Al Muħammad Al Qāsim’s utmost greedy relatives

Some of my readers have taken the trouble to inform me that an article of Ayesha Ahmed is not available to them when they click the link I’ve given to them in some of my writings.

I don’t know why it is so, if it is so.

However, I copy paste that article here for their, as well as others’ benefit, as I have previously did for some of the writings of my intimate friends Khadijah Muhammad and Sidrah Ahmad:

Privileged Position

by Ayesha Ahmed : Aug 2, 2003 :

4 Comments

Dear sisters: How many times have you heard this claim “sisters, you should be very happy that you have a very high status and a very privileged position in our religion” by the bearded ones in the mosques?

God alone knows what high status and which privileged position they talk about….

To be declared in the holy books that we are deficient in intelligence and that most of us will go to hell for being ungrateful to our husbands; and that we will make the big majority of the hell’s population?

To be told to share the husband with three other wives and many concubines, sex slaves and captive women which his right hand posses?

To be divorced by him at the drop of a hat by just his proclaiming 3 times “I divorce you” and we not having the same right to divorce him?

Husband getting 72 perpetually virgin beautiful houris with big eyes and swelling bosoms in the paradise and we getting the same old husband and share him with the 72 voluptuous houris? (Believe me sisters; he will be so busy there with the lovely houris that the only time he will see you will be in the hallways when he is going from one houri’s room to another houri’s room).

To be disciplined by the husband, by being beaten up by him with scourge (lash) and green sticks? (Unless you are into the kinky stuff and actually enjoy the beatings)..

Being raped and then be stoned to death for reporting it because you need 4 male witnesses to prove your innocence otherwise you yourself get accused of adultery? (Your only chance of finding 4 male witnesses is that if the attacker was of very low IQ or was really drunk and attacked you in the broad daylight in front of a bunch of degenerate horny men who watched and cheered and are later willing to testify)

Being wrongly accused of adultery by a conniving husband and be stoned for it because he does not need 4 male witnesses if he swears 4 times himself?

Being married at the age of 9 years to a much older man because it is sunna? To submit to him every time he desires you even if he wants it on the back of a camel, if he gets an untimely urge? (Not recommended, you both may fall down from camel’s back during the action and sustain injuries).

Being cursed all night by thousands of angels if you refuse him even for a genuine reason? (What a boring job for angels who are assigned to watch your bedroom, always waiting for the action, unless of course they enjoy watching; in that case they have a reason to be disappointed and pissed by your refusal).

To be declared half a person as witness in court or inheriting property?

To be asked to stay at home by scriptures and only leave home if husband permits; that too fully covered by a tent like garment even if it is scorching hot (hey, sweating is good for you as it opens skin pores, besides the tent covering protects you from the hot sun and elements which keeps you fair and beautiful; sisters you need all the help you can get to compete with the other wives and concubines).

The Muslim Beauties are wooing Hindu Men FASTEST

—————————————————————————————

More from DSM Satyarthi:

1. Commentary on Ved

2. More On Hinduism

3. On Islam

4. On History

5. Science Fiction

6. Creative Adult Sex in English from Durgesh

7. Durgesh in Hindi/Urdu

Dév Ānand to Amitābh Bachchan

Feb28

Dév Ānand to Amitābh

Bachchan

DSM Satyarthi

Generally, the media presents the Indian Cine History keeping the box office into its central point of view.

Of course, if the commercial point of view is taken into consideration, it’s necessary.

But why should there a Multiversalist Humanist, as I am, study the same from commercial point of view?

I don’t.

I never.

Instead, moreover, I refuse to do so.

Instead, I study it, as I peruse everything else too, with the point of view to its worth to humanity.

I think we human beings should peruse everything with the same point of view.

So, I think Dév Ānand and Rāj Kapoor have contributed to humanity more than our tragedy king Dilip Kumar has.

The media writes Dilip Dév Raj trio.

I write Dév Raj Dilip trio.

I keep Dilip at the third place, not because I’m communal.

I put Sāħir Ludhiyānvī at the top when I write about Indian cine lyricists.

How was it possible if I were a communal?

I put Jāvéd Akħtar after Sāħir Ludhiyānvī even, not Ānand Baxī.

How was it possible if I were a communal?

I put Dr. APJ Abdul Kalām at the top when I write about the Presidents of India, not any Hindu whosoever he may be.

How was it possible if I were a communal?

No, I’m not communal.

I hate communalism instead.

From a humanist point of view, Dév Ānand and Rāj Kapoor have contributed to humanity more than Dilip Kumar has.

Of course, Dilip Kumar has contributed to box office more than Dév Ānand and Rāj Kapoor have.

But to humanity, Dilip Kumar has contributed less.

Tragedy clicked at the box office, those days, instead of the highest jubilant attitude of great Dév Ānand towards life and the highest constructive attitude of great Raj Kapoor towards the same, because most of the Indians those days were sufferers.

India had gotten its independence recently.

The sufferers identified themselves with Dilip Kumar’s tragedies more than with the highest jubilant attitude of great Dév Ānand towards life and the highest constructive attitude of great Raj Kapoor towards the same.

Divine Rajendr Kumar was out of question consequently then, even irrespective of his being Jubilee Kumar.

Even Sophisticated Ashok Kumar and Raj Kumar had lost at box office to the tragedies of Dilip Kumar.

The sufferers kept identifying themselves with the tragedies of Dilip Kumar.

Yet, as India progressed, the sufferers lost their majority.

It was the reason the tragedies of Dilip Kumar started to flop ultimately.

The life survives in jubilation, elation, triumph, joyousness, delight and euphoria, not in tragedies.

It is the reason the highest jubilant attitude of great Dév Ānand towards life and the highest constructive attitude of great Raj Kapoor towards the same, survived on the tragedies of Dilip Kumar and is still surviving.

It was the reason the ever first super star Rajesh Khanna with all the highest jubilant attitude of great Dév Ānand towards life and the highest constructive attitude of great Raj Kapoor towards the same, even with the singer Kishore Kumar of Dév Ānand, soon replaced the tragedies of Dilip Kumar.

Rajesh Khanna had the great divinity of Rajendr Kumar and sophistication of Ashok Kumar and Raj Kumar too.

Dilip Kumar had no alternative to lose to Rajesh Khanna.

Yet, Rajesh Khanna too had the same loser morals of the tragedies of Dilip Kumar.

Dilip Kumar acknowledged and honoured the success of Rajesh Khanna using his singer Kishore Kumar himself in Sagina.

Rajesh Khanna was the super cocktail of the highest jubilant attitude of great Dév Ānand towards life, the highest constructive attitude of great Raj Kapoor, divinity of Rajendr Kumar and the tragedies of Dilip Kumar.

It was the mystery of the success of great Rajesh Khanna on the tragedies of Dilip Kumar.

Yet, he had the same loser ethics, the tragedies of our tragedy king Dilip Kumar had.

Amitabh Bachchan succeeded in getting rid of it too.

Hence, the ultimate defeat of great Rajesh Khanna to even greater Amitabh Bachchan.

Amitabh Bachchan as he rose taller and taller, the tallest ultimately, was never a loser even as Rajesh Khanna was.

—————————————————————————————————————————————

More audio musical blogs from DSM Satyarthi:

1. Zindagi, aa raha hoon main

2. Zindagi ik safar hai suhana

3. Jo tum hansoge

4. Har Chehrā yahān chānd to har zarrā sitarā

5. Main jahan chala jaaoon, bahaar chali aaye

6. Socha tha pyar hum na karenge

7. The Star of the millennium: Amitabh Bachchan

8. Man re, tu kaahe n’ dheer dhare?

Man ré tū kahé n’ dheer dharé?

Feb10

Man ré tū kahé n’ dheer dharé?

an interesting audio musical blog:

Just listen to, and enjoy

Click the links to some popular songs, in an interesting specific sequence.

Enjoy the songs as if a different video audio story, implying an alogether different sense:

DSM Satyarthi

Family in Hinduism and West

Jun21

Family in Hinduism and West

DSM Satyarthi

Some of the Hindus are blindly imitating the West without thinking, without paying proper attention to it, and even without studying it properly.

Hinduism/Ved does not want us to imitate anyone blindly.

Our basic Mantr even is Gāyatrī Mantr.

It instructs us not to follow even Ved blindly.

It says:

‘Dhiyo yo nah prachodayāt’.

‘Who impel our wisdoms.’

Thus, even Ved must be understood and followed using our wisdoms, ‘dhiyah’, not blindly.

Moreover, it must be understood and followed according to facts:

‘Yāthātathyatah.’

I can’t understand how even the educated persons behave so foolishly and so childishly, as they do unfortunately.

Everything that shines is not gold, and neither it can ever be.

Here, I must clarify myself that I’m not advising here the persons who never update themselves, on their own, before following/imitating others.

In India, it was unfortunate that Mahatma Gandhi was praised very much by Congress, but was never followed.

Did Jawahar Lal Nehru/Congress follow Gandhi ever?

Never.

Both Nehru/Congress only used Gandhi for their own vested political interests.

Nehru was not as patriotic as the Congress publicize for its ever undemocratic vile political interests.

His clothes were being washed in Paris.

It was Nehru’s patriotism.

Why?

Ask the blind praisers of Nehru and his ever-undemocratic family.

Didn’t India have enough washerpersons to wash Nehru’s clothes?

Or did India lack enough water?

The patriotism of Nehru and his ever-undemocratic family is ridiculous when we study it unemotionally.

It’s unfortunate that a large number of Indians still make their decisions emotionally, rather than rationally.

It was one of the main reasons we had gone to slavery.

Yet, we haven’t learned, even from our own history, even now.

Gandhi wanted the Congress to be dissolved as soon as India is free.

It was never done.

Why?

Why Nehru/Congress did not follow Gandhi in the matter?

Because Nehru/Congress never were as foolish as to follow Gandhi’s impractical ways.

They always used Gandhi, never followed him.

In Nehru’s/Congress’ own opinion, Gandhi was never practical.

They always obeyed Gandhi when it was in their own personal benefit.

They never obeyed Gandhi when it was not in their own personal benefit.

After independence, Nehru/Congress never tried to change our Education System.

Why?

Because it suited their vile political purposes.

It was easy for them to follow the policies their predecessors, the British, adopted to control their realm.

Congress only replaced them, nothing else, actually important, was changed

In the name of protecting minorities, Nehru/Congress always tried to widen the social gap between Hindus and Musalmeen.

They acted as shrewd as the British did in their time.

The British, after 1857, never lost any chance to make Hindus and Musalmeen fight with each other.

So did Nehru/Congress after independence.

The family also suffered from the same policy.

In British India, the British were always after breaking the strongest Hindu family.

They encouraged Hindus to marry Musalmān Beauties and British Beauties even on this or that pretext.

The Hindus who married Musalmān Beauties and British Beauties were given recognition, money and wealth.

They were dearer to the British and Musalmeen both.

Nehru was as romantic as his father, Motilal Nehru, was.

It’s always suspected that Sheikħ Åbdullah was in fact, Motilal Nehru’s son from his romantic extramarital affair with Sheikħ Åbdullah’s extra ordinary beautiful Ammīs.

Counter Revolution

May13

Counter Revolution

DSM Satyarthi

1. Why does counter-revolution take place even to the best revolution, sooner or later?

2. What can be done to stop it for ever?

3. Even the best revolution can’t convert everyone to his/her optimum.

4. The part less optimum, in everyone, is negligent, at least somewhat, to the persons who were not with the revolution, but now have submitted, due to the success of the revolution.

4. The persons against revolution capitalize on it.

5. They build their strategy on it to counter revolt.

6. How did it happen with Islam , and why and how did Yazīd Malåūn succeed?

7. Why did Ħazrat Ålī^rzu not revolt against Ħazrat Siddīq-e-Åāzam^rzu, Ħazrat Fārūq- e-Åāzam^rzu and Ħazrat Ůsmān Ghanī^rzu?

Get all the answers in the great historical novel ‘Counter Revolution’ from DSM Satyarthi

Coming soon @ the link below:

Counter Revolution