Communal Muslims discuss my Muslim wife, me and my Muslim women: Durgesh

Communal Muslims discuss my

Muslim wife, me and my Muslim

women: Durgesh

Deepak Delhi India wrote on March 15, 2008:
‘Hey all u.I dont know whether they do or not,but I certainly know they(Muslim) dont like to.My girlfriend is a muslim and I know many other muslim girls through her.
I must say it might be alarming for muslims that they(most of muslim girls)think they are not given any outdoor freedom otherwise, they do not bother marrying hindu boys.’
http://www.topix.com/forum/world/pakistan/T8I…

NIZAMUDDIN Bangalore, India said:
‘I WENT TO TELL U THAT OUT OF 100 MUSLIM GIRLS ONLY 10GIRLS LIKE TO MARRY ANY TYPE OF CAST BOYS BUT NOT ALL OF THEM…. BUT WHO MARRY OTHER CAST BOY I BELIEVE THAT THEY ARE NOT TRUE MUSLIM GIRLS.’
http://www.topix.com/forum/world/pakistan/T8I…

Muxy Islamabad, Pakistan said:
‘this is all shit
nothind of this sort is prohabited
ur religion may allow to have sex with bitches.’
http://www.topix.com/forum/world/pakistan/T8I…

I said:
‘i disagree with you Mr. Nizamuddin! I’m a Hindu. My wife is a Saiyada. She taught even me what the real Islam is. Through her I love Islam more today than I was not married to her. she maintains her Panjvaqta Namazes. She practices Tilavate Qur’ano Ahadees even. I wonder, if she is not a true Muslim girl, what she is. Will you care to answer?’
http://www.topix.com/forum/world/pakistan/T8I…

I resonded further:
‘Deepak is right. The Muslimat are revolting against Muslim males in a large number now everywhere.
The astonishing fact is that they don’t only want to marry Hindu males they want Hindu males for even sex out of wedlock.
They love to have Hindu boyfriends.
The trend is continued even in modern Muslim women. Even if they are not one man women, they still want Hindu males only to have sex with. They hate Muslim males immensely and even go to the extent to calling them impotent. They want to disgrace them and love their humiliation enjoying it immensely.
I have come into contact in a large number with these Muslim Women. I find it troublesome to keep them in control for not to disgrace Muslim males. They enjoy disgracing them and even express their disapproval if I try to control them. They still try to make me even join them in disgracing Muslim males to the extent that I feel myself awkward and not justified to my conscience.
Isn’t it really a matter to alarm the Muslim males and to change themselves accordingly?’
http://www.topix.com/forum/world/pakistan/T8I…

Salman Karachi, Pakistan said:
‘Actually Hindu/Sikh girls don’t bother about marrying Muslim boys and it’s good for us my 1 cousin married a Hindu girl and other married a Sikh girl but those ladies were not true Hindu or Sikh coz they married Muslim men.
so we both have a different experiance.right!
Cheers.’
http://www.topix.com/forum/world/pakistan/T8I…

I said:
I have experienced sex with countless Muslimat of various age groups. I have love married a Saiyada. I am in constant touch with todays Muslimat. I think I know them more than even the Muslims know them. The Muslims never tried to understand them is their impression and they love me because they think I understand them more and love them as they are.’
http://www.topix.com/forum/world/pakistan/T8I…

Salman Karachi said:
‘You didn’t answer me!
If Muslim men are unable to satisfy their women or they don’t understand their women than how can they understand non-Muslim women? Since if this is the case than not a single Hindu girl should marry a Muslim.’
http://www.topix.com/forum/world/pakistan/T8I…

I said:
‘You have understood me totally wrong. Only because the forum is running with communal fools you have placed also me with them.
I’m not of the opinion that all the Muslims are impotent and all the Hindus are Kamsutr specialists.
I’ve written till now only what I’ve seen and realized.
I don’t hate Muslims or Pakistanis.
Hence I don’t need to answer you on the lines you propose.
What I write is only in general.
The Muslims also include Maulana Saiyad Abul Aala Maududi, Dr. Abul Kalam our former President, Sahir Ludhiyanvi the great poet etc. I respect these Muslims more than even the born Hindus. Naturally you can’t assume I think them impotents (nauzbillah!).
I wrote till now only what I experienced.
I don’t want the Muslims should continue to what they are alleged to be.
I want them to be capable enough to solve every problem they face.
I respect Islam, Qur’ano ahadees to the extent I read them as I read Ved. I respect Huzoor(s) very much.
I don’t know what I had written which made you to get me entirely wrong.
yes! I’m in contact with the Muslimat who hate the Muslim males altogether but at the same time they charge me that I behave as if I’m a Muslim more than as if I’m a Hindu.
So my dear friend! you can easily see why I don’t need to answer you on the lines you asked.
I do not mean that at all.
Alhamdulillah!’
http://www.topix.com/forum/world/pakistan/T8I…

I said further:
‘Please go through all my 130 comments,7936 Comments NOW. You will realize my sincerity. The communals use altogether different language.
One can’t hide love and hate altogether!’
http://www.topix.com/forum/world/pakistan/T8I…

Salman Karachi, Pakistan said:
‘Don’t get me wrong but as you have said Muslim girls attracts towards you (if they) because you act like a Muslim and not a Hindu.

If your wife is a Muslim she is no more a Muslim. This is according to the teachings of Islam I am not extremist but these are the basics which cannot be neglected.’
http://www.topix.com/forum/world/pakistan/T8I…

I responded:
‘I don’t agree with you. Sorry.
You say you are mot an extremist. Yet, you behave like one.
You say the Muslim girls are attracted to me because I act like a Muslim, but they actually charge me for it that I’m more Muslim than I’m a Hindu. They do not appreciate it. They want me to act like a Hindu. They say a Muslim cannot make love to them without proper nikah, but a Hindu can. So, I should remain Hindu. My wife is a Saiyada and is Panjvaqta Namazi. She is a PhD in Islamic Arabian Literature. In her spare times she reads Qur’ano ahadees and Tareekhe Islami. If she is not Muslim, who is Muslim? Who does not know Arabian even? Who can’t read and understand Qur’an in its original language? She did not have any sexual relations with me till we married, while the other Muslimat compel me to have sex with them. Yet they are Muslimat and my wife is not?
I am unable to understand your logic. My father in law laughed when I told him what you have written. His comment is: The average Muslims are fools. They do not know what Islam really is. Islam is not in names and exhibitions to be a Muslim. You (i.e. I) are a better Muslim than the born ones. You don’t need certificate from Muslims. Allah is enough for you. And he recited:

The Jews say that the Christians have nothing and the Christians say that the Jews have nothing of it, though both read the Scripture. And those who have no knowledge of the Scripture also make similar claims. Allah will surely give His judgment on the Day of Resurrection in all the matters in which they differ.’
Al Qur’an Al Kareem: 2 Al Baqarah:113
‘The fact is that no one has any special claim to Paradise; whoever surrenders himself to Allah in obedience and follows the Right Way, shall get his reward from his Lord: there shall be neither fear nor grief for such people.’
Al Qur’an Al Kareem: 2 Al Baqarah:112
I think my father in law is right.’
http://www.topix.com/forum/world/pakistan/T8I…

Salman Karachi, Pakistan said:
‘Sorry I don’t agree with you.
I have never said that if any Muslim girl wants sex with a non-Muslim man than she is a Muslim. Definitely if she commits such act she is out from Islam.
‘And give not (Muslim women) in marriage to idolaters until they believe [al-Baqara 221]

Therefore, it is not allowed for disbeliever to marry a Muslim woman. Allah also says,

‘They (Muslim women) are not lawful for them (the
disbelievers) nor are they (the disbeliever) lawful for them [al-Mumtahana 10]

Now what Quran says is right according to our belief.

Durgesh! I would like to talk to your Father in Law give me any email or something so that I may contact him.’
http://www.topix.com/forum/world/pakistan/T8I…

He said further:
‘I respect every religion and I fell in love with a Sindhi Hindu girl when I was in College I asked her to convert but she refused hence I could not marry her. But she did the right thing we must be on one side rather than in multiple boats.’
http://www.topix.com/forum/world/pakistan/T8I…
‘Islam is all about belief. You should appreciate the fact that Islam doesn’t allow to have sex before ‘Nikah’ don’t you think that this helps preventing ills in the society. I am sure Hinduism must have some thing like this commandment (though I don’t know much about Hinduism).

Yes! An average Muslim can’t understand Arabic but they can read the translation and I used to read the translation as I also can’t understand Arabic.’
http://www.topix.com/forum/world/pakistan/T8I…

I said:
‘I’m sorry you could not get your love. She should have accepted conversion. I think she is a looser. I don’t think she is a monotheist otherwise she would have recognized that going into depth there is no difference between Hinduism as preached in Ved and Islam as preached in Qur’an except only in some matters. These differences are there within even in a religion among its many sects.
I’m really sorry for you that you could not get your love. Did not you go to duaa? I think you could have been blessed.
My father in law does not have any email address. He has not learned even to use a computer nor he is interested.
Hinduism does not have its system belief oriented.
It is result oriented.
Average Hindu does not know what the real Hinduism is. They also follow blindly their priests as the average Muslims do. Real Islam is there in Qur’ano ahadees. Similarly real Hinduism is in Ved.’
http://www.topix.com/forum/world/pakistan/T8I…

I further said:
‘I repeat the Aayate kareema you have quoted:
‘And give not (Muslim women) in marriage to idolaters until they believe [al-Baqara 221]’

Who said I’m an idolator? You assumed it. Isn’t it? For your information my dear friend! I am not an idolator. I never worshipped any idol. I belong to a Hindu monotheist family. If you want to learn about Hindu monotheism, go to ‘DSMS’s Weblog@wordpress.com’.
https://dsms.wordpress.com/2008/01/04/ved-ved-…
https://dsms.wordpress.com/2008/02/20/ved-rgve…
https://dsms.wordpress.com/2008/09/22/ved-yaju…

The Aayate Kareema you quoted does not stop a Muslim girl to marry me.
It’s only the wrong interpretations of Islam which are being impeached everywhere not Islam.
I quote here one of my poems:
‘No differences Please!
No differences please!

No differences please! No differences please!
Not racial, not fathial, never one of these!
No gender differences even I would like ever,
If she is a woman I’ll love her, it is clever.
I will give her every right whatever I have,
If she is in trouble, I would like her to save.
If she is a Muslim I’m Hindu if so what?
Together we each other will share every thought.
Don’t try to make us fight, keep both together,
Keep us happy, you will find, nice it is ever.
Don’t make it prestige point, try to make us love,
Humanity, friends, you find overall above.
Let’s laugh to each problem,
Weeping never better,
Even we may solve them if,
We’ll work together.
Let’s try to find everything common we have,
Keep positive ourselves ever, we should behave.
Try to find differences we have lots of them,
Try what we have in common,
Plenty they are same.
Try begin with common, try begin with common
We’ll find happiness thus, we will be in heaven’

One more poem from me:
‘‘Why there are differences among us?

‘Why there are differences among us?
Everybody is making too much fuss.
If I am born in a Hindu family am I responsible for it?
If you are born in a Muslim family are you responsible for it?
If he is born in a Christian family is he responsible?
If she is born in a Jew family is she responsible?
Why can’t we intermarry if we please?
Why can’t we date each other if we please?
Are we all not descendants of Adam and Eve?
If it is not so why do you pretend to believe?
Tear up your divine books if you don’t have any faith in them.
Burn them all if you don’t need any more of them.
Stop the hypocrisy of going church every Sunday.
Stop the hypocrisy of reading Namāz five times a day.
Reciting of Mantrs in the Mandirs haven’t made you a human being if,
Shame on you that you even now claim your belief.
Ved Bible and Qur’an all teach us humanity.
Are their teachings now for you mere futility?
‘We one our nest one’ I’ve found in our divine books.
Please don’t destroy our nest allowing differences and crooks.
Follow the path of love every divine book does preach.
Prosperity and true happiness will not be then out of reach.’
http://www.topix.com/forum/world/pakistan/T8I…

Salman Karachi, Pakistan responded:
‘The bottom-line what I want to convey that Islam does not allow a marriage between a Muslim woman and non-Muslim man and if some one marries a non-Muslim than it is an individual act which should not be related with the teachings of Islam.’
http://www.topix.com/forum/world/pakistan/T8I…

I said:
‘Your bottom line does not coincide with the teachings of Al Qur’an Al Kareem. You are interpreting it communally. Get over with it my dear! Islam is not a communal religion as it has been interpreted widely by the Muslim Badshahs. They used Islam for their vested political interests. Get over with it. You are also given wisdom. Read Qur’ano ahadees yourself in their original words and interpret them yourself as they don’t clash with each other. The wrong interpretations are not representing true Islam. Huzoor(S) has not interpreted them as they are being interpreted now. Be brave man! Do justice with the great religion you are born in. Islam is for humanity not against humanity.’
http://www.topix.com/forum/world/pakistan/T8I…

Salman Karachi, Pakistan said:
‘Durgesh!
I have given you the references from Quran see the Translation below:
‘And give not (Muslim women) in marriage to idolaters until they believe’[al-Baqara 221]

‘They (Muslim women) are not lawful for them (the
disbelievers) nor are they (the disbeliever) lawful for them’[al-Mumtahana 10]

There is no interpretation required, these are clear words. There is a difference between universal truth and personal illusions and these are the basics of Islam.’
http://www.topix.com/forum/world/pakistan/T8I…

I said:
‘I have already answered your point but perhaps you have not read it carefully.
O.K. Let’s discuss the original Aayate Kareema you have resorted to:
‘Wa Laa tankihulmushrikaati’
‘Don’t marry the women who share others with Allah in their worship.’
‘Hattaa Yu’minn’
‘Until they bring Eimaan.’
‘Wa laa Tunkihul-Mushrikeen’
‘Don’t marry your women with Mushrikeen’
‘Hatta Yu’minoo’
‘Until they bring Eimaan’.
The part concerned is:
‘Wa laa Tunkihul-Mushrikeen”Hatta Yu’minoo”Don’t marry your women with Mushrikeen”Until they bring Eimaan’.
The problem is that you think any male who does not have a Muslim Arabic name is bound to be a polytheist, he cannot be a monotheist.
Qur’an puts the condition of monotheism and belief that ‘Laa ilaah illillah Muhammadurrasoolillah’. You persons go one step ahead more.
You put the condition that he must have an Arabic Muslim name also. It is not written in Qur’an. It is your interpretation.
If you still differ with it, you can give your reasons.’
http://www.topix.com/forum/world/pakistan/T8I…

Salman Karachi, Pakistan said:
‘It is not necessary that a Muslim should have a Muslim name let’s say I give you the examples of Bangladesh (East Pakistan) cricket players their names are “Rajin” and “Tushar” but they are Muslims so there is no such interpretation.’
http://www.topix.com/forum/world/pakistan/T8I…

Sidrah Bombay, India intervened:
‘Who are you to judge his wife’s faith and to decide whether or not she is Muslim? Tell me one thing frankly. How many times in a day do you offer namaz? How much of the Quran do you read daily? How often do you remember Allah SWT in your everyday life? How much of the Islamic laws and practises do you, yourself, actually follow? When it’s strictly forbidden for a Muslim to lie, do you always speak the truth? When slander and backbiting is strongly forbidden, haven’t you ever done so? Search into your own soul first and ask yourself whether you’re true to your faith, whether you’re indeed a Muslim yourself, before pointing fingers at the faith of others.’
http://www.topix.com/forum/world/pakistan/T8I…

I asked Salman:
‘Then how do you say my wife is not a Muslim?’
http://www.topix.com/forum/world/pakistan/T8I…

Sidrah said to me:
‘If, by his reasoning, your wife is not Muslim, then by the same reasoning, he is not Muslim either. He knows that, too, yet some people just cannot give up being ardent hypocrites.’
http://www.topix.com/forum/world/pakistan/T8I…

atif Lahore, Pakistan interfered:
‘ur charecter should be great under burqa. allaha sy daro dnya say nahi. i love my sisters who wear burqa. wsslaam.’
http://www.topix.com/forum/world/pakistan/T8I…

Salman Karachi, Pakistan responded:
‘I m no one to judge any one’s faith neither I m pointing figure but you both are mixing it up if you talk about me I don’t want to express but Alhamdullilah I offer prayers 5 times a day, yes not daily but I read Quran couple of times in a week its up to you if you call me a hypocrite I wont mind.
There is logical reasoning for every thing first of all why you punish a criminal? Answer is to set an example for the others so that they should not follow the footsteps of a criminal. Secondly it’s not about names it’s about beliefs Hindus believe on Idols do Muslims believe on idols? Look at above Aayats Allah says that Muslim woman can’t marry a disbeliever. Yes I would find a concrete evidence for the penalty of such acts.

I admit that I am a very weak Muslim may Allah forgive me but again I would say that if you are lying, backbiting or doing any illegal act it’s your own act your individual act and you should not say that it is allowed in Islam. do what ever you want but then if you commit a act which really disgrace Islam than you have no right to say proudly that u r a Muslim.’
http://www.topix.com/forum/world/pakistan/T8I…

I thanked Sidrah:
‘Thanks Sidra!
Salman! I wait for your Islamic answer according to Qur’ano ahadeese Muqaddasat.
I am unable how do you people decide about anybody’s Eiman and announce fatwas so boldly.’
http://www.topix.com/forum/world/pakistan/T8I…

Then I responded to Salman Karachi Pakistan:
‘Who is disgracing Islam and how? A person is claiming she is a Muslim. And she is really a better Muslim than even you are. She is a PhD in Arabic Islamic literature. You are not.
Why she did PhD in Arabic Islamic literature, if she is not a Muslim? Why she did not do it in Hinduism or atheism?
You are not a PhD in Arabic Islamic literature yet you are a Muslim and she is not? What a logic!
You yourself accept you do not pray five times a day–she does, yet, she is not a Muslim, and you are? Great!
She should pay like Benazeer paid for being a Muslim woman! Isn’t it?
These are Muslims! Dying to throw a Muslima out of Islam as if Islam is their father’s property!
Bravo!’
http://www.topix.com/forum/world/pakistan/T8I…

To Atif Lahore Pakistan, I responded:
‘Character must be great of Muslimat only. Not of Muslims! Isn’t it? Read what Sidra has written.
Islam is property of Muslim males only! They will tell Allah on Aakhirat who is Muslim and who is not!
Allah will not decide it, they will decide!
And they say they are following Qur’ano ahadees! Better than Muslimat!
What a joke!’
http://www.topix.com/forum/world/pakistan/T8I…

Then I responded to Sidrah’s comment:
‘Sidra wrote:
<quoted text>
‘Who are you to judge his wife’s faith and to decide whether or not she is Muslim? Tell me one thing frankly. How many times in a day do you offer namaz? How much of the Quran do you read daily? How often do you remember Allah SWT in your everyday life? How much of the Islamic laws and practises do you, yourself, actually follow? When it’s strictly forbidden for a Muslim to lie, do you always speak the truth? When slander and backbiting is strongly forbidden, haven’t you ever done so? Search into your own soul first and ask yourself whether you’re true to your faith, whether you’re indeed a Muslim yourself, before pointing fingers at the faith of others.’

I said:

‘She is absolutely right.
Sidra! I thank you again.’
http://www.topix.com/forum/world/pakistan/T8I…

Sidrah Bombay, India asked Salman:
‘In what way have I disgraced Islam? And in what way have you honored Islam? You, yourself, admit you are a “weak Muslim,” yet you want to place yourself on the judge’s seat and play the role of judge and executioner. I suggest you try putting your own house in order first, before pointing fingers at others.

Tell me, in what way are you better than somebody like, let’s say, Durgesh Jabalpur’s wife? The way I see it, if we take into account what he has said, she’s a much better practising Muslim than you are. The only “flaw” in her, it would seem, is that she has married a Hindu man. So, you mean to say that because of that, she is not a Muslim, and just because you have not gone through an interfaith marriage, even though you’re not steadfast in your religious practises, even though you’re a weak Muslim in your own words, you’re better off than her in every possible way? It’s ridiculous to think of it.

It’s certainly wrong to call a person that is steadfast in prayer a kaafir, and I fail to understand how you can be certain that her namaz and ibaadat are not being accepted, while yours is. What makes you think you’re better off in Allah SWT’s eyes than her? But of course, you haven’t married a kaafir, and that does make you superior to others like her, doesn’t it? That too, even if you’re far behind her in regular prayer.

If you’re really so bothered about instances like this, perhaps you should start asking yourself the question as to why it’s happening, find out the cause of it, and try to eradicate that cause. I’m sure, if you searched earnestly, you’d realize why Muslim women have started opting for non-Muslim partners. Somewhere, there’s something lacking for sure, but typical of Muslim male chauvinism, rather than accept your own shortcomings, you’re obviously going to pin the blame on the girl.

All I ask for is a change in the attitudes and mindset of the Muslim males. Today, to cite just one example, a Muslim girl can rarely pass through a Muslim locality without having to undergo countless lewd gazes, at times teasing, or similar uncalled-for actions from young Muslim males. Incidentally, these men are supposed to be protectors of the girl’s honor, in accordance with Islamic texts, but more than often, these very men are at the forefront in doing and thinking otherwise. I’ve lived in Muslim localities much of my life, and I have to admit that I really feel ashamed and insecure to be walking down the streets, when I should have had a sense of total security instead in the first place. You don’t find this in other localities. Chasing girls seems to be the top priority of Muslim males nowadays. Wouldn’t it be better off if, instead, they were to change their attitudes, open up, have a decent education, put it to good use, and try to live decent, progressive lives, rather than hang around in the streets in groups doing nothing worthy?

Finally, I don’t need you to read me what I have the right to do and what I haven’t. I’m proud to be Muslim, and I always will be proud to be Muslim. It’s a feeling that comes from deep inside and, by the Grace of Allah SWT, nothing’s ever going to change that feeling.’
http://www.topix.com/forum/world/pakistan/T8I…

I responded:
‘Sidra is again absolutely right.
I thank you again, Sidra!’
http://www.topix.com/forum/world/pakistan/T8I…

sheppy New Delhi, India interfered:
‘agr yehi hai to phir tumhare saadhu sant to khule aam aurto ko chodte hai uska kya’
http://www.topix.com/forum/world/pakistan/T8I…

I asked:
‘Kis Saadhu ne, kis Sant ne, kab, kahan, khule aam ayraton ko choda?’
http://www.topix.com/forum/world/pakistan/T8I…

Salman said:
‘First of all I never said that I do not offer prayers 5 times a day! Read my post again.
Secondly a religion is a set of rules. These rules are defined and we have to obey those rules. Yes Durgesh’s wife is a PhD in Islamic studies but how can she miss such a basic rule?
It’s not me who is enforcing my decision, this is Islamic law there are some crimes for which there is less penalty and for bigger crimes there are large punishments.
It is not permissible for a Muslim woman to marry a kaafir (non-Muslim), whether he is Jewish, Christian or an idol-worshipper, because the man has authority over his wife, and it is not permissible for a kaafir to have authority over a Muslim woman.Allaah says (interpretation of the meaning):

“And give not (your daughters) in marriage to Al Mushrikoon till they believe (in Allaah Alone)”[al-Baqarah 2:221]

“And never will Allaah grant to the disbelievers a way (to triumph) over the believers”[al-Nisaa’ 4:141]

And the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said:“Islam should prevail and should not be prevailed over.”

If a Muslim woman marries a kaafir when she knows the ruling, then she is a zaaniyah (adulteress), and her punishment is the punishment for adultery. If she was ignorant of the ruling then she is excused, but they must be separated, and there is no need for a divorce because the marriage is null and void. On this basis, the Muslim woman whom Allaah has honored with Islam and her guardian must beware of that and must adhere to the limits set by Allaah, and they must feel proud of Islam. Allaah says (interpretation of the meaning):

“Those who take disbelievers for Awliyaa’(protectors or helpers or friends) instead of believers, do they seek honour, power and glory with them? Verily, then to Allaah belongs all honor, power and glory”[al-Nisaa’ 4:139]

In the end I would again say that I m no one to judge but these are the rules.Do what you want but if you are doing against the Islamic law than tell me who are you to say that look i m a Muslim and I don’t obey the rules. There are some ethical and moral values.’
http://www.topix.com/forum/world/pakistan/T8I…

Salman further said to Sidrah:
‘Sidra! You gave your decision about my being a hypocrite but you didn’t ask a single question to the person who started this thread with a title which is disgracing Muslim women.
I m really surprised!’
http://www.topix.com/forum/world/pakistan/T8I…

He went on further:
‘Those Muslim men who are chasing women and doing nothing worthy are equally responsible and we as a Muslim should be ashamed of what they are doing but should we also become the part of mob which is going against Islam shouldn’t we set a example for them to follow?

I am afraid that this is not a justification that if Muslim men are not following Islam so that women should marry non Muslims saying that since men are not educated and financially strong hence we will go against the teachings of Islam and marry non-Muslims without converting them.’
http://www.topix.com/forum/world/pakistan/T8I…

Then he said to me:
‘Durgesh!
The murder of Benazir Bhutto is a political murder. She had been the PM of Pakistan twice means you are again mistaking by relating it with Islam.’
http://www.topix.com/forum/world/pakistan/T8I…

I responded:
‘I never said the murder of Benazeer is associated with Islam. After so long discussions one after another you do not understand me even a bit.
Go thrugh all my more than 250 comments and tell me which of them is associating any wickedness with Islam. You can’t find even a single one of them.
You have again written me a Kaafir which shows you are totally unable to understand me. I’m not Mushrik nor Kafir. I’m a Hindu monotheist. I respect Qur’an, Islam, and Huzoor(s). Thank God! you are not Allah. Otherwise you would have put me into dozakh till now.
Call me Kafir if it suits you.
I only pray may God bless you with wisdom and may God raise you above Firqaparasti.
You haven’t understood Islam beyond the firqaparasti imposed on it. You haven’t any courage even. Benazeer was murdered as Raziya Sultana was. Both were killed on the name of islam but not for Islam–for the vested political interests of the murderers. They were most helpless women of the world–Muslim women–according to Dr. BR Ambedkar(Pakistan or Partttion of India).
My wife says ‘Thank Allah! we are not in Pakistan. We are in India’.’
http://www.topix.com/forum/world/pakistan/T8I…

I further responded to Salman:
‘Salman wrote:
Those Muslim men who are chasing women and doing nothing worthy are equally responsible and we as a Muslim should be ashamed of what they are doing but should we also become the part of mob which is going against Islam shouldn’t we set a example for them to follow?
I am afraid that this is not a justification that if Muslim men are not following Islam so that women should marry non Muslims saying that since men are not educated and financially strong hence we will go against the teachings of Islam and marry non-Muslims without converting them.’

I said sarcastically:
‘But they are Muslims anyway! Because they are males not females!They are serving Islam. The males will be judged by a different criteria and the females by different. This is the Islam you have understood. Thank God! It is not the real Islam full of gross injustices against the faultless persons!’
http://www.topix.com/forum/world/pakistan/T8I…

I further said:
‘I am afraid that this is not a justification that if Muslim men are not following Islam so that women should marry non Muslims saying that since men are not educated and financially strong hence we will go against the teachings of Islam and marry non-Muslims without converting them.’

What a logic! If the Muslim men are not following Islam they are still Muslim.
Great!
Quote some Aayate Kareema to the effect if you can find it.’
http://www.topix.com/forum/world/pakistan/T8I…

‘Those Muslim men who are chasing women and doing nothing worthy are equally responsible and we as a Muslim should be ashamed of what they are doing.’

that’s all. We should be ashamed of them. But we will still continue to call them Muslims and believing that they will get Jannat. After all, they are males not females.
Females will not be forgiven for anything they do and the males will be never punished for anything they do. This is the understanding of Islam you are conveying! Great!

but should we also become the part of mob which is going against Islam shouldn’t we set a example for them to follow?’
http://www.topix.com/forum/world/pakistan/T8I…

‘but should we also become the part of mob which is going against Islam shouldn’t we set a example for them to follow?’

And what is the example proposed? Call the Muslim women non Muslim?’
http://www.topix.com/forum/world/pakistan/T8I…

Sidrah responded to it:
‘They do have an example to follow – in Prophet Muhammad (SAW). If they cannot reform themselves by his example, what makes you think your setting an example is going to make any difference?

Yes, it is sort of a justification, and the Muslim male is to blame for it. Today, Muslim men occupy the lowest rungs of society – academically and financially – and the icing on the cake is their narrow way of thinking. Now, I’m not talking about the few that have succeeded in life, but the average Muslim male, in general, lacks a decent education; is financially insecure; if he is financially well off, he’s usually not educated; and you’ll find the uncultured lot in abundance. Yet, most worrying is the Muslim male’s perceptions on women, which are too narrow and restrictive, and his demeanor towards them is more or less pathetic to say the least.

Every woman desires a good life and, from my point of view, I fail to perceive what woman would be happy with a man like this. Still, I do not say that Muslim women should seek kaafir men as partners, and I certainly do not promote it, nor do I encourage it. However, that said, if a Muslim women were to do so, I wouldn’t condemn it either. Plus, she certainly wouldn’t be a kaafir to me, not unless she actually changed her faith.

Finally, let me tell you one thing. I’m married to a kaafir myself. I’ve been for the last six years. Do I regret it? Not in the least bit. I couldn’t have asked for a happier life. Yet, I practise my religion earnestly. I offer salat five times a day. I recite the Quran several times a day. I fast through the month of Ramadan. I never bow to anybody besides Allah SWT, not even my husband’s idols, and by His Grace, I never will.

There’s a lot more I can add to that list, but I do not want to send out the wrong impression that I’m trying to blow my own trumpet.

So, if somebody were to tell me, despite this, that I was a kaafir, I would definitely give that person a piece of my mind. I know I’m Muslim, as much as I’m proud to be one.’
http://www.topix.com/forum/world/pakistan/T8I…

I said:
‘Bravo Sidra! One thing out of context. My wife has thanked you for presenting her case on Internet so skillfully. And I too want to thank you for it. Please note, we both are intensely grateful to you and will remain so.’
http://www.topix.com/forum/world/pakistan/T8I…

Sidrah responded:
‘What I did, I did for myself. I wanted to send out my message, and I did. I don’t believe there’s anything for you to feel grateful about. Nevertheless, I thank you for the support you’ve shown me all along.’
http://www.topix.com/forum/world/pakistan/T8I…
http://www.topix.com/forum/world/pakistan/T8I…

I said:
‘You are a very good and lovable person. Please enlist me and my wife in your friends‘ list.’

http://www.topix.com/forum/world/pakistan/T8I…Sidrah asked:
‘What do you mean by enlisting you?’
http://www.topix.com/forum/world/pakistan/T8I…I clarified:
‘Don’t get me wrong! I mentioned my wife also! I respect you. It was nothing sinister! It was only an expression of gratitude. Forget it if you don’t like it, and sorry! if it really conveyed something sinister! I did not mean it. I’ll never mean anything sinister to a person like you.’
http://www.topix.com/forum/world/pakistan/T8I…Sidrah said:
‘Relax. I never believed it was anything sinister. I just wanted to know if by “enlisting,” you meant adding you to a messenger list or something of the sort.’
http://www.topix.com/forum/world/pakistan/T8I…I said:
‘It was and is only an offer of true friendship. You can accept or reject it.’
http://www.topix.com/forum/world/pakistan/T8I…

Sidrah said:
‘I have no issues accepting it.’
http://www.topix.com/forum/world/pakistan/T8I…

lol lingum Owings Mills, MD Double AAAA?, interfered:
‘Worship me:)’
http://www.topix.com/forum/world/pakistan/T8I…

I smiled at the idiot:
‘Only because you worship me? Sorry! You keep on. I can’t.’
http://www.topix.com/forum/world/pakistan/T8I…

Salman Karachi, Pakistan asked:
‘When did I say that those Muslim men who are going against the teachings of Islam are pious?
Let me clear this once again, if a Muslim man marries a Christian or Jew woman than it is not necessary to convert her BUT it would be better if he converts her and for any idol worshipper woman he must convert her.
But it is not allowed for Muslim women to marry any non-Muslim to marry with out converting him.And if she decides to marry a non-Muslim man than he is committing ‘Zina’(unlawful sexual relationship).
Now these are the rulings if any one doesn’t want to obey them it’s his/her headache but these are not my rules these are agreed upon Islamic rules which needs to be followed.’
http://www.topix.com/forum/world/pakistan/T8I…

I told him:
‘Agreed Political Islamic Rules.
Islam is not Politics.
Islam is Far much greater than what you are conceiving it is.
I and my wife both do not need your foolish certificate for our Eiman.
They are persons like you who are sending the Muslim women like my wife Saiyada Fatima PhD in Arabic Islamic Literature in complete loss of any expectations from Muslim males.
They don’t want to come out of Communal Political system of Islam devised by then so called Muslim Badshahs to suit their vested political interests.
The person as great as Akbar was forced to devise a new religion Dine Ilahi due to the persons like you.
You struggle to throw away even genuine Muslims even better in practice than you, till you succeed or die.
Well, keep it on.
The sophisticated Muslimat like my wife, and Sidrah, have already found the way to get rid off the persons like you.
Only because Islam was used politically for a long long time by Muslim Badshahs to suit their then vested political interests you think only that is the real Islam.
What is conversion?
Conversion of heart or conversion of appearances? Conversion of Exhibitions?
You choose second.
We choose the first.
I think me a better Hindu and a better Muslim than even you are and if you think I am a Kafir, go ahead and prepare yourself for roze mahshar where my hands will be on your collars in front of Allah and Rasoole Arabi(S) both.
‘The Jews say that the Christians have nothing and the Christians say that the Jews have nothing of it, though both read the Scripture. And those who have no knowledge of the Scripture also make similar claims. Allah will surely give His judgment on the Day of Resurrection in all the matters in which they differ.’
–Al Qur’an Al Kareem: 2 Al Baqarah: 113
‘The fact is that no one has any special claim to Paradise; whoever surrenders himself to Allah in obedience and follows the Right Way, shall get his reward from his Lord: there shall be neither fear nor grief for such people.’
–Al Qur’an Al Kareem: 2 Al Baqarah: 112
‘wala taAAthaw fee al-ardi mufsideena’
Do not spread disorder on earth.
―Al Qur’an Al Majeed 2 Al Baqarah: 60.

‘Whenever it is said to them, “Spread not disorder on the earth”, their reply is, “We only seek to put things aright”.
― Al Qur’ān Al Kareem: 2 Al Baqarah: 11
‘Beware! They do spread disorder but they realize it not.’
― Al Qur’ān Al Kareem: 2 Al Baqarah: 12′
http://www.topix.com/forum/world/pakistan/T8I…

AAAA Jeddah, Saudi Arabia said:
‘you guys always quote out of the context and spread fake information dear enemy of islam.
i repeat again can you answere the below .

“They are enveloped in darkness, in other words, are steeped in ignorance and sunk in the greatest depths of misery who worship the uncreated, eternal prakrti — the material cause of the world — in place of the All-pervading God, BUT THOSE WHO WORSHIP VISIBLE THINGS BORN OF THE PRAKRTI, such as the earth, trees, bodies (human and the like) in place of God are enveloped in still greater darkness, in other words, they are extremely foolish, fall into an awful hell of pain and sorrow, and suffer terribly for a long time.” — Yajur Veda 40:9.’
http://www.topix.com/forum/world/pakistan/T8I…

He asked further:
‘can you justify the below
LORD KRSNA MARRIES 16,000 WIVES & THEN DESTROYS HIS OWN FAMILY TO DEPOPULATE THE EARTH

Lord Krsna must be seriously lacking foresight to screw so many gopis, overpopulate the earth & then destroy his own family for weighing down the earth:

“Krsna became a householder (head of a household) in Dvaraka and married many wives, and had many sons and grandsons. In the race of the Yadus, no one was poor; everyone had many children, lived a long life, and respected Brahmins. But they were so numerous that one could not count them even in a hundred years. The terrible demons who had been slain in the battle of the gods and demons were born among men, and so at the command of Visnu the gods became incarnate in the race of Yadus to repress the demons…. When Krsna had killed the demons, and thus relieved the burden of the earth, he thought,’The earth is still overburdened by the unbearably burdensome race of the Yadus. No one else can overcome them, since they are under my protection.’… Deluded by Krsna’s power of delusion, and cursed by the Brahmins, they were all destroyed, and when his entire family had been destroyed, Krsna said,’The burden has been removed.’ ” — Srimad Bhagavatam 10:90:27-44; 11:1:1-4; 11:30:1-25.’
http://www.topix.com/forum/world/pakistan/T8I…

It was answered later on separately:
Why did Lord Kr’shn marry 16,100 Sheikhzadis?:
http://www.topix.com/forum/religion/hindu/TII…

Why does Ved support Polygamy?

http://www.topix.com/forum/religion/hindu/TL6…

AAAA went on further:
‘Durgesh, i have post some question for you but no reply , why are you running away from me. if you have any points quote with authentic REF & don’t quote out of the context like you country writer ARUN SHOURIE does. This is message from a BELIEVER.I M Servant of ALLAH.

“And do not marry Al-Mushrikaat (idolatresses) till they believe (worship Allaah Alone). And indeed a slave woman who believes is better than a (free) Mushrikah (idolatress), even though she pleases you. And give not (your daughters) in marriage to ;Mushrikoon till they believe (in Allaah Alone) and verily, a believing slave is better than a (free) Mushrik (idolater), even though he pleases you. Those (Al-Mushrikoon) invite you to the Fire, but Allaah invites (you) to Paradise and forgiveness by His Leave, and makes His Ayaat (proofs, evidences, verses, lessons, signs, revelations, etc.) clear to mankind that they may remember”
[al-Baqarah 2:221]’
http://www.topix.com/forum/world/pakistan/T8I…

AAAA said further:
‘Islam says women and men are equal not identical.

for you information we WORSHIP THE CREATOR NOT THE CREATED, when you own holy book says to you why you don’t believe.
“They are enveloped in darkness, in other words, are steeped in ignorance and sunk in the greatest depths of misery who worship the uncreated, eternal prakrti — the material cause of the world — in place of the All-pervading God, BUT THOSE WHO WORSHIP VISIBLE THINGS BORN OF THE PRAKRTI, such as the earth, trees, bodies (human and the like) in place of God are enveloped in still greater darkness, in other words, they are extremely foolish, fall into an awful hell of pain and sorrow, and suffer terribly for a long time.” — Yajur Veda 40:9.

durgesh i m having many question for you & confused muslims who are not having knowledge of islam from authentic sources.’
http://www.topix.com/forum/world/pakistan/T8I…

Then AAAA declared:
‘this is where your girls stand.
. Western society falsely claims to have uplifted women
Western talk of women’s liberalization is nothing but a disguised form of
exploitation of her body, degradation of her soul, and deprivation of her honour.
Western society claims to have ‘uplifted’ women. On the contrary it has actually
degraded them to the status of concubines, mistresses and society butterflies
who are mere tools in the hands of pleasure seekers and sex marketeers,
hidden behind the colourful screen of ‘art’ and ‘culture’.’
http://www.topix.com/forum/world/pakistan/T8I…

Salman Karachi, Pakistan said:
‘Durgesh!
You asked about conversions, you told me what is conversion; what do you think who is a Muslim? Can a Muslim worship idols? Are these rules wrong? And if you think that these rules are my interpretation provide me the Aayat or a Quranic verse where Allah said that Muslim women should marry non-Muslim men.
It’s good if you have accepted Islam but you cannot ride in 2 boats. Why don’t you condemn the title of this thread?
Individual Interpretation of a religion for satisfying your needs is always wrong.’
http://www.topix.com/forum/world/pakistan/T8I…

I replied AAAA first:
‘I have asked so many times what is your question about the Ved Mantr you quoted?
You just quote it and ask me to answer.
What is your question?
What is there you think objectionable?
Put you question and get the answer.
Since despite my repeated questions you are not putting your question on the concerned Ved Mantr, it seems you are running away from me, not me from you.
How can anyone answer your question till you don’t ask him?
You just quote the Ved Mantr and ask me to answer it.
What is there to answer?
Where is your question on the Ved Mantr?’
http://www.topix.com/forum/world/pakistan/T8I…

AAAA said:
‘the below is asked you in a simple English language not ARABIC which is our mother tongue.
“They are enveloped in darkness, in other words, are steeped in ignorance and sunk in the greatest depths of misery who worship the uncreated, eternal prakrti — the material cause of the world — in place of the All-pervading God, BUT THOSE WHO WORSHIP VISIBLE THINGS BORN OF THE PRAKRTI, such as the earth, trees, bodies (human and the like) in place of God are enveloped in still greater darkness, in other words, they are extremely foolish, fall into an awful hell of pain and sorrow, and suffer terribly for a long time.” — Yajur Veda 40:9.

WHEN IT IS CLEARLY SAID TO YOU NOT TO WORSHIP THE CREATED , WORSHIP THE CREATOR.
then why you people worship the created, i mean all the disbelievers.

this i m quoting from your holybook.

HASBI ALLAH MIN NAIMAL VAKIL’
http://www.topix.com/forum/world/pakistan/T8I…

I replied:
‘You are quite right.
Ask the idolaters why they do it.
I never did it, neither my family, nor any one of my ancestors.
I’m a monotheist Hindu.
Moreover, you have not quoted the intense Ved Mantr against idolatory.
Perhaps you even don’t know it.
I quote it here:
‘Na tasy’ pratima asti yasy’ naam mahadyashah’.
‘There is no idol of Him whose glory verily is great.’.
Yajurved 32|3
Ved does not support any idol worship. It is a later invent.
In entire vast book of Ved, idol is mentioned only once and even that in negation.
Ved is a total monotheistic Book.
In my own personal view Ved is the everfirst book of Islam, still in its undistorted original form . They have distorted its translations and interpretations to suit their vile purposes but the original grand monotheistic text is still there.
I see Ved and remember this Aayate Kareema from Al Qur’an Al Kareem:
‘Fabiayyi aala’i rabbikuma, tukazzibani?’
‘Which of the bounties of your Lord will you twain then deny?’ 55 Arrahman 13,16,18,21,23,25,28,30,32,34, 36,38,40,,42,45,47,49,51,53,55 ,57,59,61,63,65,67
69,71,73,75,77.’
http://www.topix.com/forum/world/pakistan/T8I…

I further replied:
‘I go on quoting an important Ved Mantr more.
It preaches the Oneness of God profoundly.

‘Indram mitram varuñamagnimaahurathodivyah s’ suparño garutmaan,
ekam sadvipraa bahudhaa vadantyagnim yamam matarishv&aanamahuh.’

‘They call Him Indr, Mitr; Varun’, Agni-Divine is He Suparñ, Garutmaan.
The noble persons with wisdom call One Existence in many ways. They call Agni, Yam, Maatarishvan.’
– Ved1R/1/164/46.
Should I repeat:
‘Fabiayyi aala’i rabbikuma, tukazzibani?’
‘Which of the bounties of your Lord will you twain then deny?’
Al Qur’an Al Kareem:55 Arrahman 13,16,18,21,23,25,28,30,32,34, 36,38,40,,42,45,47,49,51,53,55 ,57,59,61,63,65,67
69,71,73,75,77.’
http://www.topix.com/forum/world/pakistan/T8I…

Sidrah Bombay, India asked:
‘Can I have a word with you? Is there any way of sending a PM or something on this board?’
http://www.topix.com/forum/world/pakistan/T8I…

I responded:
‘Get my email address: satyarthi.dsm@gmail.com
You are most welcome.’
http://www.topix.com/forum/world/pakistan/T8I…

Then I responded to Salman:
‘Salman! You have asked:
‘Can a Muslim worship idols?’
My answer is:
‘No. A big no! All the idol worshipers are not Muslims whoever they are.
There is no question about it.
Moreover, according to Ved, they are not even Hindus.
Interesting!
Isn’t it?
Your next question:
‘Are these rules wrong?’
My answer:
NO!
Every law provided in Ved & Qur’an is final and supreme to me.
Your next question:
‘And if you think that these rules are my interpretation–‘
I don’t think so. You have quoted Aayaate Kareemat. It decides the matter once and for all.
Any person who accepts the authority of Qur’an can’t deny it.
I accept the authority of Qur’an. I have already told you that.
The question is who is Muslim.
You deny my and my wife’s Eiman.
I differ with you absolutely, and so my wife.
The problem lies here.
You think every interpretations of Qur’ano ahadees done by Muslim Badshahs or for them are true Islam.
We refuse to degrade Islam to the extent and as so condemn every attempt profoundly.’
http://www.topix.com/forum/world/pakistan/T8I…

‘You have written:’It’s good if you have accepted Islam but you cannot ride in 2 boats.’
No! I have not accepted Islam. I am born in it.
I was never an idolater.
I never shared anyone with the God.
I believe in profound Oneness of God right from the day I became able to understand something and it was taught to me by my father, a great monotheist Hindu.
I am not riding in two boats.
Hinduism and Islam are not two boats at all as per Ved and Qur’an. It is profound stupidity of The so called Hindus and the so called Muslims that they don’t consult their own books of God and quarrel with each other foolishly.’
http://www.topix.com/forum/world/pakistan/T8I…

Salman said:
‘Durgesh!
My friend I just want to say that I m no one to judge any one’s Iman it is a matter which must be decided by Allah. But what I have under stood after talking to you that you believe on one God but you said that you are a Hindu at the same time; but there are some other believes in Islam which differs from Hinduism so how can you say that both the religions are same?
For example Hazrat Muhammad (SAW) crushed the idols after the conquest of Macca so being a Hindu can you do this?(Again I would say don’t get me wrong and I m not giving any Muslim king example I m giving the example of Prophet Muhammad (SAW)).’
Durgesh!
My friend I just want to say that I m no one to judge any one’s Iman it is a matter which must be decided by Allah. But what I have under stood after talking to you that you believe on one God but you said that you are a Hindu at the same time; but there are some other believes in Islam which differs from Hinduism so how can you say that both the religions are same?
For example Hazrat Muhammad (SAW) crushed the idols after the conquest of Macca so being a Hindu can you do this?(Again I would say don’t get me wrong and I m not giving any Muslim king example I m giving the example of Prophet Muhammad (SAW)).
http://www.topix.com/forum/world/pakistan/T8I…

‘I think the biggest confusion you have is saying that religions are different will led to a war between religions which is wrong. We don’t need to fight on religion but at the same time religions are different which doesn’t mean that people should fight on religion.’
http://www.topix.com/forum/world/pakistan/T8I…

I replied:
‘No! I am not confused at all.
The difference of opinion arises because we don’t mean the same thing when we use the words already very much in use.
I believe the religion is what our divine books preach, not that we believe and practice.
When I use the word Hinduism I always mean what the Ved preaches, irrespective of what the so called Hindus believe, practice, or preach.
Their wishes are not Hinduism.
It is not my self devised definition of Hinduism.
Ved claims:
‘svayambhooryathatathyatoartha – nvyadadhachchhashvateebhyah samabhyah’

‘The Self Existent has constituted the values for eternal subjects forever according to facts.’
-Ved:2Y: 40/8.

Manusmr’ti supports it:
‘Vedo’khilo dharmmoolam’
‘The entire Ved is the root of Dharm.’
Manusmr’ti 2|6

‘Dharmjigyasmananam pramanam paramam Shrutih’.
‘For the persons who want to know what the Dharm is, Ved is the absolute criteria.’
Manusmr’ti 2|13

You don’t believe it.
You believe Hinduism is what you find in the practices of the so called Hindus.
It is the fundamental difference of opinion we two have between us.
Till we have this fundamental difference there will always be this or that differences between our discussions.
We will never agree with each other.
Similarly, I believe Islam is what Qur’ano ahadeese muqaddasat tell us, not what Muslims believe, do and practice.
You differ with me here also.
You believe Islam is what interpreted by the Muslim Badshahs or for them also.
I differ with you strongly and fundamentally.
It brings all the other differences between us about Islam and Muslims.
The difference of opinion will always be there as we differ in our fundamental definitions.
Sorry! but it is the actual truth.
Sorry to differ with you so profoundly.’
http://www.topix.com/forum/world/pakistan/T8I…

I went on to reply Salman:
‘Salman wrote:
Durgesh!
My friend I just want to say that I m no one to judge any one’s Iman it is a matter which must be decided by Allah. But what I have under stood after talking to you that you believe on one God but you said that you are a Hindu at the same time; but there are some other believes in Islam which differs from Hinduism so how can you say that both the religions are same?
For example Hazrat Muhammad (SAW) crushed the idols after the conquest of Macca so being a Hindu can you do this?(Again I would say don’t get me wrong and I m not giving any Muslim king example I m giving the example of Prophet Muhammad (SAW)).’

I told:
‘Again the same objection that I have already answered.
When I say I am a Hindu, I do not mean that I am an Idol worshiper.
I hate idol worship.
According to Ved Eishan Param Brahm Paramatma, i.e. the God, has no idol at all.
You find an image of idol worshiper as soon as you hear the word Hindu.
That is the trouble between us.
We don’t mean same thing by the word Hindu.
The definition of Hindu is not my self devised definition.
It is written in Sanskr’t dictionaries.
Shabd Kalpdrum states:
‘Hindurdushtnr’h prokto’naary’neetividooshakah
Saddharmpaalako Vidvan Shrautdharmparaayanah.’
‘A Hindu is the one who never compromise with a wicked. He abolishes the wicked policies. He practices the religion of existence. He is full of wisdom. He is efficient in Dharm as preached in Ved.’
The other definitions of Hindu also follow this dictionary meaning:
‘Hinsaya dooyate chittam yasy’ tadapi hinasti dushtan yah s’ Hindurityabhidheeyate.’
‘One whose conscience does not feel at ease at violence but nevertheless he kills a wicked is called a Hindu.’
You do not accept these authentic definitions of a Hindu and I am adamant that these are the only authentic definitions of a Hindu. I am Hindu according to these authentic definitions. Whenever I claim to be Hindu I always refer to these authentic definitions, not to an idolater.
You can see yourself there is nothing to associate idolatry with Hinduism in these definitions.
The rest of the answer is coninued in next box.’
http://www.topix.com/forum/world/pakistan/T8I…

AAAA interfered:
‘then you are a communist or you are living in a confused state, Make up your mind?
And whoever contradicts and opposes the Messenger (Muhammad, Peace Be
Upon Him) after the right path has been shown clearly to him, and
follows other than the believers'(Ummah/Sahaba) ways. We shall keep
him in the path he has chosen, and burn him in Hell – what an evil
destination.(Surah An-Nisaa 4:115)’
http://www.topix.com/forum/world/pakistan/T8I…

‘The name hindu is given by a muslim you can read you counrty history if you want.in the book “discovery of india”. and one of indian writer viveknanda has also mention that name ‘hindu plays a misnoma. the actual name should be “Vedantist”. the people who lived on the other side of the river Indus are called HINDUS. that is what is your country history, so make up your mind. don’t be hypocrites and think with a open Mind.’
http://www.topix.com/forum/world/pakistan/T8I…

He repeated:
‘how can you justify this?

LORD KRSNA MARRIES 16,000 WIVES & THEN DESTROYS HIS OWN FAMILY TO DEPOPULATE THE EARTH

Lord Krsna must be seriously lacking foresight to screw so many gopis, overpopulate the earth & then destroy his own family for weighing down the earth:

“Krsna became a householder (head of a household) in Dvaraka and married many wives, and had many sons and grandsons. In the race of the Yadus, no one was poor; everyone had many children, lived a long life, and respected Brahmins. But they were so numerous that one could not count them even in a hundred years. The terrible demons who had been slain in the battle of the gods and demons were born among men, and so at the command of Visnu the gods became incarnate in the race of Yadus to repress the demons…. When Krsna had killed the demons, and thus relieved the burden of the earth, he thought,’The earth is still overburdened by the unbearably burdensome race of the Yadus. No one else can overcome them, since they are under my protection.’… Deluded by Krsna’s power of delusion, and cursed by the Brahmins, they were all destroyed, and when his entire family had been destroyed, Krsna said,’The burden has been removed.’ ” — Srimad Bhagavatam 10:90:27-44; 11:1:1-4; 11:30:1-25.’
http://www.topix.com/forum/world/pakistan/T8I…

Why did Lord Kr’shn marry 16,100 Sheikhzadis?:
http://www.topix.com/forum/religion/hindu/TII…

Why does Ved support Polygamy?:
http://www.topix.com/forum/religion/hindu/TL6…

I said:
‘For example Hazrat Muhammad (SAW) crushed the idols after the conquest of Macca so being a Hindu can you do this?(Again I would say don’t get me wrong and I m not giving any Muslim king example I m giving the example of Prophet Muhammad (SAW)).

Hindu tradition differs here profoundly.
We respect what Huzoor(S) did.
He was the apostle of the God.
He did knew better what he(S) was doing.
We,the normal persons do not have any right to criticize the great revolutionist(S) of his time.
We should only try to understand what he did and why he would have done it.
Then we should follow him(S) according to Al Qur’an Al Majeed.
We do not have any right to contradict or criticize him(S).
He(S) was bestowed with Meraj. We are not.
He(S) knew more than us.
He(S)sacrificed his life fighting against evil.
Nevertheless, Hindu tradition differs here.
Mind you! I’m telling Hindu tradition! not Hinduism!
There are many persons who are adamant that every Hindu tradition is Hinduism.
I don’t.
Hindu tradition is to explain the person what the real truth is. Explain him/her everything in quite detail. But never compel him to do anything against her/his wishes.
We convince one that idol worship is not preached in Ved.
Ved preaches Meditation.
We explain what is wrong in idol worship and what is better in meditation.
Yet, the ultimate decision rests with her/him.
We do not compel anyone to change one’s faith.
We never insist.
He/she has her/his own reasoning.
We will discuss with one for years, but will never compel.
The decision must be hers/his.
It does not mean that we criticize Huzoor(s) for His(S) crushing of idols.
No! We don’t think we have any right to.
He(S) understood more what he(S) did.’
http://www.topix.com/forum/world/pakistan/T8I…

Salman Karachi, Pakistan said:
‘You don’t have to say sorry. Actually I like this conversation, any ways you said
“Similarly, I believe Islam is what Qur’ano ahadeese muqaddasat tell us, not what Muslims believe, do and practice”.

What Muslims do is according to Islam. There are things which they don’t practice (which is wrong) but Islam is not just a religion it is a complete code of life and as a Muslim you have to implement Islam in your life for example if you don’t offer prayers means that you are saying. that “ok I believe on Islam but I don’t want to offer prayers and I believe that offering prayers means that I m showing that I m a Muslim where as it is better to be a Muslim from Inside”.

Similarly if you don’t practice Hinduism that is also wrong if you are a Hindu.
About Namaz Hazrat Muhammad (SAW) said that “the only difference between a believer and a non-believer is Namaz”.’
http://www.topix.com/forum/world/pakistan/T8I…

I replied AAAA first:
‘You have written:
then you are a communist or you are living in a confused state, Make up your mind?’
I am unable to follow your reasoning!
Do you know what a communist is?
I am confident you don’t.
I am giving you a web address. Click it to know what a communist is first, then we will discuss on this point:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Communist
‘or you are living in a confused state.’
No! I am not! I am quite clear! There is no confusion at all.
My mind is already made up.
‘And whoever contradicts and opposes the Messenger (Muhammad, Peace Be
Upon Him) after the right path has been shown clearly to him.’
I am neither contradicting nor opposing Huzoor(S).
‘The Jews say that the Christians have nothing and the Christians say that the Jews have nothing of it, though both read the Scripture. And those who have no knowledge of the Scripture also make similar claims. Allah will surely give His judgment on the Day of Resurrection in all the matters in which they differ.’
Al Qur’an Al Kareem: 2 Al Baqarah: 113
‘The fact is that no one has any special claim to Paradise; whoever surrenders himself to Allah in obedience and follows the Right Way, shall get his reward from his Lord: there shall be neither fear nor grief for such people.’
Al Qur’an Al Kareem: 2 Al Baqarah: 112
‘wala ta’asaw fl-arzi mufsideen’
Do not spread disorder on earth.
Al Qur’an Al Majeed 2 Al Baqarah: 60.

‘Whenever it is said to them, “Spread not disorder on the earth”, their reply is, “We only seek to put things aright”.
Al Qur’an Al Kareem: 2 Al Baqarah: 11
‘Beware! They do spread disorder but they realize it not.’
Al Qur’an Al Kareem: 2 Al Baqarah: 12

I believe, Allah knows better, what is Islam; than you.
Sorry to differ with you altogether in the matter.’
http://www.topix.com/forum/world/pakistan/T8I…

—————————————————————————————

More on Hinduism from DSM Satyarthi:

1. ‘Bhoorbhuvah svah!’ ‘The Existence! The Consciousness! The Bliss!’

2.‘Devasy’ pashy’ kaavyam, n’ mamaar, n’ jeeryati.’

3. Hinduism shines

4.Ved is the eternal law book having infinite knowledge in it for human beings

5. ‘According to facts’: ‘Yaathaatathyatah’

6. ‘SET THIS WOMAN for WELL DOER’: ‘Imaam naareem Sukr’te dadhaat’

7. The Evernew Hinduism: Yaathaatathyatah: Ved 2|40|8

8. ‘How to cross death’: ‘Tamev viditvaati mr’tyumeti’: Ved2Yajurved|31|18

9. According to Hinduism: We must be polite, not coward

10.Ye yathaa maam prapadyante taanstathaiv bhajaamyaham: Lord Kr’shn

11. ‘Maachchhitthaa asmaallokaat’ ‘Be not severed from this world’: Ved

12. The mental slavery of the English-educated Indians

——————————————————————————————————————

More on Islam from DSM Sayarthi:

1. Bal huv qur’anum majeedun fe LAUHIM MAHFOOZIN

2. Innahu laquranun kareemun Fee kitabin maknoonin

3. ‘Hudallilmuttaqeen’: ‘Guidance for controllers of organs’: 2 Al Baqarah: 2

4. ‘Alaa qalbik litakoon minal-munzireen’ ‘upon your heart one of who to warn’

5. Muslimahs! Come to India. I recommend Hindu lovers for all the Muslimahs.: Khadeejah Muhammad

Commentary on Ved from DSM Satyarthi:

1. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

2. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 1| Mantr 2

3. R’gved: Mandal 2| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

4. R’gved: Mandal 3| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

5. R’gved: Mandal 4| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

6. R’gved: Mandal 5| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

7. R’gved: Mandal 6| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

8. R’gved: Mandal 7| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

9. R’gved: Mandal 8| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

10. R’gved: Mandal 9| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

11. R’gved: Mandal 10| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

12. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 1| Mantr 1

13. Saamved: Mantr 1

14. Atharv Ved: Kaand 1| Sookt 1| Mantr 1

‘Hudallilmuttaqeen’: ‘Guidance for controllers of organs’: 2 Al Baqarah: 2

Hudallilmuttaqeen:

Guidance for controllers of organs:

2 Al Baqarah: 2

DSM Satyarthi

We see there are some persons in the Pakistan forum Topix, names are not important, who do never understand.
I never asked them to leave Islam.
I always asked them to follow Islam.
Being Muslims, they are supposed to read Al Qur’an Al Kareem, though, from their attitude, I doubt it.

I’ve frequently repeated my post:
‘Talk of anything, he’ll go to obscenity.
Talk of his mother, he’ll go to obscenity.
Talk of his sisters, he’ll go to obscenity.
Talk of his grandmother, he’ll go to obscenity.
Talk of his great grandmother, he’ll go to obscenity.
Talk of his anything whatsoever you please, he’ll go to obscenity.

The obscenity is Calgary, Canada; Changing ID Moron’s TRUE religion.
he is expert in obscenity only.
He can’t write even a single line without it.
What a moron!
He does not know anything about Islam, Qur’ane Kareem and Ahadeese Muqaddasat.
When he is confronted with them, he runs away; and reappears when the temperature is down.
If you have courage enough to go through all his posts, it’ll be easy to find out that his commitment to obscenity is too much far greater than even his commitment to Islam.
The morons ABC, XYZ,Hindukush Raid, Jack, KBK, Shul, Leo, AAAA, Double AAAA; are unable to answer me, still now.
It should be noted.
Thus, it is proved, extensively; that according to the globally respected scholar of Islam, Maulana Saiyad Abul Aala Maududi, rahamatullah alaihi; even the door to Qur’ane Kareem, is closed to these obscene persons.
They are not Muslims, thus; they are MUNAFIQEEN.

‘V’ izāqīl lahum lā tufsidū fil årzi qālū innamā naħnu musliħūn.’
‘Whenever it is said to them, “Spread not disorder on the earth”, their reply is, “We only seek to put things aright”.

— Al Qur’an Al Kareem: 2 Al Baqarah: 11

Alā innahum humul mufsidūn v’ lākinllā yashåurūn.’
‘Beware! They do spread disorder but they realize it not.’

–Al Qur’an Al Kareem: 2 Al Baqarah: 12

Andhantamah pravishanti ye’vidyamupasate,
Tato bhooy’iv te tamo y’u viyayagvang rataah.’
‘To blinding darkness go those who make a cult of Nescience.
The devotees of the so called science enter darkness that is darker still.’

— Ved: 2 Yajurved: 2| 40|12

The stupids change their IDs.
ABC, XYZ, Let’s make them study all the 26 alphabets.
Have a nice obscene foolish dream, dirty children!’
http://www.topix.com/forum/world/pakistan/T97…

The question arises, why is it so?
Why they can’t get guidance from Qur’an, though Qur’an is quite clear in the matter?
This magnanimous Aayate Kareema answers this question efficiently.

Zaalikalkitaabu laa raib, feehi, hudallilmuttaqeen.’
‘This is ALKITAAB, no doubt, in it. Guidance for the controller of organs.’

–Al Qur’an Al Kareem: 2 Al Baqarah: 2.

The question arises: What is Al Kitaab?
Is it Qur’an itself, or some another book?

Maulana Saiyad Abul Aala Maududi, rahamatullah alaihi, answers this question in this way:

‘‘“Umm al-Kitab”: the “Original Book”: the Book from which all the Books sent down to the Prophets have been derived.

In Surah (56)AI-Waqi`ah the same thing has been described as Kitab-um-Maknun (the hidden and preserved Book) and in Surah (85)AI-Buruj 22 as Lauh-i Mahfuz (the Preserved Tablet), that is, the Tablet whose writing cannot be effaced, which is secure from every kind of interference.

By saying that the Qur’an is inscribed in Umm al-Kitab, attention has been drawn to an important truth.

Different Books had been revealed by Allah in different ages to different Prophets for the guidance of different nations in different languages, but aII these Books invited mankind to one and the same Faith: they regarded one and the same thing as the Truth; they presented one and the same criterion of good and evil; they propounded the same principles of morality and civilization; in short, they brought one and the same Din (Religion).

The reason was that their source and origin was the same, only words were different; they had the same meaning and theme which is inscribed in a Source Book with Allah, and whenever there was a need, He raised a Prophet and sent down the same meaning and subject-matter clothed in a particular diction according to the environment and occasion.

Had Allah willed to raise the Prophet Muhammad (upon whom be His peace) in another nation instead of the Arabs, He would have sent down the same Qur’an in the language of that nation.’

These are the second and third explanatory notes from Maulana Saiyad Abul Aala Maududi, rahamatullah alaihi,on these four Aayate Kareemaat:

‘Ha’. Mim. By the Clear Book; verily We have made it an Arabic Qur’an that you may understand. Indeed it is transcribed in the Original Book with Us; *2 sublime and full of wisdom*3.’

– Al Qur’an Al Kareem:43 Az Zukhruf:1-4

It’s quite clear, from above, why these obscene persons can’t get any guidance from Al Qur’an Al Kareem.
Al Qur’an Al Kareem is a guidance for the persons who control their organs.
They don’t control their organs at all.
They are not MUTTAQEEN.
Al Qur’an Al Kareem is HUDALLILMUTTAQEEN: Guidance for the controllers of organs, NOT FOR THE DIRTY ONES.

However, I don’t think these dirty and obscene persons have emerged in present Islamic society, absolutely out of whole cloth.
No.
They also have their tradition.
They also have their original dirty Arab ancestors who behaved exactly similarly with Huzoor(s) as these morons are behaving here.
Al Qur’an Al Kareem states:
‘There they shall hear no idle talk nor any sinful speech(in Jannat).*13′
-Al Qur’an Al Kareem: 56 Al-Waqi’ah:25
Maulana Saiyad Abul Aala Maududi, rahamatullah alaihi,explains it:

*13 This is one of the major blessings of Paradise, which has been mentioned at several places in the Qur’an, viz. that in Paradise human ears will remain secure against idle and frivolous talk, lying, backbiting slander, invective, boasting and bragging, taunts and mockery, satire and sarcasm. It will not be a society of foul-mouthed, indecent people who will throw mud at each other, but a society of noble and civilized people free of such frivolities. A person who has been blessed with some deceney of manner and sense by Allah can very well feel what an agony it is in worldly life a hope of deliverance from which has been given to man in Paradise.’

When we go through this forum, we appreciate this virtue of paradise quite exhaustively.
They have made their own forum as dirtiest a place as it was possible for them.
They are adamant, moreover, to keep it dirtiest.

I don’t think these dirty and obscene persons have emerged in present Islamic society, absolutely out of whole cloth.
No.
They also have their tradition.
They also have their original dirty Arab ancestors who behaved exactly similarly with Huzoor(s) as these morons are behaving here.
Al Qur’an Al Kareem states:
‘There they shall hear no idle talk nor any sinful speech(in Jannat).*13′
-Al Qur’an Al Kareem: 56 Al-Waqi’ah:25
Maulana Saiyad Abul Aala Maududi, rahamatullah alaihi,explains it:

*13 This is one of the major blessings of Paradise, which has been mentioned at several places in the Qur’an, viz. that in Paradise human ears will remain secure against idle and frivolous talk, lying, backbiting slander, invective, boasting and bragging, taunts and mockery, satire and sarcasm. It will not be a society of foul-mouthed, indecent people who will throw mud at each other, but a society of noble and civilized people free of such frivolities. A person who has been blessed with some deceney of manner and sense by Allah can very well feel what an agony it is in worldly life a hope of deliverance from which has been given to man in Paradise.’

When we go through this forum, we appreciate this virtue of paradise quite exhaustively.
They have made their own forum as dirtiest a place as it was possible for them.
They are adamant, moreover, to keep it dirtiest.

The fact is that Al Qur’an Al Karīm itself establishes expressly:

Fala’ uqsimu bimavāqi-innujūmi.’
‘No! I swear by the positions of the stars –’
V’ innahu laqasamul-lau tålmūn azīmun.’
‘and this is indeed a mighty oath, if only you knew –’
Innahu laqur’anun karīmun,
‘That this indeed is a noble Qur’an,
Fe KITĀBIM- MAKNŪNIN.’
‘Inscribed in a well-guarded Book.’
Llā yamassuhu illal-mutahharūn
‘Which none but the pure may touch.’
Tanzīlum minrrabil åālmīn.’
‘A revelation from the Lord of the Universe.’

̶—Al Qur’an Al Kareem: 56 Al Waqi’ah: 75-80

The questions are:

1.       What does ‘Almutahharūn’ ‘the pure ones’ mean here?

2.       What does the ‘yamassuhu’ ‘touch’ mean here?

If we accept the current interpretations of these two

words of Al Qur’an Al Kareem, anyone that touch Al Qur’an Al Kareem is one of the Almutahharūn, ‘the pure ones’.

Is it right?

I don’t think so.

The terrorists do also touch Al Qur’an Al Kareem and they also even read it.

What does it mean?

The terrorists are Almutahharūn? ‘the pure ones’?

Nonsense!

If Al Qur’an Al Kareem is really:

Va mā kān hāzalqur’anu anyuftarā min dūnillāhi va lākin tasdīqallazī bayn yadéhi va tafsīlAlKitābi lā raib fīhi min rabbil åālmīn.’

‘And it was not for this Qur’an to be produced by other than Allah , but a confirmation of what was before it and a detailed explanation of The Scripture, about which there is no doubt, from the Lord of the worlds.’

̶—Al Qur’an Al Kareem: 10 Yunus:37

It can’t even be imagined the terrorists maybe Almutahharūn.

But it can’t be denied that they touch and read Al Qur’an Al Kareem.

Then what is the real meaning of this āyat-e-karīmah?

Certainly, it must have a deep meaning, far more rational, than it is ostensible.

What it can be?

I think the ‘yamassuhu’ ‘touch’ means the real deep meaning of Al Qur’an Al Kareem the ostensible meanings  contain behind them.

Though anyone can touch Al Qur’an Al Kareem physically, only the Almutahharūn, ‘the pure ones’, can touch its real depth that’s the base of all physical and hereafter infinite progress.

The persons who are not Almutahharūn, ‘the pure ones’, can’t even touch this depth.

They can touch Al Qur’an Al Kareem only physically.

To get the true benefits from Al Qur’an Al Kareem, consequently, it is necessary for a person to be one of Almutahharūn, ‘the pure ones’.

The terrorists can’t get them even if they touch and read Al Qur’an Al Kareem physically.

Until and unless they don’t purify their own heart, environment, mind, actions, brain, everything; they can’t get the real benefits Al Qur’an Al Kareem offers to the Almutahharūn, ‘the pure ones’.

The Rabbul åālmīn hasn’t descended His Scripture so that the impure ones can be benefitted and the pure ones may be harmed.

So, the Almighty has put a lock on the real treasure He has bestowed on humankind.

Purify yourself and get everything from Us We have for you.

If you don’t purify yourself, you can touch Al Qur’an Al Kareem physically only.

It has an infinite treasure of our bounties for you if only you purify yourself.

The more you purify yourself, the more you can understand the real meaning of Al Qur’an Al Kareem, and get benefitted both in this physical world and the life hereafter.

Llā yamassuhu illal-mutahharūn
which none but the pure may touch.’

This interpretation of this āyat-e-karīmah stands to

reason and does not conflict with the other āyat-e-karīmāt at all.

It enhances the importance of being Almutahharūn, ‘the pure ones’.

Al Qur’an Al Kareem claims:

Va mā kān hāzalqur’anu anyuftarā min dūnillāhi va lākin tasdīqallazī bayn yadéhi va tafsīlAlKitābi lā raib fīhi min rabbil åālmīn.’

‘And it was not for this Qur’an to be produced by other than Allah , but a confirmation of what was before it and a detailed explanation of The Scripture, about which there is no doubt, from the Lord of the worlds.’

̶Al Qur’an Al Kareem: 10 Yunus:37

Ved, the everfirst Book from the Almighty to the human beings similarly states:

Dadhushŧvā bhr’gavo mānushéshvā rayim n’ chārum Suhavam janébhyah,

hotāramagné atithim varéñyam mitram n’ shévam divyāý janmané.

The pure ones established you, the beautifully called one; for people, properly, in human beings, like beautiful wealth,

Hota, Agni, guest, worthy to be chosen, like affectionate friend, for Divý Janm, Divine Birth.’

̶–Ved: R’gved: 1|58|6

I think Al Qur’an Al Kareem means the same thing here by Almutahharūn, ‘the pure oneswhat the Ved means by ‘Bhr’gavah’, The pure ones’.

Bhr’gu’ does not mean pure one by birth.

Instead, it means a person who has consecrated, purified, his soul and body both practicing stern, faithful, and resolute obedience to Eishān Param Brahm Paramātmā

‘Bhrasj’ pāké Tudādigañasý dhātoh ‘Prathimradibhrasjām samprasārañam s’lopashch’ Uñādi Sūtr 1|28 sūtréñ kah samprasārañam s’lopashch’.

Thus, Al Qur’an Al Kareem is:

tasdīqallazī bayn yadéhi va tafsīlAlKitābi lā raib fīhi min rabbil åālmīn.’

‘A confirmation of what was before it and a detailed explanation of The Scripture, about which there is no doubt, from the Lord of the worlds.’

̶–Al Qur’an Al Kareem: 10 Yunus:37

————————————————————————————–

More on Islam from DSM Sayarthi:

1. Bal huv qur’anum majeedun fe LAUHIM MAHFOOZIN

2. Innahu laquranun kareemun Fee kitabin maknoonin

3. ‘Hudallilmuttaqeen’: ‘Guidance for controllers of organs’: 2 Al Baqarah: 2

4. ‘Alaa qalbik litakoon minal-munzireen’ ‘upon your heart one of who to warn’

5. Muslimahs! Come to India. I recommend Hindu lovers for all the Muslimahs.: Khadeejah Muhammad

6. Islam according to Qur’an and Maulana Maududi rahamatullh alaihi

7. A Moment of grave thinking for the entire sophisticated Muslim Community

Muslimahs! Come to India. I recommend Hindu lovers for all the Muslimahs.: Khadeejah Muhammad

Muslimahs! Come to India. I recommend Hindu lovers for all the Muslimahs.: Khadeejah Muhammad

In Saudi Arabia Forum–
Ash wrote:
Pathetic. If those women just went and drove, the country would have no choice but to give them the right to drive. What are they gonna do? Arrest every woman in the entire country?
But no, instead they choose to submit and whine.
My friend, Khadeejah Muhammad responded to it:

‘You are right. It’s hell. All Islamic countries are real hell. Wafa Sultan is right.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wafa_Sultan
I love you, Durgesh! for everything you are doing for us Muslimahs. you are a darling! I know,Hindus are better not only in bodies, but in minds as well. Muslimahs! Come to India. I invite you. Don’t pay any attention to Saudi/Pakistani bastards.India is heaven as compared to those living hells on earth, called Islamic countries. I don’t hate burqa. In fact, I myself use it. But it should not be forced, as it is in Muslim countries. India is better for us Muslimahs. We are not alone here, as India has a large Muslim population. In addition to that, we Muslimahs can have better lovers here too, Hindus I mean. Hindus treat us Muslimahs equal, not inferior to them as Muslims do. In fact, I recommend Hindu lovers for all the Muslimahs. Just try them and experience the real bliss of life.’

http://www.topix.com/forum/world/saudi-arabia/T0KDOKD59GFDHGMJF/p2#c31

My same friend, KhadeejahMuhammad; elaborates it  somewhere else, when my another friend, Zubeda Sheikh; said:

<quoted text>
Hahaha. Ulloo ka Pattha. Mardua. Jealous of Hindus. We Muslimahs love Hindus very much. We hate you all morons. We are grateful to Hindus that they welcome us in their sex lives. Be jealous and die of shame.

She is right. REAL FULL UNCUT PLEASURE. That’s what we all Muslimahs want, you cut co*ks! Sorry. You lose to Hindus for ever.

http://www.topix.com/forum/world/pakistan/TQM4C59M60MVSPNTR/p6#c149

Everyone can’t get the FULL REAL UNCUT PLEASURE, Zubeda! She is a damnfool and unlucky. Hahaha. Ulloo ki Patthi. Stupid bitch.’

Khadeejah Muhammad, the lioness;  goes on boldly:

Why do Muslim Women Love Hindu Penis into their Crotches Extremely?

Because they are uncut, full, as natural as made by God, extremely sexy, and faithful lifelong. I suggest even Non Muslim Women must try Hindu penis.They would also love them, and will thank me for ever. Best of luck to all womankind. Have a nice Hindu penis, you all, in your crotch. None else, ever.’

http://www.topix.com/forum/world/pakistan/TQM4C59M60MVSPNTR#c1

Zubeda Sheikh welcomed her:

‘Wow! What a girl you are, Khadeejah! You are brave. Bravo!’

http://www.topix.com/forum/world/pakistan/TQM4C59M60MVSPNTR#c5

To abc, my same friend, Khadeejah Muhmmad, said:

‘Lol. You are jealous of Durgesh. You should be. A large number of us Muslimahs love him, and we are even proud of having sexual relations with Durgesh. Don’t worry. You are getting more of it from more different Muslim young women. It’s the hardest slap, we all have decided, to slap you with. Hahaha. Ulloo ka Pattha. Mardua.’

http://www.topix.com/forum/world/pakistan/TQM4C59M60MVSPNTR/p3#c53

She said:

In your dirty fight with Durgesh, WE ARE WITH DURGESH, idiot abc. Now say none have come to his side. He is fighting for our honor, not for him.
You’ve called us DURGESH‘S MOUTHPIECE RANDIS. You have to suffer for it.’

http://www.topix.com/forum/world/pakistan/TQM4C59M60MVSPNTR/p3#c5

http://www.topix.com/forum/world/pakistan/TQM4C59M60MVSPNTR/p3#c56

Another person says:

‘Muslim women are DESPERATE for non muslim dikck. at least this is what one concludes after seeing them behaving here.
mind you, i speak only of what i know, namely muslim women living here in canada.
one should probably expect that, once they come to our free country, and once they see that they actually can go to police and complain if their husband misbehaved toward them.
it is amazing to see the metamorphosis the go thru once they get to know canada or us.
lol, i wouldn’t wanna be a muslim man living here for anything in the world.
i screwed so mani muslim women, many married, i lost count.
in my opinion, this gives them the release valve the so need, since islam is so restrictive on them. when they see they can walk on the street uncovered and nobody gives a shit, of course they gather courage and probe their new life further.
human nature, if you want.
oh, and another thing: it is quite easy to please a muslim woman, just pay attention to her need. i felt complimented when one told me once that her husband never gave her that kind of experience. she said muslim men go in, move their arse a couple of times and that’t it, the little muslim dikck squirts and that’s the end of that.
no wonder frustration and inner fury builds up, after years of such a marriage.
i suggested her she should divorce, she can do that in canada, and guess what, she did so!
now she’s a free woman, free to choose whatever she likes.’

http://www.topix.com/forum/world/pakistan/TQM4C59M60MVSPNTR/p7#c175

Wafa Sultan also says:

“ “I have decided to fight Islam; please pay attention to my statement; to fight Islam, not the political Islam, not the militant Islam, not the radical Islam, not the Wahhabi Islam, but Islam itself…Islam has never been misunderstood, Islam is the problem….(Muslims) have to realize that they have only two choices: to change or to be crushed.”[11]’

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wafa_Sultan#Religious_sentiment

I repeat.

Isn’t it–

‘A moment of grave thinking for the entire sophisticated Muslim community’?

https://dsms.wordpress.com/2009/01/10/a-moment-of-grave-thinking-for-the-entire-sophisticated-muslim-community/

———————————————————————————-

More on Islam from DSM Sayarthi:

1. Bal huv qur’anum majeedun fe LAUHIM MAHFOOZIN

2. Innahu laquranun kareemun Fee kitabin maknoonin

3. ‘Hudallilmuttaqeen’: ‘Guidance for controllers of organs’: 2 Al Baqarah: 2

4. ‘Alaa qalbik litakoon minal-munzireen’ ‘upon your heart one of who to warn’

A moment of grave thinking for the entire sophisticated Muslim community

A moment of grave thinking for the entire sophisticated Muslim community

The everdirty ABC has gone beyond all limits in his unique obsession with obscenity.

He writes:
‘Kanjar Durgesh talking of disgrace to noble Paks with his mouth piece randis talking in his support.’

Great!
Any man who opposes his extreme obscenity is a KANJAR.
Any sane woman who opposes his extreme obscenity is MY MOUTHPIECE RANDI.
And, he is NOBLE.
He calls me KANJAR, because I’m against his insane extreme obscenity.
He calls sophisticated respected MUSLIM LADIES like Khadeejah Muhammad, Saiyada Fatima, Zubeda Sheikh, etc. MY MOUTHPIECE RANDIS, disgracing the entire womankind, thus, actually.
I invite the entire womankind to kick the everdirty beast, hardest.
Let’s deal with the everdirty beast for once and all.

Let’s see the insanes who agree with this idiot.

He, and the persons like him, are a disgrace to their entire society.

The obscenity is ABC to XYZ /Hindukush Raid’s TRUE religion.
he is expert in obscenity only.
He can’t write even a single line without it.
What a moron!
He does not know anything about Islam, Qur’ane Kareem and Ahadeese Muqaddasat.
When he is confronted with them, he runs away; and reappears when the temperature is down.
If you have courage enough to go through all his posts, it’ll be easy to find out that his commitment to obscenity is too much far greater than even his commitment to Islam.

The morons ABC to XYZ, Hindukush Raid, Jack, KBK, Shul, Leo, AAAA, Double AAAA; are unable to answer me, still now.
It should be noted.
Thus, it is proved, extensively; that according to the globally respected scholar of Islam, Maulana Saiyad Abul Aala Maududi, rahamatullah alaihi; even the door to Qur’ane Kareem, is closed to these obscene persons.
They are not Muslims, thus; they are MUNAFIQEEN.

‘Whenever it is said to them, “Spread not disorder on the earth”, their reply is, “We only seek to put things aright”.
– –Al Qur’an Al Kareem: 2 Al Baqarah: 11
‘Beware! They do spread disorder but they realize it not.’
Al Qur’an Al Kareem: 2 Al Baqarah: 12

Andhantamah pravishanti ye’vidyamupasate,
Tato bhooy’iv te tamo y’u viyayagvang rataah.’

‘To blinding darkness go those who make a cult of Nescience.
The devotees of the so called science enter darkness that is darker still.’

-Ved 2Y|40|12.

This beast Double AAAA/ ABC to XYZ/the changing ID moron; is disgrace to Islam, not to me.
The Beast is, as one can see, fully exposed now.
I am not answering these beasts. They do not deserve that much attention from any sane person.

These are the persons who claim, they represent Islam.
This is the vulgar brigade of the fanatics.
As one can see from their entire vulgar and obscene posts, they are not talking of Qur’ano ahadees, even a slightest bit.
They even can’t.
They can’t discuss any issue.
They challenge, and when faced, they run away.
They are bloody black mailers, who black mail sophisticated persons that they don’t oppose them, otherwise they will have to face this entire garbage of vulgarism and obscenity.
They are only abusing their opponents calling them dirty, vulgar and obscene names and titles.
They think this is the holy work they are doing.
I am not asking them, to reconsider what they are doing.
They are beyond sanity.
I am not asking they should stop it.
They can very well continue it.
The key question is: To which extent the real Islamic society can bear these beasts?
If even now, none of the Muslims want to come forward and stop these beasts, the disgrace of Islam is continued.
After 9/11 as Islam is being thought synonymous to terrorism, and Muslims are disrespected everywhere, a new phase will be added more.
The name of Islam will be synonymous to vulgarism more and it will be observed as the most disrespectful ‘religion'(?) to the entire womankind.
A Muslim Woman is already REJECTING these beasts as her life partner, and has already started to marry Hindu males.
Sidrah, and my wife, Saiyada Fatima PhD, are only examples of the same.
They tried their best to make them responsible, but failed miserably.

http://www.topix.com/forum/world/pakistan/T8I…
http://www.topix.com/forum/world/pakistan/TNC…
http://www.topix.com/forum/religion/hindu/T2F…
http://www.topix.com/forum/world/pakistan/TCI…

Read these beasts’ obscene posts and think gravely.
Who sane woman can even agree to marry these beasts?
Let women alone, will any sane Muslim can marry his sister or daughter to these beasts?
The next step is: A woman will be shameful to tell anyone that she is a Muslim even.
And, this all is due to these beasts who claim to represent Islam.

If the entire Muslim society, the Ummate Wist, do not have any objection to this image of Islam, I have nothing to say.

It’s your people.
IT’S YOUR IMAGE.

‘Whenever it is said to them, “Spread not disorder on the earth”, their reply is, “We only seek to put things aright”.
Al Qur’an Al Kareem: 2 Al Baqarah: 11

‘Beware! They do spread disorder but they realize it not.’
Al Qur’an Al Kareem: 2 Al Baqarah: 12

‘Do not revile those whom they invoke rather than Allah, because they will revile Allah in ignorance out of spite.’
Al Qur’an Al Kareem: 6 Al An’am: 108

‘Andhantamah pravishanti ye’vidyamupasate,
Tato bhooy’iv te tamo y’u viyayagvang rataah.’

‘To blinding darkness go those who make a cult of Nescience.
The devotees of the so called science enter darkness that is darker still.’

-Ved 2Y|40|12.

————————————————————————————–

More on Islam from DSM Sayarthi:

1. Bal huv qur’anum majeedun fe LAUHIM MAHFOOZIN

2. Innahu laquranun kareemun Fee kitabin maknoonin

3. ‘Hudallilmuttaqeen’: ‘Guidance for controllers of organs’: 2 Al Baqarah: 2

4. ‘Alaa qalbik litakoon minal-munzireen’ ‘upon your heart one of who to warn’

Yes, I chose to marry a man from the kaafir community .: Sidrah

Yes, I chose to marry a man from the kaafir community .: Sidrah

Sidrah is proud of marrying a Hindu.
Why?
She tells herself:
‘Brother, I understand the need for you to defend Islam, and I won’t argue with you there. I know how much it’s needed in this islamophobic world, so I do appreciate, in a way, what you’re doing.
However, what I couldn’t come to terms with was your calling me a kaafir, or comparing me with the Western woman or, above all, calling me a fornicator and adulterer. Did you ever pause to think how hurtful it is to have that allegation leveled against you? How would you react if I were to level the same charge against a woman from your own family? I’m sure it would hurt you as much as it did hurt me.
My only desire is for Muslim men to change their mentalities and lifestyles; in particular, their perception of women, and to start treating women as equals. It’s not to say that I want women to accept a Western way of living, for I do not, but freedom must be permitted, mainly the right to an education, the right to work, etc.
A few days back I came across news in the media of a woman in the Middle East that had her honor violated by a few men. However, rather than punish those men, the authorities chose to blame the woman instead, asking her why she had to go out with the men in the first place.
Such incidents are not uncommon in the Islamic community and, unfortunately, a majority of the Muslim men do carry similar perceptions and ways of thought.

Everywhere, the woman is always to blame.

Men can do anything and get away with it, but the moment a woman does something wrong, or something similar, or chooses to break out of the shackles and demand her rights, she’s the target of ridicule, scorn, and probably the worst kind of verbal or physical abuse. Just look at how many “honor killings” find prevalence in the Islamic community, that too over trivial matters.

Yes, I chose to marry a man from the kaafir community, and I still stand by my decision.

I wanted someone that could respect me as a woman and give me the freedom I desired and, seeing the state of the Muslim male, I knew I had to look elsewhere.
Whether you like it or not, I do take myself to be a believer and, as much as you’re proud to be Muslim, I’m proud to be Muslim as well. And nothing, by the Grace of Allah, is going to ever make me divert from my faith in Him. You can try to convince me otherwise, you can try to call me a kaafir however much you want, but I know I’m not, and that’s all that matters to me. I believe in the oneness of Allah, and It’s only Him that I worship.’
http://www.topix.com/forum/world/pakistan/TA4…

AAAA Jeddah, Saudi Arabia responded:
‘Sister, i m sorry if i hurt you. But let me tell you one thing if you don’t like the mu slims guys the way they are living in your community you have no rights to say bad about ISLAM, it hurts us, we belive in only two books QURAN & Hadith. about the marriage i will quote you something
“And do not marry Al-Mushrikaat (idolatresses) till they believe (worship Allaah Alone). And indeed a slave woman who believes is better than a (free) Mushrikah (idolatress), even though she pleases you. And give not (your daughters) in marriage to ;Mushrikoon till they believe (in Allaah Alone) and verily, a believing slave is better than a (free) Mushrik (idolater), even though he pleases you. Those (Al-Mushrikoon) invite you to the Fire, but Allaah invites (you) to Paradise and forgiveness by His Leave, and makes His Ayaat (proofs, evidences, verses, lessons, signs, revelations, etc.) clear to mankind that they may remember”
[al-Baqarah 2:221]

No doubt, this is an aayte Kareemh from Al Qur’an Al Kareem.

Even the slavery of the spouse is called here better.

A large number of Muslims believe in this way in this principle and suggest slavery to their spouses instead improving themselves.

I don’t think it the true concept of Islam.

I don’t think Islam came to release only men from slavery.

It came to free the entire womankind as well.

If my concept is true, the interpretation of AAAA of this aayate Kareemah is wrong.

I invite views from intelligent and sophisticated Muslimahs and Muslims.

AAAA said further:
‘—and tell you how media malign ISLAM in the mind of secularist muslims like you.
i will quote the below again for you read it with open mind.
Allah Almighty warns the Muslims:
“O you who believe, if a wicked evildoer comes to you with a news
report, look carefully into it to verify the truth, lest you harm a
people in ignorance and afterwards feel remorseful for what you have
done.”
(Quran, 49:6)
In the time of the Messenger of Allah, the infidels used to spread
lies and slander about the Messenger, and they would propagate false
news reports in order to create dissension and discord amongst the
ranks of the believers. Allah Almighty revealed the above verse so
that the Muslims would be cautious of such reports and so that they
would prevent the seeds of suspicion from entering into their hearts.
Today, the enemies of Islam continue their crusade against Islam,
with the Western media at the forefront of the ideological assault on
Islam. The Western media has consistently proven itself to be
deceitful, biased, and outright wicked; as such, whenever we Muslims
hear anything from them, then we should take it with a grain of salt.
I will continue about the girl who was punished.’
http://www.topix.com/forum/world/pakistan/TA4…

AAAA Jeddah, Saudi Arabia responded further:
‘Western society falsely claims to have uplifted women
Western talk of women’s liberalization is nothing but a disguised form of exploitation of her body, degradation of her soul, and deprivation of her honour.
Western society claims to have ‘uplifted’ women. On the contrary it has actually degraded them to the status of concubines, mistresses and society butterflies who are mere tools in the hands of pleasure seekers and sex marketeers, hidden behind the colourful screen of ‘art’ and ‘culture’.’
http://www.topix.com/forum/world/pakistan/TA4…

I said:
‘The trouble with you over enthusiastic ‘Believers'(?) is you yourself think you are omniscient.
How do you know I’m a disbeliever? How do you know what is there in my heart?
I’m not a disbeliever at all rather than being a true or false one.
Secondly, I have asked so many times what is your question about the Ved Mantr you quoted?
You just quote it and ask me to answer.
What is your question?
What is there you think objectionable?
Put you question and get the answer.

‘The Jews say that the Christians have nothing and the Christians say that the Jews have nothing of it, though both read the Scripture. And those who have no knowledge of the Scripture also make similar claims. Allah will surely give His judgment on the Day of Resurrection in all the matters in which they differ.’
Al Qur’an Al Kareem 2 Al Baqarah 113
‘The fact is that no one has any special claim to Paradise; whoever surrenders himself to Allah in obedience and follows the Right Way, shall get his reward from his Lord: there shall be neither fear nor grief for such people.’
Al Qur’an Al Kareem 2 Al Baqarah 112
‘wa la taAAsaw fil-arzi mufsideen’
Do not spread disorder on earth.
Al Qur’an Al Majeed 2 Al Baqarah 60.

‘Whenever it is said to them, “Spread not disorder on the earth”, their reply is, “We only seek to put things aright”.
Al Qur’an Al Kareem 2 Al Baqarah 11
‘Beware! They do spread disorder but they realize it not.’
Al Qur’an Al Kareem 2 Al Baqarah: 12
http://www.topix.com/forum/world/pakistan/TA4…

————————————————————————————–

More on Islam from DSM Sayarthi:

1. Bal huv qur’anum majeedun fe LAUHIM MAHFOOZIN

Most Present day Muslims don’t do what Huzoor(SAW) did: DSM Satyarthi

Most Present day Muslims don’t do

what Ħuzūrsaw did

DSM Satyarthi

Most Present day Muslims believe that they do what Huzoor(SAW) did.
I don’t think it true.
If it had been, the most of the humankind would have been Muslim.
They were not hating Islam, as they are hating it today.
I’ve already discussed the subject matter somewhere else:

http://www.topix.com/forum/world/pakistan/T8IF30JQNC11F5L81

/p19#c448

Salman wrote:
<quoted text>
‘Islam does not believe in rebirth, but only resurrection and the Last Judgment Day. In contrast to Islam, Hinduism considers life in heaven and hell as temporary. A soul regains freedom forever only through self-realization.
In Islam there is no concept of Trinity. God is one and indivisible. Hinduism recognizes three highest functional aspects of God in the form of Brahma, Vishnu and Siva, who are called the Three Deities (Trimurthis),depicted either as one or separate deities, who carry out the three primary functions of God’s manifestation, namely creation, preservation and destruction.
Hazrat Muhammad (SAW) set an example to crush the idols. So being a Hindu, can u do this?’

http://www.topix.com/forum/world/pakistan/T8IF30JQNC11F5L81/p19#c444

I replied:
‘You have enlisted here three major differences:
1. Rebirth.
2.Trinity.
3. Crushing of idols.
I will reverse them in order as I have already answered the last one but you have repeated the same nevertheless.
I am unable to understand why did you do it.
When I have already answered a question either you should show your disagreement with my answer in detail that why do you disagree with me in the matter, or accept that my answer has answered you completely.
You haven’t adopted either attitude.
Instead, you just go on and repeat your question almost word to word.
I had answered:
‘Hindu tradition differs here profoundly.
We respect what Huzoor(S) did.
He was the apostle of the God.
He did know better what he(S) was doing.
We, the normal persons; do not have any right to criticize the great revolutionist(S) of his time.
We should only try to understand what he did and why he would have done it.
Then we should follow him(S) according to Al Qur’an Al Majeed.
We do not have any right to contradict or criticize him(S).
He(S) was bestowed with Meraj. We are not.
He(S) knew more than us.
He(S)sacrificed his life fighting against evil.
Nevertheless, Hindu tradition differs here.
Mind you! I’m telling Hindu tradition! not Hinduism!
There are many persons who are adamant that every Hindu tradition is Hinduism.
I don’t.
Hindu tradition is to explain the person what the real truth is. Explain him/her everything in quite detail.

But never compel him to do anything against her/his wishes.
We convince one that idol worship is not preached in Ved.
Ved preaches Meditation.
We explain what is wrong in idol worship and what is better in meditation.
Yet, the ultimate decision rests with her/him.
We do not compel anyone to change one’s faith.
We never insist.
He/she has her/his own reasoning.
We will discuss with one for years, but will never compel.
The decision must be hers/his.
It does not mean that we criticize Huzoor(s) for His(S) crushing of idols.
No! We don’t think we have any right to.
He(S) understood more what he(S) did.

http://www.topix.com/forum/world/pakistan/T8IF30JQNC11F5L81/p19#c448

Salman, Karachi, Pakistan wrote:
‘Hazrat Muhammad (SAW) didn’t have any version of Islam. He had the true Islam and he didn’t compromise on truth and kept on following Allah’s commands even though he was brutally beaten by Mushrikins but he kept on preaching Islam.’

http://www.topix.com/forum/world/pakistan/T8IF30JQNC11F5L81/p19#c461

Salman, Karachi, Pakistan wrote further:
‘You don’t have to say sorry. Actually I like this conversation, any ways you said
“Similarly, I believe Islam is what Qur’ano ahadeese muqaddasat tell us, not what Muslims believe, do and practice”.

What Muslims do is according to Islam. There are things which they don’t practice (which is wrong) but Islam is not just a religion it is a complete code of life and as a Muslim you have to implement Islam in your life for example if you don’t offer prayers means that you are saying. that “ok I believe on Islam but I don’t want to offer prayers and I believe that offering prayers means that I m showing that I m a Muslim where as it is better to be a Muslim from Inside”.

Similarly if you don’t practice Hinduism that is also wrong if you are a Hindu.
About Namaz Hazrat Muhammad (SAW) said that “the only difference between a believer and a non-believer is Namaz”.’

http://www.topix.com/forum/world/pakistan/T8IF30JQNC11F5L81/p18#c424

I replied AAAA:
‘You have written:
then you are a communist or you are living in a confused state, Make up your mind?’
I am unable to follow your reasoning!
Do you know what a communist is?
I am confident you don’t.
I am giving you a web address. Click it to know what a communist is first, then we will discuss on this point:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Communist
‘or you are living in a confused state.’
No! I am not! I am quite clear! There is no confusion at all.
My mind is already made up.
‘And whoever contradicts and opposes the Messenger (Muhammad, Peace Be
Upon Him) after the right path has been shown clearly to him.’
I am neither contradicting nor opposing Huzoor(S).
‘The Jews say that the Christians have nothing and the Christians say that the Jews have nothing of it, though both read the Scripture. And those who have no knowledge of the Scripture also make similar claims. Allah will surely give His judgment on the Day of Resurrection in all the matters in which they differ.’
–Al Qur’an Al Kareem: 2 Al Baqarah: 113
The fact is that no one has any special claim to Paradise; whoever surrenders himself to Allah in obedience and follows the Right Way, shall get his reward from his Lord: there shall be neither fear nor grief for such people.’
Al Qur’an Al Kareem: 2 Al Baqarah: 112
wala taa’saw fil-arzi mufsideen.’
Do not spread disorder on earth.’
Al Qur’an Al Majeed 2 Al Baqarah: 60.

Whenever it is said to them, “Spread not disorder on the earth”, their reply is, “We only seek to put things aright”.
–Al Qur’an Al Kareem: 2 Al Baqarah: 11
Beware! They do spread disorder but they realize it not.’
Al Qur’an Al Kareem: 2 Al Baqarah: 12

I believe Allah knows better what is Islam than you.
Sorry to differ with you altogether in the matter.’

http://www.topix.com/forum/world/pakistan/T8IF30JQNC11F5L81/p18#c425

Salman wrote:
‘Durgesh!
You always talk about your PhD wife but tell me does she possess more knowledge than the Ulamas who have given all of their lives in Islamic studies?’

http://www.topix.com/forum/world/pakistan/T8IF30JQNC11F5L81/p19#c445

He argued further:
‘You have quoted this aayat:

‘The fact is that no one has any special claim to Paradise; whoever surrenders himself to Allah in obedience and follows the Right Way, shall get his reward from his Lord: there shall be neither fear nor grief for such people.’
Al Qur’an Al Kareem: 2 Al Baqarah: 112

Surrendering in front of Allah means to obey him in the similar way which Allah had told you. And not by picking different things from different religions. Reading between the lines is always dangerous.

‘Beware! They do spread disorder but they realize it not.’
Al Qur’an Al Kareem: 2 Al Baqarah: 12

Personal interpretation of a religion just to satisfy my wants is that disorder which is being prohibited by Allah.’
http://www.topix.com/forum/world/pakistan/T8I…

He argued to Sidrah:
‘Sidra!

You didn’t condemn the title of this thread, never showed any concerns over it and never gave your justifications which surely disgrace you as well.

It’s shocking, hurting and surprising!’

http://www.topix.com/forum/world/pakistan/T8IF30JQNC11F5L81/p19#c447

AAAA wrote:
‘Durgesh jabalpur wrote:

Great! Akbar was stupid for this proudy stupid Arab.’
!

‘you are calling me a stupied Arab, it. this is the job of clever people?
Anti-Christian Hate Campaigns Fuel Persecution in India
(September 25, 2007) The Washington, DC based human rights group, International Christian Concern (ICC) www.persecution.org has learned that Hindu extremist groups have actively been campaigning against Christians for close to a decade, yet there is little the government has done to check what continues to fuel India’s worst incidents of religious persecution.
Often, reporting on Christian persecution in India tends to focus on the incidents, and not the causes, of persecution. Rarely do we see the big picture – that Hindu ultra-nationalists who believe that to be Indian means to be Hindu are taking advantage of the uneducated and waging a hate-filled propaganda campaign against Christians.
Most recently, Hindu extremist groups Bajrang Dal and Hindu Jagruti Samiti distributed thousands of anti-Christian leaflets in Chitradurga district in the southern state of Karnataka last month. This campaign resulted in an incident on August 5, when at least 50 extremists attacked more than 10 workers of the Seventh Day Adventist church during the dedication of a new church in Sira area between Tumkur and Chitradurga districts. On August 16, the victimized Christian workers were arrested on charges of “forcible conversion.”
The trend of launching venomous propaganda campaigns that incite physical attacks against the Christian minority came to fore in 1998 when the Hindu-nationalist Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), the political arm of the chief Hindu extremist organization, Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS), graduated from a party on the margins to a mainstream and ruling party in India.
Soon after the BJP’s accession to power, there was a spate of violence against Christians from December 25, 1998, through January 3, 1999, in the Dangs district of Gujarat state. These attacks included the killing of priests and the raping of nuns to the physical destruction of Christian schools, churches, colleges, and cemeteries. Hundreds of Christians were also forced to “reconvert” to Hinduism. The outbreak of violence in Dangs is typical of how anti-Christian violence is organized in various parts of the country.
According to a report by the Human Rights Watch,“Politics by Other Means: Attacks against Christians in India,” the extremist group Hindu Jagran Manch (HJM) obtained permission to hold a rally on December 25, 1998 in Ahwa town in the Dangs district. Over 4,000 people participated in the rally, shouting anti-Christian slogans while the police stood by and watched. After the rally, the attacks began on Christian places of worship, schools run by missionaries, and shops owned by Christians.
In another incident, Hindu villagers, with the encouragement of a village chief, gang-raped two Christian women after their families refused to denounce Christianity on May 28, 2006 in Nadia village in Bhagwanpura block in Madhya Pradesh state’s Khargone district. A fact-finding report noted,“There have been several attacks against the Christian community since 2003, but the intensity of persecutions increased since May 21, 2006, followed by a rally organized by the Vanvasi Kalyan Ashram (organization for welfare of tribal people).”
Given that hate campaigns and consequent attacks polarize people along religious lines, the BJP, which portrays itself as the “protector” of Hindus, benefits politically.
ICC research noted that hate campaigns attract several local laws, and yet the media – both local and international, the state and federal governments in India as well as international organizations have a tendency to take note only of “violent incidents” while failing to address the backdrop against which such incidents takes place.’

http://www.topix.com/forum/world/pakistan/T8IF30JQNC11F5L81/p19#c452

I said:
‘What did you expect from me when you called all my country people Stupid people?
‘you country people now akber, badshah and all that stupied people .’
Did you expect I will be glad that you have called all my country people Stupid and will announce that ‘I love you for your great love for me and my country people?
You used first this word ‘Stupid’ and now you yourself are complaining for it?
What an attitude!
Great manners!
My country people were not talking to you.
What was the context to call all my country people Stupid?
If one abuses someone, that  one should be prepared to be abused.
Instead, the entire Internet Community can appreciate my civilized reaction that I have called Stupid only you, not all your country people.
They can’t be held responsible for your attitude.
Nevertheless, I did not mean it.
It was only to show you and make you realize that you should not have done it.
I’m sorry! I don’t think you are really stupid. It were bad manners in response to your bad manners!
I am profoundly sorry that I had to resort to that attitude.
You did not leave another option for me.
Sorry again nevertheless!
Now, why have you written  that long passage?
You have not clarified it.
If you think I advocate all those inhuman activities of the so called Hindus, you are quite wrong.

I don’t.
However, I don’t know the full details.
As such, I am not a suitable person to comment on it.

If the incidences happened as you described, it is inhumane and barbaric, but my experience is that the media is generally anti Hindu in the matters.
I’m giving two links here.
If you like to go on the matter, you may click the links and can understand what I mean by it.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-Hinduism

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-Brahminism

‘or you are living in a confused state.’
No! I am not! I am quite clear! There is no confusion at all.
My mind is already made up.
‘And whoever contradicts and opposes the Messenger (Muhammad, Peace Be
Upon Him) after the right path has been shown clearly to him.’
I am neither contradicting nor opposing Huzoor(S).
‘The Jews say that the Christians have nothing and the Christians say that the Jews have nothing of it, though both read the Scripture. And those who have no knowledge of the Scripture also make similar claims. Allah will surely give His judgment on the Day of Resurrection in all the matters in which they differ.’
Al Qur’an Al Kareem: 2 Al Baqarah: 113
‘The fact is that no one has any special claim to Paradise; whoever surrenders himself to Allah in obedience and follows the Right Way, shall get his reward from his Lord: there shall be neither fear nor grief for such people.’
Al Qur’an Al Kareem: 2 Al Baqarah: 112
‘wala taa’saw fil-arzi mufsideen.’
‘Do not spread disorder on earth.’
Al Qur’an Al Majeed 2 Al Baqarah: 60.

‘Whenever it is said to them, “Spread not disorder on the earth”, their reply is, “We only seek to put things aright”.
Al Qur’an Al Kareem: 2 Al Baqarah: 11
‘Beware! They do spread disorder but they realize it not.’
Al Qur’an Al Kareem: 2 Al Baqarah: 12

I believe Allah knows better what is Islam than you.
Sorry to differ with you altogether in the matter.’

http://www.topix.com/forum/world/pakistan/T8IF30JQNC11F5L81/p18#c425

I replied to Salman Karachi:
‘You have written:
‘What Muslims do is according to Islam.’
Here again we go around in circles.
The key question is who is Muslim?
Whether you will define a Muslim, or Allah?
Whether you will reward Jannat in Aakhirat, or Allah?
Allah says:
‘The fact is that no one has any special claim to Paradise; whoever surrenders himself to Allah in obedience and follows the Right Way, shall get his reward from his Lord: there shall be neither fear nor grief for such people.’
Al Qur’an Al Kareem: 2Al Baqarah:112

His certificate is more than enough for me and is above all the rest of the certificates.
I do not have  to obey Muslims or the persons who are too  proud of being so called Muslims, whether they are actually Muslims or not.
You have written:
‘as a Muslim you have to implement Islam in your life.’
How do you know I don’t?’

http://www.topix.com/forum/world/pakistan/T8IF30JQNC11F5L81/p18#c425

Sidrah Bombay, India said:
‘Salman wrote:
‘About Namaz Hazrat Muhammad (SAW) said that “the only difference between a believer and a non-believer is Namaz”.’

‘So in that case, you do agree that a person who observes salat is not a kaafir, right?’

http://www.topix.com/forum/world/pakistan/T8IF30JQNC11F5L81/p18#c427

AAAA wrote:
<quoted text>
‘The name hindu is given by a muslim you can read you counrty history if you want.in the book “discovery of india”. and one of indian writer viveknanda has also mention that name ‘hindu plays a misnoma. the actual name should be “Vedantist”. the people who lived on the other side of the river Indus are called HINDUS. that is what is your country history, so make up your mind. don’t be hypocrites and think with a open Mind.’
I replied:
Shabd Kalpdrum/Raamkosh is more ancient than the Muslims.
How a name given by a Muslim, could be included in Shabd Kalpdrum/Raamkosh?
Your claim is, therefore,  wrong.
Mr. Jawaharlal Nehru was mistaken if he

wrote that in ‘Discovery of India’.
The book is already outdated and needs updation very badly.
Anyway Shabd Kalpdrum/Raamkosh are more ancient than Muslims . AND Muslims are more ancient than Jawaharlal Nehru.’
http://www.topix.com/forum/world/pakistan/T8I…
Moreover, I congratulated Sidrah:
‘Bravo Sidrah! Congratulations for asking the key question.’
http://www.topix.com/forum/world/pakistan/T8I…
Salman said:
‘Neither I am criticizing you nor am I saying that I will decide that who should be awarded the ‘Jannat’. What I want to say is that for a Muslim it is necessary to leave other religion he should be only a Muslim other wise he is a communist or what ever. That’s the reason why I gave the example of Namaz.’

http://www.topix.com/forum/world/pakistan/T8IF30JQNC11F5L81/p18#c430

Sidrah Bombay, India asked:
‘Tell me, is there any PM feature supported on this board?’

http://www.topix.com/forum/world/pakistan/T8IF30JQNC11F5L81/p18#c433

I replied:
‘I don’t know.However get my email address:
satyaryhi.dsm@gmail.com
You are most welcome.’

http://www.topix.com/forum/world/pakistan/T8IF30JQNC11F5L81/p18#c436

To Salman, I replied:
‘I can’t understand whether you belong to Islam or communism.
You are telling me either tell to you what you want me to tell you or I’m a communist.
why are you trying your best to throw away a person to communism who claims to be a Muslim?
You persons do not understand what communism is even.
Please click to the link below and study carefully what communism is first. Then we can discuss properly on my being a communist or not:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Communist

You have written:
‘it is necessary to leave other religion he should be only a Muslim other wise he is a communist or what ever.’
Which other religion, Salman Sahab?

I have already written:

‘As per Ved and Qur’an Hinduism and Islam are not two religions.
Ved is everfirst book of Islam and Qur’an is according to its claim the last book of Hinduism.

‘innallazeen aamanoo vallazeen haadoo vannasaaraa vassaabieen man aaman billaahi val yaumil aakhiri wa amil saalihan f’ lahum ajruhum ind rabbihim wa laa khaufun alaihim wa laa hum yahzanoon.’

Whether they are the ones who believe, or whether they are Jews, Christians or Saabieen, all who believe in Allah and the last day, and do righteous deeds, their reward is surely secure with their Lord; they need have no fear, nor shall they grieve.’
Al Qur’an Al Kareem: 2 Al Baqarah: 62

http://www.topix.com/forum/world/pakistan/T8IF30JQNC11F5L81/p18#c438

AAAA wrote ridiculously copying me from somewhere else:
‘BTW we don’t need you certification, first you ask yourself what you are doing, you are living you life in confused state, one end you are saying you don’t believe in idol worshim at one end you are saying you believe in one god and messenger, don’t be hypocrites or else you are trying to please any muslims in this forum.
first decide yourself, islam & muslim don’t need your or anybody certificate. their is no contradiction in quran and hadith and the one who follows it strictly with stong believe are muslims. to please somebody if you are doing that and living in a confused state means thats is your problem or you are doing in wantedly, i judge a person in the light of quran and hadith & in that their is a explanation of all kind people.

Masaalama Yakhi’

http://www.topix.com/forum/world/pakistan/T8IF30JQNC11F5L81/p18#c434

I replied:
‘You have ridiculously written, imitating me, absolutely out of context:
‘BTW we don’t need you certification.’
I am not issuing any certificate.
You are issuing it for Sidrah, me and my wife, Saiyada Fatima PhD, in Arabic Islamic literature.
The more we are trying to avoid the unpleasant discussion, the more you are insisting to issue the certificate.
We don’t need it.
We know your type of people very well.
You created Sunni, Shia, Ahmadi, Wahabi and so on firqas expelling them out of Islam, as if Islam is your father’s property.
The people, like you, forced Akbar to abandon Islam at last and devise an altogether new religion Dine Ilahi that was the religion of state from thereon.
I don’t expect you to realize your fatal mistakes even now.
You are so convinced that the interpretations of Muslim Badshahs are only the real Islam that you are not paying any attention to the Qur’anic verses I am quoting again and again.
You are not telling, in the presence of these Aayate Kareemat, why you are right and why I am wrong.
You just avoid them and go on repeating your baseless silly accusations repetitively:
And when they are told:’Follow what Allah has revealed’, they say:’No, we shall follow what we found our forefathers practicing.’
What! Even if their forefathers lacked understanding, and right guidance?
Those who have refused to follow the way of Allah resemble cattle; when the shepherd calls them they hear nothing except shouting and crying.
They are deaf, dumb, and blind, and so they understand nothing.’
Al Qur’an Al Kareem: 2 Al Baqarah: 170 171

http://www.topix.com/forum/world/pakistan/T8IF30JQNC11F5L81/p18#c439

AAAA told:
‘who is akber what is dine illahi, it is people like you and theis is one writer from india Arun shourie who always quote the things out of the context and malign islam. you can check all my post, we are arabs and we believe in only Allah and the messanger thats it. don’t try to spread fake things , you are hypocrites at one end you are hindu and the other end you are saying you believe in Allah, that’s what is said in Sahih Bukhari about the Hypocrites.”they say they are one of you when they are with you, when they are behind they will refuse it”.
i have quote everything with Ref, ok.
can you or your PHD wife Read what surah baqrah says in Versus 221. and explain it if you are not hypocrites.
And whoever contradicts and opposes the Messenger (Muhammad, Peace Be
Upon Him) after the right path has been shown clearly to him, and
follows other than the believers'(Ummah/Sahaba) ways. We shall keep
him in the path he has chosen, and burn him in Hell – what an evil
destination.(Surah An-Nisaa 4:115)
who is badshah and akbar may be they are your ideal.
our muslims Role model is Only Muhammed SAW got it.
you country people now akber, badshah and all that stupied people .
we now Khaled bin waleed, have you ever heard of him or you PHD wife? all the companians?
i now your country specially of politics .
anyways MAKE UP YOUR MIND , don’t live in confused state.’

http://www.topix.com/forum/world/pakistan/T8IF30JQNC11F5L81/p18#c440

I replied:
‘Sorry! So, I have touched your paining nerve?
I expected so.
I wanted to bring your real identity on Internet.
I am glad I’ve succeeded.
Returning to your old ethnic pride?

That’s what you Arab people did, after martyrdom of Hazrat Ali(A).
All your old Arab ethnicity awakened and in the new disguise of Islam, you started to quarrel with each other resuming your own old dirty ethnic qabaili quarrels Islam had succeeded in postponing at last.

Under the great Khilafat of Hazrat Abu Bakr Siddiq(R), Hazrat Umar(R), Hazrat Usman Ghani(R) and Hazrat Ali(A), you people had learned profoundly that your old dirty Arab ethnicity which was termed Jahiliyat, Ignorance, can never flourish up if the real Islam will remain in power. So you people, I mean people like you in then Arab, conspired and started to quarrel with each other, keeping aside the great Islamic brotherhood, as you are ignoring all the Aayaate Kareemat I am quoting.
The conspiracy brought, ultimately, Hazrat Myavia(A) into power ostensibly and Mal’oon Yazeed actually.
It resulted into Karbala.
Don’t throw stones on our Indian history.
Your Arabian history is also not very good.
You are priding on Huzoor(S) today while the separatists Arabs like you caused Karbala, knowingly or unknowingly it does not make any difference.
You have with all your non Islamic dirty ethnic pride have written:
‘who is akber what is dine illahi, it is people like you.’

Yes! Akbar was a people like us.
It is a great pride for me and my wife, Saiyada Fatima PhD in Arabic Islamic literature; that the people like you are comparing us with the great personality of Akbar the great.
As for Sidrah, she can speak for herself.
I have no right to speak for her.
She can respond on it herself.
But as for my wife and me are concerned, it is a great honor for us, that we are being compared with the great Mughal, Mughale Aazm Shahanshah Jalaluddin Muhammad Akbar.
Thank you very much.
We are grateful to you.

http://www.topix.com/forum/world/pakistan/T8IF30JQNC11F5L81/p18#c441

You have continued to write:
‘theis is one writer from india Arun shourie who always quote the things out of the context and malign islam.
It is now you who is bringing the matter out of context in discussion.
I am not going to respond it positively or otherwise.
I’m not responsible for what others of my countrypeople do.
Arun Shourie is a great writer and is fully competent to defend himself.

He does not need me to advocate him.
You have written:
‘you can check all my post, we are arabs and we believe in only Allah and the messanger thats it.’
I don’t need to.

I believe you if you say so, because it is sufficient for me to accept a person’s validity of Eiman, if one declares so.
I never go to the extent to call him hypocrite.
I, and my wife joins me in this attitude; leave these great services of Islam to the people like you.
We don’t qualify such great services.
It suits to you high ethnic Arab people.
Keep it on and separate all the persons from each other who claim to be Muslims on this pretext or another.
You are doing a great service.
Even Huzoor(S) could not do it.
There were no Shia or Sunni as long as he(S) was present on the Earth.
You have written further:
don’t try to spread fake things , you are hypocrites at one end you are hindu and the other end you are saying you believe in Allah, that’s what is said in Sahih Bukhari about the Hypocrites.”they say they are one of you when they are with you, when they are behind they will refuse it”.

How do you know what we do behind?
Are you omniscient?
We have read in Qur’ane Azeem that only Allah is omniscient.

I did not know you Arabs also share Him in this privilege!
Great!
What an Eiman!
You further write:
‘i have quote everything with Ref, ok.
can you or your PHD wife Read what surah baqrah says in Versus 221. and explain it if you are not hypocrites.’
As if you care what we explain.
Everyone can see who is hypocrite!
You have quoted:
And whoever contradicts and opposes the Messenger (Muhammad, Peace Be
Upon Him) after the right path has been shown clearly to him, and
follows other than the believers'(Ummah/Sahaba) ways. We shall keep
him in the path he has chosen, and burn him in Hell – what an evil
destination.(Surah An-Nisaa 4:115)

I have already replied it.
Let me copy paste what I had written:

”I am neither contradicting nor opposing Huzoor(S).
‘The Jews say that the Christians have nothing and the Christians say that the Jews have nothing of it, though both read the Scripture. And those who have no knowledge of the Scripture also make similar claims. Allah will surely give His judgment on the Day of Resurrection in all the matters in which they differ.’
Al Qur’an Al Kareem: 2 Al Baqarah: 113
‘The fact is that no one has any special claim to Paradise; whoever surrenders himself to Allah in obedience and follows the Right Way, shall get his reward from his Lord: there shall be neither fear nor grief for such people.’
Al Qur’an Al Kareem: 2 Al Baqarah: 112
‘wala taAAthaw fee al-ardi mufsideena’
Do not spread disorder on earth.
Al Qur’an Al Majeed 2 Al Baqarah: 60.
‘Whenever it is said to them, “Spread not disorder on the earth”, their reply is, “We only seek to put things aright”.
Al Qur’an Al Kareem: 2 Al Baqarah: 11
‘Beware! They do spread disorder but they realize it not.’
Al Qur’an Al Kareem: 2 Al Baqarah: 12
I believe Allah knows better what is Islam than you.
Sorry to differ with you altogether in the matter.’

http://www.topix.com/forum/world/pakistan/T8IF30JQNC11F5L81/p19#c442

‘The last part of what you have written is:
‘who is badshah and akbar may be they are your ideal.
our muslims Role model is Only Muhammed SAW got it.
you country people now akber, badshah and all that stupied people .’
‘Great! Akbar was stupid for this proudy stupid Arab.
Is he really Muslim?
Vallah aalam Vissawab!
His manners indicate otherwise!

You continued to write:
we now Khaled bin waleed, have you ever heard of him or you PHD wife? all the companians?’

See this foolish person!
He is asking whether a PhD in Arabic Islamic literature and her husband, even Hindu, have heard about Hazrat Khalid bin Valeed(R).

What an understanding!

‘i now your country specially of politics .’
How specialized knowledge you have!
Nobody, except you great Arab people, has succeeded to know this greatest secret!
‘anyways MAKE UP YOUR MIND , don’t live in confused state.’
The foolish person is himself/herself, I don’t know which, he/she is afraid of using his/her real name, confused and imposing his/her confusion on us.
Huzoor! Sarkar! Arab the great! My mind is already made up!My mind is already made up!My mind is already made up!
You have finished with:

‘don’t live in confused state.’
I am absolutely clear in my mind!I am absolutely clear in my mind!I am absolutely clear in my mind!
Thanks for the concern shown!
Hamare bhi hain meharban kaise kaise!’

http://www.topix.com/forum/world/pakistan/T8IF30JQNC11F5L81/p19#c443

I said:
‘What did you expect from me when you called all my country people Stupid people?
‘you country people now akber, badshah and all that stupied people .’
Did you expect I will be glad that you have called all my country people Stupid and will announce that ‘I love you for your great love for me and my country people?
You used first this word ‘Stupid’ and now you yourself are complaining for it?
What an attitude!
Great manners!
My country people were not talking to you.
What was the context to call all my country people Stupid?
If one abuses one one should be prepared to be abused.
Instead, the entire Internet Community can appreciate my civilized reaction that I have called Stupid only you, not all your country people.
They can’t be held responsible for your attitude.
Nevertheless, I did not mean it.
It was only to show you and make you realize that you should not have done it.
I’m sorry! I don’t think you are really stupid. It were bad manners in response to your bad manners!
I am profoundly sorry that I have to resort to that attitude.
You did not leave another option for me.
Sorry again nevertheless!
Now, why have you written that long passage?
You have not clarified it.
If you think I advocate all those inhuman activities of the so called Hindus, you are quite wrong. I don’t.
However, I don’t know the full details.
As such, I am not a suitable person to comment on it.
If the incidences happened as you described it is inhumane and barbaric, but my experience is that the media is generally anti Hindu in the matters.
I’m giving two links here.
If you like to go on the matter, you may click the links and can understand what I mean by it.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-Hinduism

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-Brahminism

http://www.topix.com/forum/world/pakistan/T8IF30JQNC11F5L81/p19#c455

Salman wrote:
<quoted text>
We should not adopt hypocrisy and should give simple answers.
We Muslims believe what Hazrat Muhammad (SAW) did was right hence I as a Muslim will act like our Prophet (SAW) did. My question was not that how you differ with Hazrat Muhammad (SAW) instead it was can u do the same what Prophet (SAW) did?
It’s a simple Yes or No my friend!’

I said:

‘No! It is not a simple case of yes and no!
And if you still think it a simple case of yes and no, you have not understood what why and when Huzoor(S) did what he(S) did.
He(S) did not do it until he had won Mecca and thereby physically had changed the law of the land.
He respected the law of the land more than you so called Muslims do.
He never imposed his version of Islam on others.
He was a great personality and you are not following even his(S) shadow.
You think you follow him(S).
‘think’, not ‘follow’ really.
Until and unless he(S) did not succeed in changing the law of the land, what did he do?
He(S) followed the law of the land.
He(S) did not only differ with the law of the land, he(S) hated it immensely.

Yet, he(S) respected it to the extent that when a Muslim was captured by the then Mushrikeene Arab, and succeeded in running away from them, in spite of the fact that none of the Muslims agreed with him(S), he(S) returned the Muslim to the Mushrikeene Arab.

It was the respect of the law of the land, till it was the law of the land.
And, as soon as he(S) was capable to change it, he(S) changed it with a blow and then, THEN, he(S) crushed the idols.
So, Janab Salman Sahab! it was the seerat Sarvare Aalam(S)which won the then rotten globe.

What do you think, India was not benefited by him(S) then?
You are quite mistaken again.
According to Bhavishy’Puran, the Great Poet of Sanskr’t Mahakavi Kalidas went to Huzoor(S) and according to the same Puran, he embraced Islam.
Huzoor(S) wanted Hazrat Zainab bint Jahash(R) should not divorce his(S) slave Hazrat Zaid bin Haris, she(R) refused to agree with him(S).
What did he(S) do?
Declared her(R) out of Islam?
Said she(R) were not a Muslimah anymore,  as she refused to obey him(S)?

No! He(S) allowed her(S) what she wanted to do and married her(R) himself, even against all the criticism till now!
He did not impose his(S) version of Islam on anyone.
He preached Islam, not his(S) version of Islam.

You people claim to follow that great personalty(S).
Understand him(S) before you claim.
No! I also respect the law of the land as Huzoor(S) did.

Therefore I will never crush idols till it is prohibited in the law of the land.

Thanks for bearing with me so far!’

http://www.topix.com/forum/world/pakistan/T8IF30JQNC11F5L81/p19#c456

I said further:
‘No! I am not confused at all.
The difference of opinion arises because we don’t mean the same thing when we use the words already very much in use.
I believe the religion is what our divine books preach, not that we believe and practice.
When I use the word Hinduism I always mean what the Ved preaches, irrespective of what the so called Hindus believe, practice, or preach.
Their wishes are not Hinduism.
It is not my self devised definition of Hinduism.
Ved claims:
svayambhooryathatathyatoartha nvyadadhachchhashvateebhyah samabhyah

The Self Existent has constituted the values for eternal subjects forever according to facts.’

Ved:2Y: 40/8.

Manusmr’ti supports it:
‘Vedo’khilo dharmmoolam’
‘The entire Ved is the root of Dharm.’

–Manusmr’ti 2|6

‘Dharmjigyasmananam pramanam paramam Shrutih’.
‘For the persons who want to know what the Dharm is, Ved is the absolute criteria.’

–Manusmr’ti 2|13

You don’t believe it.
You believe Hinduism is what you find in the practices of the so called Hindus.
It is the fundamental difference of opinion we two have between us.

Till we have this fundamental difference, there will always be this or that differences between our discussions.
We will never agree with each other.

Similarly, I believe Islam is what Qur’ano ahadeese muqaddasat tell us, not what Muslims believe, do and practice.
You differ with me here also.
You believe Islam is what interpreted by the Muslim Badshahs or for them also.
I differ with you strongly and fundamentally.
It brings all the other differences between us about Islam and Muslims.
The difference of opinion will always be there as we differ in our fundamental definitions.

Sorry! but it is the actual truth.
Sorry to differ with you so profoundly.’

http://www.topix.com/forum/world/pakistan/T8IF30JQNC11F5L81/p17#c418@@@

Salman said:
‘Durgesh!
My friend I just want to say that I m no one to judge any one’s Iman it is a matter which must be decided by Allah. But what I have under stood after talking to you that you believe on one God but you said that you are a Hindu at the same time; but there are some other believes in Islam which differs from Hinduism so how can you say that both the religions are same?
For example Hazrat Muhammad (SAW) crushed the idols after the conquest of Macca so being a Hindu can you do this?(Again I would say don’t get me wrong and I m not giving any Muslim king example I m giving the example of Prophet Muhammad (SAW)).’

http://www.topix.com/forum/world/pakistan/T8IF30JQNC11F5L81/p17#c416

I said:
‘Again the same objection that I have already answered.
When I say I am a Hindu, I do not mean that I am an Idol worshiper.
I hate idol worship.
According to Ved Eishan Param Brahm Paramatma, i.e. the God, has no idol at all.
You find an image of idol worshiper as soon as you hear the word Hindu.
That is the trouble between us.
We don’t mean same thing by the word Hindu.
The definition of Hindu is not my self devised definition.
It is written in Sanskr’t dictionaries.
Shabd Kalpdrum/Raamkosh states:
‘Hindurdushtnr’h prokto’naary’neetividooshakah
Saddharmpaalako Vidvan Shrautdharmparaayanah.’
‘A Hindu is the one who never compromise with a wicked. He abolishes the wicked policies. He practices the religion of existence. He is full of wisdom. He is efficient in Dharm as preached in Ved.’
The other definitions of Hindu also follow this dictionary meaning:
‘Hinsaya dooyate chittam yasy’ tadapi hinasti dushtan yah s’ Hindurityabhidheeyate.’
‘One whose conscience does not feel at ease at violence, but nevertheless he kills a wicked is called a Hindu.’
You do not accept these authentic definitions of a Hindu and I am adamant that these are the only authentic definitions of a Hindu.

I am Hindu according to these authentic definitions.

Whenever I claim to be Hindu I always refer to these authentic definitions, not to an idolater.
You can see yourself there is nothing to associate idolatry with Hinduism in these definitions.

http://www.topix.com/forum/world/pakistan/T8IF30JQNC11F5L81/p17#c419

AAAA wrote:
<quoted text>
brother salman,
Can you ask your friend to quote a single verse or give any referance about the story he is telling about Rasool??
in the whole world the enemy of islam are manupulating and modifying the authentic islam shariah??
where did he read about this? is their any evidence??’

I replied:

‘So the hypocrite, calling hypocrite others, has not even read Seerat Sarvare Aalam(S) profoundly.
Yet, he claims that he follows him(S)!
Great! He follows the personality(S) he does not even know profoundly. And he declares others out of Islam!
Carry on!
You are exposing yourself in front of the entire Internet Community as more you are commenting on me.
Janab Salman Sahab! Have you also not studied Seerat Sarvare Aalam so profoundly?
I sympathize with all you people!
Learn what the real Islam is, before preaching it to others!’
http://www.topix.com/forum/world/pakistan/T8I…

I continued further:
Everybody has his own version of the ideology he practices.
You have not thought of it?
Well, think now!
Why did Hazrat Abu Bakr Siddiq(R) nominate Hazrat Umar(R) his janasheen Khaleefa while Huzoor(S) did not do it?
Why did the entire Muslim Community then, not opposed him(R) that he(R) is not following (?) Huzoor(S)?
Tell MR.AAAA to answer it.’

http://www.topix.com/forum/world/pakistan/T8IF30JQNC11F5L81/p20#c463

AAAA wrote:
‘brother salman,
Can you ask your friend to quote a single verse or give any referance about the story he is telling about Rasool??
in the whole world the enemy of islam are manupulating and modifying the authentic islam shariah??
where did he read about this? is their any evidence??’

http://www.topix.com/forum/world/pakistan/T8IF30JQNC11F5L81/p19#c458

Naturally, I smiled at it:
‘Well, the entire Internet Community must observe and notice that the hypocrite does not know even what Huzoor(s) did, when and why.
Instead of studying Seerat Sarvare Aalam(S) profoundly, he is preaching others what the Islam is and declaring others to be out of Islam.
Great!
‘Whenever it is said to them, “Spread not disorder on the earth”, their reply is, “We only seek to put things aright”.
Al Qur’ān Al Kareem: 2 Al Baqarah: 11
‘Beware! They do spread disorder but they realize it not.’
Al Qur’ān Al Kareem: 2 Al Baqarah: 12

http://www.topix.com/forum/world/pakistan/T8IF30JQNC11F5L81/p20#c464

Disparately AAAA wrote:
‘what is seerat savare Alaam, can you explain, we took our islamic teaching in Madinah munawarah university , we haven’t heard of this teaching or no Mutawaah nows about this, what is this??
and the 3 versus of surah Baqarah is surely implemented for you people.
(49. 15 )
: Only those are Believers who have believed in Allah and His Messenger, and have never since doubted, but have striven with their belongings and their persons in the Cause of Allah: Such are the sincere ones.
(49.17 )
: They impress on thee as a favour that they have embraced Islam. Say, “Count not your Islam as a favour upon me: Nay, Allah has conferred a favour upon you that He has guided you to the faith, if ye be true and sincere.’

http://www.topix.com/forum/world/pakistan/T8IF30JQNC11F5L81/p20#c465

I smiled again:
‘Still trying to save your face? You think all I reiterated never happened in the history?
Well, go through all the authentic versions of Seerat Sarvare Aalam.
All the authentic complete books on Seerat(S) contain it.
Study the great life of the Muhsine Insaniyat(S).
I promise you you will really enjoy it and it will enhance your Eiman, moreover.
Learn what the real Islam is yourself.
Don’t hear it from others.
Learn yourself.
Allah hafiz, mr.AAAA! you did not tell me your real name after all.
What is there to hide it?
Anyway, Allah hafiz!’

http://www.topix.com/forum/world/pakistan/T8IF30JQNC11F5L81/p20#c466

Panicked AAAA said frantically:
‘i don’t want to spoil my Iman by reading which was not taught to us from Allah & rasool.
we obey Allah & his messanger , QURAN & Hadith. thats it , the other books are for the people whose iman is not strong or for the munafikh.
as i told earlier by asking my name you want to run away from the topic, i m not interested in nowing real name too.
spread this fake knowledge of islam to those name sake muslims of your country whose iman is weak.
what is that seerat, sawareay and i don’t now what else, hahah
below ayat was released for people like you
CH:2 V:11
“WHEN WE SAYS TO THEM DON’T PLAY MISCHEIF ON EARTH, THEY SAY THEY ARE PEACE MAKERS”.
2 : 13
” When it is said to them: “Believe as the others believe:” They say: “Shall we believe as the fools believe?” Nay, of a surety they are the fools, but they do not know.
Masalaama Yakhi’

http://www.topix.com/forum/world/pakistan/T8IF30JQNC11F5L81/p20#c467

I laughed at him:
‘Look at him.
His Eiman is in danger if he reads Seerat Sarvare Aalam(S).
Great!
You are the unique person.
Repeating the Aayate Kareemat I quoted?
Well, children learn gradually.
Keep on to Watch my comments. You will learn more.’

http://www.topix.com/forum/world/pakistan/T8IF30JQNC11F5L81/p20#c468

Salman briefed the idiot AAAA:
‘AAAA,

Hazrat Zainab bint Jahsh(R) was a Muslim lady of the Qur’aish aristocracy and the Prophet’s cousin. On his request, she agreed to marry his freed slave and adopted son, Zaid Bin Haris(R). However the marriage was not successful, and ended in divorce. The Prophet, peace be upon him, subsequently married Zainab.

Durgesh,
The Matter between Hazrat Zainab bint Jahsh(R) and Zaid Bin Haris(R) was their internal matter there was no question of belief or disbelief by the way she didn’t marry a non-Muslim and Hazrat Muhammad (SAW) never gave punishment to any one on lawful personal matters. Islam permits a woman to marry with her own wish but not to a non-Muslim.

Don’t forget that Hazrat Muhammad (SAW) on many occasions had said that nobody is exempt from the rule of Islam even his dear daughter Fatima(R). For instance, when a woman named Fatima was brought to him with the charges of stealing. The holy prophet ordered to cut her hand. She prayed for mercy and forgiveness for her crime. He said that even if his daughter were there, he would have ordered the same because there’s no exemption in the rules of Islam.

Yes, Hazrat Abu Bakr Siddiq(R) nominated Hazrat Umar(R) his janasheen or Khaleefa so what is the point? There was no alteration in the religion if he had nominated Hazrat Umar(R).’

http://www.topix.com/forum/world/pakistan/T8IF30JQNC11F5L81/p20#c471

I said:
‘Salman! your real name ashamed friend AAAA is causing your intelligence also to diminish.
You were brilliant till now, but see how his foolish aura is affecting you now:
You write:
‘The Matter between Hazrat Zainab bint Jahsh(R) and Zaid Bin Haris(R) was their internal matter.’
Who said it was not? who said it was an external matter?
I have written:
‘Huzoor(S) wanted Hazrat Zainab bint Jahash(R) should not divorce his(S) slave Hazrat Zaid bin Haris, she(R) refused to agree with him(S).
What did he(S) do?
Declared her(R) out of Islam?
Said she(R) were not a Muslima anymore as she(R) refused to obey him(S)?
No! He(S) allowed her(S) what she wanted to do and married her(R) himself, even against all the criticism till now!
He did not impose his(S) version of Islam on anyone.
He preached Islam, not his(S) version of Islam.
You people claim to follow that great personalty(S).
Understand him(S) before you claim.’
It is clear from the excerpt itself that it was referred to explain why you people’s attitude differs with the attitude of Huzoor(S) so profoundly.
You are adamantly forcing your personal views and the views of outdated Muslim Badshahs in the name of Islam and insisting that if they are not accepted the person you are talking with is not a Muslim.
I gave an example that Huzoor(S) allowed even to differ with him(S).
He did not announce the persons are out of Islam.
In this context, there was no question of my marriage with a Saiyad Muslim girl, Saiyada Fatima PhD.
That question is separately answered by the answer of your question about what I would do with the idols.
I have answered that I would crush them if the law of the land permits me to do it.
With this final answer it is proved that I’m not a Non Muslim as you people are barking  ab initio.
Yet, you go on again to question the validity of our marriage.
Again starting from ABCD.
This great quality of never reading the answer, and going again and again repeating your question; was not in you, before.
Your friend AAAA had this great, full of wisdom, quality right from the beginning.
Now you are also developing it.
Great!
He is not improving. You are going down.
What a progress!

The question of nomination for Khilafat was also raised to prove the point that Huzoor(S) were more democrat than even Hazrat Abu Bakr Siddiq(R).
You missed it.
You never missed my point before .
It is the first time.
While your friend AAAA is so full of prejudices against me that he never got my any point.’

http://www.topix.com/forum/world/pakistan/T8IF30JQNC11F5L81/p20#c472

Salman wrote:
‘Durgesh!
I didn’t miss your point. May be I failed to convey my message, anyways the point which I was trying to convey is Yes, Hazrat Muhammad (SAW) didn’t announce that the people who don’t obey him are out of Islam but there are different type of matters for example if someone say something wrong about Hazrat Muhammad (SAW) he is out of Islam or if a Muslim woman marry a non-believer than the marriage is null and void (and I was not targeting you specifically it was an example)where as if someone steals something than you cannot say that he/she is out of Islam although it is a wrong act. The example of Hazrat Fatima (R) which I gave was because even Hazrat Muhammad (SAW) was bound to obey the Islamic law b/c it is the law of Allah.

I had seen your answer about idols. If you are a Muslim than I think you should declare it openly and if you can’t because of family and society and you are a Muslim who believes on only Allah than I m sorry for considering you a Hindu.’
He wrote further:
‘Again I am sorry if u are a Muslim and I hurt your feelings but this doesn’t mean than I am against Hindus that’s why after I m saying this after knowing that u r a Muslim no Muslim (including AAAA) is against Hinduism.’

http://www.topix.com/forum/world/pakistan/T8IF30JQNC11F5L81/p20#c474

I said:

‘Salman! I believe you. But your friend AAAA is a cheater. He/she defends vulgarism, acts judge and expels the persons out of Islam while he does not have any deep knowledge of Islam himself. His bluff must be called off. His attitude is dangerous to the society. Sorry! if you don’t agree with me.’

http://www.topix.com/forum/world/pakistan/T8IF30JQNC11F5L81/p20#c477

Salman said:
‘But Durgesh we need to figure out this issue .I have said that if you are a Muslim or if you were a Hindu and then you accepted Islam after that you married your wife its great. but what about a Muslim girl who is married to a Hindu guy? Their status of marriage is null and void according to Quran. isn’t it?’

http://www.topix.com/forum/world/pakistan/T8IF30JQNC11F5L81/p20#c478

AAAA said:
‘Brother Salman,
i can tell you the stories of many prophets here like people of Aad & samud during Saleh alaisalaam,Nuh alai salaam etc. but what i m trying to say is we have to follow shahada,
after reciting the shahada just believe in Allah and messenger thats it, A Role model for all the muslims should be only Muhammed SAW.
Allah Almighty warns the Muslims:
“O you who believe, if a wicked evildoer comes to you with a news
report, look carefully into it to verify the truth, lest you harm a
people in ignorance and afterwards feel remorseful for what you have
done.”
(Quran, 49:6)’

http://www.topix.com/forum/world/pakistan/T8IF30JQNC11F5L81/p20#c479

Salman replied AAAA:
‘AAAA,
I agree with you but we should answer Durgesh if he has some questions in his mind. There was a misunderstanding and I even thought that he is a Hindu but he has accepted that he is a Muslim and maybe he have some family or society problems that’s why he can’t declare openly that he is a Muslim.’

http://www.topix.com/forum/world/pakistan/T8IF30JQNC11F5L81/p20#c480

AAAA said:
‘Durgesh jabalpur wrote:
<quoted text>
Well, I invite all the so called Muslims who think they know and practice Islam better, to reply him.
As for me, I don’t think Islam also does preach violence.
It preaches violence only if there is no other way to remove inhumanity.
Well, Lord Bhagvan Ram, The Maryada Purushottam even, had to surrender to violence against Raxasas and their king Ravan.

Lord Bhagvan Kr’shn, also had to do the same against Kans, Duryodhan, Jarasandh, etc.
The only difference is they did not have any barbarism of Pre Islamic Arabs, as Islam had to face.
In Karbala, Yazeed Mal’oon revived that old Pre Islamic Arab barbarism.

All the later Muslim kings used it with the name of Islam.
Huzoor(S) lost his daughter’s son in Karbala.
So, he(S) was also a prey of this so called Jihad!
It was not Jihad.
It was a dirty political warfare and Islam is not responsible for it.
That, my friends! is my view.
You may discuss it, but I have a long history and Qur’ano Ahadeese Muqaddasat to support my view.’

AAAA argued desparately:
‘Can you quote us the Referance for any of the above? if its related to Islam as you are mention Islam , Islam again & again?
the below even though you understand you wont go with it i know but still, as i told earlier….
Don’t judge a car by its driver:
If you want to judge how good is the latest model of the “Mercedes” car and a person who does not know how to drive sits at the steering wheel and bangs up the car, who will you blame? The car or the driver? But naturally, the driver. To analyze how good the car is, a person should not look at the driver but see the ability and features of the car. How fast is it, what is its average fuel consumption, what are the safety measures, etc. Even if I agree for the sake of argument that the Muslims are bad, we can’t judge Islam by its followers? If you want to judge how good Islam is then judge it according to its authentic sources, i.e. the Glorious Qur’an and the Sahih Hadith.
. Judge Islam by its best follower i.e. Prophet Mohammed (pbuh):
If you practically want to check how good a car is put an expert driver behind the steering wheel. Similarly the best and the most exemplary follower of Islam by whom you can check how good Islam is, is the last and final messenger of God, Prophet Muhammad (pbuh). Besides Muslims, there are several honest and unbiased non-Muslim historians who have acclaimed that prophet Muhammad was the best human being. According to Michael H. Hart who wrote the book,‘The Hundred Most Influential Men in History’, the topmost position, i.e. the number one position goes to the beloved prophet of Islam, Muhammad (pbuh). There are several such examples of non-Muslims paying great tributes to the prophet, like Thomas Carlyle, La-Martine, etc
” Only those are Believers who have believed in Allah and His Messenger, and have never since doubted, but have striven with their belongings and their persons in the Cause of Allah: Such are the sincere ones”.
QURAN (49. 15 )’

http://www.topix.com/forum/world/pakistan/T8IF30JQNC11F5L81/p22#c508

My response:
‘Well, look at her.
She/he is unable to understand what I wrote.
What did you understand the great believer in Islam! that you want the proof of?
Whether there was no Karbala?
Was Yazeed Mal’oon not its villain?
Was Yazeed not supported by his father Hazrat Myavia(R)?
Did Hazrat Myavia(R) not claim he(R) were right?
Was he(R)not responsible for the end of Khilafate Rashida thus?
Were Hazrat Myavia(R) also a real khaleefa as Hazrat Abu Bakr Siddiq(R) were? as Hazrat Umar (R) were? as Hazrat Usman ghani (R) were? as Hazrat Ali (R) were?
If not, for what are you asking proof?
As you claim, you are the only true Muslim left in the world now.
All the others are Munafiqeen or liable to be expelled from Islam.
Answer him gravely.
Let’s see what the Efficient Ms/Mr AAAA has to say.’

http://www.topix.com/forum/world/pakistan/T8IF30JQNC11F5L81/p22#c509

Salman tried to mediate:
‘The problem is people often relate freedom struggles and terrorism(they both are different things) with Islam. If you people can see that how Palestine,Kashmir,Iraq are under occupation and people used to relate their struggle with violence.
People often choose that part of the religion which suits them. Extremes on either side are harmful if we say that Yazeed was right it is false and if we say that Mughal emperor Akbar was right than it is also wrong.
We can take the example of Muhammad Bin Qasim who was forced to attach sindh but later on he proved that he was a good ruler.
About Hazrat Amir Muawiya(R) supporting Yazeed is a disputed issue and different schools of thoughts of Islam have their own view on this.’

http://www.topix.com/forum/world/pakistan/T8IF30JQNC11F5L81/p22#c512

Further:
‘Durgesh,
I condemn the nick of that guy against India but some other Indians use vulgur language against Pakistan we should condemn them all.

Similarly as you cannot hear something against India we can’t hear any thing against Pakistan.’

http://www.topix.com/forum/world/pakistan/T8IF30JQNC11F5L81/p22#c513

I said:
‘if we say that Yazeed was right it is false and if we say that Mughal emperor Akbar was right than it is also wrong.’
So you compare Yazeed Mal’oon with Akbar?
What are the similarities,you have found, in both of them?
Yazeed Mal’oon was a blood hound.

Akbar was a person of peace.
Yazeed destroyed the great humanistic movement of Islam, continued so far by the great martyr Kaleefas Hazrat Abu Bakr Siddiq(R), Hazrat Umar (R), Hazrat Usman ghani (R), and Hazrat Ali (R).
He is the villain of entire humanity.
The entire humankind must condemn Yazeed Mal’oon forever.
It was Yazeed Mal’oon who destroyed the dreams of Huzoor(S).
He revived the old Arab barbarism in the disguise of Islam.
It was the first political misuse of the name of Islam.
The later Muslim kings misutilized it again and again for their own vested dirty political interests.
Yazeed Mal’oon provided them the role model.
The case of Akbar is exactly opposite.
He hated the violence in the so called Islam.
He tried to stop Bairam Khan to kill Hemu or Hemchandr Vikramadity’ as his full name was.
Bairam Khan did not stop and killed Hemu or Hemchandr Vikramadity‘ in the name of Islam.
Akbar was shocked.
He could not imagine why it was necessary.
In his ignorance, he started to hate Islam, while he should have hated the so called Muslims of the time who were blood hounds.
None told Bairam Khan how Muhsine Insaniyat(S) forgave his(S) and even Islam’s worst enemies so far when Makka was won.
It is not highlighted ever as it does not suit the vile purposes of the transgressors.
Huzoor(S) are painted in front of non Muslims as if he(S) were also (Nauzbillah!) a blood hound like them.’

http://www.topix.com/forum/world/pakistan/T8IF30JQNC11F5L81/p22#c515

Further:
‘I understand. And I respect your patriotism.
I condemn all the vulgarities.
However, I expect Muslims to behave more responsibly:
Do not revile those whom they invoke other than Allah, because they will revile Allah in ignorance out of spite.’
Al Qur’an Al Majeed: 6 Al An’am 108.
Will the Muslims be forgiven, for not obeying Al Qur’an Al Majeed, on the ground that the non Muslims did not obey it?
The forum is being watched internationally.
What is the character of a Muslim it depicting?
Should Muslims don’t watch themselves?
They are representative of Islam.
Should they not act more responsibly?
May Allah Rabbil Aalmeen bless all of us.’

http://www.topix.com/forum/world/pakistan/T8IF30JQNC11F5L81/p22#c516

AAAA tried to defend himself in vain:
‘this is MR AAAA , what her or she you are using.
just you tell me one thing , what is that you are trying to proof? you believe in ALlah but you are not a muslim?
what is that you are trying to proof? this doesn’t say your are confused guy?
: Only those are Believers who have believed in Allah and His Messenger, and have never since doubted, but have striven with their belongings and their persons in the Cause of Allah: Such are the sincere ones.
QURAN (49. 15 )
QURAN : 5: 36
” As to those who reject Faith,- if they had everything on earth, and twice repeated, to give as ransom for the penalty of the Day of Judgment, it would never be accepted of them, theirs would be a grievous penalty:.
QURAN : 5: 3
”Their wish will be to get out of the Fire, but never will they get out therefrom: their penalty will be one that endures”.’
http://www.topix.com/forum/world/pakistan/T8I…

Further:
‘Tell me one thing , which is the first month according to Islam ? what does Youmal Aashur means??

as you talk about karbala and all a lot??

CH:2 V:11

“WHEN WE SAYS TO THEM DON’T PLAY MISCHEIF ON EARTH, THEY SAY THEY ARE PEACE MAKERS”.’

http://www.topix.com/forum/world/pakistan/T8IF30JQNC11F5L81/p22#c518

I said:
‘Answer me first. You can’t just bark anything and run away.
First, answer me and then I’ll answer your new questions.
I repeat my questions for your ready reference:
‘Well, look at her.
She/he is unable to understand what I wrote.
What did you understand the great believer in Islam! that you want the proof of?
Whether there was no Karbala?
Was Yazeed Mal’oon not its villain?
Was Yazeed not supported by his father Hazrat Myavia(R)?
Did Hazrat Myavia(R) not claim he(R) were right?
Was he(R)not responsible for the end of Khilafate Rashida thus?
Were Hazrat Myavia(R) also a real khaleefa as Hazrat Abu Bakr Siddiq(R) were? as Hazrat Umar (R) were? as Hazrat Usman ghani (R) were? as Hazrat Ali (R) were?
If not, for what are you asking proof?
As you claim, you are the only true Muslim left in the world now.
All the others are Munafiqeen or liable to be expelled from Islam.
Answer him gravely.’

http://www.topix.com/forum/world/pakistan/T8IF30JQNC11F5L81/p22#c519

AAAA said:
‘you may be having knowledge about the kings , why do you want to twist things with others.
their are only 4 companians and muslims ROLE MODEL should be only Muhammed SAW thats it.
if you want i can tell you the stories like the Flow chart about all the Ibn ADAM. we are not interested in it,
bottom line believe in Allah and his messenger .
don’t make things complicated and create misconception about islam.’

http://www.topix.com/forum/world/pakistan/T8IF30JQNC11F5L81/p22#c520
I said:
‘You are the greatest enemy of Islam and the people alike.
You don’t go to the principles. You go to history and call it Islam.
Don’t tell me what Islam is. I know more than you and I have already proved it in this very Forum.
I can understand you.
You are afraid of me.
You want to keep me out and the people alike of discussing Islam.
It brings all the munafiqeen like you in broad daylight.
I am not afraid of you.
I am not shy of my real name even like you are.
So ashamed of your real name you are that you keep it secret still now.
Why?
Are your name involved with activities dangerous to the humanity as a whole?
Is is famous for gay activities?
What is there you are so ashamed of?
You have shamelessly followed your tradition:
‘why do you want to twist things with others.’
I challenge you.
Prove what I have twisted.
The entire sophisticated Internet Society has watched you and me both.
Everything is written and recorded.
Prove me wrong in anything I have written.
It’s an open challenge to you.
I’m calling your bluff openly.
Meet it.
Go through all my 606 comments and prove me wrong if I have written something injurious to humanity.
You munafiq!
You can’t do it.’

http://www.topix.com/forum/world/pakistan/T8IF30JQNC11F5L81/p22#c521

the things made Fard(obligatory) people take it easy on stupied things spend their life.

& over all why you are interested in it, when you are not a muslim, not want to be muslims???

REFERENCE IS VERY IMPORTANT , specially in this generation, because enemy of islams are every were & we don’t trust the words which are coming out of their mouth.

masalaama

AAAA desparately tried to save his face:
‘you know islam more then me that is the reason you are HINDU-Disbeliever i think??how diplomatic,
you follow that king what was his name some AKBER , better you follow him.
the name itself is a shirk, muhammed akber, Unawzibillah. good this is what you understand about islam, always talking about history of this sort of people and xpressing you know Islam.
very good knowledge about islam you have????’

http://www.topix.com/forum/world/pakistan/T8IF30JQNC11F5L81/p22#c522

I challenged the hypocrite:
‘Again running away?
What about my challenge?
Prove in my 610 comments anything injurious to humanity.
Also prove in all those 610 comments anything against Qur’ano ahadeese muqaddasat.
One more thing!
Prove in all those 610 comments of mine anything against Ved.
You can’t prove it.
So, I have everything there according to Ved, according to Qur’ano ahadeese muqaddasat, according to humanity.
Prove otherwise.
What more a person need for a happy life?’

http://www.topix.com/forum/world/pakistan/T8IF30JQNC11F5L81/p22#c523

AAAA said:
‘enjoying and getting pleased by the opposite sex even though its against the religion fundamental against the creator then also you go with it.
Hello.. sorry you are conversing with wrong guy.
creator the almigty is more important to us .
that doesn’t mean we are not taking about humanity , islam means peace but don’t create misconception about islam just to impress or pleased humans , i hope you understand .
thats all you cannot understand it as for that you have to be beleiver first,
QURAN (49. 15 )
: Only those are Believers who have believed in Allah and His Messenger, and have never since doubted, but have striven with their belongings and their persons in the Cause of Allah: Such are the sincere ones.
In yansurkumu Allahu fala ghaliba lakum wa-in yakhthulkum faman tha allathee yansurukum min baAAdihi waAAala Allahi falyatawakkali almu/minoona
If Allah helps you, none can overcome you: If He forsakes you, who is there, after that, that can help you? in Allah, then, Let believers put their trust.
Surah Imran :(3:160)’

http://www.topix.com/forum/world/pakistan/T8IF30JQNC11F5L81/p22#c524

I admitted:
‘Now, at last, we are getting somewhere with this queer person!
He/She writes:
‘enjoying and getting pleased by the opposite sex even though its against the religion fundamental against the creator then also you go with it.’
He is humiliated by opposite sex perhaps and he can’t bear any person getting pleased with the opposite sex.
It is the root cause why he is so against me.
He can’t bear my extra ordinary success with the opposite sex.
Particularly, if the opposite sex is the Muslimat.
Well, I did not rape them for your kind information.
I did not go around or behind them.
I am a professional free lance writer and I don’t despise sex as you despise it.
You despise sex because you can’t get it.
I love sex because I was always offered the same from the kind and loving opposite sex.
Yes, Muslimat.
Arab Muslimat even.
They offered it, I honored them.
I don’t know what they found in me.
I don’t know what was unique in me for them.
I always asked them.
They told me I have abnormal sex capability.
They told me I love sex while their males detest it. According to them it was the unique thing I have.
Well, they offered themselves to me and I honored them.
What should have I done?
Refused to them as Hazrat Yusuf (AS) refused to Zulekha and went to Jail?
I am not Hazrat Yusuf(AS).
I never claimed to be.
He(AS) was a great personality.
I can’t even imagine to compete with him.
I respect him(AS).
Nevertheless, I am a simple and normal man.
I do not have his(AS) approach to the almighty.
If I would have to go to jail, I don’t think there will be any dream to the rulers of the day to take me out of jail.
I am not that important to the Creator as Hazrat Yusuf (AS) were.
What do you want?
I should have gone to jail instead?
Well,I refuse.
Yes, I enjoyed and still enjoy the opposite sex offered to me by themselves.
So what?
It is our, I repeat, OUR, PERSONAL MATTER.
They wanted to enjoy sex with me.
I honored their kind and only human wishes.
Why is it crime against the Creator?
No. It was not.
I did not rape them.
They did not rape me.
What happened, happened with mutual consent.
We all enjoyed it very much.
If Creator had not approved of it, He could have stopped us, as easily as He can.
You feel humiliated because they are Muslimat.
Why should you?
You are not their guardian.
Even if you were, they are adults themselves.
They have all rights on their own bodies.
Certainly, you can’t claim that they did not have the rights you have.
And if you want religious confirmation, I have it here:
‘Udyachchhadhvamap raxo hanathemam
nareem sukr’te dadhat.’
‘Stand up! make the wicked run away beating him up. Give this woman to the man who does noble deeds.’
Ved: 4 Atharvved: Kand 14: Sookt 1: Mantr 59.’
I follow Ved. I am a Hindu. I never denied it.’

I admitted:
‘Now, at last, we are getting somewhere with this queer person!
He/She writes:
‘enjoying and getting pleased by the opposite sex even though its against the religion fundamental against the creator then also you go with it.’
He is humiliated by opposite sex perhaps and he can’t bear any person getting pleased with the opposite sex.
It is the root cause why he is so against me.
He can’t bear my extra ordinary success with the opposite sex.
Particularly, if the opposite sex is the Muslimat.
Well, I did not rape them for your kind information.
I did not go around or behind them.
I am a professional free lance writer and I don’t despise sex as you despise it.
You despise sex because you can’t get it.
I love sex because I was always offered the same from the kind and loving opposite sex.
Yes, Muslimat.
Arab Muslimat even.
They offered it, I honored them.
I don’t know what they found in me.
I don’t know what was unique in me for them.
I always asked them.
They told me I have abnormal sex capability.
They told me I love sex while their males detest it. According to them it was the unique thing I have.
Well, they offered themselves to me and I honored them.
What should have I done?
Refused to them as Hazrat Yusuf (AS) refused to Zulekha and went to Jail?
I am not Hazrat Yusuf(AS).
I never claimed to be.
He(AS) was a great personality.
I can’t even imagine to compete with him.
I respect him(AS).
Nevertheless, I am a simple and normal man.
I do not have his(AS) approach to the almighty.
If I would have to go to jail, I don’t think there will be any dream to the rulers of the day to take me out of jail.
I am not that important to the Creator as Hazrat Yusuf (AS) were.
What do you want?
I should have gone to jail instead?
Well,I refuse.
Yes, I enjoyed and still enjoy the opposite sex offered to me by themselves.
So what?
It is our, I repeat, OUR, PERSONAL MATTER.
They wanted to enjoy sex with me.
I honored their kind and only human wishes.
Why is it crime against the Creator?
No. It was not.
I did not rape them.
They did not rape me.
What happened, happened with mutual consent.
We all enjoyed it very much.
If Creator had not approved of it, He could have stopped us, as easily as He can.
You feel humiliated because they are Muslimat.
Why should you?
You are not their guardian.
Even if you were, they are adults themselves.
They have all rights on their own bodies.
Certainly, you can’t claim that they did not have the rights you have.
And if you want religious confirmation, I have it here:
‘Udyachchhadhvamap raxo hanathemam
nareem sukr’te dadhat.’
‘Stand up! make the wicked run away beating him up. Give this woman to the man who does noble deeds.’
Ved: 4 Atharvved: Kand 14: Sookt 1: Mantr 59.’
I follow Ved. I am a Hindu. I never denied it.’

http://www.topix.com/forum/world/pakistan/T8IF30JQNC11F5L81/p22#c525

AAAA said:
‘by your comments we can make out what kind of a guy you are pleasure seekers.
as you just want SEX thats it, for that you want to utilise this and gain the trust and attack them from behind, i can make it out.
it useless conversing with you,
we go for Halaal thing not for HARAAM,
HARAAM IS you life style . as alhamdulila i m muslims i go for Halaal.
this is the difference between you & US.’

http://www.topix.com/forum/world/pakistan/T8IF30JQNC11F5L81/p23#c533

http://www.topix.com/forum/world/pakistan/T8IF30JQNC11F5L81/p20#c480

DAK London, UK commented:
‘Mutauly consented sex should not be anyone’s business. Of course the parties invovled sshould not hurt innocent third party’s stake when they are already invovled. however, the decision is theirs.
Sex in this way is not like killing or incitement to killing. But rape should be haram, even after military conquests.
How many of elder Pakistani soldiers took part in rapes in foramer East Pakistan? How many brought to justice? Was that halal or haram?’

http://www.topix.com/forum/world/pakistan/T8IF30JQNC11F5L81/p23#c534

I said:
‘I copy paste what Dak has written.
You may take it as my answer to you too:
Mutauly consented sex should not be anyone’s business. Of course the parties invovled sshould not hurt innocent third party’s stake when they are already invovled. however, the decision is theirs.
Sex in this way is not like killing or incitement to killing. But rape should be haram, even after military conquests.
How many of elder Pakistani soldiers took part in rapes in foramer East Pakistan? How many brought to justice? Was that halal or haram?’

http://www.topix.com/forum/world/pakistan/T8IF30JQNC11F5L81/p23#c539

I thanked Dak too:
‘Thank you my friend!

http://www.topix.com/forum/world/pakistan/T8IF30JQNC11F5L81/p23#c540

I said further:
‘While the answer, DAK provided, is the complete answer to him, let’s analyze his comment.
This person is profoundly jealous of me because perhaps the opposite sex has rejected him entirely .
Yet, the same opposite sex is ravenous to have me to the extent that even no religious prohibition can stop them from it.
Let’s analyze why it is so.
AAA is unable to understand that some males have exceptionally abnormal sexual capabilities.
It is a fact and no fact can be argued.
A fact is a fact.
One has to accept it.
Even if it is rejected, the fact remains a fact nevertheless.
Similarly, AAAA cannot understand that there are some females who have abnormal sexual lust.(Contd.
http://www.topix.com/forum/world/pakistan/T8I…
He must go through:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_male_sexua…
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Masculinity
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Machismo
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phallus
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phallic_symbol#I…
From his so far communal and immensely illogical posts I doubt he will ever go through these links.
However, it will help the persons interested to understand my wife, me and my female friends more:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_female_sex…
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hypersexuality
This post is for analytical purpose only.
He does not need to answer it.

http://www.topix.com/forum/world/pakistan/T8IF30JQNC11F5L81/p23#c546

Challenger India responded:

Durgesh jabalpur wrote:
Sidrah Bombay, India said:
‘Salman wrote:
‘About Namaz Hazrat Muhammad (SAW) said that “the only difference between a believer and a non-believer is Namaz”.’
So in that case, you do agree that a person who observes salat is not a kaafir, right?

Who is sidrah? Who is salman? What is the background of this statement?’

http://www.topix.com/forum/religion/hindu/TP2P6FRCNPV69P5ND/p3#c46

I replied:

Read original posts.
I’ve given continuous links everywhere.
Ask Salman for the statement.

http://www.topix.com/forum/religion/hindu/TP2P6FRCNPV69P5ND/p3#c48

Challenger was too moron to understand my post. He asked again:

Which posts? Give reference names. Mr. Salman! Who is this Salman?

http://www.topix.com/forum/religion/hindu/TP2P6FRCNPV69P5ND/p3#c49

Naturally, He was ashamed of the realization that what say is stark naked TRUTH:

Most Present day Muslms don’t do what Huzoor(SAW) did.

Satyamev jayte naanr’tam.

Ultimately, Truth prevails.

‘Fabiayyi aalaai Rabbikumaa tukazzibaani’

Which of the bounties of your Lordwill you, twain, then deny?’

–Al Qur’an Al Kareem: 55 Ar-Rahman|13-77.

————————————————————————————————————————————-

More on Islam from DSM Sayarthi:

1. Bal huv qur’anum majeedun fe LAUHIM MAHFOOZIN

2. Innahu laquranun kareemun Fee kitabin maknoonin

3. ‘Hudallilmuttaqeen’: ‘Guidance for controllers of organs’: 2 Al Baqarah: 2

4. ‘Alaa qalbik litakoon minal-munzireen’ ‘upon your heart one of who to warn’

5. Muslimahs! Come to India. I recommend Hindu lovers for all the Muslimahs.: Khadeejah Muhammad

6. Islam according to Qur’an and Maulana Maududi rahamatullh alaihi