Mandal 9|Sookt 63| Mantr 4-5
Été asr’gramāshavo’ti hvarānsi babhravah,
somā r’tasý dhārayā.4
Indram vardhanto apturah ‘Kr’ñvanto Vishvamāryam
1These Swift flowing tawny colored Somās2, with a stream of eternal truth3, let loose/proceed4,4 augmenting Indr5, urging the utmost beautiful young girls and ladies6, making all better7, destroying the withholders85.
1. R’shi: Nidhruvi Mahimvat Kāshyap
Dévtā: Pavmān Som
2. ‘Babhravah Somā’ in original text.
Due to Communal Nationalism, it’s advertised very much that the whites/blacks have more sex in their bodies than the rest of the others.
This Mantr contradicts this much-publicized popular belief.
It’s one thing a belief to be popular.
It’s quite another thing that that popular belief maybe a scientific fact too.
So many things are very much popular in different races, castes, political groups and social groups.
But all of them are not scientific facts, neither they can be.
‘Bhūrbhuvah svah. Tatsaviturvaréñýam bhargo dévasý dhīmahi dhiyo yo nah prachodayāt.’
‘The Existence, the Consciousness, the Bliss. (Vow 🙂 we meditate on that Creator of all that is Worthy to be chosen, infinitely Pure, and Divine, that impel our wisdoms.’
This basic faith separates you from the rest of the others.
You refuse to let anything/anyone, except Eīshān Param Brahm Paramātmā, impel your wisdoms while the rest of the persons don’t.
It’s advertised very much that the whites/blacks have more sex in their bodies than the rest of the others.
This Mantr contradicts this much-publicized belief.
It says as far as the color of the male body is concerned, it’s BROWN, instead of black/white that’s the utmost sexiest male body.
It is confirmed by history too.
The Dévtā, divine subject, of the Mantrs, as already told in the footnote 1, is Pavmān Som.
It means there are other kinds of Som too.
‘‘Ath saumyah. Somo rétodhāh. Mithun év réto dadhāti.’
It is the condition.
4. ‘Asr’gram’ in original text.
5. Not fighting with a person who controls his/her organ, instead augmenting, expanding him/her.
The main difference between an uncultured animal and a civilized person is that an uncultured animal does not control his/her organs in any matter whatsoever.
S/he does whatsoever s/he wants to do without thinking of its consequences.
The ultimate transgression, it has resorted to, is its non-conditional surrender to incest.
What more a society can lose to call itself uncivilized?
If even incest is a civilized practice what is uncivilized and why?
Western culture, thus, has completely surrendered to animal needs of a human being.
Why can’t it be conceived that to be a human being is not the ultimate stage of Evolution?
It’s now evident that we human beings are also a form of energy.
Then why can’t we take other forms of energy as well?
Isn’t opposing reincarnation is now totally unscientific and irrational?
Why human beings imagine divine attributes ab initio?
From where they get these imaginations if no such state as Divinity exists anywhere at all?
Unlike other religions, Hinduism does not stop its followers to love beautiful girls and women.
‘Udyachchhadhvamap raxo hanāthémām nārīm sukr’té dadhāt.
Dhātā vipashchit patimasyai vivéd bhago rājā pur étu prajānan.’
‘Stand up/Raise ye. Smite away the demons. Set this woman for well doer. Inspired holder/guardian must know especially the husband for her. The well knowing politician come first/ahead for her genital organ.’
Hinduism does not instruct its followers not to love a beautiful girl/woman.
But, it says instead:
‘Smarañam kīrtanam kélih prexañam guhyabhāñam,
Sankalpo’dhyavasāyashch’ kriyānivr’attirév ch.’
‘1To remember 2to talk about, 3playing, 4to watch, 5clandestine exchange, 6determination, 7effort, and 8ultimate act.’
Any act, out of these eight acts, constitutes sexual intercourse according to Hinduism.
If you remember someone as your sex partner, talk about; play with having the intention, watch someone, exchange clandestinely, determined to do it, do effort for it and unite in ultimate act, every step/action out of these eight, is termed sexual intercourse in Hinduism.
‘Brāhmo daivastathaivārshah prājāpatyastathāāsurah,
Gāndharvo rāxasashchaiv paishāchashchāshŧamo’dhamah.’
The persons responsible for it, thus, can’t run away from marital responsibilities anyhow.
7. ‘Kr’ñvanto Vishvamāryam’.
Though it is necessary to make all better to be Pavmān Som for it, it must never be forgotten that your Mission of life/existence is actually ‘Kr’ñvanto Vishvamāryam’ ‘Making all better’, neither ‘‘indram vardhantah’ ‘Augmenting Indr’, nor ‘Apturah’ ‘Urging the utmost beautiful young girls and ladies’6.
Never imitate/follow Musalmīn who choose the parts of Āyāt-e-Qur’ān of their own vile selfish interests and leave the rest of the Qur’ān-o-Aħādīs, for even the explanation of those parts.
They do it to justify their terrorist/selfish vile activities.
You can’t choose some things from Our System that interest you more and expect from Us/Our System, to work in your vile/selfish favor always.
You can never cheat Us/Our System. Even if you want to.
You have to take Our entire System to follow if you really want to get benefited from it.
Moreover, it is not applicable to your spouse(s)/family too that they all will be benefited from Us/Our System if only you follow Us/Our System.
Everyone of your spouse(s)/family has his/her own Karmphal/Bhogchakr.
If one could manage the Karmphal/Bhogchakr of his/her spouse(s)/family, in this way; there was no necessity of Lord Vishñu to deceive Tulsī and Vr’ndā ever.
8. ‘Apaghnanto arāvñah’.
The persons who surrender to the withholders due to any reason(s) whatsoever, can’t do Kr’ñvanto Vishvamāryam.
They may have any reason(s) whatsoever to surrender to the withholders, howsoever valid in their own eyes; nevertheless, it is a fact that Kr’ñvanto Vishvamāryam cannot be done, practically, until and unless you don’t destroy the withholders ‘Apaghnanto arāvñah’.
There isn’t a middle way between destroying the withholders ‘Apaghnanto arāvñah’ and surrendering to them.
If you don’t destroy them, they would destroy you.
Why do you think they withhold you while you don’t withhold them?
If they were really as immune to you as they claim/you think, why do they withhold you at all?
In addition, why don’t you withhold them while they withhold you?
Are you fool enough not to recognize your enemies?
Arjun acted in the same way before Mahā Bhārat.
Did Lord Kr’shñ allow him to do so?
If yes, why Shrīmad Bhagavad Gītā was preached to Arjun?
Why didn’t Lord Kr’shñ left Arjun to his own point of view?
Why did he discuss with him for such a long time?
If they were really your friends, as they/you claim, shouldn’t both of you be honest to each other mutually?
If you are honest to them but they are not honest to you, isn’t it harmful and dangerous to you and to the society of nobles, Sukr’ts, you belong to?
Yes, you can have friendship with them if they are really honest to your friendship.
But how a person can be honest to anyone who is not honest even to him/her self?
Yes, you can form even a government with Vr’trs even, as your partners.
But how can you sit satisfied with such a mixed government, for ever?
You have to make even your partners better; if you really do have your conviction to Trishapt/humanity leading to divinity.
Naturally, you can’t leave Trishapt only to join some government.
If you do it, it means your Vr’tr partners, in government, are more dedicated to their vr’tratv than you are dedicated to your Hindutv.
Isn’t it a moment for you to die of shame?
You have to decide seriously whether you want to worship Us or not.
You can’t tolerate this question indefinitely.
Sooner or later, you have to decide it.
Of course, you can prefer vr’tratv on your Hindutv.
No one is compelling you to embrace Our Hindutv.
The only thing We want from you, is to be brave and honest enough to declare to Our followers whether you are one of them or not, sincerely.
You must declare that only your father/forefathers were Hindus.
Hindus think you are one of them while you definitely are not so.
Why are you having a name, Hindu, that is such a hateful/ridiculous/ worthy to be criticized name for you?
Only because your father/forefathers had it?
But they were not hating/ridiculing/criticizing Hinduism every now and then.
Of course you can do it even your father/forefathers didn’t do it.
But you must be brave and honest enough to tell the other Hindus that such is the case, so that they should not have any favorable expectations from you.
Since a very very long time, the Hindu society is suffering heavily from its such dangerous and harmful mistake(s).
They plan to fight with anti Hindus, thinking you are one of them, while you are certainly not.
You are actually one of the withholders, arāvñah, they should get rid of and destroy ultimately if you want/plan to destroy them.
1. More Commentary on Ved
2. More On Hinduism
3. On Islam
4. On History
9. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 6
10. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 7
11. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 8
12.R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 9
40. Saamved: Mantr 1
More on Ved from DSM Satyarthi: