Hinduism builds its society on SUKR’TS/Noble doers:
DSM Satyarthi
Hinduism builds its society on SUKR’TS:
‘Udyachchhadhvamap raxo hanaathemaam
naareem SUKR’TE dadhaat.
Dhaataa vipashchit patimasyai vived,
bhago raajaa pur etu prajaanan.’
‘Stand up/Raise ye. Smite away the demons. SET THIS WOMAN for WELL DOER. Inspired holder/guardian must know especially the husband for her. The well knowing politician come first/ahead for her genital organ.’
–Ved: 4 Atharv Ved: 14/1/59
Hinduism/ Ved does not think that a genital organ of a woman is insignificant ever.
Instead, it especially instructs its politicians, Rājā, to pay special attention to it:
‘Dhātā vipashchit patimasyai vivéd’ ‘Inspired holder/guardian must know especially the husband for her.’
‘bhago rājā pur étu prajānan’. ‘The well knowing politician come first/ahead for her genital organ.’
It is important because it is needed and it is indispensable for the survival of humanity itself.
That’s why Hinduism has given, a treatise even much abused by the foolish persons, Kām Sūtr’ etc.
Sex is not as insignificant to Hinduism as it is to the others.
Moreover, who can sincerely deny the importance of sex in human life?
It’s actually a shameless hypocrisy to deny it.
Hinduism doesn’t believe in any hypocrisy whatsoever the non Hindu religions do.
Hinduism is bold enough to accept it and even goes ahead to declare it the third goal, TR’tīý Purushārth, of human life.
Hinduism cares for the survival of humanity itself, more than the others do.
Hinduism is, thus, a society of SUKR”TS, WELL DOERS, only.
An evil doer does not have any matrimonial rights, in Hinduism, thus; while the woman marrying him, is NOT bound to be a well doer.
She may be a well doer, she may be NOT.
Any woman can marry a Sukr’t, even if she does not agree with his system of life.
That’s why PITR’YAGY’ in Hinduism, Not MAATR’YAGY’.
That’s why ‘ANUVRATAH PITUH PUTRO‘, not ‘Anuvratah MAATUH putro‘
That’s why PATRIARCHAL SYSTEM OF HINDUISM, not Matriarchal.
It’s not gender biased actually.
It’s GOOD DEED biased, to build an eternal humane society MARCHING AGGRESSIVELY TO INFINITE DIVINITY always.
‘Ut devaa avhitam devaa unnyathaa punah,
Utaagashchakrusham devaa devaa jeevyathaa punah.‘
‘Divine ones! Divine ones!
raise up the downtrodden.
And, Divine ones! Divine ones!
Make him to live again, who hath done evil.’
–-Ved: 4 Atharv Ved: 4/13/1
‘Om ishe tvorjje tvaa vaayav sth’ devo vah savitaa praarpayatu shreshthtamaay’ karman’aapyaayadhvamaghnyaa’in draay’ bhaagam prajaavateeranameevaa’ayaxmaa maa v’ sten eishat maaghshagvagvonso dhruvaa’asmin gopatau syaat bahveeryajmaanasy’ pashoonpaahi.’
‘Om! for food/the will power, thee. For energy, thee. Breezes are ye. Divine Creator impel, you all, to noblest work. Complete properly, Inviolable female! share for the controller of organs. Rich in offspring/subject. Free from sickness. Free from diminishing. No thief rule on you, no evil-praiser. Be constant in this master of ‘go’, numerous females! Guard the cattle of the worshiper.’
–Ved: 2 Yajurved: 1/1
Lord Kr’shn’ announces:
‘Yada yada hi dharmasy’ glaanirbhavati, Bhaarat!
abhyutthaanamadharmasy’, tadaatmaanam sr’jaamyaham.
paritraan’aay’ saadhoonaam,
VINAASHAAY’ CH’ DUSHKR’TAAM,
DHARMSANSTHAAPNAARTHAAY’ sambhavaami yuge yuge.’
‘Whenever persons feel humiliation for noble deeds, Bhaarat! and pride on evil deeds; then I create myself. To protect the nobles and to destroy the wickeds, to establish humanity leading to divinity, I do appear in every era.’
–Shrimad Bhagvad Geeta: 4/7-8
VINAASHAAY’ CH’ DUSHKR’TAAM’
‘TO DESTROY THE WICKEDS‘
DHARMSANSTHAAPNAARTHAAY’
‘to establish humanity leading to divinity‘
What is Dharmsansthaapan?
What is establishment of humanity leading to divinity?
Destruction of wickeds: VINAASHAAY’ CH’ DUSHKR’TAAM‘
Then who will remain?
Obvously,
SUKR’TS:THE NOBLES.
‘IMAAM NAAREEM SUKR’TE DADHAAT‘
‘SET THIS WOMAN FOR WELL DOER.’
To whom particular well doer?
The woman HERSELF will decide it, none else:
‘Brahmcharyen’ kanyaa yuvaanam vindate patim,
anadvaan brahmcharyen’aashvo ghaasam jigeershati.’
‘By following orders of Brahm, girl obtains a young husband. By following orders of Brahm, a draft ox, a horse, strives to gain food.’
–Ved: 4 Atharv Ved: 11/7/18
Only the foolish and childish persons, like Hassan 007, can claim, thus, that women are not given any right in Hinduism.
If not women, who are?
The ridiculous thing is, that they claim, a religion, that says women have half authenticity than men for evidences in courts, a religion that does not acknowledge that a woman is raped till there are not eye witnesses, has given more rights to womankind than Hinduism.
Even blind communalism must have some limits of its idiosyncrasies.
Islam materially differs with Hinduism in this matter.
Hinduism/Ved says:
‘Even wicked women too must not be married to a wicked. Otherwise, the wickedness will be transferred to the next generation.
This principle was practically followed by the Hindus to the extent that a detailed scientific study was commenced by the Hindu sages in the matter.
Here again, it is to be noticed that the male is represented here by the word Shiv that again means ‘Sukr’t‘.
A dushkr’t cannot be called Shiv, restricting Tantrs, thus, to Sukr’ts only.
The result was world famous Kaam Sootr by Brahmarshi Lord Vaatsyaayan.
Anangrang, Rati Rahasy’, Naagar Sarvasvam, Rati Manjaree, and even Tantrs, an Upved of Atharv Ved; were brought into existence.
Lord Vishn’u went to the extent to make love to his sisters in law/Salhajs Vr’nda and Tulsi, even deceiving them.
Because, his brothers in law/Saale, Jaalandhar and Shankhchood’, were evil doers.
There is a complete Chapter ‘Paardaarik Prakaran’-‘ , Part 5, ‘About the wives of others’; in Kaam Sootr.
The Bachhalyas/Vatss followed this principle to the extent that they were termed to be Dev Gandharvs even.
‘Y’ gaam dhaaryati s’ gandharvah‘.
‘A man who holds Ved/earth/organs/WOMEN is called ‘GANDHARV‘.
It’s interesting here to note that organs are being held here to have women, not to leave/renounce them, as it is erroneously supposed today.
Women are, thus, according to Ved, the responsibility of Sukr’ts, they can’t run away from.
Moreover, it is not limited to the principles only.
It was brought to the practice too, deliberately.
We find this principle, practically working in the life of Lord Kr’shn‘.
He is simultaneously considered Yogeshvar and a great lover of women too.
Hinduism, thus, believes in Exogamy for Sukr’ts, never in Endogamy.
It preaches its followers to be the ever-best marriage according to Ved.
Islam/Qur’an makes an adjustment here with the wickeds.
It says:
وَلَا تَنكِحُوا الْمُشْرِكَاتِ حَتَّىٰ يُؤْمِنَّ ۚ وَلَأَمَةٌ مُّؤْمِنَةٌ خَيْرٌ مِّن مُّشْرِكَةٍ وَلَوْ أَعْجَبَتْكُمْ ۗ
‘Wala tankihoo almushrikaati hatta yuminn. walaamatun muminatun khayrun min mushrikatin walaw aAAjabatkum
‘Wed not Al Mushrikaat, till they believe; for lo! a believing bondwoman is better than Mushrikaat, though she please you.’
—Al Qur’an Al Kareem: 2 Al Baqarah: 221
It further says:
لَا إِكْرَاهَ فِي الدِّينِ ۖ قَد تَّبَيَّنَ الرُّشْدُ مِنَ الْغَيِّ ۚ فَمَن يَكْفُرْ بِالطَّاغُوتِ وَيُؤْمِن بِاللَّهِ فَقَدِ اسْتَمْسَكَ بِالْعُرْوَةِ الْوُثْقَىٰ لَا
انفِصَامَ لَهَا ۗ وَاللَّهُ سَمِيعٌ عَلِيمٌ
La ikraha fiddeeni qad tabayyana alrrushdu min’ alghayyi faman yakfur bialttaghooti wayumin biAllahi faqadi istamsaka bialAAurwati alwuthqa la infisama laha waAllahu sameeAAun AAaleemun.
‘There is no compulsion in religion. The right direction is henceforth distinct from error. And he who rejecteth false deities and believeth in Allah hath grasped a firm handhold which will never break. Allah is Hearer, Knower.’
—Al Qur’an Al Kareem: 2 Al Baqarah: 256
The persons who study Ved and Qur’an comparatively, often wonder why Ved and Qur’an are so exactly opposite in the policy, while in almost all the rest of the other policies, they adopt exactly similar attitudes.
Ved orders:
‘Marry wicked women even, without any condition whatsoever.’
Qur’an orders:
‘Wala tankihoo almushrikaati hatta yuminn. walaamatun muminatun khayrun min mushrikatin walaw aAAjabatkum
‘Wed not Al Mushrikaat, till they believe; for lo! a believing bondwoman is better than Mushrikaat, though she please you.’
—Al Qur’an Al Kareem: 2 Al Baqarah: 221
Hinduism/Ved says:
‘Marry them. If you can’t convert them to nobility, and to humanity even, never allow their evil to pass on to their offspring at least.
That’s why it is called ‘Gr’hasth ASHRAM‘.
A sacred hut of severity where the Sukr’t/noble doer exerts his every possible effort to make his women and offspring human beings, nobles and divine; gradually and eventually ultimately.
An Ashram in Hinduism is a hut where the saints live in doing welfare to the entire humanity, irrespective of the castes and creeds of the persons.
It is the endless movement of Hinduism:
‘Vi tishthantaam maaturayaa upasthaannaanaaroopaa
pashavo jaay’maanaah,
sumangalyup seedemamagnim sampatnee pratibhoosheh devaan‘
‘Let there come forth, from the genital organ of this mother, animals of various forms, being born; Benevolent female! sit near/worship this Agni/the man who leads to light. Proper wife, ornamentize divine ones here properly.’
—Ved: 4 Atharv Ved| 14|2|25
The future and present both, of the entire womankind, and the entire humankind eventually, are thus protected by Hinduism/ Ved skillfully.
Elsewhere, this movement is termed ‘Kr’n’vanto vishvamaaryam‘ by Ved/ Eishan Param Brhm Parmatma Himself:
‘Été asr’gramāshavo’ti hvarānsi babhravah,
Somā r’tasý dhārayā.
Indram vardhanto apturah Kr’ñvanto vishvamāryam,
Apaghnanto arāvñah.’
‘These Swift flowing tawny colored Som, with a stream of eternal truth, let loose/proceed, augmenting Indr, urging the utmost beautiful young girls and ladies,making all better, destroying the withholders.’
—Ved: 1 R’gved: 9|63|4-5
It is called the Marriage Policy of the Hindus.
The Bachhalyas/Vats people professed it to its optimum.
The Dvijs also professed it and made Hinduism benevolent to the entire womankind and to the entire humankind thus in its due course, peacefully, without any violence whatsoever, at all.
It is to be noted that out of the holy wars, Dharm Yuddhs, Hinduism has fought for its own survival, most of them were for the protection of fundamental human rights of womankind.
Even the universally famous war of Mahā Bhārat was fought because the wicked ones degraded a woman.
One more universally famous war of Lord Rām and Rāvañ had the same reason previously.
If we peruse the Hindu history in detail, we find to our incredible surprise that Hindus almost never fought for any vile purposes or for their own selfishness.
Even then whenever any non Hindu girl/woman married a Hindu male, the non Hindu society always took it as an insult, a humiliation, to it.
No non Hindu society ever took it as a matter of her fundamental human rights.
The society’s own self conceived and self decided pride was more important for such non Hindu societies than the fundamental human rights of its women.
They wanted their womankind must sacrifice, their fundamental human rights even, to safeguard the self conceived and self decided pride of the society in question.
Therefore, such non Hindu societies always took pride in even Honor Killings instead of granting their womankind their fundamental human rights.
It was doubtlessly a sheer idiocy on the part of such non Hindu societies.
Yet, in their immense ignorance, they made it the question of their own cultural survival.
They practiced Endogamy.
Hinduism never interfered in their cultural freedom.
But it could not allow the non Hindu societies to dictate Hinduism it has also to practice Endogamy.
Because of its own mission of existence, Kr’ñvanto vishvamāryam’, ‘Imām nārīm sukr’té dadhāt’; Hinduism could not, and can never, practice Endogamy.
Endogamy mars its mission of existence itself.
Naturally, Hinduism had, and has, to fight with such non Hindu societies that were not formed on the principle of ‘Live and let live’.
They were formed on the principle of ‘Live and let die’.
Rāxas, Dānav, Daitý, Asur were such non Hindu societies Hinduism had to fight with.
Hinduism never attacked them.
But they never allowed Hinduism to lead its life on its own principles.
They fought for their right of cultural survival.
But they were adamant not to allow Hinduism its own cultural survival.
It was natural for Hinduism not to surrender to the dictatorship of such foolish and grossly unjust non Hindu societies.
It fought with them and survived.
I don’t know what was wrong in it.
Shouldn’t one protect the fundamental human rights of womankind?
Shouldn’t one fight for its own survival if it’s threatened unjustifiably?
Why does Ved support Polygamy?
Indro nirjyotishā tamso gā aduxat
————————————————————————————
1. More On Hinduism
2. On Islam
3. On History
4. Commentary on Ved
5. Science Fiction
6. Creative Adult Sex in English from Durgesh
7. Durgesh in Hindi/Urdu
———————————————————
More on Hinduism from DSM Satyarthi:
5. ‘According to facts’: ‘Yaathaatathyatah’
——————————————————————————————————————–-
More on Islam from DSM Sayarthi:
1. Bal huv qur’anum majeedun fe LAUHIM MAHFOOZIN
Commentary on Ved from DSM Satyarthi:
1. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 1| Mantr 1
2. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 1| Mantr 2
3. R’gved: Mandal 2| Sookt 1| Mantr 1
4. R’gved: Mandal 3| Sookt 1| Mantr 1
5. R’gved: Mandal 4| Sookt 1| Mantr 1
6. R’gved: Mandal 5| Sookt 1| Mantr 1
7. R’gved: Mandal 6| Sookt 1| Mantr 1
8. R’gved: Mandal 7| Sookt 1| Mantr 1
9. R’gved: Mandal 8| Sookt 1| Mantr 1
10. R’gved: Mandal 9| Sookt 1| Mantr 1
11. R’gved: Mandal 10| Sookt 1| Mantr 1
12. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 1| Mantr 1
13. Saamved: Mantr 1
14. Atharv Ved: Kaand 1| Sookt 1| Mantr 1
Hinduism according to Ved: DSM Satyarthi 