Should we really ban Islam?

Should we really ban Islam?

DSM Satyarthi

‘Islam is a cult.

It is time to wake up and realize that this cult is a threat to mankind and there can be no co-existence with Muslims.

As long as Muslims believe in Muhammad, they are a threat to others and to themselves.

Muslims must either leave Islam, discard their culture of hate and join the rest of mankind as fellow humans, or non-Muslims must separate themselves from them, ban Islam, end the immigration of Muslims and send home those who plot against democracy and refuse to integrate.’

 

These are the words, word by word, written by Dr. Ali Sina in his most important book, ‘Understanding Muħammad: A Psychobiography of Allah’s prophet’ on page 7.

I won’t go in the useless time consuming discussion whether Dr. Ali Sina is right or Islam.

I want to discuss here about the solutions of Dr. Ali Sina he has proposed to get rid of the problems the entire humanity is facing, due to Islam, in his well-perused opinion.

I promise not to deviate from it, unless it isn’t utmost necessary.

 

Dr. Ali Sina’s solutions are:

Firstly, Muslims must leave Islam, discard their culture of hate and join the rest of mankind as fellow humans.

Isn’t it against Democracy not to let Muslims decide what they themselves must do?

Of course, we can’t, and we shouldn’t ever, let any human society, Muslims or someone else whosoever, to have a culture of hate against any human group whatsoever.

Yet, should we do it by banning that particular society or by teaching and punishing her if she still acts against humanity?

We should never forget, as for as India is concerned, Indian Muslims have contributed to make present Indian society in a very big manner.

They never hated their fellow citizens Hindus as we find in other countries.

If they had, India couldn’t have been a Hindu Majority country still now.

Even the too much-fussed Two Nation Theory of Muħammad Ålī Jinnah could not make entire Musalmīn to leave India and go to Pakistan.

Can anyone say today that Indian Musalmīn don’t love India, instead they love Pakistan more?

Why Dr. Ali Sina’s theory that Islam itself is a culture of hate never worked in India?

 

It isn’t a simple question to be ignored in a general way.

Instead, I claim it’s the utmost important question that must be answered before planning any campaign to abolish Islam herself from everywhere.

 

Why Dr. Ali Sina’s theory that Islam itself is a culture of hate never worked in India?

Islam was always one of the most popular ideologies in India in Hindus even.

The Hindus go to Ajmer Sharīf more, than even the Musalmīn do.

Isn’t it a fact?

Apply Dr. Ali Sina’s theory that Islam itself is a culture of hate and explain this phenomenon in India.

You can’t avoid it.

You can’t ignore it ever.

 

Isn’t it a fact that the first holy war of Independence of India was fought in 1857 under the leadership of the great Mughal Emperor, Bahādur Shah Zafar?

If Hindus were hated by the Musalmīn and had really suffered in their rule, why the hell they wanted to establish Muslim rule against the then East India Company rule?

Why their leader wasn’t some Hindu, instead of Bahādur Shah Zafar?

 

Shouldn’t Dr. Ali Sina and his co authors explain this historical phenomenon in India?

 

Dr. Ali Sina’s second proposed solution to the Pseudo Islamic terrorism is:

Non-Muslims must separate themselves from Muslims, ban Islam, end the immigration of Muslims and send home those who plot against democracy and refuse to integrate.’

It is exactly what was done in Partition of India.

Non Muslims didn’t separate themselves from Muslims, but the Pseudo Musalmīn then themselves separated from then Hindus.

Somewhat the same thing is still being done by present day Pseudo Musalmīn everywhere.

It isn’t even needed now for Non Musalmīn to separate Muslims from them.

The ever stupid Pseudo Musalmīn are already doing it themselves everywhere and deliberately, either clandestinely or openly, conspiring against Non Muslims, plotting terrorist activities against them.

These ever stupid Pseudo Musalmīn are not creative, not productive, neither they want to be ever.

They even don’t understand no human society can survive herself if she isn’t creative and productive.

They only want to kill the Non Muslims so that they themselves can get Jannat.

Does Islam really preach this ever anti-human doctrine?

 

Dr. Ali Sina and his co authors say ‘Yes’.

Yet, the learned persons who have really perused Islam without any bias, say ‘No, Certainly Not’.

Al Qur’an Al Karīm says:

Muħammadurrasūlullāhi.

Wallazīn måhu Ashiddao Ǻlā alkuffāri ruħmāo baynahum.’

Muħammad is the Messenger of Allah.

And those with him are severe against Al Kuffār, Merciful among themselves.’

Al Qur’an Al Karīm : 48 Al Fatħ| 29

Pseudo Musalmīn terrorists and criminal/criminal minded Pseudo Musalmīn have interpreted this āyat-e-Karīmah in their favor that this āyat-e-Karīmah orders them to kill the non Musalmīn.

They go ahead further and quote one more āyat from Al Qur’an Al Karīm to support their vile interests:

Fa qatulū almusharikīn

ħaisu wajadttumūhum.’

 Then kill the associators

wherever you find them.

Al Qur’an Al Kareem: 9 Attawbah|5

 

Well, it’s the interpretation Yazīd MalåūnǺrab

Burdāfaroshs and their supporters Mullahs and Maulavīs allotted to it

They damn cared if this interpretation of this āyat-e-Karīmah is against Al Qur’an Al Kareem itself.*

 

The Pseudo Musalmīn terrorists and criminal/criminal minded Pseudo Musalmīn keep repeating only two āyat-e-karīmahs:

Muħammadurrasūlullāhi.

Wallazīn måhu Ashiddao Ǻlā alkuffāri ruħmāo baynahum.’

Muħammad is the Messenger of Allah.

And those with him are severe against Al Kuffār, Merciful among themselves.’

Al Qur’an Al Karīm : 48 Al Fatħ| 29

 ‘Fa qatulū almusharikīn

ħaisu wajadttumūhum’

Then kill the associators

wherever you find them

 —Al Qur’an Al Kareem: 9 Attawbah|5

They keep repeating these two āyat-e-karīmahs as if the entire Islam is centralized on these two āyat-e-karīmahs.

Is it true?

Anyone who has really perused Islam without any bias, without any prejudice, can tell everyone it isn’t.

Isn’t it a negative approach of these PseudoMusalmīn terrorists and criminal/criminal minded PseudoMusalmīn to their own religion if their claim is taken prima facie?

 

Now, let’s analyze their claim itself.

How many PseudoMusalmīn terrorists and criminal/criminal minded Pseudo Musalmīn are there in the entire Ummat-eMuslimah?

51%?

More?

49%?

Less?

What about the rest of the Musalmīn who aren’t Pseudo Musalmīn terrorists and criminal/criminal minded Pseudo Musalmīn, neither they ever were?

Why should they suffer for something they haven’t done ever?

Because their fellow religionists did it?

Is it justice to them?

 

What the hell we want?

To face their injustice with our own injustice?

Then how the hell are we better than Pseudo Musalmīn terrorists and criminal/criminal minded Pseudo Musalmīn?

Can’t we really teach them humanity?

Can’t even we punish them if they refuse to learn?

The entire humankind can’t do it?

Are the Pseudo Musalmīn terrorists and criminal/criminal minded PseudoMusalmīn so much large in number?

Are they so much capable in resources even?

Isn’t what I propose more justified, more rational, more logical, more practical and more human?

 

Why compel even the Musalmīn that believe in humanity to join these inhuman PseudoMusalmīn terrorists and criminal/criminal minded Pseudo Musalmīn?

 

Isn’t that’s what you are proposing to do?

 

Even if I believe, though I can’t be so insane ever to believe it, what you say:

Every Musalmān is a terrorist or a potential terrorist.’

Isn’t it smarter to break the unity of our common enemy?

If a large number of such Musalmīn claim they aren’t with these wretched animals, the Pseudo Musalmīn terrorists and criminal/criminal minded Pseudo Musalmīn, why shouldn’t we take advantage of it?

Why should we send them too to our enemy’s camp?

To strengthen our enemy’s capability to fight with us more effectively?

Must be us so stupid?

I don’t think so.

I can’t even imagine to think as stupid as it’s being proposed.

———————————————————-

Islam according to Ved

More from DSM Satyarthi:

1. On Islam

2. On History

3.  Commentary on Ved

4. More On Hinduism

5. Science Fiction

6.  Creative Adult Sex in English from Durgesh

7. Durgesh in Hindi/Urdu

Innallāh lā yahdī alqawmalfāsiqīn

Innallāh lā yahdī alqawmalfāsiqīn

 

In fact, Allah guideth not the fāsiqīn,

who bring chaos

 

DSM Satyarthi

Al Qur’an Al Karīm specifically and expressly deals with the persons that are not honest, not sincere, in their interaction with other persons.

Its 63rd Sūrat, Al Munāfiqūn, especially deals of such persons.

The Musalmīn of India are facing nowadays a severe political problem.

After 67 years of Independence of India, they are now feeling that they are cheated so long politically by their so called well wisher, pseudo seculars.

Who is responsible for it?

Their so called well wisher, pseudo seculars?

Certainly not.

Never blunder once again.

We, Musalmīn, ourselves, are responsible for it, none else.

Al Qur’an Al Karīm guides us ab initio:

Ihdi nassirātal mustaqīm

‘Guide us to the straight path.’

1 Al Fātiħah: 6

Sirātallazīn anåmt ålayhim ghairimaghzūbi ålayhim wa lā azzwāllīn

The path of the persons who earned your bounty, not of those who evoked your wrath, nor of those who go astray.’

1 Al Fātiħah: 7

Now, let’s analyze our past 67 years.

What the hell we did in this wretched period that these munāfiqīn could succeed in cheating us so successfully?

Why Allah didn’t guide us the ‘sirātal mustaqīm’, the straight path’?

 

Did, nauzbillah, Allah Himself has cheated us too?

It can’t be.

Allah never cheats someone who never cheats Him.

Alħamdulillāhi Rabbil åālmīn.

So, now we enter in the troubling zone.

Have we ourselves cheated Allah, therefore Allah cheated us?

Are we fāsiqīn, the persons who bring chaos that consequently Allah didn’t guide us?

Well, let’s think honestly, sincerely, not for others, for ourselves at least.

Can we be sincere to ourselves at least?

Is it possible Allah has punished us for our indefinite persistent tolerance to terrorism in His name?

Why the hell shouldn’t He?

Innallāh lā yahdī alqawmalfāsiqīn

In fact, Allah guideth not the fāsiqīn,

who bring chaos.

Al Qur’an Al Karīm: 63|6

Isn’t it clear thus also why Allah doesn’t guide the terrorists and criminals?

They too are fāsiqīn in Allah’s eyes.

Try to explain why otherwise they aren’t guided.

Isn’t it a fact that:

Wallāhu yakħtassu biraħmatihi man yashāu

And Allah selects for His Mercy whom He wills

─ 2 Al Baqarah| 105

Not whom the Musalmīn/Ummat-eMuslimah wills.

We forgot it.

Yet our forgetting some law doesn’t imply ever that Allah does too forget it.

We have to follow Allah’s constitution, Allah doesn’t have to follow whatever the hell we understand erroneously due to our vile vested interests.

Wallāhu zul fazlil åzīmi

And Allah is of great bounty.’

─ 2 Al Baqarah| 105

——————————————————————————————————-

Islam according to Ved

More from DSM Satyarthi:

1. On Islam

2. On History

3.  Commentary on Ved

4. More On Hinduism

5. Science Fiction

6.  Creative Adult Sex in English from Durgesh

7. Durgesh in Hindi/Urdu

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Al Muħammad Al Qāsim’s utmost greedy relatives

Al Muħammad Al Qāsim’s

 utmost greedy relatives

  1.    Al Nadīm Al Quddūs Al Muħammad Al Qāsim’ half/real brother
  2.     Al Safiyah Al Ghaus Al Nadīm Al Quddūs’s awfully stunning wife, a mastermind, ex hostess of Las Vegas Nevada gambling house, the real brain power against Al Waħīdah Al Tawīd and Al Muħammad Al Qāsim.
  3.        Al Zakiyah Al Qāsim, Al Muħammad Al Qāsim’s sister
  4.          Vikram Bachhalyā, Al Zakiyah Al Qāsim’s husband
  5.           Al Lubnā Al Qāsim, Al Muħammad Al Qāsim’s one more sister
  6.           Pratāp Bachhalyā, Al Lubnā Al Qāsim’s husband
  7.          Al Hudā Al Qāsim Al Hāshmī, their advocate
  8.          Naåīmah Muħammad Ħasan, Al Safiyah Al Ghaus’s friend, philosopher and guide
  9. Naåīmah Muħammad Ħasan’s Seven Movements

—————————————————————

1. More Creative Adult Sex in English from Durgesh

2.Durgesh in Hindi/Urdu

3. Science Fiction

4. On History

5. Commentary on Ved

6. On Hinduism

7. On Islam

TafsīlAlKitābi

TafsīlAlKitābi

A detailed explanation of the Scripture

DSM Satyarthi

Va mā kān hāzalqur’anu anyuftarā min dūnillāhi va lākin tasdīqallazī bayn yadéhi va tafsīlAlKitābi lā raib fīhi min rabbil åālmīn.’

And it was not for this Qur’an to be produced by other than Allah , but a confirmation of what was before it and a detailed explanation of The Scripture, about which there is no doubt, from the Lord of the worlds.’

̶—Al Qur’an Al Kareem10 Yunus:37

——————————————————————————

More on Islam from DSM Sayarthi:

1. Bal huv qur’anum majeedun fe LAUHIM MAHFOOZIN

2. Innahu laquranun kareemun Fee kitabin maknoonin

3. ‘Hudallilmuttaqeen’: ‘Guidance for controllers of organs’: 2 Al Baqarah: 2

4. ‘Alaa qalbik litakoon minal-munzireen’ ‘upon your heart one of who to warn’

5. Islam according to Qur’an and Maulana Maududi rahamatullh alaihi

Ashiddao Ǻlā alkuffāri ruħmāo baynahum

Ashiddao Ǻlā alkuffāri

ruħmāo baynahum

Severe against Kuffār

Merciful among themselves

DSM Satyarthi

Al Qur’an Al Kareem Sūrat Al Fataħ 48:29 states:

Muħammadurrasūlullāhi.

Wallazīn måhu Ashiddao Ǻlā alkuffāri ruħmāo baynahum.’

Muħammad is the Messenger of Allah.

And those with him are severe against Al Kuffār, Merciful among themselves.’

Musalmān terrorists and criminal/criminal

minded Musalmīn have interpreted this āyat-e-Karīmah in their favor that this āyat-e-Karīmah orders them to kill the non Musalmīn.

Well, it’s the interpretation Yazīd Malåūn, Ǻrab Burdāfaroshs and their supporters Mullahs and Maulavīs allotted to it.

They damn cared if this interpretation of this āyat-e-Karīmah is against Al Qur’an Al Kareem itself.

——————————————————————————–

More from DSM Satyarthi:

1. On Islam

2. On History

3.  Commentary on Ved

4. More On Hinduism

5. Science Fiction

6.  Creative Adult Sex in English from Durgesh

7. Durgesh in Hindi/Urdu

Ayesha Ahmed disagrees with the Women’s High status and Privileged Position

Ayesha Ahmed disagrees

with the

Women’s High status

and Privileged Position

DSM Satyarthi

Some of my readers have taken the trouble to inform me that an article of Ayesha Ahmed is not available to them when they click the link I’ve given to them in some of my writings.

I don’t know why it is so, if it is so.

However, I copy paste that article here for their, as well as others’ benefit, as I have previously did for some of the writings of my intimate friends Khadijah Muhammad and Sidrah Ahmad:

Women’s High status and

Privileged Position

by Ayesha Ahmed : Aug 2, 2003 :

Dear sisters: How many times have you heard this claim “sisters, you should be very happy that you have a very high status and a very privileged position in our religion” by the bearded ones in the mosques?

God alone knows what high status and which privileged position they talk about….

To be declared in the holy books that we are deficient in intelligence and that most of us will go to hell for being ungrateful to our husbands; and that we will make the big majority of the hell’s population?

To be told to share the husband with three other wives and many concubines, sex slaves and captive women which his right hand posses?

To be divorced by him at the drop of a hat by just his proclaiming 3 times “I divorce you” and we not having the same right to divorce him?

Husband getting 72 perpetually virgin beautiful houris with big eyes and swelling bosoms in the paradise and we getting the same old husband and share him with the 72 voluptuous houris? (Believe me sisters; he will be so busy there with the lovely houris that the only time he will see you will be in the hallways when he is going from one houri’s room to another houri’s room).

To be disciplined by the husband, by being beaten up by him with scourge (lash) and green sticks? (Unless you are into the kinky stuff and actually enjoy the beatings)..

Being raped and then be stoned to death for reporting it because you need 4 male witnesses to prove your innocence otherwise you yourself get accused of adultery? (Your only chance of finding 4 male witnesses is that if the attacker was of very low IQ or was really drunk and attacked you in the broad daylight in front of a bunch of degenerate horny men who watched and cheered and are later willing to testify)

Being wrongly accused of adultery by a conniving husband and be stoned for it because he does not need 4 male witnesses if he swears 4 times himself?

Being married at the age of 9 years to a much older man because it is sunna? To submit to him every time he desires you even if he wants it on the back of a camel, if he gets an untimely urge? (Not recommended, you both may fall down from camel’s back during the action and sustain injuries).

Being cursed all night by thousands of angels if you refuse him even for a genuine reason? (What a boring job for angels who are assigned to watch your bedroom, always waiting for the action, unless of course they enjoy watching; in that case they have a reason to be disappointed and pissed by your refusal).

To be declared half a person as witness in court or inheriting property?

To be asked to stay at home by scriptures and only leave home if husband permits; that too fully covered by a tent like garment even if it is scorching hot (hey, sweating is good for you as it opens skin pores, besides the tent covering protects you from the hot sun and elements which keeps you fair and beautiful; sisters you need all the help you can get to compete with the other wives and concubines).

The Muslim Beauties are wooing Hindu Men FASTEST

—————————————————————————————

More from DSM Satyarthi:

1.  Commentary on Ved

2. More On Hinduism

3. On Islam

4. On History

5. Science Fiction

6.  Creative Adult Sex in English from Durgesh

7. Durgesh in Hindi/Urdu

Actually what the Western Culture is?

Actually what the Western

Culture

is?

DSM Satyarthi

There are some persons who think I am the profoundest critic of the Western Culture.

They, naturally, are surprised immensely when they find that my own standard of living, and that of my family, is itself based profoundly on Western Culture.

Only my values are Indian/Hindu.

Why so?

Because I believe in FAMILY.

Sorry, most of the Westerners have lost their family altogether, either completely or at least on the path of losing it.

I don’t want to be one of them.

I not only believe in family, I believe in United family too.

The destruction of the family in the West is the root cause of most of the crimes, madness and suicides there.

Naturally, I want to safeguard my family members, and myself too, from these quite inescapable consequences if I too blindly follow the Westerners as so many of my friends are doing in their blind imprudent enthusiasm.

The Westerners are unfortunate enough that they couldn’t safeguard their families from these ultimate destructive negative consequences.

They were gradually led to it.

How?

We can easily find out and understand it if we really want to.

The million dollar question is do we really want to find out and understand  it?

We should be at least sincere enough to admit to ourselves that most of us don’t want to do even it.

What a tragedy!

Most of us want to keep our eyes closed and continue to march ahead further in the path of destruction only because we don’t want to bring any POSITIVE change in our life style.

The fact we forget/ignore when we resort to this ever-detrimental luxury is that when we refuse to change ourselves, actually we refuse to follow our own evolution process.

We forget our evolution process is still continued.

It’s not complete yet.

Humanity is NOT the end of our evolution.

It’s only a temporary stoppage whence the journey of evolution is still continued ahead.

Our Creator hasn’t designed us to end as a human being only.

Our Creator hasn’t designed us to end as a mortal only.

Death is not an inescapable ultimate truth of life.

Most of the Westerners and their ever-blind ever-adamant supporters think every thing lies beyond our body.

Hinduism/Ved suggests us it certainly isn’t a fact.

Hinduism/Ved suggests instead everything is inside ourselves.

We can evolve ourselves even to the extent to be immortal and quite capable enough even to control the entire infinite Multiverse if we actually want it.

Our body/brain is the ultimate ever best creation, of our Creator.

If we use it properly optimum prudently, we don’t need anything outside except our sexual counterparts.

We can ourselves produce everything we need if we meditate and have our sexual counterparts with us.

Most of the Westerners/atheists do not even believe it, even if they are informed that it’s a fact.

They are, I’m sorry to inform them, but I can’t help it, childishly, incurable, negative thinkers.

They think life is not a permanent phenomenon the death is instead.

Hinduism/Ved is uncompromisingly, inflexibly, rigorously, resolutely, unwaveringly, unyieldingly, determinedly, doggedly, and absolutely against this ever detrimental negative attitude towards life.

————————————————————————–

More from DSM Satyarthi:

1.  Commentary on Ved

2. More On Hinduism

3. On Islam

4. On History

5. Science Fiction

6.  Creative Adult Sex in English from Durgesh

7. Durgesh in Hindi/Urdu

Ved: 4 Atharv Ved: Kānd 14| Vivāh Kānd: Sookt 1| Mantr 2

Ved: Ved Bhāshý

4 Atharv Ved

 Kānd 14 Vivāh Kānd:

 Sūkt 1| Mantr 2

DSM Satyarthi

—————————————————————————————————————

1By Som  Ādityās strong2 by Som Earth great3

No doubt4, in the genital organ of these constellations5, Som is established optimum6.

————————————————————————————————–

1.R’shikā: Sūryā Sāvitrī

Dévtā/ Divine Subject: Som

Chhand/Meter: Anushŧup

2. Ved is revealed in a telegraphic language, not in any ordinary language.

This basic fact, about Ved, always must be remembered while studying Ved gravely.

I’m sorry to say that the Westerners never studied Ved gravely.

I’m sorrier to say that the Westerners were never serious not only about Ved.

They were never equally serious about Bible and Qur’an too, as well.

These scriptures were never seriously studied by the Westerners.

If they were ever studied seriously, by the Westerners; the Western Culture, now on the path of its certain suicide, would never were on its suicidal path.

It was an unfortunate tragedy that when Ved, Bible and Qur’an were being studied by the Westerners, the Communism was fighting its own war of survival with religion.

It made the Communist thinkers more biased those days than they are not biased even today.

No biased studies should be taken seriously ever.

Yet, isn’t it a tragedy that, the entirely biased studies of those days, by the Communist thinkers are still being taken seriously?

Isn’t it a time to re-study Ved, Bible, Qur’an and the related literature more seriously, scientifically and absolutely unbiased, for a change?

We have one more benefit the Communist thinkers of those days didn’t have.

The Communism in those days was utopian somewhat, even after the great scientific studies Karl Marx and Frederick Engels did then.

It was not a scientific fact, known those days that, the Multiverse is made of vibrations of energy basically.

This fact, revealed and accepted scientifically afterwards, has changed the entire scenario of scientific studies about the matters the Communist thinkers had done their studies.

Marriage institution is also one of them.

The persons who have studied Western Culture seriously know very well that the Western Culture does not stand on scientific grounds only.

In fact, no culture can ever stand on scientific grounds only howsoever it insists to stand.

Any theory, any fact, when it is brought into practice always succumbs to human emotions prevailing those days.

It has to.

It hasn’t another option if it has to come into practice.

Humans never react scientifically only.

Neither can they ever do it.

Scientific facts are never emotional until they are facts only.

As soon as they are brought into practice they have to deal with the humans.

Humans include both males and females.

Not only females are emotional ones, the males are also not very different in the matter.

No doubt, the females are more emotionals than the males.

Nevertheless, even the males are not devoid of emotions absolutely.

Hence, any scientific fact, however factually it is known to us, when brought into practice, is bound to succumb to the emotional needs of the humans those are bringing it into practice.

That’s why the theory and practice always differ howsoever honest its implementers are.

That’s why even Eīshān Param Brahm Paramātmā has instructed us not to confine ourselves to the principles only i.e. Ved, but  to the very Mission of Life/ExistenceKr’ñvanto VishvamāryamDharm Santānam, Dharm Sansthāpan, as well; to bring the principles into practice and study Divý Itihās, the Divine History for it:

  1. Dhiyo yo nah prachodayāt
  2. Yāthātathyatah

This fact, once realized in its full form, can immensely help us to re-study about marriage institution once opposed by the Communist thinkers so insistently, so persistently.

The Communist thinkers of those days found marriage institution an immensely avoidable obstacle in their pathway to Communism.

They thought marriage institutions give birth to Private Property.

The Communist thinkers were right.

But they were not right in thinking that the family was the only institution that caused the accumulation of Private Property.

Moreover, owing to immense drastic failure of communist economic, social and political system around the entire globe, we have to think more gravely now do we really need to oppose private property anymore.

Aren’t the financial scams, not done by the advocates of Private Property, more serious, more dangerous and more destructive to the humanity and Democracy than the Private Property itself is?

We should never forget that the destruction of Private Property absolutely, leads to destroy the family itself.

Frederick Engels has already written in the subject as much as we don’t need any analysis more to understand the subject comprehensively.

We need Private Property to protect and safeguard a family.

We have no other option to it.

Consequently, why not support Welfare Capitalism and State Capitalism instead of opposing Private Property?

We have experienced bitterly that our industries can’t survive in so-called Communism.

Moreover, we have experienced bitterly too that Communism has led to a totalitarianism called Stalinism now.

We need industries to go ahead.

In fact, we need industries to march ahead.

The Welfare Capitalism and State Capitalism are more suitable for it then the so-called Communism or the ‘Socialism’ prone to nonstop Scams.

Shouldn’t we think over it more gravely now?

Today, we can easily observe around us that even the singles have Private Property.

Moreover, to be more exactly honest and sincere, the entire history of humankind has proven now that the singles crave for Private Property even more than the married persons do.

Why is it so?

Because the married persons have their family to take care of them in their old age, while the singles don’t.

They have only their money to take care of them in their old age.

It is the reason why the singles are found more corrupt than the married persons in accumulating Private Property and wealth.

That’s why Hinduism does not support single life, except only when a single can’t afford even a single wife.

It specifically orders:

S’ nah pitév sūnavé’gné sūpāyano bhav,

Sachasvā nah svastayé.’

‘He, be unto us, as a father to son, Agni, easy to access.

Be together optimum, properly, for our welfare.’

—      Ved: R’gved: 1| 1| 9

Ihaiv stam mā vi yaushŧam vishvamāyurvyashnutam,

Krīdantau putrairnaptr’bhirmodmānau své gr’hé.’

‘Abide ye both only here. Don’t be separated. Enjoy whole life sporting with sons grandsons, rejoicing in own home.’

—      Ved: R’gved: 10| 85| 42

Ihaiv stam mā vi yaushŧam vishvamāyurvyashnutam,

Krīdantau putrairnaptr’bhirmodmānau svastakau.’

‘Abide ye both only here. Don’t be separated. Enjoy whole life sporting with sons grandsons4, rejoicing in the lovely home.’

—      Ved: Atharv Ved: 14|1|22

The Communist thinkers never thought, neither they could, in those days of too limited resources to research anything that, marriage institution was not the only vice in their pathway to Communism.

In fact, the singles are more severe problems in their way.

The Communist thinkers wildly opposed marriage institution and family.

In fact they are still opposing it blindly, not even realizing the fact that the entire history of humankind has already proven them wrong now.

The Communism as a movement has lost its original momentum now.

It is not because it’s nonsense, as it’s claimed by its blind communal opponents.

The Communism as a movement is not nonsense.

It is necessary for the uplifting of the downtroddens.

Even Hinduism has the same goal as The Communism as a movement has.

The point where Hinduism differs with the Communism as a movement is not its goal, its means of implementation instead.

So, the Communism as a movement doesn’t need to oppose either marriage institution or family ever to achieve its mission.

Hinduism, Islam, Judaism, Christianity, in fact no religion, basically, is in opposition to the Communism as a movement, at all.

The Communism as a movement believed that the mission could be achieved through the dictatorship of the laborers.

The subsequent history of humankind has now expressly proven that such a belief of the then Communists was wrong.

Why?

Because, as already said, the Communism was then only a theory.

It was never practiced by its propellers.

Every theory when it is brought into practice, always refines itself.

No theorist can ever anticipate, absolutely and flawlessly, what lies in its pathway in future.

After all, every theorist, whatsoever theory he/she propels, is a human being, and bound to remain a human being.

A human being is not an omniscient, neither he/she ever can be.

So, howsoever the theory he/she proposes is flawless when propelled, it’s bound to prove in future that it wasn’t so.

The laborers never knew how the enterprises are built up and run.

If they had known how to build up enterprises and how to run them, they would have already done it without any help of the Communist thinkers.

Why have they waited for the moment the Communist thinkers declare them the dictators of a country?

To build up any enterprise first of all an enterpriser has to dream of it to the extent that it becomes an obsession to him/her.

Until and unless it isn’t an obsession to him even an enterpriser can’t build up any enterprise let alone any laborer or a group of laborers.

An enterpriser builds up his/her enterprise first in his/her own mind with its each and every minutest details.

He is so obsessed with these minutest details that, he sees it in his mind.

This imaginary vision in his/her mind always exists in his/her mind while he/she attempts to bring it into fact.

Until and unless this obsession does not become his/her madness, he/she can’t bring into existence.

It’s also a labor, the original Communist thinkers never realized.

That’s why when they took hold of the excellently running enterprises and put them under the dictatorship of the laborers, even the excellently running enterprises failed to continue.

The dictators lacked this vision, this obsession, and this madness.

It was the oxygen an enterpriser supplies to the enterprises.

Unfortunately only he/she can do it, none else.

The Communist thinkers never realized it.

The Communist thinkers made the laborers dictators on the shrewd persons who knew very well how to win the obstacles in their pathways.

They bribed the laborers in administration heavily.

The laborers in administration had never seen money.

They surrendered to the bribery of shrewdest businesspersons.

The movement started suffering heavily.

And ultimately it flopped.

It had to.

The laborers in administration were most of the persons who were everlosers.*

Watch your present day politicians.

Who are they?

Isn’t it a fact that most of them are the persons who are highly Uneducated/Under educated?

Isn’t it a fact that so many of them are criminal/criminal minded?

Why is it so?

Because most of the laborers in administration were dictators, but the persons they dictated were shrewder and more efficient.

The businesspersons became kingmakers instead of kings.

Apparently the businesspersons were not administrators, the chosen representatives of the people were.

But the businesspersons were kingmakers and shrewder.

The dictatorship of the Uneducated/Under educated ones, on shrewder persons, made itself ineffective.

Administration requires prudence.

The laborers in administration hadn’t developed it.

The system, consequently, failed.

It had to.*

Ved: 4 Atharv Ved: Kānd 14| Vivāh Kānd: Sookt 1| Mantr 3

——————————————————————————

More Commentary on Ved from DSM Satyarthi:

1. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

2. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 1| Mantr 2

3. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 1| Mantr 3

4. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 5| Mantr 3

5. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 7| Mantr 5

6. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 7| Mantr 8

4. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 1

5. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 2

6. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 3

7. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 4

8. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 5

9. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 6

10. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 7

11. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 8

12.R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 9

13. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 33| Mantr 1

14. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 33| Mantr 2

14. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 58| Mantr 6

15. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 164| Mantr 20

16. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 164| Mantr 46

17. R’gved: Mandal 2| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

18 R’gved: Mandal 3| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

19. R’gved: Mandal 3| Sookt 6| Mantr 2

20. R’gved: Mandal 4| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

21. R’gved: Mandal 4| Sookt 26| Mantr 2

22. R’gved: Mandal 5| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

23. R’gved: Mandal 6| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

24. R’gved: Mandal 7| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

25. R’gved: Mandal 8| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

26. R’gved: Mandal 9| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

27. R’gved: Mandal 9| Sookt 63| Mantr 4-5

28. R’gved: Mandal 10| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

29. R’gved: Mandal 10| Sookt 85| Mantr 42

30. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 1| Mantr 1

31. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 1| Mantr 2

32. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 1| Mantr 3

33. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 1| Mantr 4

34. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 11| Mantr 1

35. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 13| Mantr 4

36. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 23| Mantr 3

37. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 31| Mantr 18

38. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 40| Mantr2

39. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 40| Mantr8

40. Saamved: Mantr 1

41. Sāmved: Mantr 115

42. Sāmved: Mantr 641: Mahānāmnyārchik| 1

43. Sāmved: Mantr 650: Mahānāmnyārchik| 10

44. Sāmved: Mantr 651: Uttarārchik

45. Atharv Ved: Kaand 1| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

46.  Atharv Ved: Kānd 3| Sookt 30| Mantr 3

47. Atharv Ved: Kānd 3| Sookt 30| Mantr 4

48. Atharv Ved: Kānd 3| Sookt 30| Mantr 6

49. Atharv Ved: Kānd 4| Sookt 4| Mantr 6

50. Atharv Ved: Kānd 4| Sookt 4| Mantr 7

51. Atharv Ved: Kānd 4| Sookt 4| Mantr 8

52. Atharv Ved: Kaand 4| Sookt 13| Mantr 1

53. Atharv Ved: Kaand 8| Sookt 1| Mantr 6

54. Atharv Ved: Kaand 8| Sookt 4| Mantr 22

55. Atharv Ved: Kaand 14| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

56. Atharv Ved: Kaand 14| Sookt 1| Mantr 2

57. Atharv Ved: Kaand 14| Sookt 1| Mantr 3

58. Atharv Ved: Kaand 14| Sookt 1| Mantr 4

59.  Atharv Ved: Kaand 14| Sookt 1| Mantr 22

60.Atharv Ved: Kaand 14| Sookt 2| Mantr 25

Ved: 4 Atharv Ved: Kānd 14| Vivāh Kānd: Sookt 1| Mantr 1

Ved: Ved Bhāshý

4 Atharv Ved

 Kānd 14 Vivāh Kānd:

 Sūkt 1| Mantr 1

DSM Satyarthi

———————————————————————————

Satyénottabhitā bhūmih sūryéñottabhitā dyauh,

R’ténādityāstishŧhanti divi somo adhi shritah.

—————————————————————————-

 1By truth, the Earth is balanced2. By Sun, the celestial system is balanced optimum3. By Eternal Truth Ādityās stand4. In the celestial system, Som is set rightfully5.

————————————————————————

 1.R’shikā: Sūryā Sāvitrī

Dévtā/ Divine Subject: Ātmā, Soul

Chhand/Meter: Trishŧup

2. ‘Satyénottabhitā bhūmih’.

Uttabhitā’ is feminine gender of ‘Ut-stabh’.

According to Āchārý Sāyañ, as every Western scholar of Ved claims to follow Āchārý Sāyañ, whether he really does follow Āchārý Sāyañ or not, W. D. Whitney has also suggested the same, in his famous translation of Atharv Ved.

It does not mean, however, that this Commentary of Ved accepts the authority of W. D. Whitney, Ralph Thomas Hotchkin Griffith or Āchārý Sāyañ.

Never.

This Commentary of Ved accepts the authority of Ved, Shākhā Granths, Brāhmañ Granths, Ārañyaks, Upanishads, Nighanŧu, Nirukt and Vedic Sanskr’t Grammar only.

It can always be proved profoundly that the translations of W. D. Whitney, Āchārý Sāyañ, and other Western scholars, of Ved, do materially differ from Ved, Shākhā Granths, Brāhmañ Granths, Ārañyaks, Upanishads, Nighanŧu, Nirukt and Vedic Sanskr’t Grammar.

The translations of W. D. Whitney, Āchārý Sāyañ, and other Western scholars, of Ved, are either contradictory to Ved, Shākhā Granths, Brāhmañ Granths, Ārañyaks, Upanishads, Nighanŧu, Nirukt and Vedic Sanskr’t Grammar, or immensely poor translations of Ved, even if they follow Ved, Shākhā Granths, Brāhmañ Granths, Ārañyaks, Upanishads, Nighanŧu, Nirukt and Vedic Sanskr’t Grammar, anywhere.

The Western scholars of Ved and their so-called Indian advocates claim the Western translations of Ved depict the true form of Ved as it was being practiced by Hindus initially.

Of course, their such claims are profoundly wrong and self contradictory.

The Commentary of Ved by Āchārý Sāyañ cannot be written before Āchārý Sāyañ, himself.

It is obvious from the request of King of Vijay Nagar Empire, to Āchārý Mādhav, that no Commentary of Ved was found those days, that explained the logic of Ved as it was used in Yāgnik rituals.

Āchārý Mādhav, the elder brother of Āchārý Sāyañ, refused immediately to grant the request of King of Vijay Nagar Empire, declaring it an unnecessary effort and not beneficial to Hindus too.

The King of Vijay Nagar Empire could not understand it.

He was only a king, not a scholar of Ved or Vedic Sanskr’t.

He requested to Āchārý Sāyañ, the younger brother of Āchārý Mādhav, to do the task seeking the guidance of his elder brother, Āchārý Mādhav, whenever, whatsoever and wherever it was available to him, as he was his real younger brother.

Satyénottabhitā bhūmih’ ‘By truth, the Earth is balanced’ means that even in marriage, never deviate from truth as it is told in Ved.

There are so many persons, especially in these days of rotten Western Culture, who ridicule the persons following truth in marriage activities.

They imply that it isn’t necessary anywhere to practice truth if it is not beneficial to the practitioners.

Even if it is beneficial to them in the long run, the Westerners and their Eastern followers profoundly and shamelessly disapprove of following it.

They treat such persons backward and either ridicule them or at least treat them sympathetically, as if they are doing any sin following the truth.

Ved rejects this dangerous policy ab initio.

It starts its Vivāh Kānd, its Book of Marriage, by reminding its followers the importance of truth in the System it proposes.

We know very well that it’s always immensely troublesome to the non followers of Ved to follow the truth in any matter.

If they could do it, why they would have not followed Ved itself?

Does Ved propose anything untrue anywhere in any Mantr of it?

Never.

Yet, either they openly refuse to follow Ved or tactfully at least.

They refuse to follow Ved, not because Ved is untrue.

They refuse to follow Ved, because Ved follows nothing but truth and truth only.

They can’t afford truth.

Their system of life is profoundly full of untruths.

Every system of life wherever it differs/deviates from Ved, is untrue there, either knowingly or unknowingly.

Whatever maybe the case, ultimately in both the cases, it’s always dangerous to follow it.

Sooner or later, the truth is always disclosed.

It can’t be hidden forever.

It is one of the fundamentals of Our System, running through infinite creations, that anything true, cannot be hidden forever.

It is bound to be exposed sooner or later.

Marriage is a serious affair.

It should never be based on anything untrue whatsoever.

There are so many persons, who don’t follow Ved, that suggest either this way or that way, not to be true in marriage activities, if something is harmful.

They suggest to hide that thing.

Ved does never approve of such suicidal action.

After marriage when it would be disclosed it may break the marriage even causing your daughter immensely troublesome circumstances.

The circumstances maybe suicidal even.

Consequently, never listen to the persons who suggest such impractical policies.

It’s not the matter of life and death for their own daughter.

But it is the matter of life and death for your own daughter

Can you ever even think of  risking your daughter’s life/happiness?

If yes, why are you marrying your daughter/sister at all?

Only to get rid of her?

Never act on the suggestion(s) of your wife/wives in this matter.

If she is the mother of your daughter/sister, that’s what she does want in her blind love for her daughter.

A mother is always blind in her love for her children.

That’s how a mother is made by Us.

The children need it very much for their own very existence.

But it does not mean you must also be as blind in love as the mother is.

It does not make any difference whatsoever whether you are the father or brother of the potential bride.

Nevertheless, you have altogether different responsibilities from that of a mother.

You can’t afford to be as blind in love, as the mother is, and if not, she can be.

She is made for the purpose.

Are you also made for the same purpose?

The persons, who answer this question in the affirmative, are excused to do whatever they want to do.

Ved does not perceive them as men.

Even if they want to be perceived as men, Ved refuses bluntly to oblige them.

Vedic System of life expressly differentiates between a man and a woman.

It is never afraid of any nescience, any Avidyā, whatsoever it maybe.

It maybe Western Culture, it maybe the so called Islam that is Pseudo Islam actually, invented by Yazīd malåūn, Årab Burdāfaroshs and the then Mullahs and Maulavīs who served  Yazīd malåūn, and Årab Burdāfaroshs in developing Pseudo Islam.

It maybe atheism even.

Whatsoever the nescience maybe, Hinduism/Ved is never afraid of it.

It has already announced valiantly:

Vidyām chāvidyām ch’ yastdvédobhayagvong sah, avidyayā mr’tyum tīrtvā vidyayāmr’tamashnuté.’

Science and nescience who knows both simultaneously, by nescience crossing death, by science attains Eternity.’

Ved: 2 Yajurvéd: 40| 14

Ved differentiates between man and woman.

Of course, it does not differentiate in their fundamental human rights.

It differentiates in their physical differences, none can deny ever.

Owing to their physical differences therefore, Hinduism/Ved proposes them two different fields of actions.

Never imitate irrationally the non Hindus foolishly.

They are a dying culture now, dying fastest.

Hinduism/Ved is the culture now replacing their dying culture fastest whether they like it or not.

In not very far future, you have to lead the entire humankind once more forever, if you follow Us unconditional.

It is not the everfirst you have to do it.

Our followers have always done it physically, even if they widely differed in their names.

‘By truth, the Earth is balanced’ ‘Satyénottabhitā bhūmih’ does also mean that if you scrutinize earth/land and women, you find they have so many things common in them.

The Earth does not exist itself.

Its existence depends on the sun.

The entire solar system depends on sun for its existence including the Earth itself.

No doubt, the Earth/land gives life to agriculture, plants and trees on it, and it bears the same too.

But if the Sun explodes and/or dies, the entire solar system including the Earth dies too with the entire life on it whether planetary, animal or human.

The Earth alone, without Sun, cannot give and/or support any life at all.

On the contrary, even the existence of entire solar system, including Earth, depends on the existence of the Sun itself.

The importance of a man and a woman in a family is also somewhat similar to the existence of a Sun and an Earth in a solar system.

A woman is necessary to give and support life in a family, but she can’t do it alone.

She needs a man too for it.

Doubtlessly, the females are made in abundance by Us in Our entire infinite creations, but they are Brahmā only, not Vishñu, all pervading.

Every Param Purush Ummil Åālmīn kañ, molecule, has a different Ummil Åālmīn, but similar Param Purush.

Similarly, every planet has a different land in a solar system, yet the similar Sun.

If the Sun is different, the entire solar system is bound to be a different solar system from the first.

A solar system is recognized not by an Earth there, not by a planet there, however important the Earth or the planets may be.

There are solar systems in the galaxies that make creations as a whole, not terrestrial systems, nor planetary systems.

No terrestrial system or no planetary system can exist without a Sun.

Consequently, it’s more than evident that all the glamorization of Earth that it gives and bears life is of course a truth, but a local truth, a conditional truth only, ‘Satý’, not an universal, unconditional, eternal truth, ‘R’t’.

In a family of a Sukr’t, in the system of life advised and proposed by Us in Ved/Hinduism, similarly, a woman usually comes into contact with the local, conditional, truth, ‘Satý’, only.

It is not necessary for her to run a family to be aware of eternal truth, R’t’ too, if there is a Sukr’t to watch this field of family operations.

3. ‘Sūryéñottabhitā dyauh.’

After reminding the importance of truth, now Ved is reminding the specific nature of the movement of Hinduism/Ved.

It is not like other remaining movements.

It is based on Sukr’ts.

Its Mission of life/existence is to establish a society of Sukr’ts, noble doers.

Even for marriage, it can never compromise with its Mission of life/existence Kr’ñvanto Vishvamāryam/ Dharmsantānam/Dharmsansthāpan.

Consequently, it immediately advances to tell that, basically, it’s a polygamist movement.

Of course, polygamy is not an indispensable necessity here, but it cannot be ruled out entirely too.

As far as the law of the land is concerned, polygamy is legally prohibited in most of the modern countries today.

In these modern countries, of course, every member of this movement, even, has to follow the law of the land.

Even if he is a sun in vigor, and the celestial system is balanced by the sun, optimum, he would never break the law of the land.

Till it is the law, he would, of course, respect and follow it.

But it does never mean that he would not put his utmost legal prudence and efforts to change the law of the land to suit the nature of his Mission of life/existence Kr’ñvanto Vishvamāryam/ Dharmsantānam/Dharmsansthāpan, using every legal step and means.

He is of course a citizen of the country and as such, he has, both, to respect and follow the law of the land, till it is the law of the land.

His duties towards his country do not necessitate him to forget his greater duties towards entire humanity.

His potential bride and her relatives must understand this fact expressly, entirely and specifically.

If he is not capable to practice polygamy physically, legally or financially, it does not mean that he would not put his extreme efforts even to be capable for it physically, legally or financially, whatsoever the case maybe.

‘By Sun, the celestial system is balanced optimum’ ‘Sūryéñottabhitā dyauh’ means a man, in his family, must never forget this eternal truth in the system of life proposed, advised, by Us.

He cannot limit himself to the local, conditional, truths only.

He is not an Earth or a planet in the family.

He is the Sun.

The entire solar system depends on him for its very life and existence.

He has to take care of himself more than the rest of the family because he has to take care of the entire family.

If he exists, his entire family is safeguarded.

His wife/wives are Earth.

His children are planets.

All of them are revolving around him.

He can’t afford to indulge in the luxuries of experimenting every this or that sentimental or emotional wave coming to him from anywhere.

His unawareness, his inattentiveness, to it would be more severe to himself and to his family members too.

He can’t afford to be as indifferent to the eternal truths as his family members can.

Doubtlessly, they also have to pay its cost, but not to the extent, the man of the family would have to.

He can’t afford to the luxuries of his sentimental or emotional outbursts as his family members can afford to indulge in from time to time.

He is the Sun of the family.

The family is his solar system, ‘dyauh’.

He has to burn himself for the existence and the welfare of the family.

His family exists only until he burns himself.

No sooner he stops burning himself, his family would have to go astray, and die ultimately.

The feminists and the immature thinkers have glamorized the role of a mother in a family too much out of proportion.

They have written poems about it.

Even their prose about it is heavily poetic.

But the life isn’t a poem only.

It’s a scientific fact you all have to face.

Consequently, never indulge in poetry of the damn fools and keep yourself alert, attentive, watchful, prepared, aware, vigilant, observant, and ready to understand and face the eternal facts of life.

Let the damn fools indulge in the luxuries of the poetry and pay its cost.

You can’t afford it.

You are the sun.

You have to support your family, your solar system.

So, burn yourself.

There isn’t another alternative if you really want to safeguard your family.

‘By Sun, the celestial system is balanced optimum’ ‘Sūryéñottabhitā dyauh’ does, moreover, mean that it’s your duty to balance your solar system, your family.

The freedom of family members in your family doesn’t mean they have a right to unbalance the family even.

Sūryéñ uttabhitā dyauh‘By Sun, the celestial system is balanced optimum’.

Never allow your family members to break the discipline of the family.

It’s more dangerous to them than even compromising with their freedom.

Freedom doesn’t mean lack of discipline.

It means responsibility and self-discipline instead.

Even no Democratic country can afford to allow its citizens to break its constitution, law and order.

How can you?

A family is a smallest political unit you have to run.

You are a Democratic political leader of the family.

You have certainly to respect the personal freedom of your family members but never forget, at the same time, by hook or crook, by creative Diplomacy, you have to safeguard the discipline of the family as well.

Your family members don’t have their personal freedom and their personal family rights only.

They have their collective responsibilities and duties to their family as well.

Never forget they can’t be allowed to ignore their collective responsibilities and duties to their family.

Being the Sun of the family, you have to balance, ‘uttabhitā,it.

Sūryéñ uttabhitā dyauh‘By Sun, the celestial system is balanced optimum’.

You can’t rule out a possibility, however, that your family members maybe irrational enough not to surrender to the discipline you impose on your family and may still fight with you for their family rights.

In their over enthusiasm of destroying the family to get rid of the Private Property the foolish communist thinkers and the cunning utmost ever selfish businesspersons have philosophized abundantly to achieve this ever imprudent ever impious goal.

Even after the drastic failure of communist political and social system everywhere, no movement has tried seriously to amend it properly, though its necessity cannot be denied if you really are grave to balance and/or establish your family optimum.

Don’t wait for the others to do it for you and/or your family.

You can’t afford it.

You are the Sun of your family.

You have to do it yourself if nobody is doing it for you.

The feminists say, ‘Women and Earth have to bear many things’.

Tell them, ‘Men and Sun have to burn themselves for their family indefinitely.’

Now, be impartial and decide yourself truthfully who is doing more and who is more essential for the family actually.

Sometimes the lady/ladies of the house don’t understand this cold and hard truth because they are cows of the darkness, ‘Tamso gāh’.

You have to marry them, because the system requires you to do so:

Imām nārīm sukr’té dadhāt

Bear this woman to the noble doer’.

Indro nirjyotishā tamso gā aduxat

The controller of organs milked the cows of darkness.’

Since the lady/ladies of the house has/have come, in this way, from darkness, they don’t understand the gravity of the fact that ‘Sūryéñ uttabhitā dyauh‘By Sun, the celestial system is balanced optimum’ perfectly optimum.

Therefore, they are naturally unable to convey the fact they themselves don’t know/don’t understand, to their children perfectly optimum.

It makes the married life/Gr’hasth Āshram more problematic than it is for the Vr’trs even.

That’s why every coward, foolish and inertia-obsessed man, this way or that way, tries to run away from the responsibilities of the system proposed by Us.

Only a ‘Sūrý’, a sun, a Dharmyoddhā, a brave man, do it with his continuous nonstop bravery, not a coward, a foolish man.

The system proposed by Us, is thoroughly scientific and mathematical.

It requires ‘dhiyah’, ‘wisdoms’ even to understand it optimum and a nonstop constant continuous research of facts: ‘Yāthātathyatah’.

You can’t even survive in this system too if you don’t attempt to complete your Mission of life/existence Kr’ñvanto Vishvamāryam/ Dharmsantānam/Dharmsansthāpan, sincerely and establish an organization dedicated to it:

Samāno mantrah samitih samānī’.

It’s the initial requirement of the system itself, proposed by us.

Never complain that your wife/wives and/or children don’t understand it and don’t help/cooperate with you.

It’s natural if you follow the system:

Imām nārīm sukr’té dadhāt

Bear this woman to the noble doer’.

Indro nirjyotishā tamso gā aduxat

The controller of organs milked the cows of darkness.’

You have to face the problem diplomatically and solve it continuously nonstop.

That’s what the Gr’hasth Āshram/the married life is.

You can’t surrender to your wife/wives and/or children ever.

You have to control them and make them to follow you:

Anuvratah pituh putro mātrā bhavatu sammanāh

jāyā patyé madhumatīm vācham vadatu shantivām.’

The son must follow the sacred mission of the father and keep the mind/heart of the mother.

The wife should speak to the husband sweetly,  in concord.’

Ved: 4 Atharvved: 3|30|2

Never forget you are the Sun in your own solar system, no one else.

Consequently, you have to control it, no one else, naturally.

The others can only help and/or cooperate with you in controlling your family.

They can’t themselves control it as successfully and as beneficially as you can do it yourself.

4. ‘R’ténādityāstishŧhanti.’

You can run away neither from the Eternal Facts, described in Ved extensively, nor from the local truth and the truths as they are found and believed in your own time.

Practically, that’s the maximum, you can do.

Of course, so many persons among you still ridicule any grave interpretations of Ved.

But they ridicule actually whatsoever religious guidance you follow.

They are not against Ved, actually.

Actually, they are against everything religious.

They are actually confused persons.

They ridicule the persons following Ved, as if they know very well it’s profound foolishness.

But if you try to discuss with them what they themselves have to offer to replace Ved, if they really find to follow Ved is, Shanno Mitrah sham varuñah shanno bhavatvaryamā, ridiculous.

They have nothing to offer to replace Ved, yet they still ridicule to follow Ved.

Why?

They themselves don’t know.

They, Shanno Mitrah sham varuñah shanno bhavatvaryamā, ridicule Ved and its followers, but they don’t know its alternative.

Yet, they think they are more prudent than the persons following Ved.

They most certainly are not.

They think they are more prudent but if you really invite them to discuss their own ideology, you may be surprised to find that they don’t have any ideology at all.

It is the real fact.

The persons who don’t have any ideology at all, ridicule the persons who have a perfectly rational and scientific ideology they can discuss thoroughly, extensively and without any hesitation and irritation at all.

So many Hindus think it’s communal to think of oneself as a Hindu.

But they don’t think it’s communal if a Musalmān thinks himself as a Musalmān, a Christian thinks himself as a Christian, a Jew thinks himself as a Jew, a Persian thinks himself as a Persian and an atheist thinks himself as an atheist.

He does not realize it’s double standard, actually, he/she is practicing about Hindus.

He/she goes on to practice it without never realizing even what he/she is practicing is entirely unjust, irrational and inhumane even.

It was started by anti Hindus, and even the so called Hindus are practicing it now, without any realization whatsoever what they are doing.

They ridicule Hindus while actually they are themselves the persons who should be ridiculed for their profound stupidity.

If you don’t want to be recognized as a Hindu, no one is compelling you to do so.

You just go ahead and declare so.

But you can’t do even that.

Because you are actually a timid and a coward person.

You are afraid of knowing what you are actually.

You don’t want to acknowledge the fact that you are actually yourself ridiculous, timid and coward.

Hindus are most certainly Not.

How is a person ridiculous if he/she has and practices a rational, scientific and mathematical ideology?

And how are you even to be respected if you neither have nor practice any such thing?

Aren’t you yourself a person who deserves to be ridiculed, instead of ridiculing Hindus?

If you don’t want to be addressed as a Hindu, be brave and declare so.

If you want to remain only an Indian, an atheist or whatsoever you think yourself, it is not a problem for the Hindus.

You can do whatsoever you damn please.

But you can’t be allowed to deceive and to cheat the others.

It’s not only an immoral act; it’s a crime as well.

If you are not even aware of it, think how prudent you are yourself, ridiculing Hindus.

Do you really want to continue it?

You like it or not, until and unless you don’t declare you are not a Hindu, you are legally a Hindu, and you’d be recognized as a Hindu for all practical and legal purposes.

As far as the social, legal and practical purposes are, the Hindus are concerned with you if you don’t declare that you are not a Hindu.

The question is why should the Hindus allow you to deceive, to cheat them, that you are a Hindu, if you are actually not a Hindu?

It is dangerous to them.

If there be a communal riot, and you can’t guarantee that there would never be one, the Hindus would believe that you are one of them while you are certainly not.

As such, you are not bound to defend Hindus against their communal enemies whosoever they may be.

While the Hindus would defend you and your interests.

Why should you be allowed this privilege by the persons you ridicule so shamelessly?

Why shouldn’t you be thrown to the wolves in the same way you throw the Hindus whenever you ridicule them?

Why should the Hindus allow you to have the benefits of being a Hindu when it’s beneficial to you, and the benefits of being an anti Hindu whenever it is beneficial to you?

Why Hindus should suffer in both the cases?

Why should you be allowed to get benefits in both the cases?

If you are not a Hindu, you would never be allowed to get its benefits.

And if you are a Hindu, you can’t be allowed to ridicule the other Hindus in your profound stupidity.

If you are a secular Hindu and hate the other Hindus because they are not secular in your profound stupid eyes, you are invited respectfully to discuss your points and to prove you are right.

You can do it.

But if instead of discussing your points if you stupidly ridicule the actually secular, rational, scientific and mathematical Hindus you’d be ridiculed too.

If instead of behaving as a prudent person, you choose to behave irresponsibly, why should a responsible person follow you?

Why shouldn’t he/she ridicule you in the same way and bring your profound stupidity in front of the other reasonable responsible persons?

‘By Eternal Truth Ādityās stand’ ‘R’ténādityāstishŧhanti’ means never act as if you are a planet or Earth.

You are certainly NOT.

You are an Āditý, a Sun.

A sun has to take care of the entire planets including the Earth too.

You can’t afford to be as negligent to the eternal truth, ‘R’t’ as your other family members can.

To the most, they would harm only themselves thus.

But if you do the same mistake you would harm the entire family.

Your position is more important than your rest of the family members.

You are bound to follow eternal truth.

You are bound to be brave and vigorous so that you can safeguard and protect your family members.

You are bound to burn yourself as the suns do for the life and existence of their solar system.

‘By Eternal Truth Ādityās stand’ ‘R’ténādityāstishŧhanti’.

5. ‘Divi somo adhi shritah’.

You have to allow polygamy as a potential possibility at least if you really follow the system We propose.

Again, you can’t be allowed to have and eat your cake simultaneously.

If you live in a country that does not allow polygamy legally for your religious group, while it does allow the same for another religious group living in the same country, you must fight against such a shameless double standard in legal practice even.

If you think, polygamy is itself not correct you must revolt against the society that is allowed legally to practice it too.

However, you must never fight against the society itself enjoying such privileged legal rights.

The shameless corrupt politicians do such legal discriminations to keep different societies in their country  fighting with each other and rule them.

They practically believe in the dangerous policy of ‘Divide and rule’, even if they don’t admit it in so many words.

Such imprudent policies are not only dangerous to the societies that are not in the position to avail of such discriminatory legal rights; these are far more dangerous to the societies that are allowed to enjoy such legal rights.

The societies having less rights, always hate the societies having more rights, whether one likes it or not.

In India, it has resulted in profound hatred against Musalmīn.

Hindus inadvertently hate Musalmīn even if they are not aware of any such hatred they are nourishing against Musalmīn in their heart unknowingly.

The unscrupulous politicians understand it and deliberately nurse it so that they keep divided both the societies and rule them.

Musalmān women find other women have not to bear other women in their marital status as their co wives as they have to.

They become jealous of such women enjoying exclusive marital bliss.

And in their jealousy they go to the extent to attract their Hindu husband.

It happens more if the Musalmān husband, practicing polygamy, doesn’t do justice among his Musalmān wives.

The Musalmān wives, who don’t get justice from their Musalmān husband, find a Hindu lover for themselves both to punish their Musalmān husband and keep themselves happy.

In India, it’s more drastic as most of the Musalmīn here are either uneducated or under educated.

Why a Musalmān woman, if she were intelligent, prudent and smart, would opt for an uneducated/under educated  Musalmān husband while an equally intelligent, prudent and smart, highly educated Hindu husband/lover is available to her without any extra effort?

It brings hatred among loser Musalmīn against gaining Hindus.

The shrewd politicians again get benefits of ‘Divide and rule‘ policy, practically, even if they never accept it in so many words.

 Atharv Ved: Kaand 14| Sookt 1| Mantr 2

——————————————————————————

More Commentary on Ved from DSM Satyarthi:

1. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

2. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 1| Mantr 2

3. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 1| Mantr 3

4. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 5| Mantr 3

5. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 7| Mantr 5

6. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 7| Mantr 8

4. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 1

5. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 2

6. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 3

7. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 4

8. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 5

9. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 6

10. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 7

11. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 8

12.R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 9

13. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 33| Mantr 1

14. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 33| Mantr 2

14. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 58| Mantr 6

15. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 164| Mantr 20

16. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 164| Mantr 46

17. R’gved: Mandal 2| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

18 R’gved: Mandal 3| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

19. R’gved: Mandal 3| Sookt 6| Mantr 2

20. R’gved: Mandal 4| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

21. R’gved: Mandal 4| Sookt 26| Mantr 2

22. R’gved: Mandal 5| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

23. R’gved: Mandal 6| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

24. R’gved: Mandal 7| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

25. R’gved: Mandal 8| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

26. R’gved: Mandal 9| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

27. R’gved: Mandal 9| Sookt 63| Mantr 4-5

28. R’gved: Mandal 10| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

29. R’gved: Mandal 10| Sookt 85| Mantr 42

30. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 1| Mantr 1

31. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 1| Mantr 2

32. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 1| Mantr 3

33. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 1| Mantr 4

34. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 11| Mantr 1

35. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 13| Mantr 4

36. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 23| Mantr 3

37. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 31| Mantr 18

38. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 40| Mantr2

39. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 40| Mantr8

40. Saamved: Mantr 1

41. Sāmved: Mantr 115

42. Sāmved: Mantr 641: Mahānāmnyārchik| 1

43. Sāmved: Mantr 650: Mahānāmnyārchik| 10

44. Sāmved: Mantr 651: Uttarārchik

45. Atharv Ved: Kaand 1| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

46.  Atharv Ved: Kānd 3| Sookt 30| Mantr 3

47. Atharv Ved: Kānd 3| Sookt 30| Mantr 4

48. Atharv Ved: Kānd 3| Sookt 30| Mantr 6

49. Atharv Ved: Kānd 4| Sookt 4| Mantr 6

50. Atharv Ved: Kānd 4| Sookt 4| Mantr 7

51. Atharv Ved: Kānd 4| Sookt 4| Mantr 8

52. Atharv Ved: Kaand 4| Sookt 13| Mantr 1

53. Atharv Ved: Kaand 8| Sookt 1| Mantr 6

54. Atharv Ved: Kaand 8| Sookt 4| Mantr 22

55. Atharv Ved: Kaand 14| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

56. Atharv Ved: Kaand 14| Sookt 1| Mantr 2

57. Atharv Ved: Kaand 14| Sookt 1| Mantr 3

58. Atharv Ved: Kaand 14| Sookt 1| Mantr 4

59.  Atharv Ved: Kaand 14| Sookt 1| Mantr 22

60.Atharv Ved: Kaand 14| Sookt 2| Mantr 25

Why can’t we love each other?: Innallāh yuħibbul muttaqīn

Why can’t we love each other?:

Innallāh yuħibbul muttaqīn

Indeed, Allah loves the persons who control

themselves.

̶Al Qur’ān Al Karīm: 9 At-Tawbah: 4

DSM Satyarthi

I’m sorry to say that I don’t agree with the highly educated persons who claim that Al Qur’ān Al Karīm and Islam itself is dangerous to humankind.

I respect their concern for humankind.

As one of the humankind I also want to join them to protect myself, if even not the others.

But the fact is, the more I peruse Ved, Bible and Al Qur’ān Al Karīm, the more I find they don’t differ in their basic teachings.

The reason my such friends find Al Qur’ān Al Karīm and Islam itself is dangerous to humankind, is that they don’t study Al Qur’ān Al Karīm in its original Arabic.

They accept the explanations of Al Qur’ān Al Karīm its misinterpreters advance.

Please, never do it.

It’s the ever worst mistake the critics of Islam are repeating ever since Islam has come into existence.

I propose them to study Al Qur’ān Al Karīm in its original Arabic, thoroughly rejecting its explanations from its communal interpreters.

I’m sure and immensely confident you’ll find, neither Al Qur’ān Al Karīm nor Islam itself, is as dangerous to humankind as my such friends think.

Yes, the Arabs, the Iranians and so many of the  Musalmīn even, are using both Al Qur’ān Al Karīm and Islam today for spreading their own imperialism.

But that’s what I’ve already written in my now famous essay:

Most Present day Muslims don’t do what Huzoor(SAW) did’.

I request you to go through it once more.

How Al Qur’ān Al Karīm and Islam itself is responsible for what its so called followers do?

Al Qur’ān Al Karīm says:

Innallāh yuħibbul muttaqīn.’

‘Indeed, Allah loves the persons who control themselves.’

̶ Al Qur’ān Al Karīm: 9 At-Tawbah: 4

Do the terrorists control themselves?

Are they really muttaqīn?

Do the imperialists control themselves?

Are the imperialists really muttaqīn?

I don’t think so.

My dear friends, my very dear friends, Islam is not in what the terrorists, the imperialists and even the Musalmīn do.

The Musalmīn have to follow Islam.

Islam doesn’t have to follow Musalmīn.

Please be rational.

Don’t resort to irrationalism only because the terrorists, the imperialists and even the Musalmīn do so.

Islam itself tells what it is really.

I’ve already written an essay on it too:

Islam according to Qur’an and Maulana Maududi rahamatullh alaihi’.

One more reference to the persons who are really interested:

Islam according to Ved.’

I hope my such friends now will try to act more responsibly.

Please stop throwing mud on each other.

Why can’t we love each other instead, my dear friends?

Why there are differences among us?

How to establish ‘Rām Rājý’/

Ħukūmat-e-Ilāhī/The Kingdom of God

 —————————————————————————

More on Islam from DSM Satyarthi:

1. Bal huv qur’anum majeedun fe LAUHIM MAHFOOZIN

2. Innahu laquranun kareemun Fee kitabin maknoonin

3. ‘Hudallilmuttaqeen’: ‘Guidance for controllers of organs’: 2 Al Baqarah: 2

4. ‘Alaa qalbik litakoon minal-munzireen’ ‘upon your heart one of who to warn’

5. Muslimahs! Come to India. I recommend Hindu lovers for all the Muslimahs.: Khadeejah Muhammad

6. Islam according to Qur’an and Maulana Maududi rahamatullh alaihi

7. A Moment of grave thinking for the entire sophisticated Muslim Community

8. ‘SET THIS WOMAN for WELL DOER’: ‘Imaam naareem Sukr’te dadhaat’

9. ‘V’ innahu fe UMMALKITAABI ladainaa la’liyyun hakeemun’: 43/4

10. Most Present day Muslms don’t do what Huzoor(SAW) did:

11. The Muslim beauties are wooing Hindu men FASTEST

12. ‘What really matters in the sight of God’: Maulana: Maududi

13. Why did Islam face a counter revolution at Karbala?

14. Why there are differences among us?

15. No differences Please!

16. Llā yamassuhu illā almutahharūn

———————————————————————————

More from DSM Satyarthi:

1.  Commentary on Ved

2. More On Hinduism

3. On Islam

4. On History

5. Science Fiction

6.  Creative Adult Sex in English from Durgesh

7. Durgesh in Hindi/Urdu

—————————————————————–

More on Hinduism from DSM Satyarthi:

1. ‘Bhoorbhuvah svah!’ ‘The Existence! The Consciousness! The Bliss!’

2.‘Devasy’ pashy’ kaavyam, n’ mamaar, n’ jeeryati.’

3. Hinduism shines

4.Ved is the eternal law book having infinite knowledge in it for human beings

5. ‘According to facts’: ‘Yaathaatathyatah’

6. ‘SET THIS WOMAN for WELL DOER’: ‘Imaam naareem Sukr’te dadhaat’

7. The Evernew Hinduism: Yaathaatathyatah: Ved 2|40|8

8. ‘How to cross death’: ‘Tamev viditvaati mr’tyumeti’: Ved2Yajurved|31|18

9. According to Hinduism: We must be polite, not coward

10.Ye yathaa maam prapadyante taanstathaiv bhajaamyaham: Lord Kr’shn

—————————————————————————————————

Commentary on Ved from DSM Satyarthi:

1. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

2. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 1| Mantr 2

3. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 5| Mantr 3

4. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 5| Mantr 3

5. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 7| Mantr 5

6. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 7| Mantr 8

4. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 1

5. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 2

6. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 3

7. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 4

8. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 5

9. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 6

10. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 7

11. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 8

12.R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 9

13. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 58| Mantr 6

14. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 164| Mantr 20

15. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 164| Mantr 46

16. R’gved: Mandal 2| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

17 R’gved: Mandal 3| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

18. R’gved: Mandal 3| Sookt 6| Mantr 2

19. R’gved: Mandal 4| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

20. R’gved: Mandal 5| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

21. R’gved: Mandal 6| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

22. R’gved: Mandal 7| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

23. R’gved: Mandal 8| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

24. R’gved: Mandal 9| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

25. R’gved: Mandal 9| Sookt 63| Mantr 4-5

26. R’gved: Mandal 10| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

27. R’gved: Mandal 10| Sookt 85| Mantr 42

28. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 1| Mantr 1

29. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 1| Mantr 2

30. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 1| Mantr 3

31. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 1| Mantr 4

32. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 11| Mantr 1

33. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 13| Mantr 4

34. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 23| Mantr 3

35. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 31| Mantr 18

36. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 40| Mantr8

37. Saamved: Mantr 1

38. Sāmved: Mantr 115

39. Sāmved: Mantr 641: Mahānāmnyārchik| 1

40. Sāmved: Mantr 650: Mahānāmnyārchik| 10

41. Sāmved: Mantr 651: Uttarārchik

42. Atharv Ved: Kaand 1| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

43.  Atharv Ved: Kānd 3| Sookt 30| Mantr 3

44. Atharv Ved: Kānd 3| Sookt 30| Mantr 4

45. Atharv Ved: Kānd 3| Sookt 30| Mantr 6

46. Atharv Ved: Kānd 4| Sookt 4| Mantr 6

47. Atharv Ved: Kānd 4| Sookt 4| Mantr 7

48. Atharv Ved: Kānd 4| Sookt 4| Mantr 8

49. Atharv Ved: Kaand 8| Sookt 1| Mantr 6

50. Atharv Ved: Kaand 8| Sookt 4| Mantr 22

51.  Atharv Ved: Kaand 14| Sookt 1| Mantr 22

52.Atharv Ved: Kaand 14| Sookt 2| Mantr 25