Ved: Ved Bhāshý: R’gved: Mandal 1: Sūkt 33: Mantr 1

Jun5 by Durgesh

Ved: 1 R’gved:

Mandal 1| Sūkt 33|Mantr 1

Ashŧak 1| Adhyāý 3| Anuvāk 1| Varg 1

DSM Satyarthi

————————————————————————————————-

Étāyāmop gavyant indramasmākam su pramatim vāvr’dhāti.

Anāmr’ñah kuvidādasý rāyo gavām kétam paramāvarjaté nah.

————————————————————————————————-

——————————————————————————————–

¹Come on², let’s reach³ the man making love to women on their fours⁴, by worship⁵, the controller of organs⁶. Enhances Our beautiful proper wisdom⁷, optimum⁸.

Violence less⁹, various¹⁰, then¹¹, this one’s wealths are¹².

Prohibits the second knowledge of the women on her fours¹³; optimum¹⁴ for Us¹⁵.

————————————————————————————————

1.R’shi: Hirañyastūp Mahimvat Āngiras

Dévtā/Divine Subject: Indr, the controller of organs/Ātmā, Soul.

Chhand/Meter: Nichr’t Trishŧup

2. ‘Ā it’ in original text.

Don’t go away.

Generally the people think that sex doesn’t have any relation whatsoever with any religion.

Consequently, they try to keep away from every religion whatsoever that preaches them anything about sex.

This attitude is quite correct until the people are not wise and adult.

But, this attitude is quite wrong if the people are wise and adults.

If the wise and adult people run away from sex, the sex would be exclusive territory of the unwise people.

Wouldn’t it be harmful to entire humankind?

Think keeping your mind cool and unemotional.

‘Imām nārīm Sukr’té dadhāt.’

3. ‘Ayām’ in original text.

4. ‘Gavyantah’ in original text.

It does not mean that sex must be performed only when the women are on their fours.

It means only that generally the Ummihātul Kāýnāt are on their fours because it suits them more.

‘Let’s reach the man making love to women on their fours’ ‘ayām gavyantah’ means even sex must not be unenlightened from Our guidance.

Sex is not an irresponsible act.

It is a serious matter of life and death.

A Sukr’t’ can’t take sex as lightly as the dushkr’ts do.

Never forget that sex is for consecration only, not for anything else.

It is the fundamental difference between Our Guidance/ Hinduism and Vr’tratv.

Vr’tratv says Sex doesn’t have any relation with any kind of consecration whatsoever.

Hinduism/Ved announces boldly, scientifically and mathematically that sex is for consecration only, and for nothing else.

Until and unless this basic concept of humankind about sex doesn’t change, their endless journey to Humanity leading to Divinity even doesn’t start quite.

They are still biped animals, nothing else.

Only the principle that sex is for consecration only, generates responsibility in humankind.

It is necessary, fundamentally, for humankind that they must be responsible first, to start a family.

If not both of them, at least one of them must necessarily be a responsible person deliberately, purposely, intentionally, consciously, calculatingly, knowingly, purposefully, and stubbornly.

It’s the responsibility actually that differentiates between an animal and a human being.

Humankind is always expected to be responsible and act responsibly.

The animals are excused if they don’t act responsibly.

Hinduism/Ved declares it the fundamental difference between an animal and a human being.

A person that doesn’t think s/he is responsible for anything, whatsoever, is still an animal in the eyes of Hinduism/Ved.

Pashvo Jāýmānāh.

His/her primary need is education/Stavan to teach him/her that s/he isn’t an animal any more.

S/he is now a responsible human being.

S/he now can’t act as irresponsibly as the animals can/do.

In his/her evolution process, s/he has evolved now beyond an animal.

Now s/he can be entrusted to start a responsible family.

It is the fundamental beginning of a human civilization.

The more a person is responsible/acts responsibly, the more human s/he is.

The more irresponsible s/he is, the more s/he is devoid of humanity.

Consequently, s/he can’t be allowed to move freely in a responsible human society.

The society sends him/her to jail.

Once you understand this basic principle of differentiating between an animal and a human being, it becomes easier to you to understand Hinduism/Ved.

The Responsibility is the fundamental difference that differentiates between an animal and a human being.

The persons, who hide their animal inside them keeping the same alive, are called the Vr’tr, one who hides, in Hinduism/Ved.

The persons, who are brave enough to detect the animal inside them and deliberately produce themselves to evolve further, are called Ārý, the better.

‘Let’s reach the man making love to women on their fours, by worship’ ‘Up gavyantah’.

A particular man has been identified here, to be reached with Eīshān Param Brahm Paramātmā.

It means we can’t reach that particular man without the proper guidance from Eīshān Param Brahm Paramātmā.

The persons who are atheists can’t reach him ever.

The man can be reached optimum only by worshiping Eīshān Param Brahm Paramātmā, by none other way else.

Eīshān Param Brahm Paramātmā has locked all the rest of the ways to reach the man optimum.

Why?

Because Eīshān Param Brahm Paramātmā doesn’t want the irresponsible persons to survive in His eternal system on the responsible ones.

To reach that particular man is itself a bounty of Eīshān Param Brahm Paramātmā.

It needs eligibility to reach that particular man.

That’s why Lord Bhagvān Rām has said,

‘Sanmukh hoi jīv mohi jabhīn,

janmkoŧi agh nāshahin tab hīn.’

‘A life form can come in my contact only, when his/her sins of hundred millions reincarnations are destroyed already.’

─ Shrī Rāmcharit Mānas

If a person is in contact with an Ācharañ Nāyak and he claims proudly that s/he doesn’t think him an Ācharañ Nāyak, it means after the destruction of his/her sins of hundred millions reincarnations, s/he has gained some new sins afresh that are new obstacles now in the pathway of getting benefited through an Ācharañ Nāyak, directly.

It’s never a matter of concern for an Ācharañ Nāyak.

It’s a matter of concern for that childish person himself/herself that, doesn’t even realize what s/he has already lost and what s/he is losing more still now.

His/her guardians/friends must pay attention to the situation if s/he isn’t doing it in his/her immense childish ignorance.

The only way, in Our eternal system to survive and reach this particular man is to worship Eīshān Param Brahm Paramātmā, none else.

The man is described here by his symptoms so that one can recognize him properly:

‘He is making love to women on their fours’ ‘gavyantah’

‘Making love’ ‘gavyantah’ Present continuous.

The action is never discontinued.

That’s what Shatpath Brāhmañ describes:

‘Chakār sukhsambhogam yāvadvai Brahmaño dinam.’

‘Made love until a Brāhm-day’.

5. ‘Up’ in original text.

The man we reach is not making love to women on their fours for his own pleasure/ Children.

He is doing it to worship Us.

6. He is not an ordinary man who is doing it to satisfy his animal lust.

‘Indr’ is not a divine entity here, as the anti Hindus claim to be.

‘Indr’, ‘Agni’ and ‘Som’ are actually qualitative status according to Ved, Samhitās, Brāhmañ Granths, Ārañyaks, Upnishads, Nighanŧu, Nirukt and Vedic Grammar.

Now, it depends on you what meanings of these words you accept.

If you believe that foreign scholars of Ved are more honest to you than even the persons who gave you Ved, Samhitās, Brāhmañ Granths, Ārañyaks, Upnishads, Nighanŧu, Nirukt and Vedic Grammar, you are free to accept their views that all these Vedic terms mean only the names of different divine beings.

This commentary of Ved is then not for you.

It believes that the foreign scholars of Ved were either not honest to us, or they are themselves mistaken.

In both the cases, they are not worthy to be followed.

Knowingly or unknowingly actually they are serving their foreign masters.

They are not honest, either knowingly or unknowingly.

Moreover, even if you accept the meaning of these Vedic terms as it is explained in Ved, Samhitās, Brāhmañ Granths, Ārañyaks, Upnishads, Nighanŧu, Nirukt and Vedic Grammar, it is not enough.

You may be ‘Ārý’, a better person, if you accept it, but not ‘Indr’.

‘Indr’ is the next status of an ‘Ārý’, a better person.

You can be a member of Hindu society if you are an ‘Ārý’, a better person.

Nevertheless, you should never forget that a Hindu society is not a society of better persons only.

It is a society of Sukr’ts too.

It is a movement actually that is endless.

To join this movement it’s not enough to be an ‘Ārý’, a better person only.

A Hindu society is actually a progressive society.

To be an ‘Ārý’, a better person, is only its first stage.

The second stage is ‘Indr’.

The third stage is ‘Agni’.

The fourth stage is ‘Som’.

Until and unless you are not an ‘Indr’, you are not progressive.

According to Hinduism/Ved, you are not an active member of the movement of ‘Kr’ñvanto Vishvamāryam’ until you not control your organs.

It’s not enough for you to praise the system We have established in Our infinite creations.

If it was so easy, the wickeds are not such a fool that they can’t even praise the System.

The problem they have is actually to follow it.

That is what the wickeds can’t do.

If you are also an ‘Ārý’, a better person, you praise Our System, but do not follow it, think with cool mind, actually what the difference is there between a Vr’tr and you.

Isn’t it only that you verbally accept and praise Our System, while a Vr’tr doesn’t?

You can say that you follow Trishapt, while a Vr’tr doesn’t.

But analyze yourself.

Do you really follow Trishapt?

Find out whether you are not one of them who claim that they follow Trishapt, but actually, they only say verbally that Trishapt is right and must be followed.

If you really follow Trishapt, how can you tolerate to control your organs indefinitely?

How can you tolerate to be ‘Indr’ indefinitely?

7. The wisdom We have given you through Ved, is beautiful, ‘Su pramatim’.

Try to understand it.

If you don’t need it, don’t act among Our obedients as if you need it.

Why do you deceive them when they never deceive you?

If you are not one of them tell them so honestly.

If you don’t want to be an ‘Indr’, tell Our obedients so.

Don’t waste your and their time.

And if you really want to be an ‘Indr’, act accordingly.

Don’t tolerate it indefinitely.

Tomorrow never comes.

Scrutinize yourselves.

For how many days you are tolerating to be an ‘Indr’.

If you really want to control your organs, do it honestly.

You can’t participate in Our movement if you don’t control your organs.

It’s not enough to be a well-wisher.

Doubtlessly, a well-wisher is better than a person who can’t even wish well to others.

But it’s not enough to run Our movement, Kr’ñvanto Vishvamāryam.

It’s enough if you don’t want to fulfill your mission of life/existence.

But then you must accept that you are not sincere even to the Trishapt.

According to Hinduism/Ved your mission of life/existence, Kr’ñvanto Vishvamāryam, is an integral part of Trishapt.

Moreover, the Trishapt is the minimum qualification for Hindutv according to Ved.

How can you neglect your mission of life/existence, Kr’ñvanto Vishvamāryam, and can still call yourself a Hindu?

How can you tolerate to be an ‘Indr’, if you are really sincere to your mission of life/existence, Kr’ñvanto Vishvamāryam?

Our movement, Kr’ñvanto Vishvamāryam, is not an ordinary physical movement only.

Your hereafter does also depend on it.

If you don’t believe in hereafter you must say so honestly.

If you are not sincere even to Trishapt, announce so bravely.

Never waste your time in the things you don’t believe sincerely.

But if you really believe in Trishapt, if you really believe in the life hereafter, be sincere to it.

None has achieved anything till now half-heartedly anywhere.

If you are half hearted to Hinduism/Ved Trishapt, say so.

Don’t deceive others that you are sincere to Hinduism/Ved, Trishapt, if you are not.

We have given you complete freedom whether to accept it or not.

Then why do you act dishonestly?

If there isn’t any Eīshān Param Brahm Paramātmā according to you, be brave and say so.

But if you really believe that there is an Eīshān Param Brahm Paramātmā, act accordingly.

Don’t behave like a confused person.

8. ‘Pr’ vāvr’dhāti’ in original text.

It was enough to say that ‘when we reach the man making love to women on their fours, by worship, the controller of organs, it enhances Our beautiful proper wisdom^’‘ayāmop gavyant indramasmākam su matim vavr’dhāti’.

But such is not the case.

The verb is adverbed by ‘pr’ and it is further intensified by making ‘v’ of ‘vavr’dhāti’ dīrgh, emphasized.

The persons, who do not believe that Ved is a revealed Book, say that it is done to balance the Chhand/Meter used in the Mantr.

But for the persons who believe that Ved is a revealed Book, it is troublesome to digest that the almighty Eīshān Param Brahm Paramātmā could not balance the Chhand/Meter used in the Mantr, without adding and emphasizing some unnecessary letters.

So, I think, being one of such persons, these letters and emphasis is actually not unnecessary here as the anti Hindus claim.

Instead, it means the intensification of the Verb, presently optimum.

9. It is believed generally, and publicized by the wickeds very much that a religionist doesn’t have either money or at least optimum money.

This Manr contradicts such superstitions.

‘Anāmr’ñah asý rāyo’ ‘his wealths are violence less’ means ‘the man making love to women on their fours⁴, by worship⁵, the controller of organs’ is not wealthless.

His control of organs, his ‘Indratv’, doesn’t make him poor.

He doesn’t have wealth only, he has wealths instead, in plural.

However, Ved is not guaranteeing here the wealths for every religionist.

It depends on how much true religionist the person concerned is.

Here the conditions for his wealths are:

He must not hate sex/women.

The women are also made by Us.

How can you believe that We have made women unnecessarily?

Aren’t women/sex is essential to keep the humankind in existence?

2. He must control his organs, ‘Indr’.

In the system, We have established in Our infinite creations, it is not possible for an anindr, a person who doesn’t control his/her organs to have wealths.

That’s why the historical Russian Communist economic system broke down ultimately while it was promised by the persons leading it that it wouldn’t break down ever.

It broke down in 72 years only.

That’s why the western economic system is also breaking down fast.

Actually all the Vr’tr economic systems are bound to break down sooner or later.

They can’t survive long.

The main principle for economic survival is actually:

‘Shathast samāhar, sahasrhast sam kir.’

‘Hundred handed one, bring optimum.

Thousand handed one, distribute optimum.’

—Ved: 4 Atharv Ved: 3|24|5

Paippalād Samhitā 19| 38| 7.

10. ‘Kuvit’ in original text.

According to Nighanŧu 3:1 ‘Kuvit’ means

‘Bahu’, ‘so many.

The wealths an ‘Indr’, a controller of organs, gets thus, are so many, plenty of them.

It doesn’t make any difference whether a controller of organs is a born Hindu, a born Musalmān, a born Christian, a born Jew or a born atheist.

If he is principally an Ārý, a better person now, and if he is an Indr, a controller of organs, none can stop him/her from getting these so many violence less wealths, ‘anāmr’ñah kuvit asý rāyah’.

Hinduism doesn’t differentiate among born persons.

Its basic teaching is:

‘Vitishŧhantām māturasyā upasthānnānārūpā pashavo jāýmānāh.

Sumangalyup sīdémamagnim sampatnī pratibhūshéh dévān.’

‘Let there come forth from the genital organ of this mother, animals of various forms, being born.

Well doing woman, sit by the man leading to light. Proper wife, ornamentize here the divine ones.’

—Ved: 4 Atharv Ved 14|2|25

It believes that any child, whether s/he is a born Hindu, a born Musalmān, a born Christian, a born Jew or a born atheist, he/she is an animal, basically, by birth.

Some of them have divine tendencies by birth and some of them don’t.

Hinduism/Ved suggests Brahmcharý Āshram for all of them.

It doesn’t make any difference whether they have divine tendencies, basically, or not.

It is the reason why we find Rām, Rāvañ, Duryodhan, Arjun, all were taught under the same syllabus and same discipline.

It is the reason why Rāvañ was a Chaturved Bhāshýkār, a commentator of the entire four Vedas.

11. ‘Āt’ in original text.

When we reach³ the man making love to women on their fours⁴, by worship⁵, the controller of organs⁶. And when it enhances Our beautiful proper wisdom⁷, optimum⁸.

Only then, ‘Āt’, he gets these violence less plenty of wealths, ‘anāmr’ñah kuvidādasý rāyo’.

Otherwise, he doesn’t ever.

Everyone can see thus that the wealths promised here are not unconditional.

Instead, they are conditional absolutely.

One can’t play game with this system, even if he/she wants to.

12. He does not have to resort to violence for these wealths, and they are not insufficient too.

They are plenty instead.

13. ‘Gavām kétam param ā’varjaté’.

This is not the first knowledge.

It is second knowledge for the offsprings.

‘Anuvratah pituh putro mātrā bhavatu sammanāh.

Jāyā patyé madhumatīm vācham vadatu shantivām.’

^‘Son submit to the father, like hearted be with the mother. The wife speak in a sweet, peace giving, voice to the husband.’

—Ved: 4 Atharv Ved: 3| 30| 2

Even the knowledge of the mothers is not prohited entirely, if the mothers are non Hindus..

It is called the second knowledge ‘‘Gavām kétam param’ and it is prohibited optimum only, not absolutely.

The portions of this second knowledge ‘‘Gavām kétam param’, not in conflict with the first knowledge; can be taught to the offsprings with optimum explanation of its place in the system.

14. ‘ā’varjaté’ ‘he prohibits optimum’.

This optimum prohibition is entrusted to the Sukr’t father.

It is to be noticed that even he is not allowed the absolute prohibition of the second knowledge of the mothers, ‘gavām kétam param ā’varjaté’, even if the mothers are non-Hindus.

Hinduism/Ved is not afraid of even nescience.

It says:

‘Vidyām chāvidyām ch’ yastdvédobhayagvong sah, avidyayā mr’tyum tīrtvā vidyayāmr’tamashnuté.’

‘Science and nescience who knows both simultaneously, by nescience crossing death, by science attains Eternity.’

—Ved: 2 Yajurvéd 40| 14

15. ‘Nah’ for Us’, for Our movement, ‘Kr’ñvanto Vishvamāryam’.

‘Imām nārīm sukr’té dadhāt.’

R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 33| Mantr 2

—————————————————————————————-
More Commentary on Ved from DSM Satyarthi:

1. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

2. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 1| Mantr 2

3. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 5| Mantr 3