Ved: 1 R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 1

Ved: 1 R’gved: Mandal 1|Sookt 19| Mantr 1

DSM Satyarthi

——————————————————————————————-

Prati tyam chārumadhvaram gopīthāý pr’ hūyasé. Marudbhiragn ā gahi.

——————————————————————————————-

¹You call properly, for yourself², to that famous³ excellent⁴ violence-less⁵, for gopīth⁶. With the flippants⁷, Agni⁸, come on⁹.

——————————————————————————————

1. R’shi: Médhātithi M. Kāñv

Dévtā/Divine Subject: Agni, the one leads to light and flippants

CHHAND/METER: Gāyatriī

This sookt is widely used for the first Stavan for second birth.

Hinduism/Ved does not believe in the birth from mother.

It calls it ‘Pashu Janm’ ‘Animal birth’.

If you scrutinize a human life, you can easily appreciate the truth, and gravity of the concept.

Hinduism/Ved outright refuses to accept the concept that a person is a Hindu only because he/she is born in a Hindu household.

It insists that even the child must be brought to Hindutv with complete consciousness.

According to Hinduism a person even can’t marry without it.

It is called Dīxā, Upnayan, Pravésh/Admission to the endless grave movement of Hindutv.

One can’t join any movement by only being born to one of its members.

He/she must understand what the movement is first.

Hinduism/Ved proposes to invest the entire one-fourth life of a person to understand this movement ‘Kr’ñvanto Vishvamāryam’ properly, what it is and how to do it practically.

No movement can be more serious to explain it to its followers.

It is called ‘Brhamcharý Āshram’ in Hinduism.

Lord Ram calls the movement ‘Dharmsantānam’ and Lord Kr’shñ calls it ‘Dharmsansthāpan’ too:

‘Tasý dharmkr’tādéshā vayam anyé ch’ pārthivah,

Charāmo vasudhām kr’tsnām Dharmsantānamichchhavah.’

‘By his (Bhart’s) order of Dharm, we and the other leaders of the earth, wandering the entire earth, with the desire to spread Dharm.’

—Ārsh/Vālmīki Rāmāyañ: 4 Kishkindhā Kānd: 18|9

‘Paritrāñāý sādhūnām vināshāý ch’ dushkr’tām,

Dharmsansthāpanārthāý sambhavāmi yugé yugé.’

‘To guard the practitioners and to destroy the evil doers,

To establish Dharm properly, I exist/do appear, properly, in every era.’

—Shrīmad Bhagavad Gītā: 4|8

2. ‘Hūyasé’ in original text.

Any one, who knows even infinitesimal about Sanskr’t Grammar, can see the word is in Ātmanépad.

In laukik Sanskr’t, the Pad division of the roots, does not bear any practical difference in its sense, generally.

It’s not so in Vedic Sanskr’t.

Vedic Sanskr’t means the Pad of a root gravely.

If Ātmanépad of a root is used, it means the action is for the subject of the verb.

It can’t be used for other than oneself, in Vedic Sanskr’t.

In laukik Sanskr’t the roots themselves are divided in two ‘Pads’.

It makes the ‘Pad’ senseless.

Ask any laukik Sanskr’t grammarian why it is so.

They provide different answers, and none of them really stands to reason.

In Vedic Sanskr’t all the roots are used in both the ‘Pads’, Ātmanépad and Parasmaipad.

If Ātmanépad is used the action is for the subject of the verb him/her self.

Whereas, if Parasmaipad is used the action is for other(s).

In Vedic Sanskr’t it is a strict rule, and any translation of any text in Vedic Sanskr’t that does not follow this rule strictly, is a wrong translation.

It does not convey the sense the text writer wanted to convey.

When Vedic Sanskr’t was prevalent, there was no artificial division of verbs in Ātmanépad and Parasmaipad.

It came with the prevalence of laukik Sanskr’t.

Common people carelessly, unknowingly, used some verbs in one Pad only and some verbs in another, as they remembered them being used by learned ones.

Laukik Sanskr’t is not such a scientific language as the Vedic Sanskr’t is.

There are so many irrational grammatical laws in laukik Sanskr’t that are not scientific, natural or rational.

This weakness is not found in Vedic Sanskr’t at all.

It must never be forgotten that laukik Sanskr’t is a language used by common people, when Vedic Sanskr’t was prevalent.

The common people are not, and were never, as scientific or as rational as the learned persons are.

The common people always deviate from strict laws of any language whatsoever.

They mold it to suit their own immediate convenience, distorting the original language thus, and bringing a new language in use, gradually, unknowingly.

Vedic Sanskr’t similarly was transformed into laukik Sanskr’t by common people unknowingly.

Then similarly, the laukik Sanskr’t itself was transformed in to Apbhransh, and Prākr’t.

R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 2

———————————————————————————————————————-

More Commentary on Ved from DSM Satyarthi:

1. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

2. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 1| Mantr 2

3. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 5| Mantr 3

4. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 5| Mantr 3

5. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 7| Mantr 5

6. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 7| Mantr 8

4. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 1