Kānd 14 Vivāh Kānd:
Satyénottabhitā bhūmih sūryéñottabhitā dyauh,
R’ténādityāstishŧhanti divi somo adhi shritah.
1By truth, the Earth is balanced2. By Sun, the celestial system is balanced optimum3. By Eternal Truth Ādityās stand4. In the celestial system, Som is set rightfully5.
1.R’shikā: Sūryā Sāvitrī
Dévtā/ Divine Subject: Ātmā, Soul
2. ‘Satyénottabhitā bhūmih’.
‘Uttabhitā’ is feminine gender of ‘Ut-stabh’.
According to Āchārý Sāyañ, as every Western scholar of Ved claims to follow Āchārý Sāyañ, whether he really does follow Āchārý Sāyañ or not, W. D. Whitney has also suggested the same, in his famous translation of Atharv Ved.
It does not mean, however, that this Commentary of Ved accepts the authority of W. D. Whitney, Ralph Thomas Hotchkin Griffith or Āchārý Sāyañ.
This Commentary of Ved accepts the authority of Ved, Shākhā Granths, Brāhmañ Granths, Ārañyaks, Upanishads, Nighanŧu, Nirukt and Vedic Sanskr’t Grammar only.
It can always be proved profoundly that the translations of W. D. Whitney, Āchārý Sāyañ, and other Western scholars, of Ved, do materially differ from Ved, Shākhā Granths, Brāhmañ Granths, Ārañyaks, Upanishads, Nighanŧu, Nirukt and Vedic Sanskr’t Grammar.
The translations of W. D. Whitney, Āchārý Sāyañ, and other Western scholars, of Ved, are either contradictory to Ved, Shākhā Granths, Brāhmañ Granths, Ārañyaks, Upanishads, Nighanŧu, Nirukt and Vedic Sanskr’t Grammar, or immensely poor translations of Ved, even if they follow Ved, Shākhā Granths, Brāhmañ Granths, Ārañyaks, Upanishads, Nighanŧu, Nirukt and Vedic Sanskr’t Grammar, anywhere.
The Western scholars of Ved and their so-called Indian advocates claim the Western translations of Ved depict the true form of Ved as it was being practiced by Hindus initially.
Of course, their such claims are profoundly wrong and self contradictory.
The Commentary of Ved by Āchārý Sāyañ cannot be written before Āchārý Sāyañ, himself.
It is obvious from the request of King of Vijay Nagar Empire, to Āchārý Mādhav, that no Commentary of Ved was found those days, that explained the logic of Ved as it was used in Yāgnik rituals.
Āchārý Mādhav, the elder brother of Āchārý Sāyañ, refused immediately to grant the request of King of Vijay Nagar Empire, declaring it an unnecessary effort and not beneficial to Hindus too.
The King of Vijay Nagar Empire could not understand it.
He was only a king, not a scholar of Ved or Vedic Sanskr’t.
He requested to Āchārý Sāyañ, the younger brother of Āchārý Mādhav, to do the task seeking the guidance of his elder brother, Āchārý Mādhav, whenever, whatsoever and wherever it was available to him, as he was his real younger brother.
‘Satyénottabhitā bhūmih’ ‘By truth, the Earth is balanced’ means that even in marriage, never deviate from truth as it is told in Ved.
There are so many persons, especially in these days of rotten Western Culture, who ridicule the persons following truth in marriage activities.
They imply that it isn’t necessary anywhere to practice truth if it is not beneficial to the practitioners.
Even if it is beneficial to them in the long run, the Westerners and their Eastern followers profoundly and shamelessly disapprove of following it.
They treat such persons backward and either ridicule them or at least treat them sympathetically, as if they are doing any sin following the truth.
Ved rejects this dangerous policy ab initio.
It starts its Vivāh Kānd, its Book of Marriage, by reminding its followers the importance of truth in the System it proposes.
We know very well that it’s always immensely troublesome to the non followers of Ved to follow the truth in any matter.
If they could do it, why they would have not followed Ved itself?
Does Ved propose anything untrue anywhere in any Mantr of it?
Yet, either they openly refuse to follow Ved or tactfully at least.
They refuse to follow Ved, not because Ved is untrue.
They refuse to follow Ved, because Ved follows nothing but truth and truth only.
They can’t afford truth.
Their system of life is profoundly full of untruths.
Every system of life wherever it differs/deviates from Ved, is untrue there, either knowingly or unknowingly.
Whatever maybe the case, ultimately in both the cases, it’s always dangerous to follow it.
Sooner or later, the truth is always disclosed.
It can’t be hidden forever.
It is one of the fundamentals of Our System, running through infinite creations, that anything true, cannot be hidden forever.
It is bound to be exposed sooner or later.
Marriage is a serious affair.
It should never be based on anything untrue whatsoever.
There are so many persons, who don’t follow Ved, that suggest either this way or that way, not to be true in marriage activities, if something is harmful.
They suggest to hide that thing.
Ved does never approve of such suicidal action.
After marriage when it would be disclosed it may break the marriage even causing your daughter immensely troublesome circumstances.
The circumstances maybe suicidal even.
Consequently, never listen to the persons who suggest such impractical policies.
It’s not the matter of life and death for their own daughter.
But it is the matter of life and death for your own daughter
Can you ever even think of risking your daughter’s life/happiness?
If yes, why are you marrying your daughter/sister at all?
Only to get rid of her?
Never act on the suggestion(s) of your wife/wives in this matter.
If she is the mother of your daughter/sister, that’s what she does want in her blind love for her daughter.
A mother is always blind in her love for her children.
That’s how a mother is made by Us.
The children need it very much for their own very existence.
But it does not mean you must also be as blind in love as the mother is.
It does not make any difference whatsoever whether you are the father or brother of the potential bride.
Nevertheless, you have altogether different responsibilities from that of a mother.
You can’t afford to be as blind in love, as the mother is, and if not, she can be.
She is made for the purpose.
Are you also made for the same purpose?
The persons, who answer this question in the affirmative, are excused to do whatever they want to do.
Ved does not perceive them as men.
Even if they want to be perceived as men, Ved refuses bluntly to oblige them.
Vedic System of life expressly differentiates between a man and a woman.
It is never afraid of any nescience, any Avidyā, whatsoever it maybe.
It maybe Western Culture, it maybe the so called Islam that is Pseudo Islam actually, invented by Yazīd malåūn, Årab Burdāfaroshs and the then Mullahs and Maulavīs who served Yazīd malåūn, and Årab Burdāfaroshs in developing Pseudo Islam.
It maybe atheism even.
Whatsoever the nescience maybe, Hinduism/Ved is never afraid of it.
It has already announced valiantly:
‘Vidyām chāvidyām ch’ yastdvédobhayagvong sah, avidyayā mr’tyum tīrtvā vidyayāmr’tamashnuté.’
‘Science and nescience who knows both simultaneously, by nescience crossing death, by science attains Eternity.’
— Ved: 2 Yajurvéd: 40| 14
Ved differentiates between man and woman.
Of course, it does not differentiate in their fundamental human rights.
It differentiates in their physical differences, none can deny ever.
Owing to their physical differences therefore, Hinduism/Ved proposes them two different fields of actions.
Never imitate irrationally the non Hindus foolishly.
They are a dying culture now, dying fastest.
Hinduism/Ved is the culture now replacing their dying culture fastest whether they like it or not.
In not very far future, you have to lead the entire humankind once more forever, if you follow Us unconditional.
It is not the everfirst you have to do it.
Our followers have always done it physically, even if they widely differed in their names.
‘By truth, the Earth is balanced’ ‘Satyénottabhitā bhūmih’ does also mean that if you scrutinize earth/land and women, you find they have so many things common in them.
The Earth does not exist itself.
Its existence depends on the sun.
The entire solar system depends on sun for its existence including the Earth itself.
No doubt, the Earth/land gives life to agriculture, plants and trees on it, and it bears the same too.
But if the Sun explodes and/or dies, the entire solar system including the Earth dies too with the entire life on it whether planetary, animal or human.
The Earth alone, without Sun, cannot give and/or support any life at all.
On the contrary, even the existence of entire solar system, including Earth, depends on the existence of the Sun itself.
The importance of a man and a woman in a family is also somewhat similar to the existence of a Sun and an Earth in a solar system.
A woman is necessary to give and support life in a family, but she can’t do it alone.
She needs a man too for it.
Doubtlessly, the females are made in abundance by Us in Our entire infinite creations, but they are Brahmā only, not Vishñu, all pervading.
Every Param Purush Ummil Åālmīn kañ, molecule, has a different Ummil Åālmīn, but similar Param Purush.
Similarly, every planet has a different land in a solar system, yet the similar Sun.
If the Sun is different, the entire solar system is bound to be a different solar system from the first.
A solar system is recognized not by an Earth there, not by a planet there, however important the Earth or the planets may be.
There are solar systems in the galaxies that make creations as a whole, not terrestrial systems, nor planetary systems.
No terrestrial system or no planetary system can exist without a Sun.
Consequently, it’s more than evident that all the glamorization of Earth that it gives and bears life is of course a truth, but a local truth, a conditional truth only, ‘Satý’, not an universal, unconditional, eternal truth, ‘R’t’.
In a family of a Sukr’t, in the system of life advised and proposed by Us in Ved/Hinduism, similarly, a woman usually comes into contact with the local, conditional, truth, ‘Satý’, only.
It is not necessary for her to run a family to be aware of eternal truth, R’t’ too, if there is a Sukr’t to watch this field of family operations.
3. ‘Sūryéñottabhitā dyauh.’
After reminding the importance of truth, now Ved is reminding the specific nature of the movement of Hinduism/Ved.
It is not like other remaining movements.
It is based on Sukr’ts.
Its Mission of life/existence is to establish a society of Sukr’ts, noble doers.
Even for marriage, it can never compromise with its Mission of life/existence Kr’ñvanto Vishvamāryam/ Dharmsantānam/Dharmsansthāpan.
Consequently, it immediately advances to tell that, basically, it’s a polygamist movement.
Of course, polygamy is not an indispensable necessity here, but it cannot be ruled out entirely too.
As far as the law of the land is concerned, polygamy is legally prohibited in most of the modern countries today.
In these modern countries, of course, every member of this movement, even, has to follow the law of the land.
Even if he is a sun in vigor, and the celestial system is balanced by the sun, optimum, he would never break the law of the land.
Till it is the law, he would, of course, respect and follow it.
But it does never mean that he would not put his utmost legal prudence and efforts to change the law of the land to suit the nature of his Mission of life/existence Kr’ñvanto Vishvamāryam/ Dharmsantānam/Dharmsansthāpan, using every legal step and means.
He is of course a citizen of the country and as such, he has, both, to respect and follow the law of the land, till it is the law of the land.
His duties towards his country do not necessitate him to forget his greater duties towards entire humanity.
His potential bride and her relatives must understand this fact expressly, entirely and specifically.
If he is not capable to practice polygamy physically, legally or financially, it does not mean that he would not put his extreme efforts even to be capable for it physically, legally or financially, whatsoever the case maybe.
‘By Sun, the celestial system is balanced optimum’ ‘Sūryéñottabhitā dyauh’ means a man, in his family, must never forget this eternal truth in the system of life proposed, advised, by Us.
He cannot limit himself to the local, conditional, truths only.
He is not an Earth or a planet in the family.
He is the Sun.
The entire solar system depends on him for its very life and existence.
He has to take care of himself more than the rest of the family because he has to take care of the entire family.
If he exists, his entire family is safeguarded.
His wife/wives are Earth.
His children are planets.
All of them are revolving around him.
He can’t afford to indulge in the luxuries of experimenting every this or that sentimental or emotional wave coming to him from anywhere.
His unawareness, his inattentiveness, to it would be more severe to himself and to his family members too.
He can’t afford to be as indifferent to the eternal truths as his family members can.
Doubtlessly, they also have to pay its cost, but not to the extent, the man of the family would have to.
He can’t afford to the luxuries of his sentimental or emotional outbursts as his family members can afford to indulge in from time to time.
He is the Sun of the family.
The family is his solar system, ‘dyauh’.
He has to burn himself for the existence and the welfare of the family.
His family exists only until he burns himself.
No sooner he stops burning himself, his family would have to go astray, and die ultimately.
The feminists and the immature thinkers have glamorized the role of a mother in a family too much out of proportion.
They have written poems about it.
Even their prose about it is heavily poetic.
But the life isn’t a poem only.
It’s a scientific fact you all have to face.
Consequently, never indulge in poetry of the damn fools and keep yourself alert, attentive, watchful, prepared, aware, vigilant, observant, and ready to understand and face the eternal facts of life.
Let the damn fools indulge in the luxuries of the poetry and pay its cost.
You can’t afford it.
You are the sun.
You have to support your family, your solar system.
So, burn yourself.
There isn’t another alternative if you really want to safeguard your family.
‘By Sun, the celestial system is balanced optimum’ ‘Sūryéñottabhitā dyauh’ does, moreover, mean that it’s your duty to balance your solar system, your family.
The freedom of family members in your family doesn’t mean they have a right to unbalance the family even.
‘Sūryéñ uttabhitā dyauh’ ‘By Sun, the celestial system is balanced optimum’.
Never allow your family members to break the discipline of the family.
It’s more dangerous to them than even compromising with their freedom.
Freedom doesn’t mean lack of discipline.
It means responsibility and self-discipline instead.
Even no Democratic country can afford to allow its citizens to break its constitution, law and order.
How can you?
A family is a smallest political unit you have to run.
You are a Democratic political leader of the family.
You have certainly to respect the personal freedom of your family members but never forget, at the same time, by hook or crook, by creative Diplomacy, you have to safeguard the discipline of the family as well.
Your family members don’t have their personal freedom and their personal family rights only.
They have their collective responsibilities and duties to their family as well.
Never forget they can’t be allowed to ignore their collective responsibilities and duties to their family.
Being the Sun of the family, you have to balance, ‘uttabhitā’,it.
‘Sūryéñ uttabhitā dyauh’ ‘By Sun, the celestial system is balanced optimum’.
You can’t rule out a possibility, however, that your family members maybe irrational enough not to surrender to the discipline you impose on your family and may still fight with you for their family rights.
In their over enthusiasm of destroying the family to get rid of the Private Property the foolish communist thinkers and the cunning utmost ever selfish businesspersons have philosophized abundantly to achieve this ever imprudent ever impious goal.
Even after the drastic failure of communist political and social system everywhere, no movement has tried seriously to amend it properly, though its necessity cannot be denied if you really are grave to balance and/or establish your family optimum.
Don’t wait for the others to do it for you and/or your family.
You can’t afford it.
You are the Sun of your family.
You have to do it yourself if nobody is doing it for you.
The feminists say, ‘Women and Earth have to bear many things’.
Tell them, ‘Men and Sun have to burn themselves for their family indefinitely.’
Now, be impartial and decide yourself truthfully who is doing more and who is more essential for the family actually.
Sometimes the lady/ladies of the house don’t understand this cold and hard truth because they are cows of the darkness, ‘Tamso gāh’.
You have to marry them, because the system requires you to do so:
‘Imām nārīm sukr’té dadhāt’
‘Bear this woman to the noble doer’.
‘Indro nirjyotishā tamso gā aduxat’
‘The controller of organs milked the cows of darkness.’
Since the lady/ladies of the house has/have come, in this way, from darkness, they don’t understand the gravity of the fact that ‘‘Sūryéñ uttabhitā dyauh’ ‘By Sun, the celestial system is balanced optimum’ perfectly optimum.
Therefore, they are naturally unable to convey the fact they themselves don’t know/don’t understand, to their children perfectly optimum.
It makes the married life/Gr’hasth Āshram more problematic than it is for the Vr’trs even.
That’s why every coward, foolish and inertia-obsessed man, this way or that way, tries to run away from the responsibilities of the system proposed by Us.
Only a ‘Sūrý’, a sun, a Dharmyoddhā, a brave man, do it with his continuous nonstop bravery, not a coward, a foolish man.
The system proposed by Us, is thoroughly scientific and mathematical.
It requires ‘dhiyah’, ‘wisdoms’ even to understand it optimum and a nonstop constant continuous research of facts: ‘Yāthātathyatah’.
You can’t even survive in this system too if you don’t attempt to complete your Mission of life/existence Kr’ñvanto Vishvamāryam/ Dharmsantānam/Dharmsansthāpan, sincerely and establish an organization dedicated to it:
‘Samāno mantrah samitih samānī’.
It’s the initial requirement of the system itself, proposed by us.
Never complain that your wife/wives and/or children don’t understand it and don’t help/cooperate with you.
It’s natural if you follow the system:
‘Imām nārīm sukr’té dadhāt’
‘Bear this woman to the noble doer’.
‘Indro nirjyotishā tamso gā aduxat’
‘The controller of organs milked the cows of darkness.’
You have to face the problem diplomatically and solve it continuously nonstop.
That’s what the Gr’hasth Āshram/the married life is.
You can’t surrender to your wife/wives and/or children ever.
You have to control them and make them to follow you:
‘Anuvratah pituh putro mātrā bhavatu sammanāh
jāyā patyé madhumatīm vācham vadatu shantivām.’
‘The son must follow the sacred mission of the father and keep the mind/heart of the mother.
The wife should speak to the husband sweetly, in concord.’
−Ved: 4 Atharvved: 3|30|2
Never forget you are the Sun in your own solar system, no one else.
Consequently, you have to control it, no one else, naturally.
The others can only help and/or cooperate with you in controlling your family.
They can’t themselves control it as successfully and as beneficially as you can do it yourself.
You can run away neither from the Eternal Facts, described in Ved extensively, nor from the local truth and the truths as they are found and believed in your own time.
Practically, that’s the maximum, you can do.
Of course, so many persons among you still ridicule any grave interpretations of Ved.
But they ridicule actually whatsoever religious guidance you follow.
They are not against Ved, actually.
Actually, they are against everything religious.
They are actually confused persons.
They ridicule the persons following Ved, as if they know very well it’s profound foolishness.
But if you try to discuss with them what they themselves have to offer to replace Ved, if they really find to follow Ved is, Shanno Mitrah sham varuñah shanno bhavatvaryamā, ridiculous.
They have nothing to offer to replace Ved, yet they still ridicule to follow Ved.
They themselves don’t know.
They, Shanno Mitrah sham varuñah shanno bhavatvaryamā, ridicule Ved and its followers, but they don’t know its alternative.
Yet, they think they are more prudent than the persons following Ved.
They most certainly are not.
They think they are more prudent but if you really invite them to discuss their own ideology, you may be surprised to find that they don’t have any ideology at all.
It is the real fact.
The persons who don’t have any ideology at all, ridicule the persons who have a perfectly rational and scientific ideology they can discuss thoroughly, extensively and without any hesitation and irritation at all.
So many Hindus think it’s communal to think of oneself as a Hindu.
But they don’t think it’s communal if a Musalmān thinks himself as a Musalmān, a Christian thinks himself as a Christian, a Jew thinks himself as a Jew, a Persian thinks himself as a Persian and an atheist thinks himself as an atheist.
He does not realize it’s double standard, actually, he/she is practicing about Hindus.
He/she goes on to practice it without never realizing even what he/she is practicing is entirely unjust, irrational and inhumane even.
It was started by anti Hindus, and even the so called Hindus are practicing it now, without any realization whatsoever what they are doing.
They ridicule Hindus while actually they are themselves the persons who should be ridiculed for their profound stupidity.
If you don’t want to be recognized as a Hindu, no one is compelling you to do so.
You just go ahead and declare so.
But you can’t do even that.
Because you are actually a timid and a coward person.
You are afraid of knowing what you are actually.
You don’t want to acknowledge the fact that you are actually yourself ridiculous, timid and coward.
Hindus are most certainly Not.
How is a person ridiculous if he/she has and practices a rational, scientific and mathematical ideology?
And how are you even to be respected if you neither have nor practice any such thing?
Aren’t you yourself a person who deserves to be ridiculed, instead of ridiculing Hindus?
If you don’t want to be addressed as a Hindu, be brave and declare so.
If you want to remain only an Indian, an atheist or whatsoever you think yourself, it is not a problem for the Hindus.
You can do whatsoever you damn please.
But you can’t be allowed to deceive and to cheat the others.
It’s not only an immoral act; it’s a crime as well.
If you are not even aware of it, think how prudent you are yourself, ridiculing Hindus.
Do you really want to continue it?
You like it or not, until and unless you don’t declare you are not a Hindu, you are legally a Hindu, and you’d be recognized as a Hindu for all practical and legal purposes.
As far as the social, legal and practical purposes are, the Hindus are concerned with you if you don’t declare that you are not a Hindu.
The question is why should the Hindus allow you to deceive, to cheat them, that you are a Hindu, if you are actually not a Hindu?
It is dangerous to them.
If there be a communal riot, and you can’t guarantee that there would never be one, the Hindus would believe that you are one of them while you are certainly not.
As such, you are not bound to defend Hindus against their communal enemies whosoever they may be.
While the Hindus would defend you and your interests.
Why should you be allowed this privilege by the persons you ridicule so shamelessly?
Why shouldn’t you be thrown to the wolves in the same way you throw the Hindus whenever you ridicule them?
Why should the Hindus allow you to have the benefits of being a Hindu when it’s beneficial to you, and the benefits of being an anti Hindu whenever it is beneficial to you?
Why Hindus should suffer in both the cases?
Why should you be allowed to get benefits in both the cases?
If you are not a Hindu, you would never be allowed to get its benefits.
And if you are a Hindu, you can’t be allowed to ridicule the other Hindus in your profound stupidity.
If you are a secular Hindu and hate the other Hindus because they are not secular in your profound stupid eyes, you are invited respectfully to discuss your points and to prove you are right.
You can do it.
But if instead of discussing your points if you stupidly ridicule the actually secular, rational, scientific and mathematical Hindus you’d be ridiculed too.
If instead of behaving as a prudent person, you choose to behave irresponsibly, why should a responsible person follow you?
Why shouldn’t he/she ridicule you in the same way and bring your profound stupidity in front of the other reasonable responsible persons?
‘By Eternal Truth Ādityās stand’ ‘R’ténādityāstishŧhanti’ means never act as if you are a planet or Earth.
You are certainly NOT.
You are an Āditý, a Sun.
A sun has to take care of the entire planets including the Earth too.
You can’t afford to be as negligent to the eternal truth, ‘R’t’ as your other family members can.
To the most, they would harm only themselves thus.
But if you do the same mistake you would harm the entire family.
Your position is more important than your rest of the family members.
You are bound to follow eternal truth.
You are bound to be brave and vigorous so that you can safeguard and protect your family members.
You are bound to burn yourself as the suns do for the life and existence of their solar system.
‘By Eternal Truth Ādityās stand’ ‘R’ténādityāstishŧhanti’.
5. ‘Divi somo adhi shritah’.
You have to allow polygamy as a potential possibility at least if you really follow the system We propose.
Again, you can’t be allowed to have and eat your cake simultaneously.
If you live in a country that does not allow polygamy legally for your religious group, while it does allow the same for another religious group living in the same country, you must fight against such a shameless double standard in legal practice even.
If you think, polygamy is itself not correct you must revolt against the society that is allowed legally to practice it too.
However, you must never fight against the society itself enjoying such privileged legal rights.
The shameless corrupt politicians do such legal discriminations to keep different societies in their country fighting with each other and rule them.
They practically believe in the dangerous policy of ‘Divide and rule’, even if they don’t admit it in so many words.
Such imprudent policies are not only dangerous to the societies that are not in the position to avail of such discriminatory legal rights; these are far more dangerous to the societies that are allowed to enjoy such legal rights.
The societies having less rights, always hate the societies having more rights, whether one likes it or not.
In India, it has resulted in profound hatred against Musalmīn.
Hindus inadvertently hate Musalmīn even if they are not aware of any such hatred they are nourishing against Musalmīn in their heart unknowingly.
The unscrupulous politicians understand it and deliberately nurse it so that they keep divided both the societies and rule them.
Musalmān women find other women have not to bear other women in their marital status as their co wives as they have to.
They become jealous of such women enjoying exclusive marital bliss.
And in their jealousy they go to the extent to attract their Hindu husband.
It happens more if the Musalmān husband, practicing polygamy, doesn’t do justice among his Musalmān wives.
The Musalmān wives, who don’t get justice from their Musalmān husband, find a Hindu lover for themselves both to punish their Musalmān husband and keep themselves happy.
In India, it’s more drastic as most of the Musalmīn here are either uneducated or under educated.
Why a Musalmān woman, if she were intelligent, prudent and smart, would opt for an uneducated/under educated Musalmān husband while an equally intelligent, prudent and smart, highly educated Hindu husband/lover is available to her without any extra effort?
It brings hatred among loser Musalmīn against gaining Hindus.
The shrewd politicians again get benefits of ‘Divide and rule‘ policy, practically, even if they never accept it in so many words.
Atharv Ved: Kaand 14| Sookt 1| Mantr 2
More Commentary on Ved from DSM Satyarthi:
1. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 1| Mantr 1
2. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 1| Mantr 2
3. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 1| Mantr 3
4. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 5| Mantr 3
5. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 7| Mantr 5
6. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 7| Mantr 8
4. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 1
5. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 2
6. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 3
7. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 4
8. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 5
9. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 6
10. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 7
11. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 8
12.R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 9
13. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 33| Mantr 1
14. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 33| Mantr 2
14. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 58| Mantr 6
15. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 164| Mantr 20
16. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 164| Mantr 46
17. R’gved: Mandal 2| Sookt 1| Mantr 1
18 R’gved: Mandal 3| Sookt 1| Mantr 1
19. R’gved: Mandal 3| Sookt 6| Mantr 2
20. R’gved: Mandal 4| Sookt 1| Mantr 1
21. R’gved: Mandal 4| Sookt 26| Mantr 2
22. R’gved: Mandal 5| Sookt 1| Mantr 1
23. R’gved: Mandal 6| Sookt 1| Mantr 1
24. R’gved: Mandal 7| Sookt 1| Mantr 1
25. R’gved: Mandal 8| Sookt 1| Mantr 1
26. R’gved: Mandal 9| Sookt 1| Mantr 1
27. R’gved: Mandal 9| Sookt 63| Mantr 4-5
28. R’gved: Mandal 10| Sookt 1| Mantr 1
29. R’gved: Mandal 10| Sookt 85| Mantr 42
30. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 1| Mantr 1
31. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 1| Mantr 2
32. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 1| Mantr 3
33. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 1| Mantr 4
34. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 11| Mantr 1
35. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 13| Mantr 4
36. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 23| Mantr 3
37. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 31| Mantr 18
38. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 40| Mantr2
39. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 40| Mantr8
40. Saamved: Mantr 1
41. Sāmved: Mantr 115
42. Sāmved: Mantr 641: Mahānāmnyārchik| 1
43. Sāmved: Mantr 650: Mahānāmnyārchik| 10
44. Sāmved: Mantr 651: Uttarārchik
45. Atharv Ved: Kaand 1| Sookt 1| Mantr 1
46. Atharv Ved: Kānd 3| Sookt 30| Mantr 3
47. Atharv Ved: Kānd 3| Sookt 30| Mantr 4
48. Atharv Ved: Kānd 3| Sookt 30| Mantr 6
49. Atharv Ved: Kānd 4| Sookt 4| Mantr 6
50. Atharv Ved: Kānd 4| Sookt 4| Mantr 7
51. Atharv Ved: Kānd 4| Sookt 4| Mantr 8
52. Atharv Ved: Kaand 4| Sookt 13| Mantr 1
53. Atharv Ved: Kaand 8| Sookt 1| Mantr 6
54. Atharv Ved: Kaand 8| Sookt 4| Mantr 22
55. Atharv Ved: Kaand 14| Sookt 1| Mantr 1
56. Atharv Ved: Kaand 14| Sookt 1| Mantr 2
57. Atharv Ved: Kaand 14| Sookt 1| Mantr 3
58. Atharv Ved: Kaand 14| Sookt 1| Mantr 4
59. Atharv Ved: Kaand 14| Sookt 1| Mantr 22
60.Atharv Ved: Kaand 14| Sookt 2| Mantr 25