The mental slavery of the English-educated Indians
The westerners, and their blind Indian followers, say:
‘Vedic Sanskrit is an Old Indic language. It is the language of the Vedas, the oldest shruti texts of Hinduism, compiled over the period of the mid 2nd to mid 1st millennium BC. It is an archaic form of Sanskrit, an early descendant of Proto-Indo-Iranian. It is closely related to Avestan, the oldest preserved Iranian language.’
This erroneous view creates a confusion.
It does not support the traditional Indian view that the Ved is the everfirst source of knowledge.
Every ancient Indian literature, without even a single exception, claims it to be a fact.
Even Judaism, Christianity, and Islam support this basic view of Hinduism.
They may differ in the view that particularly Ved is the everfirst book from God or not, but they all do agree that there was such a book present, however.
Therefore, this erroneous westerner view is entirely baseless.
It was devised only for the then British Government to help it to rule over Indians.
Thomas Babington Macaulay, the unfortunate one who had to see the great Indian Revolution of 1857, before he died, actually causing his death and shattering his communal dreams, proposed it initially:
“It is impossible for us, with our limited means, to attempt to educate the body of the people. We must at present do our best to form a class who may be interpreters between us and the millions whom we govern; a class of persons, Indian in blood and colour, but English in taste, in opinions, in morals, and in intellect. To that class we may leave it to refine the vernacular dialects of the country, to enrich those dialects with terms of science borrowed from the Western nomenclature, and to render them by degrees fit vehicles for conveying knowledge to the great mass of the population.
Unfortunately, the mental slavery to the British, is still continued in some of the English educated Indians.
Not only the so called Traditional Hindus are affected with this intoxicating disease, the Muslims are also not far behind.
They are not mentally free even yet.
Moreover, they don’t want to be.
Their mental slavery, to the foreigners, has gone to the extent that they have lost even their faith in Indians.
They can’t believe now that any Indian can have/develop more wisdom than the foreigners.
They always try to dishonor such Indians who try/claim to outwit any foreigner.
They forget the fact that even Indians have received Nobel Prize for their supremacy.
They are perfect slaves yet they still want to rule/lead the Indians.
We can sympathize with the slaves, but only the slaves can accept their leadership.
They follow everything the westerners say blindly.
They have not investigated the facts themselves, and therefore, as such, they lose credit, at all, among the persons who follow the principles of ‘Dhiyo yo nah prachodayaat‘ and ‘Yaathaatathyatah‘.
They want the others to believe that Indian Aary’s are not Indians originally.
They came from Iran.
The Iranian culture was such a strong culture that it won India gradually ultimately.
We can understand why British devised this nonsense.
They had their vested vile political interests.
The question is why the English Educated Idiot Indians still support it?
No reason except their mental slavery.
It is unfortunate for them that the subsequent developments and historical events don’t support this communal, wicked, and unjust theory.
Only the blind persons can believe that Persian culture, which proved to be so incapable that it could not protect its own homeland, was stronger than Hinduism ever, that is still immortal, and influencing the ultra modern thoughts and societies even.
The same Islam, which conquered Iran and converted the entire country successfully, tried to conquer India and Hinduism as well.
What could it achieve?
Only a nominal piece of land called Pakistan.
And even that is breaking into fragments like Bangla Desh that is more Hindu than Muslim in its thinking and ideology.
In fact it revolted against Pakistan, ab initio, to retain the values those are more Hindu rather than Muslim, that’s why India supported its revolution openly.
India is still India.
Hindus are still Hindus.
But Iran is not Persian now, as it was once.
Iran is an Islamic country now.
Most of the Persians are now converted Musalmīn.
What does it prove?
The Persian Culture was better and stronger than Hinduism?
The more plausible and credible theory is, that this entire nonsense is only a frustrated anti Hindu propaganda, nothing else; not even worthy to be noticed gravely.
The Hindus must always remember the admonition from Ved/Eishan Param Brahm Paramatma:
‘Maa va’ sten eishat maaghshagvanso’.
1. Commentary on Ved
2. More On Hinduism
3. On Islam
4. On History
5. Science Fiction
6. Creative Adult Sex in English from Durgesh
7. Durgesh in Hindi/Urdu
More on Hinduism from DSM Satyarthi:
5. ‘According to facts’: ‘Yaathaatathyatah’
More on Islam from DSM Sayarthi:
1. Bal huv qur’anum majeedun fe LAUHIM MAHFOOZIN
Commentary on Ved from DSM Satyarthi:
1. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 1| Mantr 1
2. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 1| Mantr 2
3. R’gved: Mandal 2| Sookt 1| Mantr 1
4. R’gved: Mandal 3| Sookt 1| Mantr 1
5. R’gved: Mandal 4| Sookt 1| Mantr 1
6. R’gved: Mandal 5| Sookt 1| Mantr 1
7. R’gved: Mandal 6| Sookt 1| Mantr 1
8. R’gved: Mandal 7| Sookt 1| Mantr 1
9. R’gved: Mandal 8| Sookt 1| Mantr 1
10. R’gved: Mandal 9| Sookt 1| Mantr 1
11. R’gved: Mandal 10| Sookt 1| Mantr 1
12. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 1| Mantr 1
13. Saamved: Mantr 1
14. Atharv Ved: Kaand 1| Sookt 1| Mantr 1