishā| ā| agāt|

Agnih|bhānunā| rushtā| su-angah| ā| jātah| vishvā| sadmāni| aprāh

———————————————————————————

1.  1First, great Agni2, of dawns3; was high4. Came doubtlessly out of darkness5, with brightness6.

With shining light7, beautiful part8, evolved properly9, filled all the dwellings10.

—————————————————————————————

1. This is the tenth Mandal/Book of R’gved.

R’shi: Trit Mahimvat Āptý

Dévtā: Agni

Chhand/Meter: Trishŧup

The Mandal/Book contains 191 Sookts/hymns.

The first Sookt/hymn contains 7 Mantrs/Verses only.

2.‘Br’han agnih’ in original text.

3. ‘Ushasām’.

It enlimits and describes a particular kind of persons who lead to light, meant here by Ved/Eīshān Param Brahm Parmātmā.

He must be of dawns: ‘Ushasām’.

The dawn has a quality to spread its light more and more.

It never complains that there is intense darkness, and it can’t remove the same.

It just penetrates the darkness, and goes on penetrating it more and more until there’s broad daylight.

So, the persons meant here by Ved/Eīshān Param Brahm Parmātmā are the persons who lead to light in extreme darkness.

They never complain that there’s extreme darkness so they can’t lead the others to light.

They just penetrate the darkness, and keep penetrating it until there’s broad daylight.

The second point to remember here, is that though there’s extreme darkness, the persons required to work there are NOT just literates only in Hinduism.

They must be well and fully equipped with the intense knowledge of Hinduism: ‘Br’han agnih’.

It requires a sun to penetrate the intense darkness of night.

Secondly, ‘Ushsaam’ is the plural of ‘Ushas’in shashthi.

If we carefully read  and study all the verses in Ved pertaining to ‘Ushas’ it’s quite evident the word is used for beautiful and vivacious young woman too.

Brahan Agnih Ushsaam‘ ‘Great Agni of beautiful and vivacious young women‘ means, he is not allowed to have an option of leaving the beautiful and vivacious young women. He is made for them. They are his responsibilities.

It rejects the erroneous view that the brilliant and intelligent men must pay attention to their studies only. According to this Vedmantr/verse they must pay attention both to their studies as well as to the beautiful and vivacious young women.

Why beautiful and vivacious young women especially?

Because they need men, and if the Sukr’ts are not intersted in them, ‘Dushkr’ts’, the wickeds,  are always intersted in them with making them their utmost priority.

It does not suit to the Vedic Movement of building a society of Sukr’ts.

One thing more:

‘Br’han Agnih’ ‘Great Agni’ can’t escape from his duties if the beautiful and vivacious young women are not interested in him.

He must study why is it so, if it is so, and then painstakingly he has to see that he must become their dream man. He must improve himself painstakingly so that he can pass their dream criteria of man.

They are his responsibilities after all, and he can’t leave them for dushkr’ts, the wicked ones.

4. ‘ūrdhvo asthāt’.

There isn’t any down place for this ‘Br’han agnih’.

He must remember it, and must be fully equipped and prepared for it.

That’s why it’s necessary that he must be ‘Br’han agnih’.

A person who can lead to light but is not fully equipped and prepared for reaching high, cannot penetrate the intense darkness of nescience.

‘Vidyām chāvidyām ch’

yastadvédobhayagvong sah,

avidyayā mr’tyum tīrtvā

vidyayāmr’atamashnuté.’

‘The person who knoweth well both, Science and Nescience, crossing death by Nescience, by Science gaineth Endless Life.’

Ved: 2 Yajurved: 40|14

Lord Rām has demonstrated it in his life completely.

When there was intense darkness protected by Rāvañ and his almost undefeatable armies of the wicked ones, he did not send others to fight with it.

He fought with it himself and with Laxmañ.

‘Ikchhvākūñāmiyam bhoomih sashailvankānanā

mr’g paximanushyāñām nigrahānugrahéshvapi

tām pālayati dharmātmā Bharatah satývānr’juh

dharmkāmārthtatvagyo nigrahānugrahé ratah

nayashch’ vinayashchobhau

yasmin satyam ch’ susthitam

vikramashch’ yathā dr’shŧah s’ rājā déshkālvit

Tasý dharmkr’tādéshā vayamanýé ch’ pārthivāh

charāmo vasudhām kr’tsnām dharmsatānamichchhavah.’

‘This earth with its mountains, woods, and forests, even along with the authority to condone or condemn the animals, birds, and humans on it belongs to Ikshvaku-s.’|6

‘He who is virtue-souled, truth-abiding, plain-speaking, and the knower of the import of probity, pleasures, and prosperity, and the one who is concerned in controlling or condoning his subjects, that Bharat is the ruler of earth.’|7

‘In whom both scrupulousness and benignancy are there, truthfulness is firmed up, and valour as evinced by scriptures is evident, and he who is the knower of time and place is the king, namely Bharat.’|8

Holding his virtuous decree desiring to keep up the continuum of righteousness, we and some other kings are wayfaring this earth in its entirety.’|9

Aarsh Rāmāyañ: 4 Kishkindhākānd|18| 6-9

R’gved: Mandal  10| Sookt 85| Mantr 42

———————————————————————————–

1.  More Commentary on Ved

2. More On Hinduism

3. On Islam

4. On History

5. Science Fiction

6.  Creative Adult Sex in English from Durgesh

7. Durgesh in Hindi/Urdu

———————————————————————-

Commentary on Ved from DSM Satyarthi:

1. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

2. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 1| Mantr 2

3. R’gved: Mandal 2| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

4. R’gved: Mandal 3| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

5. R’gved: Mandal 4| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

6. R’gved: Mandal 5| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

7. R’gved: Mandal 6| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

8. R’gved: Mandal 7| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

9. R’gved: Mandal 8| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

10. R’gved: Mandal 9| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

11. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 1| Mantr 1

12. Saamved: Mantr 1

13. Atharv Ved: Kaand 1| Sookt 1| Mantr 1