DSM Satyarthi
—————————————————————————————————————
1By Som Ādityās strong2 by Som Earth great3
No doubt4, in the genital organ of these constellations5, Som is established optimum6.
————————————————————————————————–
1.R’shikā: Sūryā Sāvitrī
Dévtā/ Divine Subject: Som
Chhand/Meter: Anushŧup
2. Ved is revealed in a telegraphic language, not in any ordinary language.
This basic fact, about Ved, always must be remembered while studying Ved gravely.
I’m sorry to say that the Westerners never studied Ved gravely.
I’m sorrier to say that the Westerners were never serious not only about Ved.
They were never equally serious about Bible and Qur’an too, as well.
These scriptures were never seriously studied by the Westerners.
If they were ever studied seriously, by the Westerners; the Western Culture, now on the path of its certain suicide, would never were on its suicidal path.
It was an unfortunate tragedy that when Ved, Bible and Qur’an were being studied by the Westerners, the Communism was fighting its own war of survival with religion.
It made the Communist thinkers more biased those days than they are not biased even today.
No biased studies should be taken seriously ever.
Yet, isn’t it a tragedy that, the entirely biased studies of those days, by the Communist thinkers are still being taken seriously?
Isn’t it a time to re-study Ved, Bible, Qur’an and the related literature more seriously, scientifically and absolutely unbiased, for a change?
We have one more benefit the Communist thinkers of those days didn’t have.
The Communism in those days was utopian somewhat, even after the great scientific studies Karl Marx and Frederick Engels did then.
It was not a scientific fact, known those days that, the Multiverse is made of vibrations of energy basically.
This fact, revealed and accepted scientifically afterwards, has changed the entire scenario of scientific studies about the matters the Communist thinkers had done their studies.
Marriage institution is also one of them.
The persons who have studied Western Culture seriously know very well that the Western Culture does not stand on scientific grounds only.
In fact, no culture can ever stand on scientific grounds only howsoever it insists to stand.
Any theory, any fact, when it is brought into practice always succumbs to human emotions prevailing those days.
It has to.
It hasn’t another option if it has to come into practice.
Humans never react scientifically only.
Neither can they ever do it.
Scientific facts are never emotional until they are facts only.
As soon as they are brought into practice they have to deal with the humans.
Humans include both males and females.
Not only females are emotional ones, the males are also not very different in the matter.
No doubt, the females are more emotionals than the males.
Nevertheless, even the males are not devoid of emotions absolutely.
Hence, any scientific fact, however factually it is known to us, when brought into practice, is bound to succumb to the emotional needs of the humans those are bringing it into practice.
That’s why the theory and practice always differ howsoever honest its implementers are.
That’s why even Eīshān Param Brahm Paramātmā has instructed us not to confine ourselves to the principles only i.e. Ved, but to the very Mission of Life/Existence ‘Kr’ñvanto Vishvamāryam’ Dharm Santānam, Dharm Sansthāpan, as well; to bring the principles into practice and study Divý Itihās, the Divine History for it:
- Dhiyo yo nah prachodayāt
- Yāthātathyatah
This fact, once realized in its full form, can immensely help us to re-study about marriage institution once opposed by the Communist thinkers so insistently, so persistently.
The Communist thinkers of those days found marriage institution an immensely avoidable obstacle in their pathway to Communism.
They thought marriage institutions give birth to Private Property.
The Communist thinkers were right.
But they were not right in thinking that the family was the only institution that caused the accumulation of Private Property.
Moreover, owing to immense drastic failure of communist economic, social and political system around the entire globe, we have to think more gravely now do we really need to oppose private property anymore.
Aren’t the financial scams, not done by the advocates of Private Property, more serious, more dangerous and more destructive to the humanity and Democracy than the Private Property itself is?
We should never forget that the destruction of Private Property absolutely, leads to destroy the family itself.
Frederick Engels has already written in the subject as much as we don’t need any analysis more to understand the subject comprehensively.
We need Private Property to protect and safeguard a family.
We have no other option to it.
Consequently, why not support Welfare Capitalism and State Capitalism instead of opposing Private Property?
We have experienced bitterly that our industries can’t survive in so-called Communism.
Moreover, we have experienced bitterly too that Communism has led to a totalitarianism called Stalinism now.
We need industries to go ahead.
In fact, we need industries to march ahead.
The Welfare Capitalism and State Capitalism are more suitable for it then the so-called Communism or the ‘Socialism’ prone to nonstop Scams.
Shouldn’t we think over it more gravely now?
Today, we can easily observe around us that even the singles have Private Property.
Moreover, to be more exactly honest and sincere, the entire history of humankind has proven now that the singles crave for Private Property even more than the married persons do.
Why is it so?
Because the married persons have their family to take care of them in their old age, while the singles don’t.
They have only their money to take care of them in their old age.
It is the reason why the singles are found more corrupt than the married persons in accumulating Private Property and wealth.
That’s why Hinduism does not support single life, except only when a single can’t afford even a single wife.
It specifically orders:
‘S’ nah pitév sūnavé’gné sūpāyano bhav,
Sachasvā nah svastayé.’
‘He, be unto us, as a father to son, Agni, easy to access.
Be together optimum, properly, for our welfare.’
— Ved: R’gved: 1| 1| 9
‘Ihaiv stam mā vi yaushŧam vishvamāyurvyashnutam,
Krīdantau putrairnaptr’bhirmodmānau své gr’hé.’
‘Abide ye both only here. Don’t be separated. Enjoy whole life sporting with sons grandsons, rejoicing in own home.’
— Ved: R’gved: 10| 85| 42
‘Ihaiv stam mā vi yaushŧam vishvamāyurvyashnutam,
Krīdantau putrairnaptr’bhirmodmānau svastakau.’
‘Abide ye both only here. Don’t be separated. Enjoy whole life sporting with sons grandsons4, rejoicing in the lovely home.’
— Ved: Atharv Ved: 14|1|22
The Communist thinkers never thought, neither they could, in those days of too limited resources to research anything that, marriage institution was not the only vice in their pathway to Communism.
In fact, the singles are more severe problems in their way.
The Communist thinkers wildly opposed marriage institution and family.
In fact they are still opposing it blindly, not even realizing the fact that the entire history of humankind has already proven them wrong now.
The Communism as a movement has lost its original momentum now.
It is not because it’s nonsense, as it’s claimed by its blind communal opponents.
The Communism as a movement is not nonsense.
It is necessary for the uplifting of the downtroddens.
Even Hinduism has the same goal as The Communism as a movement has.
The point where Hinduism differs with the Communism as a movement is not its goal, its means of implementation instead.
So, the Communism as a movement doesn’t need to oppose either marriage institution or family ever to achieve its mission.
Hinduism, Islam, Judaism, Christianity, in fact no religion, basically, is in opposition to the Communism as a movement, at all.
The Communism as a movement believed that the mission could be achieved through the dictatorship of the laborers.
The subsequent history of humankind has now expressly proven that such a belief of the then Communists was wrong.
Why?
Because, as already said, the Communism was then only a theory.
It was never practiced by its propellers.
Every theory when it is brought into practice, always refines itself.
No theorist can ever anticipate, absolutely and flawlessly, what lies in its pathway in future.
After all, every theorist, whatsoever theory he/she propels, is a human being, and bound to remain a human being.
A human being is not an omniscient, neither he/she ever can be.
So, howsoever the theory he/she proposes is flawless when propelled, it’s bound to prove in future that it wasn’t so.
The laborers never knew how the enterprises are built up and run.
If they had known how to build up enterprises and how to run them, they would have already done it without any help of the Communist thinkers.
Why have they waited for the moment the Communist thinkers declare them the dictators of a country?
To build up any enterprise first of all an enterpriser has to dream of it to the extent that it becomes an obsession to him/her.
Until and unless it isn’t an obsession to him even an enterpriser can’t build up any enterprise let alone any laborer or a group of laborers.
An enterpriser builds up his/her enterprise first in his/her own mind with its each and every minutest details.
He is so obsessed with these minutest details that, he sees it in his mind.
This imaginary vision in his/her mind always exists in his/her mind while he/she attempts to bring it into fact.
Until and unless this obsession does not become his/her madness, he/she can’t bring into existence.
It’s also a labor, the original Communist thinkers never realized.
That’s why when they took hold of the excellently running enterprises and put them under the dictatorship of the laborers, even the excellently running enterprises failed to continue.
The dictators lacked this vision, this obsession, and this madness.
It was the oxygen an enterpriser supplies to the enterprises.
Unfortunately only he/she can do it, none else.
The Communist thinkers never realized it.
The Communist thinkers made the laborers dictators on the shrewd persons who knew very well how to win the obstacles in their pathways.
They bribed the laborers in administration heavily.
The laborers in administration had never seen money.
They surrendered to the bribery of shrewdest businesspersons.
The movement started suffering heavily.
And ultimately it flopped.
It had to.
The laborers in administration were most of the persons who were everlosers.*
Watch your present day politicians.
Who are they?
Isn’t it a fact that most of them are the persons who are highly Uneducated/Under educated?
Isn’t it a fact that so many of them are criminal/criminal minded?
Why is it so?
Because most of the laborers in administration were dictators, but the persons they dictated were shrewder and more efficient.
The businesspersons became kingmakers instead of kings.
Apparently the businesspersons were not administrators, the chosen representatives of the people were.
But the businesspersons were kingmakers and shrewder.
The dictatorship of the Uneducated/Under educated ones, on shrewder persons, made itself ineffective.
Administration requires prudence.
The laborers in administration hadn’t developed it.
The system, consequently, failed.
It had to.*
Ved: 4 Atharv Ved: Kānd 14| Vivāh Kānd: Sookt 1| Mantr 3
——————————————————————————
More Commentary on Ved from DSM Satyarthi:
1. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 1| Mantr 1
2. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 1| Mantr 2
3. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 1| Mantr 3
4. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 5| Mantr 3
5. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 7| Mantr 5
6. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 7| Mantr 8
4. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 1
5. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 2
6. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 3
7. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 4
8. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 5
9. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 6
10. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 7
11. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 8
12.R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 19| Mantr 9
13. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 33| Mantr 1
14. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 33| Mantr 2
14. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 58| Mantr 6
15. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 164| Mantr 20
16. R’gved: Mandal 1| Sookt 164| Mantr 46
17. R’gved: Mandal 2| Sookt 1| Mantr 1
18 R’gved: Mandal 3| Sookt 1| Mantr 1
19. R’gved: Mandal 3| Sookt 6| Mantr 2
20. R’gved: Mandal 4| Sookt 1| Mantr 1
21. R’gved: Mandal 4| Sookt 26| Mantr 2
22. R’gved: Mandal 5| Sookt 1| Mantr 1
23. R’gved: Mandal 6| Sookt 1| Mantr 1
24. R’gved: Mandal 7| Sookt 1| Mantr 1
25. R’gved: Mandal 8| Sookt 1| Mantr 1
26. R’gved: Mandal 9| Sookt 1| Mantr 1
27. R’gved: Mandal 9| Sookt 63| Mantr 4-5
28. R’gved: Mandal 10| Sookt 1| Mantr 1
29. R’gved: Mandal 10| Sookt 85| Mantr 42
30. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 1| Mantr 1
31. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 1| Mantr 2
32. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 1| Mantr 3
33. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 1| Mantr 4
34. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 11| Mantr 1
35. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 13| Mantr 4
36. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 23| Mantr 3
37. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 31| Mantr 18
38. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 40| Mantr2
39. Yajurved: Adhyaay’ 40| Mantr8
40. Saamved: Mantr 1
41. Sāmved: Mantr 115
42. Sāmved: Mantr 641: Mahānāmnyārchik| 1
43. Sāmved: Mantr 650: Mahānāmnyārchik| 10
44. Sāmved: Mantr 651: Uttarārchik
45. Atharv Ved: Kaand 1| Sookt 1| Mantr 1
46. Atharv Ved: Kānd 3| Sookt 30| Mantr 3
47. Atharv Ved: Kānd 3| Sookt 30| Mantr 4
48. Atharv Ved: Kānd 3| Sookt 30| Mantr 6
49. Atharv Ved: Kānd 4| Sookt 4| Mantr 6
50. Atharv Ved: Kānd 4| Sookt 4| Mantr 7
51. Atharv Ved: Kānd 4| Sookt 4| Mantr 8
52. Atharv Ved: Kaand 4| Sookt 13| Mantr 1
53. Atharv Ved: Kaand 8| Sookt 1| Mantr 6
54. Atharv Ved: Kaand 8| Sookt 4| Mantr 22
55. Atharv Ved: Kaand 14| Sookt 1| Mantr 1
56. Atharv Ved: Kaand 14| Sookt 1| Mantr 2
57. Atharv Ved: Kaand 14| Sookt 1| Mantr 3
58. Atharv Ved: Kaand 14| Sookt 1| Mantr 4
59. Atharv Ved: Kaand 14| Sookt 1| Mantr 22
60.Atharv Ved: Kaand 14| Sookt 2| Mantr 25
Hinduism according to Ved: DSM Satyarthi 