Al Muħammad Al Qāsim’s utmost greedy relatives

Al Muħammad Al Qāsim’s

 utmost greedy relatives

  1.    Al Nadīm Al Quddūs Al Muħammad Al Qāsim’ half/real brother
  2.     Al Safiyah Al Ghaus Al Nadīm Al Quddūs’s awfully stunning wife, a mastermind, ex hostess of Las Vegas Nevada gambling house, the real brain power against Al Waħīdah Al Tawīd and Al Muħammad Al Qāsim.
  3.        Al Zakiyah Al Qāsim, Al Muħammad Al Qāsim’s sister
  4.          Vikram Bachhalyā, Al Zakiyah Al Qāsim’s husband
  5.           Al Lubnā Al Qāsim, Al Muħammad Al Qāsim’s one more sister
  6.           Pratāp Bachhalyā, Al Lubnā Al Qāsim’s husband
  7.          Al Hudā Al Qāsim Al Hāshmī, their advocate
  8.          Naåīmah Muħammad Ħasan, Al Safiyah Al Ghaus’s friend, philosopher and guide
  9. Naåīmah Muħammad Ħasan’s Seven Movements

—————————————————————

1. More Creative Adult Sex in English from Durgesh

2.Durgesh in Hindi/Urdu

3. Science Fiction

4. On History

5. Commentary on Ved

6. On Hinduism

7. On Islam

Ved: Ved Bhāshý: R’gved: Mandal 1: Sūkt 24: Mantr 10

VED: R’gved

Mandal 1

Sūkt 24: Mantr 10

Ashŧak 1| Adhyāý 2|

Anuvāk 6| Varg 13| Mantr 10

 DSM Satyarthi

———————————————————————–

Amī y’ r’xā, nihitās uchchā,

Naktam dadr’shré, kuh chiddivéyuh?

Adabdhāni varuñasý vratāni

Vichākashachchandramā naktaméti.

—————————————————————

 1These which constellations2,embedded high3, visible by night, where do they go by day4?

Imperishable the regulations5 of Varuñ6,

Especially reflecting light7, the moon moves by night8.

————————————————————–

1R’shi: Dévrāt Vaishvāmitr, formerly known as Shunahshép Ājīgarti.

Originally, he was son of Ajīgart, ‘Ājīgarti’.

Aétaréý Brāhmañ, 7|17, states Vedarshi Lord Bhagvān Vishvāmitr adopted Shunahshép Ājīgarti as his own son.

He renamed Shunahshép Ājīgarti as Dévrāt Vaishvāmitr.

Why his originally surname ‘Ājīgarti’ was changed into ‘Vaishvāmitr’, is not written there, in Aétaréý Brāhmañ, 7|17.

Why even his original name ‘Shunahshép’ was changed into ‘Dévrāt’ by Vedarshi Lord Bhagvān Vishvāmitr, is also not written there.

Aétaréý Brāhmañ, 7|17, states only:

Dévā vā imam mahyamarāsatéti s’ h’ Dévrāto Vaishvāmitr ās.’

Āchārý Sāyañ has written in his commentary on this Mantr:

Tathā ch’ anukrāntam kasý panchonājīgartih Shunah Shépah s’ kr’trimo Vaishvāmitro Dévrāto…’

Dévtā/Divine Subject: Varuñ, Eīshān Param Brahm Paramātmā and/or Param Purush/Ācharañ Nāyak

Chhand/Vedic Meter: Trishŧup

 R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 33| Mantr 1

————————————————————-

More from DSM Satyarthi:

1.  Commentary on Ved

2. More On Hinduism

3. On Islam

4. On History

5. Science Fiction

6.  Creative Adult Sex in English from Durgesh

7. Durgesh in Hindi/Urdu

 

Ved Bhāshý: Atharv Ved: Kānd:3: Sookt: 24: Mantr: 5

Ved Bhāshý:

4 Atharv Ved:

Kānd: 3: Sookt: 24: Mantr: 5

Vedic Socialism

DSM Satyarthi

————————————————————————-

Shathast samāhar, sahasrhast sam kir,

Kr’tasý kāryasý chéh sphātim samāvah.

———————————————————————–

 1Hundred-handed one2, bring together optimum3.

Thousand-handed one4, distribute optimum5.

Of what has been done6 and of what has to be done7, maintain the largensss optimum8.

—————————————————————

1.R’shi: Bhr’gu

Dévtā/Divine Subject: Vanaspati/Prajāpati

Chhand/Meter: Anushŧup

 Atharv Ved: Kānd 3| Sookt 30| Mantr 3

—————————————————————

 More from DSM Satyarthi:

1.  Commentary on Ved

2. More On Hinduism

3. On Islam

4. On History

5. Science Fiction

6.  Creative Adult Sex in English from Durgesh

7. Durgesh in Hindi/Urdu

Ved: 2 Yajurved: Adhyāý 40: Mantr 14

Ved: 2 Yajurved:

Uttar Vinshati:

Adhyāý 40: Mantr 14

DSM Satyarthi

———————————————————————————

Vidyām chāvidyām ch’ yastdvédobhayagvong

sah, avidyayā mr’tyum tīrtvā

vidyayāmr’tamashnuté

————————————————————————-

1Science and nescience2 who knows both simultaneously3, by nescience crossing death4, by science attains Eternity5

——————————————————————-

1R’shi: Dīrghtamā Mahimvat Vaishvāmitr

Dévtā/Divine Subject: Ātmā: The Soul

Chhand/Meter: Svarādushñik

Svar: R’shabh

Saamved: Mantr 1

Ved: Ved Bhashy: R’gved: Mandal 7: Sookt 104: Mantr 24

Ved: Ved Bhashy:

R’gved: 5973

Mandal 7:

Sookt 104: Mantr 24

DSM Satyarthi

——————————————————————————–

Indr, jahi pumānsam yātudhānamut striyam

māyayā shāshdānām.

Vigrīvāso mūrdévā r’dantu,

mā té dr’shantsūryamuchcharantam.

————————————————————————-

1Indr, slay yātudhān2 male3, and female doing mischief by deception4.

Let the Fools’ gods5, with bent necks6, fall and perish7.

They must not see the rising sun8.

——————————————————————————

  1. R’shi: Vasishŧh Maitrāvaruñi

Dévtā/ Divine Subject: Indr, the controller of organs

Chhand/Vedic Meter: Trishŧup

R’gved: Mandal 8| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

———————————————————————-

 More from DSM Satyarthi:

1.  Commentary on Ved

2. More On Hinduism

3. On Islam

4. On History

5. Science Fiction

6.  Creative Adult Sex in English from Durgesh

7. Durgesh in Hindi/Urdu

Ved Bhāshý: Atharv Ved: Kānd: 14: Sookt: 1: Mantr:59

Ved Bhāshý:

4 Atharv Ved:

Kānd: 14: Sookt: 1: Mantr:59

DSM Satyarthi

———————————————————————————————-

Udyachchhadhvamap raxo hanāthémām nārīm sukr’té dadhāt.

Dhātā vipashchit patimasyai vivéd bhago rājā pur étu prajānan.

——————————————————————————–

1Stand up2/Raise ye3. Smite away the demons4. Set this woman for well doer5. Inspired holder/guardian6 must know especially7 the husband for her8. The well knowing politician9 come first/ahead10 for her genital organ11.

—————————————————————————————–

 1.R’shikā: Sūryā Sāvitrī

Dévtā/ Divine Subject: Ātmā, Soul

Chhand/Meter: Trishŧup

2. ‘Ut yachchhadhvam’.

Don’t remain idle, neither as you are.

You have to do something that the wickeds never do.

Even the wicked ones are never idle, nor obsessed with their inherent inertia as you are.

Never forget your inherent inertia would invariably lead you to your death ultimately.

The life is actually the endless fight with your inherent inertia, and nothing at all.

The animals surrender to their inherent inertia and die eventually ultimately.

If you too act similarly, you haven’t upgraded yourself/ yourselves to a human being.

Pashavo Jāymānāh.

3. ‘Ut yachchhadhvam’.

You have to do some effort if you really want to progress/survive/do something.

Never surrender to your inherent inertia.

Kurvannévéh karmāñi jijīvishéchchhatagvong samāh,

Évam tvayi nānyathétosti n’ karm lipyaté naré.’

Only doing actions here, wish to live hundreds of years. Only in this way in you, never otherwise, action cleaveth not to man.’

Ved: Yajurved: 40|2

7. that her husband must be a Sukr’t, a well doer, and well doer only.

He must ensure absolutely, beyond doubt, that he is not a wicked.

It should never be taken lightly.

He must know and guarantee it especially, ‘Vivéd’.

After all he is a Dhātā and he must be Vipashchit.

If he is a Dhātā and he is not a Vipashchit, he must take the help of other Vipashchits.

 Atharv Ved: Kaand 14| Sookt 2| Mantr 25

——————————————————————————————–

 More from DSM Satyarthi:

1.  Commentary on Ved

2. More On Hinduism

3. On Islam

4. On History

5. Science Fiction

6.  Creative Adult Sex in English from Durgesh

7. Durgesh in Hindi/Urdu

Ved: Ved Bhashy’: R’gved: Mandal 1: Sookt 33: Mantr 10

Ved Bhāshý:

 

R’gved

 Mandal 1

 Sūkt 33: Mantr 10

————————————————————————————–

N’ yé divah pr’thivyā antamāpurn

māyābhirdhandām parýbhūvan.

Yujam vajram vr’shabhashchakr indro

nirjyotishā tamso gā aduxat.

———————————————————————-

n’| yé |divah| pr’thivyāh| antam| āpuh| n’| māyābhih| dhan’dām| pari’abhūvan| yujam| vajram| vr’shbhah| chakré| indrah| nih| jyotishā| tamsah| gāh| adhuxat.

—————————————————————————–

They who neither did get the end of divine

heaven and earth, nor altogether disgraced the

female wealth giver, with wisdoms, vr’shabh did

yuj vajr.

The controller of organs, continuously,

with light, milked the cows from out of darkness.

————————————————————————–

  1. R’shi: Hirañyastūp Mahimvat Āngiras.

Lord Bhagvān Hirañyastūp Mahimvat Āngiras has witnessed so many Ved Mantrs in R’gved, Yajurved and Sāmved.

He has witnessed Sūkt 31-35, entire five Sūkts/hymns of R’gved, Mandal/Book 1, that Lord Bhagvān Agni Mahimvat R’gvedarshi have actually seen these five Sūkts.

He hasn’t written them himself from his own intellect.

It is said in Aétréý Brāhmañ 3|24, that Lord Bhagvān Hirañyastūp Mahimvat Āngiras achieved the throne of Indr, controller of organs.

Nirukt 10|3|32 states that Lord Bhagvān Hirañyastūp Mahimvat Āngiras was a R’shi, a seer, a Psychological Engineer.

According to Br’haddévtā 3|106, Lord Bhagvān Hirañyastūp Mahimvat Āngiras was honored with the friendship of Param Purush, the Absolute Man himself:

Hirañyastūpatām prāpý sakhyam chéndréñ shāshvatam…’

Hirañyastūp, receiving the eternal friendship of the controller of organs, Param Purush…’

Āchārý Sāyañ has also certified that Lord Bhagvān Hirañyastūp Mahimvat Āngiras was a R’shi, a seer, a Psychological Engineer:

Āngiraso Hirañyastūp R’shih…’

R’gved 1| Sūkt 31 Sāyañ Bhāshý

Dévtā/Divine subject: Indr, controller of organs.

Chhand/ Vedic Meter: Trishŧup.

2.    N’ yé divah antam āpuh’ ‘Who didn’t get the end of divine heaven.’

The Heaven is divine and endless.

Every reality is different from another and endless.

We have created you with a miraculous brain/body.

Your brain has its Conscious, Sub conscious and Para Conscious parts.

Similarly, your body has infinite etheric bodies inside it.

Each of your etheric bodies is related with a reality you

may conceive.

There are seven Chakrs, Cycles, in your physical body.

You may activate them one by one if you want to.

Thus, you may start your Heaven right from the very moment you want to.

This Heaven is already there for you, yet you can transform it according to your wishes, desires and needs.

It’s divine, endless and flexible to your wishes, desires and needs, if you are Shaktimān enough.

However, if you are an atheist and don’t believe in the existence of Para Normal, that’s what you get for you.

There’s no compulsion for you to believe in what you don’t want to believe in.

There’s no compulsion for you to have a faith in what you don’t want to have a faith in.

It depends on your option what the reality you want to live in for you.

The fools create their own hell for them by opting for it.

We haven’t created you for hell.

Nevertheless, we haven’t created you for creating hell for others too.

If you do it, Our Automatic Scientific System working everywhere is bound to punish you, and you can’t break Our Automatic Scientific System ever, however Shaktimān, however Powerful you are/might be ever.

3. ‘N’ yé pr’thivyā antamāpuh’.

The earth is similarly endless for the persons of action.

Everything depends actually on your point of view that how you see it ab initio.

If you are basically a negative thinker, you see everything with a negative point of view.

It leads you gradually eventually ultimately to helplessness and depression, consequently.

If you are basically a positive thinker you would never find yourself helpless, never reaching to depression ultimately.

A positive thinking always leads to action ultimately.

Whereas a negative thinking always leads to depression.

No positive thinker has gone mad anywhere ever, neither has s/he committed suicide ever anywhere.

It doesn’t mean there isn’t any negativity anywhere.

The negativity is there doubtlessly.

But you have to destroy it, and ignore it until it isn’t destroyed if you really want to survive and progress.

There is poison in existence too.

But it doesn’t imply ever that you are bound to eat/drink the poison.

It has another purpose altogether.

The poison is used in medicines positively.

There are some medicines that can’t be made if poison isn’t used in making them.

Similarly only the existence of negativity doesn’t mean you have to surrender to it too, necessarily.

There are some persons who argue with their immense stupidity that everything is made by Us for its use.

So, there are bound to be some persons to resort to stupidity, negativity and death.

No, NEVER.

We haven’t created negativity ever.

It’s your own creation due to your immense stupidity.

We never created death for you.

It’s your own creation due to your ever adamant ever insistent ever persistent inertia and negativity.

Your inertia stops your further evolution into humanity and divinity.

You have to fight with your inertia and the resultant negativity if you really want to survive and progress ever.

Your death isn’t in action ever.

It’s always in inaction:

‘Kurvannév karmāñi jijīvishéchchhatagvong samāh,

Évam tvayi nānýthéto’sti n’ karm lipyaté naré.’

 Doing Karm only, here, one should wish to live hundreds of years.

Only this is the way for thee, none else;

So Karm cleaveth not to man.’

̶Ved: Yajurved: 40|2

4.      Pari’ in original text.

5.      Abhūvan’ in original text.

Never disgrace any female whosoever she is, and/or whatsoever her attributes are.

Her usefulness for humanity is never in her human attributes only.

She is useful for humanity even if she is a female animal.

A Sukr’t, a sāliħ, a good man can still use her for the existence and/or survival/progress for humanity.

That’s why there isn’t any human culture at all, even if it is even infinitesimally human, that has allowed death sentence for womankind and children.

A woman is always ‘Dhandā’ ‘Wealth Giver’, even if she is used by the wicked persons ever.

It’s self-explicit therefore why one should never disgrace her/womankind.

6.      Dhandā’ ‘Wealth Giver’.

The offspring a woman gives is itself a wealth if

You ever understand.

7.      If you disgrace a woman you actually disgrace the wealth itself.

8.      It isn’t wisdom at all.

Māyābhih’.

‘Māyā’ iti pragyā nāmasu paŧhitam.’: Nighanŧu: 3|9|9

11. ‘Yujam vajram vr’shabhashchakr’‘chakré’.

Most of the commentators from Brāhm denomination of Hinduism, not only insist but they even persistently keep arguing that ‘Vajr’ does not mean sexual male organ of a male that controls his organs and never uses any of his thus controlled organs against Our movement ‘Kr’ñvanto Vishvamāryam.

There are always some persons who charge Our obedients that they are liars/potential liars.

They say they have doubt in their credibility and therefore they are valid in not respecting them.

You may definitely leave them on their own anti Hindutv thoroughly erroneous thinking if they don’t want to improve them ever.

You may leave them with their ever erroneous ever harmful philosophy, but never bear, never tolerate if they disgrace your higher authorities in Hindutv.

Disgrace those morons yourselves to protect your own Hindutv.

Of course, you can’t order anyone out of Our Mandr, even if s/he is an atheist, but at the same time, you can’t allow them to disgrace or smirk your own higher authorities in Hindutv.

Your parents are of course not the parents of any guest that comes to your house, but it does not mean the guest can disgrace or smirk your parents and you have to tolerate it.

Never.

If you have to respect your guest, the guest must also respect you, your parents and your values.

The guest can discuss your values with your permission, but s/he does not have any cordial right even to disgrace or smirk them.

Disgrace or smirk that scoundrel yourself/yourselves.

You never have to tolerate if any person even discuss your values with you disgracing or smirking you.

It’s never a discussion.

It’s a holy war between two cultures orally under the disguise of discussion.

Never run away from any sort of Dharmyuddh, Vāj, whatsoever.

It may make you Yātudhān even.

Never tolerate or bear any disgrace or smirk of not only your higher authorities in Hindutv, but of that any Sukr’t even, nor that of your values too.

Svayambhūryāthātathyato’arthānvyadadhāchchhāshvatībhyah samābhyah.’

The Self existent has constituted the Values, according to facts, for eternal subjects/years.’

How can you allow anyone disgrace or smirk  these Values and can still value them yourselves?

If the Vr’trs/ Brātr’výs can respect their erroneous, even harmful to them religious values, why can’t you yourselves?

Make the scoundrels to respect your values and your higher authorities in Hindutv even when they want to discuss them with you.

Let them not accept Our Antim Ācharañ Nāyak Our Antim Ācharañ Nāyak, if they don’t want to.

It’s not one of Trishapt.

One can still be Our obedient if s/he respects and believes in Trishapt.

But s/he has to discuss it until s/he does not establish the fact beyond all reasonable doubt that s/he is justified in doing so.

As far as this argument is concerned that he is valid in not accepting Our Antim Ācharañ Nāyak Our Antim Ācharañ Nāyak until he does not complete Our Dharmsansthāpan, it’s absolutely unjustified prima facie.

What is there to accept after it’s complete?

Hinduism has in its basic Mantr:

Dhiyo yo nah prachodayāt

That impel our wisdoms’.

Where the wisdom is needed to understand anything if that is in front of your eyes.

Even an insect and an animal can see what is there in front of their eyes.

Then what for a human being needs wisdom?

Nobody is compelling any person(s) to accept Our Antim Ācharañ Nāyak Our Antim Ācharañ Nāyak.

We have never compelled even an atheist to accept Our Existence.

A person(s) is absolutely free not even to reject Our Antim Ācharañ Nāyak as Our Antim Ācharañ Nāyak, but even to act against him.

We are absolutely capable to protect him from all the scoundrels whoever come in his pathway to infinite humanity leading ever to divinity infinite.

We have protected him from the earlier holy wars some communal traditional Hindus fought against him.

We have protected him from terrorists and criminal Musalmīn.

We have protected him when he was fighting in writing for Us through an Islamic Magazine.

We have protected him when a Yātudhān challenged him that he is the worst sad person of the Multiverse that he doesn’t have a son.

We prophesied in Our Yogdr’shŧ Commentary of Ved then that not only Our Antim Ācharañ Nāyak but everyone that was following him then, would too have a son thereafter till further Yogdarshan otherwise.

The history stands to evidence it happened literally.

Didn’t it?

If you are really true in your conviction can you explain this phenomenon ever?

How Our Antim Ācharañ Nāyak could manage to do it if he were not Our Antim Ācharañ Nāyak?

We are always proving him that he is Our Antim Ācharañ Nāyak.

You haven’t proved even a single time that he is NOT Our Antim Ācharañ Nāyak.

Neither anyone can ever.

You can only create and spread suspicions, nothing else.

But even none of those suspicions is ever justified.

Our Antim Ācharañ Nāyak is building one after another  new heights for the entire humanity to reach, and what are you yourself doing?

Stand before a mirror and find it out yourself.

Our Antim Ācharañ Nāyak is fighting for humanity, NOT for any of his own selfish interest, whatsoever it may be.

Can you prove against it, beyond all reasonable doubt?

If ‘yes’, go ahead and prove it.

If ‘not’, shame on you that you are fighting against a selfless person even,

instead of fighting with the wretched lobby of the wicked ones.

Yujam vajram vr’shabhashchakr’‘chakré’ ‘Vr’shabh did yuj Vajr’ means the showerer, the sprayer, of semen unites his Vajr when he does it.

Never spill it out of any female organ.

The semen of a Vr’shabh is not as unimportant and worthless as to spill it ever out of any female sexual organ.

It’s an ever productive element.

Anything that’s made for any sort of production must never be wasted without production.

The Vr’tr Western Culture differs with Hinduism in this matter materially.

It says even masturbating is not as wrong as the entire religions say.

It says even lesbianism and gayness are not as wrong as the entire religions say.

Actually it has fought with these problems to its best but since it could not win these problems, gradually eventually ultimately it surrendered to them.

Hinduism/Ved is basically against everything and every action that’s ever unproductive if it can be made productive ever, by changing the social system/some arrangement that isn’t as productive as the new proposed system/ arrangement is.

Lesbianism is not actually a natural activity.

Gayness is similarly not a natural activity itself.

They are natural consequences of the gradual deviation of the West from the natural and scientific system of life the East had proposed in the form of Ved/Hinduism.

We know very well that most of the non-Hindus hate Ved/Hinduism very much, some of them even to the extent that they are uncompromisingly anti Hindu.

But it’s not because they know Ved/Hinduism competently.

On the contrary, it’s because they don’t even know what the real Ved/Hinduism is.

We suggest such persons not to lose their manhood, their family, the sanctity in their society and the infinite existence and endless progress of human beings.

It can be done still now if only you dissociate your unscientific prejudices against religion/Ved/Hinduism.

You were never taught what the true religion is, what the true Ved/Hinduism is.

Get rid of your prejudices against religion/Ved/Hinduism that you inherited from your ancestors, or from your ancestral society.

The humanity has come too far ahead now from the era when your ancestors, your ancestral society derived those prejudices against religion/Ved/Hinduism.

The fact is that these prejudices have brought you to your end if you can really see it.

Your ancestors, and your ancestral society hated Ved/Hinduism basically because it proposed to discipline your ancestors’ sex life too.

Due to their natural inertia they never wanted to discipline their sex life according to Ved/Hinduism proposed.

Your ancestors, your ancestral society was not alone that opposed Ved/Hinduism those days.

Even some of the sons of Hindus did it, were exiled ultimately and formed a new religion, Pārsism.

They claimed the Hindus were irons and the Parsis were Pāras, a stone that converts every iron into gold when it touches the iron.

They hated Hindus for their sex oriented religious practical scientific teachings.

The anti Hindu movement thus started first.

It was not easy to understand what the grave mistakes they were doing then.

But now it’s a history and we can study it perfectly unemotionally.

The irrefutable fact today is that the persons who were claiming they were the stones that were converting the iron Hindus then into gold, now have lost even their homeland for ever and are living in the homeland of Hindus they called irons once.

What happened?

Their over piety, not to understand the necessity of sexual discipline in their own household and society, ultimately started to destroy their family bindings.

It made their womankind vulnerable.

They surrendered to Hindus.

They had to.

We find Kaikéyī married to Dashrath and Mantharā conspiring against then better Hindu household and political system.

We find Gāndhārī married to Dhr’trāshŧr and Shakuni conspiring against then stronger empire Hastināpur.

In both the cases the women from outside were brought to India, not otherwise.

Do you need any more proof that Imām nārīm sukr’té dadhāt and Indro nirjyotishā tamso gā aduxat were really being practiced in ancient Hindus?

And India was stronger then, when India was practicing Imām nārīm sukr’té dadhāt and Indro nirjyotishā tamso gā aduxat.

Wasn’t it?

Should not the scholars and even other persons who claim Ved was neither ever interpreted principally nor practiced ever, it was only a book of worthless rituals, think afresh on what they believe erroneously still now?

It’s not detrimental to practicing Hindus now, it’s detrimental to yourselves.

Isn’t it?

The Hindus have their family bonds still stronger but can you say your family bonds are too as strong as that of Hindus?

Yes, you have some of the Apsarās from some traditional Hindus too.

But that was even when Hirañýkashipu conspired against Ved/Hinduism/Democracy.

Wasn’t it?

Didn’t Hinduism overcome it?

Didn’t Satī Dāxāyañī Brahmāpautrī revolt against such a rotten political system, successfully?

Didn’t entire Brahmarshis, Devarshis, Maharshis, and R’shis supported her even against Param Purush?

That’s the inherent attribute of Hinduism, ingredient into it.

It never surrenders to the wicked absolutely.

Yes, despite this inherent attribute of Hinduism the traditional Hindus were politically under the British and Musalmīn.

But it was never unopposed neither it lasted long ever.

What do you think Dīn-e-Ilāhī was?

Islam?

Study it more deeply getting rid of your false historical prejudices.

R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 45| Mantr 6

————————————————————————————

More from DSM Satyarthi:

1.  Commentary on Ved

2. More On Hinduism

3. On Islam

4. On History

5. Science Fiction

6.  Creative Adult Sex in English from Durgesh

7. Durgesh in Hindi/Urdu

Ved: Ved Bhashy’: R’gved: Mandal 9: Sookt 46: Mantr 3

Ved Bhāshý:

 R’gved

 Mandal 9

 Pavmān Som Mandal

 Sūkt 46: Mantr 3

————————————————————————————–

Été somas indavh prayasvantashchamū sutāh,

indram vardhanti karmbhih.

———————————————————————————–

1These som2, indu, doing efforts, are competent armies, expand the controller of organs through actions.

————————————————————————-

1R’shi: Ayāsý Mahimvat Āngiras Dévtā/Divine Subject: Pavmān Som Chhand/Vedic Meter: Gāyatrī

 2. ‘Parishkr’tās indavo yoshév pitryāvatī, vāyum soma asr’xat.’

‘Sanctified with constant efforts, immensely richest persons, as if a young lady, with her father, pride for him. Som created air.’

Ved: R’gved: 9|46|2

Ved: R’gved: Mandal 9 Sookt 63 Mantr 4-5

———————————————————————————-

More from DSM Satyarthi:

1.  Commentary on Ved

2. More On Hinduism

3. On Islam

4. On History

5. Science Fiction

6.  Creative Adult Sex in English from Durgesh

7. Durgesh in Hindi/Urdu

Ved: 4 Atharv Ved: Kānd 14| Vivāh Kānd: Sookt 1| Mantr 2

Ved: Ved Bhāshý

4 Atharv Ved

 Kānd 14 Vivāh Kānd:

 Sūkt 1| Mantr 2

DSM Satyarthi

—————————————————————————————————————

1By Som  Ādityās strong2 by Som Earth great3

No doubt4, in the genital organ of these constellations5, Som is established optimum6.

————————————————————————————————–

1.R’shikā: Sūryā Sāvitrī

Dévtā/ Divine Subject: Som

Chhand/Meter: Anushŧup

2. Ved is revealed in a telegraphic language, not in any ordinary language.

This basic fact, about Ved, always must be remembered while studying Ved gravely.

I’m sorry to say that the Westerners never studied Ved gravely.

I’m sorrier to say that the Westerners were never serious not only about Ved.

They were never equally serious about Bible and Qur’an too, as well.

These scriptures were never seriously studied by the Westerners.

If they were ever studied seriously, by the Westerners; the Western Culture, now on the path of its certain suicide, would never were on its suicidal path.

It was an unfortunate tragedy that when Ved, Bible and Qur’an were being studied by the Westerners, the Communism was fighting its own war of survival with religion.

It made the Communist thinkers more biased those days than they are not biased even today.

No biased studies should be taken seriously ever.

Yet, isn’t it a tragedy that, the entirely biased studies of those days, by the Communist thinkers are still being taken seriously?

Isn’t it a time to re-study Ved, Bible, Qur’an and the related literature more seriously, scientifically and absolutely unbiased, for a change?

We have one more benefit the Communist thinkers of those days didn’t have.

The Communism in those days was utopian somewhat, even after the great scientific studies Karl Marx and Frederick Engels did then.

It was not a scientific fact, known those days that, the Multiverse is made of vibrations of energy basically.

This fact, revealed and accepted scientifically afterwards, has changed the entire scenario of scientific studies about the matters the Communist thinkers had done their studies.

Marriage institution is also one of them.

The persons who have studied Western Culture seriously know very well that the Western Culture does not stand on scientific grounds only.

In fact, no culture can ever stand on scientific grounds only howsoever it insists to stand.

Any theory, any fact, when it is brought into practice always succumbs to human emotions prevailing those days.

It has to.

It hasn’t another option if it has to come into practice.

Humans never react scientifically only.

Neither can they ever do it.

Scientific facts are never emotional until they are facts only.

As soon as they are brought into practice they have to deal with the humans.

Humans include both males and females.

Not only females are emotional ones, the males are also not very different in the matter.

No doubt, the females are more emotionals than the males.

Nevertheless, even the males are not devoid of emotions absolutely.

Hence, any scientific fact, however factually it is known to us, when brought into practice, is bound to succumb to the emotional needs of the humans those are bringing it into practice.

That’s why the theory and practice always differ howsoever honest its implementers are.

That’s why even Eīshān Param Brahm Paramātmā has instructed us not to confine ourselves to the principles only i.e. Ved, but  to the very Mission of Life/ExistenceKr’ñvanto VishvamāryamDharm Santānam, Dharm Sansthāpan, as well; to bring the principles into practice and study Divý Itihās, the Divine History for it:

  1. Dhiyo yo nah prachodayāt
  2. Yāthātathyatah

This fact, once realized in its full form, can immensely help us to re-study about marriage institution once opposed by the Communist thinkers so insistently, so persistently.

The Communist thinkers of those days found marriage institution an immensely avoidable obstacle in their pathway to Communism.

They thought marriage institutions give birth to Private Property.

The Communist thinkers were right.

But they were not right in thinking that the family was the only institution that caused the accumulation of Private Property.

Moreover, owing to immense drastic failure of communist economic, social and political system around the entire globe, we have to think more gravely now do we really need to oppose private property anymore.

Aren’t the financial scams, not done by the advocates of Private Property, more serious, more dangerous and more destructive to the humanity and Democracy than the Private Property itself is?

We should never forget that the destruction of Private Property absolutely, leads to destroy the family itself.

Frederick Engels has already written in the subject as much as we don’t need any analysis more to understand the subject comprehensively.

We need Private Property to protect and safeguard a family.

We have no other option to it.

Consequently, why not support Welfare Capitalism and State Capitalism instead of opposing Private Property?

We have experienced bitterly that our industries can’t survive in so-called Communism.

Moreover, we have experienced bitterly too that Communism has led to a totalitarianism called Stalinism now.

We need industries to go ahead.

In fact, we need industries to march ahead.

The Welfare Capitalism and State Capitalism are more suitable for it then the so-called Communism or the ‘Socialism’ prone to nonstop Scams.

Shouldn’t we think over it more gravely now?

Today, we can easily observe around us that even the singles have Private Property.

Moreover, to be more exactly honest and sincere, the entire history of humankind has proven now that the singles crave for Private Property even more than the married persons do.

Why is it so?

Because the married persons have their family to take care of them in their old age, while the singles don’t.

They have only their money to take care of them in their old age.

It is the reason why the singles are found more corrupt than the married persons in accumulating Private Property and wealth.

That’s why Hinduism does not support single life, except only when a single can’t afford even a single wife.

It specifically orders:

S’ nah pitév sūnavé’gné sūpāyano bhav,

Sachasvā nah svastayé.’

‘He, be unto us, as a father to son, Agni, easy to access.

Be together optimum, properly, for our welfare.’

—      Ved: R’gved: 1| 1| 9

Ihaiv stam mā vi yaushŧam vishvamāyurvyashnutam,

Krīdantau putrairnaptr’bhirmodmānau své gr’hé.’

‘Abide ye both only here. Don’t be separated. Enjoy whole life sporting with sons grandsons, rejoicing in own home.’

—      Ved: R’gved: 10| 85| 42

Ihaiv stam mā vi yaushŧam vishvamāyurvyashnutam,

Krīdantau putrairnaptr’bhirmodmānau svastakau.’

‘Abide ye both only here. Don’t be separated. Enjoy whole life sporting with sons grandsons4, rejoicing in the lovely home.’

—      Ved: Atharv Ved: 14|1|22

The Communist thinkers never thought, neither they could, in those days of too limited resources to research anything that, marriage institution was not the only vice in their pathway to Communism.

In fact, the singles are more severe problems in their way.

The Communist thinkers wildly opposed marriage institution and family.

In fact they are still opposing it blindly, not even realizing the fact that the entire history of humankind has already proven them wrong now.

The Communism as a movement has lost its original momentum now.

It is not because it’s nonsense, as it’s claimed by its blind communal opponents.

The Communism as a movement is not nonsense.

It is necessary for the uplifting of the downtroddens.

Even Hinduism has the same goal as The Communism as a movement has.

The point where Hinduism differs with the Communism as a movement is not its goal, its means of implementation instead.

So, the Communism as a movement doesn’t need to oppose either marriage institution or family ever to achieve its mission.

Hinduism, Islam, Judaism, Christianity, in fact no religion, basically, is in opposition to the Communism as a movement, at all.

The Communism as a movement believed that the mission could be achieved through the dictatorship of the laborers.

The subsequent history of humankind has now expressly proven that such a belief of the then Communists was wrong.

Why?

Because, as already said, the Communism was then only a theory.

It was never practiced by its propellers.

Every theory when it is brought into practice, always refines itself.

No theorist can ever anticipate, absolutely and flawlessly, what lies in its pathway in future.

After all, every theorist, whatsoever theory he/she propels, is a human being, and bound to remain a human being.

A human being is not an omniscient, neither he/she ever can be.

So, howsoever the theory he/she proposes is flawless when propelled, it’s bound to prove in future that it wasn’t so.

The laborers never knew how the enterprises are built up and run.

If they had known how to build up enterprises and how to run them, they would have already done it without any help of the Communist thinkers.

Why have they waited for the moment the Communist thinkers declare them the dictators of a country?

To build up any enterprise first of all an enterpriser has to dream of it to the extent that it becomes an obsession to him/her.

Until and unless it isn’t an obsession to him even an enterpriser can’t build up any enterprise let alone any laborer or a group of laborers.

An enterpriser builds up his/her enterprise first in his/her own mind with its each and every minutest details.

He is so obsessed with these minutest details that, he sees it in his mind.

This imaginary vision in his/her mind always exists in his/her mind while he/she attempts to bring it into fact.

Until and unless this obsession does not become his/her madness, he/she can’t bring into existence.

It’s also a labor, the original Communist thinkers never realized.

That’s why when they took hold of the excellently running enterprises and put them under the dictatorship of the laborers, even the excellently running enterprises failed to continue.

The dictators lacked this vision, this obsession, and this madness.

It was the oxygen an enterpriser supplies to the enterprises.

Unfortunately only he/she can do it, none else.

The Communist thinkers never realized it.

The Communist thinkers made the laborers dictators on the shrewd persons who knew very well how to win the obstacles in their pathways.

They bribed the laborers in administration heavily.

The laborers in administration had never seen money.

They surrendered to the bribery of shrewdest businesspersons.

The movement started suffering heavily.

And ultimately it flopped.

It had to.

The laborers in administration were most of the persons who were everlosers.*

Watch your present day politicians.

Who are they?

Isn’t it a fact that most of them are the persons who are highly Uneducated/Under educated?

Isn’t it a fact that so many of them are criminal/criminal minded?

Why is it so?

Because most of the laborers in administration were dictators, but the persons they dictated were shrewder and more efficient.

The businesspersons became kingmakers instead of kings.

Apparently the businesspersons were not administrators, the chosen representatives of the people were.

But the businesspersons were kingmakers and shrewder.

The dictatorship of the Uneducated/Under educated ones, on shrewder persons, made itself ineffective.

Administration requires prudence.

The laborers in administration hadn’t developed it.

The system, consequently, failed.

It had to.*

Ved: 4 Atharv Ved: Kānd 14| Vivāh Kānd: Sookt 1| Mantr 3

——————————————————————————

More Commentary on Ved from DSM Satyarthi:

1. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

2. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 1| Mantr 2

3. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 1| Mantr 3

4. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 5| Mantr 3

5. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 7| Mantr 5

6. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 7| Mantr 8

4. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 1

5. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 2

6. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 3

7. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 4

8. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 5

9. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 6

10. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 7

11. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 8

12.R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 9

13. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 33| Mantr 1

14. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 33| Mantr 2

14. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 58| Mantr 6

15. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 164| Mantr 20

16. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 164| Mantr 46

17. R’gved: Mandal 2| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

18 R’gved: Mandal 3| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

19. R’gved: Mandal 3| Sookt 6| Mantr 2

20. R’gved: Mandal 4| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

21. R’gved: Mandal 4| Sookt 26| Mantr 2

22. R’gved: Mandal 5| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

23. R’gved: Mandal 6| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

24. R’gved: Mandal 7| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

25. R’gved: Mandal 8| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

26. R’gved: Mandal 9| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

27. R’gved: Mandal 9| Sookt 63| Mantr 4-5

28. R’gved: Mandal 10| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

29. R’gved: Mandal 10| Sookt 85| Mantr 42

30. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 1| Mantr 1

31. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 1| Mantr 2

32. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 1| Mantr 3

33. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 1| Mantr 4

34. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 11| Mantr 1

35. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 13| Mantr 4

36. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 23| Mantr 3

37. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 31| Mantr 18

38. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 40| Mantr2

39. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 40| Mantr8

40. Saamved: Mantr 1

41. Sāmved: Mantr 115

42. Sāmved: Mantr 641: Mahānāmnyārchik| 1

43. Sāmved: Mantr 650: Mahānāmnyārchik| 10

44. Sāmved: Mantr 651: Uttarārchik

45. Atharv Ved: Kaand 1| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

46.  Atharv Ved: Kānd 3| Sookt 30| Mantr 3

47. Atharv Ved: Kānd 3| Sookt 30| Mantr 4

48. Atharv Ved: Kānd 3| Sookt 30| Mantr 6

49. Atharv Ved: Kānd 4| Sookt 4| Mantr 6

50. Atharv Ved: Kānd 4| Sookt 4| Mantr 7

51. Atharv Ved: Kānd 4| Sookt 4| Mantr 8

52. Atharv Ved: Kaand 4| Sookt 13| Mantr 1

53. Atharv Ved: Kaand 8| Sookt 1| Mantr 6

54. Atharv Ved: Kaand 8| Sookt 4| Mantr 22

55. Atharv Ved: Kaand 14| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

56. Atharv Ved: Kaand 14| Sookt 1| Mantr 2

57. Atharv Ved: Kaand 14| Sookt 1| Mantr 3

58. Atharv Ved: Kaand 14| Sookt 1| Mantr 4

59.  Atharv Ved: Kaand 14| Sookt 1| Mantr 22

60.Atharv Ved: Kaand 14| Sookt 2| Mantr 25

Why can’t we love each other?: Innallāh yuħibbul muttaqīn

Why can’t we love each other?:

Innallāh yuħibbul muttaqīn

Indeed, Allah loves the persons who control

themselves.

̶Al Qur’ān Al Karīm: 9 At-Tawbah: 4

DSM Satyarthi

I’m sorry to say that I don’t agree with the highly educated persons who claim that Al Qur’ān Al Karīm and Islam itself is dangerous to humankind.

I respect their concern for humankind.

As one of the humankind I also want to join them to protect myself, if even not the others.

But the fact is, the more I peruse Ved, Bible and Al Qur’ān Al Karīm, the more I find they don’t differ in their basic teachings.

The reason my such friends find Al Qur’ān Al Karīm and Islam itself is dangerous to humankind, is that they don’t study Al Qur’ān Al Karīm in its original Arabic.

They accept the explanations of Al Qur’ān Al Karīm its misinterpreters advance.

Please, never do it.

It’s the ever worst mistake the critics of Islam are repeating ever since Islam has come into existence.

I propose them to study Al Qur’ān Al Karīm in its original Arabic, thoroughly rejecting its explanations from its communal interpreters.

I’m sure and immensely confident you’ll find, neither Al Qur’ān Al Karīm nor Islam itself, is as dangerous to humankind as my such friends think.

Yes, the Arabs, the Iranians and so many of the  Musalmīn even, are using both Al Qur’ān Al Karīm and Islam today for spreading their own imperialism.

But that’s what I’ve already written in my now famous essay:

Most Present day Muslims don’t do what Huzoor(SAW) did’.

I request you to go through it once more.

How Al Qur’ān Al Karīm and Islam itself is responsible for what its so called followers do?

Al Qur’ān Al Karīm says:

Innallāh yuħibbul muttaqīn.’

‘Indeed, Allah loves the persons who control themselves.’

̶ Al Qur’ān Al Karīm: 9 At-Tawbah: 4

Do the terrorists control themselves?

Are they really muttaqīn?

Do the imperialists control themselves?

Are the imperialists really muttaqīn?

I don’t think so.

My dear friends, my very dear friends, Islam is not in what the terrorists, the imperialists and even the Musalmīn do.

The Musalmīn have to follow Islam.

Islam doesn’t have to follow Musalmīn.

Please be rational.

Don’t resort to irrationalism only because the terrorists, the imperialists and even the Musalmīn do so.

Islam itself tells what it is really.

I’ve already written an essay on it too:

Islam according to Qur’an and Maulana Maududi rahamatullh alaihi’.

One more reference to the persons who are really interested:

Islam according to Ved.’

I hope my such friends now will try to act more responsibly.

Please stop throwing mud on each other.

Why can’t we love each other instead, my dear friends?

Why there are differences among us?

How to establish ‘Rām Rājý’/

Ħukūmat-e-Ilāhī/The Kingdom of God

 —————————————————————————

More on Islam from DSM Satyarthi:

1. Bal huv qur’anum majeedun fe LAUHIM MAHFOOZIN

2. Innahu laquranun kareemun Fee kitabin maknoonin

3. ‘Hudallilmuttaqeen’: ‘Guidance for controllers of organs’: 2 Al Baqarah: 2

4. ‘Alaa qalbik litakoon minal-munzireen’ ‘upon your heart one of who to warn’

5. Muslimahs! Come to India. I recommend Hindu lovers for all the Muslimahs.: Khadeejah Muhammad

6. Islam according to Qur’an and Maulana Maududi rahamatullh alaihi

7. A Moment of grave thinking for the entire sophisticated Muslim Community

8. ‘SET THIS WOMAN for WELL DOER’: ‘Imaam naareem Sukr’te dadhaat’

9. ‘V’ innahu fe UMMALKITAABI ladainaa la’liyyun hakeemun’: 43/4

10. Most Present day Muslms don’t do what Huzoor(SAW) did:

11. The Muslim beauties are wooing Hindu men FASTEST

12. ‘What really matters in the sight of God’: Maulana: Maududi

13. Why did Islam face a counter revolution at Karbala?

14. Why there are differences among us?

15. No differences Please!

16. Llā yamassuhu illā almutahharūn

———————————————————————————

More from DSM Satyarthi:

1.  Commentary on Ved

2. More On Hinduism

3. On Islam

4. On History

5. Science Fiction

6.  Creative Adult Sex in English from Durgesh

7. Durgesh in Hindi/Urdu

—————————————————————–

More on Hinduism from DSM Satyarthi:

1. ‘Bhoorbhuvah svah!’ ‘The Existence! The Consciousness! The Bliss!’

2.‘Devasy’ pashy’ kaavyam, n’ mamaar, n’ jeeryati.’

3. Hinduism shines

4.Ved is the eternal law book having infinite knowledge in it for human beings

5. ‘According to facts’: ‘Yaathaatathyatah’

6. ‘SET THIS WOMAN for WELL DOER’: ‘Imaam naareem Sukr’te dadhaat’

7. The Evernew Hinduism: Yaathaatathyatah: Ved 2|40|8

8. ‘How to cross death’: ‘Tamev viditvaati mr’tyumeti’: Ved2Yajurved|31|18

9. According to Hinduism: We must be polite, not coward

10.Ye yathaa maam prapadyante taanstathaiv bhajaamyaham: Lord Kr’shn

—————————————————————————————————

Commentary on Ved from DSM Satyarthi:

1. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

2. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 1| Mantr 2

3. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 5| Mantr 3

4. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 5| Mantr 3

5. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 7| Mantr 5

6. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 7| Mantr 8

4. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 1

5. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 2

6. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 3

7. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 4

8. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 5

9. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 6

10. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 7

11. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 8

12.R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 9

13. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 58| Mantr 6

14. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 164| Mantr 20

15. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 164| Mantr 46

16. R’gved: Mandal 2| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

17 R’gved: Mandal 3| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

18. R’gved: Mandal 3| Sookt 6| Mantr 2

19. R’gved: Mandal 4| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

20. R’gved: Mandal 5| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

21. R’gved: Mandal 6| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

22. R’gved: Mandal 7| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

23. R’gved: Mandal 8| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

24. R’gved: Mandal 9| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

25. R’gved: Mandal 9| Sookt 63| Mantr 4-5

26. R’gved: Mandal 10| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

27. R’gved: Mandal 10| Sookt 85| Mantr 42

28. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 1| Mantr 1

29. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 1| Mantr 2

30. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 1| Mantr 3

31. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 1| Mantr 4

32. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 11| Mantr 1

33. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 13| Mantr 4

34. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 23| Mantr 3

35. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 31| Mantr 18

36. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 40| Mantr8

37. Saamved: Mantr 1

38. Sāmved: Mantr 115

39. Sāmved: Mantr 641: Mahānāmnyārchik| 1

40. Sāmved: Mantr 650: Mahānāmnyārchik| 10

41. Sāmved: Mantr 651: Uttarārchik

42. Atharv Ved: Kaand 1| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

43.  Atharv Ved: Kānd 3| Sookt 30| Mantr 3

44. Atharv Ved: Kānd 3| Sookt 30| Mantr 4

45. Atharv Ved: Kānd 3| Sookt 30| Mantr 6

46. Atharv Ved: Kānd 4| Sookt 4| Mantr 6

47. Atharv Ved: Kānd 4| Sookt 4| Mantr 7

48. Atharv Ved: Kānd 4| Sookt 4| Mantr 8

49. Atharv Ved: Kaand 8| Sookt 1| Mantr 6

50. Atharv Ved: Kaand 8| Sookt 4| Mantr 22

51.  Atharv Ved: Kaand 14| Sookt 1| Mantr 22

52.Atharv Ved: Kaand 14| Sookt 2| Mantr 25